A NUT FOR THE DOCTORS.

[Illustration: 168]

Would you ask, Who is the greatest tyrant of modern days? Mr. O'Connell

will tell you--Nicholas, or Es-partero. An Irish Whig member will

reply, Dan himself. An _attaché_ at an embassy would say, Lord

Palmerston,--“'Tis Cupid ever makes us slaves!” A French _deputé_ of the

Thiers party will swear it is Louis Philippe. Count D'Orsay will say,

his tailor. But I will tell you it is none of these: the most pitiless

autocrat of the nineteenth century is--the President of the College of

Physicians.

Of all the unlimited powers possessed by irresponsible man, I know of

nothing at all equal to his, who, _mero motu_, of his own free will and

caprice, can at any moment call a meeting of the dread body at

whose head he stands, assemble the highest dignitaries of the

land--archbishops and bishops, chancellors, chief barons, and chief

remembrancers--to listen to the minute anatomy of a periwinkle's

mustachios, or some singular provision in the physiology of a crab's

breeches-pocket: all of whom, _luto non obstante_, must leave their

peaceful homes and warm hearths to “assist” at a meeting in which, nine

cases out of ten, they take as much interest as a Laplander does in the

health of the Grand Lama, or Mehemet Ali in the proceedings of Father

Mathew.

By nine o'clock the curtain rises, displaying a goodly mob of medical

celebrities: the old ones characterised by the astute look and searching

glance, long and shrewd practice in the world's little failings ever

confers; the young ones, anxious, wide awake, and fidgetty, not

quite satisfied with what services they may be called on to render in

candle-snuffing and crucible work; while between both is your transition

M. D.--your medical tadpole, with some practice and more pretension,

his game being to separate from the great unfeed, and rub his shoulders

among the “dons” of the art, from whose rich board certain crumbs are

ever falling, in the shape of country jaunts, small operations, and

smaller consultings. Through these promiscuously walk the “_gros

bonnets_” of the church and the bar, with now and then--if the scene be

Ireland--a humane Viceroy, and a sleepy commander of the forces. Round

the room are glass cases filled with what at first blush you might

be tempted to believe were the _ci-devant_ professors of the college,

embalmed, or in spirits; but on nearer inspection you detect to be

a legion of apes, monkeys, and ourangoutangs, standing or sitting in

grotesque attitudes. Among them, pleasingly diversified, you discover

murderers' heads, parricides' busts in plaster, bicephalous babies, and

shapeless monsters with two rows of teeth. Here you are regaled with

refreshments “with what appetite you may,” and chat away the time, until

the tinkle of a small bell announces the approach of the lecture.

For the most part, this is a good, drowsy, sleep-disposing affair of an

hour long, written to show, that from some peculiarity lately discovered

in the cerebral vessels, man's natural attitude was to stand on his

head; or that, from chemical analysis just invented, it was clear, if we

live to the age of four hundred years and upwards, part of our duodenum

will be coated with a delicate aponeurosis of sheet iron.

Now, with propositions of this kind I never find fault. I am satisfied

to play my part as a biped in this breathing world, and to go out of it

too, without any rivalry with Methuselah. But I'll tell you with what

I am by no means satisfied,--nor shall I ever feel satisfied--nor do I

entertain any sentiment within a thousand miles of gratitude to the man

who tells me, that food--beef and mutton, veal, lamb, &c.--are nothing

but gas and glue. The wretch who found out the animiculas in clean

water was bad enough. There are simple-minded people who actually take

this as a beverage: what must be their feelings now, if they reflect

on the myriads of small things like lobsters, with claws and tails,

all fighting and swallowing each other, that are disporting in their

stomachs? But only think of him who converts your cutlet into charcoal,

and your steak into starch! It may stick to your ribs after that, to

be sure; but will it not stick harder to your conscience? With what

pleasure do you help yourself to your haunch, when the conviction is

staring you in the face, that what seems venison is but adipose matter

and azote? That you are only making a great Nassau balloon of yourself

when you are dreaming of hard condition, and preparing yourself for the

fossil state when blowing the froth off your porter.

Of latter years the great object of science would appear to be an

earnest desire to disenchant us from all the agreeable and pleasant

dreams we have formed of life, and to make man insignificant without

making him humble. Thus, one class of philosophers labour hard to prove

that manhood is but monkeyhood--that a slight adaptation of the tail

to the customs of civilized life has enabled us to be seated; while the

invention of looking-glasses, bear's grease, cold cream, and macassar,

have cultivated our looks into the present fashion.

Another, having felt over our skulls, gravely asserts, “There is a _vis

à tergo_ of wickedness implanted in us, that must find vent in murder

and bloodshed.” While the magnetic folk would make us believe that we

are merely a kind of ambulating electric-machine, to be charged at

will by the first M. Lafontaine we meet with, and mayhap explode from

over-pressure.

While such liberties are taken with us without, the case is worse

within. Our circulation is a hydraulic problem; our stomach is a mill--a

brewing vat--a tanner's yard--a crucible, or a retort. You yourself, in

all the resplendent glory of your braided frock, and your decoration

of the Guelph, are nothing but an aggregate of mechanical and chemical

inventions, as often going wrong as right; and your wife, in the pride

of her Parisian bonnet, and robe _à la Victorine_, is only gelatine and

adipose substance, phosphate of lime, and a little arsenic.

Now, let me ask, what remains to us of life, if we are to be robbed of

every fascination and charm of existence in this fashion? And again--has

medical science so exhausted all the details of practical benefit to

mankind, that it is justified in these far-west explorations into the

realms of soaring fancy, or the gloomy depths of chemical analysis?

Hydrophobia, consumption, and tetanus are not so curable that we can

afford to waste our sympathies on chimpanzees: nor is this world so

pleasant that we must deny ourselves the advantage of all its illusions,

and throw away the garment in which Nature has clothed her nakedness.

No, no. There was sound philosophy in Peter, in the “Tale of a Tub,” who

assured his guests that whatever their frail senses might think to the

contrary, the hard crusts were excellent and tender mutton; but I see

neither rhyme nor reason in convincing us, that amid all the triumphs of

turtle and white bait, Ardennes ham and _pâté de Strasbourg_, our food

is merely coke and glue, roach, lime, starch, and magnesia.

Nuts and Nutcrackers(#35500) · 第 34 / 57 题