CHAPTER II

MEETING ORGANIZATION: ITS CONNECTION WITH EDUCATION

[Sidenote: An organization developed]

The organization of meetings in the Society of Friends was based almost

entirely on the recommendation of its founder, and still obtains

without many variations from the type which was thus early begun. The

organization thus planned was not developed completely at one time, but

depended rather on the growth of the society in this or that section of

the country. Meetings, as at first established, were not so specialized

in their functions as they came to be later; there were those for worship

and sufferings, the latter becoming in due time a specialized part of the

yearly meeting, and for taking action in regard to poor members. The time

was further occupied in disciplining those members who were not faithful

to the doctrines of the church.

[Sidenote: The place of organization in the establishment of schools]

It is of particular importance for us to understand the ordinary

arrangement of the meetings and their relation to each other, since

it was by virtue of this organization of the church that its schools

were set up. Perhaps no other factor played so important a part in the

success which was met with in setting up schools, as that through the

organization of the meetings all localities were kept in closer touch

with each other than would otherwise have been possible at that time.

As it was, the local meetings were literally forced to listen to the

school-proposition, even though they were in the backwoods of America,

or inhabited the Barbados. The chief means of communication established

were church letters, travelling ministers, representatives from the

constituent meetings, and reports of general meetings which were

distributed to all those belonging thereunto.[38]

[Sidenote: Purposes of the organization]

Originally the purpose of the church organization seems to have been

twofold. It was realized that among those who became members some

would be less constant in their behavior than others; hence some sort

of oversight was necessary to keep each and every one in line. In the

second place, there were many adherents in limited circumstances and the

Quakers’ belief made it imperative that these people be taken care of in

the best manner possible.[39] Realizing the existence of these conditions

among members, it was clear to Fox that a definitely organized meeting

was necessary whereby (1) the necessary assistance could be extended to

those in need, (2) discipline could be enforced for the maintenance of

the religious life of the organization, and (3) new meetings could be

officially established when and where they became necessary.

[Sidenote: Early meetings established]

The earliest mention that is made of a meeting established for these

purposes is in the case of Balby, in Yorkshire, in 1658.[40] This

statement is not exactly accurate, it seems, for we have also mention

made of a general meeting, or what came to be known as a yearly meeting,

as early as 1654 when one was held at Swannington in Leicestershire.[41]

The meeting at Balby seems to have been of considerable importance and

is frequently mentioned as one of the stopping places of George Fox. He

recounts a meeting held at that place in 1660 “in a great orchard of

John Killam’s where it was supposed some thousands of people and Friends

were gathered together.”[42] The business of the yearly meeting seems to

have been to devote some time to the affairs of the church; at any rate,

this idea is expressed by Fox in writing of a similar meeting held at

Skipton in 1660.[43] The characteristic of these meetings, that is always

mentioned, is that they were attended by representatives from various

towns and counties. The yearly meeting is still a representative body.

[Sidenote: Meetings develop from larger to the smaller]

The smaller meetings for worship were, of course, the first established.

Aside from the question of worship, however, the development of the

organization was from the larger unit to the smaller. We have noted

above the beginning of the general or yearly meeting. As the sect grew

in numbers, and the labor of caring for these, sometimes in a physical

sense and again in the religious, increased, it became necessary to have

a finer organization, the smaller units of which would reach the smallest

communities. By 1665 there were established (1) the _yearly_ and (2) the

_quarterly_ meetings, and in 1666 Fox recommended the establishment of a

smaller unit, the _monthly_ meeting, saying:

Then I was moved of the Lord to recommend the setting up of

five monthly meetings of men and women in the City of London

(besides the women’s meetings and the quarterly meetings) to

take care of God’s glory, and to admonish and exhort such as

walked disorderly or carelessly, and not according to the

truth. For whereas Friends had had only quarterly meetings,

now truth was spread, and Friends were grown more numerous,

I was moved to recommend the setting up of monthly meetings

throughout the nation. And the Lord opened to me what I must

do, and how the men’s and the women’s monthly and quarterly

meetings should be ordered and established in this and other

nations; and that I should write to those where I did not come,

to do the same.[44]

[Sidenote: Number of monthly meetings set up]

Immediately after this, there is mentioned the establishment of monthly

meetings in Essex, Suffolk and Norfolk, Huntingdonshire, Nottinghamshire,

Leicestershire and Warwickshire and many others.[45] Three years later

(1669) he reports fourteen monthly meetings in the county of York.[46]

The rapid increase in the number of meetings and the extent of territory

covered by them is a fair indication of the phenomenal growth of the

society.

Following his resolve and subsequent exertions toward setting up of

monthly meetings, during which he made very extensive campaigns, there

came the great step which was taken to organize all under the general

leadership of a yearly meeting, that of London. This was accomplished

in 1672.[47] This general meeting of ministers drew up a resolution or

minute to this effect:

[Sidenote: London Yearly Meeting established]

It is concluded agreed and assented to by Friends present

that for the better ordering, managing and regulating of the

public affairs of Friends relating to the Truth and the service

thereof, there be a general meeting of Friends held at London

once a year, in the week called Whitsun-week, to consist of six

Friends for the City of London, three for the city of Bristol,

two for the city of Colchester and one or two from each of the

counties of England and Wales respectively.[48]

The meeting convened in the year following, in accordance with the

above resolution. Many of the duties performed by the General Meeting

of Ministers were transferred to the representatives of the various

meetings. The ministers, though in fact subject to the approval or

disapproval of monthly meetings, did not relinquish their oversight of

each other.

[Sidenote: The preparative meeting the smallest unit]

The smallest unit in the organization was the _particular_ or

_preparative_ meeting. This meeting is not mentioned in all localities,

though it is clear from Fox’s statements that he recognized this as a

part of the organization, for in a letter of 1669 he writes concerning

the representatives of the quarterly meetings that,

none that are raw or weak and are not able to give a testimony

of the affairs of the church and Truth, may go on behalf of

the particular meetings to the quarterly meetings, but may be

nursed up in your monthly meetings.[49]

[Sidenote: Details of organization worked out by Fox]

This statement is given here merely for the purpose of pointing out how

completely the ideas of Fox were embodied in even the smallest unit of

church organization. There is adequate proof of their existence in all

sections occupied by the Quakers in Pennsylvania, and of their great

importance in carrying out the details both of relief work for the poor,

and in the establishment of schools.[50]

There have been noted different phases of the development of the meeting

organization. When finally it was complete in all its parts, there

existed a hierarchy of meetings, the lower and smaller units of which

were subject to and under the direction of the higher. This resultant

organization may be made somewhat clearer by means of a diagrammatical

representation.

[Illustration]

[Sidenote: Functions of yearly meeting]

The above diagram represents the relation of the various kinds of

meetings in the organization of the Society of Friends. The yearly

meeting (Fig. 1, Y) is the general head of the entire organization. Its

functions are of a general directive nature and its influence of very

wide extent. For example, it will be shown a little later that the Yearly

Meeting of London issued, very early, certain communications concerning

education which were sent to each meeting belonging to the London Yearly

Meeting. In the same manner it exercised its influence along other lines

than education. There is no special virtue in the number of meetings

represented above; for example, the three Q’s do not mean that each

and every yearly meeting had three quarterly meetings under its care.

The number is not specified. In the case of the Philadelphia Yearly

Meeting there are at present nine quarterly meetings and two half-yearly

meetings.[51] The same variation is also true in the number of monthly

meetings in a quarter, Caln Quarterly having only one monthly meeting,

while Western Quarterly has six.[52] The same is true as to the number of

preparative meetings.

[Sidenote: Functions of the quarterly meeting]

The quarterly meeting is representative of the monthly meetings which

comprise it. Its functions are chiefly directive and advisory, though

it may often occur that a bad case of discipline may be turned over to

it by the monthly meeting. In the case of school regulations, its chief

concern was to pass on the recommendations of the yearly meeting to the

monthly meetings and to repeat them frequently, that the lower meetings

might be stirred up to action.[53] It was also through the quarterly

meetings that the reports on the conditions of schools in the monthly

meetings were collected and sent to the yearly meeting. It was also quite

customary for the monthly units to pass any of their decisions on a

matter up to the quarterly unit for its formal approval or disapproval.

Especially is this marked in educational affairs, and particularly in the

Philadelphia Quarter.[54] This is most marked in the earliest years after

establishment, and is due, no doubt, to a lack at that time of a very

close differentiation in the functions of the meetings.

[Sidenote: Monthly meeting the business unit]

The monthly meetings are primarily the business units of the

organization. Before them come all cases of care for the poor,

apprenticing of children, enforcement of discipline, establishment of

schools, requests for permission to marry, to remove to a new location

and still many others. They may settle some of these finally, or they may

act in connection with their superior meeting as mentioned above.

[Sidenote: Function of the preparative meeting]

The preparative meeting is the smallest organization unit and has its

finger on the pulse of the local community at all times.[55] Officially

it acts as the agent of the monthly meeting in carrying out the details

of any piece of work that must be done, and which the monthly meeting

is willing to delegate thus far.[56] Thus in the case of Horsham, for

instance, the business of the schools in the scope of the preparative

meeting is turned over to it and their organization and maintenance

are under the care of its school committee.[57] The preparative meeting

is at all times cognizant of breaches of discipline among its members

and responsible to report such to the monthly meeting for settlement.

One might go to great length to enumerate and explain all the detailed

duties of each of these branches of the organization, but it is believed

sufficient has been said of them, to make their action in educational

matters intelligible.

We have noted, somewhat briefly to be sure, the organization and

interrelation of the meetings in the Society of Friends. It is now

necessary to point out what connection existed between this organization

and the program put forward for the establishment of schools. This

will be done by the presentation of certain extracts from meeting

records which seem in all cases to have been responsible for kindling

an interest in education in near and distant meetings, and keeping that

interest alive by virtue of many advices until some material results were

forthcoming. The selections presented are not continuous; they are chosen

because they are representative and illustrative of the point in question.

[Sidenote: Attention of yearly meeting to education in 1690]

The Yearly Meeting of London was established (see page 17) in 1672.

Consistent with the purpose of its establishment, as then stated, it

began at once to busy itself with certain important problems of the

church. Among the first that received a considerable amount of attention

was the education of the youths of members in the society, which was, of

course, soon extended to include others. For instance, in 1690, there is

given out this educational advice.

And, dear Friends, it is our Christian and earnest advice and

counsel to all Friends concerned (so far as they are able or

may be capable) to provide schoolmasters and mistresses who

are faithful Friends, to teach and instruct their children,

and not to send them to such schools where they are taught the

corrupt ways, manners and fashions of the world and of the

Heathen in their authors and manners of the heathenish gods and

goddesses....[58]

And again in the year following we find the following advice:

[Sidenote: 1691]

We are glad to hear that care is taken in some places,

according to former advices, for the providing of schoolmasters

and mistresses who are faithful Friends to instruct Friends’

children in such method as Truth allows. And we desire that

Friends may go on in the care to provide such education and

schools, for the advantage of their children and posterity.[59]

More specific instructions follow in 1695.

[Sidenote: 1695]

And it is desired ... to take special care for the good

education and order of Friends’ children in God’s holy fear,

... and also to see that schools and schoolmasters who are

faithful Friends, and well qualified, be placed and encouraged

in all counties, cities and great towns, or places where they

may be needed; and that such schoolmasters, as much as may

be, sometimes correspond with one another for their help and

improvement in such good and easy methods as are agreeable to

the Truth and the children’s advantage and benefit; and that

care be taken that poor Friends’ children may freely partake of

such education, in order to apprenticeship.[60]

At a much later date, 1745, very similar instructions are found among

those issued.

[Sidenote: and 1745]

And, dear Friends, though frequently and repeated advices have

been given from this meeting, respective of the education of

our youth in sobriety, godliness and Christian virtues; yet,

this being a matter of very great moment for the welfare of

the present and future generations, we think it our incumbent

duty again to recommend an especial care therein.... We also

recommend to schoolmasters and mistresses, to educate the

children committed to their charge, in the frequent reading

of those sacred writings and such other good books as tend to

their instruction in true Christianity; whereby their minds

are in danger of being corrupted and led aside from the way of

truth and holiness.[61]

A casual reading of the above statements, or any of numerous others like

them, will suffice to point out to what great extent they are similar

to the statements of Fox and other Quakers who were interested in

education.[62] For convenience, the content of these extracts from the

yearly meeting minutes may be summarized in something like the following:

1. To educate morally, according to Friends’ standards.

2. To train the individual in some practical employment.

[Sidenote: A summary of important points in the extracts]

They are accompanied by:

1. Select schools.

2. Teachers of approved morality.

3. Selected subject matter.

4. Apprenticeship training.

5. Schools to be in all communities, the stronger assisting the

weaker.[63]

[Sidenote: Exemplified in schools set up]

The influence of these fundamental ideas about education is clearly

reflected in the type of schools that were first set up in England.

Those recommended by Fox at Waltham and Shacklewell in 1667, for both

boys and girls, represent the first attempt.[64] At a later date, 1702,

Clerkenwell was established under the oversight of London and Middlesex

Quarterly Meetings, and in the latter part of the century the Ackworth

School, founded by John Fothergill in 1779.[65] In all the schools

established, of which those mentioned are representative, there is always

found this primary emphasis on _moral_ and _useful_ training.[66]

[Sidenote: Influence exerted by means of ministers, epistles and tracts]

The great influence of English Quaker education on that in America was

made secure by virtue of the very intimate relation between the meetings

in both countries; this relation being constantly maintained through

the traveling ministers, and tracts and epistles sent out by the yearly

meetings. The same alertness, characteristic of London Yearly Meeting in

these affairs, was likewise assumed by the Burlington and Philadelphia

Meetings, from whence came numerous advices. As concrete evidence of

this close relation existing, and the consequent communications, a few

extracts thereof are inserted.

There was brought to this meeting (Middletown Monthly) the

last London printed epistle, which was read, containing sundry

weighty advices and exhortations with some comfortable account

of the prosperity of the Truth in divers places, as also the

extracts of our last yearly meeting (Philadelphia) wherein

is recommended amongst other things, a half collection for

the next year, and some proposals concerning the settling of

schools in the country....[67]

That these letters of advice were not mere formalities but were really

seriously considered and acted upon favorably or unfavorably, as in the

first case below, is shown adequately in the following:

This meeting taking into consideration the proposals of last

yearly meeting concerning the settling of schools in the

country, are of the opinion that the method proposed will not

answer for the Friends who live remote from each other in the

country....[68]

[Sidenote: Had definite results]

In the case of Darby Monthly Meeting, later in the century, there is an

instance in which the recommendations of the yearly meeting (1778) are

followed most minutely in the reorganization.

In consideration of improving our school, agreeable to the

recommendations of the last Yearly Meeting in 1778, and

subsequent advices down to this time having been spread in

this meeting and so and several remarks made thereon, pointing

out the advantages which may arise therefrom to the present

rising and succeeding ages, and the loss sustained for the want

thereof, tending to animate a desire to pursue the interesting

prospect. It is therefore now agreed that in future five

Friends be appointed and called the overseers of the Darby

School, three of whom shall be deemed a sufficient number to

transact any business within their appointment, viz.: to have

the oversight of and visit the school, examine the progress the

scholars make in their learning, remark thereon as appears to

them necessary; inspect the teachers’ conduct, and from time to

time as occasion may be, with the approbation of the meeting,

agree with and employ a teacher or teachers, and on sufficient

cause appearing, discharge any such teacher or teachers, as

also any unruly scholars who cannot be brought to submission

to the rules and orders of the school; hear and determine upon

all differences relative to the school which may arise between

any teacher and employer, take into consideration and endeavor

out after some eligible plan for raising a fund for the benefit

of the school and as way shall open for it, pursue the same

accordingly, and every matter and thing tending to promote a

settlement for a school agreeable to the recommendations before

cited; and as some of our deceased brothers have made donations

to this meeting for the benevolent purpose of schooling

children of the poor, therefore, the aforesaid overseers are

hereby empowered and directed to receive and collect from the

trustees thereof for the time being, the interest arising from

the said donations, dispose thereof agreeable to the intentions

of the Donors, and when necessary, advise and assist the

trustees in taking better securities for the principal, and as

future donations may be made for the benefit of the school, the

overseers are directed to extend care therein, as the same

shall become necessary, and keep fair minutes of all moneys

received and expended and other matters of importance which

come before them, to be produced in this meeting when called

for, and preceding the quarterly meeting in the 8th month

annually make to this meeting a clear statement of the amount

received, expended and remaining in hand and outstanding and

of the capital under their care; what donations made within

the year past and for what purposes; and of such other matters

as they may judge needful to enable this meeting to transmit

the true estate of the school to the Quarterly Meeting, and

as a fundamental of their proceedings they transcribe a copy

of their minutes, together with such other writings as are

necessary for their government in what is now constituted their

cares.[69]

A committee was accordingly appointed and directed to choose their

officers, that their business might be begun at once and properly

performed.

[Sidenote: Works of Penn, Barclay, Sewell, Turford, and others

distributed]

In addition to the advices sent out in the form of letters from the

yearly sessions, the meeting also furthered regularly the distribution

of books, tracts and pamphlets, usually the expression of prominent

Friends, such as, for example, Penn’s _Advice to His Children_, Barclay’s

_Apology_, Sewell’s _History of Quakers_, Barclay’s _Catechism_,

Turford’s _Grounds of a Holy Life_, and many others of similar nature.

Works of this kind were frequently sent over in lots, sometimes for free

distribution, or to be sold to members; as witness the following:

Joseph Kirkbride and Walter Faucit, having been lately in

London upon the service of Truth, did subscribe for 100 of

Barclay’s Apologies on behalf of this yearly meeting, which the

said meeting approves of; and agreed that Samuel Carpenter pay

for them out of the yearly meeting stock and distribute them to

each meeting according to their proportion of books that they

usually receive, that so they may be given away by the several

meetings for the service of truth.[70]

Sam Nixon informs the meeting that he brought from last

quarterly meeting ten small books, entitled _Reflections and

Maxims_, wrote by William Penn and printed for the use of

schools, which he desired us to take the care of and to apply

to the use intended as occasion may require.[71]

Produced at this meeting, 6 Barclay’s _Apologies_, 12 Richard

Davis’ _Journals_, 7 Daniel Stanton’s _Journals_, 4 Hugh

Turford’s _Grounds of a Holy Life_, 8 Barclay’s _Catechisms_;

37 books under care of Thos. Pickering, Thos. Watson, and

Robert Kirkbride—to lend to the poor or others, as they think

useful.[72]

The foregoing presentation of conditions within the church organization,

their method of interaction, has been made so that the reader may

understand that whatever activities may be later noted among the Quakers

in Pennsylvania in connection with the establishment of schools, were

intimately connected with and were in fact the result of the English

influence.

SUMMARY

The form of organization of the meeting in the Society of Friends

was due to the needs then existing, and was planned, even to the

smallest unit, by the founder of the society. The chief purposes of the

organization, when first begun, were (1) moral and religious discipline

of members, (2) assistance to the poor among their number, and (3) to

protect themselves against the oppression of outsiders (function of the

meeting on sufferings). The functions of the higher meeting (yearly)

were chiefly advisory in character, while those of the lower meetings

(preparative) were to work out the details. Educationally, the yearly

meeting exercised an influence very early by its frequent recommendations

and the literature sent to the smaller individual meetings. This rôle was

likewise assumed by the Burlington and Philadelphia Yearly Meeting.[73]

This close relationship between the meetings of different order and the

educational influence is in part shown by extracts taken from the meeting

records.

Early Quaker education in Pennsylvania · 第 2 / 12 章