The Athenians took an oath, on a certain crisis in their affairs,

to esteem wheat, the vine and the olive the bounds of Attica. The

territory of scholars is yet larger. A stranger but yesterday to every

person present, I find myself already at home, for the society of

lettered men is a university which does not bound itself with the walls

of one cloister or college, but gathers in the distant and solitary

student into its strictest amity. Literary men gladly acknowledge these

ties which find for the homeless and the stranger a welcome where

least looked for. But in proportion as we are conversant with the

laws of life, we have seen the like. We are used to these surprises.

This is but one operation of a more general law. As in coming among

strange faces we find that the love of letters makes us friends, so in

strange thoughts, in the worldly habits which harden us, we find with

some surprise that learning and truth and beauty have not let us go;

that the spiritual nature is too strong for us; that those excellent

influences which men in all ages have called the _Muse_, or by

some kindred name, come in to keep us warm and true; that the face

of Nature remains irresistibly alluring. We have strayed from the

territorial monuments of Attica, but here still are wheat and olives

and the vine.

I do not now refer to that intellectual conscience which forms

itself in tender natures, and gives us many twinges for our sloth

and unfaithfulness:--the influence I speak of is of a higher strain.

Stung by this intellectual conscience, we go to measure our tasks

as scholars, and screw ourselves up to energy and fidelity, and our

sadness is suddenly overshone by a sympathy of blessing. Beauty, the

inspirer, the cheerful festal principle, the leader of gods and men,

which draws by being beautiful, and not by considerations of advantage,

comes in and puts a new face on the world. I think the peculiar

office of scholars in a careful and gloomy generation is to be (as

the poets were called in the Middle Ages) Professors of the Joyous

Science, detectors and delineators of occult symmetries and unpublished

beauties; heralds of civility, nobility, learning and wisdom; affirmers

of the one law, yet as those who should affirm it in music and dancing;

expressors themselves of that firm and cheerful temper, infinitely

removed from sadness, which reigns through the kingdoms of chemistry,

vegetation, and animal life. Every natural power exhilarates; a true

talent delights the possessor first. A celebrated musician was wont

to say, that men knew not how much more he delighted himself with

his playing than he did others; for if they knew, his hearers would

rather demand of him than give him a reward. The scholar is here to

fill others with love and courage by confirming their trust in the

love and wisdom which are at the heart of all things; to affirm noble

sentiments; to hear them wherever spoken, out of the deeps of ages, out

of the obscurities of barbarous life, and to republish them:--to untune

nobody, but to draw all men after the truth, and to keep men spiritual

and sweet.

Language can hardly exaggerate the beatitude of the intellect flowing

into the faculties. This is the power that makes the world incarnated

in man, and laying again the beams of heaven and earth, setting the

north and the south, and the stars in their places. Intellect is the

science of metes and bounds; yet it sees no bound to the eternal

proceeding of law forth into nature. All the sciences are only new

applications, each translatable into the other, of the one law which

his mind is.

This, gentlemen, is the topic on which I shall speak,--the natural

and permanent function of the Scholar, as he is no permissive or

accidental appearance, but an organic agent in nature. He is here to

be the beholder of the real; self-centred amidst the superficial; here

to revere the dominion of a serene necessity and be its pupil and

apprentice by tracing everything home to a cause; here to be sobered,

not by the cares of life, as men say, no, but by the depth of his

draughts of the cup of immortality.

One is tempted to affirm the office and attributes of the scholar

a little the more eagerly, because of a frequent perversity of the

class itself. Men are ashamed of their intellect. The men committed by

profession as well as by bias to study, the clergyman, the chemist, the

astronomer, the metaphysician, the poet, talk hard and worldly, and

share the infatuation of cities. The poet and the citizen perfectly

agree in conversation on the wise life. The poet counsels his own

son as if he were a merchant. The poet with poets betrays no amiable

weakness. They all chime in, and are as inexorable as bankers on the

subject of real life. They have no toleration for literature; art is

only a fine word for appearance in default of matter. And they sit

white over their stoves, and talk themselves hoarse over the mischief

of books and the effeminacy of book-makers. But at a single strain of

a bugle out of a grove, or at the dashing among the stones of a brook

from the hills; at the sound of some subtle word that falls from the

lips of an imaginative person, or even at the reading in solitude

of some moving image of a wise poet, this grave conclusion is blown

out of memory; the sun shines, and the worlds roll to music, and the

poet replaces all this cowardly Self-denial and God-denial of the

literary class with the conviction that to one poetic success the world

will surrender on its knees. Instantly he casts in his lot with the

pearl-diver and the diamond-merchant. Like them he will joyfully lose

days and months, and estates and credit, in the profound hope that one

restoring, all-rewarding, immense success will arrive at last, which

will give him at one bound a universal dominion. And rightly; for if

his wild prayers are granted, if he is to succeed, his achievement is

the piercing of the brass heavens of use and limitation, and letting

in a beam of the pure eternity which burns up this limbo of shadows

and chimeras in which we dwell. Yes, Nature is too strong for us; she

will not be denied; she has balsams for our hurts, and hellebores for

our insanities. She does not bandy words with us, but comes in with a

new ravishing experience and makes the old time ridiculous. Every poet

knows the unspeakable hope, and represents its audacity.

I am not disposed to magnify temporary differences, but for the

moment it appears as if in former times learning and intellectual

accomplishments had secured to the possessor greater rank and

authority. If this were only the reaction from excessive expectations

from literature, now disappointed, it were a just censure. It was

superstitious to exact too much from philosophers and the literary

class. The Sophists, the Alexandrian grammarians, the wits of Queen

Anne’s, the philosophers and diffusion-societies have not much helped

us. Granted, freely granted. Men run out of one superstition into an

opposite superstition, and practical people in America give themselves

wonderful airs. The cant of the time inquires superciliously after the

new ideas; it believes that ideas do not lead to the owning of stocks;

they are perplexing and effeminating.

Young men, I warn you against the clamors of these self-praising

frivolous activities,--against these busybodies; against irrational

labor; against chattering, meddlesome, rich and official people. If

their doing came to any good end! Action is legitimate and good;

forever be it honored! right, original, private, necessary action,

proceeding new from the heart of man, and going forth to beneficent and

as yet incalculable ends. Yes; but not a petty fingering and running, a

senseless repeating of yesterday’s fingering and running; an acceptance

of the method and frauds of other men; an overdoing and busy-ness

which pretends to the honors of action, but resembles the twitches

of St. Vitus. The action of these men I cannot respect, for they do

not respect it themselves. They were better and more respectable abed

and asleep. All the best of this class, all who have any insight or

generosity of spirit are frequently disgusted, and fain to put it

behind them.

Gentlemen, I do not wish to check your impulses to action: I would

not hinder you of one swing of your arm. I do not wish to see you

effeminate gownsmen, taking hold of the world with the tips of your

fingers, or that life should be to you as it is to many, optical, not

practical. Far otherwise: I rather wish you to experiment boldly and

give play to your energies, but not, if I could prevail with you,

in conventional ways. I should wish your energy to run in works and

emergencies growing out of your personal character. Nature will fast

enough instruct you in the occasion and the need, and will bring to

each of you the crowded hour, the great opportunity. Love, Rectitude,

everlasting Fame, will come to each of you in loneliest places with

their grand alternatives, and Honor watches to see whether you dare

seize the palms.

I have no quarrel with action, only I prefer no action to misaction,

and I reject the abusive application of the term _practical_ to

those lower activities. Let us hear no more of the practical men, or I

will tell you something of them,--this, namely, that the scholar finds

in them unlooked-for acceptance of his most paradoxical experience.

There is confession in their eyes, and if they parade their business

and public importance, it is by way of apology and palliation for not

being the students and obeyers of those diviner laws. Talk frankly with

them and you learn that you have little to tell them; that the Spirit

of the Age has been before you with influences impossible to parry

or resist. The dry-goods men, and the brokers, the lawyers and the

manufacturers are idealists, and only differ from the philosopher in

the intensity of the charge. We are all contemporaries and bones of one

body.

The shallow clamor against theoretic men comes from the weak. Able men

may sometimes affect a contempt for thought, which no able man ever

feels. For what alone in the history of this world interests all men in

proportion as they are men? What but truth, and perpetual advance in

knowledge of it, and brave obedience to it in right action? Every man

or woman who can voluntarily or involuntarily give them any insight or

suggestion on these secrets they will hearken after. The poet writes

his verse on a scrap of paper, and instantly the desire and love of all

mankind take charge of it, as if it were Holy Writ. What need has he

to cross the sill of his door? Why need he meddle with politics? His

idlest thought, his yesternight’s dream is told already in the Senate.

What the Genius whispered him at night he reported to the young men at

dawn. He rides in them, he traverses sea and land. The engineer in the

locomotive is waiting for him; the steamboat is hissing at the wharf,

and the wheels whirling to go. ’Tis wonderful, ’tis almost scandalous,

this extraordinary favoritism shown to poets. I do not mean to excuse

it. I admit the enormous partiality. It only shows that such is the

gulf between our perception and our painting, the eye is so wise, and

the hand so clumsy, that all the human race have agreed to value a man

according to his power of expression. For him arms, art, politics,

trade waited like menials, until the lord of the manor should arrive.

Even the demonstrations of nature for millenniums seem not to have

attained their end, until this interpreter arrives. “I,” said the

great-hearted Kepler, “may well wait a hundred years for a reader,

since God Almighty has waited six thousand years for an observer like

myself.”

Genius is a poor man and has no house, but see, this proud landlord who

has built the palace and furnished it so delicately, opens it to him

and beseeches him to make it honorable by entering there and eating

bread. Where is the palace in England whose tenants are not too happy

if it can make a home for Pope or Addison or Swift or Burke or Canning

or Tennyson? Or if wealth has humors and wishes to shake off the yoke

and assert itself,--oh, by all means let it try! Will it build its

fences very high, and make its Almacks too narrow for a wise man to

enter? Will it be independent? I incline to concede the isolation which

it asks, that it may learn that it is not independent but parasitical.

There could always be traced, in the most barbarous tribes, and also in

the most character-destroying civilization, some vestiges of a faith

in genius, as in the exemption of a priesthood or bards or artists

from taxes and tolls levied on other men; or in civic distinction; or

in enthusiastic homage; or in hospitalities; as if men would signify

their sense that genius and virtue should not pay money for house and

land and bread, because they have a royal right in these and in all

things,--a first mortgage that takes effect before the right of the

present proprietor. For they are the First Good, of which Plato affirms

that “all things are for its sake, and it is the cause of everything

beautiful.”

This reverence is the re-establishment of natural order; for as the

solidest rocks are made up of invisible gases, as the world is made

of thickened light and arrested electricity, so men know that ideas

are the parents of men and things; there was never anything that did

not proceed from a thought. The scholar has a deep ideal interest in

the moving show around him. He knew the motley system in its egg.

We have--have we not?--a real relation to markets and brokers and

currency and coin. “Gold and silver,” says one of the Platonists, “grow

in the earth from the celestial gods,--an effluxion from them.” The

unmentionable dollar itself has at last a high origin in moral and

metaphysical nature. Union Pacific stock is not quite private property,

but the quality and essence of the universe is in that also. Have we

less interest in ships or in shops, in manual work or in household

affairs; in any object of nature, or in any handiwork of man; in any

relation of life or custom of society? The scholar is to show, in each,

identity and connexion; he is to show its origin in the brain of man,

and its secret history and issues. He is the attorney of the world, and

can never be superfluous where so vast a variety of questions are ever

coming up to be solved, and for ages.

I proceed to say that the allusions just now made to the extent of

his duties, the manner in which every day’s events will find him in

work, may show that his place is no sinecure. The scholar, when he

comes, will be known by an energy that will animate all who see him.

The labor of ambition and avarice will appear fumbling beside his. In

the right hands, literature is not resorted to as a consolation, and

by the broken and decayed, but as a decalogue. In this country we are

fond of results and of short ways to them; and most in this department.

In our experiences, learning is not learned, nor is genius wise. The

name of the Scholar is taken in vain. We who should be the channel of

that unweariable Power which never sleeps, must give our diligence no

holidays. Other men are planting and building, baking and tanning,

running and sailing, heaving and carrying, each that he may peacefully

execute the fine function by which they all are helped. Shall he play,

whilst their eyes follow him from far with reverence, attributing

to him the delving in great fields of thought, and conversing with

supernatural allies? If he is not kindling his torch or collecting oil,

he will fear to go by a workshop; he will not dare to hear the music of

a saw or plane; the steam-engine will reprimand, the steam-pipe will

hiss at him; he cannot look a blacksmith in the eye; in the field he

will be shamed by mowers and reapers. The speculative man, the scholar,

is the right hero. He is brave, because he sees the omnipotence of that

which inspires him. Is there only one courage and one warfare? I cannot

manage sword and rifle; can I not therefore be brave? I thought there

were as many courages as men. Is an armed man the only hero? Is a man

only the breech of a gun or the haft of a bowie-knife? Men of thought

fail in fighting down malignity, because they wear other armor than

their own. Let them decline henceforward foreign methods and foreign

courages. Let them do that which they can do. Let them fight by their

strength, not by their weakness. It seems to me that the thoughtful man

needs no armor but this--concentration. One thing is for him settled,

that he is to come at his ends. He is not there to defend himself,

but to deliver his message; if his voice is clear, then clearly; if

husky, then huskily; if broken, he can at least scream; gag him, he can

still write it; bruise, mutilate him, cut off his hands and feet, he

can still crawl towards his object on his stumps. It is the corruption

of our generation that men value a long life, and do not esteem life

simply as a means of expressing a sentiment.

The great English patriot Algernon Sidney wrote to his father from his

prison a little before his execution: “I have ever had in my mind that

when God should cast me into such a condition as that I cannot save my

life but by doing an indecent thing he shows me the time has come when

I should resign it.” Beauty belongs to the sentiment, and is always

departing from those who depart out of that. The hero rises out of

all comparison with contemporaries and with ages of men, because he

disesteems old age, and lands, and money, and power, and will oppose

all mankind at the call of that private and perfect Right and Beauty in

which he lives.

Man is a torch borne in the wind. The ends I have hinted at made the

scholar or spiritual man indispensable to the Republic or Commonwealth

of Man. Nature could not leave herself without a seer and expounder.

But he could not see or teach without organs. The same necessity

then that would create him reappears in his splendid gifts. There is

no power in the mind but in turn becomes an instrument. The descent

of genius into talents is part of the natural order and history of

the world. The incarnation must be. We cannot eat the granite nor

drink hydrogen. They must be decompounded and recompounded into corn

and water before they can enter our flesh. There is a great deal of

spiritual energy in the universe, but it is not palpable to us until

we can make it up into man. There is plenty of air, but it is worth

nothing until by gathering it into sails we can get it into shape and

service to carry us and our cargo across the sea. Then it is paid

for by hundreds of thousands of our money. Plenty of water also, sea

full, sky full; who cares for it? But when we can get it where we want

it, and in measured portions, on a mill-wheel, or boat-paddle, we

will buy it with millions. There is plenty of wild azote and carbon

unappropriated, but it is nought till we have made it up into loaves

and soup. So we find it in higher relations. There is plenty of wild

wrath, but it steads not until we can get it racked off, shall I say?

and bottled into persons; a little pure, and not too much, to every

head. How many young geniuses we have known, and none but ourselves

will ever hear of them for want in them of a little talent!

Ah, gentlemen, I own I love talents and accomplishments; the feet

and hands of genius. As Burke said, “it is not only our duty to make

the right known, but to make it prevalent.” So I delight to see the

Godhead in distribution; to see men that can come at their ends. These

shrewd faculties belong to man. I love to see them in play, and to see

them trained: this memory carrying in its caves the pictures of all

the past, and rendering them in the instant when they can serve the

possessor;--the craft of mathematical combination, which carries a

working-plan of the heavens and of the earth in a formula. I am apt to

believe, with the Emperor Charles V., that “as many languages as a man

knows, so many times is he a man.” I like to see a man of that virtue

that no obscurity or disguise can conceal, who wins all souls to his

way of thinking. I delight in men adorned and weaponed with manlike

arts, who could alone, or with a few like them, reproduce Europe and

America, the result of our civilization.

It is excellent when the individual is ripened to that degree that

he touches both the centre and the circumference, so that he is not

only widely intelligent, but carries a council in his breast for the

emergency of to-day; and alternates the contemplation of the fact

in pure intellect, with the total conversion of the intellect into

energy; Jove, and the thunderbolt launched from his hand. Perhaps I

value power of achievement a little more because in America there

seems to be a certain indigence in this respect. I think there is no

more intellectual people than ours. They are very apprehensive and

curious. But there is a sterility of talent. These iron personalities,

such as in Greece and Italy and once in England were formed to strike

fear into kings and draw the eager service of thousands, rarely

appear. We have general intelligence, but no Cyclop arms. A very

little intellectual force makes a disproportionately great impression,

and when one observes how eagerly our people entertain and discuss

a new theory, whether home-born or imported, and how little thought

operates how great an effect, one would draw a favorable inference as

to their intellectual and spiritual tendencies. It seems as if two

or three persons coming who should add to a high spiritual aim great

constructive energy, would carry the country with them.

In making this claim of costly accomplishments for the scholar, I

chiefly wish to infer the dignity of his work by the lustre of his

appointments. He is not cheaply equipped. The universe was rifled to

furnish him. He is to forge out of coarsest ores the sharpest weapons.

But if the weapons are valued for themselves, if his talents assume

an independence, and come to work for ostentation, they cannot serve

him. It was said of an eminent Frenchman, that “he was drowned in his

talents.” The peril of every fine faculty is the delight of playing

with it for pride. Talent is commonly developed at the expense of

character, and the greater it grows, the more is the mischief and

misleading; so that presently all is wrong, talent is mistaken for

genius, a dogma or system for truth, ambition for greatness, ingenuity

for poetry, sensuality for art; and the young, coming up with innocent

hope, and looking around them at education, at the professions and

employments, at religious and literary teachers and teaching,--finding

that nothing outside corresponds to the noble order in the soul,

are confused, and become skeptical and forlorn. Hope is taken from

youth unless there be, by the grace of God, sufficient vigor in

their instinct to say, “All is wrong and human invention. I declare

anew from Heaven that truth exists new and beautiful and profitable

forevermore.” Order is heaven’s first law. These gifts, these senses,

these facilities are excellent as long as subordinated; all wasted and

mischievous when they assume to lead and not obey. What is the use of

strength or cunning or beauty, or musical voice, or birth, or breeding,

or money, to a maniac? Yet society, in which we live, is subject to

fits of frenzy; sometimes is for an age together a maniac, with birth,

breeding, beauty, cunning, strength and money. And there is but one

defence against this principle of chaos, and that is the principle of

order, or brave return at all hours to an infinite common-sense, to the

mother-wit, to the wise instinct, to the pure intellect.

When a man begins to dedicate himself to a particular function, as his

logical, or his remembering, or his oratorical, or his arithmetical

skill; the advance of his character and genius pauses; he has run to

the end of his line; seal the book; the development of that mind is

arrested. The scholar is lost in the showman. Society is babyish, and

is dazzled and deceived by the weapon, without inquiring into the cause

for which it is drawn; like boys by the drums and colors of the troops.

The objection of men of the world to what they call the morbid

intellectual tendency in our young men at present, is not a hostility

to their truth, but to this, its shortcoming, that the idealistic views

unfit their children for business in their sense, and do not qualify

them for any complete life of a better kind. They threaten the validity

of contracts, but do not prevail so far as to establish the new kingdom

which shall supersede contracts, oaths, and property. “We have seen to

weariness what you cannot do; now show us what you can and will do,”

asks the practical man, and with perfect reason.

Lectures and biographical sketches · 第 12 / 22 段