--The carriages of the army were entirely appropriated to the conveyance

of their booty; till, at last, the administrators of some departments

were under the necessity of forbidding such incumbrances: but the

officers, with whom restrictions of this sort were unavailing, put all

the horses and waggons of the country in requisition for similar

purposes, while they relaxed themselves from the serious business of the

war, (which indeed was nearly confined to burning, plundering, and

massacring the defenceless inhabitants,) by a numerous retinue of

mistresses and musicians.

It is not surprizing that generals and troops of this description were

constantly defeated; and their reiterated disasters might probably have

first suggested the idea of totally exterminating a people it was found

so difficult to subdue, and so impracticable to conciliate.--On the first

of October 1793, Barrere, after inveighing against the excessive

population of La Vendee, which he termed "frightful," proposed to the

Convention to proclaim by a decree, that the war of La Vendee "should be

terminated" by the twentieth of the same month. The Convention, with

barbarous folly, obeyed; and the enlightened Parisians, accustomed to

think with contempt on the ignorance of the Vendeans, believed that a

war, which had baffled the efforts of government for so many months, was

to end on a precise day--which Barrere had fixed with as much assurance

as though he had only been ordering a fete.

But the Convention and the government understood this decree in a very

different sense from the good people of Paris. The war was, indeed, to

be ended; not by the usual mode of combating armies, but by a total

extinction of all the inhabitants of the country, both innocent and

guilty--and Merlin de Thionville, with other members, so perfectly

comprehended this detestable project, that they already began to devise

schemes for repeopling La Vendee, when its miserable natives should be

destroyed.*

* It is for the credit of humanity to believe, that the decree was

not understood according to its real intention; but the nation has

to choose between the imputation of cruelty, stupidity, or slavery--

for they either approved the sense of the decree, believed what was

not possible, or were obliged to put on an appearance of both, in

spite of their senses and their feelings. A proclamation, in

consequence, to the army, is more explicit--"All the brigands of La

Vendee must be exterminated before the end of October."

From this time, the representatives on mission, commissaries of war,

officers, soldiers, and agents of every kind, vied with each other in the

most abominable outrages. Carrier superintended the fusillades and

noyades at Nantes, while Lequinio dispatched with his own hands a part of

the prisoners taken at La Fontenay, and projected the destruction of the

rest.--After the evacuation of Mans by the insurgents, women were brought

by twenties and thirties, and shot before the house where the deputies

Tureau and Bourbotte had taken up their residence; and it appears to have

been considered as a compliment to these republican Molochs, to surround

their habitation with mountains of the dead. A compliment of the like

nature was paid to the representative Prieur de la Marne,* by a

volunteer, who having learned that his own brother was taken amongst the

enemy, requested, by way of recommending himself to notice, a formal

permission to be his executioner.--The Roman stoicism of Prieur accepted

the implied homage, and granted the request!!

* This representative, who was also a member of the Committee of

Public Welfare, was not only the Brutus, but the Antony of La

Vendee; for we learn from the report of Benaben, that his stern

virtues were accompanied, through the whole of his mission in this

afflicted country, by a cortege of thirty strolling fiddlers!

Fourteen hundred prisoners, who had surrendered at Savenay, among whom

were many women and children, were shot, by order of the deputy

Francastel, who, together with Hentz, Richard, Choudieu, Carpentier, and

others of their colleagues, set an example of rapine and cruelty, but too

zealously imitated by their subordinate agents. In some places, the

inhabitants, without distinction of age or sex, were put indiscriminately

to the sword; in others, they were forced to carry the pillage collected

from their own dwellings, which, after being thus stripped, were

consigned to the flames.*

* "This conflagration accomplished, they had no sooner arrived in

the midst of our army, than the volunteers, in imitation of their

commanders, seized what little they had preserved, and massacred

them.--But this is not all: a whole municipality, in their scarfs of

office, were sacrificed; and at a little village, inhabited by about

fifty good patriots, who had been uniform in their resistance of the

insurgents, news is brought that their brother soldiers are coming

to assist them, and to revenge the wrongs they have suffered. A

friendly repast is provided, the military arrive, embrace their

ill-fated hosts, and devour what they have provided; which is no

sooner done, than they drive all these poor people into the

churchyard, and stab them one after another."

Report of Faure, Vice-President of a Military Commission at

Fontenay.

--The heads of the prisoners served occasionally as marks for the

officers to shoot at for trifling wagers, and the soldiers, who imitated

these heinous examples, used to conduct whole hundreds to the place of

execution, singing _"allons enfans de la patrie."_*

* Woe to those who were unable to walk, for, under pretext that

carriages could not be found to convey them, they were shot without

hesitation!--Benaben.

The insurgents had lost Cholet, Chatillon, Mortagne, &c. Yet, far from

being vanquished by the day appointed, they had crossed the Loire in

great force, and, having traversed Brittany, were preparing to make an

attack on Granville. But this did not prevent Barrere from announcing to

the convention, that La Vendee was no more, and the galleries echoed with

applauses, when they were told that the highways were impassable, from

the numbers of the dead, and that a considerable part of France was one

vast cemetery. This intelligence also tranquillized the paternal

solicitude of the legislature, and, for many months, while the system of

depopulation was pursued with the most barbarous fury, it was not

permissible even to suspect that the war was yet unextinguished.

It is only since the trial of the Nantais, that the state of La Vendee

has again become a subject of discussion: truth has now forced its way,

and we learn, that, whatever may be the strength of these unhappy people,

their minds, embittered by suffering, and animated by revenge, are still

less than ever disposed to submit to the republican government. The

design of total extirpation, once so much insisted on, is at present said

to be relinquished, and a plan of instruction and conversion is to be

substituted for bayonets and conflagrations. The revolted countries are

to be enlightened by the doctrines of liberty, fanaticism is to be

exposed, and a love of the republic to succeed the prejudices in favour

of Kings and Nobles.--To promote these objects, is, undoubtedly, the real

interest of the Convention; but a moralist, who observes through another

medium, may compare with regret and indignation the instructors with the

people they are to illumine, and the advantages of philosophy over

ignorance.

Lequinio, one of the most determined reformers of the barbarism of La

Vendee, proposes two methods: the first is, a general massacre of all the

natives--and the only objection it seems susceptible of in his opinion

is, their numbers; but as he thinks on this account it may be attended

with difficulty, he is for establishing a sort of perpetual mission of

Representatives, who, by the influence of good living and a company of

fiddlers and singers, are to restore the whole country to peace.*--

*"The only difficulty that presents itself is, to determine whether

recourse shall be had to the alternative of indulgence, or if it

will not be more advantageous to persist in the plan of total

destruction.

"If the people that still remain were not more than thirty or forty

thousand, the shortest way would doubtless be, to cut all their

throats (egorger), agreeably to my first opinion; but the population

is immense, amounting still to four hundred thousand souls.--If

there were no hope of succeeding by any other methods, certainly it

were better to kill all (egorger), even were there five hundred

thousand.

"But what are we to understand by measures of rigour? Is there no

distinction to be made between rigorous and barbarous measures? The

utmost severity is justified on the plea of the general good, but

nothing can justify barbarity. If the welfare of France

necessitated the sacrifice of the four hundred thousand inhabitants

of La Vendee, and the countries in rebellion adjoining, they ought

to be sacrificed: but, even in this case, there would be no excuse

for those atrocities which revolt nature, which are an outrage to

social order, and repugnant equally to feeling (sentiment) and

reason; and in cutting off so many entire generations for the good

of the country, we ought not to suffer the use of barbarous means in

a single instance.

"Now the most effectual way to arrive at this end (converting the

people), would be by joyous and fraternal missions, frank and

familiar harangues, civic repasts, and, above all, dancing.

"I could wish, too, that during their circuits in these countries,

the Representatives were always attended by musicians. The expence

would be trifling, compared with the good effect; if, as I am

strongly persuaded, we could thus succeed in giving a turn to the

public mind, and close the bleeding arteries of these fertile and

unhappy provinces."

Lequinio, Guerre de La Vendee.

And this people, who were either to have their throats cut, or be

republicanized by means of singing, dancing, and revolutionary Pans

and Silenus's, already beheld their property devastated by pillage

or conflagration, and were in danger of a pestilence from the

unburied bodies of their families.--Let the reader, who has seen

Lequinio's pamphlet, compare his account of the sufferings of the

Vendeans, and his project for conciliating them. They convey a

strong idea of the levity of the national character; but, in this

instance, I must suppose, that nature would be superior to local

influence; and I doubt if Lequinio's jocund philosophy will ever

succeed in attaching the Vendeans to the republic.

--Camille Desmouins, a republican reformer, nearly as sanguinary, though

not more liberal, thought the guillotine disgraced by such ignorant prey,

and that it were better to hunt them down like wild beasts; or, if made

prisoners, to exchange them against the cattle of their country!--The

eminently informed Herault de Sechelles was the patron and confidant of

the exterminating reforms of Carrier; and Carnot, when the mode of

reforming by noyades and fusillades was debated at the Committee, pleaded

the cause of Carrier, whom he describes as a good, nay, an excellent

patriot.--Merlin de Thionville, whose philosophy is of a more martial

cast, was desirous that the natives of La Vendee should be completely

annihilated, in order to furnish in their territory and habitations a

recompence for the armies.--Almost every member of the Convention has

individually avowed principles, or committed acts, from which common

turpitude would recoil, and, as a legislative body, their whole code has

been one unvarying subversion of morals and humanity. Such are the men

who value themselves on possessing all the advantages the Vendeans are

pretended to be in want of.--We will now examine what disciples they have

produced, and the benefits which have been derived from their

instructions.

Every part of France remarkable for an early proselytism to the

revolutionary doctrines has been the theatre of crimes unparalleled in

the annals of human nature. Those who have most boasted their contempt

for religious superstition have been degraded by an idolatry as gross as

any ever practiced on the Nile; and the most enthusiastic republicans

have, without daring to murmur, submitted for two years successively to a

horde of cruel and immoral tyrants.--A pretended enfranchisement from

political and ecclesiastical slavery has been the signal of the lowest

debasement, and the most cruel profligacy: the very Catechumens of

freedom and philosophy have, while yet in their first rudiments,

distinguished themselves as proficients in the arts of oppression and

servility, of intolerance and licentiousness.--Paris, the rendezvous of

all the persecuted patriots and philosophers in Europe, the centre of the

revolutionary system, whose inhabitants were illumined by the first rays

of modern republicanism, and who claim a sort of property in the rights

of man, as being the original inventors, may fairly be quoted as an

example of the benefits that would accrue from a farther dissemination of

the new tenets.

Without reverting to the events of August and September, 1792, presided

by the founders of liberty, and executed by their too apt sectaries, it

is notorious that the legions of Paris, sent to chastise the

unenlightened Vendeans, were the most cruel and rapacious banditti that

ever were let loose to afflict the world. Yet, while they exercised this

savage oppression in the countries near the Loire, their fellow-citizens

on the banks of the Seine crouched at the frown of paltry tyrants, and

were unresistingly dragged to dungeons, or butchered by hundreds on the

scaffold.--At Marseilles, Lyons, Bourdeaux, Arras, wherever these baleful

principles have made converts, they have made criminals and victims; and

those who have been most eager in imbibing or propagating them have, by a

natural and just retribution, been the first sacrificed. The new

discoveries in politics have produced some in ethics not less novel, and

until the adoption of revolutionary doctrines, the extent of human

submission or human depravity was fortunately unknown.

In this source of guilt and misery the people of La Vendee are now to be

instructed--that people, who are acknowledged to be hospitable, humane,

and laborious, and whose ideas of freedom may be better estimated by

their resistance to a despotism which the rest of France has sunk under,

than by the jargon of pretended reformers.--I could wish, that not only

the peasants of La Vendee, but those of all other countries, might for

ever remain strangers to such pernicious knowledge. It is sufficient for

this useful class of men to be taught the simple precepts of religion and

morality, and those who would teach them more, are not their benefactors.

Our age is, indeed, a literary age, and such pursuits are both liberal

and laudable in the rich and idle; but why should volumes of politics or

philosophy be mutilated and frittered into pamphlets, to inspire a

disgust for labour, and a taste for study or pleasure, in those to whom

such disgusts or inclinations are fatal. The spirit of one author is

extracted, and the beauties of another are selected, only to bewilder the

understanding, and engross the time, of those who might be more

profitably employed.

I know I may be censured as illiberal; but I have, during my abode in

this country, sufficiently witnessed the disastrous effects of corrupting

a people through their amusements or curiosity, and of making men neglect

their useful callings to become patriots and philosophers.*--

*This right of directing public affairs, and neglecting their own,

we may suppose essential to republicans of the lower orders, since

we find the following sentence of transportation in the registers of

a popular commission:

"Bergeron, a dealer in skins--suspected--having done nothing in

favour of the revolution--extremely selfish (egoiste,) and blaming

the Sans-Culottes for neglecting their callings, that they may

attend only to public concerns."--Signed by the members of the

Commission and the two Committees.

--_"Il est dangereux d'apprendre au peuple a raisonner: il ne faut pas

l'eclairer trop, parce qu'il n'est pas possible de l'eclairer assez."_

["It is dangerous to teach the people to reason--they should not be too

much enlightened, because it is not possible to enlighten them

sufficiently."]--When the enthusiasm of Rousseau's genius was thus

usefully submitted to his good sense and knowledge of mankind, he little

expected every hamlet in France would be inundated with scraps of the

contrat social, and thousands of inoffensive peasants massacred for not

understanding the Profession de Foi.

The arguments of mistaken philanthropists or designing politicians may

divert the order of things, but they cannot change our nature--they may

create an universal taste for literature, but they will never unite it

with habits of industry; and until they prove how men are to live without

labour, they have no right to banish the chearful vacuity which usually

accompanies it, by substituting reflections to make it irksome, and

propensities with which it is incompatible.

The situation of France has amply demonstrated the folly of attempting to

make a whole people reasoners and politicians--there seems to be no

medium; and as it is impossible to make a nation of sages, you let loose

a horde of savages: for the philosophy which teaches a contempt for

accustomed restraints, is not difficult to propagate; but that superior

kind, which enables men to supply them, by subduing the passions that

render restraints necessary, is of slow progress, and never can be

general.

I have made the war of La Vendee more a subject of reflection than

narrative, and have purposely avoided military details, which would be

not only uninteresting, but disgusting. You would learn no more from

these desultory hostilities, than that the defeats of the republican

armies were, if possible, more sanguinary than their victories; that the

royalists, who began the war with humanity, were at length irritated to

reprisals; and that more than two hundred thousand lives have already

been sacrificed in the contest, yet undecided.

Amiens, Oct. 24, 1794.

Revolutions, like every thing else in France, are a mode, and the

Convention already commemorate four since 1789: that of July 1789, which

rendered the monarchical power nugatory; that of August the 10th, 1792,

which subverted it; the expulsion of the Brissotins, in May 1793; and the

death of Robespierre, in July 1794.

The people, accustomed, from their earliest knowledge, to respect the

person and authority of the King, felt that the events of the two first

epochs, which disgraced the one and annihilated the other, were violent

and important revolutions; and, as language which expresses the public

sentiment is readily adopted, it soon became usual to speak of these

events as the revolutions of July and August.

The thirty-first of May has always been viewed in a very different light,

for it was not easy to make the people at large comprehend how the

succession of Robespierre and Danton to Brissot and Roland could be

considered as a revolution, more especially as it appeared evident that

the principles of one party actuated the government of the other. Every

town had its many-headed monster to represent the defeat of the

Foederalists, and its mountain to proclaim the triumph of their enemies

the Mountaineers; but these political hieroglyphics were little

understood, and the merits of the factions they alluded to little

distinguished--so that the revolution of the thirty-first of May was

rather a party aera, than a popular one.

The fall of Robespierre would have made as little impression as that of

the Girondists, if some melioration of the revolutionary system had not

succeeded it; and it is in fact only since the public voice, and the

interest of the Convention, have occasioned a change approaching to

reform, that the death of Robespierre is really considered as a benefit.

But what was in itself no more than a warfare of factions, may now, if

estimated by its consequences, be pronounced a revolution of infinite

importance. The Jacobins, whom their declining power only rendered more

insolent and daring, have at length obliged the Convention to take

decided measures against them, and they are now subject to such

regulations as must effectually diminish their influence, and, in the

end, dissolve their whole combination. They can no longer correspond as

societies, and the mischievous union which constituted their chief force,

can scarcely be supported for any time under the present restrictions.*

* "All affiliations, aggregations, and foederations, as well as

correspondences carried on collectively between societies, under

whatever denomination they may exist, are henceforth prohibited, as

being subversive of government, and contrary to the unity of the

republic.

"Those persons who sign as presidents or secretaries, petitions or

addresses in a collective form, shall be arrested and confined as

suspicious, &c. &c.--Whoever offends in any shape against the

present law, will incur the same penalty."

The whole of the decree is in the same spirit. The immediate and

avowed pretext for this measure was, that the popular societies, who

have of late only sent petitions disagreeable to the Convention, did

not express the sense of the people. Yet the deposition of the

King, and the establishment of the republic, had no other sanction

than the adherence of these clubs, who are now allowed not to be the

nation, and whose very existence as then constituted is declared to

be subversive of government.

It is not improbable, that the Convention, by suffering the clubs still

to exist, after reducing them to nullity, may hope to preserve the

institution as a future resource against the people, while it represses

their immediate efforts against itself. The Brissotins would have

attempted a similar policy, but they had nothing to oppose to the

Jacobins, except their personal influence. Brissot and Roland took part

with the clubs, as they approved the massacres of August and September,

just as far as it answered their purpose; and when they were abandoned by

the one, and the other were found to incur an unprofitable odium, they

acted the part which Tallien and Freron act now under the same

circumstances, and would willingly have promoted the destruction of a

power which had become inimical to them.*--

* Brissot and Roland were more pernicious as Jacobins than the most

furious of their successors. If they did not in person excite the

people to the commission of crimes, they corrupted them, and made

them fit instruments for the crimes of others. Brissot might affect

to condemn the massacres of September in the gross, but he is known

to have enquired with eager impatience, and in a tone which implied

he had reasons for expecting it, whether De Morande, an enemy he

wished to be released from, was among the murdered.

--Their imitators, without possessing more honesty, either political or

moral, are more fortunate; and not only Tallien and Freron, who since

their expulsion from the Jacobins have become their most active enemies,

are now in a manner popular, but even the whole Convention is much less

detested than it was before.

It is the singular felicity of the Assembly to derive a sort of

popularity from the very excesses it has occasioned or sanctioned, and

which, it was natural to suppose, would have consigned it for ever to

vengeance or obloquy; but the past sufferings of the people have taught

them to be moderate in their expectations; and the name of their

representation has been so connected with tyranny of every sort, that it

appears an extraordinary forbearance when the usual operations of

guillotines and mandates of arrest are suspended.

Thus, though the Convention have not in effect repaired a thousandth part

of their own acts of injustice, or done any good except from necessity,

they are overwhelmed with applauding addresses, and affectionate

injunctions not to quit their post. What is still more wonderful, many

of these are sincere; and Tallien, Freron, Legendre, &c. with all their

revolutionary enormities on their heads, are now the heroes of the

reviving aristocrats.

A Residence in France During the Years 1792, 1793, 1794 and 1795, Part III., 1794 Described in a Series of Letters from an English Lady: with General and Incidental Remarks on the French Character and Manners · 第 12 / 17 段