SCABS

In C---- in 1910 thousands of workers in the clothing industry struck

for better wages. They were mostly newly-arrived immigrants, all of them

skilled workingmen, and though the manufacturers were making millions

and advertised that they employed only the best skilled labour, the

workers, men and women, and their families, starved.

A shameful system of task work was established, whereby contractors

sublet their work to sub-contractors, and these to other contractors,

and the workers were kept at piece work. Many of them worked from

six A. M. until midnight, in dirty, dingy sweatshops and at the end of

the week they received seven or eight dollars. Even this small sum was

not assured. It happened more than once that the sub-contractor, for

whom the men worked, simply disappeared with the pay of all the men. As

they were not engaged by the firm they could not ask the manufacturer to

pay them, and had to go hungry, they, their wives and their children.

Such conditions lasted a good many years, until at last, in 1910, the

men organised and struck to abolish the sub-contracting system and the

piece work which led to it. The men struck for a minimum wage, a fixed

working hour and sanitary factory conditions. They also wanted to know

for whom they were working. To obtain such necessary and elementary

rights they were compelled to stay out several months, entailing great

suffering from hunger and cold.

In every strike the manufacturers use strike-breakers. Sometimes, in

America, the students of the colleges go to scab, to protect the right

of _free labour_, they claim. In the clothing industry skilled workers

are used. The students could not execute the work, and among the skilled

tailors there was not one mean enough to scab.

Each charity institution also keeps an employment bureau. The men and

women they send to work are always paid the most wretched wages, and

they work to the last notch of their endurance. For work that has

hitherto been paid twelve dollars per week the man who comes recommended

by the charities receives not more than six dollars. Of him twice as

much work is expected. He is not supposed to lift his head or speak or

smile. He must always look humble, wretched, submissive. He must make it

appear that his work is worth much less than he gets. He must look to

his employer as to the Saviour, because he has been sent by the

charities. The fact that he appealed to the charities is a proof that he

is a failure, also a proof that the man has nothing to depend upon; no

brother, sister or friend that could help. The employers demanding help

from the employment office are all "subscribers"--they contribute a

certain sum to the institution. For this and other services rendered,

they are given a little white plate with black letters to nail on the

door, which reads: "Member of organised charity." This acts like a

talisman. It drives away the hungry and needy.

If you were to stay a half hour in the private sanctum of the manager of

the bureau you would hear such telephonic conversation:

"Is this Mr. So and So?"

"How is our man getting on?"

"Well, if he does not suit you we'll send you another one."

"We have plenty of schnorrers (beggars) around here."

"That's how they all are--lazy. They want money, not work."

Five minutes later another man is sent. The employment office is not for

the benefit of the poor, but to be of service to the rich, to lower the

pride of the workingman. During the strike of the cloak makers the

telephone of the bureau was continually ringing. The manufacturers

demanded help. When any one applied for charity the first question put

was: "Are you a tailor?" And they did not believe the man or woman who

said "No." If they discovered a tailor there was rejoicing in the

Institution and Mr. X. or Mr. Z., a clothing manufacturer, was called up

and told the glad tidings. "We are sending you a man."

Thus does organised charity work to break a strike of men who are

demanding living wages; a strike where the poor suffer so that their

children may live a decent life.

The records of the institution were looked up, and every man and woman

who was thought to have had a connection with the needle at any time of

his life, or who could operate a sewing machine, was singled out and the

order to "cut off" was given. A few days later, men old and broken, sick

and worn out women and consumptive girls, were thronging the halls of

the institution. They cried and begged and showed handkerchiefs red with

the blood of their wounded lungs. There they were with their swollen

eyes and hands crippled from the toil of former years. But like the herd

of cattle from the slaughter-house, serving only one purpose as far as

the man with the long knife is concerned, so were they all, slowly but

surely, driven upstairs to the employment office, from where they were

escorted to the shops, to finish their days slaving at the machine to

enrich the donors of the institution and help in the good work of

starving into submission their brothers and sisters on strike for living

wages.

When I protested and asked why this was done they said:

"Is this institution kept up by the poor, by the workingman, or by the

donations of the rich manufacturers?" And then again I asked:

"But _for whom_ is it kept up?" to which I was answered by sneers and

shrugs and laughter.

And the thousands of workers knew not from where these poor starved men

came and they fought against them and blood was spilled--blood that

otherwise trickled slowly away on the handkerchiefs, on the waste, and

was wiped off the mouth with the linen from which garments were

manufactured.

When the strike was at an end and the victorious workingmen returned to

their places, the scabs were sent away. Again they were restored to the

pension list or sent to the sanatorium, but in a few months, when the

leaves began to fall from the trees, the list was reduced to half--men

and women had gone to their graves.

But the charity institutions had their subscription list increased, for

the rich had learned to know what a strong support they had in

organised pity. Walk now through the clothing district of a city, and

on each and every door you will see the white enamel sign, with black

letters: "Members of the organised charities." It is written with

blood--with the same red, bloody letters in which the sign of the house

on the road is written:

"Ye poor of the land come and warm your bodies."

Only, instead of the stove, there is a sewing machine, a pressing iron,

a drilling machine, and the devil laughs and laughs and shows his white

teeth.

"Has ever man built a better place for me!"

Crimes of Charity · 第 53 / 85 题