_spiritualism_ for _spiritism_, and spiritual for spirital or
spiritalistic. Spiritualism is appropriated to designate a system of
philosophy opposed to sensism or materialism, and spiritual stands
opposed to sensual or carnal, and is too holy a term to be applied to
spirit-rapping, table-tipping, and other antics of the spirits. Mr.
Owen is unhappy in naming his books. He holds that the universe is
governed by inflexible, immutable, and imperishable physical laws;
that all events or manifestations take place by the agency of these
laws; that the future is only the continuation and development of the
present; and that death is only the throwing off of one’s overcoat,
and the life after death is the identical life, without any
interruption, that we now live. We see not well how he can assert
another world, or a debatable land between this world and the next. If
all things and all events are produced by the agency of natural laws,
and those laws are universal and unchangeable, we are unable to
conceive any world above or beyond nature, or any world in any sense
distinguishable from the present natural world. His books are
therefore decidedly misnamed, and so named as to imply the existence
of another world and a world after this, which cannot on his
principles be true.
Mr. Owen’s first book was mainly intended to establish the fact and to
show the character of the spirit-manifestations; in his last work, his
design is to show that these manifestations take place by virtue of
the physical law of the universe, that they are of the same nature and
origin with the Christian miracles, inspiration, and revelation, and
are simply supplementary to them, or designed to continue, augment,
and develop them; and to show, especially to Protestants, that, if
they mean to make theology a progressive science, and win the victory
over their enemy the Catholic Church, they must call in the spirits to 804
their aid, and accept and profit by their inspirations and
revelations.
This shows that the author leans to Protestantism, and seeks its
triumph over Catholicity; or that he regards Protestantism as offering
a more congenial soil for the seed he would sow than the old church
with her hierarchy and infallibility. Certainly, he holds that, as it
is, Protestantism is losing ground. In 1580 it held the vast majority
of the people of Europe, but is now only a feeble minority. Even in
this country, he says, if Catholics continue to increase for a third
of a century to come in the same ratio that they have for the last
three-fourths of a century, they will have a decided majority. As
things now go, the whole world will become Catholic, and the only way
to prevent it, he thinks, is to accept the aid of the spirits. We are
not so sure that this aid would suffice, for Satan, their chief, has
been the fast friend of Protestants ever since he persuaded Luther to
give up private Masses, and has done his best for them, and it is
difficult to see what more he can do for them than he has hitherto
done.
Mr. Owen, since he holds the spirit-manifestations take place by a
natural law, always operative, and always producing the same effects
in the same or like favorable circumstances, of course cannot
recognize in them anything miraculous or supernatural; and, as he
holds the alleged Christian miracles, the wonderful things recorded in
the Old and New Testaments, are of the same order, and produced by the
same agency, he, while freely admitting them as facts, denies their
miraculous or supernatural character. He thinks that the circumstances
when these extraordinary events occurred were favorable to
spirit-manifestations; the age was exceedingly ignorant,
superstitious, and semi-barbarous, and needed new accessions of light
and truth, and the spirits, through our Lord and his apostles as
medium--God forgive us for repeating the blasphemy--made such
revelations as that age most needed or could bear or assimilate. This
age also needs further revelations of truth, especially to enable it
to throw off the incubus of a fixed, permanent, non-progressive,
infallible church, and secure an open field, and a final victory for
the rational religion and progressive theology implied in the
Protestant Reformation. So the spirits once more kindly come to our
assistance, and reveal to us such further portions of truth as man is
prepared for and especially needs. Very generous in them.
This is the doctrine, briefly and faithfully stated, of Mr. Owen’s
_Debatable Land_, which he sets forth with a charming _naïveté_, and
a self-complacency little short of the sublime. There is this to be
said in his favor--the devil speaks better English through him than
through the majority of the mediums he seems compelled to use; yet not
much better sense. But what new light have the spirits shed over the
great problems of life and death, time and eternity, good and evil, or
what new revelations of truth have they made? Here is the author’s
summary of their teaching:
“1. This is a world governed by a God of love and mercy, in which
all things work together for good to those who reverently conform
to his eternal laws.
“2. In strictness there is no death. Life continues from the life
which now is into that which is to come, even as it continues
from one day to another; the sleep which goes by the name of
death being but a brief transition-slumber, from which, for the
good, the awakening is immeasurably more glorious than is the
dawn of earthly morning, the brightest that ever shone. In all 805
cases in which life is well-spent, the change which men are wont
to call death is God’s last and best gift to his creatures here.
“3. The earth-phase of life is an essential preparation for the
life which is to come. Its appropriate duties and callings cannot
be neglected without injury to human welfare and development,
both in this world and in the next. Even its enjoyments,
temperately accepted, are fit preludes to the happiness of a
higher state.
“4. The phase of life which follows the death-change is, in
strictest sense, the supplement of that which precedes it. It has
the same variety of avocations, duties, enjoyments,
corresponding, in a measure, to those of earth, but far more
elevated; and its denizens have the same variety of character and
of intelligence; existing, too, as men do here, in a state of
progress. Released from bodily earth-clog, their periscope is
wider, their perceptions more acute, their spiritual knowledge
much greater, their judgment clearer, their progress more rapid,
than ours. Vastly wiser and more dispassionate than we, they are
still, however, fallible; and they are governed by the same
general laws of being, modified only by corporal _disenthralment_,
to which they were _subjected_ here.
“5. Our state here determines our initial state there. The
habitual promptings, the pervading impulses, the lifelong
yearnings, in a word the moving spirit, or what Swedenborg calls
the ‘ruling loves’ of man--these decide his condition on entering
the next world: not the written articles of his creed, nor yet
the incidental errors of his life.
“6. We do not, either by faith or works, _earn_ heaven, nor are
we sentenced, on any day of wrath, to hell. In the next world we
simply gravitate to the position for which, by life on earth, we
have fitted ourselves; and we occupy that position _because_ we
are fitted for it.
“7. There is no instantaneous change of character when we pass
from the present phase of life. Our virtues, our vices; our
intelligence, our ignorance; our aspirations, our grovellings;
our habits, propensities, prejudices even--all pass over with us:
modified, doubtless (_but to what extent we know not_), when the
spiritual body emerges, divested of its fleshly encumbrance; yet
essentially the same as when the death slumber came over us.
“8. The sufferings there, natural sequents of evil-doing and
evil-thinking here, are as various in character and in degree as
the enjoyments; but they are mental, not bodily. There is no
escape from them, except only, as on earth, by the door of
repentance. There as here, sorrow for sin committed and desire
for an amended life are the in dispensable conditions-precedent
of advancement to a better state of being.
“9. In the next world love ranks higher than what we call wisdom;
being itself the highest wisdom. There deeds of benevolence far
outweigh professions of faith. There simple goodness rates above
intellectual power. There the humble are exalted. There the meek
find their heritage. There the merciful obtain mercy. The better
denizens of that world are charitable to frailty, and
compassionate to sin far beyond the dwellers in this: they
forgive the erring brethren they have left behind them, even to
seventy times seven. There, is no respect of persons. There, too,
self-righteousness is rebuked and pride brought low.
“10. A trustful, childlike spirit is the state of mind in which
men are most receptive of beneficent spiritual impressions; and
such a spirit is the best preparation for entrance into the next
world.
“11. There have always existed intermundane laws, according to
which men may occasionally obtain, under certain conditions,
revealings from those who have passed to the next world before
them. A certain proportion of human beings are more sensitive to
spiritual perceptions and influences than their fellows; and it
is usually in the presence, or through the medium, of one or more
of these, that ultramundane intercourse occurs.
“12. When the conditions are favorable, and the sensitive through
whom the manifestations come is highly gifted, these may supply
important materials for thought and valuable rules of conduct.
But spiritual phenomena sometimes do much more than this. In
their highest phases they furnish proof, strong as that which
Christ’s disciples enjoyed--proof addressed to the reason and
tangible to the senses--of the reality of another life, better
and happier than this, and of which our earthly pilgrimage is
but the novitiate. They bring immortality to light under a blaze 806
of evidence which outshines, as the sun the stars, all
traditional or historical testimonies. For surmise they give us
conviction, and assured knowledge for wavering belief.
“13. The chief motives which induce spirits to communicate with
men appear to be--a benevolent desire to convince us, past doubt
or denial, that there _is_ a world to come; now and then, the
attraction of unpleasant memories, such as murder or suicide;
sometimes (in the worldly-minded) the earth-binding influence of
cumber and trouble: but, far more frequently, the divine impulse
of human affections, seeking the good of the loved ones it has
left behind, and, at times, drawn down, perhaps, by their
yearning cries.
“14. Under unfavorable or imperfect conditions, spiritual
communications, how honestly reported soever, often prove vapid
and valueless; and this chiefly happens when communications are
too assiduously sought or continuously persisted in: brief
volunteered messages being the most trustworthy. Imprudence,
inexperience, supineness, or the idiosyncrasy of the recipient
may occasionally result in arbitrary control by spirits of a low
order; as men here sometimes yield to the infatuation exerted by
evil associates. Or, again, there may be exerted by the inquirer,
especially if dogmatic and self-willed, a dominating influence
over the medium, so strong as to produce effects that might be
readily mistaken for what has been called possession. As a
general rule, however, any person of common intelligence and
ordinary will can, in either case, cast off such mischievous
control: or, if the weak or incautious give way, one who may not
improperly be called an exorcist--if possessed of strong magnetic
will, moved by benevolence, and it may be aided by prayer, can
usually rid, or at least assist to rid, the sensitive from such
abnormal influence.”--(_Debatable Land_, pp. 171-176.)
We have no intention of criticising this creed of the spirits as set
forth by their learned medium. It is heathen, not Christian, and we
have discovered in it nothing new, true or false. It denies the
essential points of the Christian faith, and what few things it affirms
that Christianity denies are affirmed on no trustworthy or sufficient
authority. A man must have little knowledge of human nature, and have
felt little of the needs, desires, and aspirations of the human soul,
who can be satisfied with this spirits-creed. In it all is vague,
indefinite, and as empty as the shades the heathen imagined to be
wandering up and down on this side the Styx. But in it we find a
statement that dispenses us from the necessity of examining and
refuting it. In Article 4 we find it said: “Vastly wiser and more
dispassionate than we, they [the spirits] are still, however,
_fallible_.”
Whether the spirits are wiser and more dispassionate than we or not
may be questioned; they do not seem to be so in the author’s
illustrative narrations, and the fact that they have undergone no
essential change by throwing off their overcoat of flesh, and living
the same life they lived here, and are in the sphere for which they
were fitted before entering the spirit-land, renders the matter
somewhat doubtful, to say the least. But it is conceded that they are
_fallible_. Who or what, then, vouches for the fact that they are not
themselves deceived, or that they do not seek to deceive us? By
acknowledging the fallibility of the spirits, Mr. Owen acknowledges
that their testimony, in all cases, when we can have nothing else on
which to rely, is perfectly worthless. We can bring it to no crucial
test, and we have no vouchers either for their knowledge or their
honesty. Even supposing them to be what they profess to be, which we
by no means concede, it were sheer credulity to take their word for
anything not otherwise verifiable.
Mr. Owen and all the spiritists tell us that the spirit-manifestations
prove undeniably the immortality of the soul; but they prove nothing 807
of the sort. We need, in the first place, no ghost from hell to assure
us that the immortality of the soul follows necessarily from the
immateriality of the soul; for that is demonstrable from reason, and
was generally believed by the heathen. What was not believed by the
heathen, and is not provable by reason, is the Christian doctrine of
the resurrection; and this, and supernatural life and immortality, the
spirits do not even pretend to teach. Look through Mr. Owen’s
statement of their teaching, and you will find no hint of the
“resurrectionem carnis” or “vitam æternam” of the apostolic symbol.
Are we to reject the doctrine of the resurrection of the body, and the
life and immortality brought to light through the Gospel--which is
something far different from a simple continuation of the soul’s
physical existence--a doctrine so necessary to virtue, and so dear and
consoling to the afflicted, on the authority of fallible spirits,
whose knowledge or veracity nothing vouches for, and who prove
themselves not seldom to be lying spirits?
In the second place, what proof have we that those rapping or
table-tipping spirits are the spirits of men and women once in the
flesh? Mr. Owen undertakes to establish their identity, but he does
not do it and cannot do it; for no proof in the case is possible
except by a miracle, and miracles the author rejects, and declares
the argument from them in all cases a _non-sequitur_. The
spirit-manifestations of which the spiritists make so much, and in
which they fancy they have a new inspiration and revelation, are
nothing new in history, and are not more frequent now than they have
been at various other epochs. They were more common amongst the
polished pagan Greeks and Romans than they are in any real or nominally
Christian nation now. They are nothing new or peculiar to our times.
Tertullian speaks of them, the author of the _Clementine Recognitions_
was acquainted with them, and so was St. Augustine. The trance was one
of the five faculties or states of the soul recognized by the
Neo-Platonists, and was the principle of the Alexandrine theurgy. The
church has in every age encountered them, been obliged to deal with
them, and she has uniformly ascribed them to Satan and his angels. She
has had from the first, and still has, her forms of exorcism against
them, to cast them out, and relieve those who are troubled by them.
Every day she in some locality even now exorcises them, compels them
to acknowledge the power of the name of Jesus, and sends them back
discomfited to hell.
The spiritists cannot say the doctrine of the church is impossible or
prove that it is not true. It certainly is a possible hypothesis, if
nothing more. Then spiritists cannot say that Satan does not personify
the spirits of the departed, or that it is not Satan or some one of
his angels that speaks in those pretending to be the spirit of
Washington, of Jefferson, of Franklin, of Shakespeare, of Milton, of
Byron, or of some near and dear deceased relative? You must prove that
it is not so, before you can affirm the identity claimed. The great
Tichborne case now before the English courts proves that it is no easy
matter to establish one’s own identity even while in the flesh, and it
must be much more difficult for a ghost, which is not even visible.
The spiritists admit that the spirits are fallible; that there are
among them lying, malevolent spirits. A gentleman with whom we were
well acquainted, a firm believer in the spirits, and himself a medium,
holding frequent communications with them, assured us that he held 808
them to be evil spirits, and knew them to be lying spirits. “I asked
them,” he said, “at an interview with them, if they could tell me
where my sister then was. ‘Your sister,’ I was answered, ‘has some
time since entered the spirit-world, and is now in the third circle.’
It was false: my sister was alive and well, and I knew it. I told them
so, and that they lied; and they laughed at me: and then I asked whose
spirit was speaking with me. I was answered, ‘Voltaire.’ ‘That is a
lie, too, is it not?’ Another laugh, or chuckle rather. “I assure
you,” said our friend, “one can place no confidence in what they say.
In my intercourse with them, I have found them a pack of liars.”
This pretension of the spiritists that the spirits that manifest
themselves through nervous, sickly, half-crazy mediums, or mediums
confessedly in an abnormal or exceptional state, are really spirits
who once lived in the flesh, is not sustainable; for they cannot be
relied on, and nothing hinders us from holding them to be devils or
evil demons, personating the spirits of deceased persons, as the
church has always taught us. This, certainly, is very possible, and
the character of the manifestations themselves favors such an
interpretation; for only devils, and very silly devils too, dealing
with very ignorant, superstitious, and credulous people, would mingle
so much of the ludicrous and ridiculous in their manifestations, as
the thumping, knocking, rollicking spirits, tipping over chairs and
tables, and creating a sort of universal hubbub wherever they come.
The spirits of the dead, if permitted at all to communicate with the
living for any good purpose, we may well believe, would be permitted
to do it more quietly, more gravely, and in a more open and direct
way; it is only the devil or his subjects that would turn all their
grave communications into ridicule by their antics or comic
accompaniments. These considerations, added to the fact that the
spirits communicate nothing not otherwise known or knowable, that is
not demonstrably false, and that they tell us nothing very clear or
definite about the condition of departed souls, nothing but what their
consultors are predisposed to believe, convince us that, if they prove
the existence of powers in some sense superhuman, they prove nothing
for or against the reality of a life after this life. They leave the
question of life and immortality, of good and evil, rewards and
punishments, heaven and hell, where they were.
Mr. Owen places the spirit manifestations, and the Biblical miracles,
and Christian inspiration and revelation, in the same category,
attributes them all alike to the agency of the spirits, and thinks he
has discovered a way in which one may accept the extraordinary events
and doings recorded in the Old and New Testaments as historical facts,
without being obliged to recognize them as miracles. This is absurd.
The resemblance between the two classes of facts is far less than
honest Fluellen’s resemblance of Harry of Monmouth to Alexander of
Macedon, “There is a river in Macedon, so is there a river also in
Wales.” The man who can detect any relation between the two classes of
facts, but that of dissimilarity and contrast, is the very man to
believe in the spirit-revelations, to mistake evil for good, darkness
for light, and the devil for God. We find both classes of facts in the
New Testament. The Christian miracles are all marked by an air of
quiet power. There is no bluster, no rage, no foaming at the mouth,
no fierceness of look or gesture, no falling, or rending, as in the 809
case of the demoniacs; and no rapping, no table-tipping, no antics, no
stammering, no half-utterances, no convulsions, no disturbance, as in
the case of the spirit-manifestations described by Mr. Owen in his
books. In the one case, all is calm and serene, pure and holy; there
is no effort, no straining, but a simple, normal exercise of power.
Our Lord rebukes the winds and the waves, and there comes a great
calm; he speaks, the leper is cleansed, the blind see, the deaf hear,
the lame walk, the dead live. What like this is there in Mr. Owen’s
ghostly or ghastly narratives of trances, thundering noises, and
haunted houses? Every one of his narratives shows, so far as it shows
anything not explicable by simple psychical states and powers, the
marks which the church has always regarded as signs of the presence of
the devil. Some of the cases he describes are clearly cases of
possession, and others are as clearly cases of obsession. Unhappily,
Mr. Owen, who formerly believed in no God, now takes, knowingly or
not, the devil to be God.
Mr. Owen has hardly improved on the heathen Celsus, who was refuted by
Origen. Celsus charged the miracles of our Lord to magic. Mr. Owen
ascribes them to necromancy, and regards the apostles and saints each
as a person with a familiar spirit, or, in the language of the
spiritists, a medium. The Jews also ascribed the miracles of our Lord
to the agency of the devil, and charged that it was by Beelzebub, the
prince of devils, that he did his wonderful works. But there is a
striking difference between the Jews and Celsus and our late minister
to Naples. They sought to prove the satanic origin of the miracles of
our Lord as a reason for rejecting him and his teaching; he attempts
to do it as a reason for believing him and reverencing his doctrine
and character. But they lived in an age of darkness, superstition, and
semi-barbarism, and he in an age of light, reason, and civilization,
and the distance between him and them is the measure of the progress
the world has made since their time--a mighty progress indeed, but a
progress backward. The Bible tells us all the gods of the heathen were
devils, and Mr. Owen agrees and takes the devil for God, and demon
worship as true divine worship. What the Jews and Celsus falsely
alleged against our Lord as an objection, he reasserts as a
recommendation. He has discovered that evil is good.
The class of facts which the spiritists call spirit-manifestations are
recognized in the Bible from beginning to end, but always as the works
of the devil or evil spirits, always as works to be condemned and to
be avoided; and any communication with those who do them is forbidden.
Necromancers, or those who consult the spirits of the dead, are
mentioned and condemned in the Book of Genesis. The Mosaic law
ordained that a witch or a woman with a familiar spirit--that is, a
medium, whether a rapping or a clear-seeing, a talking or a writing
medium--should not be suffered to live. The church has always
condemned everything of the sort, and requires a candidate for baptism
to renounce the devil and his works, and expels the devil from him by
her exorcisms, before receiving the postulant to her communion. And
yet Mr. Owen would have us believe that the Bible and the church
sanction his doctrine, that the Christian miracles and the
spirit-manifestations are produced by one and the same agency! Verily,
Mr. Owen throws a strong light on the origin of the great Gentile
apostasy, and shows us how easily men who break from the unity of 810
divine tradition, and set up for themselves, can lose sight of God,
and come step by step to worship the devil in his place. The thing
seemed incredible, and we had some difficulty in taking the assertion
of the Holy Scriptures literally, “All the gods of the gentiles are
devils”; but since we see apostasy from the church running the same
career, and actually inaugurating the worship of demons, actually
exalting the devil above our Lord, the Mystery of Iniquity is
explained, and the matter becomes plain and credible.
It is curious to see what has been the course of thought in the
Protestant apostasy in regard to the class of facts in question.
Having lost the power of exorcism with their loss of the true faith,
the Protestant nations had no resource against the invasions of the
spirits but to carry out the injunction of the Mosaic law, “Thou shalt
not suffer a witch”--that is, a medium--“to live.” Hence we find their
annals in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries blackened with
accounts of the trials and cruel punishments of persons suspected of
witchcraft, sorcery, or dealings with the devil, especially in
England, Scotland, and the Anglo-American colonies. Having no
well-defined and certain criteria, as the church has, by which to
determine the presence of Satan, many persons, no doubt, were put to
death who were innocent of the offences of which they were accused.
This produced a reaction in the public mind against the laws and
against the execution of persons for witchcraft or dealing with the
devil. This reaction was followed by a denial of witchcraft, or that
the devil had anything to do with matters and things on earth, and a
shower of ridicule fell on all who believed in anything of the sort.
Then came the general doubt, and then the denial of the existence of
the devil and all infernal spirits, save in human nature itself.
Finally came the spirit-manifestations, in which Satan is no longer
regarded as Satan, but is held to be divine, and worshipped as God, by
thousands and millions.
We must be excused from entering into any elaborate refutation of Mr.
Owen’s blasphemous attempt to bring the Christian miracles under the
general law, as he regards it, of spirit-manifestations. He has proved
the reality of no such law, and if he had, the spirit-manifestations
themselves would prove nothing more than a gale of wind, a shower of
rain, a flash of lightning, or the growth of a spire of grass. Could
we prove the Christian miracles to be facts in the order of nature, or
show them as taking place by a general law, and not by the immediate
act of God, and therefore no miracles at all, we should deprive them
of all their importance. The value of the facts is not in their being
facts, but in their being miraculous facts, which none but God can
work. The author does not understand this, but supposes that he has
won a victory for Christianity when he has proved the miracles as
facts, but at the same time that they are no miracles.
It is clear from his pages that the author does not know what
Christians understand by a miracle. He cites St. Augustine to prove
that a miracle is something that may take place by some law of nature
to us unknown, but St. Augustine, in the passage he cites, is not
speaking of miracles at all; he is speaking of portents, prodigies, or
extraordinary events, which the ignorant, and the superstitious
ascribe to a supernatural agency; but which may, after all, however
wonderful, be produced by a natural cause, as in our days not a few 811
believe to be the case with the spirit-manifestations themselves, and
no doubt is the case with most of the wonders the spiritists relate.
The devil may work portents or prodigies, but not miracles, because he
has no creative power, and can work only with materials created to his
hand.
It is necessary also to distinguish between what is simply superhuman
and what is supernatural. Whatever is creature is in the order of
nature. Nature embraces the entire creation--whatever exists that is
not God or distinguishable from him. Whether the created powers are
above man or below him in the scale of existence, they are equally
natural, and so is whatever they are capable, as second causes, of
doing. The angels in heaven, the very highest as the lowest, are God’s
creatures, distinguishable from him, and therefore included in nature.
The same must be said of the devils in hell, or the ghosts, if the
spirits of the departed, and hence whatever they do is within the
natural order. The devil is superior, if you will, by nature to
man--for man is made little lower than the angels, and the devil is an
angel fallen; he may know many things beyond human intelligence, and
do many things beyond the power of man; but what the devil does, is,
if superhuman, not in any sense supernatural, but as natural as what
man himself does. We agree with Mr. Owen, though not for the same
reason, that there is nothing miraculous in the spirit-manifestations,
even supposing them to be facts, and therefore are of no value in
relation to the truth or falsehood of Christianity as a revelation of
and by the supernatural.
God alone, and what he does immediately by his direct act and
immediate act, is supernatural. God alone can work a miracle, which is
a supernatural effect wrought without any natural medium, law, or
agency, in or on nature, and is, as far as it goes, a manifestation of
creative power.
Miracles do what portents, prodigies, spirit-rappings, etc., do
not--they manifest the supernatural, or the existence of a real order
above nature. They do not indeed directly prove the truth of the
Christian mysteries, but they do accredit our Lord as a teacher sent
from God. As Nicodemus said when he came by night to Jesus, “Rabbi, we
know that thou art come a teacher from God, for no man can do the
miracles thou doest, unless God were with him,” God in the miracles
accredits the teacher, and vouches for the truth of what he in whose
favor they are wrought teaches. What our Lord teaches, then, is true.
If he teaches that he is perfect God and perfect man in hypostatic
union, then he is so, and then is to be believed, on his own word,
whatever he teaches, for “it is impossible for God to lie.” The
facts, then, are of no importance if not miracles. Hence the
“natural-supernaturalism” of the _Sartor Resartus_ is not only a
contradiction in terms, but utterly worthless, as are most of the
admired utterances of its author, and aid us not in solving a single
problem for which revelation is needed.
Deprive us of the prophecies under the Old Law and the miracles under
the New, and we should be deprived of all means of proving
Christianity as a supernatural religion, as supernaturally inspired
and revealed, and should be reduced, as Mr. Owen is, to naked
rationalism, or downright demonism. The prodigies of the devil do not
carry us above nature. They are indeed Satan’s efforts to counterfeit
genuine miracles, but at best they only give us the superhuman for the 812
supernatural. If the author could prove the Christian miracles are not
miracles, though credible as facts, or if he could bring them into the
category of the spirit-manifestations, he would in effect divest
Christianity of its supernatural character, and render it all as
worthless as any man-constructed system of ethics or philosophy. His
Christianity, as set forth in his pages, has not a trace of the
Christianity of Christ, and is as little worthy of being called
Christian as the bald Unitarianism of Channing, or the Deism of
Rousseau, Tom Paine, or Voltaire, or the Free Religion of Emerson,
Higginson, and Julia Ward Howe.
What Mr. Owen regards as a highly important fact, and which he
urges Protestants to accept as the means of triumphing over the
Catholic Church, namely, that the Christian miracles and the
spirit-manifestations are worthy of precisely the same respect and
confidence in a Christian point of view, is far less important than he
in his profound ignorance of Christianity imagines. How far he will be
successful with Protestants we know not; but his success, we imagine,
will be greatest among people of his own class, who, having no settled
belief in any religion, who know little of the principles of
Christianity, are, as all such people are, exceedingly credulous and
superstitious. These people hover on the borders of Protestantism,
have certain sympathies with the Reformation, but it would be hardly
just to call them in the ordinary sense of the term Protestants. Yet
Protestantism, being substantially a revival in principle of the
ancient Gentile apostasy which led to the worship of the devil in the
place of God before our Lord’s advent, there can be no doubt that
Protestants are peculiarly exposed to Satanic invasions, and there is
no certainty that they may not follow Mr. Owen back to the
devil-worship from which Christianity rescued the nations that
embraced it. But we have said enough for the present. Perhaps we may
say more hereafter.
[159] 1. _The Debatable Land between this World and the
Next._ With Illustrative Narratives. By Robert Dale Owen.
New York: Carleton & Co. 1872. 16mo, pp. 542.
2. _Footfalls on the Boundary of Another World._ With
Narrative Illustrations. By Robert Dale Owen. Philadelphia:
Lippincott & Co. 1860. 16mo, pp. 528.
----------
THE ANNUNCIATION.
MARCH 27TH.
She kneels in prayer--a childlike, virgin form;
What purity is mirrored in her eyes!
Her dove-like glances, with devotion warm,
Are raised in worship, to the midnight skies--
But look! a heavenly radiance bright has shone
Around the virgin chosen of the Lord;
In her rapt prayer she hears the angel’s tone,
“Hail! full of grace! for lo! upon the word
Of thy consent waits now the heavenly dove,
Whose wings o’ershadowing thee shall lightly rest
One moment on thy pure and humble breast,
And make thee by that awful seal of love
The mother of thy God!” She bows her head,
While _fiat mihi_ in meek tones is said.
----------
FLEURANGE. 813
BY MRS. CRAVEN, AUTHOR OF “A SISTER’s STORY.”
TRANSLATED FROM THE FRENCH, WITH PERMISSION.
PART FIRST.
THE OLD MANSION.
IV.
When daylight appeared, Fleurange awoke first, but in a few minutes,
while she was admiring the child still sleeping in her arms, his large
eyes opened in their turn. Their first expression was one of extreme
surprise, somewhat mingled with fear, but Fleurange’s look and voice
soon had a reassuring effect. His eyes grew smiling, his mouth half
opened, his little arms stretched towards her and were soon clasped
around her neck, and the acquaintance was made. During this time the
pale and languid young mother was endeavoring to shake off a heaviness
more difficult to overcome than sleep. She slightly blushed and
murmured some words of excuse when she perceived her child in the arms
of the beautiful stranger. But Fleurange protested with an accent of
indubitable truth that the child did not trouble her in the least. She
soon perceived she could be of some service to the poor convalescent.
The children, aroused from a long night’s sleep, were now wholly
awake. Every one knows that children awake, and, confined within a
narrow space, soon arrive at a degree of turbulence whose only
advantage is to produce lassitude and then sleep. During the first of
these two phases, the poor mother made a vain and feeble effort to
restrain them. After a few minutes she fell back, not only exhausted,
but faint. Fleurange drew near, and began to improvise a pillow for
her head out of the shawls scattered around. Then she opened the small
basket Mademoiselle Josephine had given her, and took out a flask, the
contents of which, poured on a handkerchief and applied to the sick
woman’s pale face and temples, soon revived her.
“Thank you,” she said; “you have done me a great deal of good. I am
feeble, that is all, but I did not suppose myself so much so.”
“Do not exert yourself,” replied Fleurange. “I will take care of the
children.”
The mother smiled, and touched her head, showing by this gesture how
fatiguing she found the noise she had not succeeded in quieting. At
that very moment, the younger of the two children was standing on the
seat, trying to reach the net, of painful memory, suspended like the
sword of Damocles over the travellers’ heads, and which served as a
receptacle for everything that could not be stowed away elsewhere. 814
The child was not climbing without a motive. His brother had already
successfully preceded him, and found means of seizing, through the
meshes of the net, a small hunting-horn, on which he was now executing
a flourish. Why could not he also get his drum, almost within reach?
If he could only stretch a little farther--and he looked at Fleurange
with a supplicating air; but the latter, instead of heeding his mute
appeal, laughingly laid hold of him and drew him on her lap; then
skilfully bearing off the hunting-horn from the other, she promised to
relate them the most charming of stories if they would be quiet. In an
instant they were both leaning beside her, and then, in a low tone,
she related one story after another, keeping them silent and attentive
till the hour of sleep returned.
By the end of the second day the travellers had made great progress in
their acquaintance. “How can I thank you sufficiently?” said the young
mother. “How fortunate I was to meet you!”
“Do not thank me: your children have done me more good than I can
return.”
This reply, of course, did not at all diminish the gratitude mingled
with admiration with which she had inspired her companion, and as
there is only a step from attraction to confidence, the latter soon
related the whole story of her uneventful life to Fleurange. She had
met with a severe fall three months before, and her life was despaired
of; then her husband took her to Paris to consult Dr. Leblanc, who
effected a cure. Fleurange’s eyes brightened. It was such a
gratification to be able to talk about her dear old friends!
“He is so skilful and kind,” she said.
“Oh! yes, indeed! he is more than a physician: he is a benefactor, and
yet I disobeyed him in starting so soon! He said I was still too
feeble, which I denied; but I see he was right.”
“Why did you do so?”
“Because my poor Wilhelm is alone and impatiently awaiting me.”
“Your husband?”
“Yes.”
“Could he not have come for you?”
“No; he is M. Dornthal’s head clerk, and it is very difficult for him
to leave his post.”
Fleurange’s heart gave a leap at this name. “Are you alluding to M.
Ludwig Dornthal?” said she.
“No; to his brother, the rich banker.”
“And the other--the professor--do you know him?”
“I have never seen him, but Wilhelm is well acquainted with him, and
is sometimes invited to the soirées he gives. They are not balls--they
are not fond of dancing there--but réunions for conversation, reading,
music, and looking at engravings. Wilhelm says they are all learned,
the girls as well as the boys, and madame as much so as her husband.”
Fleurange slightly shuddered at this brief communication respecting
her uncle’s family. She was very fond of study, still more so of the
arts; she had a taste for reading she was often obliged to repress,
but this word “learned” she did not find attractive.
“Learned!” she said to herself. “That means pedantic, grave, and
tiresome. Well, I must make the best of it. Perhaps that does not
prevent them from being good, which is the essential point, and I
certainly should not aim at amusement in this short life.”
Another night--another long day now drawing to a close--when lights 815
more frequent and bright, and more numerous dwellings, announced the
vicinity of a large city. As each moment brought them nearer their
destination, the joy of the mother and her children became more
expansive.
“He will be waiting for us, will he not?” said the elder of the
children.
“Yes, yes, we shall see him as soon as the carriage stops, but that
will not be for an hour.” Soon the cry was: “In half an hour, now!”
and at last: “Here we are!”
Poor Fleurange listened to her travelling companions, and envied them
the certainty of being greeted at their journey’s end by a dear and
well-known face. Sadness and a fearful timidity came over her. At
last, the carriage stopped. As at their departure, there was a great
uproar, a variety of cries, and vacillating lights, which illuminated
everything, but nothing distinctly. Fleurange sought in vain among all
the persons who crowded around the carriage, for a face that might be
her uncle’s. The door opened. A tall man with flowing hair and a long
blonde beard presented himself. “Was it he?” No, the joyful cries of
the children at once informed Fleurange it was their father.
“Bertha, Bertha!” he exclaimed, and, even before embracing his
children, he pressed both her hands and looked anxiously in her face.
“You are very pale, dear Bertha.”
“It is only with joy, Wilhelm,” replied she, weeping. “I am cured, and
I behold you once more!”
He then stretched out his arms to his children, but before leaving the
carriage they both cried “Adieu! adieu!” in childlike tones and threw
their arms around Fleurange’s neck.
“Wilhelm,” said his wife in a low tone, “thank this kind young lady,
who has been an angel of goodness to them and to me on the way.”
He turned with a soft and grateful look toward Fleurange: “May God
reward you, fair and gentle maiden,” said he, taking off his hat. Then
he added hesitatingly:
“Doubtless some one is waiting for you here, and I cannot have the
pleasure of rendering you any service?”
“I thank you,” said Fleurange quickly. “I am, indeed, expected by my
relatives.” While speaking she anxiously cast her eyes around. No one
seemed to be seeking her in the crowd of unknown faces that surrounded
her. Was there any mistake? Had they forgotten her? What should she
do?
Meanwhile her travelling companions left the carriage, and the happy
group was already at a distance. She followed them with her eyes, her
heart sinking within her. At that instant a small open carriage, drawn
by a fine horse, drove swiftly up. In it was a youth of eighteen or
nineteen years. He threw the reins to some one standing near and
sprang out. Seeing him, Bertha’s husband took off his hat, and a cap
is hastily raised in return, displaying an abundance of light hair of
rather a warm shade. But the new-comer did not stop. He was in a great
hurry and out of breath. He ran up to the diligence and said
inquiringly:
“Mademoiselle Gabrielle!”
“That is my name,” said Fleurange, at first struck dumb at hearing
herself so-called, and especially at the sight of him who had come to
meet her.
“Very well,” said he, “let me help you descend.”
Fleurange silently prepared to obey, but after another glance at him
as he held out a firm hand, she said: “There is no mistake, is there?
It is my uncle, M. Ludwig Dornthal, who has sent for me?”
The only reply she received was an affirmative nod of the head; a 816
moment after, a concise order, promptly obeyed, brought down from the
heights of the imperial the modest luggage belonging to Fleurange. In
an instant it was fastened behind the light carriage which he
afterward assisted her in entering, then, carefully and silently
wrapping around her a large fur cloak which he had brought, he took
his seat, and the horse set off, as he came, at a fast trot.
Fleurange at first felt giddy with the rapid motion of the carriage,
but it soon became agreeable, contrasted with the heavy movements and
violent jolting of the diligence. The weather was sharp, but the warm
cloak that covered her prevented her from feeling it, and, thus
protected, the keen air, so far from being unpleasant, gave her, on
the contrary, an unaccustomed animation which was like a fresh
infusion of youth and life. The sky above was sparkling with stars. It
was one of those brilliant winter nights which we love to imagine like
that which witnessed the coming of Christ, and saw angels hovering
over the heights that surround Bethlehem, to convey the glad tidings
to the shepherds, and sing on earth their divine hymn.
In about twenty minutes the horse slackened his pace a little, and the
young coachman turned around and seemed to make some attempt at an
explanation which Fleurange tried her best to comprehend, but the
rattling over the pavements rendered this nearly impossible, and she
only seized the words “My father” and “_Christ Kindchen!_” after which
his head, turned around for an instant, resumed its former position,
and the horse his usual pace.
But Fleurange gathered from this that the youth was one of M.
Dornthal’s sons, and her uncle had not been able to meet her for some
reason connected with the festival of the following day. Her first
impression was that her cousin’s manners were rather abrupt, and his
face somewhat peculiar, but on the whole he had shown himself very
efficient and attentive. As for his skill in driving it was
unrivalled, the reins could not have been in better hands.
After this short interruption, they kept on their way without
slackening an instant, notwithstanding more than one turn through the
winding streets, and at length arrived at a place planted with trees,
where the carriage stopped before a flight of steps leading to an
oaken door adorned with a massive brass knocker.
Some one was evidently watching for them, for the door instantly flew
open. Fleurange caught the glimpse of a bright light and many forms!
Her cousin hastened to aid her in alighting. Confused voices were
audible, all having a cordial accent of welcome. A strong hand
supported Fleurange as she ascended the six stone steps and entered
the passage. A tall woman dressed in gray, and wearing a cap trimmed
with flowers, approached and embraced her. “It is my turn now!” said a
deep and sonorous voice, “for I am her uncle.” Fleurange raised her
eyes toward a noble countenance which had too young a look to be
crowned with such white hair, and her uncle embraced her, murmuring in
a softened tone the name of Margaret. Beside him stood a lovely young
girl, grave and blonde, while another, fair as her sister but younger,
divested Fleurange of the heavy fur cloak and untied her bonnet. A boy
of seven years ran out into the street to aid his brother, and a
little girl of four or five clung to her mother’s skirts, looking
curiously, but with delight, at the strange visitor.
Fleurange, dazzled by the lights, and confused by the very cordiality 817
of her reception, was incapable of uttering a word, but her large
eyes, full of tears, were more expressive than any words, and the
unusual brilliancy of her complexion, owing to the keen night air, and
her long tresses falling over her shoulders when her bonnet was
removed, gave her an unusually striking appearance which would have
conciliated the most malevolent. How, then, must she have been
regarded by those so ready to welcome her heartily?
They led her, triumphantly, as it were, into a spacious drawing-room
which was still more dazzling. In the centre of the apartment stood a
tree brilliantly illuminated and hung with toys, flowers, jewels, and
fruit of all kinds. Two chandeliers added their light to that of the
illuminated tree, under one of which half a dozen children were
gathered around a table loaded with cakes. Several young ladies, as
well as others who were older, were grouped here and there.
In short, Fleurange suddenly found herself, and for the first time in
her life, in the midst of what seemed to her a very brilliant reunion,
in which all the faces, even those of her hosts, were strange. The
least timid would have been disconcerted, and Fleurange was completely
abashed. The lady in gray with a cap trimmed with flowers, whom she
supposed to be her aunt, took her by the hand, and hastily led her
back into the passage, and thence into a small parlor lighted by a
single lamp. In crossing the hall, they met Fleurange’s young guide.
“Is she ill? Does she need anything?” he asked in a kind and eager
tone.
“Yes, she needs rest,” and with this reply Madame Dornthal shut the
door in her son’s face.
Fleurange sat down and breathed more freely. Hitherto she had been
unable not only to utter a word, but even to collect her thoughts.
Now, thanks to the quiet room, she at once grew calm, and in a few
minutes felt quite recovered. She was young and vigorous. She had
scarcely felt the fatigue of the journey, and it was not in her nature
to yield long to emotion and embarrassment, especially when in the
depths of her heart she felt so happy! Had not a single glance, quick
as a flash, sufficed to dissipate the burden which weighed on her
heart, and to light it up with a transport of joy and hope? Her
uncle’s voice, the words he murmured as he embraced her, “O Margaret,
is it you?” gave her a thrill; then the soft glances of those fair
young girls, the sight of the children gathered under the
Christmas-tree, even the abrupt attentions of her young cousin--all
gave her a delicious sensation of safety, an assurance of protection
which in her moments of desolation she had desired more than joy or
happiness.
She raised her head, and looked at her aunt, who stood silently
regarding her. The latter was decidedly ugly--astonishingly so, yet
even before she spoke or smiled there was an expression more desirable
than beauty visibly imprinted on her face, otherwise devoid of all
charm--an expression of intelligence and kindness.
“Remain here perfectly quiet, will you?” said Madame Dornthal,
_tutoyant_ Fleurange as if she had known her from childhood.[160]
“There, look at the clock; a quarter of an hour will be sufficient. Do
not try to talk, only listen to me. You are at home, you must 818
understand: remember that. No thanks are necessary. You are one of our
children. We had five: now we have six. It was Clement, my oldest son,
who went to meet you, because his father could not leave the children
this evening. You saw Hilda and Clara at your arrival, as well as the
two little ones, Fritz and Frida, who were also there to receive you.
There is Gabrielle besides: that is all. Your uncle has mourned so
much for his poor sister Margaret! Now he has found her again, it is a
happy day for us all!”
Fleurange quietly wiped away her tears without replying. Just then
some one knocked at the door.
“Who is there?”
“It is I.”
It was Clement with a cup of coffee, which, at her aunt’s injunction,
Fleurange drank with docility.
“Will you now go up to your room for the night, or will you return to
the drawing-room among the others?”
Fleurange replied without any hesitation: “I prefer to go back to the
drawing-room and see them all, at once.”
A pleasant smile lighted up Madame Dornthal’s face. “I like you very
much, Gabrielle, not because you are handsome, that has nothing to do
with it; I should love you quite as much were it otherwise; but
because there is so much simplicity about you--which is quite to my
taste. Now, let me see: it is eleven o’clock, our friends are going to
take their children home, and our youngest are going to bed. As to the
rest of us, we shall presently go to the Midnight Mass, and not sup
till our return. Make your own choice--to follow the children’s
example, or go with us.”
“Oh! with you, with you!” cried Fleurange. “Pray, take me to church;
I am neither feeble nor fatigued.”
“And yet you are fatigued,” replied Madame Dornthal, “only you do not
yet feel it. But as it will do you no harm, you shall do as you wish.
So save your strength, and do not return now to the drawing-room. You
can remain here and wait for me.”
She left the room, and Fleurange remained where she was, happy to obey
such kind orders without any resistance. Five minutes after, the door
opened. It was Clement again, holding his little brother by the hand,
and carrying his young sister in his arms.
“Fritz and Frida wish to bid you good-night,” he said. The little boy
timidly approached. Fleurange immediately spoke to him in that
language which all children understand, and which can only be learned
and spoken by those who love them: he was speedily reassured. She then
took Frida, and kissed her blue eyes, which, while looking at her with
surprise, began to close. When she gave the child back to her brother,
she was asleep, and he bore her away without awakening her, holding
her with an ease that showed how accustomed he was to the care. His
little brother followed him out of the room.
Half an hour of silent repose succeeded this interruption. It was more
beneficial to Fleurange than sleep, which strong excitement kept her
from feeling the need of. At the end of that time, Madame Dornthal
reappeared with her two daughters. Clement and his father were waiting
for them in the passage. They set off by starlight on foot, for the
church was near. They were all silent and thoughtful, for the
children’s festival had not made them forgetful of the solemnity of
this great night.
In church, once more in church, Fleurange felt, as she knelt down, 819
that her overburdened heart could now find relief, and when solemn,
harmonious, and accordant voices made the magnificent arches resound
with unearthly chants, which seemed to be the spontaneous expression
of universal prayer, the young girl bowed her head still lower: all
the joy and gratitude of her heart overflowed in sweet tears and
fervent prayers of thanksgiving. When Mass was over, one voice, which
surpassed the rest--a voice sweet and manly--intoned beside her the
Psalm _Laudate Dominum_. She involuntarily joined in the strain, and
the two voices seemed for an instant to form but one.
When she turned around, she saw that this singer was her cousin,
Clement Dornthal.
V.
When a friendly hand aids a shipwrecked traveller in reaching the
shore, his first impulse is to express his boundless gratitude. Rest
is sweet, even on the sand, to him who has just escaped the perils of
the ocean; but if he finds no place of refuge on the shore, if his
only hope of an asylum is the vague glimmer of some distant beacon, he
is tempted to doubt his strength to reach the half-seen light, and if
it will really prove a haven. Such had been the mixture of gratitude
and apprehension the poor orphan felt the day she accepted from
Mademoiselle Josephine the hospitality of the blue chamber, and it did
not leave her the whole time of her stay in that first harbor of
safety. But to-day, roused from her slumbers by the merry Christmas
chimes, her first thought was: “Thank God, I have arrived at port”;
and she rose from her spacious couch eager to begin her new life. She
began the day by writing to Mademoiselle Josephine. Her old friend
must be informed of her happiness before she could enter upon its
enjoyment. It seemed only a debt of gratitude to share with her all
her new and pleasing impressions. She also wrote to Madre Maddalena:
she must without any delay link all the friends and joys of the past
with her present happiness and truly transformed life.
Her aunt, in assuring her the previous evening she was among her
own--that is, at home--seemed to have constituted her, as by magic, a
child of the house. Everything around her was new and somewhat
strange, but everything pleased her as if naturally conformed to her
tastes; and yet the walls of her room, hung with sombre colors, the
old press of carved wood, which easily contained her limited wardrobe,
the high-backed chairs ranged around, the antique bureau in one
corner, and in the other a great monumental stove, the spectral aspect
of which alone was surprising--all this might easily have offended an
eye accustomed to the smiling magnificence of Italy, but not an object
in the house seemed capable of imparting any sad impressions. The word
welcome appeared inscribed on every side, as on all faces, and in this
sweet atmosphere she instinctively felt that the material comfort was
only a type of the mental freedom much more necessary than the other
to the happiness of life.
“You must not dress in black today, Gabrielle,” said her two fair
cousins, as they entered her chamber for the third time since she rose
an hour before, bearing a basket which contained garments similar to 820
their own.
“Why not?” said Fleurange, somewhat astonished.
“Do you not know that, in Germany, mourning is laid aside on great
festivals?” replied Clara, the younger of the two. “You must dress
like us to-day, as you will always do when the time for this sad
mourning is over.”
The elder of the two sisters noticed that her cousin made no reply:
she approached her and said affectionately:
“Excuse Clara if she has distressed you. She is so gay and happy
herself, that she cannot comprehend misfortune and sadness.”
“I do not wish to remind her of them to-day,” said Fleurange, “and
will do as she requests. But you, dear Hilda,” continued she--looking
with admiration at her cousin’s golden locks and grave brow, which a
queen’s diadem would have suited, or the aureola of a saint--“are you
not as gay and happy as your sister?”
“Yes, as happy,” said Hilda, “but not as gay.”
After some explanations, Fleurange conformed to her cousins’ wishes.
But when, before dinner, the beautiful Hilda, clothed in white,
brought a garland like that she wore herself and wished to place it on
her head, she objected: “As to this garland, Hilda, you must excuse me
from wearing it.”
“Why so?”
“Because I have never worn any ornament of the kind: because, after
all, I cannot and do not wish to forget I am a poor orphan, who should
not dream of adorning herself, or mingling in the world.”
“But, Gabrielle, you must know we only adorn ourselves to celebrate at home
the great annual festivals, and we never mingle in the world.”
“Never? But then, why wear flowers without any reason?”
“It is not without a reason. My father likes us to wear the flowers of
the season at every feast. This poor wreath you have refused,
Gabrielle, look at it: it is, like mine, of holly, reflecting the
brightness of Christmas, with its shining leaves and berries red as
coral. There, see if it is not becoming in your raven hair?” As she
spoke, Hilda held the wreath over her cousin’s head: at that instant
Clara appeared, and hesitation was no longer possible. She instantly
took her sister’s place: the bright leaves and red berries were placed
like a crown on Fleurange’s brow, who laughed and only made a feeble
resistance, while the mirror reflected the forms of the three young
girls--as graceful a picture as ever haunted an artist’s dreams.
“There,” cried Clara, “you are both beautiful--one fair as the day and
the other brilliant as night. And I,” continued she, arranging her
long curls, among which holly leaves were also twined--“let me see
what I resemble myself.”
“A flower, a star, dear Clara: everything that is best worth gazing at
by day or night,” said Fleurange affectionately.
She preferred the elder of the two sisters, but there was an
irresistible grace about the other, whom she could not help caressing
with her eyes and tones, as if she were a child.
“Ah! that is charming, poetic, and very applicable! Thank you, Cousin
Gabrielle. I will presently ask our poet to divine my emblems. We
shall see if he agrees with you.”
“If our poet is in a fit of abstraction, you must ask some one else
who certainly will not be,” said Hilda.
Clara blushed. “Come, come!” said she, “let us talk no longer about 821
me, but go down. There is Frida coming for us. They have doubtless all
arrived.” And taking her little sister by the hand, she ran off,
scarcely touching the massive balustrade as she flew down the stairs.
“You did not tell me you were expecting visitors,” said Fleurange.
“Only some friends and relatives. Since my Uncle Heinrich lost his
wife, he and his son have taken their Christmas dinner with us. The
family formerly assembled at his house. You are going to make his
acquaintance, and that of our fine cousin Felix. The rest are our
friends, and will soon be yours.” Hilda paused. “You doubtless know
that Hansfelt is my father’s friend, and was the companion of his
youth?” she continued at length.
“Hansfelt!” exclaimed Fleurange. “What! Karl Hansfelt, the great
poet?”
We have already remarked that Fleurange perfectly understood her
mother’s native tongue. The poems of the person just mentioned were
sufficiently celebrated at that time for her to be familiar with them,
and even know some of them by heart.
“And he is your friend? And shall I see him?”
“Yes,” replied Hilda, “you will see him often. And you will also see,”
she added, as if eager to change the subject, “a young artist who is
beginnings be quite popular. His name is Julian Steinberg, and he is a
friend of Overbeck’s. I will leave Clara to introduce him to you.” A
significant smile accompanied the last words, and Fleurange,
comprehending, or nearly so, the state of affairs, descended with her
cousin into the large drawing-room, which, as well as the dining-room,
was on the ground floor.
The house M. Ludwig Dornthal inhabited is probably no longer standing.
Modern improvements have swept away, one by one, those old houses in
all our cities to which time had given an aspect too much at variance
with the tastes and requirements of a new generation. Even at the
period in which our story opens--that is, in 1824--the house of which
we are speaking already began to be pointed out as the _Old
Mansion_--the name, _par excellence_, by which it was known in the
city. But, as it was spacious and commodious, its situation quiet and
retired, and it had a large garden which all the windows on one side
overlooked, it was admirably adapted to the professor’s studious
habits. The picturesque color it had acquired with age was also quite
to his taste, and, above all, as it was here Ludwig Dornthal passed
the first years of his married life, and where his children were born,
nothing in the world would have induced him to leave it, and on this
point they were all agreed. The Old Mansion was dear to those who
inhabited it, as well as to all who frequented it, and every one, like
Fleurange, uttered more or less fervently these words, which are
always vainly repeated in this world when our faculties are all for an
instant in a state of happy equilibrium: “It is good for us to be
here: let us set up our tabernacle, and here remain.” This impression,
it may be supposed, was not wholly owing to the exterior aspect of the
Old Mansion. There was a harmony between it and its occupants; and,
with various results, this effect is produced almost everywhere.
Inanimate objects seem to imbibe and communicate something of the life
that passes around them, and this language, though silent, is, to
those who heed it, a source of genuine revelation.
When Fleurange entered the drawing-room, she perceived her Uncle 822
Ludwig was rather impatiently awaiting her, for the moment she
appeared he advanced, and, taking her by the hand, led her to the
other end of the apartment, where stood a gentleman whose features
bore some resemblance to his own; but with so different an expression,
that the likeness, which at first was apparent, grew less and less as
the two brothers were better known.
“This is our sister Margaret’s daughter,” said Ludwig to the banker.
“She is doubly your niece now, for I have adopted her as my child.”
M. Heinrich Dornthal bowed and cordially embraced the young girl, but
he could not resist saying: “Another daughter, when you have three
already, is a great addition.”
This cool and unpleasant remark disconcerted Fleurange, and she had
not recovered from her painful sensation of embarrassment when a young
man of rather a fine figure approached and offered her his arm.
Fleurange looked at him with an air of astonishment. She had never
been to a large dinner-party, and knew nothing of the usages common to
all countries on such an occasion. She slightly retreated, and,
opening her large eyes, said: “Who are you, monsieur, and where do you
wish to conduct me?”
This question and movement caused a general smile around her, in which
she saw her Uncle Ludwig join, and with that simplicity which was her
greatest charm she began to laugh herself, and so innocently, that he
who had involuntarily caused this little scene exclaimed half aloud:
“This is truly the most charming piece of rusticity I ever met with;”
and then, bowing to her with mock gravity, and an air at once gallant
and bantering, he said:
“Mademoiselle, my name is Felix Dornthal: I have the honor of being
your cousin, and I offer you my arm to conduct you to the dining-room;
but I acknowledge there would have been more propriety in first making
us acquainted with each other.”
Fleurange, blushing and smiling, accepted the arm offered her, and,
once seated at table beside this new cousin, and freed from the
embarrassment of this little incident, she looked around and began to
enjoy her novel position.
Was it really her own self, who recently felt so isolated? She who had
stood face to face with want and abandonment? Could she be the same
person now, surrounded by numerous relatives, a member of a large
family, feeling herself beloved by all, and loving all in return--yes,
all, excepting the cousin seated beside her, who caused her
involuntary confusion; and yet he had just said some words to her in
Italian, pronounced with so pure an accent that she experienced a
lively sensation of surprise and joy, for Italy was her native
land--her own country almost, left only a few months previous for the
first time. But her cousin’s words embodied a compliment to which she
did not know how to reply, and when she raised her eyes toward him she
met a look that disconcerted her still more. She therefore only
uttered a few words in return, and then silently resumed her
examination of the company, beginning with her Uncle Ludwig. As to
him, she thought she had never seen a nobler and sweeter face. It was
impossible not to be struck by the contrast in this respect between
him and his wife, which must have been even more striking in their
youth than now. While she was dwelling on this thought, she met her
aunt’s eye resting on her for a moment, and saw her smile. That look 823
and smile seemed to answer her, and give a clue to the mystery, for
they revealed the traits that constitute the indestructible bond of
genuine sympathy. Beauty adds nothing to such characteristics, or at
least only a charm the heart disregards, and which even the eye soon
ceases to dwell on, for they who are capable of loving a soul soon
love the form, whatever it may be, in which it is clothed.
The only one of the children who had not inherited the beauty of the
Dornthals was Clement, who looked more like his mother than the rest.
He had the same ugliness and the same smile, and yet, as he was tall,
slender, active, and robust, his form, without being elegant, was not
devoid of grace, and when his thick hair was thrown back, the shape of
his forehead gave a marked character to his face, and his look was, in
flashes, expressive, decided, and intelligent. It was astonishing,
therefore, to find young Dornthal so apparently incapable of
self-assertion: the more so because he possessed great aptitude for
the arts and sciences, and as a student he stood in the highest rank.
But it seemed to be an effort for him to converse, and he was so
absolutely silent in the drawing-room that his friends habitually
avoided speaking to him. Elsewhere it was different. His father found
it difficult to conceal the secret preference he felt for his eldest
son, and the affectionate pride with which he regarded him was
manifest in his looks on all occasions, in spite of himself. And
Clement’s mother showed a confidence in him almost strange,
considering his youth, and often seemed more disposed to consult than
direct him. As to his brothers and sisters, they idolized him and were
constantly recurring to him; he had a remedy for every difficulty, a
means for every end, and nothing exhausted his patience. In spite of
this, as we have said, he scarcely attracted any attention in company.
We can therefore understand why Fleurange, in continuing her
inspection, did not stop long to consider her cousin, but, on the
contrary, directed all her attention to a person at his side whose
face was singularly remarkable. He was a man about fifty years old,
perhaps older, for his bald head, gray beard, and pale face, marked by
sickness, showed he was no longer young. But a something indefinable
attracted attention, and induced people to inquire his name, and the
name seemed so much in harmony with his countenance that, when known,
it was not unusual to hear the exclamation: “So had I pictured him to
myself.” Such, in fact, was that of Fleurange when, in reply to her
question, her cousin Felix told her his name was Hansfelt.
“Karl Hansfelt!” she repeated for the second time; “is it he?--what!
is that he?”
“Yes, my fair cousin, he himself,” replied Felix in a mocking tone.
“In truth, I ought to consider myself fortunate in having at length
found a subject of conversation that can interest you, but I did not
think of being under obligations to old Hansfelt!”
“But is it not natural to regard a celebrated man with interest, and
one so justly celebrated as he?” said she, turning her eyes once more
toward her cousin. But she lowered them immediately, for the look
fastened on her was more displeasing than any she had yet met--a look
expressing at once impertinent admiration and entire want of kindness.
She wished, nevertheless, to continue the conversation, and timidly
said: “No one can deny that he is a poet whose name is familiar to 824
every one, and whose songs are in every memory.”
“As for me,” replied Felix Dornthal, “I am not fond of rhymsters; this
one is particularly disagreeable to me; and his approaching departure
does not at all afflict me.”
“Is he going away?” said Fleurange.
“Yes, it seems he has been offered a place at the court of ----, I
hardly know what position, but one that will allow him to fully
gratify his taste for old books, and at the same time--a thing by no
means to be disdained, even by a poet--give him ample means of
livelihood. He has suffered sweet violence, and in a short time we
shall be deprived of the honor of receiving him within our walls--for
ever deprived, it seems, for the kind prince, who is taking him away,
insists on his not quitting his post.”
Fleurange made no reply: her glance had just fallen on her cousin
Hilda, who was sufficiently near to hear the conversation, but not
enough so to be able to take any part in it. She saw her suddenly
stoop down to pick up a flower just fallen from her hand, and when she
rose up there was a lively color in her face. This was a natural
consequence of the movement she had just made, but what was less so
was the paleness which gradually succeeded, and the trembling of her
hand when she endeavored to raise a glass of water to her lips.
Fleurange was observing this with a vague uneasiness, when her
attention was suddenly called away by a question her Uncle Ludwig
addressed to a young man seated at Clara’s side.
This question led to a reply which momentarily deprived Fleurange of
the power of thinking of anything else.
“Steinberg,” the professor said, “look at my niece, and tell me if you
can see the resemblance spoken of.”
The young artist turned toward Fleurange, and looked at her with an
attention that, till now, had been exclusively absorbed by his fair
neighbor. All at once he exclaimed: “Yes, certainly; I remember, and I
see Count George was right. That is truly _Cordelia_ herself before
us!”
Every eye was turned toward Fleurange, and it was her turn to blush.
But why did she thus tremble from head to foot? What were the mingled
remembrances, sweet and poignant, that were suddenly recalled by the
name of _Cordelia_? Of course it was natural that she should be
affected by hearing her father’s last work mentioned--that picture
connected with so many painful associations. On the other hand, it was
that same picture which enabled her uncle to find her, and now,
appreciating more than ever the extent of this happiness, it was
perhaps natural that the name of her unknown benefactor, suddenly
pronounced in her presence, should inspire this lively and
inexpressible emotion--but was this all?
However that might be, she remained the rest of the evening troubled
and absorbed in the same thought. She had not, then, been deceived. It
was really the stranger she had seen in the studio who now owned the
picture, for he not only knew she served her father as a model, but
said the likeness was perfect. And his name was Count George! Count?
Then he was a man of high rank? What was his other name? Where did he
reside? And was he still in this city?
Fleurange wished to give utterance to these questions, but an
invincible embarrassment restrained her, and the evening passed without 825
being able to bring the conversation back to this subject. This
curiosity aroused, but only imperfectly satisfied, left a kind of
uneasiness which she reproached herself for as a fault and a want of
gratitude, when, before falling asleep that night, she recalled all
that had signalized the day when for the first time she celebrated in
the midst of her own relatives the great and memorable festival of
Christmas.
VI.
Four months had passed away, and spring had returned. It was now the
eve of Clara’s marriage and Hansfelt’s departure, and these two events
diversely preoccupied all who lived in the Old Mansion. Fleurange was
leaning over her balcony, allowing her thoughts to wander at will, but
this reverie was by no means melancholy. She felt very happy in spite
of the ideas which vaguely crossed her mind at times, like phantoms
she could not grasp. The vernal air caressed her cheeks, and the sun
gaily lighted up the old furniture in her chamber. She looked
complacently around, and gave herself Up to a sweet and overpowering
sensation of comfort. All at once, without any apparent cause, without
any particular reason for this new impression, a piercing and bitter
thought replaced all these delicious reveries: “If I had to leave this
place for ever, as I have left all the others!” she said to herself
with sudden anguish, and for some moments she could not repress the
fearful thought. She covered her eyes with her hand, and endeavored to
shake off the kind of nightmare which had seized her. She was still in
this attitude when she heard a voice under her balcony, the sound of
which was more disagreeable to her than any other.
“If I were a poet,” said the voice, “or if I only knew some of their
effusions, it would be a suitable time to quote Shakespeare:
‘Oh! that I were a glove upon that hand!’
and so forth. Prompt me, Clement: I know Italian well, but very little
English.”
These words were addressed to her by her cousin Felix Dornthal, who
was in the garden with Clement, and had stopped beneath her balcony.
The latter had his head cast down, but Felix, as usual, gazed at her
with the admiration he had displayed from the very, first day--which
was the only disagreeable and annoying thing she had known beneath her
uncle’s roof. But then, she seldom saw Felix. The company that
assembled two or three times a month in the professor’s drawing-room
was not much to the taste of his nephew, and if he had come oftener
since Fleurange’s arrival, he seldom had an opportunity of conversing
with her, for she avoided him with a care in proportion to the
increasing aversion she felt for him. Felix had, nevertheless, all the
advantage a fine figure and the manners of the world confer, with
sufficient knowledge on various subjects to appear well-informed, and
coolness and assurance enough to direct a conversation so as to shine
in it. It might, therefore, seem surprising that he inspired such a
degree of antipathy, especially when, for the first time in his life,
he seriously endeavored to produce the contrary impression.
Sympathy and antipathy are in part instinctive and uncontrollable, and
sometimes they are wholly inexplicable. They are both experienced
without always knowing the cause, and sometimes, later, they are 826
transformed and modified to such a degree as to efface the first
impulse they inspired. Perhaps it would not be impossible to prove
that upright souls are less rarely deceived in this respect than
others. However it may be, and independent of this instinctive
repulsion, the antipathy Fleurange felt was owing, among other good
reasons, to the constant irony which was so strong an ingredient in
Felix’s nature, as to wither every feeling of kindly impulse or flow
of reason around him. Goodness found no attraction in his nature, and
those who conversed with him almost ceased to believe in it
themselves. He had not discernment enough to see that Fleurange was
one of those persons who may be wounded by a compliment as well as by
an insult, and more than one flash of her large eyes was necessary to
make him comprehend it. And when he suddenly stopped, his silence
excited anxiety to know the cause of his sudden preoccupation and what
sombre cloud enwrapped him. Some insinuated with a nod of the head
that M. Heinrich Dornthal’s only son should yield with more reserve to
his love for play, and his father had repeatedly remonstrated with him
on this point. But as, apart from his whims and irregularities, Felix
had a remarkable capacity for commercial affairs, the banker was
blindly indulgent to him, and often remarked that being “perfectly
satisfied, and sure of his son in matters of _serious_ import
(meaning thereby his aptitude for business), he did not trouble
himself much about the rest, and only patiently awaited the epoch when
the marriage of his choice would lead him back to a more regular
life.”
It should be added that, for several months, the health of the head
of the Dornthal family had, without his acknowledging it, been
seriously declining. The greater part of the business formerly done by
himself was now transacted by his son, and his confidence, or his
weakness, in this respect, increased to a degree unsuspected by any
but him who was its object. The banker occasionally felt, with a
return of his former cautiousness, some anxiety on this point, but
Felix knew how to reassure him by a few words, and he now felt only
one desire, which grew stronger and stronger--to see his son married,
and settled down to a life of greater conformity with the importance
of the affairs he could transact so skilfully, and to which he had
only to give his undivided attention. He could have wished him to
choose one of his two cousins, but Felix did not find them to his
taste, and often declared that it would not be within the walls of the
Old Mansion he should find her to whom he would sacrifice his
independence. But after Fleurange entered them he suddenly changed his
tone, and his ill-concealed admiration now directed toward her all the
banker’s matrimonial hopes respecting his son.
We left Felix beneath his cousin’s balcony, his riding-whip in hand:
“Away with poetry, which is not in my line,” he soon said, “and deign
to listen, fair cousin, to the petition I am about to address you in
humble prose.”
Fleurange, still leaning on the balcony, replied: “I am listening.”
“See what a lovely spring day! My horse stands yonder: will you not
have yours saddled, and allow me to ride in your company?”
Fleurange drew herself up with an air of surprise, and shook her head
without otherwise answering.
“No?” said Felix.
“No, certainly not. How could you think of such a thing? And what claim 827
have you to become my mentor?”
“Your mentor!” repeated Felix with a frown. “I am your cousin, that is
all. Clement often has the honor of accompanying you in this way, and
I should have a share in his privileges.”
“You are mistaken,” said Fleurange tranquilly: “Clement is my brother,
and you are not.”
The smile habitual to Felix--a smile at once impertinent and
satirical, hovered on his lips:
“Assuredly not,” he said; “that is a title I am by no means ambitious
of, and am far from claiming of you.”
Fleurange blushed, and made no reply, but, at a sign from her cousins
who were in the room, she almost immediately left the balcony and went
down into the garden.
Clement remained motionless during the preceding dialogue, with his
head bent down, making flourishes on the sand with the stick in his
hand.
“Her brother!” repeated Felix in a mocking tone, as soon as Fleurange
disappeared. “Well, I have no reason to be offended. She looks upon
you as a boy, that is quite clear. It is for you to complain, if this
does not suit you.”
“It does suit me, on the contrary;” said Clement in a decided tone. “I
accept the title she gives me, and I know, when occasion requires it,
how to fulfil the obligations it imposes, and when to claim my
rights.”
“Rights! What rights?”
“The right, certainly, of protecting her! You see, boy as I am, she
has conferred it on me. It is one which I will never surrender, and
would quite willingly maintain against you, Felix, if necessary.”
“What source of inspiration have you drawn from to-day, my fine
scholar? You are not generally so fluent. Indeed, if you were only a
few years older, I should imagine the large gray eyes of our fair,
disdainful cousin had fascinated you in your turn.”
Clement did not look up; he neither blushed nor was vexed.
“Felix,” said he, “I am only nineteen years old, it is true, and you
are ten years older; but I have one advantage which the younger does
not generally possess: you do not know me. But I,” continued he,
looking him full in the face, “as you are aware, I know you well.”
At these words a black look came over Felix’s face, he bit his lips,
and would perhaps have made some angry reply had not the three girls
appeared at the end of the alley. At the sight of them Felix abruptly
turned around, and, leaping on his horse, galloped off, slightly
waving his hand to Julian Steinberg, whom he met at the garden gate.
Fleurange and her two cousins approached to meet Clara’s betrothed. “I
am late,” said he to Clara, “but you must not think it is my fault. I
have been detained by an unexpected meeting. Count George is here.”
“Count George de Walden?” said Clement, “the same one who visited the
gallery about a year ago?”
“The very one,” replied Julian; “and it was he who showed us the
beautiful Cordelia that resembles you so much, mademoiselle,” he
added, turning to Fleurange.
“And the source of our good luck in finding her,” said Hilda.
“But, since he has seen you, Gabrielle,” said Clara, “you must know
him.”
Fleurange, strangely surprised, moved, and confused, nevertheless
replied in a tolerably calm tone: “I did not know who purchased the
picture until I came here.”
“But,” persisted Clara, “you saw him, however?” 828
“Yes, once, but without speaking to him.”
“In that case, you must remember him, for Julian pretends his face is
the most remarkable one he ever saw.”
“Yes, his features are not only fine,” said Julian, “but there is in
his physiognomy and his whole appearance something--something--”
“Striking and noble,” said Clement.
“Yes, that is true.”
“Assuredly,” replied Julian; “but that is not all. There is something
extraordinary about him--how shall I express it? heroic--yes, that is
the word, he looks like a hero.”
“Of romance?” said Clara.
“No, of history: if I had to paint a celebrated soldier, or the leader
of some famous exploit, I should choose him for the original.”
“And then, he is a great lover of art,” said Clement.
“Yes,” responded Julian, “he seems, indeed, gifted in every way.”
“And is he going to remain here?” said Clara.
“Unfortunately he will not, for in that case he would be at our
wedding, but he is obliged to go to St. Petersburg without any delay.”
“What! is he a Russian?” said Clara.
“No, not wholly.”
“What do you mean by that?”
“I mean he is a Livonian or a native of Courland, I do not know
exactly which. But he is one of the emperor’s subjects, and cannot
trifle with his orders, which obliged him to leave Florence suddenly,
where he was, and now forces him to keep swiftly on his way.”
The conversation took another turn, of which Fleurange did not hear a
word. As soon as she had an excuse for leaving her cousins, she
returned to her chamber, where she took a small note-book from her
pocket, and carefully inscribed therein the name of Count George de
Walden.
[160] The use of the second person singular, indicative of
familiarity in most European languages, has not been
retained in this translation.
----------
THE MARTYRDOM OF ST. AGNES.
“Sancta Agnes! ora pro nobis.”
Calm she stood,
An ivory statue, yet instinct with life,
So stately was that gently breathing form
Of grace and dignity so perfect, yet
With all youth’s pliant softness.
On her brow,
White as the ocean pearl when first the waves
Complaining cast their treasure on the shore,
Was stamped the seal of that creating hand
Whose spirit dwelt within that temple rare,
Her holy virgin heart; and from her eyes,
Soul-lit, beamed forth the splendor and the depth
Of that informing mind whose lights they were,
Until you heeded not their violet hues,
Their lashes long, or nobly arching brows. 829
Her flossy hair was colored like the sun,
Her cheeks were opal-tinted, like the hues
Of rosy sunset mingled with the pure
Soft paly whiteness of the maiden moon.
Her mouth was a pomegranate-flower, with all
Its crimson sweetness, and her rounded chin,
Love’s finger touching, had impressed therein
A lovely dimple, thus completing well
The virgin beauty of that angel face.
A young and princely Roman knight drew near,
And bent upon the noble maid his glance,
Wherein the fire of earthly passion blazed,
Yet tempered by a tear of pity born.
“Agnes! my Agnes!” in a suppliant voice
He spake; “Oh! dost thou shun my clasping arms,
And rather choose this grim and ghastly death,
To dower with all thy charms? Oh! let me place
Upon that fairest hand this spousal ring,
Pledge of our future nuptials; then shall all
This dark and bloody pageantry of death,
The axe, the block, the gloomy lictors, all
Pass from thy sight for ever. Agnes! speak!”
The virgin answered not nor seemed to hear,
Her eyes in raptured trance raised to the skies,
Till from her parted lips in angel tones
Low murmuring music broke: “O thou my Lord!
Jesus! my Spouse! my All! my only Love!
Am I not thine alone? upon my brow
Hast thou not left thy signet? on this hand
Hast thou not placed thy ring, the golden ring,
Of our divine espousals heavenly pledge?
Come, O my Love! I long to view thy face,
Come, take thine Agnes to thine own embrace;
For ever with the Lord!” The thrilling tones
Lapsed into silence. On the lictors all,
She smiled--a heavenly smile; and then she knelt,
Bowing her gentle head upon the block,
Her golden tresses, parted for the blow,
Swept the dry sand so soon to drink her blood.
An instant, and the dazzling gleam of steel
Flashed through the air; it fell, and rose again--
All--all was o’er; e’en then the virgin bride
Stood on the sea of glass before her Lord.
The martyred virgin bride, crowned by his hand
With palms of triumph, and the lilies white,
Meet emblems of her purity and faith.
----------
CATHOLICITY AND PANTHEISM. 830
NO. XIII.
THE COSMOS IN TIME AND SPACE--CONTINUED.
In the preceding article, we have seen that, in consequence of the
sacramental extension of the Theanthropos in time and space,
substantial creation in its highest and noblest element, which is
personality, has received its last initial and inchoative perfection
of being, by the union of human persons with the Theanthropos by means
of his substantial and sacramental presence, and through that union
the elevation to a higher similitude of and communication with the
three persons of the infinite. Now, this last complement of the
cosmos, this union of the Theanthropos, with human persons, through
his sacramental extension in time and space, constitutes the Catholic
Church, which may be defined to be:
_The Theanthropos present in the cosmos through the sacraments, and
through them incorporating into himself human persons in time and
space, raising them to a higher similitude of and communication with
the three personalities of the infinite, and thus not only realizing
the highest initial perfection of the cosmos, but also unfolding and
developing that initial perfection, and bringing it to its ultimate
completion in palingenesia._
The Theanthropos, therefore, has placed himself in the very centre of
the cosmos by his sacramental and substantial presence, as became his
great office and prerogative of mediator. By those moments of his
sacramental presence to which he has only attached his infinite energy
and power, he disposes and fits human persons for the real
incorporation into himself in the following manner: By the sacramental
moment of order, through the moral instrument in whom this moment is
realized, he propounds and explains his doctrine, the _gnosis_
respecting God, and the cosmos which he came to reveal to men. By the
sacramental moment of regeneration, he infuses into human persons the
term of the supernatural order in its essence and faculties, and thus
raises them to a higher state of being, and to a closer communication
with the Trinity, but all this in an initial and inchoative state. By
the sacramental moment, called confirmation, he brings that essence
and its faculties to a definite and determinate growth. When human
persons are thus fitted and prepared, he by his substantial presence
incorporates them into himself, and enables their supernatural being
to live and develop itself by being put in real, actual communication
with all the proper objects of its faculties. Thus, the cosmos of
personalities, perfected in its initial supernatural state, can act
and develop itself--the Theanthropos himself, through his moral
agents, organically constituted, governing and directing its action to
the safest and speediest acquirement of its last perfection.
From this metaphysical idea of the church, derived and resulting from 831
its very essence, it follows:
First, That, next to the Theanthropos, the Catholic Church is the end
of all the exterior works of the infinite. The supreme end of the
exterior works was the highest possible communication of the infinite
to the finite. This was primarily realized in the hypostatic union
which bound all created natures to the infinite, and is realized next
in the union of all personalities with the Theanthropos, and through
him with the Trinity. Now, the very essence of the Catholic Church
consists in this union. Consequently, as such it is the _last supreme
imperative_ law of the cosmos. The last, because with it closes the
cycle of the creative act, and begins the cycle of the return of the
terms to their principle and cause. Supreme, because no higher initial
perfection of the cosmos can be realized after supposing its
existence. Imperative, because it is a necessary complement of the
plan of the cosmos.
Hence, without the Catholic Church the cosmos of personalities would
have no aim or object. It would stand alone, and unconnected with the
other parts of the cosmos, the particular end of each personality
could never be attained, and the whole would present a confused mass
of elements, without order, harmony, or completion.