CHAPTER II.

GOD THE CREATOR.

"In the beginning GOD created the heaven and the earth."--Gen. i. 1.

"GOD that made the world and all things therein.... He is Lord of heaven

and earth."--Acts xvii. 24.

"The Eternal Will is the creator of the world as He is the creator of

the finite person."--FICHTE.

_God is the first principle, the unconditioned cause of all existence._

This is the answer of Christian doctrine to the great problem presented

for solution in the preceding chapter. Whether this fundamental

presupposition shall be finally accepted as the only adequate solution

of the problem of existence will depend in a large degree upon our

apprehension of the Christian idea of God. We shall, therefore, open the

discussion by asking the question--What is the content of our conception

of God?

Dogmatic theology might rest satisfied with the simple affirmation,

"_God is_ GOD,"[17] as against all the captious demands of science, were

it not necessary to render an account to itself of what, at first sight,

might be pronounced a "sublime tautology." For, while it is hereby

confessed that God in his essential being is incomprehensible and

ineffable, so that to the Christian as well as to the philosopher he is

"the great Unknown," still it is not hereby admitted that it is

absolutely impossible to know God. To affirm that God is absolutely "the

Unknowable" is simply to assert his unreality. Mr. Martineau has finely

observed that this term is self-contradictory; for we affirm by the use

of it that we know so much that He can not be known. Nay, it assumes the

existence of God, and in the same breath separates us from Him forever.

But if it be admitted that God _is_, it can not be absolutely impossible

to know _what_ He is. The knowledge of existence and the form of

existence mutually condition each other. There must be something in the

understanding answering to the term in the language of mankind, and

there must be something in the realm of being which is the ground of the

idea in the reason of Man. The heathen have a presentiment, a dim

intuition of the "unknown God," and the inspired teacher may so "declare

Him" in human language that his hearers may receive a definite notion,

and attain to a practical knowledge of God.

The _idea_ of God is a common phenomenon of the universal intelligence

of our race, and must have been present to the thought of man even

before he uttered the _name_ of God.[18] The moment man becomes

conscious of himself, and knows himself as distinct from the world, that

same moment he becomes conscious of a _Higher Self_--a living Power upon

which both himself and the world depend. For this Higher Self all

nations have found a name. All languages have a term cognate with the

Saxon "God," which expresses that spontaneous consciousness of a

supernatural power which is common to all minds--that intuition of a

supramundane existence which is the ground and reason of all other

existence. Even Polytheism has a name for the abstract of all the gods,

which sets forth the ideas of being, power, causality, and personality.

And in Christian lands the term God, without any periphrasis, at once

represents the idea of a Being distinct from self and the world, who is

the Maker of the world and the Father of humanity. For all practical

ends it is enough to say God is _God_. It is only when reflective

thought seeks to express some more specific and determinate conception

of the Supreme Being that we find ourselves under the necessity of

adding other expletives to this term God.

It is therefore desirable that we should set down, in a provisional

form, the general conception of God as it exists in the mind of the

Theist and the Christian. I can not do this better than by selecting

from the writings of three men of diverse schools of thought--one a

Physicist, another a Metaphysician, the third a Theologian; and all in a

greater or less degree influenced by the teaching of the Christian

Scriptures.

My first selection will be from the "Meditations" of Descartes, who is

regarded as "the father of modern philosophy." "By the name of God,"

says he, "I mean an infinite, eternal, immutable, independent,

omniscient, omnipresent substance, by which I and all other things which

are have been created and produced."[19]

My second selection is from the "Principia" of Sir Isaac Newton, a work

which, by the general consent of the scientific world, is the greatest

contribution ever made to science. Sir Isaac Newton was a Physicist

rather than a Metaphysician; he will therefore represent to us the

conception of God entertained by the scientific Theist. At the close of

this his great work he writes: "The true God is a living, intelligent,

powerful Being, and, from His other perfections, it follows that He is

Supreme, or most perfect. He is eternal and infinite, omnipotent and

omniscient; that is, His duration reaches from eternity to eternity, His

presence from infinity to infinity. He governs all things, and knows all

things that are or can be done. He is not eternity and infinity, but

eternal and infinite. He is not duration or space, but He endures and is

present. He endures forever, and He is every where present; and by

existing always and every where, He constitutes [or causes] duration and

space. Since every particle of space is _always_, and every indivisible

moment of duration is _every where_, certainly the Maker and Lord of all

things can not be _never_ and _nowhere_.... God is the same God, always

and every where. He is omnipresent, not _virtually_ [potentially] only,

but also substantially; for virtue can not subsist without substance. In

Him all things are contained and moved, yet neither affects the other.

God suffers nothing from the motion of bodies; bodies find no resistance

from the omnipresence of God. It is allowed by all that the Supreme God

exists necessarily; and by the same necessity exists _always_ and _every

where_.... We know Him only by His most wise and excellent contrivances

of things and final causes; we admire Him for His perfections; but we

reverence and adore Him on account of His dominion. A God without

dominion, providence, and final causes is nothing else but Fate and

Nature. Blind mechanical necessity, which is certainly the same always

and every where, could produce no variety of things. All that diversity

of natural things which we find suited to different times and places

could arise from nothing but the _ideas_ and _will_ of a Being

necessarily existing."

My last selection is from the "Grammar of Assent," by John Henry Newman,

formerly a Protestant, now a Catholic divine. Prior to his change of

theological position he published a remarkable work "On the Development

of Christian Doctrine in Aid of a Grammar of Assent," the design of

which is to exhibit the influence of philosophic thought upon the

evolution of Christian doctrine, and to bring it into harmony with the

theories of Cosmical, Physiological, and Historical development, which

seem for the present to be in the ascendant. For this reason I choose to

employ his words, as setting forth the conception of God which is

generally entertained by thoughtful men. At page ninety-seven of his

last work, "The Grammar of Assent," I read:

"There is one God, such and such in Nature and Attributes. I say 'such

and such,' for, unless I explain what I mean by _one God_, I use words

which may mean any thing or nothing. I may mean a mere _anima mundi_; or

an initial principle which once was in action and now is not; or

collective humanity. I speak then of the one God of the Theist and of

the Christian: a God who is numerically One, who is Personal; the

Author, Sustainer, and Finisher of all things, the Life of Law and

Order, the moral Governor. One who is Supreme and Sole; like Himself,

unlike all things besides Himself, which all are but his creatures;

distinct from, independent of, them all. One who is self-existing,

absolutely infinite, who has ever been and ever will be, to whom nothing

is past or future; who is all perfection, and the fullness and archetype

of every possible excellence, the Truth itself, Wisdom, Love, Justice,

Holiness; One who is All-powerful, All-knowing, Omnipresent,

Incomprehensible. These are some of the distinctive prerogatives which

I ascribe unconditionally and unreservedly to the great Being whom I

call God."

These statements of the Theistic conception will be regarded by most men

as adequate and satisfactory. They will be accepted by the scientific

Theist and approved by the dogmatic Theologian. They present the idea of

God within the sphere of Christian thought; that is, reflective thought

informed and illuminated by the revelations of God which are given in

the Christian Scriptures. At the same time it must be confessed that

they are defective in scientific form, philosophical development, and

logical articulation. They do not present the conception of God in

harmony with any _principles of Rational Integration_. They show no

attempt to combine the various elements of this conception in the unity

of an _Absolute Principle_, an _Ultimate and Fundamental Idea_.

The aim of all true philosophy is to attain to the insight of First

Principles, yea, to the insight of the Absolute First Principle from

which whatever now _is_ must be derived, and in which whatever _is_ must

have its intelligible ground and sufficient reason. There exists in man,

as the essential characteristic of his humanity, a power or faculty of

intelligence, best named the _Reason_, which awakens in him the desire

and furnishes to him the law that enables him to fulfill the inherent

desire of combining all his manifold knowledges in the unity of such

_Absolute First Principle_; and the one fundamental law of this faculty

is the _Law of Sufficient Reason_, which has been thus enounced by

Leibnitz: "Whatever exists, or begins to be, must have a sufficient

reason for its existence, and why it is as it is, and not otherwise;"

or, to give the principle a fuller, and at the same time a legitimate

expansion--For all genesis, or beginning, there must be an adequate

_Cause_; beneath all appearance, all changeful and fleeting phenomena,

there must be a permanent _Being_ or _Reality_; beyond all the diverse

and manifold, there must be an ultimate _Identity_, an incomposite

indivisible _Unity_; and in all order and special adaptation, there must

be a unifying _Thought_, a definite _Purpose_ and _End_.

The Reason of man can find satisfaction and harmony only in the

recognition of an Absolute First Principle which shall comprehend and

unite all these universal and necessary ideas which are the correlates

of the facts of experience; that is, an Absolute First Principle which

shall be the Ultimate Reality, the Ultimate Cause, the Ultimate Unity,

and the Ultimate Reason of all existence. In other words, the Reason is

not and can not be satisfied without "the clear insight of a _Causative

Principle_ containing, predetermining, and producing all the actual

results we see around us, with their orderly relations in reference to a

final purpose, reason, or end; and which causative principle exists not

only as the originative and constructive, but also as the conservative

energy of all things;" a Being who "is before all things, and by whom

all things consist," "from whom, in whom, and to whom are all things."

And now what is this Absolute First Principle, causative of all

existence, which the spontaneous reason has always intuitively

apprehended, and which the reflective reason has always found to be the

adequate, and only adequate explanation of the universe? I answer in a

word, it is AN UNCONDITIONED WILL OR SELF-DIRECTIVE POWER, SEEING ITS

OWN WAY, AND HAVING THE REASON AND LAW OF ITS ACTION IN ITSELF ALONE.

This always and every where has been intuitively apprehended, with more

or less clearness, as standing at the fountain-head of all existence.

This, then, we shall postulate as the fundamental axiom of all rational

integration, viz., AN UNCONDITIONED WILL, _the principle of all Reality,

all Efficiency, and all Perfection_.

1. An unconditioned Will which realizes itself in IPSËITY--self-potency

and self-affirmation; expresses itself in that august name of God "I

AM;" and constitutes ABSOLUTE REALITY.

2. An unconditioned Will which manifests itself in

ALTERITY--pluri-efficiency; utters itself in the "I WILL" of the

creative fiat; and constitutes INFINITE EFFICIENCY.

3. An unconditioned Will which returns to itself in TOTALITY--a complete

Ideal to be realized in Creation; which expresses its satisfaction in

pronouncing all things "very good," and constitutes PERFECT PERSONALITY.

The changeless correlation and inherent harmony of these ideas of the

reason (Reality, Efficiency, and Personality) may be rendered more

obvious by the following formula, after the method of Coleridge's "polar

logic."[20]

_PROTHESIS_

UNCONDITIONED WILL

/ | \

/-----------------/ | \------------------\

_THESIS_ / _MESOTHESIS_ \_ANTITHESIS_

/ | \

IPSËITY-----Efficient CAUSALITY Efficient----ALTERITY

\ | /

\ Final /

\-----------------\ | /------------------/

\ | /

TOTALITY

_SYNTHESIS_

PROTHESIS expresses the absolute identity or eternal co-inherence of

Reason, Love, and Power (the Divine Essence). THESIS expresses Power in

the form of Love (the Divine Self-sufficiency and Self-potency).

ANTITHESIS expresses Reason in the form of Power (the Divine

Efficiency). SYNTHESIS expresses the diversity in unity of Reason, Love,

and Power (the Divine Perfection). And MESOTHESIS expresses the

essential correlations which integrate the whole (the Triunity of the

manifested God). Thus Absolute Reality, Infinite Efficiency, and Perfect

Personality are all, as a triplicity, contained in the fundamental unity

of an unconditioned Will, which has Love as its motive, Power as its

agent, and Reason as its light and law.

And now let us retire within our own consciousness, and see if this

fundamental axiom of rational integration--Will as the principle of all

Reality, Efficiency, and Perfection--is not reflected in our reason, and

evolved in our inner experience. Do we not find that the central point

of our consciousness--that which makes each man what he is in

contradistinction from every other man--that which expresses the _real

essence of the soul_ apart from its formal processes and regulative

laws--is the WILL? Without Will man would fall back from the elevation

which he now assumes to the level of impersonal nature: in a word, he

would be a _thing_, and not a _power_. Power, spontaneity, causality,

will--these, or similar forms, express, as nearly as can be, the

essential nature or principle of the human soul.[21] Furthermore, it is

obvious that mere Power or Energy does not suffice for the notion of

Will--there must also be Reason and Affection.[22] Indeed, "Will is

contemplated universally as the inseparable union and perpetual

differentiation of Intelligence and originative Power, and as such the

sole ground of the intelligibility of all causation."[23]

A volitional act, a moral and responsible act, must be one which is

performed under the influence of motives, and for which, when called to

account, we can assign valid reasons. All true volition supposes a

purpose or end to be realized, an inward appetency or motive which makes

the end desirable, and the selection and adaptation of means to

accomplish that end. Power divorced from reason is simply _blind force_,

and can not be dignified with the name of Will. The mind of man is

sometimes in a predominant state of _knowing_, sometimes in a

predominant state of _feeling_, and sometimes in a predominant state of

_determination_. To call these separate faculties, however, is

altogether beside the mark. No act of intelligence can be performed

without some determination of the Ego, no act of determination without

some cognition, and no act of the one or the other without some amount

of feeling being mingled in the process. Thus, while each mental state

may have its distinctive characteristics, there is unity at the

root--_the identical Ego, spirit_, WILL.[24]

Sensibility is the condition, Reason is the light, Will is the centre of

human consciousness. Consciousness is a threefold phenomenon in which

feeling, knowing, and self-determination are reciprocal elements, and in

their connection and simultaneousness, and at the same time their

differentiation, they compose the entire intellectual life.[25] The

finite spirit or will unfolds itself, first, subjectively, in the

spontaneous affirmation of self-being or self-potency (IPSËITY);

secondly, objectively, in the exertion of power to produce motion,

change, phenomena (EFFICIENCY); thirdly, synthetically, in the unity of

motive and intention, purpose and act, means and end (PERSONALITY).

Thus does "Will present the middle point, which embraces _thought_ on

the one hand and _force_ on the other; and which yet, so far from

appearing to us to be a _compound_ arising out of them as an effect, is

more easily conceived as the originative prefix (prothesis) of all

mental phenomena.... It carries with it, in its very idea, the

co-presence of thought as the necessary element within whose sphere it

has to manifest itself; its phenomena can not exist alone; it acts on

preconceptions, which stand related to it, not however as its source,

but as its conditions, and are its co-ordinates in the effect, rather

than its generating antecedents."[26]

Psychological analysis leads us inevitably to this conclusion, that all

things are issued by Will, whether in the sphere of the finite or the

infinite, and therefore we postulate an UNCONDITIONED WILL, A PERFECT

MIND, at the source of all becoming. Thus, as Martineau truly remarks,

_between the_ FORCE _of the physical atheist and the_ THOUGHT _of the

metaphysical pantheist_, _we fix upon_ WILL _as the true balancing-point

of a moral theism_.

The intelligent reader scarce needs to be reminded that this is the

conclusion reached by reflective thought in that best and fullest

exhibition of it which is found in Greek philosophy. The great problem

of Greek philosophy, as of all philosophy, was, "What is the ἀρχῆ, the

First Principle--the ground and cause and reason of all existence?" The

final answer of that age is found in Plato, for Platonism was the

culmination, the ripened fruit of the ages of earnest thought which

preceded Plato. He gathered up, co-ordinated, and grasped into unity the

results bequeathed by the mental efforts of his predecessors. The

Platonic answer to this great question of philosophy is clear and

unequivocal. A perfect MIND is the primal source of all being--a Mind in

which Intellect, Efficiency, and Goodness are one and identical. "Mind

is the most worthy ἀρχῆ." "God is the most excellent of causes."[27]

"Mind is king of heaven and earth."[28] "Motion and life and soul and

mind are present with absolute being. We can not imagine being to be

devoid of life and mind, remaining in awful unmeaningness and

everlasting fixture."[29]

"Whatever begins to be, must necessarily be produced by some cause; for

nothing can have its generation without a cause." "The Maker and Father

of the universe ... had no beginning of his being." He formed the

universe according to the eternal model or archetype which his own

reason supplied, and for motives which his own essential goodness

proposed. "Let us now tell for what cause the Maker of this creation and

this universe made it as it is. He was _good_; and he who is good

grudges no advantage to any creature. Being thus free from envy, He

willed that the universe should be good like Himself; and this, the

special ground of the creation and the world, which we receive from the

wisest philosophers, we must accept."[30]

It would be easy to show that the recognition of intelligent Will, as

standing at the fountain-head of all the force which is manifested in

the universe, is common to the first Physicists of this age.

Grove concludes his admirable essay on "The Correlation of the Physical

Forces" with these words: "In all phenomena the more closely they are

investigated the more are we convinced that, humanly speaking, neither

matter nor force can be created or annihilated, and that an essential

cause is unattainable [by science]--_Causation is the_ WILL, _Creation

is the act_, _of God_."[31] Sir John Herschel has not hesitated to

express his conviction that "it is but reasonable to regard the Force of

Gravitation as the direct or indirect result of a consciousness or a

WILL existing somewhere."[32] Dr. Carpenter, with his usual sagacity in

penetrating to the essential point, remarks that the WILL "is that form

of Force which must be taken as the type of all the rest;" "Force must

be regarded as the direct expression of WILL."[33] "If," says Wallace,

"we have traced one force, however minute, to an origin in our own WILL,

while we have no knowledge of any other primary cause of force, it does

not seem an improbable conclusion that _all force may be_ WILL-FORCE,

and thus the whole universe is not only dependent on, but actually is

the will of higher intelligences or of one Supreme Intelligence."[34] In

short, the present attitude of science in relation to this great problem

is, I think, fairly represented by the Duke of Argyll: "Science, in the

modern doctrine of the Conservation of Energy and the Convertibility of

Forces, is already getting hold of the idea that all kinds of Force are

but forms and manifestations of some one Central Force issuing from

some one Fountain-head of Power." "This one Force, into which all others

return again, is itself but a mode of action of the Divine WILL."[35]

Even Spencer concedes that "the Force by which we ourselves produce

changes, and which serves to symbolize the cause of changes in general,

is the final disclosure of all analysis ... all other modes of

consciousness are derived from our consciousness of exerting Force."[36]

"The order of nature is doubtless very imperfect, but its production is

far more compatible with the hypothesis of an intelligent will than with

that of blind mechanism."[37] Physical science is surely coming into

harmony with metaphysical thought. It looks upon nature with the eye of

reason as well as the eye of sense. And it reduces the phenomena to

unity, not simply by comparative abstraction, which classifies under

resemblance, co-existence, and succession, but by that rational

integration which operates under the necessary laws of substance,

causality, intentionality, and absolute unity. It regards the forces of

nature as the product or manifestation of a higher force--a force which

is not merely dynamical in its nature--a force which can compass not

merely concurrent and antagonistic motions in space, but which is able

so to adjust these concurrences and antagonisms as to construct agencies

which shall realize designs--a force, therefore, which is thoughtful and

percipient: in one word, intelligent--a force, in fine, which is not a

mere mechanical dynamism in space and time, but a true Power existing in

its type and fullness: in one word--God.[38]

Thus does all reflective thought, whether directed to the phenomena of

the human mind or the phenomena of nature, confirm the _à priori_

intuition of an unconditioned Will unfolding itself in Thought and

Power, and completing itself in a harmonious Totality, as the First

Principle and Originative Cause of all existences and of all relations,

of all individual beings, and of that harmonious whole men call the

Cosmos.

And now we pass to the important question--How are we to bring all our

acquired conceptions of God into harmony with this fundamental idea?

Assuming that we have certain conceptions of God which are derived from

verbal instruction, and ultimately from Divine revelation, can we bring

these into unity under this First Principle? Or, in other words, can we

logically evolve the attributes and perfections of God out of this

fundamental Idea, and find the result in harmony with the Christian

doctrine?

As the object of thought, even of Christian thought, God must

necessarily be conceived by us under the fundamental categories of

_Being_, _Attribute_, and _Relation_. All objects of thought must come

under these categories, and out of or beyond these categories we can not

think at all. Furthermore, we can not think of God as the unconditioned

Being conditioning Himself, without conceiving Him as _Reality_,

_Efficiency_, and _Personality_. These constitute the conception of the

Divine essence whereby it is what it is. When we think of the Attributes

of such a Being, we must necessarily conceive them as _Absolute_,

_Infinite_, and _Perfect_.[39] And when we think of the Relations of

God to finite existences and finite consciousness, we are constrained to

regard Him as the _Ground_ and _Cause_ and _Reason_ of all dependent

being.

In the unity and completeness of this categorical scheme of thought, we

can not fail to recognize the following logical order:

BEING (Essentia) REALITY } EFFICIENCY } PERSONALITY }

ATTRIBUTE (Related Essence) ABSOLUTE } INFINITE } PERFECT }

RELATION (Free Determination) GROUND CAUSE REASON OR END

In the Absolute Reality we have the ultimate ground; in the Infinite

Efficiency we have the adequate cause; and in the Perfect Personality we

have the sufficient reason or final cause of all existence.

1. BEING or ESSENCE, as _Reality_, _Efficiency_, and _Personality_. The

intuition of Being is the most fundamental and the most abstract of all

ideas. After every property and relation has been eliminated, there

still remains the affirmation that something _is_. Non-existence, except

as the negation of being, is inconceivable. But, at the same time, pure

being is the most indeterminate of all ideas. Simple being, without

attributes, and out of all relation to other ideas, is a notion without

contents, and consequently indescribable and unknowable. For us,

therefore, pure abstract being is equal to non-being, and the paradox of

Hegel has some truth: Pure Being = Nothing.

Distinction--differentiation, determination--is the condition of all

reality. Real being must be determined, only pure nothing can be

undetermined. The least determined being is the least real; the most

determined is the most real, the most perfect being. Exactly in

proportion as the nature of beings is differentiated and complicated do

they rise in the scale of being. The vegetable has more determinations

than inanimate matter; the percipient animal has more determinations

than the vital plant; rational man has more determinations than the

percipient animal, he is the most complicated, the most determined, and

therefore the most perfect being in creation. An absolutely perfect

being must be the most determined of all beings; he must contain within

himself a fullness of determinations.

The pantheist Spinoza tells us that determination is negation--that is,

limitation. "_Omnis determinatio negatio est._" Nothing can be falser or

more arbitrary than this principle. Its fallacy consists in the

confusion of two things essentially different, namely, the _limits of a

being_, and _its determinate characteristics_. A pure Ego, by

determining itself to thought, affection, or action, is not thereby

limited. The limitation or the illimitation depends simply upon the

character of the thought, affection, or act as perfect or imperfect. "I

am an intelligent being, and my intelligence is limited; these are two

facts equally certain. The possession of intelligence is the

constitutive characteristic of my being which distinguishes me from the

brute. The limitation imposed upon my intellect, which can only see a

small number of truths at a time, is my limit, and this is what

distinguishes me from the Absolute Being, from Perfect Intelligence

which sees all truths at a glance. That which constitutes my

imperfection is not certainly my being intelligent; therein, on the

contrary, lies the strength, the richness, and the dignity of my being.

What constitutes my weakness and my nothingness is that this

intelligence is inclosed in a narrow circle. Thus, inasmuch as I am

intelligent, I participate in being and perfection; inasmuch as I am

only intelligent within certain limits, I am imperfect."[40]

Determination differs from limitation as much as being differs from

nothing.

The Causative Principle of all reality must itself be _real_, that is,

it must be a self-manifesting and self-conscious power, for there can be

no reality without consciousness. Being which is not known to itself,

and can not manifest itself, is as though it were not. Intuition, _sui

conscia_, is the essence of reality. Here being and knowing are

identical. It must also contain within itself a fullness of

determinations, must be rich in ideas, must be the archetype of all

possible existences. All forms and relations, all ideas and laws, all

individual and special adaptations, all harmonious systems, must be

present to the Absolute Reality. "Uncreated must be Mental Being. This

seems an invincible necessity of all thought. Whatever else, or whatever

more it is, it must be Mental Being" = REASON.

The Causative Principle of all efficiency must itself be _power_,

pluri-efficiency, it must be self-determined and self-moved, and

perfectly adequate to the production of being, motion, change, life, and

intelligence objective to itself; in a word, it must be adequate to the

realization of all the ideals which reason supplies; it must be

unlimited Infinite Efficiency = SPIRIT.

The Causative Principle of all personality must itself be

_personal_--that is, it must have a self-conceived, self-determined

purpose; must freely choose and wisely adapt the means to realize that

purpose; above all, it must have a worthy motive, a best and highest

reason for both purpose and act; and must make all conform to and result

in a moral order in harmony with the blessedness and worthy the

approbation of the All-perfect One. Intuition and choice, affection and

conscience--these are the grand momenta of personality.

The necessary demand of reason is that the first and originative cause

of all finite personality shall be Himself a person. Consciousness can

not arise out of unconsciousness, reason can not be generated from

unreason, personality can not have its birth from impersonality, no more

than something can be born of nothing. There must be intelligence

answering to our intelligence, freedom answering to our freedom, feeling

responding to our feeling, and moral sentiment unisonant with our moral

sentiment: in short, personality correlated with our personality, in the

cause and author of finite responsible being. That perfection which is

mirrored in our finite personality exists in all its fullness in the

unconditionally perfect Being, the Perfect Personality whose name is

LOVE.[41]

God, then, is the Absolute, Infinite, and Perfect Being in whom, by

whom, and for whom the finite has existence and consciousness. He is

_the unconditioned, conditionating Will_. The Divine Essence can not be

apprehended or expressed in a higher universal. This is the first dim

intuition of spontaneous reason, and the final goal of all reflective

thought. The Divine Being is He who is before all, and who originates,

destines, and conditions all. The Biblical idea of the unconditioned

Being is in perfect harmony with the philosophical idea. In the language

of Scripture, "the Will of God" stands for the remotest, inmost essence

of the Godhead--a will which is the absolute identity, the eternal

co-inherence of reason, power, and love. The Divine Will as efficient

cause is never dissociated from the Divine Will as the formal cause and

the final cause. That will is at once cause and law and reason of all

things. God "effectuates all things according to the _counsel_ (τὴν

βουλὴν = deliberation, purpose, design) of his own Will" (Eph. i.

11). And not only according to the counsel, but "according to the _good

pleasure_ (τὴν εὐδοκίαν = the benevolent affection) of his

own will" (ver. 5); a "good pleasure which He hath PURPOSED (προέθετο)

in Himself" (ver. 9). He "created all things, and for his

own _pleasure_ (θέλημα = will) they are and were created."

Here "Will" is clearly more than power, more than efficiency: it is

thought or purpose; it is reason or end; in a word, it is the identity

and co-inherence of reason, power, and love. The unconditioned Will as

revealed to us in Scripture is an _intelligent_ Will--a will that

thinks, deliberates, counsels, designs; and it is also a _benevolent_

Will--a will that loves and delights in and desires the good of being.

And in thinking and desiring it effectuates, for thinking and operating,

desiring and doing, are one with God. "He speaks and it is done, He

commands and it stands fast." Creation is a speech of God, a language in

which He reveals his thoughts, his purposes, his benevolent designs, his

will--that is, Himself. Every revelation of God is the development in us

of the consciousness of the REAL BEING (τὸ ὄντως ὄν). All the proofs of

the being of God--the etiological, the cosmological, the teleological,

and the moral--are centred in the _ontological_: this is first and last.

And just as our consciousness of the indivisible identical EGO as the

unity and co-inherence of reason, feeling, and power is the exact

arresting-point of psychological science, beyond which thought can not

pass, so our intuition of the unconditioned BEING as the absolute

identity of Reason, Power, and Love is the exact arresting point of

Theological science, beyond which nothing can be known. Spirit, Light,

Love--these designate essence or being. "GOD IS SPIRIT" (πνεῦμα =

Spirit, not a Spirit--John iv. 24), the self-moving, efficient,

animating principle, the unity and life-motion of the creative divine

activity; ἡ ζωὴ αἰώνιος--vita absoluta--underived, eternal Life (John v.

26; xi. 25; 1 John v. 20). GOD IS LIGHT (1 John i. 5), the

self-manifesting, intuitional, revealing principle = ὁ λόγος; the

Eternal Reason, in which Spirit becomes objective to itself, and God is

revealed to Himself (John i. 1; 1 Tim. vi. 16). GOD IS LOVE (1 John iv.

8, 16), the self-complete, self-sufficient, self-satisfying principle =

τὸ τέλος, the Perfect One (Matth. v. 48). This Divine Love finds its

fullest satisfaction in the κόσμος νοητός, the intelligible world as

revealed and rendered objective to Himself in "the WORD." Reason,

Spirit, Love are the simplest elements in the conception of the

unconditioned Being: Reason as Reality, Spirit as Efficiency, and Love

as Perfection.

The unconditioned Being is revealed, may we not say "incarnated,"[42] in

the κόσμος αἴσθησις--the sensible world: 1, by the incarnation

of the Spirit in the moving and animating forces of nature; 2, by the

incarnation of the Reason in the typical forms and permanent laws or

relations of the universe, by which reality becomes known to finite

minds; 3, by the incarnation of Love in the final causes, the benevolent

purposes, which are realized in the completed Cosmos and the life of

Humanity.[43]

2. ATTRIBUTE OR RELATED ESSENCE. The knowledge of the Divine Essence is

the root of the knowledge of the Divine Attributes, for in every

conception of an attribute the Divine Essence is, in some mode or other,

supposed. We may therefore define an attribute as a conception of the

unconditioned Being under some relation to our consciousness. That

conception may be either positive or negative, and the relation may

consequently be one of causation or abstraction.

When we conceive of the Divine Essence as _reality_, our conception is

in some measure determined by our consciousness of reality. The

intuition of reality is immanent to our own consciousness. We know self

as a reality, an indivisible, identical Ego--a unity, but yet a

conditioned and dependent reality, which must have its ground and cause

in an independent and unconditioned reality. Thus the pure intuition of

reality is a preluding for the affirmation of absolute reality. We can

not, however, affirm such reality on purely subjective grounds. To the

eye of reason, which is the organ of necessary and absolute truth, the

Divine Essence abstracts itself from the limits of space and time, and

absolves itself from all the determinations of objective being. It is a

reality which is not conditioned by _kind_, a reality which is

independent of, absolved from, undetermined by any other antecedent or

contemporaneous being--absolute reality.

Furthermore, when we conceive the Divine Essence as _power_ or

efficiency, our conception is in some measure determined by our

consciousness of power. We know ourselves as a power, a cause of our own

volitions, and a power which can control and modify external nature, but

yet a limited and finite cause. To the eye of reason the Divine

efficiency transcends all limitation and mensuration. It is a power

which is not conditioned by _quantity_. It is limitless power,

spaceless, all-mighty presence, self-directive power, carrying its own

light and seeing its own way--infinite efficiency.

And, finally, when we conceive of the Divine Essence as _personality_,

again our conception is in some measure determined by our consciousness

of personality. We are conscious of desiring and purposing, of

determining and doing, of approving and delighting in our artistic and

ethical creations, and in these we stand out from the plane of nature as

persons and not things. But we are also conscious of limitation and

imperfection. We fall short even of our own ideals; we feel we have

unsatisfied longings and daily wants. The Divine Essence reveals itself

to reason as exempt from all limitation by _degree_. "Pure personality

is no more limited than absolute being, but it is deeper by all the

contents of perfect consciousness." It is a personality which has no

defect and no want: unconditioned, unlimited perfection--perfect

personality.

Our conception of the Attributes of God may thus be formed through some

relation to our consciousness, but by a process of immediate

abstraction--the negation of all limitation by kind, by quantity, or by

degree.

1. As related to our intuition of real being; by abstraction from all

other being and personality--the _Immanent_ attributes of God.

2. As causally related to finite, dependent existence; by elimination of

all necessary limitation--the _Relative or Transitive_ attributes of

God.

3. As ethically related to finite personality; by elimination of all

imperfection--the _Moral_ attributes of God.

1. _The_ IMMANENT _attributes_. The absolute reality (REASON) must

necessarily be conceived as First, Supreme, and Sole; must be underived,

and therefore eternal; must be absolved from all necessary relation to

other being, and therefore independent; must be above all law of change,

and therefore immutable; must have incomposite unity, and therefore

indivisible; and must be the only one, for two absolutes would limit

each other, and are thus inconceivable. Finally, absolute reality must

be the fullness and archetype of all being in which every form and every

relation, every totality and every harmony, conceivable or possible,

must be ideally and eternally present.

ETERNITY (1 Tim. i. 17; vi. 15, 16; Rev. i. 4, 8; Heb. i. 8).

IMMUTABILITY (James i. 17; Psalm cii. 26, 27; Heb. i. 12).

UNITY (Isaiah xliv. 6; Eph. iv. 6; 1 Tim. ii. 5; John xvii. 3).

IDEALITY (Psalm cxxxix. 16; Rom. xi. 36; Acts xv. 18).

These are the immanent attributes of God.

2. _The_ TRANSITIVE OR RELATIVE _attributes_. The Infinite Efficiency

(SPIRIT) must necessarily be conceived as all-mighty, all-present, and

all-knowing. The Infinite Spirit fills, penetrates, moves, and vitalizes

the universe. He is in all, and through all, and transcends all. He can

not be bounded in space or limited in power, therefore He is spaceless

and infinite. "He is every where present, not virtually but

substantially, for virtue can not subsist without substance." And as the

All-mighty is present every where, present to all things, so all things

exist "in Him," and are present to Him in an immediate and intuitive

vision--He knows all things.

OMNIPOTENCE (Psalm cxv. 3; Jer. xxxii. 27; Rom. xi. 36; 1 Cor. viii. 6).

UBIQUITY (Psalm cxxxix. 7-13; Jer. xxiii. 23, 24; 1 Cor. xv. 28; Matth.

x. 29).

OMNISCIENCE (Psalm cxxxix. 1-6; Acts i. 24; Heb. iv. 13; Matth. vi. 8).

These are the relative or transitive attributes of God.

3. _The_ MORAL _attributes_. Perfect Personality (LOVE) must by the very

conception be wise and holy, righteous and blessed, for these are the

attributes of personality, and may all be ultimately grounded in love.

The reason of all existence and all personality is found, not in

infinite causality, but in the free love of the perfect personality.

This is the final cause of all existence. And if perfect Love be the

final cause of all existence, it must know the end, and ordain the law

and means. The highest end of the world is the perfect fellowship of man

with God; the physical must therefore be subordinated to the moral order

of the universe. The Perfect Personality must freely will to impart his

fellowship to those who are obedient to his moral law; and it must be

removed from fellowship with and deny itself to evil, which is

antagonistic to the ends of Love. Or, in other words, it must establish

a fixed and changeless relation between righteousness and blessedness in

the creature. It must approve the good and condemn the evil. And in

making the righteous "partakers of his joy," He must be "well pleased."

The absolute blessedness of God is found in the fullness and harmony of

the Divine life. He has in Himself the eternal and absolutely worthy

object of his love. But there is a Divine satisfaction, "a good pleasure

of God," which is found in the communication of Himself to the creature.

"He rejoiceth in the habitable parts of the earth, and his delights are

with the sons of men." "He taketh pleasure in them that fear Him, in

those that hope in his mercy."

WISDOM (Job xii. 13; Rom. xi. 33, 34; Eph. iii. 9, 10).

GOODNESS (Psalm xxxiii. 5; xxxiv. 8; cvii. 1, 8).

HOLINESS (Deut. xxxii. 4; Psalm v. 5; James i. 13, 17).

BLESSEDNESS (1 Tim. i. 11; vi. 15).

These are the moral attributes of God.[44] They are also called by

pre-eminence the Perfections of God, because they are free

determinations of the Divine nature, an everlasting "BECOMING," rather

than an eternal "BEING." The immanent attributes of God are a necessary

inbeing; the moral attributes of God are a voluntary outgoing, an

eternally free, alternative forth-putting of choice for the right and

the good.[45]

The doctrine concerning God above presented, in which we fain would

hope that philosophy and Christian thought are brought into harmony, may

now be summarily presented in the following schema:

_Fundamental Idea of Reason._ _Thought-Conceptions_

_Founded on Relations._

(Essence) {ETERNITY }

{as ABSOLUTE REALITY.... {IMMUTABILITY } Immanent

{UNITY } Attributes.

{IDEALITY }

UNCONDITIONED {OMNIPOTENCE } Transitive

WILL {as INFINITE EFFICIENCY.. {UBIQUITY } or Causal

{OMNISCIENCE } Attributes.

{WISDOM } Moral Attributes

{as PERFECT PERSONALITY {GOODNESS } (Relational).

{HOLINESS }

{BLESSEDNESS }

The references to the Sacred Scriptures already given will show the

harmony between the conceptions of reason and the verbal revelations of

God. Reason and Scripture unite in proclaiming that God is "the great

and holy _One_ that inhabiteth eternity," who "only hath immortality,"

"with whom is no variableness," and who "filleth all in all;" to whom

"all his works are known from eternity," in whose book "all our members

were written when as yet there was none of them," and whose "purposes,"

ideas, and plans are "eternal." These are mainly the immanent attributes

of God, conceptions which flow from the very idea of the Absolute and

Infinite Being. They are evolved from Real Being by the negation of all

limit, all parts, all change; the canceling of time and space and

matter, the recognition of God as pure Reason, pure Spirit, pure Love.

The Scriptures, however, deal more immediately with the causal,

transitive, and relational aspects of the Divine attributes--that is,

with the conception of God in his voluntary relations to finite being

and finite personality. They speak of God in his historically known

existence, as a Being who _voluntarily_ conditions his Omnipotence and

Sovereignty under concessions of self-reality, self-life, and freedom to

finite beings, without Himself being conditioned by any thing--a

_self-limitation_ which in nowise detracts from the absoluteness and

infinity of God--an _unconditioned conditionating Will_.[46]

The relation which God sustains to his works is not a _necessary_

relation--it is a _voluntary_ and self-imposed relation. Free Love is

the highest determining principle for the efficiency of Divine

Omnipotence. Power thus directed and conditioned by wisdom and love does

not, can not detract from the perfection of God. The substitution of

_choice_ for necessity is, in fact, no real limitation; on the contrary,

it ascribes to God the most _absolute perfection_.

The causal attributes of God, or those conceptions of God which are

especially grounded upon his relation to the world and humanity, are

properly divided into those which are Cosmical and those which are

Ethical. The first, of course, embrace his relation to the world, the

second his relation to personal, responsible beings. The content of the

cosmological conception is Omnipotence, Ubiquity, Omniscience. The

content of the ethical conception is Wisdom, Goodness, Holiness, and

Blessedness. God as the Creator and Sustainer of the world, God as the

Father, Teacher, and Ruler of humanity, are the two grand manifestations

of the one infinite and perfect Being, and "_Elohim_" and "_Jehovah_"

are his expressive and distinctive names, the first denoting the

cosmical activity of God, the latter his government and kingdom among

men.

These two grand aspects of the Divine manifestation are marked in the

Elohistic and Jehovistic portions of the first revelation given to the

Semitic race. They are still more distinctly recognized in Paul's

discourse before the assembled Athenian philosophers, where Christian

theology was for the first time presented to the Greek mind--God the

Creator and Conservator of the world (Acts xvii. 24, 25); God the

Father, Teacher, Ruler, and Judge of humanity (Acts xvii. 26-31).

The Theistic Conception of the World An Essay in Opposition to Certain Tendencies of Modern Thought · 第 2 / 12 章