CHAPTER V

_The Roman Pilgrimage: the Miracles which were wrought in it._

[Sidenote: 1139]

33. (20). It seemed to him, however, that one could not go on doing

these things with sufficient security without the authority of the

Apostolic See; and for that reason he determined to set out for Rome,

and most of all because the metropolitan see still lacked, and from the

beginning had lacked, the use of the pall, which is the fullness of

honour.[507] And it _seemed good in his eyes_[508] that the church for

which he had laboured so much[509] should acquire, by his zeal and

labour, that privilege which hitherto it had not had. There was also

another metropolitan see, which Cellach had constituted anew, though

subject to the first see and to its archbishop as primate.[510] For it

also Malachy no less desired the pall, and that the prerogative which it

had attained by the gift of Cellach should be confirmed by the authority

of the Apostolic See. When his purpose became known it displeased both

the brothers and the magnates and people of the country; because all

judged that they could not endure so long an absence of the loving

father of them all, and because they feared he might die.

[Sidenote: 1139, June 12]

[Sidenote: 1140, January]

34. It happened meanwhile that his brother, Christian by name,

died,[511] _a good man, full of grace and_ power.[512] He was a bishop

second to Malachy in reputation, but in holiness of life and zeal for

righteousness perhaps his equal. His departure made all the more afraid,

and rendered a parting from Malachy more grievous. They said, in fact,

that they would in no wise assent to the pilgrimage of their only

protector, since _the whole land_ would _be made desolate_[513] if in

one moment it was bereaved of two such _pillars_.[514] Therefore all,

with one voice, opposed him, and would have used force but that he

threatened them with divine vengeance. They refused to desist, however,

till the will of God on this matter should be asked by the casting of a

lot. He forbade it: nevertheless they cast the lot, but thrice it was

found to give an answer in favour of Malachy. For they were not content

with one trial, so eager were they to retain him. Yielding at length

they let him go, but not without _lamentation and weeping and great

mourning_.[515] But that he should leave nothing imperfect he began to

take measures by which he might _raise up the seed of his_ dead

_brother_.[516] And three of his disciples having been summoned to him

he deliberated anxiously which should seem more worthy, or, in other

words, more useful, for this work. And when he had scrutinized them one

by one, he said, "Do you, Edan" (that was the name of one of them),

"undertake the burden."[517] And when he hesitated and wept, he

proceeded, "Do not fear; for you have been designated to me by the Lord;

for just now I saw in anticipation the gold ring with which you are to

be espoused on your finger."[518] He assented, and when he had been

consecrated Malachy set out on his journey.

35. And when he had left Scotland[519] and reached York, a priest,

named Sycarus,[520] _steadfastly beholding him_[521] recognized him. For

though he had not seen his face before, because he _had the spirit of

prophecy_[522] he had received a revelation concerning him long ago. And

now without hesitation he pointed him out with his finger to those who

stood round him, saying, "_This is he of whom I had said_ that from

Ireland _there shall come_[523] a holy bishop who _knoweth the thoughts

of man_."[524] So the _lamp_ could not be hid _under a bushel_, for the

Holy Spirit who _lighted_ it[525] brought it forth by the mouth of

Sycarus. For also many secret things concerning the affairs of him and

his companions were told him by Sycarus, all of which he acknowledged to

be or to have been. But when the companions of Malachy went on to

inquire about their return, Sycarus immediately replied--and _the event

afterwards proved the truth of the saying_[526]--that evidently very few

of their number would return with the bishop. When they heard that they

imagined that he apprehended death: but God fulfilled it in another way;

for on his way back from the City he left some with us, and some in

other places, to learn the rule of life;[527] and so, _according to the

word_ of Sycarus,[528] he returned to his own country with very few

companions. So much concerning Sycarus.

36. In the same city of York he was visited by a man of noble rank

according to the standard of the world, Waltheof[529] by name, then

prior of the regular brothers at Kirkham,[530] but now a monk, and

father of the monks at Melrose, a monastery of our Order,[531] who

devoutly commended himself with humility to Malachy's prayers. And when

he noticed that the bishop had many companions and few horses--for

besides ministers[532] and other clerks he had with him five presbyters,

and only three horses--he offered him his own, on which he rode, saying

that he regretted only one thing, that it was a pack-horse[533] and a

rough animal to ride. And he added, "I would have given it more

willingly if it had been better; but, if you think it worth while, take

it with you, such as it is." "And I," replied the bishop, "accept it the

more willingly the more valueless you proclaim it, because nothing can

be of no value to me which so precious a will offers;" and, turning to

his companions, "Saddle this horse for me, for it is suitable for me,

and will suffice for a long time." This done, he mounts. And at first he

considered it rough, as it was, but afterwards, by a wonderful change,

he found that it suited him well and ambled pleasantly. And that there

might not _fall_ on _the ground_ any part of the word which he had

spoken,[534] till the ninth year, the year in which he died,[535] it did

not fail him, and became an excellent and very valuable palfrey.

And--that which made the miracle more evident to those that saw--from

being nearly black it began to grow white, and after no long time[536]

there was scarcely a whiter horse to be found than it.

[Sidenote: 1140, March]

37. (21). To me also it was granted to see the man on that journey,[537]

and by the sight of him and by his word I was refreshed, and _I

rejoiced as in all riches_;[538] and I, in turn, though a sinner, _found

grace in his sight_[539] then, and from that time up to his death, as I

said in the Preface.[540] He also, deigning to turn aside to

Clairvaux,[541] when he saw the brothers was deeply moved; and they

were not a little edified by his presence and his speech. So accepting

the place and us, and gathering us into his inmost heart, he bade us

farewell and departed. And crossing the Alps he came to Ivrea,[542] a

city of Italy, where he immediately healed the little son of his host

who _was sick and ready to die_.[543]

[Sidenote: 1140, May]

38. Pope Innocent II., of happy memory, was then in the Apostolic

See.[544] He received him courteously, and displayed kindly pity for him

on account of his long pilgrimage. And Malachy in the first place asked

with many tears for that which he had fixed most deeply in his heart,

that he might be allowed to live and die at Clairvaux, with the

permission and blessing of the chief Pontiff. He sought this, not

forgetful of the purpose for which he had come, but influenced by the

longing for Clairvaux which he had brought with him.[545] But he did not

obtain his request, because the apostolic man decided that he should be

employed to more profitable advantage. He was not, however, wholly

disappointed of _his heart's desire_,[546] since it was granted him if

not to live, at least to die there. He spent a whole month in the City,

visiting the holy places and resorting to them for prayer. During that

time the chief Pontiff made frequent and careful inquiry of him and

those who were with him concerning the affairs of their country, the

morals of the people, the state of the churches, and the great things

that God had wrought by him in the land. And when he was already

preparing to return home the Pope committed his own authority to him,

appointing him legate throughout the whole of Ireland. For Bishop

Gilbert, who, as we have mentioned above, was then legate, had intimated

to him that by reason of age and infirmity of body _he could no longer

discharge the duties of the office_.[547] After this Malachy prayed that

the constitution of the new metropolis[548] should be confirmed, and

that palls should be given him for both sees. The privilege of

confirmation he soon received; "but regarding the palls," said the chief

Pontiff, "more formal action must be taken. You must call together the

bishops and clerks and the magnates of the land and hold a general

council; and so with the assent and common desire of all ye shall demand

the pall by persons of honest repute, and it shall be given you." Then

he took his mitre from his own head, and placed it on Malachy's

head,[549] and more, he gave him the stole and maniple which he was

accustomed to use in the offering; and saluting him with the kiss of

peace he dismissed him, strengthened with the apostolic blessing and

authority.

[Sidenote: 1140, July-August]

[Sidenote: 1142]

39. And returning by Clairvaux he bestowed on us _a second_

benediction.[550] And sighing deeply that it was not allowed him to

remain as he longed to do, he said, "Meanwhile I pray you to keep these

men for me, that they may learn from you what they may afterwards teach

us." And he added, "They will be to us for a seed, _and in_ this _seed

shall the nations be blessed_,[551] even those nations which from

ancient days have heard the name of monk, but have not seen a

monk."[552] And leaving four of his most intimate companions[553] he

departed: and they, when they were proved and found worthy, were made

monks. After a time, when the saint was now in his own country, he sent

others,[554] and they were dealt with in like manner. And when they had

been instructed for some time _and had applied their hearts unto

wisdom_,[555] the holy brother Christian,[556] who was one of

themselves, was given to them to be their father, and we sent them out,

adding from our own a sufficient number for an abbey.[557] And this

abbey _conceived and bare_ five _daughters_,[558] and the seed being

thus multiplied[559] the number of monks increases from day to day

according to the desire and prophecy of Malachy. Now let us return to

the order of the narrative.

40. (22). Malachy having set out from us had a prosperous journey

through Scotland. And he found King David,[560] who is still alive

to-day, in one of his castles;[561] and his son _was sick nigh unto

death_.[562] And when Malachy entered the king's house he was honourably

received by him and prevailed upon by humble entreaty _that he would

heal his son_.[563] He sprinkled the youth with water which he had

blessed, and _fastening his eyes upon him_ said,[564] "Trust me, my son;

you shall not die this time." He said this, and on the next day,

according to his word, there followed the cure, and after the cure the

joy of the father and the shouting and noise of the whole exulting

family. The _rumour went forth_[565] to all, for what happened in the

royal house and to the king's son _could not be hid_.[566] And lo,

everywhere there resounded _thanksgiving and the voice of praise_,[567]

both for the salvation of their lord, and for the novelty of the

miracle. This is Henry;[568] for he still lives, the only son of his

father, a brave and prudent knight, taking after his father as they say,

in _following after righteousness_[569] and love of the truth. And both

loved Malachy, as long as he lived, because he had recalled him from

death. They asked him to remain some days; but he, shunning renown, was

impatient of delay, and in the morning went on his way.

As he passed, therefore, through the village called Cruggleton,[570] a

dumb girl met him. While he prayed _the string of her tongue was loosed

and she spake plain_.[571]

Then he entered the village which they call St. Michael's Church,[572]

and before all the people cured a woman who was brought to him, mad and

bound with cords; and when he had sent her away restored he went on.

But when he came to Portus Lapasperi,[573] he waited there for a passage

some days; but the time of delay did not pass idly. In the interval an

oratory is constructed of twigs woven into a hedge, he both giving

directions and himself working. When it was finished he surrounded it

with a wall, and blessed the enclosed space for a cemetery. The merits

of him who blessed, the miracles, which are said to be wrought there

frequently to this day, sufficiently declare.

41. Hence it came that they were in the habit of carrying thither from

the neighbouring places those _that were_ infirm and _diseased_, and

_many_ were healed.[574] A woman paralysed in all her limbs, brought

thither on a waggon, returned home on foot, having waited only one night

in the holy place, not in vain, for the mercy of the Lord.[575]

* * * * *

Let these incidents--a few out of many--suffice with reference to that

place; for now we must proceed with what remains.

FOOTNOTES:

[507] The pall is a sort of collar, made of lamb's wool, which every

metropolitan is required to obtain from the Pope, and without which he

cannot exercise his functions. From the end of the eleventh century it

has been described in papal bulls as the symbol of "the fullness of

the pontifical office" (_Catholic Encyclopedia_, xi. 428). For the

date of Malachy's decision to go to Rome, see p. 72, n. 3.

[508] 1 Sam. xiv. 36, 40 (vg.).

[509] Armagh.

[510] Cashel, the seat of the kings of Munster. It was certainly the

see of an archbishop in 1110, when Malchus subscribed the Acts of

Rathbreasail as archbishop of Cashel. For the date of its foundation

see p. xxxv. f.

[511] Christian, bishop of Clogher, was probably appointed bishop of

that diocese in succession to Cinaeth Ua Baigill, who died in 1135

(_A.T._). He seems to have transferred the see of the diocese to

Louth, a large part of the diocese of Armagh (in which Louth was

situated) being placed under his jurisdiction. This arrangement was no

doubt made by Malachy with the support of Donough O'Carroll. See the

document quoted in Additional Note C, p. 170, _L.A.J._ iv. 133 ff. and

above, p. lix. Christian is commemorated in the contemporary

Martyrology of Gorman on June 12. The year of his death is stated

(_A.F.M._) to have been 1138. St. Bernard obviously supposed it to

have taken place in 1139 (p. 70, n. 2), and he appears to be right.

For the work described in § 32 demands a longer period than can be

allowed for it on the supposition that he divulged his scheme of

visiting Rome before June 12, 1138. Moreover by that time he cannot

have known that the papal schism had come to an end; for the Anti-pope

did not submit till May 29. Cp. p. 72, n. 3, and _R.I.A._ xxxv. 245

ff. For another notice of Christian, see p. 89, n. 1.

[512] Acts vi. 8 (vg.), combined with Acts xi. 24.

[513] Jer. xii. 11.

[514] Gal. ii. 9.

[515] Matt. ii. 18.

[516] Deut. xxv. 5 (vg.).

[517] Edan O'Kelly was bishop of Louth till his death in 1182

(_A.L.C._). He organized the diocese of Oriel, with its see at

Louth--corresponding to the present diocese of Clogher--by the help of

Donough O'Carroll. In conjunction with him he founded the monastery of

SS. Peter and Paul for Augustinian canons at Knock, by Louth,

consecrated by Malachy in 1148 (_A.F.M._; _L.A.J._ iv. 239, and

document quoted, p. 170). Close to it he also founded the Augustinian

monastery of St. Mary, the church of which was the cathedral church of

the diocese. On the early history of this diocese see _L.A.J._ iv. 129

ff.

[518] This simple story was much developed in later times. Thus in a

medieval register of Clogher we read that when Edan had anointed

Christian on his deathbed "Malachy saw the ring which Christian wore

leap to Edan's finger, and therefore he consecrated him bishop"

(_L.A.J._ iv. 239).

[519] No particulars are given of the passage through Scotland. But

Malachy probably sailed from Bangor to Cairngarroch (§ 40, p. 78, n.

4), and travelled thence by the shortest route through Carlisle to

York. The kingdom of Scotland then extended southwards to the river

Ribble at Gisburn (§ 69) and eastwards to the Tees (William of

Newburgh, in _Chron. of Stephen_ (R.S.), i. 70). For a full discussion

of his journeys, the results of which are here assumed, see _R.I.A._

xxxv. 238-243.

[520] This probably represents the Saxon name Sighere. Jocelin, who

tells this story (_Vita S. Waltheni_ in _AA.SS._, Aug., i. 255), says

that Sycarus (or as the MSS. of his tract call him, Figarus) was a

priest _de Neubato_ (v.l. _Neuvelt_). _i.e._, I suppose, of Newbald, a

parish near Market Weighton, and about twenty-three miles from York.

[521] Acts xiv. 9.

[522] Rev. xix. 10.

[523] John i. 30.

[524] Ps. xciv. 11.

[525] Matt. v. 15; Mark iv. 21; Luke xi. 33.

[526] Gen. xli. 13 (vg.).

[527] Cp. § 39.

[528] 2 Kings vi. 18, etc.

[529] Printed text, _Wallenus_, obviously an error for _Walleuus_

(_Wallevus_), which is the reading of A. The name occurs also in the

form Waldeve. St. Waltheof was the younger son of Simon de St. Liz,

earl of Northampton, by his wife Matilda, daughter of Waltheof, earl

of Northumberland. After Simon's death Matilda married David,

afterwards (1124) king of Scots. That Waltheof was the stepson of

David I. is a fact not unimportant for readers of the _Life of St.

Malachy_. After living for some time in Scotland Waltheof retired to

the Augustinian priory of St. Oswald, Nostal. Subsequently, but at

what date seems to be unknown, he was appointed prior of Kirkham. But,

desirous of a more austere life, he resigned the priory, and entered a

Cistercian house at Wardon, Bedfordshire. From it he soon migrated to

Rievaulx in Yorkshire, and took the vows of the Order. On the

deposition of Richard, first abbot of Melrose, he was elected as his

successor in 1148. He died August 3, 1159. (Life by Jocelin in

_AA.SS._, Aug, i. 248). His visit to Malachy proves that the fame of

the latter had come to his ears--probably through the Scots who knew

him at Lismore (§ 8). It indicates also that Malachy stayed at York

long enough to allow the news of his arrival to be sent to Kirkham.

[530] The ruins of Kirkham Abbey remain in the parish of Weston, about

sixteen miles north-east of York. This house of Augustinian canons was

founded in 1121 by Walter Espec and his wife Adeline. The first prior

was William, rector of Garton, uncle of Espec. Dugdale (vol. vi. 1.

pp. 207-209), overlooking Waltheof, mentions no other before 1190.

[531] The first Cistercian monastery in Scotland, founded in 1136 by

David I. It was a daughter of Rievaulx, from which, as we have seen,

Waltheof was called to be its abbot. Its church of St. Mary was

consecrated July 28, 1146. It is on the bank of the Tweed, not far

from Old Melrose, the site of a community founded in the seventh

century, of which St. Cuthbert was a member. See James A. Wade,

_History of Melrose_.

[532] Deacons.

[533] _Runcinus_, the Old English _rouncy_ (Chaucer, _Prol._ 390).

From this incident the inference is clear that during the whole

journey to Rome and back most of Malachy's companions were always on

foot, and that the party went at a walking pace.

[534] 1 Sam. iii. 19. Cp. Matt. x. 29.

[535] An important date. Since Malachy died on November 2, 1148, he

must have reached York not earlier than November 1139. For reasons for

putting the visit somewhat later see _R.I.A._, xxxv. 247 f.

[536] "Within a few days," says Jocelin in his version of the story!

See _AA.SS._ l.c.

[537] After leaving York Malachy no doubt followed approximately the

line of the Roman road known as Erming Street to London and

Canterbury. Thanks to the preservation of the Itinerary of Archbishop

Sigeric on his journey from Rome to Canterbury in 990 (Stubbs,

_Memorials of St. Dunstan_ (R.S.), pp. 391-395), to our knowledge of

the routes of travellers contemporary with Malachy, and to the rare

mention in the _Life_ of places through which he passed, we can follow

him almost step by step from Canterbury to Rome and back. He probably

sailed from Dover, and landed on the French coast at or near Wissant.

Thence he went by Arras, Rheims, Châlons-sur-Marne, Bar-sur-Aube,

Lausanne, Martigny, and over the Great St. Bernard to Ivrea. Then he

followed the beaten tract through Vercelli, Pavia, Piacenza,

Pontremoli, Lucca and Viterbo to Rome. On the whole journey, from

Bangor to Rome and back, the company traversed about 3000 miles on

land, besides crossing the sea four times. Allowing for stoppages at

Rome, Clairvaux and elsewhere, and for a weekly rest on Sunday,

Malachy must have been absent from Ireland about nine months. For

details see _R.I.A._ xxxv. 238 ff. The marginal dates are based on

that investigation, and are to be regarded merely as approximations.

[538] Ps. cxix. 14.

[539] Gen. xxxiii. 10, etc.

[540] Pref. § 2.

[541] Malachy probably "turned aside" from the main road at

Bar-sur-Aube, from which Clairvaux is distant eight miles. A few words

may be said about this famous monastery and its first abbot. Bernard,

the son of a nobleman named Tescelin and his saintly wife Aleth, whose

memory exercised a powerful influence on the lives of her children,

was born at Fontaines, a mile or two from Dijon, in 1090. In Oct. 1111

he persuaded his brothers and many of his friends to embrace the

religious life. Early in the following year the whole band, thirty in

number, entered the austere and now declining community which had been

established in 1098 at Citeaux, twelve miles from Dijon. Their arrival

was the beginning of the prosperity of the great Cistercian Order. In

1115 Bernard was sent out, with some brothers, by the abbot, Stephen

Harding, to found a daughter house on the river Aube, in a valley

which had once been known, from its desolation, as the Valley of

Wormwood. After incredible hardships a monastery was built, and the

place was so transformed by the labours of the monks that henceforth

it deserved its newer name of Clara Vallis, or Clairvaux. The

community rapidly increased in numbers; and in 1133, in spite of the

opposition of the abbot when the proposal was first made, the building

of a large monastery on a different site was begun. It was probably

far advanced when Malachy arrived in 1140 (Vacandard, i. 413, 423). It

was just completed when he came again in 1148 (see p. 143, n. 5). St.

Bernard died on August 20, 1153. At this time he was the most powerful

ecclesiastic in Europe, not excepting his nominee Pope Innocent II.

(see p. 72, n. 3). Doubtless the main purpose of Malachy's visit to

Clairvaux was to secure St. Bernard's support of the petition which he

was about to present to the Pope. For further information about St.

Bernard the reader may consult _V.P._, Vacandard, J. Cotter Morison,

_The Life and Times of St. Bernard, Abbot of Clairvaux_ (1868), and

Richard S. Storrs, _Bernard of Clairvaux, the Times, the Man, and his

Work_ (1892).

[542] _Yporia._ Its ancient name was Eporedia. From it there are two

routes across the Alps, by the Great St. Bernard and the Little St.

Bernard respectively.

[543] Luke vii. 2.

[544] On the death of Pope Honorius II. (February 14, 1130) two Popes

were elected by different groups of cardinals, Innocent II. and

Anacletus II. St. Bernard espoused the cause of the former, and by his

untiring efforts almost all the sovereigns of Europe were enlisted on

his side (see Vacandard, chaps. x.-xiii., xviii.; Storrs, pp. 523-540;

Morison, pp. 149-165, 209-213). But the schism lasted for eight years.

At length Anacletus died (January 7, 1138), and the surrender of his

successor, Victor IV., on May 29, 1138 (_Ep._ 317), left Innocent in

undisputed occupation of the papal chair. The news of the pacification

was not announced in Scotland till the end of September (Richard of

Hexham, 170). It probably reached Ireland a little later. It must have

been after he was assured of the end of the schism that Malachy

proposed his journey to Rome, _i.e._ at the end of 1138 or in 1139.

[545] _Quo uenerat._

[546] Ps. xxi. 2.

[547] Luke xvi. 2 (vg.).--For Gilbert see p. 47, n. 3. Patrick,

successor of Gilbert in the see of Limerick, was consecrated by

Theobald, archbishop of Canterbury, who was himself consecrated on

January 8, 1139 (W. Stubbs, _Reg. Sac. Angl._, p. 45). His profession

of obedience (Ussher, p. 565) appears in the roll of professions at

Canterbury immediately before that of Uhtred of Llandaff, who was

consecrated in 1140 (Stubbs, _l.c._). If we assume that Gilbert

resigned his see and his legatine commission at the same time, this

gives 1139-40 as the date of Malachy's journey, in agreement with the

hint of St. Bernard in § 36. It is possible that Gilbert's resignation

of his office as legate was sent to Rome by Malachy.

[548] Cashel. See p. 65, note 4.

[549] Fleming in 1623 saw a mitre of Malachy at Clairvaux, which was

supposed to have been the one placed on his head by Innocent at

Orbiers, ten leagues away, his wooden drinking cup was preserved: it

was in a leathern case, adorned with Irish interlacings (_Irish

Ecclesiastical Record_, vii. 63).

[550] Cp. 2 Cor. i. 15.

[551] Gen. xxii. 18; xxvi. 4.

[552] Compare the passage concerning a brother who had been sent from

Clairvaux to Sweden in 1143, and had founded a daughter monastery

there: "The lord [St. Bernard] sent to his faithful servant learned

and discreet persons from the parts of Germany and England, by whom

the discipline of monastic religion founded in that kingdom increased

and bore worthy fruit among peoples who had indeed heard the name of

monk, but had never before seen a monk" (_V.P._ vii. 54). It was

literally true that no monastic communities had previously existed in

Sweden (C. H. Robinson, _Conversion of Europe_, p. 482 f. Cp.

Vacandard, ii. 416). But the passage before us cannot be construed as

an assertion that Ireland was in like case; for in § 12 mention is

made of the "monks" of Bangor in the time of Congall. St. Bernard (or

Malachy, if the words are really his) must be taken to mean simply

that the so-called monks of the decadent contemporary Church of

Ireland were not monks in the true sense of the word. (Cp. Lett. iii.

§ 2). There is nothing to be said for the explanation suggested by

Lanigan (iv. 114) that the "nations" are nations other than the Irish,

who had no monks. For where were those nations to whom the Irish might

send colonies of monks? The fact is that the Latin word for "nations"

(_gentes_) may quite well mean here what it certainly means in § 42,

the Irish tribes.

[553] He left others in other Cistercian houses (§ 35).

[554] Cp. Letter i. § 1.

[555] Ps. xc. 12.

[556] Gilla Críst Ua Condoirche was probably a native of the district

of Bangor (§ 14). He seems to have been one of the four who were left

by Malachy at Clairvaux; and, as is here stated, he was the first

abbot of Mellifont. He seems, however, to have proved not well suited

for the office, for he was sent back to Clairvaux for further

instruction (Letter iii. § 3). Some of the Clairvaux brothers (if not

all of them) refused to remain in Ireland, and it is perhaps hinted

that the cause of their return was dissatisfaction with his

administration (_ib._ § 2). About 1150 he was promoted to the

bishopric of Lismore, and at the Synod of Kells in 1152 he appeared as

papal legate (Keating, iii. 317). He was present at the consecration

of the church of Mellifont Abbey in 1157 (_A.U._) As legate he also

presided at the Synod of Cashel in 1172 (Giraldus, _Expug._ i. 34). He

died in 1186 (_A.L.C._). Felix, bishop of Lismore, attended the

Lateran Council of 1179 (Mansi, xxii. 217). Christian must therefore

have resigned his see before that date.

[557] Mellifont Abbey, the ruins of which still remain in a secluded

valley, beside the stream known as the Mattock, about two miles from

the Boyne, and five miles west of Drogheda. Some time after Malachy

returned to Ireland he wrote to St. Bernard, asking him to send two of

the four brothers who had been left at Clairvaux to select a site for

the abbey. This request was declined (Lett. i. § 1), and the

site--doubtless the gift of Donough O'Carroll (see the document quoted

p. 170)--was apparently chosen by Malachy himself. In 1142 (_C.M.A._

ii. 262, _Clyn's Annals_, _Annals of Boyle_), the four brothers,

together with a contingent of monks from Clairvaux, arrived, and the

monastery was founded, with Christian as its first abbot (Lett. ii.).

Considerable progress was made with the buildings, and endowments

poured in. But after a while it became necessary to send Christian

back to France for further instruction, and the Clairvaux monks went

with him, never to return. In due time Christian resumed his office as

abbot, and with him came one Robert, to assist him in the work of

building and organization (Lett. iii). The Abbey Church was not

consecrated till 1157, nine years after Malachy's death (_A.U._).

Mellifont remained the principal Cistercian house in Ireland up to the

Reformation. After the dissolution (1539) it was granted, with its

possessions, to Sir Edward Moore, ancestor of the earls of Drogheda.

The only portions of the monastery which remain in a fair state of

preservation are the Chapter House and the Lavabo. The latter belongs

to the original building. Excavations made about twenty years ago

revealed the ground plan of the entire monastery, most of which was of

later date than Malachy. Traces were discovered of the foundation of

the eastern portion of the original church, about forty feet west of

the east wall of the structure which later took its place. It had six

chapels at the east end, four of which were apsidal (_71st Report of

Commissioners of Public Works, Ireland_, p. 11).

[558] 1 Sam. ii. 21.--The five daughters were apparently Bective (de

Beatitudine) founded in 1147, Boyle, 1147-8, Monasternenagh, 1148,

Baltinglas (de Valle Salutis), 1148, and Inislounaght (Janauschek,

_Origines Cistercienses_, Vindoboniæ, 1877, pp. 70, 92, 113). The

last-named seems to have been in existence in 1148 (see § 64), and it

may have been an off-shoot of Mellifont, though at an early date it

was subject to Monasternenagh (_ibid._ 131). Gougaud (_Les Chrétientés

Celtiques_, 1911, p. 364) gives Shrule (de Benedictione Dei) the fifth

place; but it appears to have been founded (1150?) after the _Life_

was written (Janauschek, p. 114).

[559] Cp. Gen. xxii. 17; xxvi. 4.

[560] David I. of Scotland, son of Malcolm Canmore and St. Margaret,

the sister of Edgar the Atheling. He was born in 1084. His sister

Matilda was the wife of Henry I. of England; and thus he was uncle of

Matilda, the empress, for whom he fought against Stephen, though

Stephen's wife, Queen Matilda, was also his niece. In 1113 David

married Matilda, the widow of Simon de St. Liz, earl of Northampton

(cp. p. 69, n. 1). He succeeded Alexander I. in 1124 and died in 1153.

As the founder of several Scottish dioceses and as having introduced

the Cistercian Order into his kingdom he had much in common with St.

Malachy.

[561] This is probably an error. There is no record that David I. had

any castles in Galloway; and the chronicles seem to show that at this

period his principal residences were at Roxburgh and Carlisle. The

narrative suggests that the castle referred to was in the immediate

neighbourhood of Cruggleton (p. 78, n. 1), and it was probably the

predecessor of that of which the scanty ruins--believed to be of

thirteenth-century date--remain on the coast not far from the village.

They are on a peninsula of such natural strength that we may suppose

it was in very early times the site of a fortress (_Fourth Report of

Commission on Ancient Monuments in Scotland_, vol. i. p. 144).

Possibly, as has been suggested, David was there as the guest of

Fergus, lord of Galloway (1124-1161), to whom, subsequently to the

Battle of the Standard (August 22, 1138), and probably not long before

this visit of Malachy, he had been reconciled after a long

estrangement (Agnew, _Hereditary Sheriffs of Galloway_, 1893. vol. i.

p. 58).

[562] Phil. ii. 27 (inexact quotation).

[563] 2 John iv. 47.

[564] Acts iii. 4.

[565] Luke vii. 17.

[566] Mark vii. 24.

[567] Isa. li. 3 (vg.).

[568] The only son of David: "a man gentle and pious, a man of sweet

nature and of pure heart, and worthy in all things to be born of such

a father" (Ailred of Rievaulx, in A. O. Anderson, _Scottish Annals

from English Chroniclers_, p. 156). He died before his father, in May

or June 1152 (John of Hexham). Two of his sons became kings of Scots,

Malcolm IV. and William I.

[569] Rom. ix. 30, etc.

[570] _Crugeldum._ Cruggleton is on the west coast of Wigtown Bay, in

the parish of Sorby, Wigtownshire. In passing through this village

Malachy made a détour, probably in order to visit King David, which

considerably lengthened his journey.

[571] Mark vii. 35.

[572] The parish church of Mochrum, Wigtownshire, as Sir Herbert

Maxwell informs me, was anciently dedicated to St. Michael. Thus the

village called St. Michael's Church is undoubtedly Kirk Mochrum, which

clusters round the church, and through which every traveller from

Cruggleton to Cairngarroch (see next note) must pass. It is twelve

miles from Cruggleton.

[573] _Lapasperi_ is obviously the gen. of _Lapasper_, a corruption of

_Lapis asper_ (rough stone). This seems to be a Latin rendering of

Cairngarroch (= _Carn garbh_), a name which occurs three times on the

shores of Wigtownshire. One of the places so called, on the west coast

of Luce Bay, may be set aside. The other two are seven or eight miles

apart, within sight of the Bangor coast, and nearly equidistant from

it; one in the parish of Stoneykirk, the other (now known as Rough

Cairn) in the parish of Geswalt. The late Sir Andrew Agnew (_op. cit._

p. 59) regarded the latter as the place referred to in the text on

grounds which do not seem conclusive. Cairngarroch in Stoneykirk is to

be preferred for two reasons: it is more easily approached from inland

than its rival; and it has impressed its name on the actual

coast-line, which the other has not done; "Cairngarroch Bay" is

equivalent to _Port Cairn garbh_, and that to the _Portus Lapasperi_

of the text. This identification was first proposed by O'Hanlon (p.

81); and its probability is increased now that the position of St.

Michael's Church has been fixed (see preceding note). But one of his

arguments in favour of it, based on the name of the parish, is

fallacious; for "Stoneykirk" has nothing to do with stones: it is a

late corruption of Steiniekirk = St. Stephen's Church.

[574] Mark i. 32, 34.

[575] For the passage here omitted see Appendix, p. 171.

St. Bernard of Clairvaux's Life of St. Malachy of Armagh · 第 5 / 9 章