So he goes off in search of destiny. He travels a very long time, and

at last she is pointed out to him. She lives in an enormous and

luxurious palace; but her wealth is dwindling day by day, and the doors

and windows of her abode are shrinking. She explains to him that she

passes thus, alternately, from misery to opulence; and that her

situation at a given moment determines the future of all the children

who may come into the world at that moment. "You were born," she says,

"when my prosperity was on the wane; and that is the cause of your

ill-luck." The only way, she tells him, to hoodwink or get the better

of fortune would be to substitute the luck of Militza, his niece, for

his own, seeing that she was born at a propitious period. All he need

do, she says, is to take this niece into his house, and to declare to

any one who may ask him that all he has belongs to Militza.

He does as she bids him, and his affairs at once take a new turn. His

herds multiply and grow fat, his trees are bent beneath the masses of

fruit, unexpected inheritances come in, his land bears prodigious

crops. But one morning, as he stands there, his heart filled with

happiness, eyeing a magnificent cornfield, a stranger asks him who the

owner may be of these wonderful ears of wheat that, as they sway to and

fro beneath the dew, seem twice as heavy and twice as high as the ears

in the adjoining field. He forgets himself, and answers, "They are

mine." At that very instant fire breaks out in the opposite end of the

field, and commences its ravages. Then he remembers the advice that he

has neglected to follow: he runs after the stranger shouting, "Stop,

come back: I made a mistake: what I told you was not true! This field

is not mine: it belongs to my niece Militza!" And the flames have no

sooner heard than they suddenly fall away, and the corn shoots up

afresh.

2

This naive and very ancient image, which might almost serve to-day as

an illustration of our actual ignorance, proves that the mysterious

problem of chance has not changed, from the time of man's first

questioning glance. We have our thoughts, which build up our intimate

happiness or sorrow; and upon this events from without have more or

less influence. In some men these thoughts will have acquired such

strength, such vigilance, that without their consent nothing can enter

the structure of crystal and brass, they have been able to raise on the

hill that commands the wonted road of adventures. And we have our

will, which our thoughts feed and sustain; and many useless or harmful

events can be held in check by our will. But around these islets,

within which is a certain degree of safety, of immunity from attack,

extends a region as vast and uncontrollable as the ocean, a region

swayed by chance as the waves are swayed by the wind. Neither will nor

thought can keep one of these waves from suddenly breaking upon us; and

we shall be caught unawares, and perhaps be wounded and stunned. Only

when the wave has retreated can thought and will begin their beneficent

action. Then they will raise us, and bind up our wounds; restore

animation, and take careful heed that the mischief the shock has

wrought shall not reach the profound sources of life. Their mission

extends no further, and may, on the surface, appear very humble. In

reality, however, unless chance assume the irresistible form of cruel

disease or death, the workings of will and thought are sufficient to

neutralise all its efforts, and to preserve what is best and most

essential to man in human happiness.

3

Redoubtable, multitudinous chance is for ever threading its watchful

way through the midst of the events we have foreseen, and round and

about our most deliberate actions, wherewith we are slowly tracing the

broad lines of our existence. The air we breathe, the time we

traverse, the space through which we move, are all peopled by lurking

circumstances, which pick us out from among the crowd. The least study

of their habits will quickly convince us that these strange daughters

of hazard, who should be blind and deaf as their father, by no means

act in his irresponsible fashion. They are well aware of what they are

doing, and rarely make a mistake. With inexplicable certainty do they

move to the passer-by whom they have been sent to confront, and lightly

touch his shoulder. Two men may be travelling upon the same road, and

at the same hour; but there will be no hesitation or doubt in the ranks

of the double, invisible troop whom fortune has ambushed there.

Towards one a band of white virgins will hasten, bearing palms and

amphorae, presenting the thousand unexpected delights of the journey;

as the other approaches, the "Evil Women," whom Aeschylus tells of,

will hurl themselves from the hedges, as though they were charged to

avenge, upon this unwitting victim, some inexpiable crime committed by

him before he was born.

4

There is scarcely one of us who has not been able, in some measure, to

follow the workings of destiny in life. We have all known men who met

with a prosperity or disaster entirely out of relation to any of their

actions; men upon whom good or bad luck seemed suddenly, at a turn of

the road, to spring from the ground or descend from the stars,

undeserved, unprovoked, but complete and inevitable. One, we will say,

who scarcely has given a thought to some appointment for which he knows

his rival to be better equipped, will see this rival vanish at the

decisive moment, another, who has counted upon the protection of a most

influential friend, will see this friend die on the very day when his

assistance could be of value. A third, who has neither talent nor

beauty, will arrive each morning at the Palace of Fortune, Glory or

Love at the brief instant when every door lies open; while another, a

man of great merit, who long has pondered the legitimate step he is

taking, presents himself at the hour when ill-luck shall have closed

the gate for the next half-century. One man will risk his health

twenty times in imbecile feats, and never experience the least

ill-effect; another will deliberately venture it in an honourable

cause, and lose it without hope of return. To help the first,

thousands of unknown people, who never have seen him, will be obscurely

working; to hinder the second, thousands of unknown people labour, who

are ignorant of his existence. And all, on the one side as well as the

other, are totally unaware of what they are doing; they obey the same

minute, widely-distributed order; and at the prescribed moment the

detached pieces of the mysterious machine join, dovetail, unite; and we

have two complete and dissimilar destinies set into motion by Time.

In a curious book on "Chance and Destiny," Dr. Foissac gives various

strange examples of the persistent, inexplicable, fundamental,

pre-ordained, irreducible iniquity in which many existences are

steeped. As we go through page after page, we feel almost as though we

were being conducted through the disconcerting laboratories of another

world where, in the absence of every instrument that human justice and

reason might hold indispensable, happiness and sorrow are being

parcelled out and allotted. Take, for instance, the life of

Vauvenargues, one of the most admirable of men, and certainly, of all

the great sages, the most unfortunate. Whenever his fortune hangs in

the balance, he is attacked and prostrated by cruel disease; and

notwithstanding the efforts of his genius, his bravery, his moral

beauty, day after day he is wantonly betrayed or falls victim to

gratuitous injustice; and at the age of thirty-two he dies, at the very

moment when recognition is at last awaiting his work. So too there is

the terrible story of Lesurques,[1] in which we see a thousand

coincidences that might have been contrived in hell, blending and

joining together to work the ruin of an innocent man; while truth,

chained down by fate, dumbly shrieking, as we do when wrestling with

nightmare, is unable to put forth a single gesture that shall rend the

veil of night. There is Aimar de Ransonnet, President of the

Parliament of Paris, one of the most upright of men, who first of all

is suddenly dismissed from his office, sees his daughter die on a

dunghill before his eyes, his son perish at the hands of the

executioner, and his wife struck by lightning; while he himself is

accused of heresy and sent to the Bastille, where he dies of grief

before he is brought to trial.

The calamities that befell Oedipus and the Atrides are regarded by us

as improbable and fabulous; and yet we find in contemporary history

that fatality clings with no less persistence to families such as the

Stuarts, the Colignys,[2] &c., and hounds to their death, with what

almost seems personal vindictiveness, pitiable and innocent victims

like Henrietta of England, daughter of Henry IV., Louise de Bourbon,

Joseph II., and Marie-Antoinette.

And again in another category, what shall we say of the

injustice--unintelligent but apparently almost conscious, almost

systematic and premeditated--of games of chance, duels, battles,

storms, shipwrecks, and fires? Or of the inconceivable luck of a

Chastenet de Puységur who, after forty years' service, in the course of

which he took part in thirty battles and a hundred and twenty sieges,

always in the front rank and displaying the most romantic courage, was

never once touched by shot or steel, while Marshal Oudinot was wounded

thirty-five times, and General Trézel was struck by a bullet in every

encounter? What shall we say of the extraordinary fortune of Lauzun,

Chamillart, Casanova, Chesterfield, &c., or of the inconceivable,

unvarying prosperity that attended the crimes of Sylla, Marius, or

Dionysius the Elder, who, in his extreme old age, after an odious but

fantastically successful life, died of joy on learning that the

Athenians had just crowned one of his tragedies? Or, finally, of

Herod, surnamed the Great or the Ascalonite, who swam in blood,

murdered one of his wives and five of his children, put to death every

upright man who might chance to offend him, and yet was fortunate in

all his undertakings?

6

These famous examples, which might be indefinitely multiplied, are in

truth no more than the abnormal and historic presentments of what is

shown to us every day, in a humbler but not less emphatic fashion, by

the thousand and one caprices of propitious or contrary fortune at work

on the small and ill-lit stage of ordinary life.

Doubtless, we must, first of all, when closely examining such insolent

prosperity or unvarying disaster, attribute a royal share to the

physical or moral causes which are capable of explaining them. Had we

ourselves known Vauvenargues, we should probably have detected a

certain timidity, irresolution or misplaced pride in his character

whereby he was disabled from allowing the opportunity to mature or from

seizing it with sufficient vigour. And Lesurques, it may be, was

deficient in ability, in one knows not what, in that prodigious

personal force that one expects to find in falsely-accused innocence.

Nor can it be denied that the Stuarts, no less than Joseph II. and

Marie-Antoinette, were guilty of enormous blunders that invited

disaster; or that Lauzun, Casanova, and Lord Chesterfield had flung to

the winds those essential scruples that hinder the honest man. So too

is it certain that although the existence of Sylla, Marius, Dionysius

the Elder, and Herod the Ascalonite may have been externally almost

incomparably fortunate, few men, I fancy, would care to have lurking

within them the strange, restless, blood-stained phantom, possessed

neither of thought nor of feeling, on which the happiness must depend

(if the word happiness be indeed applicable here) that is founded upon

unceasing crime. But, this deduction being made, and on the most

reasonable, most liberal scale (which will become the more generous as

we see more of life and understand it better, and penetrate further

into the secrets of little causes and great effects), we shall still be

forced to admit that there remains, in these obstinately recurring

coincidences, in these indissoluble series of good or evil fortune,

these persistent runs of good or bad luck, a considerable, often

essential, and sometimes exclusive share that can be ascribed only to

the impenetrable, incontrovertible will of a real but unknown power;

which is known as Chance, Fatality, Destiny, Luck, Fortune, good or

evil Star, Angel with the White Wings, Angel with the Black Wings, and

by many other names, that vary in accordance with the more or less

imaginative, more or less poetic genius of centuries and peoples. And

here we have one of the most serious, most perplexing problems of all

those that have to be solved by man before he may legitimately regard

himself as the principal, independent and irrevocable inhabitant of

this earth.

7

Let us reduce the problem to its simplest terms, and submit it to our

reason. First, however, let us consider whether it affects man alone.

We have with us, upon this curiously incomprehensible globe, silent and

faithful companions of our existence; and we shall often find it

helpful to let our eyes rest upon these when, having reached certain

altitudes that perhaps are illusory, giddiness seizes our brain and

inclines us too readily to the idea that the stars, the gods or the

veiled representatives of the sublime laws of the universe, are

concerned solely with us. These poor brothers of our animal life, that

are so calmly, so confidently resigned, would appear to know many

things that we have forgotten; they are the tranquil custodians of the

secret that we seek so anxiously. It is evident that animals, and

notably domestic animals, have also a kind of destiny. They too know

what prolonged and gratuitous happiness means; they also have

encountered the persistent misfortune for which no cause can be found.

They have the same right as we to speak of their star, their good or

bad luck, their prosperity or disaster. Compare the fate of the

cab-horse, that ends its days at the knacker's, after having passed

through the hands of a hundred brutal and nameless masters, with that

of the thorough-bred which dies of old age in the stable of a

kind-hearted master; and from the point of view of justice (unless we

accept the Buddhist theory, that life in this world is the reward or

punishment of an anterior existence) explanation is as completely

lacking as in the case of the man whom chance has reduced to poverty or

raised to wealth. There is, in Flanders, a breed of draught-dogs upon

which destiny alternately lavishes her favour and her spite. Some will

be bought by a butcher, and lead a magnificent life. The work is

trifling: in the morning, harnessed four abreast, they draw a light

cart to the slaughter-house, and at night, galloping joyously,

triumphantly, home through the narrow streets of the ancient towns with

their tiny, lit-up gables, bring it back, overflowing with meat.

Between-times there is leisure, and marvellous leisure, among the rats

and the waste of the slaughter-house. They are copiously fed, they are

fat, they shine like seals, and taste in its fulness the only happiness

dreamed of by the simple and ferreting instinct of the honest dog. But

their unfortunate brethren of the same litter, that the lame

sand-pedlar buys, or the old collector of household refuse, or the

needy peasant with his great, cruel clogs--these are chained to heavy

carts or shapeless barrows; they are filthy, mangy, hairless,

emaciated, starving; and follow till they die the circles of a hell

into which they were thrust by a few coppers dropped into some horny

palm. And, in a world less directly subject to man, there must

evidently be partridges, pheasants, deer, hares, which have no luck,

which never escape the gun; while others, one knows not how or why,

emerge unscathed from every battue.

They, therefore, are exposed, like ourselves, to incontestable

injustice. But it does not occur to us, when considering their

hardships, to set all the gods in motion or seek explanation from the

mysterious powers; and yet what happens to them may well be no more

than the image, naively simplified, of what happens to us. It is true

that we play the precise part, in their case, of those mysterious

powers whom we seek in our own. But what right have we to expect from

these last more consciousness, more intelligent justice, than we

ourselves show in our dealings with animals? And in any event, if this

instance shall only have deprived chance of a little of its useless

prestige and have proportionately augmented our spirit of initiative

and struggle, there will be a gain the importance of which is by no

means to be despised.

8

Still further allowance must therefore be made; but yet there

undoubtedly remains--at least as far as the more complex life of man is

concerned--a cause of good or evil fortune as yet untouched by our

explanations, in the often visible will of chance, which one might

almost call the "small change" of fatality. We know--and this is one

of those formless but fundamental ideas on the laws of life that the

experience of thousands of years has turned into a kind of instinct--we

know that men exist who, other things being equal, are "lucky" or

"unlucky." Circumstances permitted me to follow very closely the

career of a friend of mine who was dogged by persistent ill-fortune. I

do not mean to imply by this that his life was unhappy. It is even

remarkable that the malign influences always respected the broad lines

of his veritable happiness; probably because these were well guarded.

For he had in him a strong moral existence, profound thoughts and

hopes, feelings and convictions. He was well aware that these were

possessions that fortune could not touch: which indeed could not be

destroyed without his consent. Destiny is not invincible; through

life's very centre runs a great inward canal, which we have the power

to turn towards happiness or sorrow; although its ramifications, that

extend over our days, and the thousand tributaries that flow in from

external hazards, are all independent of our will.

It is thus that a beautiful river, streaming down from the heights and

ashine with magnificent glaciers, passes at length through plains and

through cities, whence it receives only poisonous water. For an

instant the river is troubled; and we fear lest it lose, and never

recover again, the image of the pure blue sky that the crystal

fountains had lent: the image that seemed its soul, and the deep and

the limpid expression of its great strength. But if we rejoin it, down

yonder, beneath those great trees, we shall find that it has already

forgotten the foulness of the gutters. It has caught the azure again

in its transparent waves; and flows on to the sea, as clear as it was

on the days when it first smilingly leapt from its source on the

mountains.

And so, as regards this friend of mine, although forced more than once

to shed tears, they were at least not of the kind that memory never

forgets, not of those that fall from our eyes as we mourn our own

death. Every failure, the inevitable disappointment once over, served

only in effect to knit him the closer to his secret happiness, to

affirm this within him, and draw a more sombre outline around it, that

it might thereby appear the more precious, and ardent, and certain.

But no sooner had he quitted this charmed enclosure than hostile

incidents vied with each other in their attacks upon him. As for

instance--he was a very good fencer: he had three duels, and was

wounded each time by a less skilful adversary. If he went on board

ship, the voyage would rarely be prosperous. Whatever undertaking he

put money into was sure to turn out badly. A judicial error, into

which a whole series of curiously malevolent circumstances dragged him,

was productive of long and serious trouble. Further, although his face

was agreeable, and the expression of his eyes loyal and frank, he was

not what one calls "sympathetic": he did not arouse at first sight that

spontaneous affection which we often give, without knowing why, to the

unknown who passes, to an enemy even. Nor was he more fortunate in his

affections. Of a loving disposition, and infinitely worthier of being

loved than most of those to whom he was sacrificed by the

chance-governed heart of women--here again he met with nothing but

treachery, deceit and sorrow. He went his way, extricating himself as

best he could from the paltry snares that malicious fortune prepared at

every step; nor was he discouraged or deeply saddened, only somewhat

surprised at so strange a persistence; until at last there came the

great and solitary good fortune of his life: a love that was the

complement of the one that was eager within him, a love that was

complete, passionate, exclusive, unalterable. And from that moment it

was as though he had come under the influence of another star, the

beneficent rays of which were blending with his own; vexatious events

grew slowly remoter, fewer, warier of attacking him, tardier in their

approach. They seemed reluctantly to abandon their habit of selecting

him as their victim. He actually saw his _luck turn_. And now that he

has gone back, as it were, into the indifferent and neutral atmosphere

of chance common to most men, he smiles when he remembers the time when

every gesture of his was watched by the invisible enemy, and aroused a

danger.

9

Let us not look to the gods for an explanation of these phenomena.

Until these gods shall have clearly explained themselves, there is

nothing that they can explain for us. And destiny, which is merely the

god of which we know least, has less right than any of the others to

intervene and cry to us, as it does from the depths of its inscrutable

night: "It is I who so willed it!" Nor let us invoke the illimitable

laws of the universe, the intentions of history, the will of the

worlds, the justice of the stars. These powers exist: we submit to

them, as we submit to the might of the sun. But they act without

knowing us; and within the wide circle of their influence a liberty

remains to us still that is probably immense. They have better work on

hand than to be for ever bending over us to lift a blade of grass or

drop a leaf in the little paths of our anthill. Since we ourselves are

here the parties concerned, it is, I imagine, within ourselves that the

key of the mystery shall be found; for it is probable that every

creature carries within him the best solution of the problem that he

presents. Within us, underlying the conscious existence that our

reason and will control, is a profounder existence, one side of which

connects with a past beyond the record of history, the other with a

future that thousands of years cannot exhaust. We may safely conceive

that all the gods lie hidden within it; that those wherewith we have

peopled the earth and the planets will emerge one by one, in order to

give it a name and a form that our imagination may understand. And as

man's vision grows clearer, as he shows less desire for image and

symbol, so will the number of these names, the number of these forms,

tend to diminish. He will slowly arrive at the stage when there shall

be one only that he will proclaim, or reserve; when it shall be

revealed to him that this last form, this last name, is truly no more

than the last image of a power whose throne was always within him.

Then will the gods that had gone forth from us be found again in

ourselves; and it is there that we will question them to-day.

10

The Buried Temple · 第 9 / 11 段