Coals, though, of course, not an article of Food, were undoubtedly of

use in cooking it: and may therefore be mentioned here. Our

Grandfathers paid very dearly for them: but it must be remembered

there was no land carriage, and a continued contrary wind, or a "hot

press," would leave the London Market bare. The magnificent basins of

Inland Coals were scarcely known, and only those like the Moira

Collieries, near to a Canal, could be worked. They were sold to the

consumer at per Chaldron of 2800 lbs., and the prices below quoted

represent them ex-ship. Add to this the cost of delivery and profit

12s., and take the Sovereign as being worth 30s., and it will much

account for the small stoves then in vogue.

"The price of Coals in the Pool, yesterday, were:--Best 43s.

Inferior sorts from 36s. to 38s. Delivered to housekeepers 49s.

to 44s. The price rose considerably yesterday from a report that

several colliers had been captured."--(_Times, Feby. 12, 1793._)

* * * * *

"COAL EXCHANGE.

"On Monday the price was 70s. per Chaldron all sorts.

On Wednesday, the price was 60s. and some sorts lower.

On Yesterday, the price was 50s. to 45s. per Chaldron.

We are happy at giving such an agreeable account to our

readers."--(_Times, March 7, 1794._)

* * * * *

"The prices of Coals still continue very high, notwithstanding

above 100 ships have, this week, arrived at market, which are

nearly all sold from 38s. to 44s. per Chaldron: so that the best

sorts cannot be fairly delivered under 50s. per Chaldron. The

number of ships taken out of the trade, into the transport, and

other services, is the cause of the present high price, as the

demand is greater than the supply."--(_Times, Oct. 4, 1794._)

* * * * *

"Many complaints have been made of the high price of coals, and

it is supposed to arise from a combination, but we are well

assured no such cause exists. The long frost having stopped the

navigation of the Thames, what coals remained in the lighters,

and barges, were nearly exhausted at the wharfs, and naturally,

every man possessed of a commodity, looks to extraordinary

profits on unusual events, which has, we understand, occasioned

six, and seven, guineas to be given for a chaldron of coals,

within a few days past, but, had the frost continued, coals would

have been considerably cheaper, than at present, as the ice

admitted the coals being worked over it. There are, at present,

near 50 sail of colliers in the river, not unladen, which contain

about 10,000 chaldrons, for an immediate supply, (but not ten

times that quantity, as erroneously stated in most of the papers)

and, before they can be consumed, we may expect a fresh fleet at

Market."--(_Times, Jany. 30, 1795._)

* * * * *

"Yesterday, there was only one ship of coals, at Market, which

sold at three guineas and a half per chaldron. About 30 sail more

were at sea, and forced into the Humber."--(_Times, Feby. 24,

1795._)

* * * * *

"Coals were on Friday (_12th April_) sold in the Pool at five

guineas per Chaldron. There was only one ship-load at

market."--(_Times, April 15, 1799._)

THE ROAD AND STREETS.

The Highways and Streets were in very far from good condition, the

roads being full of ruts, and the streets when paved, were made of

large "Cobble" Stones, and were full of holes, ofttimes very

dangerous, as we shall see. The foot pavement, except in some of the

best streets, which were flagged, was very narrow, and made of

"Kidney" stones on end, such as may still be met with in the bye-ways

of some country towns. Consequently no one stirred out more than they

could help; the men always on horseback, if single--by "Post," if

accompanied by ladies. It will have been noticed in "Men's dress"

that they all wear boots, if not in the house, and the reason is

plain--they had to be protected against the mud of the streets, and

ready for the saddle. Every man had to learn to ride, and no doubt

this laid the foundation of the Continental opinion, that every

Englishman is a good horseman.

"Young Gentlemen during their Holidays, are supplied with gentle

pleasant Horses of all sizes, and the most careful Attendance and

Instructions for £2 12 6

A Horse to ride for Exercise in the House 0 3 6

Twelve lessons when convenient 2 7 6

Sixteen lessons in four weeks 2 7 0

Single lesson 0 5 0

Book of Instructions for Ladies 0 5 6

Breaking a horse 2 7 6 &c."

--(_Morning Post, Jany. 2, 1788._)

* * * * *

"Advt.--_A CAUTION_ to all Gentlemen who drive Jobb Horses by

their own Coachmen, the Gentleman paying yearly wages to them:

From a Gentleman who has had experience of it.--That the

Coachmaster and Coachmen do agree, the one to give, the other to

receive, annually, a certain sum of money, which can be for no

other purpose than to defraud their employers, demanding so much

more for the price of their horses, to bribe the said Coachmen to

conceal defects in them, and to engage the said Coachmaster to

recommend the said Coachmen: and so vice-versa to employ each

other, if out of place or business. This is a most dishonest, but

general practice of the Coachmasters. The writer of this, to

avoid and discourage the practice of this Knavery, has purchased

his own horses, persuaded no other means will be effectual. This

is written merely to put Gentlemen on their guard, at the expense

of the Advertiser, and will not be inserted again."--(_Times,

July 2, 1795._)

Of course those that could afford it travelled Post--which was charged

one shilling per horse per mile, besides a gratuity to the "boy," but

this was raised to fourteen pence in 1796, when food became so dear.

"So great is the itch of pleasure at this time of year, that on

Sundays it is difficult to find post-horses in London. Last

Sunday General _Fox_, and several other persons of Consideration,

who had business out of town, were confined for want of them,

though they sent as far as the extremity of

Whitechapel."--(_Times, Sept. 2, 1795._)

* * * * *

"The rate of _Posting_ still continues at 14d. per mile, and

nothing but the unanimous determination of the public to resist

so extravagant a charge, can possibly do it away. Some few Post

Masters have, it is true, advertised at 1s., but the general rate

still remains at 14d. This charge took its rise from the

scarcity, and, consequently, the high price of corn: but, at this

moment, when corn has fell one third, nothing can justify the

continuance of what may be justly reprobated as an

_imposition_."--(_Times, July 9, 1796._)

But it was not every one who could afford Posting or even the Stage

Coach,--for them existed the "Stage Wagon"--a most cumbrous affair

with very broad wheels--and some eight horses, the driver being

mounted on a pony--so as to be able to ride round his team. The

following is a very humorous story of a journey by Wagon:--

"A DELIGHTFUL RIDE,

"In the ten-wheeled Caravan, from Greenwich to London.

"We were twenty-four passengers within side, and nine without. It

was my lot to sit in the middle, with a very lusty woman on one

side, and a very thin man on the other. 'Open the window,' said

the former, and she had a child on her lap, whose hands and face

were all besmeared with gingerbread. 'It can't be opened,' said a

little prim coxcomb, 'or I shall get cold.'--'But I say it

shall, Sir,' said a Butcher, who sat opposite to him, and the

Butcher opened it; but, as he stood, or rather bent forward to do

this, the caravan came into a rut, and the Butcher's head, by the

suddenness of the jolt, came into contact with that of the woman

who sat next to me, and made her nose bleed. He begged her

pardon, and she gave him a slap on the face that sounded through

the whole caravan. Two sailors, that were seated near the helm of

this machine, ordered the driver to cast anchor at the next

public-house. He did so; and the woman next to me, called for a

pot of ale, which she offered to me, after she had emptied about

a pint of it, observing, that 'as how she loved ale mightily.' I

could not drink, at which she took much offence; and said, 'I was

mighty squeamish; but thank God, she was as good as I, and kept a

lodging-house in Craven St., where she saw _her betters_ every

day, and so,' continues she, 'here's to you, my dear:' and she

finished the pot. A violent dispute now arose between two stout

looking men, the one a Recruiting Sergeant, and the other a

Gentleman's Coachman, about the _Rights of Man_: and, having

struck two or three blows in the Caravan, they got out into the

road, to decide whether _Tom Paine_ was an _Atheist_, or a

_Deist_. In this contest, victory fell to the Sergeant, and the

driver of the horses was so mauled by the leader of men, that he

was lifted into the vehicle, where he sat in sullen silence all

the rest of the journey.

"Another dispute afterwards arose about politics, which was

carried on with such warmth, as to draw the attention of the

company to the head of the Caravan, where the combatants sat

wedged together like two pounds of Epping butter, whilst a child

incessantly roared at the opposite side, and the mother abused

the two politicians for frightening her babe. The heat was now so

great that all the windows were opened, and with the fresh air,

entered clouds of dust, for the body of the machine is but a few

inches from the surface of the road.

"I trust, Mr. Conductor, you will give this journey to London, a

place in your paper, and, I am, &c. &c.

"Lucy Treadneedle."

--(_Times, Sept. 5, 1794._)

It will be noticed that then, as now, the _Times_, was a powerful organ

for calling public attention to social grievances, and that people

"wrote to" that paper as at the present time. We, in our time, know

the little social inconveniences arising from staying at Hotels,

where, not only does the proprietor charge for attendance, which we,

no more than the writer of this letter, can understand is not included

in his servants' wages--but we, also, if we want good attendance, have

to "tip" the servants as well.

"To the CONDUCTOR of the TIMES.

"Sir,--Having frequent occasion to travel many of the principal

roads of England, I have often witnessed the exorbitant demands

of Inn-keepers, and the no less serious ones of their domestics,

sanctioned only by custom, yet arisen to such a pitch as to

become a burthen unable to be borne by the _poor Tradesman_ who

is obliged to travel to sell his goods, as well as an

inconvenience to the person in _middling circumstances_ of

_life_, who, for his health, or otherwise, has occasion to

travel. Grievances (the latter of which especially), are only

suffered to exist from the disinclination people have to break

through a custom, or to appear singular. Having hinted at the

former, I shall only shew the nature, and point out a remedy for

the latter. It is well known, that let an Innkeeper's bill be

ever so exorbitant, you must not only comply with it, but also

give the servants just as much as if it was reasonable: so that

there is no end of the expence: for instance, if a man who has a

horse, puts up at an inn, besides the usual bill, he must at

least give 1_s._ to the waiter, 6_d._ to the chamber-maid, 6_d._

to the hostler, and 6_d._ to the jack-boot, making together 2_s._

6_d._, and this to be repeated every night he lays on the road (I

speak now of what's expected from those who appear in middling

circumstances of life). The same expence in proportion occurs in

the course of the day: at breakfast, you must give at least 6_d._

between the waiter and hostler. If the traveller only puts up to

have a refreshment, besides paying for his horse's standing, he

must give 3_d._ to the hostler: at dinner 6_d._ to the waiter and

3_d._ to the hostler: at tea 6_d._ between them, so that he gives

away in the day 2_s._ 6_d._, which added to the 2_s._ 6_d._ for

the night, makes 5_s._ per day on an average to servants. Thus he

is putting his hand in his pocket from morning till night, not

merely to satisfy the Landlord's demand, but to appease the

croaking of domestics, who, it is well known, will let you see,

or feel, their displeasure in some way or other if you do not, so

that it is disagreeable to go to that inn the second time where

you do not behave with profuseness at the first, and there is

not only the above inconvenience, but also this, that after all

your givings they are not satisfied, but often abuse you for your

liberality. The following anecdote proves this:--Coming home from

Colchester some time since, I put up at an Inn at Ingatestone,

the Innkeeper's bill was as follows:--Supper 1_s._, beer 3_d._,

bed 1_s._, horse and corn 1_s._ 7_d._--together 3_s._ 10_d._ I

gave away as follows: waiter 1_s._, chambermaid 6_d._, jack-boot

6_d._, hostler, the change out of 2_s._ I paid him for the horse,

being 5_d._, together 2_s._ 5_d._, being 1_s._ 5_d._ less than

the bill. Yet the hostler was so abusive, because I did not give

him more than the odd 5_d._ change, that he actually threatened

me that he would mark me if I came there again. I therefore did,

what I wish every one would do in the like case, punish him on

the spot for his insolence. I appeared to relent that I had not

given him more, and desired him to give me the half-pence again

that I might see for silver for him, which after he had done, I

rode off, leaving him to repent he had not kept what I first gave

him. It may be alleged that these servants have little or no

wages, and therefore ought to receive liberally. Be that as it

may, it is very hard that I am to pay wages to another man's

servants. I pay the master his bill, in which he makes a charge

sufficient to cover his servants' wages, and then he leaves me to

pay his servants besides. If Innkeepers have nothing to pay for

servants, their charges ought to be reasonable in proportion. But

I would meet another objection that is likely to be made, which

is, that what is given to servants at inns is not to be

considered as wages, but as their perquisites. There are two

answers to this, the one, that the very notion of perquisites,

signifies something gotten over and above their usual wages,

whereas it is notorious, that most Innkeepers allow their

servants no wages: the other, that perquisites signify a gift,

now a gift is free, and may be much, or little, as suits the

inclination of the giver, but, according to the modern custom at

inns, he is not permitted to use his discretion, but there must

be a settled sum given to each servant, fixed as to the lowest

quantum, though as much above that mark as he pleases, and, if he

gives less than custom warrants, they have the impudence to tell

him of it. Besides, why should Innkeepers, be exempted from

paying their servants wages, any more than any other tradesman.

If I go into a shop, to buy a few yards of any thing, I am not

charged so much for the trouble of the shopman who cut it off.

Tradesmen are contented to pay their servants out of the profit

of their bills, without saddling it upon their customers: and I

am fully persuaded, were travellers of all descriptions to

withhold for a certain time their usual gifts to servants at

inns, it would ultimately tend to the benefit of those servants

themselves, as well as the comfort of travellers, for when the

servants find their finances so low, they would insist upon, and

would not hire themselves without stipulated wages, after which,

travellers might again resume their former generosity, and what

they then gave, would be looked upon in the light it ought, as a

gift, and not a debt.

"A Constant Reader."

--(_Times, Oct. 17, 1795._)

The following notices will show that, what with over-crowding, and bad

roads, accidents were as frequent by road as they are now by

rail--indeed, the per centage, considering the relative number of

passengers, was much greater. The _basket_ mentioned below, was a huge

wicker work machine attached to the Coach, intended to carry parcels.

"Yesterday the driver of the Chelmsford and London Stage Coach,

was convicted before the Magistrates at the Public Office,

Whitechapel, in three separate penalties of 40_s._ each, for

suffering more than six persons to ride on the roof of the said

Coach.

"The owner and driver of the Bishop Stortford, and London, Stage

Coach, was also convicted in the penalty of £4 for the same

offence: and the driver of the Westham Stage Coach, in the same

penalty, for suffering eight persons to ride on the roof of the

said Coach."--(_Times, Oct. 5, 1795._)

* * * * *

"In despite of continual and fatal accidents, not to mention the

inferior consideration of pains and penalties, the Stage Coaches

still continue to carry extra numbers on the outside. There were

_eleven_ on the coach, and box, of the Gosport Coach, beside the

driver, and _nine_ in the basket, on Thursday last."--(_Times,

Oct. 16, 1795._)

* * * * *

"The pavement in Bridge St. Blackfriars, which has been so long

in a most dangerous state, has sunk near a foot more, within the

last week, so that the roof of the main shore is every hour

expected to give way."--(_Times, Aug. 6, 1794._)

* * * * *

"On Wednesday afternoon, about four o'clock, the Boston Coach

broke down, on the lowest part of Snow Hill, soon after it left

the Saracen's Head Inn. The outside passengers, which were

FOURTEEN in number, and mostly soldiers, were thrown with such

violence on the pavement, that several were bruised, and one

woman was taken to St. Bartholomew's Hospital, where she died, on

Thursday night. The inside passengers, which were five, and a

young child, were not much hurt.

"The frequent accidents which arise from the outsides of coaches

being so overladen, calls highly for reprehension. The laws are

either inadequate to remedy the evil, or they are not properly

enforced: and we sincerely hope that the coachman, and those who

are concerned, will be severely punished, as an example to

prevent the same accidents in future. We think there should be a

fresh Act of Parliament, and, if the inside passengers were

empowered, after taking their seats, to hire a post-chaise where

there was above a stipulated number (at the owner's expence), it

would remedy the evil."--(_Times, Aug. 8, 1795._)

* * * * *

"The pavement in Bridge St. Blackfriars, still grows worse, and

worse, and not the least notice is taking of it by the Paving

Committee. This is a most scandalous act of neglect; as,

publicly, and privately, the parties have been applied to, who

ought to make the necessary repairs. The ground has now sunk near

three feet. In so well regulated a city, as that of London, this

is a most disgraceful business."--(_Times, Oct., 16, 1799._)

* * * * *

"A few days since, the axle-tree of a carriage was broken in

descending the slope of Blackfriars Bridge, in consequence of the

very large hole, at the bottom of it, on the Surry-side, which is

in the highest degree dangerous. We are not certain that an

indictment would not lay against the Trustees of the Surry Roads,

for the scandalous manner in which they are kept. They vie with

the Paviours, in some parts of the City, and we know not which

are the worst of them. It is not to be conceived the number of

horses that are foundered, by holes in the streets, and

roads."--(_Times, Oct. 5, 1799._)

* * * * *

"From the dangerous state of the pavement in some parts of

London, it might be supposed that the Public paid nothing towards

it. The thoroughfare about the New Church, in the Strand, is so

bad, that two, or three, accidents have lately happened by horses

tumbling down, from their feet catching in the holes."--(_Times,

Sept. 30, 1799._)

GAMING, &c.

We, in this Nineteenth Century of ours, are not so free from the vice

of gambling, that we can afford the luxury of being particularly

censorious over the habits of the last century. We have legislated

against gambling, we are better educated, all our surroundings are

refined, compared to those which our forefathers had to make the most

of. Literature, Art, and Music, are all far more popular, and yet--are

there not Clubs, thinly veiled indeed, but really, and truly, solely

existing for card playing for high stakes, as much as Crockford's ever

was? Have we not reduced the Turf to a science? and has it not come to

such a pass, that an honest Nobleman like Lord Falmouth, will no

longer run his race horses, because of the roguery on the Turf? Is not

the Stock Exchange one huge Gamble? Therefore, in reading the notes

about gaming, in "Old Times," let us remember the beams in our own

eyes, before making a fuss about the motes, that used to be in the

eyes of those that are dead and gone.

But, although Card playing was the rule at every house, in the

evening, yet some did not play, and the utter weariness which is

shewn in this little sketch of Gillray's, is extremely natural and

vivid.

It is in 1789 that we first hear of Lady Archer, who, with Lady

Buckinghamshire, figures so prominently in keeping gaming tables.

[Illustration: A lady at a Card Party who does not play.--1788.]

"The Lady Archer, whose death was announced in this paper of

Saturday, is not the celebrated character whose _cosmetic powers_

have been long held in public estimation."--(_Morning Post, Jan.

5, 1789._)

* * * * *

"It is said that the dealers in _Carmine and dead white_, as well

as the _Perfumers_ in general, have it in contemplation to

present an address to Lady Archer, in gratitude for her not

having DIED according to a late alarming report."--(_Morning

Post, Jan. 8, 1789._)

"A Kick up at a Hazard Table," by Rowlandson, is not only well

drawn--but, doubtless, depicts a gambling affray, to the life.

Lady Archer, and Lady Buckinghamshire did not monopolise the gaming

tables, there were other ladies in the field, and, as the game

generally played, was _Faro_, these _brelandieres_ were called _Faro's

Daughters_.

"Mrs. Sturt's house, in St. James Square, was opened yesterday

evening, for the first time this season, for public play. The

visitors were numerous."--(_Times, Feb. 5, 1793._)

* * * * *

"Many of our young sprigs of fashion, when the campaign opens,

will have other game to attend to than the game of Faro. By

risquing their persons they may serve their country; but by

risquing their property, they can neither benefit the nation, nor

do any good to themselves. Cocking a fire lock will redound more

to their honour than cocking a card: and as they are fond of a

game of _Hazard_, let them take the _chance_ of the field, in

preference to that of the gaming table:

"Some of the _Faro Ladies_ have opened their play houses, and

announced the _Road to Ruin_ until further notice. The

_Gamesters_ was publicly rehearsed in St. James Square on Monday

night."--(_Times, Feb. 6, 1793._)

* * * * *

"The number of new gaming-houses, established at the West End of

the town, is, indeed, a matter of very serious evil: but they are

not likely to decrease while examples of the same nature are held

forth in the higher circles of life. It is needless to point out

any one of these houses in particular: it is sufficient for us to

expose the tricks that are practised at many of them to swindle

the unsuspecting young men of fortune who are entrapped into

these whirlpools of destruction. The first thing necessary is, to

give the guests a good dinner and plenty of wine, which many of

these houses do, gratis. When they are sufficiently intoxicated,

and, having lost all the money about them, their acceptance is

obtained to Bills of Exchange to a considerable amount, which

frequently are paid to avoid the disagreeable circumstance of a

public exposition in a Court of Justice, which is always

threatened, though the gamesters well know that no such measure

durst be adopted by them.

"Should any reluctance, or hesitation, be shewn by the injured

party, to accept these bills, he is shewn into a long room, with

a target at the end of it, and several pistols lying about, where

he is given to understand these sharpers practice a considerable

time of the day in shooting at a mark, and have arrived to such

perfection in this exercise, that either of them can shoot a

pistol ball within an inch of the mark, from the common distance

taken by duellists. A hint is then dropped, that further

hesitation will render the use of the pistols necessary, and

which will again be the case, should he ever divulge what he has

seen, and heard.

"If further particulars, or proofs, are wanting, they may be

known on application to certain _Military characters_, who have

already made some noise in the world."--(_Times, Feb. 14, 1793._)

Old times · 第 12 / 27 段