CONVERSION TO PAST TIME.

2089. An indeterminate subjunctive protasis is rarely thrown into the

past, the present and perfect becoming respectively imperfect and

pluperfect. In this case the form is the same as that of a protasis of

action non-occurrent (2091), and the conversion occurs only when it is

evident from the context that past action is supposed, which may or may

not have occurred: as,

#cūr igitur et Camillus dolēret, sī haec post trecentōs et quīnquāgintā

ferē annōs ēventūra putāret, et ego doleam, sī ad decem mīlia annōrum

gentem aliquam urbe nostrā potītūram putem?# _TD._ 1, 90, _why then

would Camillus have fretted, if he thought this would occur after a

lapse of some three hundred and fifty years, and why should I fret, if I

think that some nation may seize Rome some ten thousand years hence?_

#erat sōla illa nāvis cōnstrāta; quae sī in praedōnum pugnā versārētur,

urbis īnstar habēre inter illōs pīrāticōs myoparōnēs vidērētur#, _V._ 5,

89, _this was the only vessel with a deck; and supposing she figured in

the engagement with the corsairs, she would have loomed up like a town,

surrounded by those pirate cock-boats_. #Sardus habēbat ille Tigellius

hoc; Caesar sī peteret nōn quicquam prōficeret#, H. _S._ 1, 3, 4,

_Tigellius the Sardian had this way; supposing Caesar asked him, naught

had he availed_.

A Latin Grammar for Schools and Colleges · 第 552 / 808 题