WHAT.

_What_ is generally a compound relative, including both the antecedent

and the relative, and is equivalent to _that which_; as, "This is _what_

I wanted;" that is, _that which_, or, _the thing which_ I wanted.

_What_ is compounded of _which that_. These words have been contracted

and made to coalesce, a part of the orthography of both being still

retained: _what--wh[ich--t]hat_; (_which-that_.) Anciently it appeared

in the varying forms, _tha qua, qua tha, qu'tha, quthat, quhat, hwat_,

and finally, _what_.

_What_ may be used as three kinds of a pronoun, and as an interjection.

When it is equivalent to _that which, the thing which_, or _those things

which_, it is a compound relative, because it includes both the

antecedent and the relative; as, "I will try _what_ (that which) can be

found in female delicacy; _What_ you recollect with most pleasure, are

the virtuous actions of your past life;" that is, _those things which_

you recollect, &c.

When _what_ is a compound relative, you must always parse it as two

words; that is, you must parse the antecedent part as a noun, and give

it a case; the relative part you may analyze like any other relative,

giving it a case likewise. In the first of the preceding examples,

_that_, the antecedent part of _what_, is in the obj. case, governed by

the verb "will try;" _which_, the relative part, is in the nom. case to

"can be found." "I have heard _what_ (i.e. _that which_, or _the thing

which_) has been alleged."

_Whoever_ and _whosoever_ are also compound relatives, and should be

parsed like the compound _what_; as, "_Whoever_ takes that oath, is

bound to enforce the laws." In this sentence, _whoever_ is equivalent to

_he who_, or, _the man who_; thus, "_He who_ takes that oath, is bound,"

&c.

_Who, which_, and _what_, when used in asking questions, are called

interrogative pronouns, or relatives of the interrogative kind; as,

_"Who_ is he? _Which_ is the person? _What_ are you doing?"

Interrogative pronouns have no antecedent; but they relate to the word

or phrase which is the answer to the question, for their subsequent; as,

"_Whom_ did you see? The _preceptor. What_ have you done? _Nothing_."

Antecedent and subsequent are opposed to each other in signification.

Antecedent means preceding, or going before; and subsequent means

following, or coming after. _What_, when used as an interrogative, is

never compound.

_What, which_, and _that_, when joined to nouns, are specifying

adjectives, or adjective pronouns, in which situation they have no case,

but are parsed like adjective pronouns of the demonstrative or

indefinite kind; as, "Unto _which_ promise our twelve tribes hope to

come;" "_What_ misery the vicious endure! _What_ havock hast thou made,

foul monster, sin!"

_What_ and _which_, when joined to nouns in asking questions, are

denominated interrogative pronominal adjectives; as, "_What man_ is

that? _Which road_ did he take?"

_What, whatever_, and _whatsoever, which, whichever_, and _whichsoever_,

in constructions like the following, are compound pronouns, but not

compound relatives; as, "In _what_ character Butler was admitted, is

unknown; Give him _what_ name you choose; Nature's care largely endows

_whatever_ happy man will deign to use her treasures; Let him take

_which_ course, or, _whichever_ course he will." These sentences may be

rendered thus; "_That_ character, or, _the_ character in _which_ Butler

was admitted, is unknown; Give him _that_ name, or, _the_ name _which_

you choose; Nature's care endows _that_ happy man _who_ will deign, &c.;

Let him take _that_ course, or _the_ course _which_ he will." A compound

relative necessarily includes both an antecedent and a relative. These

compounds, you will notice, do not include antecedents, the first part

of each word being the article _the_, or the adjective pronoun, _that_;

therefore they cannot properly be denominated compound relatives.--With

regard to the word _ever_ annexed to these pronouns, it is a singular

fact, that, as soon as we analyze the word to which it is subjoined,

_ever_ is entirely excluded from the sentence.

_What_ is sometimes used as an interjection; as, "But _what!_ is thy

servant a dog, that he should do this? _What!_ rob us of our right of

suffrage, and then shut us up in dungeons!"

You have now come to the most formidable obstacle, or, if I may so

speak, to the most rugged eminence in the path of grammatical science;

but be not disheartened, for, if you can get safely over this, your

future course will be interrupted with only here and there a gentle

elevation. It will require close application, and a great deal of sober

thinking, to gain a clear conception of the nature of the relative

pronouns, particularly the compound relatives, which are not easily

comprehended by the young learner. As this eighth lecture is a very

important one, it becomes necessary for you to read it carefully four or

five times over before you proceed to commit the following order.

Whenever you parse, you may spread the Compendium before you, if you

please.

English Grammar in Familiar Lectures Accompanied by a compendium, embracing a new systematic order of parsing, a new system of punctuation, exercises in false syntax, and a system of philosophical grammar, in notes, to which are added an appendix and a key to the exercises : designed for the use of schools and private learners · 第 150 / 369 题