Cremutius Cordus was forced to lay violent hands upon himself, because he

had come into collision with Sejanus. He was at the gates of old age and

had lived most irreproachably, so much so that no sufficient complaint

could be found against him and he was tried for the history which he

had long before composed regarding the deeds of Augustus and the latter

himself had read. The ground of censure was that he had praised Cassius

and Brutus and had attacked the people and the senate. Of Cæsar and

Augustus he had spoken no ill, but at the same time had shown no

excessive respect for them. This was the complaint against him, and this

it was that caused his death as well as the burning of his works,--those

found in the city at this time being destroyed by the ædiles, and those

abroad by the officials of each place. Later they were published again,

for his daughter Marcia in particular, as well as others, had hidden

copies, and they attracted much greater attention by reason of the

unhappy end of Cordus.

About this time Tiberius exhibited to the senators his pretorian cohort

in the act of exercising, as if they were ignorant of his power; his

purpose was to make them more afraid of him, when they saw his defenders

so many and so strong.

Besides these events of the time that seem worthy to chronicle in a

history, the people of Cyzicus were once more deprived of their freedom

because they had imprisoned certain Romans and because they had not

completed the heroüm to Augustus that they had begun to build.--And the

emperor would certainly have put to death the man who sold the emperor's

statue along with his house and was brought to trial for the act, had not

the consul asked the ruler himself to give his vote first. Being ashamed

to appear partial to himself, he cast his ballot for acquittal.

Also a senator, Lentulus, an excellent man naturally and now far advanced

in old age, was accused by some one of having plotted against the

emperor. Lentulus was present and burst out laughing. At this an uproar

arose in the senate, which was calmed by Tiberius saying: "I am no longer

worthy to live, if Lentulus, too, hates me."

[Footnote 1: Reading [Greek: epratten] (Boissevain) in place of the MS.

[Greek: eplatten].]

[Footnote: 2: This was the name of a celebrated gladiator of the time.

(Compare Horace, Epistles, I, 18, 19.)]

[Footnote 3: This is M. Pomponius Marcellus.]

[Footnote 4: Reported elsewhere as _Clutorius_ or _Cluturius Priscus_.

The error may probably be referred to Dio as well as to Xiphilus, through

whom this particular chapter comes. (See Dessau, Prosop. Imp. Rom., I,

p.425)]

[Footnote 5: The version of Zonaras says: "whom some record as Julia,

others as Livia." Inscriptions give her name as either _Claudia Livia_ or

_Livilla_. From these two pieces of evidence Boissevain with customary

acumen concludes that Dio's original words were probably: "whom some name

Livilla, and others Livia."]

DIO'S ROMAN HISTORY

58

Tiberius withdraws to Capreæ: Sabinus loses his life through the

treachery of Latiarius (chapter 1).

About the death of Livia (chapter 2).

Gallus is condemned to consume away by a slow death (chapter 3).

Sejanus, puffed up by excessive honors, is put to death together with his

household and friends by the artifice of Tiberius (chapters 4-19).

The method of selecting magistrates and of holding comitia (chapter 20).

The lustfulness of Tiberius, his cruelty towards his own family and

others, and likewise his greed (chapters 21-25).

About Artabanus, the Parthian King, and about Armenia (chapter 26).

About the death of Thrasyllus (chapter 27).

About the death of Tiberius (chapter 28).

DURATION OF TIME.

Cn. Lentulus Gætulicus, C. Calvisius Sabinus. (A.D. 26 = a. u. 779 =

Thirteenth of Tiberius, from Aug. 19th.)

M. Licinius Crassus, L. Calpurnius Piso. (A.D. 27 = a. u. 780 =

Fourteenth of Tiberius.)

App. Iunius Silanus, P. Silius Nerva. (A.D. 28 = a. u. 781 = Fifteenth of

Tiberius.)

L. Rubellius Geminus, C. Fufius Geminus. (A.D. 29 = a. u. 782 = Sixteenth

of Tiberius.)

M. Vinicius Quartinus, L. Cassius Longinus. (A.D. 30 = a. u. 783 =

Seventeenth of Tiberius.)

Tiberius Aug. (V), L. Ælius Seianus. (A.D. 31 = a. u. 784 = Eighteenth of

Tiberius.)

Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus, Furius Camillus Scribonianus. (A.D. 32 = a. u.

785 = Nineteenth of Tiberius.)

Serv. Sulpicius Galba, L. Cornelius Sulla, (A.D. 33 = a. u. 786 =

Twentieth of Tiberius.)

L. Vitellius, Paulus Fabius Persicus. (A.D. 34 = a. u. 787 = Twenty-first

of Tiberius.)

C. Cestius Gallus, M. Servilius Nonianus. (A.D. 35 = a. u. 788 =

Twenty-second of Tiberius.)

Sex. Papinius, Q. Plautius. (A.D. 36 = a. u. 789 = Twenty-third of

Tiberius.)

Cn. Acerronius Proculus, C. Pontius Nigrinus. (A.D. 37 = a. u. 790 =

Twenty-fourth of Tiberius, to March 26th.)

_(BOOK 57, BOISSEVAIN.)_

[A.D. 26 (_a. u._ 779)]

[-1-] He went away about this time from Rome and never returned to the

city at all, though he was ever on the point of doing so and kept sending

messages to that effect.

[A.D. 27 (_a. u._ 780)]

Much calamity could be laid by the Romans at his door, since

he wasted the lives of men alike for public service and for

private whim, as when he decided to expel the hunting

spectacles from the city. Consequently some persons attempted

to carry them on in the country outside and perished in the

ruins of their theatres, which had been loosely

constructed of rude planks.

[A.D. 28 (_a. u._ 781)]

It was now, too, that a certain Latiarius, a companion of Sabinus (one of

the most prominent men at Rome) and also in favor with Sejanus, concealed

senators in the ceiling of the apartment where his friend lived and led

Sabinus into conversation. By throwing out some of his usual remarks he

induced the other also to speak out freely all that he had in his mind.

It is the practice of such as wish to play the sycophant to take the lead

in some kind of abuse and to disclose some secret, intending that their

victim either for listening to them or for saying something similar may

find himself liable to indictment. To the sycophants, since they do it

with a purpose, freedom of speech involves no danger. They are regarded

as speaking so not because their words express their real sentiments but

because they wish to convict others. Their victims, however, are punished

for the smallest syllable out of the ordinary that they may utter. This

also happened in the present case. Sabinus was put in prison that very

day and subsequently perished without trial. His body was flung down the

Scalæ Gemoniæ and cast into the river. The affair was made more tragic by

the behavior of a dog of Sabinus that went with him to his cell, was

by him at his death, and at the end was thrown into the river with

him.--Such was the nature of this event.

[Sidenote: A.D. 29 (_a. u._ 782)]

[-2-] During this same period Livia also passed away at the age of

eighty-six. Tiberius paid her no visits while she was ill and did not

personally attend to her laying out. In fact, he made no arrangements at

all in her honor save the public funeral and images and some other small

matters of no importance. As for her being deified, he forbade that

absolutely. The senate, however, did not content itself with voting

merely the measures which he had ordained, but enjoined upon the women

mourning for her during the entire year, although it approved the course

of Tiberius in not abandoning even at this time the conduct of public

business. Furthermore they voted her an arch (as had never been done in

the case of any other woman), because she had preserved not a few of

them, had reared many children belonging to citizens, and had helped

find husbands for numerous girls,--for all of which acts some called her

Mother of her Country. She was buried in the mausoleum of Augustus.

Tiberius would not pay a single one of her bequests to anybody.

Among the many excellent utterances of hers that are related is one

concerned with the occasion when some men that were naked met her and on

that account fell under sentence of execution; she saved their lives by

saying that to chaste women such persons were no whit different from

statues. When some one asked her how and by what course of action she had

obtained such an influence over Augustus, she answered that it was by

being scrupulously chaste herself, doing willingly whatever pleased him,

not meddling with any of his business, and particularly by pretending

neither to hear of nor notice the favorites that were the objects of his

passion. Such was the character of Livia. The arch voted to her, however,

was not built for the reason that Tiberius promised to construct it

at his own expense. For, as he disliked to annul the decree by direct

command, he made it void in this way, by not allowing the work to be

undertaken out of the public funds nor attending to it himself.

[A.D. 29 or 30]

Sejanus was rising to still greater heights. It was voted that his

birthday should be publicly observed, and the mass of statues which the

senate and the equestrian order, the tribes and the foremost citizens set

up, would have passed any one's power to count. Separate envoys were sent

to both these "rulers" by the senate as well as the knights and also by

the people, who selected them from their own tribunes and aediles. For

both of them alike they offered prayers and sacrifices and they took

oaths by their Fortunes.

[A.D. 30 (a. u. 783)]

[-3-] Gallus, who married the wife of Tiberius and spoke his mind

regarding the empire, was the next object of the emperor's attack, for

which the right moment had been carefully selected. [Whether he really

believed that Sejanus would be emperor or whether it was out of fear of

Tiberius, he paid court to the former. It may indeed, have been a kind

of plot, to make the minister irksome to Tiberius and so accomplish his

ruin: but at any rate Gallus transacted the greater and more important

part of his business with him and made efforts to be one of the envoys.

Therefore the emperor sent a report about him to the senate, making among

other statements one to the effect that this man was jealous of his

friendship for Sejanus, although Gallus himself treated Syriacus as an

intimate friend. He did not make this known to Gallus, entertaining him

most hospitably instead.] Hence something most unusual befell him that

never happened to any one else. On the very same day he was banqueted at

the house of Tiberius, pledging him in the cup of friendship, and was

condemned before the senate. Indeed, a prætor was sent to imprison him

and lead him away for punishment. Yet Tiberius, though he had acted so,

did not permit his victim to die, in spite of the latter's wish for death

as soon as he learned the decree. Instead, he bade Gallus (in order to

make his lot still more dismal) to be of good cheer and instructed the

senate[1] that he should be guarded without bonds until the emperor

should reach the City; his object, as I said, was to make the prisoner

suffer for the longest possible time both from deprivation of his civic

rights and from terror. So it turned out. He was kept under the eyes of

the consuls of each year except when Tiberius held the office, in that

case he was guarded by the prætors, not to prevent his escape, but to

prevent his death. He had no companion or servant as associate, spoke to

no one, saw no one, except when he was compelled to take food. And what

he got was of such a quality and amount as neither to afford him any

pleasure or strength nor yet to allow him to die. This was the worst

feature of it. Tiberius did the same thing in the case of many others.

For instance, he had imprisoned one of his companions, and when there was

later talk about executing him, he said: "I have not yet made my peace

with him." Some one else, again, he had tortured very severely, and then

on ascertaining that the victim had been unjustly accused he had him

killed with all speed, remarking that he had been too terribly outraged

to find any satisfaction in living. Syriacus, who had neither committed

nor been charged with any wrong, but was renowned for his education, was

slain merely for the reason that Tiberius said he was a friend of Gallus.

[Sejanus brought false accusation also against Drusus, through the medium

of his wife. For, by maintaining illicit relations with practically all

the wives of the distinguished men, he learned what their husbands said

and did, and further made them his assistants by promises of marriage.

Now when Tiberius without discussion sent Drusus to Rome, Sejanus,

fearing that his position might be injured, persuaded Cassius [2] to busy

himself against him.]

After exalting Sejanus to a high pinnacle of glory and making him a

member of his family by the alliance with Julia, daughter of Drusus,

Tiberius later killed him.

[-4-] Now Sejanus was growing greater and more formidable all the time,

and his progress made the senators and the rest look up to him as if he

were actually emperor and esteem Tiberius lightly. When Tiberius learned

this, he did not regard the matter as a trivial one, fearing, indeed,

that they would hail his rival as emperor outright, and he did not

neglect it. Yet he did nothing openly, for Sejanus had won the entire

pretorian guard thoroughly to his own side and had gained the favor of

the senators partly by benefits, partly by implanting hopes, and partly

by intimidation. He had made all the attendants on Tiberius so entirely

his friends that absolutely everything the emperor did was at once

reported to him, whereas of what he did not a word reached Tiberius's

ears. Hence the latter appeared content to follow where Sejanus led,

appointed him consul, and termed him Sharer of his Cares, repeating often

the phrase "My Sejanus," and publishing the same by writing it to the

senate and the people. Men took this behavior as sincere and were

deceived, and so set up bronze statues all about to both alike, wrote

their names together in bulletins, and brought into the theatres gilded

chairs for both. Finally it was voted that they should together be made

consuls every four years and that a body of citizens should go out to

meet both alike whenever they entered Rome. In the end they sacrificed to

the images of Sejanus as to those of Tiberius. This was the way matters

stood with Sejanus. Now among the rest many famous men met an ill fate,

of whom was also Gaius Fufius Geminus. Being accused of the crime of

maiestas against Tiberius he took his will into the senate-chamber and

read it, showing that he had left his inheritance in equal portions to

his children and to his sovereign. As he was charged with weakness he

went home before any vote was reached. When he learned that the quæstor

had arrived to attend to his execution, he wounded himself and displaying

the wound to the official exclaimed: "Report to the senate that it is

thus one dies who is a man." Likewise, his wife, Mutilia Prisca, against

whom some complaint was made, made her way into the senate and there

stabbed herself with a dagger, which she had brought in secretly.

Next he destroyed Mutilia and her husband together with two daughters on

account of her friendship for his mother.

In the days of Tiberius all who accused any persons regularly received

money and large allotments both from the victims' property and from the

public treasury in addition to various honors. There were cases where

certain men who impudently threw others into a panic or recklessly passed

the death sentence upon them obtained in the one instance statues and

in the other triumphal honors. Hence several citizens who were really

illustrious and conquered the right to some such distinction would not

assume it out of reluctance to let any period of their lives betray even

a superficial similarity to the careers of those scoundrels.

Tiberius, feigning sickness, sent Sejanus on to Rome with the assurance

that he should follow. He declared that in this separation a part of his

own body and soul was wrenched away from him: shedding tears he embraced

and kissed him, and Sejanus naturally was thereat the more elated.

[A.D. 31 (a u. 784)]

[-5-] By this time Sejanus was so imposing both in his haughtiness of

mind and in his immensity of power that, to make a long matter short, he

seemed to be the emperor and Tiberius a kind of island potentate because

the latter spent all his days in the island called Capreæ. Then there was

rivalry and jostling about the great man's doors from the fear not merely

that a person might fail to be observed by his patron but that he might

appear among the last: for all the words and gestures, particularly of

those in front, were carefully watched. People who hold a prominent

position as the result of native worth are not given at all to seeking

signs of friendship from others, and in case anything of the sort is seen

to be wanting on the part of these others the persons in question are not

provoked, inasmuch as they have an innate consciousness that they are not

being looked down upon. Any, however, that hold an artificial rank are

extremely jealous of all such attentions, feeling them to be necessary to

render their position complete. If they fail to obtain them then they

are as irritated as if slander were being pronounced against them and as

angry as if they were the recipients of positive insult. Consequently

the world is more scrupulous in the case of such persons than (one might

almost say) in the case of emperors themselves. To the latter it is

ascribed as a virtue to pardon any one if an error is committed; but in

the self-made persons that course appears to argue an inherent weakness,

whereas to attack and to exact vengeance is thought to furnish proof of

great power.

One morning, the first of the month, when all were gathered at Sejanus's

house, the couch placed in the small room where he received broke into

infinitesimal fragments under the weight of the throng seated upon it;

and, as he was leaving the house, a weasel darted through the midst of

them. After he had sacrificed on the Capitol and was now coming down to

the Forum, his servants that acted as body-guard turned aside along

the road leading to the prison, because the crowd prevented them from

escorting him, and as they descended the steps down which condemned

criminals were commonly cast they slipped and fell. Subsequently he took

the auspices and not one bird of good omen appeared, but crows flew and

cawed about him and then flew off all together to the jail, where they

alighted.

[-6-] These prodigies neither Sejanus nor any one else laid to heart.

For, in view of the way things stood, not even if some god had plainly

foretold that so great a change would take place in a short time, would

any one have believed it. They swore by his Fortune as if they would

never be weary, and hailed him colleague of Tiberius, making this phrase

refer not to the consulship but to the supreme power. Tiberius was no

longer uninformed of aught that concerned his minister. He racked his

brains to see in what manner he might kill him, but, not finding any way

in which he might do this openly and safely, he treated both the man

himself and all the rest in a remarkable fashion, so as to gain an

accurate knowledge of their feeling. He sent many despatches of all kinds

regarding himself to Sejanus and to the senate incessantly, saying at one

time that he was poorly and just at the point of death, and again that

he was in exceedingly good health and would reach Rome directly. Now he

would strongly approve Sejanus and again vehemently denounce him. Some of

his companions he would honor to show his regard for him, and others he

would dishonor. Thus Sejanus, filled in turn with extreme elation

and extreme fear, was always in a flutter. He could not decide to be

terrified and for that reason attempt a revolution, inasmuch as he was

being honored, nor yet to become bold enough to attempt some desperate

venture inasmuch as he was frequently abased. Moreover, all the rest of

the people were getting to feel dubious, because they heard alternately

and at short intervals the most contrary reports, because they could no

longer justify themselves in either admiring or despising Sejanus, and

because they were wondering about Tiberius, thinking first that he was

going to die and then that his arrival was imminent.

[-7-] Sejanus was disturbed by all this, and a great deal more by the

fact that from one of his statues at first a mass of smoke ascended in a

burst, and then, when the head was taken off to enable investigators to

see what was going on, a huge serpent darted up. Another head at once

replaced the former, and accordingly he was on the point of sacrificing

to himself (for sacrificing to himself was a regular part of his

program), when a rope was discovered coiled around the statue's neck.

Also a figure of Fortuna, made (as is said) in the time of Tullius, an

early king of Rome,--one which Sejanus at this time kept at his house and

took great pride in,--he saw turn away while he was sacrificing in

person ... and later others who had gone out in their company.[3] Most

men were suspicious of these circumstances, but since they did not know

the mind of Tiberius and further took into consideration the latter's

caprice and the unstable condition of affairs, they were divided in

sentiment. Privately they kept a sharp eye on their own safety, but

publicly they paid court to him, among other reasons because Tiberius

had joined to [him][4] as priests both Sejanus and his son. Moreover, they

had given him the proconsular authority and had likewise voted that word

be sent to all such as were consuls from year to year to emulate him in

their office. So Tiberius had honored him with the priesthoods, but he

did not send for him: instead, when his minister requested that he might

go to Campania, pleading as an excuse that his fiancée was ill, the

emperor directed him to stay where he was, giving as a reason that he

would himself arrive in Rome in almost no time.

[-8-] As a result, then, of this, Sejanus was again gradually alienated

and his vexation was increased by the fact that Tiberius appointed Gaius

priest with the imperial commendation and gave some hints to the effect

that he should make the new appointee his successor in the empire. The

angry favorite would have begun rebellious measures, especially as the

soldiers were ready to obey him in everything, had he not perceived that

the populace was hugely pleased at what was said in regard to Gaius,

out of reverence for the memory of Germanicus his father. Sejanus had

previously thought that these persons, too, were on his side, and now,

finding them enthusiastic for Gaius, he became dejected. He felt sorry

that he had not shown open revolt during his consulship. The rest were

strongly influenced against him by the course of events [5] as also by

Tiberius's action in releasing soon after an enemy of Sejanus, chosen ten

years before to govern Spain and just now being tried on certain charges.

Because of Sejanus the emperor also granted temporary immunity from

such suits to such others as were going to govern any provinces or to

administer any similar public business. And in writing to the senate

about the death of Nero he used simply the name Sejanus, with no phrases

added as had been his custom. Moreover, he forbade offering sacrifice to

any human being (because sacrifice was often offered to this man) and

the introduction of any business looking to his own honor (because many

honorary measures were being passed for his rival's benefit). He had

forbidden this practice still earlier, but now, on account of Sejanus, he

renewed his injunction. For naturally, if he allowed nothing of the

sort to be done in his own case, he would not permit it in the case of

another.

Dio's Rome, Volume 4 An Historical Narrative Originally Composed in Greek During the Reigns of Septimius Severus, Geta and Caracalla, Macrinus, Elagabalus and Alexander Severus: and Now Presented in English Form · 第 18 / 27 段