“MY LORD,—I have received and read to my Lords Commissioners of the

Admiralty your letter of the 27th inst., and have nothing in command

from their Lordships to communicate to you.

“I am, &c. &c.

“EVAN NEPEAN.

“Captain Lord Cochrane.”

In spite of this rebuff, I nevertheless continued to persevere, but

it was not till some years afterwards that the promotion of

Lieutenant Parker was obtained, with a result to that able and

gallant officer which proved his ruin, and eventually caused his

death.

The circumstances under which this took place were positively

diabolical. Despairing of promotion, Lieutenant Parker had retired

to a little farm near Kinsale, by the cultivation of which, in

addition to his half-pay, he was realising an existence for his

family. From my determined perseverance on his behalf, he was at

length made commander, and ordered to join the _Rainbow_ sloop,

represented to be stationed in the West Indies. Selling off

everything, even to his household furniture, he proceeded to

Barbadoes, and reported himself to Sir Alexander Cochrane; but, as

the vessel could not be found, Sir Alexander furnished him with a

passage to look for her at the Bermudas, where he supposed she might

be fitting for sea. Not finding her there, Lieutenant Parker

returned to Barbadoes, when _it became evident that no such vessel

was on the North American station_.

On ascertaining this, poor Parker returned to England a ruined man.

Lord Melville, who had succeeded as First Lord, expressed his

surprise and regret that such a circumstance should have occurred,

and promised the unhappy man that he should not only be amply

compensated for the loss and expense attending his outfit and

fruitless voyage to the West Indies, but that he should have another

command on the first opportunity. This generous intention was

however counteracted, for _he never received either the one or the

other_.

Lieutenant Parker’s loss, consequent to the sale of his property,

the expense attendant on settling his family, together with his

outfit and voyage, amounted to upwards of 1000_l._ His prospects

ruined, his domestic arrangements destroyed, and his pride wounded,

his spirit and constitution gradually gave way, and at length

overwhelmed with sorrow he sank into a premature grave, leaving a

wife and four daughters to deplore the loss of their only protector.

I never could find out who had thus imposed on one of the most

gallant officers in the Navy this infamous deception, concocted,

doubtless, out of pure malevolence to myself. Be he whom he may, I

am very sorry that it is not in my power to hold up his name to the

execration of posterity. It is even at the present day the duty of

the Admiralty to remedy the injury inflicted on his destitute

family—for he had left four daughters unprovided for, who had no

opportunity to escape from indigence.

CHAP. VIII.

NAVAL ADMINISTRATION SIXTY YEARS AGO.

POLITICAL FAVOURITISM.—REFUSAL OF FURTHER EMPLOYMENT.—NAVAL

CORRUPTION.—DOCKYARD PRACTICES.—SHAMEFUL TREATMENT OF PRISONERS OF

WAR.—ECONOMY THE REMEDY.—RESULTS OF MEDICAL ECONOMY.—EMPTY PHYSIC

BOTTLES.—SEAMEN’S AVERSION TO THE SERVICE.—A POST CAPTAIN AT

COLLEGE.

It will be evident on a perusal of the previous chapter, that there was

no fixed principle for the promotion of officers who had distinguished

themselves, but that however desirous the Board might be to reward their

services, it was in the power of persons holding inferior offices to

thwart the intentions of the Board itself.

Were such a principle admitted, nothing could be more detrimental to the

service. Let every officer know the regulated reward for a national

service, with the certainty that he cannot be deprived of it, and rely

upon it, that whenever opportunity presents itself, the service will be

performed. There is nothing mercenary, or even selfish about this; but,

on the contrary, an ambition which should be carefully fostered.

In my own case, I can conscientiously avow my leading motive to have

been that of exerting myself to the utmost in the hope of thereby

attaining promotion in my profession, to which promotion the capture of

an enemy’s frigate, as well as of a large number of privateers and other

vessels, had entitled me, according to a judicious rule for the

encouragement of efforts useful to the nation—to a place on the list,

from which I conceived myself unjustly excluded by the promotion of a

younger man, a junior commander too, for no great apparent reason than

that of his father being a personal and political friend of the First

Lord of the Admiralty.

To those who may think my conduct towards the First Lord and the Board

disrespectful, I can only say, that were my life to begin anew, with my

present experience of consequences, I would again pursue the same

course. I cannot imagine anything more detrimental to the interests of

the Navy and the nation, than political favouritism on the part of the

Admiralty—of itself sufficient to damp that ardour which should form one

of the first requisites for future command. I would rather say to the

young officer—“If you have, in the exercise of your profession, acquired

a right which is wrongfully withheld—demand it, stick to it with

unshaken pertinacity;—none but a corrupt body can possibly think the

worse of you for it; even though you may be treated like myself—you are

doing your country good service by exposing favouritism, which is only

another term for corruption.”

Favouritism on the part of the Admiralty must ever be the bane of the

Navy, and may prove its ruin. Either let it be understood that the

institution is a parliamentary vote market, or that it is what it ought

to be—an institution for the promotion of zeal by the reward of merit.

Only let it not sustain both characters, or between the two stools the

country may one day go to the ground.

Such was the offence taken by the authorities at my persistence in my

own right, and in that of the officers under my command, that an

application to the Board for another ship met with refusal; and as it

was clear that Lord St. Vincent’s administration did not again intend to

employ me, the time on my hands was devoted to an investigation of those

abuses which were paralysing the Navy; not that this was entered upon

from any spirit of retaliation on the Admiralty, but as preparatory to

the more ambitious aim of getting into Parliament, and exposing them.

One of the most crying evils of our then naval administration had fallen

heavily upon me, though so young in command—viz. the Admiralty Courts;

but for the peculations consequent on which, the cruise of the _Speedy_

ought to have sent home myself, officers, and crew, with competence. As

it was, we got all the fighting, whilst the Admiralty Court and its

hungry parasites monopolised the greater portion of our hard-won

prize-money. In many cases they took the whole! and in one case brought

me in debt, though the prize was worth several thousand pounds!

Hitherto no naval officer had ventured to expose, in Parliament or out

of it, this or indeed any other gross abuse of the naval service; and

having nothing better to do, want of employment appeared to offer a

fitting opportunity for constituting myself the Quixote of the

profession; sparing no pains to qualify for the task, though well aware

of its arduous, if not hopeless nature—as directed against a mass of

corruption, such as—it is to be hoped—may never again strike at the

noblest arm of our national safety a blow worse than any enemy can

inflict.

After what has been stated with regard to my unpleasant relations with

Lord St. Vincent and his Board of Admiralty, it will perhaps be better

not personally to enter on the subject of then existing naval abuses,

lest I might be suspected of exaggerating their extent. Some such

explanation is necessary in justification of the course which I

subsequently thought it my duty to pursue, but it will answer every

purpose to have recourse to the experience of a contemporary

officer—Captain Brenton, the biographer of Lord St. Vincent—in

justification of my self-imposed task:—

“In the first edition of the Naval History, I have commented on the

profligate system of hired vessels and transports. In this—borough

influence reigned paramount, and the most solid information was

disregarded when the perpetrator of the greatest frauds was a

supporter of Government.”—(BRENTON’S _Life of Lord St. Vincent_, p.

167.)

“A ship purchased by a man of influence was a certain fortune to him.

He cleared his money in the first year at the rate of 400_l._ per

month, and if the ship were coppered at 7500_l._ per annum. About

twenty copper-bottomed transports were lying for three years in the

harbour of Messina, without being employed in any duty.”—(p. 169.)

The expense of these alone, no doubt all owned by “men of influence” as

Captain Brenton terms them, was for the three years 270,000_l._ As these

transports formed only a trifling illustration of the system, there is

little wonder at the enormous accumulation of the national debt, for

results so inadequate.

Captain Brenton might have gone farther, and stated with great truth,

that not only were transports hired from men of influence, but that

vessels utterly worthless were purchased by the Government from their

political supporters, and then patched up into ships of war! It was my

misfortune to be subsequently appointed to _a collier_ so converted—with

what result will appear in the sequel.

From the ships let us follow Captain Brenton into the dockyards:—

“When Mr. Colquhoun, in his celebrated police reports, stated that the

Government was plundered from the dockyards at the rate of _a million

a year_, he was supposed to have exceeded all probability. I am

satisfied he was under the mark, and if the _consequences_ of these

frauds are added to the amount of peculation, the aggregate will be

frightful. The manner in which the villany was carried on was dreadful

indeed. _Whole ships’ crews were destroyed at one fell swoop._ Every

ship was supposed to have a certain number of bolts driven to secure

her fabric. The tops and points of the bolts only were driven, and the

rest was carried away. It is probable that the loss of the _York_ of

64 guns, and the _Blenheim_ of 74 guns, was the consequence. The

_Albion_, 74, we know to have been nearly lost by this hellish

fraud.”—(BRENTON, pp. 159, 160.)

“I can remember what our slop clothing was, for which the poor seamen

were charged an extravagant price; the contract being _always given as

a matter of favour for electioneering purposes_.”—(p. 156.)

“Not only were the grossest impositions practised in the supply of the

most important stores, by sending in damaged goods, but even the raw

materials were _again sold_ before they reached their

destination.”—(p. 157.)

“At the cooperage of Deptford, 1020_l._ 10_s._ 5_d._ was charged for

work proved to be worth only 37_l._ 2_s._ 3_d._ At the cooperage at

Plymouth, the king’s casks were stolen, and sixty-four of them were

found in one brewery.”—(p. 183.)

“It was a common expression with the receiving clerks that they ‘_had

not been hampered_,—’ when they refused to receive articles into

store. The ‘hampering’ meant a bribe in the shape of wine or other

articles, as the price of their certificates.”—(p. 155.)

“It would scarcely be believed to what extent peculation was carried

on in every department.”—(p. 155.)

“Hampers of wine and ale were liberally supplied to the inspectors of

timber, and I conclude that the same treatment was applied to the

measuring clerks of the dockyard.”—(p. 179.)

“From the foregoing it may be inferred that the dockyards were the

most fruitful sources of plunder and national ruin.”—(p. 180.)

“Report No. 6 relates to the dockyards, wherein a shameful system of

plunder had long existed.”

“Reports 10 and 11 state other abuses to an enormous extent, so that

Lord St. Vincent used the elegant expression that ‘_our dockyards

stank of corruption_.’”—(p. 190.)

From this disgraceful picture let us pass on to another still more

revolting:—

“The victualling establishment at home was not less corrupt. The

charge for the supply of prisoners of war was ample, but three-fourths

of the amount was pilfered. The same nefarious system pursued in the

hospitals abroad was followed at home in a more guarded manner, and

_fortunes were made_ by cheating the sick and wounded seamen out of

the comforts and necessaries allowed them by a grateful country. Lord

Cochrane endeavoured to procure better rations and treatment for the

French prisoners, but the charge of sick and wounded prisoners of war

fell in its administration into the hands of a set of villains whose

seared consciences were proof against the silent but eloquent

pleadings of their fellow-creatures.”—(p. 165.)

“Report No. 7 relates to the hospitals, beginning with Stonehouse at

Devonport. Here was discovered waste, corruption, fraud, extravagance,

and villany to a disgusting extent. Four thousand gallons of porter

were consumed in six months, being more than four times the proportion

used in Haslar. On board the _Calne_ hulk, appropriated to sick

prisoners of war, the surgeon’s chief assistant kept a table for the

officers at the cost of 1500_l._ or 2000_l._ a year. He could afford

the purser a large salary, in lieu of his share of the profit of the

concern. The worst and most scandalous feature was, that when the

wretches in the wardroom were rioting in luxury they were consuming

the necessaries which the Government had liberally supplied for the

use of the sick prisoners of war.

“I hope there is sufficient virtue in Parliament to punish _great

delinquents_, if not the country will not stagger long under the

practice of these blood-sucking leeches.”—(_Letter of Lord St.

Vincent, quoted by Brenton._)

Abroad the condition of affairs was infinitely worse, both as regarded

the navy and army. The following extract from the “Annual Register,” at

a period when the press hardly dared to speak truth, will serve as a

sample of the practices prevailing wherever an official staff was to be

found:—

“The abuses committed in the West Indies are said to exceed everything

that was ever stated in romance. The commissioners are stated to have

discovered that forged bills and receipts, for articles never

purchased, and bills drawn on Government indorsed under forged and

fictitious names, were common and notorious. They found a most base

collusion between the officers of Government and the merchants and

contractors, by which the latter were allowed to charge stores at a

much higher rate than they might have been obtained for in the market.

In one instance it was discovered, that to conceal this iniquity, a

bribe of 18,000_l._ had been given; in another a bribe of 35,000_l._

Vessels, houses, stores, &c. were usually hired at most extravagant

rates, in consequence of fraudulent contracts, where others might have

been obtained much cheaper. But worse than either of these iniquities

was the diabolical fraud of suffering the merchants and contractors to

furnish His Majesty’s troops with inferior and bad rum, and other

articles, at an extravagant rate, by which the lives of the troops

were endangered, as well as the country defrauded. And, for the

purpose of committing these practices, all free competition for the

supply of articles was prevented; and every obstacle was put in the

way, even of the purchase of bills on the Treasury. They were dated in

one island and negotiated in another; and they were sold at a much

more advantageous exchange than that at which the officers debited

themselves in their accounts.”

There is no doubt but that Lord St. Vincent was desirous of putting a

stop to this national plunder, and the wholesale destruction of sick,

wounded, and prisoners, which was its direct consequence; but the means

he took were inadequate. His lordship’s remedy was “_economy!_” leaving

the influential delinquents in quiet possession of their places. The

most extravagant contracts and profuse expenditure of the public money

were thus to be cured by no expenditure at all on necessary objects.

One of Lord St. Vincent’s agents in this notable scheme, was a Dr.

Baird, who possessed his lordship’s highest confidence. To this person

was confided the task of regenerating the hospitals. As may be supposed,

from his profession, economy in medicine was the first step. An order

was issued that blue ointment and pills, requisite only for complaints

that might be avoided, were doled out in _minimum_ quantity. The

consequence was, that the captains and surgeons of ships of war had to

purchase these essential medicines out of their own pockets! more

especially as a subsequent order was issued that no such complaints,

should be treated in the hospitals!

A more barbarous regulation was enforced, viz, that from the expense of

_lint_ in dressing wounds, _sponge_ should be substituted, as it might

be used over again! The result was that even slight cases became

infected by the application of sponges which had been used on putrescent

sores, and this shameful practice cost the lives or limbs of many. I was

myself on a survey at the Devonport hospital, where seven persons had

lost limbs from this cause! and proposed to the other surveying captains

to draw up a representation to the Admiralty on the consequences of

applying infected sponge; but the advice was not followed for fear of

giving offence.

One of the unfortunate sufferers, amongst others, was a son of the

boatswain or gunner of the then flagship, the _Salvador del Mundo_. The

poor boy had bruised his shin, to which an infected sponge was applied,

and he lost his leg! Persons so mutilated had no claim on the service

for pension or reward. It was this very hospital to which Captain

Brenton, in the preceding extracts, applied the terms “waste,

corruption, fraud, extravagance, and villany to a disgusting extent.”

The remedy was the application of infected sponge!!

Dr. Baird had the oddest possible notions of the mission with which he

was entrusted. As to striking at the root of an evil he had not the most

remote conception, otherwise than by saving. He one day said to me; “The

extravagance of this place is incredible. I have to-day found what will

save one thousand pounds.” “Ah, Doctor,” said I, “what is that?” “Why,”

replied he, “would you believe it, in the cellars under the hospital I

have found tens of thousands of empty physic bottles! Did you ever hear

of such waste!” And the doctor set busily to work to dispose of the

empty bottles in order to pay for his medicines,—this being his idea of

correcting the most crying evil of the hospital.

A still more absurd instance of the doctor’s economy gave rise at the

time to considerable amusement. Everybody knows that a sailor requires

as much looking after as a child. It was Jack’s practice when sick in

hospital, to get out and scale a wall for the purpose of smuggling in

spirits, these of course undoing the little that medical treatment could

effect. To put an end to the practice, the authorities had ordered the

wall to be raised, but Dr. Baird stopped the work, because a coating of

broken glass-bottles on the top of the old wall would be more economical

to the nation and equally effectual! A _chevaux de frise_ of broken

glass was accordingly put on, but, to the doctor’s annoyance, Jack, with

a brickbat, pounded up the broken glass, and got to the spirit shop as

before. Whereupon the doctor declared his belief that “sailors were as

far gone in wickedness as the hospital authorities themselves.”

These were the kinds of reform adopted, the ultimate result being that

Lord St. Vincent was more blamed than had been any of his predecessors,

and was, on quitting the Admiralty, driven to the undignified

alternative of _filing a string of affidavits in the King’s Bench in

defence of his character_![30]

-----

Footnote 30:

See Brenton, vol. ii. p. 356.

-----

Much has been said about the difficulty of manning the Navy, by persons

who had not a knowledge of the arbitrary and cruel practices above

mentioned, and of many others on which it would be tedious to dilate,

but which, under pretence of zeal for the promotion of the service,

rendered the service at that time almost intolerable. No man acquainted

with the facts can wonder that interminable cruises, prohibition to land

in port, constant confinement without salutary change of food, and

consequent disease engendering total debility, should have excited

disgust, and even terror of a sailor’s life; to which may be added, the

condemnation of invalids to harbour-duty, far more severe than duty

afloat, with no chance of escape but by a return to actual service,

where, strange to say, though unfit, such men were again received!

The instances of abuses just given form but a brief outline of the state

of the Navy at that period. From these the reader may imagine the rest.

Suffice it to say, that I used all diligence to store both my memory and

note-book with facts, to be used when I might be able to expose them

with effect.

No opportunity, however, immediately occurring, I betook myself to the

College of Edinburgh, then distinguished by possessing some of the most

eminent professors in the kingdom. In the early part of this volume the

desultory and imperfect education which fell to my lot has been noticed.

It had, nevertheless, sufficed to convince me of the truth of the axiom

that “knowledge is power,” and also to decide that in my case power if

proportioned to knowledge could be of no very high order. It was

therefore my determination to increase both to the best of my ability.

It was, perhaps, an unusual spectacle for a post-captain fresh from the

quarter-deck, to enter himself as a student among boys. For my

self-imposed position I cared nothing, and was only anxious to employ

myself to the best advantage. With what success may be judged from the

fact of my never being but once absent from lectures, and that to attend

the funeral of a near relative.

Whilst at Edinburgh, I made few acquaintances, preferring secluded

lodgings and study without interruption to the gaiety of my

contemporaries. Besides which, if my object of getting into Parliament

were to be accomplished, it was necessary to be economical, since all

that the Admiralty Court had been pleased to leave me of my prize-money

would not more than suffice to satisfy the yearnings of a small borough,

for which the only hope of election was by outbribing my antagonists.

Amongst my contemporaries at the Edinburgh College was Lord Palmerston,

who resided with the most eminent of the then Scotch professors, Dugald

Stewart, and attended the classes at the same time with myself.

I might also mention others, of whose society in after life I should

have been proud, had not the shameful treatment which it was afterwards

my lot to experience from a corrupt faction, driven me from society at a

time when it ought to have afforded me a welcome relaxation from hard

and unintermitting exertions in the service of my country.

CHAP. IX.

EMPLOYMENT IN THE _ARAB_.

APPOINTMENT TO THE ARAB.—PROJECTED INVASION BY NAPOLEON.—THE ARAB

ORDERED TO WATCH THE FRENCH COAST.—THEN TO CRUISE IN THE NORTH

SEA.—RETIREMENT OF LORD ST. VINCENT.

On the renewal of war with France in 1803, application was made by me to

the Admiralty for a ship, first taking the precaution to visit the

various dockyards to see what vessels were ready, or in preparation. My

object was to obtain a suitable vessel, which should enable me to

operate inshore and harass the French coast in the Atlantic, as the

_Speedy_ had done the Spanish coast in the Mediterranean. My success

there formed sufficient warrant for such an application, as, previous to

the Peace of Amiens, the enemy’s coasting trade from Bayonne to Boulogne

had been carried on almost with impunity.

The autobiography of a seaman (volume 1 of 2) · 第 11 / 29 段