PART I.

INTRODUCTION.

[Illustration]

NECESSITY FOR THE STUDY OF STRUCTURAL GEOGRAPHY PREPARATORY TO THE

DRAWING OF MAPS.

The fundamental object in the study of Geography, as we understand it,

is to acquire mental images of the present appearance of the earth’s

surface; its structure, the rocky material of which it is composed, and

the causes and effects of its changes, as a preparation for the home of

organic life.

It is a study of the earth as a material basis for the evolution of man,

and the development of civilization. It leads up to a search for the laws

and workings of the creative forces—forces relating to our planet and to

the sun, the central source of light and heat.

This study has a different meaning to different persons. To one it means

the study of all that lies between the covers of a book, or memorizing

other people’s sayings. To another it means “Connected information

regarding the condition of man’s life on this planet”—again “Geography

is a description of the earth’s surface, or anything that affects or is

affected by it.” A more common definition is, “Geography is a description

of the earth’s surface and its inhabitants.”

An ability to recognize in present environment that which leads to

an understanding of geographical conditions in general, is much to be

desired and is the aim of the teacher of the present day. Geologists

tell us that the same processes are going on now that have ever been in

operation, in the fitting of the earth for the habitation of man. That

these changes are taking place is implied in the very fact that we are

studying the earth’s present appearance.

The study of the history of these changes, and of the nature of the

earthy material as shown in rock and soil, and in vegetation, and of the

influence of heat, light, air and moisture, means the study of all the

natural sciences; not as special isolated studies, but bound together in

one great whole. So closely are they related, merging into and impinging

upon each other as they do, that there seems to be no place or line of

separation between them.

The larger part of the surface of the earth (nearly three-fourths) is

covered with water, and the action of this mighty agent, under the

influence of that great dynamic force and life-giving energy, heat, opens

an immense field for investigation.

These combined influences constitute the study of the environment of all

organic life; and knowing these in a given case, we get an approximate

idea of the stage of development. The development of man, the highest

type of organic life, depends largely upon structural, climatic,

vegetable and animal environment.

To know these is to understand his habits of life, his reasons for choice

of homes, and to judge of his probable advancement in civilization.

The powerful influence which the physical features of the earth’s

surface have exerted in shaping the current of historical events, can

hardly be realized, until thoughtful investigation of the subject

has been made. The knowledge of geographical conditions, as climate,

mountains, valleys, rivers and seas, with vegetable and animal life gives

us the theatre of action for events in history.

As the mere existence of mountain range, desert, sea or river, may

be essentially the influence which has led to the growth or downfall

of empires, it is clearly seen that a sound knowledge of structural

geography is absolutely necessary for all intelligent study of history;

no general relation of important occurrences can be traced without it.

Nearly, if not equally necessary is it in the study of literature. In

order to properly appreciate the works of our best writers, both of prose

and poetry, an acquaintance with nature, a scientific and geographical

knowledge, local and general, is very essential. It forms a basis for

the correct understanding of books, since the best writers and thinkers

of all ages have been students of nature. Their writings are filled

with lessons and illustrations, as well as generalizations drawn from

close observations of her methods. If, then, a knowledge of structural

geography is requisite to the true understanding of man’s relation to

man and the world around him, it becomes important that the subject be

presented in such a manner as to attract and hold the interest of the

pupil; and properly presented there can be nothing more interesting than

the study of his immediate environment—that which touches him in his

every day experience.

This study of his immediate environment is essential to the forming of

mental images of areas and surface forms outside and beyond his sense

grasp and to a comprehension of the structure and surface contour of the

world at large: such mental images being fundamentally a necessity to the

delineation of adequate structural maps of the whole or any part of the

earth’s surface.

NECESSITY FOR FIELD LESSONS AND IMPORTANCE OF FORMING, IN CONNECTION WITH

THEM, A HABIT OF MODELING, PAINTING AND DRAWING.

The study of geography, which in the past consisted mainly in the

memorizing of meaningless names with little or no exercise of the

reasoning faculties, or opportunities for making generalizations through

acts of comparison and inference, has been superseded by instruction of a

more rational order.

We have learned that to memorize names and locations of mountains, rivers

and lakes, without seeing their relation to a whole, or to make only

superficial observations of extended areas of land, results merely in

indefinite mental impressions, leaving out the very basis of all concise

and clearly defined geographical knowledge.

To the end that definite mental images may be acquired, field excursions

under the direction of competent leaders are now advocated, and when

entered upon with an intelligent purpose are held to be indispensable

factors in the correct study of geography.

[Illustration: SECTION OF STREAM SHOWING RAPIDS.]

Under these conditions (the intelligent purpose and the competent

leader), the pupil who visits a lake is likely to have a more adequate

mental image of old ocean, than one who has never seen a lake or other

large body of water. One who has seen low hills with their out-cropping

rock, and the action of small streams upon them, will have a better idea

of what mountains and rivers may be.

In the new education the pupils are thus in the field lesson brought face

to face with nature. Through these lessons the powers of the imagination

are quickened and strengthened by the continual observation of surface

forms, the true basis for all attempts to image the structure of the

earth.

Inferences are made at every step of the way as to the history of the

physical features observed, and the nature of the forces that have acted

upon them to shape and distribute. Areas and forms of land are constantly

being compared as to shape, size, width, length and height, and simple

generalizations, formed from direct observations, are combined with other

generalizations, to form those that are higher or more comprehensive.

This is but a brief suggestion of the part the field lesson bears to

education in general.

In the particular study of geography it must be borne in mind that no

essential knowledge can be gained except through close observation of the

earth’s surface forms. As the true teacher of science in his classes in

botany or zoology leads his pupils to an individual study of plants and

animals, and also to a study of these in their surroundings, their social

relations, so also the student of geography goes directly to nature for

all fundamental knowledge pertaining to the subject.

Field lessons, though conducted mainly as contributing to the student’s

fund of knowledge, are also a source of pleasure, and may be made the

foundation of a more healthful love for and delightful companionship

with nature. They are not alone a mine of knowledge but also a perfect

well-spring of inspiration.

In every stream, plain and valley, new beauties of form and color are

continually presenting themselves. Varying tints of landscape vistas,

drifting cloud masses, softly rounding hills, majestic mountain forms,

the play of sunlight and shadow; all make subtle appeal. Entering into

harmony with creation we are led into harmony with its source.

Everything combined, all the wealth of color, warmth of sunlight, song

of birds, hum of insects and breath of growing things, conspire to the

unfoldment of the being on all the planes of life’s expression, for,

the first and controlling impulse is toward expression; expression on

the physical, mental and emotional planes—in fulfillment of the law of

growth, for expression is a necessity to growth.

_Expression._ Geography has been said to be an analytical study of the

earth’s surface, or the study of the separate landscape elements, such as

form, color and organic structure.

Geography is emphatically a study of form, the forms of the earth’s

surface features, each to be studied in relation to other and contrasting

forms, as well as in relation to their environment.

Upon the pupils’ return from the field, the forms and areas observed

may be modeled in sand, sketched on paper, or chalk modeled on the

blackboard. Maps may be drawn of the areas studied and sketches may be

made in color of stretches of different soils and verdure, together with

the atmospheric effects observed. Tints of sea, sky and cloud, color and

shades of rock and foliage are all speaking in tones which the child may

interpret and render intelligible to others, through the medium of brush

and paints.

It is of great importance to his future growth that the student acquire

the habit of freely expressing himself through the art modes of modeling,

painting and drawing, since much of his mental power depends upon such

expression; for by holding in mind, while in the act of expression, the

images acquired through observation, more of the details of the object or

scene as well as the generalities are recalled.

[Illustration: RIVER BASIN.]

Expression thus reacts upon self, causing the mental picture to be

intensified and expression to become more definite and complete. No

other means are so adequate to this end: _i.e._, the forming of distinct

images in the mind, unless it may be the giving of oral and written

descriptions. These, of course, should be demanded of the pupil as well.

By this demand the pupil sees the necessity of closer observation and

investigation that he may give a fuller and more truthful expression,

and with careful leading he becomes a critic of his own thought and

skill, which is a step pre-eminently educative.

_Aim of Field Lesson._ A direct purpose or aim of the field lesson in

teaching geography should be to form a clear idea or mental picture of a

river basin as a basis for imaging other river basins, and as a unit for

the study of the continent, or of all land surface: and to know the river

basin is to know its history; that is, the history of the river itself,

its valley, and the story of its building and shaping.

It may not be possible for all students to make a study of the whole of

a river or brook basin, yet it may be done by sections—getting a general

idea of the slope of the river bed, water-parting, slope and valley.

The action of the forces of nature may also be seen in the changes now

going on in the different sections—the cutting back of the stream at

its source, its eroding power, its carrying power, and its building or

leveling power.

If it is not possible to take the children to the field for nature study,

they may find fruitful sources of study without.

_City Schools._ Nearly every school-house has some surroundings that may

be studied to advantage, except those in closely built city streets; but

even in such cases there is always the work of rain, heat, frost, and

wind to study, as well as insect life. The drifting of sand and snow, the

frost on the window-panes, the forming of ice around doors and windows

and the effect of heat in its melting, rain-drops, clouds, puddles of

water in the slight depressions of sills and walks, with tiny streams

flowing therefrom, are all to be observed.

Where did the dirt on the windows and sills come from, especially after

some snow-storm? Tiny seeds in the corners where the winds have left

them; insects in the spring;—where did they come from? Where were they

all winter? These and many other hints might be given for such study.

[Illustration: THE CUTTING BACK OF A STREAM AT ITS SOURCE.]

_The country_ furnishes a rich field for investigation. Around every

building and in many localities that can be easily reached, most of the

types of the earth’s surface forms may be found. Care must be taken that

they are considered as _types_, or the pupil might answer the question,

“How high are mountains?” as the child did who said in reply, “Two inches

high.”

In the lower grades of school, much of the geography work should be the

direct lesson in the field followed by lessons in school. The higher

grades, also, should continue the frequent field excursions which are

begun in the lower.

[Illustration: SOURCE OF BROOK IN NEARLY LEVEL COUNTRY.]

Visits may be made to the hills, groves, lakes and ponds of the vicinity,

and upon returning to the school-room, these and surrounding areas may

be modeled in sand or clay, painted in water-color or drawn on the

blackboard.

[Illustration: FARM IN CENTRAL NEW YORK.]

Brook basins may be studied as presenting many if not all of the features

of the river basins. Maps may also be made of these areas, as well as

detailed drawings of special features.

As has been said, the pupil should model and draw continually, in

connection with or after every lesson in the field. It is the very best

method by which to attain mental growth, and should of course, be the

genuine expression of his own mental images gained through observation.

He should model and draw all surface features or areas seen in his

excursions. He may model, in sand, putty or clay, maps of the areas of

the school-yard, farms or parks in the vicinity; or chalk model them,

then indicate upon them the boundaries of any sub-divisions they may

have, such as fields, clumps of trees, houses or other buildings.

[Illustration: MAP SHOWING ITS RELATION TO THE BROOK AND RIVER.]

_Imaginary Areas._ Let the pupil also sketch on the blackboard, imaginary

scenes and typical features of other areas and countries under the same

or contrasting climatic and other conditions; always questioning, as he

draws his mental picture—if of a river, for instance—what is the cause

of its rapidity, what its probable depth and effect on the soil, why it

cuts here or builds there, and why the slopes back of it are terraced as

they are.

If he represents islands, he should ask himself the question why they are

rocky or alluvial; _i.e._, what their origin; and never represent in any

expression that which is contradictory and so untrue to nature.

Landscapes typical of the different zones of temperature, showing

characteristic structure, vegetation, homes, habits and occupations of

inhabitants may be drawn.

Maps, also, of these areas and those adjoining, may be chalk modeled.

As the mind becomes stored with separate images acquired through actual

observation of areas of the earth’s surface, gradually, by the combining

and blending of these, a new mental image, a comprehensive picture is

formed, corresponding in the main to the general features of the whole

earth, with its uplifted masses and lower plains, its natural divisions

of continents, seas and oceans, its atmospheric and climatic conditions.

If the habit has been formed of chalk modeling imaginary areas, as well

as those within the sense grasp, it will be a comparatively easy matter

to chalk model a map of the whole continent. On this the student may mark

the boundaries of all political divisions as he studies them, and locate

the important cities and places of interest.

_Practical Suggestions._ Before we leave the subject of field lessons,

some practical suggestions in regard to them are here offered.

Actual observations may be made on the action and effects of rivers,

underground water, rain, wind, heat and frost.

The effects of glacial action, and the eruptive forces of nature may also

be seen in places.

To study river action it is not necessary to visit a river (if there

be none near); any small stream of water, any tiny rivulet beside the

roadway, tells its story of wearing and building, its vertical cutting

and its swinging from side to side. It has its miniature valley, its

basin and water-parting and possibly a delta at its mouth. It may also

have its cascade or waterfall.

[Illustration: RIVULET SHOWING FALL OF WATER AND DELTA.]

The wearing of rock, through the influence of rain, frost and heat, may

be seen in any stone building, fence or pavement.

Effects of heat and moisture on vegetation, as influencing the growth

of plants and trees, should be noticed. The growth of shrubs and trees

during a dry season can be measured and compared with that of wet seasons.

The observer should mark the effect of vegetation in the action of rain

on a grassy slope—how the grass protects the soil, preventing it from

being washed away, and how, by holding back the water so that it flows

more slowly, it is less destructive in its action.

To add to the interest, the pupil may be led to imagine the effects upon

climate and streams, of the denuding of large areas of their forests;

also how rock sculpturing, in the forming of gorges, cañons, etc., would

be modified by the volume and force of streams.

Observation should also be made on the making of soils, their

constituents and relative proportions of loam, sand, gravel and clay, and

the relation of these to plant and animal life.

The part that the common earth-worm bears in constantly uniting,

enriching and otherwise preparing the soils for the support of vegetable

life, may be seen in many areas. (It has been computed that in one year

several tons of soil are brought up and distributed by them, within an

area of an acre of land.)

A study made of the action of underground water, as shown in common and

intermittent springs, would be full of interesting suggestions.

The effect of glaciers may be seen in part and their tremendous influence

imagined, by the presence of the countless numbers of striated boulders,

pieces of rock and pebbles, which are strewn all over our prairies

hundreds of miles from any mountains which could have been their home.

It is not necessary to witness the devastation of a cyclone in order to

study the effects of wind action. The piling of sand on the sea-shore,

the drifting of snow or the whirling of dust in the street illustrate

this. The observer may notice where the dust blown from the street has

choked and buried the grasses and weeds beside it, and imagine what might

be the fate of forests in the path of encroaching sand-dunes.

[Illustration: SAND-DUNE ON THE SHORE OF LAKE MICHIGAN.]

Pupils may be told of the dunes which travel great distances: that one

way by which this is known is by noting trees and houses that were once

back of the traveling sand-hills and are now in front of them; also tell

of the sites of ancient cities long buried and now being excavated and

brought to light again.

IMPORTANCE OF LEARNING TO INTERPRET PICTURES AS AN AID TO IMAGING THE

CONTINENT.

The ability to image the continent or any part of it, from the reading

of pictures, is of great importance. It is an inexpressible aid to the

imagination in the study of areas that lie outside of the sense grasp.

Good pictures should be chosen: pictures showing several different

views of the same section of a country; pictures that are a truthful

representation of both detail and generalities. (Many wood cuts are as

good as photographs for this purpose. Great care, however, should be

taken that they are faithful transcripts.)

After a close study of them, questions may be asked the pupil as to

climate, structure, nature of rock and soil; whether it may be supposed

to be an arid or fertile region; whether the river basins are young or

old; what agents were most active in shaping its features, and what its

probable destiny: or the pupil may be led to give his own inferences as

to conditions, without direct questioning.

In this way contrasting sections of country may be studied and compared,

thus making the mental picture more vivid and complete.

[Illustration: MAP OF ABYSSINIAN HIGHLAND.

(Drawn from information gained through interpretation of pictures and

written description.)]

It is understood that these mental images gained from such study of

pictures, have as a basis, images acquired from actual observation of the

earth’s surface. From this mental picture, supplemented by images gained

by oral and written descriptions, maps may be chalk modeled which will

contain all the essential features of structure.

[Illustration: YOUNG RIVER BASIN.]

Valuable information for the making of maps has been gained in this way;

indeed, adequate maps cannot be made without this means of acquiring

the necessary knowledge, which the delineator has not been able to gain

through travel and personal investigation.

Through this study or reading of pictures a natural interest is aroused

in the mind of the pupil to see located on the map (that is, to see in

relation to the whole) countries and places of special interest; such as

natural wonders of structure, and remarkable instances of man’s skill

and power in overcoming obstacles and improving his environment.

Especially will this be the case if the teacher accompanies the

descriptions with rapid illustrations on the blackboard.

[Illustration: TEPEE OR WIGWAM OF THE SIOUX INDIANS.]

Necessity for skill in drawing on the part of the teacher, becomes very

evident as the desirability of frequent illustrations is felt, and the

fact is also realized that by it untold influence for good is exerted

over the mind of the pupil. It is an aid to correct mental picturing,

which the teacher cannot afford to omit.

[Illustration: COAST OF ALASKA.

(Showing its drowned valleys caused by the gradual sinking of the land,

also glaciers, Alaskan hut and totem pole.)]

Special features are more readily understood when drawn in detail: as

mountain peaks, stern or forbidding in outline, or lofty and grand

in their mantles of snow and rivers of ice (Mt. Blanc); valleys

with wooded slopes and streams of water; lakes, waterfalls (Niagara

Falls); glaciers and icebergs, with typical scenes of Arctic regions,

including inhabitants with their homes (Muir Glaciers), (Alaskan huts

and totem-poles); deserts and oases, with typical trees and surrounding

objects (palm trees, pyramids, camels); Indian homes and environment;

dykes of Holland, Suez Canal, St. Gothard Tunnel, Great Wall of China,

etc.

[Illustration: THE CHALK MODELED MAP.]

MAPS OF THE PAST AND PRESENT.

As it is impossible to adequately teach the surface features of a country

with only a vague idea of its structure, and with no aids in the form of

pictures, drawing or modelings by which these surface features may be

illustrated, there arises the necessity for maps.

These, to be of any real service, must be a representation of the form

and character of the area which is the subject of study, and must

indicate the relation of part to part, parts to the whole, and the whole

to parts.

As symbols and more than symbols, they must bring to the mind vivid

pictures of the real country or continent, not as too commonly taught;

“A mental picture of the map, so clear and consistent ... that he (the

pupil) can read the answers to all questions concerning it, from his

mental map, as easily as he could from the printed one, if it were before

him.”

This is to limit and cramp the mind’s action, as the pupil sees only

the map and its corresponding concept of map, its size, boundaries and

patches of colored paper. It gives no idea of relation or correspondence

between the map and the actual world of life, form and color.

_Aim of Teacher._ In using maps it should be the aim of teachers

to create in the mind a complete, harmonious picture; the blending

together of the several concepts of structure, climate, drainage, soil,

vegetation, animal life, races of men, etc., corresponding to reality,

or real life in the real world.

_The flat political maps_ of the past made no attempt to show any

structural features except those of horizontal or level plains, markings

which show the locations of mountain ranges and volcanoes, and lines

indicating rivers and outlines of continents or coasts.

These maps have had comparatively little meaning to the young pupil.

There was in them no suggestion of solidity or mass; the contents to him

seemed flat and thin, and confined between coasts which were sharply

defined. Tent-like mountains crossed ghost-like surfaces, and thread-like

rivers were made to zigzag along in an erratic and irresponsible way,

showing to him no reason whatever for their being.

Many teachers or pupils have not known how to interpret maps. They have

not realized that, where rivers rise in certain localities (especially

if more than one rises in the same place), there is a reason for their

rising just there and for their flowing in different directions; that

their source is probably at an elevation or rise of land (called a divide

or water-parting), that there is likely to be more rainfall on the side

of the mountain range that has the more rivers, and that this has a close

relation to the direction of the prevailing winds.

_Natural Boundaries._ In the past study of these maps, outlines of

political divisions have been memorized. It was not realized that many

of the boundaries of those areas were fixed in the beginning by the very

nature of the surface structure, and that they are where they are, simply

because they could not well be anywhere else. (See Mexico, India, Italy.)

[Illustration: MAP OF THE CHICAGO DRAINAGE CANAL.

(With larger map showing its relation to Lake Michigan and the

Mississippi River, also sections in detail.)]

_History._ We have seen that the study of history cannot be successfully

taught without a knowledge of structural geography on the part of

teacher and pupil; so we may say the same of maps, that their use is

of fundamental importance in that study, and the ability to read them

understandingly is as indispensable as it is in the study of geography.

To try to teach history otherwise would be a waste of time and effort.

The habit of locating the events recorded, of tracing upon the map

the route of an army, or the line of an important road or canal, and

observing the impediments or natural obstructions to be overcome, with

the great advantages to be derived therefrom, together with inferences

as to the time and labor required, has the effect of making the study of

history of living interest, especially if the map used indicates such

surface structure.

In the structural map the student readily sees the meaning to commerce of

the cutting of a canal which would unite two large bodies of water, or

the effect the building of roads and bridges across hitherto impassable

regions would have upon the life and growth of a people in the opening

up of new and extensive areas to civilization, and consequently the

development of their own internal resources.

The importance of this habit of usage, or constant reference to the

map, is also recognized when one realizes how it fixes in the memory

not only the location of cities and boundaries of ancient empires, but

the geographical structure and environment associated with their growth

and with important historic events; making plain the reasons for, or

causes why, certain events occurred at certain places, as the inevitable

consequence of their environment.

Light dawns upon the pupil as he studies. He sees that environment has

been an important factor in the development of the human race. He traces

step by step in imagination the growth of civilization, from the time

that man in his nomad stage first drove his herds into the valley in

search of food and water. There, finding the soil productive, water

unfailing in supply, and the valley protected from marauders by natural

barriers, as desert or mountain walls, he fixes his home; in the course

of time comfortable dwellings are constructed, land is cultivated and the

place becomes a center of civilization.

In connection with this train of thought, the student by contrast notes

the far different effects of environment as shown by life in the Arctic

or other regions, and he turns to his map with renewed interest and eager

inquiry.

_Literature._ The habit also of locating on the map every place, natural

feature or country read about, should be cultivated, as it is of

importance in obtaining a correct understanding of an author’s meaning.

If we did not have the knowledge of physical structure in mind as a stage

on which the actors move, much of our literature would lose its value,

becoming flat and uninteresting.

To know the great lake region adds to one’s interest in Longfellow’s

“Hiawatha,” and the tales of the early explorers; and a knowledge of the

Catskills and the geography of the Hudson River valley gives greater zest

to the enjoyment of Irving’s “Rip Van Winkle” and “Sleepy Hollow.”

It is also necessary to the understanding of the stories of Holland

(“Hans Brinker”) that we know the habits of the Hollanders arising from

the physical characteristics of their environment.

To read intelligently Scott, Dickens, George Elliot and others is to

understand the peculiarities of climate and structure of the British

Isles. The old Greek stories and the German Folk Lore as well, demand

for their understanding and interpretation, that we place them not only

in relation to the habits and thoughts of the people, but also to the

physical foundation of the country itself.

_Relief Map._ The nearer a map corresponds in its inherent form and

material, to the surface features of the earth which it is designed to

represent, the more of reality does it recall to the mind. The most

effective map of this kind and the one which corresponds most closely to

the reality is the modeled map of putty or plaster, showing structure in

relief.

These maps have been in use for years, and have been of incalculable

interest and benefit to those whose stock of knowledge concerning

geographical structure had been mainly gathered from the flat political

map and old modes of teaching.

On seeing a relief map of one of the continents for the first time, there

arises a sense of wonder and surprise, and as the realization dawns upon

one of the continuity of the great mass of land represented, with its

altitudes and depressions, and that it is one stupendous aggregation of

soil, rock and vegetation, surrounded by a great expanse of water, a

feeling of awe and astonishment is awakened.

As this new light comes to the student, he looks with interest and

eagerness to see the plan of it all. We do not mean to say that he

sees in the map before him an actual correspondence to the earth’s

surface structure, that is, forms that are reproductions in miniature

of mountain range and valley, but he sees a representation of them

calculated to arouse his imagination to a lively degree. He is enabled

to picture to himself great slopes crowned by lofty mountain peaks,

and the meeting of their lower edges where mighty rivers flow. He sees

in imagination how these waters have cut deep channels into the great

uplifted masses, how they have torn jagged gashes into their rugged sides

as they leaped and tumbled through dark cañons, grinding off rocks that

form sediment constantly to be deposited later on upon the plain below.

He easily understands that they must act as a source of drainage for wet

lands and as channels for the irrigation of dry areas.

In looking upon the great bodies of water, oceans, seas, lakes and gulfs,

as represented on the maps, he questions the relation of these waters

to the land, their depth and what place they fill in the economy of

nature. Indeed, the relief map has an awakening effect, quickening the

imagination and stimulating to mental effort—earnest thought.

They are invaluable in their place and have come to stay; yet on account

of their weight and general unwieldiness they are not practically as

useful as maps which are lighter and more easily handled.

_The papier mache_ maps in relief, although much lighter in weight, are

still very bulky if made large enough to be of much practical use as

wall maps, since they cannot be folded or reduced in size to facilitate

transportation, or removal from room to room.

The best of these, also, are modeled in such low relief that they are

better adapted to the use of pupils in the higher than in the lower

grades. Other maps of rather recent date are the _typographical_ map and

the _contoured_ map. The former shows general altitudes by the use of

shades of color, and is of great value to one who can interpret it, but

only a confused mass of signs and symbols to the young student, and thus

not much more helpful to him than was the old reference map.

In the contoured map, the altitudes are scientifically represented

by lines drawn to an exact scale, and such maps are most valuable to

students of the higher grades.

A structural map suitable to all grades of pupils, the lower as well as

the higher grades, seems highly essential; especially should it be one

that is adapted to the teacher’s use while before the class—one to teach

from. This should be entirely different from a reference map. It should

plainly show the great facts of physical geography or surface structure,

as well as some detail, and this in a simple form. For the lower grades

there should be no lines to mark the political divisions, neither

should there be any names of countries, states, or cities to designate

localities.

Everything should be omitted that would have a tendency to divert the

attention from the chief function of the map which is, to aid in the

formation of a mental picture or image, corresponding to the structural

features of the real country or continent.

_The Chalk Modeled Map._ These maps, following the use of the putty or

plaster relief maps, should be the only ones placed before the pupils

of the third and fourth grades, or even higher grades, until they have

gained mental power to read and understand the signs and symbols of the

map, and realize clearly the chief structural features of the whole globe.

The student should be enabled by the use of maps to picture in his mind

the configuration of the whole earth; the distribution and shape of land

and water surfaces, the great structural division of continents, the

slopes and counter-slopes with their crowned heights and level plains,

the great land masses and river basins, peninsulas, gulfs and bays,

islands and their relation to the mainland.

In fine, the whole world surface should become a reality to him if the

map is rightly taught. This will be an easy matter for a teacher who

is alive to the beauty of the world around us and who has a personal

knowledge or clearly pictured concepts of the real country. Such an one

will readily see the value of the maps as an aid to the pupil in gaining

a comprehensive mental picture of the earth’s surface.

She will remember that the mere placing of the maps before the pupil is

not enough, that they will be as unmeaning to him as the flat political

map, unless he has already in mind the primary concepts acquired through

observation of surface forms, and has made his inference as to cause from

the effects seen.

Of what value will it be to him to know that certain lines indicate a

mountain range or river, unless he has an approximate idea of what a

mountain range or river is?

For the use of the more advanced pupils of the higher grades, who see

the relation of structural environment to man in his development as

a nation, the relation of natural structural divisions to political

divisions, these maps should have lines drawn upon them to indicate the

boundaries of such divisions. Names, also, of countries, mountain and

river systems should be marked, and the large bodies of water of the

interior. Later on, the smaller divisions of states and provinces, gulfs

and bays, lakes and rivers, with their tributaries, should be shown, and

important cities may also be located; in the end, all the data needed as

a reference map.

The map devised to fulfil these conditions, and now in considerable

use in this country, is called the “Chalk Modeled Map.” It is drawn to

represent surface structure in relief, giving much of the effect of an

engraving or photograph of a relief map, yet intrinsically more truthful

and artistic than any such representation could be.

There is an immense difference between this and a drawing from a relief

map, or from a photograph of one. In this map the delineator expresses at

first hand his own concept of the continental structure, as the artist or

poet expresses in his work his own original ideas. We feel his thought in

the very quality of line used. We read how the truths have appealed to

his own consciousness. It stands where the relief map itself stands, as

representing the delineator’s own mental image of such structure.

There are no lines drawn in this map that contradict or confuse the

meaning; all is direct, truthful and clear in statement of fact. Each

line has its own particular meaning. If represents direction. Applied to

land surface, a vertical line means a perpendicular mountain or side wall

of plateau, horizontal lines indicate level areas, and oblique lines a

sloping surface.

Until recently, this map has not been available for general use, except

as each teacher made his or her own. The latter, however, is the ideal

way of teaching. To draw a map of a continent or section of it, as is

required, in order to illustrate or emphasize any particular point before

the class, adds intensely to the interest of the lesson and to the

adequacy of concept gained by the pupil.

Too often, however, the opposite course is pursued. The teacher’s

conceptions of earth structure are perhaps vague, or, teachers may not

have been in the habit of representing by drawings that which they may be

able to picture quite clearly in their own minds, even the desirability

of so doing may not have been entertained by them.

In fact, there are comparatively few who have been persistent enough to

make maps, for though there may be a good knowledge of geography, clear

mental pictures of structure and the ability, also, to draw them, yet

lack of time necessary for their proper delineation has doubtless often

compelled the busy teacher to forego their execution.

_Printed Wall Map._ The Chalk Modeled map has recently been presented to

us in a more durable and serviceable form for general use; a printed wall

map, which combines the latest geographical knowledge together with the

best available skill in delineation.

It does not embody all the desirable points of the original, yet it has

an added one, that of durability.

The introduction of “Nature Study” into the public schools has

contributed largely to the demand for such a map. Pupils brought into

close relations with nature, naturally seek to relate the knowledge

gained in this basic study of geography, to the map; as in connection

with the field lessons, after actual observation of surface areas, the

student is led to model or draw what he has seen. This he represents in

pictorial form, as it appears to him, or he charts or maps it from actual

measurements.

Sometimes he tries to combine these methods so as to show elevations as

altitudes on his map or chart, but the results are often very crude; a

mere representation of hills and mountains piled up on level ground.

He realizes that this is not a proper representation and is often

discouraged. He knows that peaks are related to level ground by

continuity of mass: that they are the corrugated tops of great uplifted

masses or swells of land, and his failure to find this illustrated in the

old maps has led him to lose much of his interest in them, and to greet

the new one with ardor.

It appeals to his reason as a symbol more nearly corresponding to the

features of the country represented. It is indeed the link needed to

connect the political map with the putty relief map.

_Mass Without Outline._ Not only can we say that the Chalk Modeled map

has been a great factor in the better understanding of the surface

contour and conditions of the continental mass, thus advancing the

true study of geography, but that it has also awakened some of the

teachers of the public schools of the country, to the lack of interest

and lifelessness in the teaching of drawing as it has prevailed in the

schools in the past. It has been the means of revealing to them the

beauty and desirability of delineating mass without a continuous hard

outline. The artist when inspired with his subject masses his material in

boldly and each stroke counts for the thing he wants to say—it tells of

the direction of surface, or edge of mass, or detail.

In the new map, the representation of solidity and land continuity as

mass, with no hard and fast limitations of land and water, such as the

outlines so prominent in the old reference maps, is a noticeable feature.

It is a well-known fact that a general or approximate shape of the coasts

of continents is all that can be known from the most careful surveys;

for in reality with every season there is more or less change in coast

line, caused by wearing and building of ocean and river, as well as by

the occasional rising or sinking of stretches of land along the coast. In

course of time these changes become very apparent.

The omitting of outlines of continents, then, in the drawing of maps

has been for a purpose. They have not been necessary to the showing

of limitation of continental mass or the meeting of the surface plane

of water with land surface; and as the direction of all lines used in

delineating have their meaning, there can be truthfully none used to

represent something lying between land and sea, as there is nothing

there. Continental coast contours may be as accurately shown as the

occasion demands without the use of any outline to confuse the eye or to

contradict the direction of line used to delineate the structure of the

land surface at the water’s edge. (See map illustrations in Part IV.)

The most prominent feature of the new map is the representation of the

relief of the earth’s surface; showing, as it does at a glance, the

great back bone of the continent, with its ragged broken line of peaks

dividing the waters of the two slopes; its great land masses, primary and

secondary; and its area or line of greatest depressions. Its river basins

also are plainly seen, and we infer the reason for the general course of

the rivers and read their history from the sculpturing they have done.

We may note also the character of the mountain ranges; whether they are

young or old; where new land is being made, and where areas are sinking.

One can often determine what the prevailing wind of a section may be

and the regions of greatest rainfall, and can judge of the climate and

vegetation; in short, very rational conclusions concerning the life and

habits of a people may be formed from a study of the map alone, and the

student can picture, in imagination, the growth or advancement of nations

under the given conditions.

He will be enabled to see, as has been remarked in substance before, that

the mighty influences bearing upon civilization have always been largely

dependent upon the geographical structure of a country; the relation of

natural divisions to existing political divisions will be noted, and the

reasons for the locations of great centers of commerce, important cities,

and military fortifications, will be understood.

_Altitudes._ In common with all relief maps, altitudes are shown in

these, greatly exaggerated in comparison with the horizontal distances,

but this is essential in order that the pupil may be able to grasp the

_general truths_ of the organization of the continent.

Relief maps in relatively exact proportions will not help to this, as the

highest elevation would appear nearly on a plane with the ocean level,

and would be of no better service for school use than the flat maps,

from which no idea of the general organism can be acquired by the young

student, if indeed it can be by one of riper years.

Also in all topographical surveys, and in the profile of vertical

sections of country found in many geographies, we find the same

exaggeration of height in relation to horizontal distances, used to

illustrate elevations and slopes.

These, with photographs or pictures of relief maps are extensively used,

as well as birds’-eye views, showing on the part of the map-makers, a

recognition of the importance of the pupil’s gaining mental concepts of

altitudes. The latter, of course, must exercise his judgment in relating

the heights, to the horizontal distances given, as he so continually does

in every-day life in regard to other matters.

The horizontal map distances should be related to the other horizontal

distances of the map, and the altitudes to other altitudes, and these

with reference, also, to the tabulated lists found in every geography, of

the heights of mountain peaks and lengths of rivers.

“All knowledge of external things comes through observation, comparison,

and judgment.” To judge of great altitudes, one must have a knowledge of

the heights within experience. To be able to gain a proper conception of

immense distances, as the distance across a continent, comparison must be

made with the distances one has already measured or traveled.

In the measurements of areas, size of fields and gardens, width of ponds,

or heights of trees and hills, the pupil has numerical facts from which

he judges of other forms and areas; as forests, marshes, plains, the

width of rivers and lakes, the heights of mountains and cliffs, or length

of rivers and mountain ranges.

Also in the measuring of the deposition of silt in small streams, he may

judge of the quantity that large rivers like the Mississippi or Nile

must carry; and from measuring the yearly growth of vegetation in his

own climate, he judges what might be the growth in other climates. Thus

through observations, inferences, and comparisons, he is enabled to read

his map with some degree of power to judge its distances and altitudes.

The aim in the preceding pages has been to show the vital importance to

the would-be delineator of Chalk Modeled maps, of the thorough study

of geography, in its truest sense, and that the foundation of such

study lies in the field lesson, with its accompanying expression of the

knowledge gained there, of surface forms, areas and structures.

The habit, also, of modeling and drawing in connection with the study

of geography, is conducive to the wished-for end; _i.e._, an adequate

knowledge and expression, of the surface contour of the continent.

The chalk modeling of maps is in itself the simplest of all modes of

drawing. It may have been inferred from what has been said on the subject

of maps, that drawing them consists merely in showing simple indications

of slopes; short or long, abrupt or gentle, and summits; broken or

rounded, river basins, character of water-partings, valleys, lakes,

rivers and coasts either bold and rocky, or low and alluvial.

It would be as unnecessary for the purposes of geographical instruction,

as it would be impossible, to draw absolutely correct maps of the earth’s

surface.

Each mountain peak cannot be shown, nor every indentation of coast-line,

but the general trend or direction of mountain ranges and rivers, and

more or less of geological structure can be portrayed in a conventional

manner.

It is not difficult to chalk model with reasonable accuracy. The ability

to do this, however, with any degree of rapidity as well as accuracy,

implies, as has just been said, an adequate knowledge of the subject

to be represented. No mere imitation, or acquisition of technique, or

copying of maps, is educational, nor has it any vital relation to the

true study of geography. Like all dead copies, it betrays in itself its

lack of life, or of real knowledge on the part of the delineator.

An instructor whose eyes are open to truth, can generally tell from a

pupil’s representation whether it is the result of his own individual

thought, the expression of his own knowledge of the subject, or the

reflex of another’s thought.

If it is an expression of his own, there will be much revealed in the

touch and in the quality of line itself, that could not be depicted in

form or put into words. The representation, also, will indicate to what

degree the subject has interested and inspired the individual, and how,

with a clear mental image, he has instinctively expressed himself in the

simplest and most direct manner possible with the medium at hand.

In the following pages will be found suggestions as to the method of

chalk modeling, given in the form of a series of lessons; the underlying

principles in the lessons being those on which is based all expression of

thought in every field of study and among all peoples.

The illustrations are not intended to be models for the teacher or pupils

to copy, but are meant to be helps or encouragement to those who desire

and have courage to attempt to express their own mental images.

Busy teachers need only to realize that comparatively little effort is

necessary in order to acquire a certain amount of success, if they have

their subject in hand, that is, if they have an adequate mental image of

the object to be sketched.

It is hoped that such success will prove a strong inducement to a

deep study of the subject of art, and especially to the psychology of

expression.

Lessons in chalk modeling: The new method of map drawing · 第 3 / 4 章