PREFACE.

The triple labour involved in editing three independent works in one

volume will, it is hoped, serve as an excuse for some of the

shortcomings of the present publication. Under the circumstances it has

been impossible to make the work as definitive as might have been the

case with a single text. For example, while I have been able to print

the three existing manuscript texts of King Horn, of the other two

poems, the textual material is not nearly so complete.

The texts, it is hoped, are accurately printed. The credit for this is

due, in large measure, to Dr. Furnivall,--who has read with the MSS. the

proofs of all the British Museum texts,--and to the proof-readers at

Oxford and Cambridge. The notes to King Horn represent a good deal of

labour, and may, I trust, prove useful. The glossary, though not so

complete as that in Wissmann’s excellent critical edition of King Horn,

is intended to fit the volume, and to supply explanation of words and

uses of words not intelligible to ordinary readers of Early English

Texts.

It is my pleasant duty to acknowledge assistance from various quarters.

I am indebted to the libraries of the British Museum and Cambridge

University, and the Bodleian library at Oxford for the use of

manuscripts; also to the Duke of Sutherland for permission to copy the

text of Floris and Blauncheflur from the manuscript in his private

library; also to the Cornell University library for conveniences placed

at my disposal in the preparation of this volume. I must also

acknowledge timely words of advice from Prof. J. M. Hart, notes on

Layamon from Dr. B. S. Monroe, and assistance in proof-reading by Prof.

W. Strunk, jr. But above all I must acknowledge the less apparent work

of Dr. Furnivall in preparing the texts for press, a work the amount of

which one who has not edited for the E.E.T.S. is not likely to realize.

King Horn, Floriz and Blauncheflur, The Assumption of Our Lady · 第 7 / 90 题