MY DEAR FREDERIC,

When you talk of two idle men not taking the trouble to keep up a little

intercourse by letters, you do not, in conscience, reflect upon me; who,

you know, am very active in answering almost by return of post. It is

some six months since you must have got my last letter, full of most

instructive advice concerning my namesake; of whom, and of which, you say

nothing. How much has he borrowed of you? Is he now living on the top

of your hospitable roof? Do you think him the most ill-used of men? I

see great advertisements in the papers about your great Grimsby Railway.

. . . Does it pay? does it pay all but you? who live only on the fine

promises of the lawyers and directors engaged in it? You know England

has had a famous winter of it for commercial troubles: my family has not

escaped the agitation: I even now doubt if I must not give up my daily

two-pennyworth of cream and take to milk: and give up my Spectator and

Athenaeum. I don't trouble myself much about all this: for, unless the

kingdom goes to pieces by national bankruptcy, I shall probably have

enough to live on: and, luckily, every year I want less. What do you

think of my not going up to London this year; to see exhibitions, to hear

operas, and so on? Indeed I do not think I shall go: and I have no great

desire to go. I hear of nothing new in any way worth going up for. I

have never yet heard the famous Jenny Lind, whom all the world raves

about. Spedding is especially mad about her, I understand: and, after

that, is it not best for weaker vessels to keep out of her way? Night

after night is that bald head seen in one particular position in the

Opera house, in a stall; the miserable man has forgot Bacon and

philosophy, and goes after strange women. There is no doubt this lady is

a wonderful singer; but I will not go into hot crowds till another Pasta

comes; I have heard no one since her worth being crushed for. And to

perform in one's head one of Handel's choruses is better than most of the

Exeter Hall performances. I went to hear Mendelssohn's Elijah last

spring: and found it wasn't at all worth the trouble. Though very good

music it is not original: Haydn much better. I think the day of

Oratorios is gone, like the day for painting Holy Families, etc. But we

cannot get tired of what has been done in Oratorios more than we can get

tired of Raffaelle. Mendelssohn is really original and beautiful in

_romantic_ music: witness his Midsummer Night's Dream, and Fingal's Cave.

I had a note from Alfred three months ago. He was then in London: but is

now in Ireland, I think, adding to his new poem, the Princess. Have you

seen it? I am considered a great heretic for abusing it; it seems to me

a wretched waste of power at a time of life when a man ought to be doing

his best; and I almost feel hopeless about Alfred now. I mean, about his

doing what he was born to do. . . . On the other hand, Thackeray is

progressing greatly in his line: he publishes a Novel in numbers--Vanity

Fair--which began dull, I thought: but gets better every number, and has

some very fine things indeed in it. He is become a great man I am told:

goes to Holland House, and Devonshire House: and for some reason or

other, will not write a word to me. But I am sure this is not because he

is asked to Holland House. Dickens has fallen off in his last novel,

{238} just completed; but there are wonderful things in it too. Do you

ever get a glimpse of any of these things?

As to public affairs, they are so wonderful that one does not know where

to begin. If England maintains her own this year, she must have the

elements of long lasting in her. I think People begin to wish we had no

more to do with Ireland: but the Whigs will never listen to a doctrine

which was never heard of in Holland House. I am glad Italy is free: and

surely there is nothing for her now but a Republic. It is well to stand

by old kings who have done well by us: but it is too late in the day to

_begin_ Royalty.

If anything could tempt me so far as Italy, it would certainly be your

presence in Florence. But I boggle about going twenty miles, and _cui

bono_? deadens me more and more.

July 2. All that precedes was written six weeks ago, when I was obliged

to go up to London on business. . . . I saw Alfred, and the rest of the

scavans. Thackeray is a great man: goes to Devonshire House, etc.: and

_his_ book (which is capital) is read by the Great: and will, I hope, do

them good. I heard but little music: the glorious Acis and Galatea; and

the redoubtable Jenny Lind, for the first time. I was disappointed in

her: but am told this is all my fault. As to naming her in the same

Olympiad with great old Pasta, I am sure that is ridiculous. The

Exhibition is like most others you have seen; worse perhaps. There is an

'Aaron' and a 'John the Baptist' by Etty far worse than the Saracen's

Head on Ludgate Hill. Moore is turned Picture dealer: and that high

Roman virtue in which he indulged is likely to suffer a Picture-dealer's

change, I think. Carlyle writes in the Examiner about Ireland: raves and

foams, but has nothing to propose. Spedding prospers with Bacon. Alfred

seemed to me in fair plight: much dining out: and his last Poem is well

liked I believe. Morton is still at Lisbon, I believe also: but I have

not written to him, nor heard from him. And now, my dear Frederic, I

must shut up. Do not neglect to write to me sometimes. Alfred said you

ought to be in England about your Grimsby Land.

_To E. B. Cowell_.

[? 1848.]

Letters of Edward FitzGerald, in Two Volumes. Vol. 1 · 第 181 / 252 题