6. The Highest Man as Lawgiver of the Future.

972.

_The lawgivers of the future._--After having tried for a long time in

vain to attach a particular meaning to the word "philosopher,"--for I

found many antagonistic traits, I recognised that we can distinguish

between two kinds of philosophers:--

(1) Those who desire to establish any large system of values (logical

or moral);

(2) Those who are the _lawgivers_ of such valuations.

The former try to seize upon the world of the present or the past,

by embodying or abbreviating the multifarious phenomena by means of

signs: their object is to make it possible for us to survey, to reflect

upon, to comprehend, and to utilise everything that has happened

hitherto--they serve the purpose of man by using all past things to the

benefit of his future.

The second class, however, are _commanders;_ they say: "Thus shall it

be!" They alone determine the "whither" and the "wherefore," and that

which will be useful and beneficial to man; they have command over the

previous work of scientific men, and all knowledge is to them only

a means to their creations. This second kind of philosopher seldom

appears; and as a matter of fact their situation and their danger is

appalling. How often have they not intentionally blindfolded their

eyes in order to shut out the sight of the small strip of ground which

separates them from the abyss and from utter destruction. Plato, for

instance, when he persuaded himself that "the good," as he wanted it,

was not Plato's good, but "the good in itself," the eternal treasure

which a certain man of the name of Plato had chanced to find on his

way! This same will to blindness prevails in a much coarser form in the

case of the founders of religion; their "Thou shalt" must on no account

sound to their ears like "I will,"--they only dare to pursue their task

as if under the command of God; their legislation of values can only be

a burden they can bear if they regard it as "revelation," in this way

their conscience is not crushed by the responsibility.

As soon as those two comforting expedients--that of Plato and that of

Muhammed--have been overthrown, and no thinker can any longer relieve

his conscience with the hypothesis "God" or "eternal values," the

claim of the lawgiver to determine new values rises to an awfulness

which has not yet been experienced. Now those elect, on whom the

faint light of such a duty is beginning to dawn, try and see whether

they cannot escape it--as their greatest danger--by means of a timely

side-spring: for instance, they try to persuade themselves that their

task is already accomplished, or that it defies accomplishment, or that

their shoulders are not broad enough for such burdens, or that they

are already taken up with burdens closer to hand, or even that this

new and remote duty is a temptation and a seduction, drawing them away

from all other duties; a disease, a kind of madness. Many, as a matter

of fact, do succeed in evading the path appointed to them: throughout

the whole of history we can see the traces of such deserters and their

guilty consciences. In most cases,, however, there comes to such men

of destiny that hour of delivery, that autumnal season of maturity, in

which they are forced to do that which they did not even "wish to do":

and that deed before which in the past they have trembled most, falls

easily and unsought from the tree, as an involuntary deed, almost as a

present.

973.

_The human horizon._--Philosophers may be conceived as men who make

the greatest efforts to _discover_ to what extent man can _elevate_

himself--this holds good more particularly of Plato: how far man's

_power_ can extend. But they do this as individuals; perhaps the

instinct of Cæsars and of all founders of states, etc., was greater,

for it preoccupied itself with the question how far man could be urged

forward in _development_ under "favourable circumstances." What they

did not sufficiently understand, however, was the nature of favourable

circumstances. The great question: "Where has the plant 'man' grown

most magnificently heretofore? In order to answer this, a comparative

study of history is necessary.

974.

Every fact and every work exercises a fresh persuasion over every age

and every new species of man. History always enunciates new truths.

975.

To remain objective, severe, firm, and hard while making a thought

prevail is perhaps the best forte of artists; but if for this purpose

any one have to work upon human material (as teachers, statesmen,

have to do, etc.), then the repose, the coldness, and the hardness

soon vanish. In natures like Cæsar and Napoleon we are able to divine

something of the nature of "disinterestedness" in their work on their

marble, whatever be the number of men that are sacrificed in the

process. In this direction the future of higher men lies: to bear the

greatest responsibilities and not to go to rack and ruin through

them.--Hitherto the deceptions of inspiration have almost always been

necessary for a man not to lose faith in his own hand, and in his right

to his task.

976.

The reason why philosophers are mostly failures. Because among the

conditions which determine them there are qualities which generally

ruin other men:--

(1) A philosopher must have an enormous multiplicity of qualities; he

must be a sort of abbreviation of man and have all man's high and base

desires: the danger of the contrast within him, and of the possibility

of his loathing himself;

(2) He must be inquisitive in an extraordinary number of ways: the

danger of versatility;

(3) He must be just and honest in the highest sense, but profound both

in love and hate (and in injustice);

(4) He must not only be a spectator but a lawgiver: a judge and

defendant (in so far as he is an abbreviation of the world);

(5) He must be extremely multiform and yet firm and hard. He must be

supple.

977.

The really _regal_ calling of the philosopher (according to the

expression of Alcuin the Anglo-Saxon): "_Prava corrigere, et recta

corroborare, et sancta sublimare._"

978.

The new philosopher can only arise in conjunction with a ruling class,

as the highest spiritualisation of the latter. Great politics, the

rule of the earth, as a proximate contingency, the total _lack of

principles_ necessary thereto.

979.

Fundamental concept: the new values must first be created--this remains

_our duty_! The philosopher must be our lawgiver. New species. (How the

greatest species hitherto [for instance, the Greeks] were reared: this

kind of accident must now be _consciously_ striven for.)

980.

Supposing one thinks of the philosopher as an educator who, looking

down from his lonely elevation, is powerful enough to draw long chains

of generations up to him: then he must be granted the most terrible

privileges of a great educator. An educator never says what he himself

thinks; but only that which he thinks it is good for those whom he is

educating to hear upon any subject. This dissimulation on his part

must not be found out; it is part of his masterliness that people

should believe in his honesty, he must be capable of all the means of

discipline and education: there are some natures which he will only be

able to raise by means of lashing them with his scorn; others who are

lazy, irresolute, cowardly, and vain, he will be able to affect only

with exaggerated praise. Such a teacher stands beyond good and evil,

but nobody must know that he does.

981.

We must _not_ make men "better," we must _not_ talk to them about

morality in any form as if "morality in itself," or an ideal kind

of man in general, could be taken for granted; but we must _create

circumstances_ in which _stronger men are necessary,_ such as for

their part will require a morality (or, better still: a bodily and

spiritual discipline) which makes men strong, and upon which they will

consequently insist! As they will need one so badly, they will have it.

We must not let ourselves be seduced by blue eyes and heaving breasts:

_greatness of soul has absolutely nothing romantic about it. And

unfortunately nothing whatever amiable either._

982.

From warriors we must learn: (1) to associate death with those

interests for which we are fighting--that makes us venerable; (2) we

must learn to _sacrifice_ numbers, and to take our cause sufficiently

seriously not to spare men; (3) we must practise inexorable discipline,

and allow ourselves violence and cunning in war.

983.

The _education_ which rears those _ruling_ virtues that allow a man to

become master of his benevolence and his pity: the great disciplinary

virtues ("Forgive thine enemies" is mere child's play beside them),

_and the passions of the creator, must be elevated_ to the heights--we

must cease from carving marble! The exceptional and powerful position

of those creatures (compared with that of all princes hitherto): the

Roman Cæsar with Christ's soul.

984.

We must not separate greatness of soul from intellectual greatness. For

the former involves _independence_; but without intellectual greatness

independence should not be allowed; all it does is to create disasters

even in its lust of well-doing and of practising "justice." Inferior

spirits _must_ obey, consequently they cannot be possessed of greatness.

985.

The more lofty philosophical man who is surrounded by loneliness, not

because he wishes to be alone, but because he is what he is, and cannot

find his equal: what a number of dangers and torments are reserved for

him, precisely at the present time, when we have lost our belief in

the order of rank, and consequently no longer know how to understand

or honour this isolation! Formerly the sage almost sanctified himself

in the consciences of the mob by going aside in this way; to-day

the anchorite sees himself as though enveloped in a cloud of gloomy

doubt and suspicions. And not alone by the envious and the wretched:

in every well-meant act that he experiences he is bound to discover

misunderstanding, neglect, and superficiality. He knows the crafty

tricks of foolish pity which makes these people feel so good and holy

when they attempt to save him from his own destiny, by giving him more

comfortable situations and more decent and reliable society. Yes, he

will even get to admire the unconscious lust of destruction with which

all mediocre spirits stand up and oppose him, believing all the while

that they have a holy right to do so! For men of such incomprehensible

loneliness it is necessary to put a good stretch of country between

them and the officiousness of their fellows: this is part of their

prudence. For such a man to maintain himself uppermost to-day amid

the dangerous maelstroms of the age which threaten to draw him under,

even cunning and disguise will be necessary. Every attempt he makes to

order his life in the present and with the present, every time he draws

near to these men and their modern desires, he will have to expiate as

if it were an actual sin: and withal he may look with wonder at the

concealed wisdom of his nature, which after every one of these attempts

immediately leads him back to himself by means of illnesses and painful

accidents.

986.

_"Maledetto colui_

_che contrista, un spirto immortal!"_

MANZONI (_Conte di Carmagnola,_ Act II.)

987.

The most difficult and the highest form which man can attain is the

most seldom successful: thus the history of philosophy reveals a

superabundance of bungled and unhappy cases of manhood, and its march

is an extremely slow one; whole centuries intervene and suppress what

has been achieved: and in this way the connecting-link is always made

to fail. It is an appalling history, this history of the highest men,

of the sages.--What is most often damaged is precisely the recollection

of great men, for the semi-successful and botched cases of mankind

misunderstand them and overcome them by their "successes." Whenever

an "effect" is noticeable, the masses gather in a crowd round it;

to hear the inferior and the poor in spirit having their say is a

terrible ear-splitting torment for him who knows and trembles at the

thought, that the fate of man depends upon the success of its highest

types. From the days of my childhood I have reflected upon the sage's

conditions of existence, and I will not conceal my happy conviction

that in Europe he has once more become possible--perhaps only for a

short time.

988.

These new philosophers begin with a description of a systematic order

of rank and difference of value among men,--what they desire is, alas

precisely the reverse of an assimilation and equalisation of man: they

teach estrangement in every sense, they cleave gulfs such as have

never yet existed, and they would fain have man become more evil than

he ever was. For the present they live concealed and estranged even

from each other. For many reasons they will find it necessary to be

anchorites and to wear masks--they will therefore be of little use

in the matter of seeking for their equals. They will live alone, and

probably know the torments of all the loneliest forms of loneliness.

Should they, however, thanks to any accident, meet each other on the

road, I wager that they would not know each other, or that they would

deceive each other in a number of ways.

989.

"Les philosophes ne sont pas faits pour s'aimer. Les aigles ne volent

point en compagnie. Il faut laisser cela aux perdrix, aux étourneaux

... Planer au-dessus et avoir des griffes, voila le lot des grands

génies."--GALIANI.

990.

I forgot to say that such philosophers are cheerful, and that they

like to sit in the abyss of a perfectly clear sky: they are in need of

different means for enduring life than other men; for they suffer in

a different way (that is to say, just as much from the depth of their

contempt of man as from their love of man).--The animal which suffered

most on earth discovered for itself _--laughter._

991.

_Concerning the misunderstanding of "cheerfulness."_ --It is a

temporary relief from long tension; it is the wantonness, the

Saturnalia of a spirit, which is consecrating and preparing itself for

long and terrible resolutions. The "fool" in the form of "science."

992.

The new order of rank among spirits; tragic natures no longer in the

van.

993.

It is a comfort to me to know that over the smoke and filth of human

baseness there is a _higher and brighter_ mankind, which, judging from

their number, must be a small race (for everything that is in any way

distinguished is _ipso facto_ rare). A man does not belong to this race

because he happens to be more gifted, more virtuous, more heroic, or

more loving than the men below, but because he is _colder, brighter,

more far-sighted, and more lonely;_ because he endures, prefers, and

even insists upon, loneliness as the joy, the privilege, yea, even the

condition of existence; because he lives amid clouds and lightnings as

among his equals, and likewise among sunrays, dewdrops, snowflakes,

and all that which must needs come from the heights, and which in its

course moves ever from heaven to earth. The desire to look aloft is not

our desire.--Heroes, martyrs, geniuses, and enthusiasts of all kinds,

are not quiet, patient, subtle, cold, or slow enough for us.

994.

The absolute conviction that valuations above and below are different;

that innumerable experiences are wanting to the latter: that when

looking upwards from below misunderstandings are necessary.

995.

How do men attain to great power and to great tasks? All the virtues

and proficiences of the body and the soul are little by little

laboriously acquired, through great industry, self-control, and keeping

one's self within narrow bounds, through a frequent, energetic, and

genuine repetition of the same work and of the same hardships; but

there are men who are the heirs and masters of this slowly acquired

and manifold treasure of virtues and proficiences because, owing

to happy and reasonable marriages and also to lucky accidents, the

acquired and accumulated forces of many generations, instead of being

squandered and subdivided, have been assembled together by means of

steadfast struggling and willing. And thus, in the end, a man appears

who is such a monster of strength, that he craves for a monstrous

task. For it is our power which has command of us: and the wretched

intellectual play of aims and intentions and motivations lies only in

the foreground--however much weak eyes may recognise the principal

factors in these things.

990.

The sublime man has the highest value, even when he is most delicate

and fragile, because an abundance of very difficult and rare things

have been reared through many generations and united in him.

997.

I teach that there are higher and lower men, and that a single

individual may under certain circumstances justify whole millenniums of

existence --that is to say, a wealthier, more gifted, greater, and more

complete man, as compared with innumerable imperfect and fragmentary

men.

998.

Away from rulers and rid of all bonds, live the highest men: and in the

rulers they have their instruments.

999.

_The order of rank:_ he who _determines_ values and leads the will of

millenniums, and does this by leading the highest natures--he _is the

highest man._

1000.

I fancy I have divined some of the things that lie hidden in the soul

of the highest man; perhaps every man who has divined so much must go

to ruin: but he who has seen the highest man must do all he can to

make him _possible._ Fundamental thought: we must make the future the

standard of all our valuations--and not seek the laws for our conduct

behind us.

1001.

Not "mankind," but _Superman_ is the goal!

1002.

"Come l'uom s'eterna...."--_Inf._ xv. 85.

The Will to Power: An Attempted Transvaluation of All Values. Book III and IV · 第 82 / 89 题