I hardly dare think how she lived after this. With every Christmas there

was a short period of prosperity, though it dwindled as the tenants

began to realize where their money went. For a time J. and I got her to

keep our bicycles, other people in the house followed suit, and during

several months she was paid rent for as many as six, keeping them in the

empty sitting-room from which even the rickety chairs had disappeared,

and where the floor now was thick with grease and stained with oil. If

we had trunks to store or boxes to unpack, she would let us the same

room for as long as we wanted, and so she managed, one way or the other,

by hook or by crook. But it was a makeshift existence, all the more so

when her habits began to tell on her physically. She was ill half the

time, and by the end of her fourth year in the house, I do not believe

she could have sewed or waited or cooked, had she had the chance. She

had no friends, no companions, save her cat. They were a grim pair, she

with hungry, shifty eyes glowing like fires in the pallor of her face,

he more gaunt and ungainly than ever: for a witch and her familiar they

would have been burnt not so many hundred years ago.

Then we heard that she was taking in lodgers, that women with the look

of hunted creatures stole into her rooms at strange hours of the night.

Some said they were waifs and strays from the "Halls," others that they

were wanderers from the Strand; all agreed that, whoever they were, they

must be as desperately poor as she, to seek shelter where the only bed

was the floor. Much had been passed over, but I knew that such lodgers

were more than landlord and tenants could endure, and I had not to be a

prophet to foresee that the end was approaching.

It came more speedily than I thought, though the manner of it was not

left to landlord and tenants. Christmas, her fifth in the house, had

filled her purse again. Tenants were less liberal, it is true, but she

must have had at least five or six pounds, to which a turkey and plum

pudding had been added by our neighbour across the hall, who was of a

generous turn. She had therefore the essentials of what passes for a

merry Christmas, but how much merriment there was in hers I had no way

of telling. On holidays in London I keep indoors if I can, not caring to

face the sadness of the streets or the dreariness of house-parties, and

I did not go downstairs on Christmas Day, nor on Boxing Day which is the

day after. Mrs. Haines, if she came up, did not present herself at our

chambers. I trust she was gay because, as it turned out, it was her last

chance for gaiety at this or any other season. In the middle of the

night following Boxing Day she was seized with one of her mysterious

attacks. A lodger was with her, but, from fright, or stupidity, or

perhaps worse, called no one till dawn, when she rang up the housekeeper

next door and vanished. The housekeeper next door went at once for the

doctor who attends to us all in the Quarter. It was too late. Mrs.

Haines was dead when he reached the house.

Death was merciful, freeing her from the evil fate that threatened, for

she was at the end of everything. She went out of the world as naked as

she came into it. Her rooms were empty, there was not so much as a crust

of bread in her kitchen, in her purse were two farthings. Her only

clothes were those she had just taken off and the few rags wrapped about

her for the night. Destitution could not be more complete, and the

horror was to find it, not round the corner, not at the door, but in the

very house, and, worse, to know that it deserved no pity. As she had

sown, so had she reaped, and the grave was the kindliest shelter for the

harvest.

The day after, her sister appeared, from where, summoned by whom, I do

not know. She was a decent, serious woman, who attended to everything,

and when the funeral was over, called on all the tenants. She wanted,

she told me, to thank us for all our kindness to her sister, whom

kindness had so little helped. She volunteered no explanation, she only

sighed her regrets. She could not understand, she said.

Nor could I. No doubt, daily in the slums, many women die as destitute.

But they never had their chance. Mrs. Haines had hers, and a fair one

as these things go. Her tragedy has shaken my confidence in the

reformers to-day who would work the miracle, and, with equal chances for

all men, transform this sad world of ours into Utopia.

_Our Beggars_

[Illustration: CLEOPATRA'S NEEDLE FROM OUR WINDOWS]

VIII

OUR BEGGARS

I know our Beggars by their ring. When the front door-bell is pulled

with insolent violence, "That," I say to myself, "is a Beggar," and I am

usually right.

Ours are not the Beggars of whose decay Elia complained; though he could

not have believed that the art of begging was in any more danger of

being lost than the art of lying. His sort have still their place at the

crowded crossing, at the corners of streets and turnings of alleys--they

are always with us. I rarely go out that I do not meet the cripple who

swings himself along on his crutches through the throngs at Charing

Cross, or the blind man who taps his way down the Strand, or the

paralytic in her little cart close to St. Martin's, and I too should

complain were they to disappear. These are Beggars I do not mind. They

have their picturesque uses. They carry on an old tradition. They are

licensed to molest me, and their demands, with their thanks when I give

and their curses when I do not, are the methods of a venerable and

honoured calling. Besides, I can escape them if I choose. I can cross

the street at the approach of the cripple, I can dodge the blind man, I

can look away as I pass the paralytic, and so avoid the irritation of

giving when I do not want to or the discomfort of hearing their opinion

of me when I refuse. But to our Beggars I do object, and from them there

is no escape. They belong to a new species, and have abandoned the

earlier methods as crude and primitive. They make a profession neither

of disease nor of deformity, but of having come down in the world. They

scorn to stoop to "rags and the wallet," which they have exchanged for a

top hat and frock coat. They take out no license, for they never beg in

the streets; instead, they assault us at our door, where they do not ask

for alms but claim the gift, they call a loan, as their right. They are

bullies, brigands, who would thrust the virtue of charity upon us, and

if, as the philosopher thinks, it is a test of manners to receive, they

come out of it with dignity, for their fiction of a loan saves them, and

us, from the professional profuseness of the Beggar's thanks.

It was only when I moved into chambers in the Quarter that they began to

come to see me. Hitherto, my life in London had been spent in lodgings,

where, if I was never free from Beggars in the form of those intimate

friends who are always short of ten pounds to pay their rent or ten

shillings to buy a hat, it was the landlady's affair when the Beggars

who were strangers called.

Chambers, however, gave me a front door at which they could ring and an

address in the Directory in which they could find out where the door

was; and had my object been to make a study of them and their manners, I

could not have hit upon a better place to collect my material.

Not that Beggars are encouraged in the Quarter, where more than one

society devoted to their scientific suppression has, or has had, an

office, and where the lady opposite does not wait for science, but sends

them flying the minute she catches them in our streets. The man who

loafs in front of our club, and who opens cab-doors for members, and as

many more as he can capture, might be mistaken for a Beggar by anybody

who did not know the Quarter, but we who do know it understand that he

is loafing by special appointment. The small boy who has lately taken to

selling his single box of matches on our Terrace does so officially, as

the brass label on his arm explains. And nothing could be more

exceptional than the cheerful person who the other day reeled after the

Publisher and myself into one of our houses where there is an

elevator--for to elevators we have come in the Quarter--the thin end of

the modern wedge that threatens its destruction--and addressed the

Publisher so affectionately as "Colonel" that we both retreated into the

elevator and pressed the button for the top floor.

But the Beggars we keep off our streets, we cannot keep from our front

doors. J. and I had hardly settled in chambers before we were besieged.

People were immediately in need of our help who up till then had managed

without it, and to our annoyance they have been in need of it ever

since. They present themselves in so many different guises, by so many

different methods, that it is impossible to be on our guard against them

all. Some sneak in with the post, and our correspondence has doubled in

bulk. Dukes, Earls, Marquises, Baronets, favour us with lithographed

letters, signing their names at the bottom, writing ours at the top, and

demanding our contribution to charities they approve, as the price of so

amazing a condescension. Ladies of rank cannot give their benevolent

balls and banquets unless we buy tickets, nor can they conceive of our

dismissing their personal appeal. Clergymen start missions that we may

finance them, bazaars are opened that we may fill the stalls with the

free offering of the work by which we make our living, and albums are

raffled that we may grace them with our autographs. We might think that

the post was invented for the benefit of people whose idea of charity is

to do the begging and get us to do the giving. Many of our Beggars like

better to beg in person: sometimes as nurses with tickets to sell for a

concert, or as Little Sisters of the Poor--whom I welcome, having

preserved a sentiment for any variety of cap and veil since my own

convent days; sometimes as people with things to sell at the biggest

price, that we would not want at the lowest, or with patent inventions

that we would not take as a gift, and who are indignant if we decline to

be taxed for the privilege of not buying or subscribing. But the most

numerous of our Beggars, the most persistent, the most liberal in their

expectations, are the men, and more occasionally the women, who, having

come down in the world, look to us to set them up again, and would be

the first to resent it if our generosity ran to any such extravagant

lengths.

Their patronage of the Quarter is doubtless due, partly to its being

close to the Strand, which is an excellent centre for their line of

business; partly to a convenient custom with us of leaving all street

doors hospitably open and inscribing the names of tenants in big gilt

letters on the wall just inside; partly to the fact that we are not five

minutes from a Free Library, where they can agreeably fill their hours

of leisure by the study of "Who's Who," "The Year's Art," and other

books in which publishers obligingly supply the information about us

which to them is as valuable an asset as a crutch to the cripple or a

staff to the blind. Provided by the Directory with our address, they may

already know where to look us up and how to establish an acquaintance by

asking for us by name at our door; but it is this cramming in the facts

of our life that enables them to talk to us familiarly about our work

until acquaintance has ripened into intimacy and the business of begging

is put on a personal and friendly footing. Great as is the good which

Mr. Carnegie must have hoped to accomplish by his Free Libraries, even

he could have had no idea of the boon they might prove to Beggars and

the healthy stimulus to the art of begging which they develop.

In the beginning our Beggars had no great fault to find with us. Their

frock coats and top hats, signs of real British respectability, carried

them past the British porter and the British servant. When they crossed

our threshold, some remnant of the barbarous instinct of hospitality

compelled us to receive them with civility, if not with cordiality. We

never went so far as, with the Spaniard, to offer them our house and all

that is in it, another instinct warning us how little they would mind

taking us at our word; nor did hospitality push us to the extreme of

being hoodwinked by their tales. But in those days we seldom let them go

without something, which was always more than they deserved since they

deserved nothing. If there is such a thing as a Beggar's Baedeker, I am

sure our chambers were specially recommended in earlier editions. In

justice, I must confess that they gave us entertainment for our money,

and that the very tricks of the trade were amusing--that is, while the

novelty lasted. We liked the splendid assurance of their manner; the

pretended carelessness with which a foot was quickly thrust through the

opening of the door so they could be shut out only by force; the

important air with which they asked for a few minutes' talk; the

insinuating smile with which they presumed that we remembered them;

their cool assumption that their burden was ours, and that the kindness

was all on their side for permitting us the privilege of bearing it. And

we liked no less their infinite trouble in inventing romances about

themselves that Munchausen could not have beaten, their dramatic use of

foggy nights and wild storms, their ingenuity in discovering a bond

between us, and their plausibility in proving why it obliged us to meet

their temporary difficulties which were never of course of their own

making. Nor could we but admire their superiority to mere charity, their

belief in the equal division of wealth, their indifference as to who did

the work to create the wealth so long as they did not do it themselves,

and their trust in the obligation imposed by a craft in common. Had they

bestowed half the pains in practising this craft that they squandered in

wheedling a few shillings from us on the strength of it, they must long

since have been acknowledged its masters.

The first of our Beggars, whom I probably remember the better because he

was the first, flattered me by introducing himself as a fellow author

at a time when I had published but one book and had won by it neither

fame nor fortune. What he had published himself he did not think it

worth while to mention, but the powers of imagination he revealed in his

talk should have secured his reputation in print. I have rarely listened

to anybody so fluent, I could not have got a word in had I wanted to. It

never seemed to occur to him that I might not be as bent upon listening

to his story as he upon telling it. He made it quite a personal matter

between us. I would understand, he said, and the inference was that

nobody else could, the bitterness of his awakening when the talented

woman whom he had revered as the kindliest of her sex betrayed herself

to him as the most cruel. For long, in her Florentine villa, he had been

Secretary to Ouida, whom he found so charming and considerate that he

could only marvel at all the gossip about her whims and fancies. Then,

one morning, he was writing a letter at her dictation and by oversight

he spelt disappointment with one p, a trifling error which, as I knew,

any gentleman or scholar was liable to. She flew into a rage, she

turned him out of the villa without hearing a word, she pursued him into

the garden, she set her dogs--colossal staghounds--on him, he had to run

for his life, had even to vault over the garden gate, I could picture to

myself with what disastrous consequences to his coat and trousers. And

she was so vindictive that she would neither send him his clothes nor

pay him a penny she owed him. He had too fine a sense of gallantry to go

to law with a lady, he dared not remain in Florence where the report was

that he went in danger of his life. There was nothing to do but to

return to England, and--well--here he was, with a new outfit to buy

before he could accept the admirable position offered to him, for he had

not to assure me that a man of his competency was everywhere in demand;

it was very awkward, and--in short--he looked to me as a fellow author

to tide him over the awkwardness. I can laugh now at my absurd

embarrassment when finally he came to a full stop. I did not have to

wait for his exposure in the next number of "The Author" to realize that

he was "an unscrupulous impostor." But I was too shy to call him one to

his face, and I actually murmured polite concern and "advanced" I have

forgotten what, to be rid of him.

Out of compliment to J., our Beggars pose as artists no less frequently

than as authors. If the artist himself, when accident or bad luck has

got him into a tight place, likes best to come to his fellow artist to

get him out of it, he is the first to pay his debts and the first debt

he pays is to the artist who saw him through. But this has nothing to do

with our Beggars who have chosen art as an unemployment and with whom

accident or bad luck is deliberately chronic. They look upon art as a

gilt-edged investment that should bring them in a dividend, however

remote their connection with it. According to them, an artist entitles

all his family, even to the second and third generation, to a share in

J.'s modest income, though J. himself is not at all of their manner of

thinking. Grandsons of famous wood-engravers, nephews of editors of

illustrated papers, cousins of publishers of popular magazines, fathers

of painters, brothers, sons, and uncles of every sort of artist, even

sisters, daughters, and aunts who take advantage of their talent for

pathos and "crocodile wisdom of shedding tears when they should

devour,"--all have sought to impress upon him that the sole reason for

their existence is to live at his expense. He may suggest meekly that he

subscribes to benevolent institutions and societies founded for the

relief of artists and artists' families in just their difficulties. They

are glib in excuses for making their application to him instead, and

they evidently think he ought to be grateful to them for putting him in

the way of enjoying the blessing promised to those who give.

The most ambitious reckon their needs on a princely scale, as if

determined to beg, when they have to, with all their might. One artist,

distinguished in his youth, writes to J., from the Cafe Royal where, in

his old age, he makes a habit of dining and finding himself towards

midnight ridiculously without a penny in his pocket, an emergency in

which a five-pound note by return of messenger will oblige. Another,

whose business hours are as late, comes in person for a "fiver," his

last train to his suburban home being on the point of starting and he as

ridiculously penniless, except for a cheque for a hundred pounds just

received from a publisher, which he cannot change at that time of night.

The more humble have so much less lavish a standard that half a crown

will meet their liabilities, or else a sum left to the generosity of the

giver. A youth, frequent in his visits, never aspires above the fare of

a hansom waiting below, while a painter of mature years appears only on

occasions of public rejoicing or mourning when there is no telling to

what extent emotion may loosen the purse strings. Some bring their

pictures as security, or the pictures of famous ancestors who have

become bewilderingly prolific since their death; some plead for their

work to be taken out of pawn; some want to pose in a few days, and these

J. recommends to the Keeper of the Royal Academy; and some are so subtle

in their argument that we fail to follow it. We are still wondering what

could have been the motive of the excited little man who burst in upon

J. a few days ago with a breathless inquiry as to how much he charged

for painting polo ponies for officers, and who bolted as precipitately

when J. said that he knew nothing about polo, and had never painted a

pony in his life. But for sheer irrelevance none has surpassed the

American whom, in J.'s absence, I was called upon to interview, and who

assured me that, having begun life as an artist and later turned model,

he had tramped all the way from New Orleans to New York and then worked

his way over on a cattleship to London with no other object in view than

to sit to J. If I regret that my countrymen in England borrow the trick

of begging from the native, it is some satisfaction to have them excel

in it. When I represented to the model from New Orleans that J., as far

as I could see, would have no use for him, he was quite ready to take a

shilling in place of the sitting, and when I would not give him a

shilling, he declared himself repaid by his pleasant chat with a

compatriot. He must have thought better of it afterwards and decided

that something more substantial was owing to him, for three weeks later

his visit was followed by a letter:--

MADAM,--I know how sorry you will be to hear that since my little

talk with you I have been dangerously sick in a hospital. The

doctors have now discharged me, but they say I must do no work of

any kind for ten days, though an artist is waiting for me to sit to

him for an important picture. They advise me to strengthen myself

with nourishing food in the meanwhile. Will you therefore please

send me

3 dozen new-laid eggs

1 lb. of fresh butter

1 lb. of coffee

1 lb. of tea

2 lbs. of sugar

1 dozen of oranges.

Thanking you in advance,

I am, Madam,

Gratefully yours.

There are periods when I am convinced that not art, not literature, but

journalism is the most impecunious of the professions, and that all

Fleet Street, to which the Quarter is fairly convenient, must be out of

work. It is astonishing how often it depends upon our financial backing

to get into work again, though dependence could not be more misplaced,

for a certain little transaction with a guileless youth whose future

hung on a journey to Russia has given us all the experience of the kind,

or a great deal more than we want. As astonishing is the number of

journalists who cherish as their happiest recollections the years they

were with us on the staff of London, New York, or Philadelphia papers

for which we never wrote a line. One even grew sentimental over the

"good old days" on the Philadelphia "Public Ledger" with J.'s father

who, to our knowledge, passed his life without as much as seeing the

inside of a newspaper office. But the journalist persisted until J.

vowed that he never had a father, that he never was in Philadelphia,

that he never heard of the "Ledger": then the poor man fled.

Astonishing, too, is the count they keep of the seasons. Disaster is

most apt to overtake them at those holiday times when Dickens has taught

that hearts are tender and purses overflow. For them Christmas spells

catastrophe, and it has ceased to be a surprise to hear their ring on

Christmas Eve. As a rule, a shilling will avert the catastrophe and

enable them to exchange the cold streets for a warm fireside, hunger for

feasting, though I recall a reporter for whom it could not be done under

a ticket to Paris. The Paris edition of the "New York Herald" had

engaged him on condition that he was in the office not later than

Christmas morning. He was ready to start, but--there was the ticket,

and, for no particular reason except that it was Christmas Eve, J. was

to have the pleasure of paying for it.

"Why not apply to the 'New York Herald' office here?" J. asked.

The reporter beamed: "My dear sir, the very thing, the very thing. Why

didn't I think of it before? I will go at once. Thank you, sir, thank

you!"

He was back in an hour, radiant, the ticket in his hand, but held tight,

so that just one end showed, as if he was afraid of losing it. "You see,

sir, it was the right tip, but I must have some coffee at Dieppe, and I

haven't one penny over. I can manage with a shilling, sir, and if you

would be so kind a couple more for a cab in Paris."

He did not know his man. J. would go, or rather he has gone, without

breakfast or dinner and any distance on foot when work was at stake. But

the reporter was so startled by the suggestion of such hardships for

himself that he dropped the ticket on the floor, and before he could

snatch it up again J. had seen that it was good not for Paris, but for a

'bus in the Strand.

Our House and London out of Our Windows · 第 10 / 15 段