Hence:--

That particular form of mental life which rejects in principle what

is not perceptible to sense, thereby of necessity is confined to

the re-actual world. If it seeks to encroach upon actual processes,

it must arbitrarily leave out of consideration that in them which

is _essential_, the forces at work in them,--whereby it falls into

absurdities that speedily take their revenge by raising problems that

are insoluble.

This form of mental life is universally called “_science_,” whereby,

it must be admitted, the more or less active counter-currents--those

of the teleological conception of things--are passed over unnoticed.

Science, properly speaking, is always _materialistic_, and its

conception of the play of world-events always strictly _mechanical_.

For it the adequate cause of each occurrence is simply another

occurrence. Adequate causes remain perceptible to sense.

Opposite to it stands faith.

Faith is that particular form of mental life which recognizes an

“imperceptible to sense in itself,” _i.e._ _believes_, and so doing,

assumes a universal “adequate cause in itself” for the entire play of

world-events. From this it follows that the living processes are the

true province of all faith. In them alone are actual forces, _i.e._

that which is imperceptible to sense, actively at work.

As soon as faith seeks to make use of its intuition, _i.e._ seeks

to supply a world-view, it finds itself in the same predicament as

science. Just as this latter, as world-theory, is obliged to read the

actual processes according to the scheme of the re-actual, so faith as

world-theory is obliged to read the re-actual processes according to

the scheme of the actual; in other words, it must represent the world,

even to the extent that it represents itself as purely a falling, as

guided by a divine force. Here not a hair can drop from my head, not

a stone fall to the ground, without a divine decree having taken an

active part therein as adequate cause, an idea which, thought out,

leads to the absurdity of the doctrine of predestination, with which

doctrine faith robs herself of the possibility of her own existence.

For, where there is predestination, there is no free will; where there

is no free will there is no soul; and where there is no soul there is

no God.

That which, in being thought out, deprives itself of the possibility of

existence is contrary to sense, and as such, a nescience, like illusion

and error.

Between and raised above both these opposed positions stands the Buddha.

Buddhism & science · 第 27 / 90 题