That some of these people were Irish seems beyond doubt, particularly

when we find such distinctive Irish Christian names as Darby, Malachi,

Patrick, Brian, Cormac, Connor and the like. And when we see O’Bryan

Smiths, Patrick Smiths, and Michael and Jeremiah Smiths, and other

similar name combinations, we can safely assume that in the majority of

cases they were of Irish origin or birth.

MEMORIAL TO JERSEY PRISON SHIP HEROES.

Since many prominent Irish Americans played an important part in the

success of the project for a fitting memorial to the heroes of the

British prison-ships of the Revolution, it is fit that reference be made

here to this noble tribute and the manner of its accomplishment.

The magnificent monument, costing in the neighborhood of $200,000, was

dedicated at Fort Greene Park, Borough of Brooklyn, New York, on

November 14, 1908, in the presence of one of the most distinguished and

representative gatherings which ever honored a like occasion in this

country. Addresses were made by President-elect Taft, by Governor Hughes

of New York, Secretary Luke E. Wright of the Navy, and by other

distinguished men, including Patrick F. McGowan, Chairman of the Board

of Aldermen of the City of New York, and Daniel F. Cohalan, Grand Sachem

of the Tammany Society of New York, an organization which did much

toward the success of the project and which contributed a substantial

amount.

The monument itself is one of the finest memorials in the world. It

stands in the center of a broad plaza, reached by three flights of 34

steps each, 100 feet in width. The height from the bottom of the plaza

to the top of the monument is nearly 200 feet. The top is accessible and

is reached by an electric elevator. The monument is constructed of white

granite from New York state, and the steps from granite quarried at

Stonington, Penobscot Bay, Maine. The architects were McKim, Mead and

White, and the work is said to have been the last of an extensive nature

by the late Stanford White.

The funds for the erection of this noteworthy tribute were obtained

through a government appropriation of half the amount, a state

appropriation of $25,000, an appropriation by the city of twice that

amount, and the rest through subscriptions from societies and historical

and patriotic organizations. The Tammany Society contributed the final

$1,000 to complete the required amount. This well-known organization was

the very first to secure a proper recognition of the courage and

patriotism of the prison ship martyrs more than one hundred years ago.

Among the heroes of the British prison-ships were many of Irish birth or

extraction, and it is therefore a subject for pride and satisfaction to

us as a race that their valor has at last been recognized, and

especially that an organization largely controlled by our people has

played so important a part in the accomplishment of such recognition.

Never in the history of the world have prisoners of war been made the

victims of such unexampled cruelties as those practised on the Americans

by the British in the Revolution, and it is a striking and

never-to-be-forgotten commentary on British methods toward their enemies

in war that the record of the prison-ships of the Revolution is deemed

by all the world a black mark on English history.

THE IRISH IN THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR.

SHORT ADDRESS DELIVERED BY MASTER KARL EGAN, AT THE IOWA OPERA HOUSE,

EMMETSBURG, IOWA, MARCH 17, 1909, DURING THE PRESENTATION OF THE

IRISH DRAMA, “THE HERO OF WICKLOW,” UNDER THE AUSPICES OF THE

ANCIENT ORDER OF HIBERNIANS. SOME FACTS OF INTEREST TO THE PEOPLE OF

IRISH BIRTH OR ANCESTRY.

_Ladies and Gentlemen_: On this important anniversary, which is

associated with so many achievements of interest to the people of our

race, it is fitting to enquire what part the Irish took in the

Revolutionary War. What did they do for the cause of human liberty at

this most critical time in the world’s history? All we ask is the truth.

For some reason our ordinary school histories have never given us any

credit for the prominent part our ancestors took in that great struggle.

What I shall say will bear the closest historical investigation.

It was Patrick Henry, who, by his soul-stirring speech, aroused the

members of the Virginia Assembly to a sense of patriotic duty. In 1776

he ran for governor on the Independence ticket and carried that

important colony for the Revolutionary cause. Still, he claimed that

John Rutledge of South Carolina was the greatest American orator of his

time. The latter was also elected president of South Carolina in 1776,

on the same ticket. John Rutledge and Patrick Henry were both sons of

Irishmen.

[Illustration:

MR. WILLIAM J. FEELEY.

Of Providence, R. I.

One of the Committee in charge of the Sullivan Memorial and under

whose guidance the Memorial was designed and executed.

]

During the Revolutionary War men of Irish birth or ancestry served as

governors in South Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Delaware,

New Jersey, New York, Massachusetts and New Hampshire. They were among

the most ardent and fearless of the patriots of that history-making

period.

It was in John Duggan’s tavern in Boston that the Boston Tea Party was

planned. Several Irishmen were in the execution of the plan.

Eleven of the fifty-four members of the first Continental Congress were

Irishmen and sons of Irishmen. Thomas Johnson, who nominated George

Washington for commander-in-chief of the American forces, was a Celt of

the old school.

The war began April, 1775, but it was not officially declared until July

4, 1776. October 15, 1775, Congress sent a committee to interview

General Washington and to decide as to the advisability of continuing

the struggle. Of the five who participated in that most important

conference, Joseph Reed and Thomas Lynch were Irish. The other members

were Benjamin Franklin, Colonel Harrison and General Washington.

A rough draft of the Declaration of Independence was prepared by Thomas

Jefferson. It was re-written and carefully revised by Charles Thompson,

who was styled the Samuel Adams of Philadelphia, and the life of the

cause of liberty. When the Declaration was first proclaimed, it was

signed by John Hancock, as president of the Continental Congress, and by

Charles Thompson, as secretary. The other names were attached later.

Thompson was an Irishman and Hancock an Irish American. John Nixon first

publicly read it and Thos. Dunlap first printed it and published it to

the world. Both were Celtic to the backbone. Who periled most in signing

the immortal document? History answers, Charles Carroll of Carrollton,

another Irish American.

Who fought the hardest in the British House of Parliament for the rights

of American colonists? Edmond Bourk, an Irishman, and one of the

greatest statesmen the world has ever known.

In placing his most important officers, General Washington had Morgan

and Hand leading his rifles, Knox at the head of his artillery, John

Dunlap as his life guard, Edward Hand as his adjutant-general, Andrew

Lewis as his brigadier-general, Stephen Moylan and John Fitzgerald as

his aids, and Ephraim Blaine as his quartermaster. All were Irish by

birth or ancestry. When Washington was retreating through New Jersey, he

sent word to Thomas Johnson, a Maryland Celt, that he had not enough men

to fight the British and too few to run away with. Johnson raised a

force of 1,800 men and hurried to his assistance.

All students of American history have read of the gallant Richard

Montgomery, Mad Anthony Wayne, John Sullivan, Daniel Morgan, Stephen

Moylan, John Fitzgerald, Henry Knox, Wm. Irvine, Richard Butler, and

Generals Cochran, Campbell, McDowell, McCall, McClary, Jasper, Graham,

Hazelett, Colonel Pickens, and many others who were among the most

valiant and successful officers in that eventful conflict. All belonged

to our liberty-loving, heroic race. It has been officially ascertained

that out of 131 of the most prominent officers in the war for American

Independence, 20 were of English ancestry, 25 of French, 10 of German

and Dutch, 8 of Scotch, 2 of Polish, and 84 of Irish and Welch.

Commodores Barry, Perry, McDonough and Stewart, of the wars of 1776 and

1812, were scions of brave-hearted exiles from the Emerald Isle.

June 16, 1779, Joseph Galloway, speaker of the Pennsylvania House of

Representatives, who had to fly to England because of his sympathy with

the Tories, was examined as a witness by a committee of the British

House of Parliament, and he testified that the Irish constituted

one-half of the American army, the native Americans one-fourth and that

the other one-fourth were English and Scotch. This statement is

corroborated by Lecky, the English historian, Lord Mountjoy, General

Lee, Count Rochambeau, Col. J. C. Custis, the adopted son of General

Washington, and Rev. P. Allison, the Presbyterian chaplain of

Washington’s army. They are competent authorities. President Roosevelt

and James G. Blaine, in public addresses, have acknowledged, in

substance, the accuracy of this testimony. Hutchinson, the last royal

governor of Massachusetts, declared that his colony would never have

voted for independence, had it not been for the rebellious Irish.

There were 15 Irish in the battle of Lexington and 258 at Bunker Hill.

The monument at Bunker Hill is covered with Irish names. Captain Parker,

who commanded at Lexington, and who was killed, was Irish. Colonels

Barrett, Smith and Davis, who commanded at Concord, were also Irish.

When the American forces took possession of Boston, John Sullivan was

officer of the day and the countersign was “St. Patrick.”

After the treason of Benedict Arnold, General Washington ordered that

none but the Irish be placed on guard at West Point.

When the soldiers of Lafayette were half naked and starving, the Irish

people of Baltimore, then a place of only one hundred homes, gave them

food and clothing. In 1780, when the finances of the struggling republic

were at the lowest ebb, when it took from $30 to $50 in paper to make $1

in specie, after our soldiers had suffered at Valley Forge and

elsewhere, the business men of Philadelphia raised 315,000 lbs. sterling

and gave it to Congress. Twenty-seven Irishmen of that city contributed

103,500 pounds of that amount. They were members of the Friendly Sons of

St. Patrick, which gave 399 officers of the highest rank to the city,

state and nation during its early history. Washington became an honorary

member of that patriotic organization.

When our country so badly needed assistance, Bishop Carroll accompanied

Benjamin Franklin to France to seek the aid of that country. It was

secured. History gives Franklin the credit, but does not mention the

name of Bishop Carroll, who really made the mission a successful one.

Bishop Carroll also accompanied Franklin to the French Canadian

provinces for a similar purpose.

There were twelve Irish delegates to the convention that adopted the

Constitution, and there were five Irishmen in the first United States

Senate of twenty-two members.

Dr. Hugh Knox educated Alexander Hamilton, who was a poor boy. Doctor

Knox was a big-hearted Irishman. It was Matthew P. Lyon, an Irishman,

who was sold as a slave in Connecticut when a mere boy, who, on the

thirty-sixth ballot, as a congressman from Vermont, later in life, cast

the deciding vote that elected Thomas Jefferson president of the United

States over Aaron Burr.

Many who came with the French to assist the Americans were sons of

Irishmen, who had been driven to France with Patrick Sarsfield after the

treachery of the British at Limerick in 1691.

From 1691 to 1791, over 400,000 different Irishmen served in the French

army. When the Revolutionary War broke out, they petitioned the French

War Department to come to America to fight their national foes. There

were entire Irish regiments in the French army when Cornwallis

surrendered at Yorktown. A young Irishman, Robert Wilson, was appointed

to take charge of the surrendered flags and the news of the great

victory was sent in haste to President Thomas McKean, of the Continental

Congress at Philadelphia. McKean was one of the foremost Irish Americans

of his time.

Molly Pitcher and Nancy Hart, two Irish women who participated in the

Revolutionary War, deserve rank with the greatest heroines in history.

The Irish were among the leading educators, journalists, theologians,

historians, scientists, canal constructors, and railway builders of the

decades subsequent to the Revolutionary War. They were leaders in laying

substantially the broad foundation for our material, educational and

moral greatness. They gave us such statesmen as James Monroe, Andrew

Jackson, John C. Calhoun, James K. Polk, and many others, who were among

the very ablest national leaders in the early history of our republic.

I shall not refer to the part the Irish took in the War of 1812, the

Mexican War, the great Civil conflict, or the Spanish-American struggle

for supremacy. All I ask is for you to reflect on their great fight for

liberty from 1775 to 1783—that struggle that has been felt around the

world—and to tell the facts to your children, to your friends, and to

your fellow citizens, for they will not, for some unknown reason, find

it in ordinary histories. I can do no better than to quote, in closing,

the words of Colonel John Parke Custis, the adopted son of General

Washington:

“Then honored be the old and good services of the sons of Erin in the

war of independence. Let the shamrock be entwined with the laurels of

the Revolution; and truth and justice, guiding the pen of history,

inscribe on the tablets of American remembrance: ‘Eternal gratitude to

Irishmen.’”

[Illustration:

HON. THOMAS HASSETT.

New York.

Elected a Life Member in 1908.

]

HON. ELI THAYER, ONE OF THE EARLY MEMBERS OF THE AMERICAN IRISH

HISTORICAL SOCIETY. A MOST DISTINGUISHED AMERICAN, KNOWN THE WORLD OVER.

A FEW FACTS ABOUT HIS LIFE AND WORK.

BY THE SECRETARY-GENERAL.

Hon. Eli Thayer was born in the town of Mendon, in the state of

Massachusetts, June 11, 1819, and deceased at Worcester, in that state,

April 15, 1899, aged eighty years.

He was elected a member of the American Irish Historical Society in

1897, shortly after its first meeting, and was an active and interested

member at the time of his death.

Mr. Thayer was a descendant in the seventh generation from Thomas Thayer

and seventh in descent from John Alden of _Mayflower_ fame, through

Ruth, daughter of Rev. Noah Alden of Bellingham, Mass., who married his

grandfather, Benjamin Thayer. John Alden was an Irishman and Thomas

Thayer was Irish on the side of one of his parents.

He was the eldest of eight children. He received his early education in

the district schools of Mendon, and at the Bellingham High School. Later

he attended the academy at Amherst and the manual training school at

Worcester, afterwards the Worcester Academy. He always ranked high in

his scholarship, and in 1835–’36 taught school in Douglass, and for the

four succeeding years assisted his father in a country store at

Millville. In May, 1840, he re-entered the manual labor school, in order

to fit for Brown University. Two years later he taught school at

Hopkinton, Rhode Island, and while there was elected a member of the Phi

Beta Kappa fraternity, an honor seldom conferred before the senior year.

In September, 1844, the superintendent of schools in Providence, Nathan

Bishop, induced him to take charge of the boys’ high school for the

remainder of the year for $600, a large salary for that period. This

school had proven for some time unmanageable in the hands of several

masters, but he reduced it to order and subjection. By accepting this

position, he lost a year at Brown University, but was able to graduate

in 1845, the second in his class. After his graduation, he immediately

came to Worcester and became a teacher at the Academy, and was later its

principal.

In 1845 he purchased of John Jaques four acres and ninety rods of land

in Worcester, on what was then called Goat Hill. In 1848 he began the

erection of the building called the Oread, which was completed in 1852.

It is built of the stone underlying the hill. At first only the north

tower was completed, and it was in this portion of the building that he

established the famous school for young women, which he conducted with

great success until he entered upon his later political work.

At the time that the school was opened, it was the only institute in the

country that promised a full college course for women. It was the

forerunner of Vassar, Smith and Wellesley. The name Oread means “the

abode of the mountain nymphs.” The south tower was completed in 1850,

and the connecting portion of the building a year or two later.

The towers are 40 feet in diameter and four stories high, while the

entire length of the building is 250 feet. It was constructed after

designs entirely Mr. Thayer’s own, without the aid of an architect, and

the beauty of the building and the charming location have been remarked

by strangers from all over the country.

He entered political life in 1852, when he was elected a member of the

school board. Later he was a member of the board of aldermen and served

during the years of 1853–’54 in the state legislature. It was during his

first year in the state House of Representatives that he became

conspicuous by the introduction of a bill to incorporate the Bank of

Mutual Redemption, which was hailed with delight by bankers and monied

men throughout the state, as it seemed to afford a means of release from

the autocratic rule of the Suffolk Bank of Boston.

This bill was passed in the course of years and the Bank of Mutual

Redemption loaned the money to the government when Andrew was governor

during the Civil War.

It was not, however, until 1854 that Mr. Thayer accomplished the great

act of his life, the one which enrolls his name among the benefactors of

mankind, in originating the plan which saved Kansas and other

territories to the Union and perhaps settled the destiny of the nation,

for if the southern leaders had secured the territories, it would have

given them the balance of power for many years to come and there would

have been no rebellion. The North would have acquiesced, as it always

had, in the decision of the congressional majority. In his original idea

of making Kansas free, he actually settled the destinies of the country.

It was at a meeting to protest against the repeal of the Missouri

compromise, held in the old city hall on the evening of March 11, 1854,

that Mr. Thayer announced his celebrated “plan of freedom.” In effect it

was simply to take possession by lawful means of the new territories

through organized immigration of free-state men sustained by a base of

supplies.

Mr. Thayer defined this plan as “business anti-slavery,” distinguished

from sentimental and political anti-slavery, both of which had been

tried for many years and found to be faulty, slavery in the meantime

constantly growing stronger. He clearly saw that whichever side gained

the majority of the settlers would control the situations of the new

section, in spite of all efforts to establish others among them, and to

the purpose of securing this majority for freedom he devoted all his

energies and all of his means until that end was accomplished.

As the first means toward fortifying himself for this undertaking he

immediately secured the passage of an act to incorporate the

Massachusetts Emigrant Aid Company and before the vote to repeal the

Missouri compromise was taken, hired a hall in Boston and began to speak

afternoon and evening in behalf of his undertaking.

The intense excitement and strong opposition which followed the first

announcement of the purpose to repeal the compromise in a great measure

subsided after that act was accomplished, and he found extreme

difficulty in the succeeding months in persuading a sufficient number of

men to join in his enterprise to form the first colony.

The Know-Nothing frenzy absorbed the public mind so fully that other

considerations were almost entirely excluded, and the Free Soil vote of

1854 dwindled to a few thousands, the Republican candidate for governor

himself deserting his party and voting with the native Americans. The

Know-Nothing organization had controlled the state for three years, and

the frenzy had seized the public mind to such an extent that no man who

aspired to public office had a chance of election unless he was

affiliated with that party.

Every member of Congress belonged to it, and it has been commonly said

that Henry Wilson and other prominent office-holders of that time were

elected upon that platform. The national Know-Nothing party did not

agitate the slavery question, but maintained that Congress ought not to

legislate on the question of slavery, which was regulated by the

statutes of the various states.

In 1856 the Republicans of the Massachusetts congressional district in

which Worcester is situated came to the front, but, feeling that they

stood no show of winning at the pending elections, made alliances with

the Know-Nothing party, whereby the offices were to be divided, and Col.

Alexander Dewitt made an agreement with Henry Chapin that he would not

run against him. At the last moment, however, Governor Gardiner sent

word that he must make the run against Chapin. It was at this crisis

that Charles White, a party manager, nominated Eli Thayer for Congress,

and took a carriage and went to the Oread to notify him of his

nomination.

Mr. Thayer was warmly greeted in the convention and, although it was but

five days before the election, he announced his determination to stump

the district and called for means of transportation to the various towns

and villages. During the five days he made on an average four speeches a

day. At the close of the campaign Dr. Joseph Sargent said to Mr. Thayer

that no man could do what he had done and live, but he replied that he

was prepared to undertake the same ordeal again in the same cause.

During this campaign he would speak at Clinton in the morning, at

Leominster at noon, at Ashburnham in the afternoon and at Fitchburg in

the evening, and it was in this way that he covered the entire Worcester

district in the short space of five days. The result of this bitter

contest was most gratifying to Mr. Thayer, who won by a vote of nearly

two to one. The election was in November, 1856, but Mr. Thayer did not

take his seat until the December of the following year.

At this time a new matter was interesting the southern members—the

retention of the state of Kansas in the Democratic column. The notable

southern propagandists, of which Quitman of Mississippi was the

representative, had, in order to amend the neutrality laws, put on foot

a scheme for the unification of Mexico, Cuba and Central America and the

formation of an immense slave empire. This was regarded by the northern

representatives with a great deal of apprehension, but much to the

surprise of everyone Mr. Thayer came out in favor of it.

[Illustration:

MR. WILLIAM J. FARRELL.

Of New York.

A New Life Member of the Society.

]

He said to the southern leaders that he intended to colonize this new

empire with New England Yankees. His speeches on Central American

colonization, on the “Suicide of Slavery,” and on the “Admission of

Oregon” brought him great fame. Against the caucus decision of his own

party he secured the admission of Oregon into the Union, and in this

act, though in opposition to partisan dictation, he was sustained by

leading Republican organs throughout the country, although he received

some censure in his own district.

Soon after these speeches his political enemies in the district began to

organize against him, but his popularity was not to be overcome and he

was returned with a flattering endorsement. During his second term in

Congress he was instrumental in the admission of Oregon as a state to

statehood. The Republicans were of the opinion that the admission of

Oregon into the Union would mean heavier Democratic representation. Mr.

Thayer, however, argued that the best way to make Oregon a Republican

state would be to admit it into the Union. Succeeding events proved that

his view of the matter was correct, but at the time the Republicans in

the House opposed the admission.

The journal of the American-Irish Historical Society, Vol. VIII, 1909 · 第 19 / 29 段