Cinematographs there were in profusion, most of them exhibiting scenes

of a kind which would speedily be suppressed on this side the Channel;

shooting galleries galore, exactly like our own; peep-shows,

marionette theatres, panoramas; a booth with a two-headed bull and

other monsters, a Breton bagpiper playing his instrument outside being

worthy of inclusion in the list; but one saw no "fat women"--possibly

because they are such common objects of French life! A large

switchback railway seemed to be very popular, and, like all the rival

attractions, its proprietors claimed for it the distinction of having

come "direct from the Paris Exhibition," where it had been awarded

first prize. The smallest side-shows, consisting of perhaps a few

distorting mirrors, had all been "exhibited at Paris," and the

two-headed bull was advertised by a huge painting showing all the

crowned heads of Europe and President Loubet examining the beast,

which, on inspection, turned out to be only a little removed from the

normal by having a head slightly broader than usual, with the

incipient formation of a third eye in its forehead, and a muzzle

remotely suggestive of two joined together.

V.

A performance which I enjoyed not a little was given by a quack

doctor. An enormous carriage, resembling in outline an old

stage-coach, but decorated with much carved moulding and thickly

covered with gilt and crimson, which produced a most bizarre effect,

stood in an open space. Seated on the roof was a boy, who turned a

machine which emitted the only hideous noise to be heard at the fair.

In the open fore-part, richly cushioned, a man stood dressed in a

dazzling suit of brass armour, his glittering helmet lying in front of

him, and in his hand a small bottle of clear liquid. He was of the

southern type, swarthy, wonderfully fluent of speech. He assured a

gaping crowd that his medicine could cure any disease from toothache

to tetanus, and he invited any sufferer to step up. Immediately one

did so, the boy ground out the hideous din above, and the doctor sat

for a few noisy seconds while his patient told him his trouble! Then

the racket was stopped with a wave of the quack's hand, and he

explained for five minutes, in vivid words, the terrible nature of the

patient's disease, and invited the poor wretch to pick any bottle from

the stock in front of him. This done, he had to open his waistcoat and

shirt--for it was a severe pain in the left side from which he

suffered--and the quack in armour struck the bottom of the bottle on

his knee, thus causing the cork to pop out. He now shook the bottle

vigorously with his forefinger on the neck, and the fluid changed into

green, brown, and finally black, whereat the simpletons around

marvelled, as they were meant to do. The comic practitioner next

thrust the bottle into the open shirt-front of his patient, and shook

the contents of it against the victim's skin, pressing his hand for a

few moments on the part. Then he asked the fellow to step down as

cured, and go among the crowd "telling his experience." A dozen cases

were treated in less than half an hour--people with neuralgia,

sprained wrists and ankles--and always the same formula as to

consultation, explanation, application! A handful of liquid applied to

a man's cheek evaporated mysteriously and worked wonders. Intending

patients were told that the doctor could be consulted at the hotel

near by during certain hours each day, and many must have gone to him

there, for the fluent humbug had every appearance of driving a

prosperous practice.

VI.

But the feature of this fair which, more than any other, distinguished

it sharply from anything to be seen in our country, was "The Grand

Theatre of the Walkyries and of the Passion of N. S. J. C." The

mysterious initials stand for the French of "Our Lord Jesus Christ." A

gentleman with a shaggy head of hair, dressed in a well-fitting

frock-coat, and possessed of an excellent voice, stood on the platform

outside, surrounded by oil paintings of sacred pictures and a dozen

or more performers in the costumes of Roman soldiers, apostles and

other Biblical characters. Judas was readily distinguished by his red

hair, Mary by her nunlike garb. The showman announced that the

performance was "about to commence," and urged us to walk up and

witness the most pleasing spectacle of the fair. A hand-bill

distributed among the crowd described the entertainment as a

"mimodrame biblique" of the Passion, played, sung, enterpreted and

mimicked by forty persons! "This spectacle, unique in France, will

leave in the minds of the inhabitants of this town an unforgettable

memory. It is not to be confounded with anything else you may have

seen; it is no mere series of living pictures. At each performance M.

Chaumont, the originator, will present twenty-one tableaux, three

hundred costumes will be used, and three apotheoses will be shown. The

establishment is comfortable, lighted by electricity from a plant of

thirty-horse power. It is a spectacle of the best taste, pleasing to

everyone, and families may come here with the fullest confidence.

Balloons will be distributed to the children every Thursday." So ran

the circular, which also contained the information (mendacious, I

doubt not) that the entertainment was the property of a limited

company with a capital of £20,000.

When the signal to begin was given the place was not more than half

filled, and the audience seemed in no reverential mood. A pianist

began to play on a very metallic piano, and outside the voice of the

manager was still heard urging the crowd to "walk up" and "be in

time." The drop-curtain was rolled up, and the manager stepped inside

the building as a number of characters in the sacred drama filed on to

the stage. He explained, in a rapid torrent of words, what they were

supposed to be doing, but Judas jingled the filthy lucre so lustfully

that the pantomime was very obvious in its purport. The curtain fell

again, and the manager stepped outside to harangue the crowd while the

second tableau was being prepared; but the ringing of a bell brought

him in again, and so on through the whole series.

It must be confessed that the performance was carried out with no

small dramatic ability, and M. Chaumont gave a wonderfully realistic

interpretation of the rôle of Christ, some of the tableaux being

strikingly conceived, as, for examples, the kiss of Judas and Christ

before Pilate, the latter character being admirably represented by a

performer who looked a veritable Roman proconsul, and washed his hands

with traditional dignity. The Crucifixion, too, was represented with

vivid reality; but the audience was disposed to laugh at the writhing

of the malefactors on their crosses, and did indeed giggle when the

soldier held up the sponge of vinegar to the dying Saviour. It was

obvious that the whole performance, although really discharged by the

actors with remarkable fidelity to tradition, and a commendable

assumption of reverence, was more amusing than impressive to the

spectators, who, though moved to laughter when St. Veronica pressed

her handkerchief to the face of Christ and, turning to the audience,

displayed the miraculous impression of His features, applauded the

more dramatic scenes liberally. What interested me personally was M.

Chaumont's idea of a miracle. Save that of St. Veronica, I have

forgotten the others enacted; they were quite unfamiliar to me, but in

the instant of each miracle a limelight was flashed for two or three

seconds from "the flies," and this was supposed to betoken the

super-natural character of the affair.

VII.

Of course, such a spectacle as I have described would be quite

impossible in our country to-day, although time was in our history,

when miracle plays were a recognised feature of the church in England.

It was in no sense comparable with any of the passion plays still

performed periodically in some continental towns, and while the

incongruous surroundings of "The Grand Theatre of the Passion of

N.S.J.C." were not calculated to induce a spirit of reverence in the

spectators, it was a saddening spectacle to find an audience of

Catholic people taking so lightly the representation of scenes which,

however wrong in the light of history, should have been to them sacred

subjects of faith.

It was characteristically French that immediately opposite the theatre

wherein this Biblical pantomime was presented stood a large exhibition

containing an enormous collection of pathological models and

curiosities. This was, without doubt, the foulest display of

unspeakable horrors to be seen in any civilised country in our time,

for under the hypocritical plea of illustrating, by wax models and

otherwise, the obstetrics of human life and the diseases of the body,

its proprietor--a woman, if you will believe me--had gathered together

a collection of incredible horrors which men and women, and even young

people, were allowed to inspect on the payment of one franc. The same

exhibition, which is probably not over-valued at £20,000, was actually

brought to London some few years ago, but the police speedily cleared

it out of our country.

These blots, however, are the only blemishes on the Orleans Fair, and

for brightness, gaiety, and general good taste, I must conclude as I

began, by saying that a French carnival is in every sense a more

pleasing spectacle than any of our English or Scottish fairs present.

The Palace of the Angels

I.

It was in Evreux, while cycling through Normandy one summer, that my

wife and I met three "new women," who were also touring the country

a-wheel. Their route was for the most part the reverse of ours, but

not so extended, and in discussing the country with them I asked how

long they had spent at Mont St. Michel. "Oh, we have not gone there,"

was the reply; "we were told it wasn't interesting, and so we have

kept away from it." We were saddened to find that three English women,

especially of the "advanced type," could know so little of the

monuments of France as to accept the irresponsible opinion of some

one-eyed tourist, who in his or her idle babble had said Mont St.

Michel was not worth visiting.

Not interesting, indeed! There is not in the whole of Normandy, in all

France, in historic England even, an example of so much interest

concentrated in so small a space. An enthusiastic Frenchman has

described it as the eighth wonder of the world. Victor Hugo has said

that Mont St. Michel is to France what the Pyramids are to Egypt.

Large and deeply interesting volumes have been written about it. It

will form a theme for writers for generations to come, and artists

will employ their pencils here so long as a vestige of the wonderful

buildings remains.

There is a strong temptation in writing of Mont St. Michel to fall

into the style of the junior reporter, who will blandly tell you that

a thing is indescribable, and immediately proceed to describe it. One

is persuaded that this marvellous monument of the Middle Ages cannot

be adequately described in plain prose, however apt the pen, yet one

is equally desirous of making the attempt. But I shall promise my

readers on this occasion to make no effort at an elaborate

description, which, indeed, the space of a single chapter renders

impossible, and to attempt no more than a general sketch of the most

noteworthy features of the Mount.

II.

To begin with, I take it for granted that the reader, if he or she has

not already visited Mont St. Michel, is at least aware that it is

situated in the bay of the same name, near the point where the coasts

of Normandy and Brittany merge, and thus some forty-three miles

south-east of Jersey. The story of Mont St. Michel, even had the hand

of man never reared upon the rock one of the most remarkable

structures the human mind has conceived, could scarcely have failed to

be interesting. During the Roman occupation of France, or Gaul as it

was then called, the great stretch of sea that lies to-day between the

Mount and Jersey was then a vast forest, through which some fourteen

miles of Roman military road were constructed. But in the third

century the invasion of the sea compelled the Romans to alter the

course of their road, and in the next century both the Mount and the

small island of Tombelaine, which lies scarcely two miles away, were

isolated at high tide. So on from century to century the sea has

gradually eaten away this part of Normandy, until now some hundred and

ninety square miles of land are entirely submerged at high tide. This

alone is sufficient to invest the Mount with a peculiar interest, for

one can stand upon it to-day and, gazing far away to sea, contemplate

the absolute mastery of Neptune, whose ravages have left of all the

great forest of Scissy nothing more than a handful of trees growing

sturdily among the rocks on the north side of the Mount.

But it is the human interest attaching to Mont St. Michel that

outweighs everything else. The rock is steeped in religious lore, and

in the annals of war there is no place in France more historic.

Originally a monastery, it became in time an impregnable fortress as

well; the rough warrior lived side by side upon it with the studious

monk, and there the clash of battle was as regular an occurrence for

years on end as the mass and vespers. In its old age it became a

prison, one of the most dreaded in a land of terrible prisons, and

just as it had been absolutely impregnable to attack (the English

without success besieging it for eleven years in the fifteenth

century), so was it an inviolable prison, only one man ever having

been able to effect his escape, and even in his case escape would have

been impossible but for the facilities unconsciously placed in his

hands by his gaolers.

III.

The first thought that comes to the visitor as he views the Mount from

the shore is, What could have induced anyone to choose so difficult a

site for the foundation of a monastery? But here legend conveniently

steps in and explains all. In the eighth century Aubert, the Bishop of

Avranches, one of the most pious in an age of piety, was in the habit

of retiring to the Mount for rest and meditation, and during one of

his visits there the Archangel Saint Michael, the Prince of the Armies

of the Lord, appeared to him and told him to build on the top of the

Mount a sanctuary in his honour. From which it will be seen that even

angels in those days were not above self-advertisement. But Aubert,

though a bishop, was "even as you and I," and when he awoke in the

morning he had some doubt as to whether he had been dreaming or had

really entertained the Archangel; so he prolonged his stay in the hope

of receiving another visit; nor was he disappointed. A few days later

Saint Michael appeared to him once more, and rather sharply repeated

his command. But even now Aubert was not convinced, and he determined

to give Saint Michael a third chance, which the Saint was nothing

loath to accept, repeating his instructions in a most peremptory

manner. He also touched the bishop's head, leaving a hole in the skull

"for a sign." We have heard of a surgical operation to introduce a

joke, but this is the only case on record where a saint has found it

necessary to perform a surgical operation for the introduction of a

command into the head of a bishop, and Aubert, like a sensible man,

concluding that one hole in his skull was sufficient, immediately set

about the building of "the Palace of the Angels." Aubert's skull is

still preserved in the Church of Saint Gervais at Avranches, and the

startling effect of Saint Michael's touch may be seen to this day!

This is only one of the innumerable legends relating to the origin of

the Abbey. Another is worthy of mention, illustrating, as it does, the

advantages of co-operation with an angel when one is performing so

difficult a task as Aubert took up. On the top of the Mount were two

large rocks which interfered seriously with building, and could be

moved by no human efforts. Saint Michael, therefore, appeared to a

devout peasant who lived on the coast and bore the familiar name of

Bain, telling him to take his sons to the Mount and move the rocks.

Despite the Caledonian flavour of his name, Bain did not wait to have

his skull perforated by the Archangel, but went forthwith together

with eleven of his children and tried to move the rocks. They could

not stir them one hair's-breadth, however; whereupon Aubert asked Bain

if he had brought all his children, and the good man explained that

they were all there except the baby, which was with its mother. The

Bishop then instructed him to go at once and fetch the infant, "for

God often chooses the weak to confound the strong." The child was

brought, and at a touch of his little foot the rocks went tumbling

down the Mount, in proof of which one of them may be seen to this day

with a little chapel to Saint Aubert built on the top of it.

One more of the many miracles associated with the beginning of the

great work should not be left unmentioned. Saint Aubert was naturally

much exercised as to where he should rear his sanctuary, the pinnacle

of a lonely rock being an unusual place to build on even in those

unusual days, but here again the Archangel, who had manifested so much

personal interest in the work, came to his rescue, and caused a heavy

dew to fall on the Mount, leaving a dry space on the top. Upon this

dry space was the church to be built.

In 709 Saint Aubert had practically completed the structure, and the

church was dedicated to Saint Michael after two precious relics

(namely, a piece of a scarlet veil, which the Archangel had left on

the occasion of his famous appearance at Monte Gargano in Naples,

together with a piece of the marble on which he had stood) had been

placed in a casket on the altar. Not a vestige of the oratory built by

Saint Aubert, nor of the church erected in 963 by Richard, remains.

The oldest part of the buildings now existing represents a church

founded in 1020 by Richard, second Duke of Normandy, and constructed

under the direction of the Abbot Hildebert II. The transepts, the

greater part of the nave, and the crypts date back to this period.

IV.

The whole scheme of the wonderful memorial that fascinates the eye of

the latter-day tourist owed its conception to this eleventh-century

abbot, and surely no heaven-born architect ever conceived a more

audacious plan. His project was not merely to occupy the limited space

on the summit of the Mount with his religious buildings, but to start

far down the sides of the rock, and, by utilising the Mount just as

the sculptor makes use of a skeleton frame whereon to plaster the clay

in which he models his statue, so to rear upward gigantic walls and

buttresses which at the top would carry a huge platform to hold the

superstructures, creating thus a collection of vast buildings with the

live rock thrust up in the centre for foundation. It is to the glory

of Saint Michael that for no less than five centuries this colossal

scheme of Hildebert's was carried out with absolute unity of purpose

by his successors, an achievement only possible among religious

workers. The result was that this lonely Mount gradually became

clothed with a series of most beautiful buildings, which to the eye of

the beholder seem to have grown by some natural process out of the

rock itself.

[Illustration: GENERAL VIEW OF MONT ST. MICHEL]

To the student of architecture it would be impossible to mention any

monument more worthy of study than this. Not only do we find within

its innumerable cloisters, crypts, and halls, specimens of the purest

Gothic that exists, but at every turn we are presented with structures

that conform to the very highest ideals of art, in being at once

useful and beautiful. There is not a single buttress, not a window,

not an arch, not a pillar, that does not discharge some duty, and the

removal of which would not weaken in some degree a part of the scheme.

V.

The best way to secure an intelligible notion of the work of these

monkish builders is to walk around the Mount at low tide and study the

buildings from the outside. The feature that will most impress one in

following this course is the wonderful north side of the Mount, known

as the Merveille, which rears its massive walls sheer from the rock

face, supported along its entire length by enormous buttresses, that

spring with a fine suggestion of strength and permanency from their

rocky base. The principal buildings, apart from the church, are

contained within these massive walls. To the west we have, in three

stories, the Cellar, the Salle des Chevaliers, and above the latter

the open Cloister, the most perfect example of its kind in the world.

The eastern part begins with the Almonry, above which is the Salle des

Hôtes, and on the top of that the Refectory.

The whole effect of the Merveille is superb, yet what is it more than

a great wall, held up by mighty buttresses, pierced in different ways

to light the chambers within and to make each suitable for its

particular office? The most perfect economy has been observed

throughout, the buttresses are terminated the moment their services

are not required, and the Refectory, which carries a light wooden

roof, is lighted by means of long narrow lancets which give to the

wall far more strength than would have been possible had it been

pierced by wide windows; still, the lighting within is perfect. In

brief, the Merveille, apart from the numerous other buildings that

went to form the monastic and military establishment, is enough to

send an architect into raptures, and might, if he knew not the dangers

of the incoming tide, which has to cover nine miles of land at the

rate of a race-horse, induce him to tarry over long in feasting his

eyes on this marvellous achievement. It is beautiful beyond

description, and yet we may be certain that its builders never

thought of mere beauty in its construction, but built purely to meet

the exigencies of the situation, and to provide the best possible

accommodation for the inhabitants of the monastery and their

dependants. As one writer has put it, "the beauty just happened." It

is only when we find builders striving after effect that we are face

to face with decadent art.

Continuing our walk round the rock on those sands that have been the

scene of many a bitter battle, we pass under the ramparts, beginning

with the Tour du Nord at the eastern end of the Merveille. Here,

again, the beautiful union of art and Nature is observed, this

magnificent tower seeming to be but the natural growth of the shelving

rocks at its base. It is no surprise to know that through the ages

which knew not the Maxim or the 100-ton gun, the splendid

fortifications successfully resisted every attack of the envious

English, the Bretons, and the Huguenots. The modern town is huddled

picturesquely between the ramparts and the Abbey to the east and

south.

VI.

Having completed the tour around the Mount, the visitor should proceed

along the ramparts, and reach the entrance to the Abbey by the

staircase known as the Grand Degré, which leads into the Barbican, and

through the massive and beautiful Châtelet into the more ancient

entrance of the Abbey, known as Belle-Chaise, where are situated the

Guard Room and the Government Room. Here the guide will take us in

hand, and march us from point to point of interest in the interior.

But it is impossible, in the space of a short chapter, to attempt a

description of this, that would follow in any detail the stipulated

round of the apartments at present shown to the public.

Suffice it to say that you will first be taken to the Church, which is

now, and likely to be for many years, in the hands of the restorers.

Only four bays of the seven that went to the making of the great

Norman nave remain, and these have had to be much restored; but here

it is a pleasure to record that the restoration has been carried out

with perfect taste, so that the latter-day visitor has an excellent

idea of the appearance of the Abbey and its dependent buildings as

these were in the heyday of Mont St. Michel's prosperity.

In the Track of R. L. Stevenson and Elsewhere in Old France · 第 12 / 13 段