MR. GARRISON’S MISSION TO ENGLAND.--NEW YORK MOBS.

The subject of this article is very opportune at the present time.[A]

While the roar of the cannon, fired in honor of Mr. Garrison at the

moment of his late departure from England, is still reverberating

through the land, it will be interesting and instructive to recall the

purpose of his mission to that country just thirty-four years ago; and

how he was vilified when he went, and denounced, hunted, mobbed, on

his return. He went there to undeceive the philanthropists of Great

Britain as to a gigantic fraud which had been practised upon them, as

well as the antislavery people of the United States. He has gone now

to the World’s Antislavery Convention as a delegate from our _National

Association_ for the education, and individual, domestic, and civil

elevation of our colored population, whose condition thirty years ago,

and until a much more recent period, it was confidently maintained, and

pretty generally conceded, could not be essentially improved within the

borders of our Republic, if, indeed, on the same continent with our

_superior Anglo-Saxon race_.

The conscience of our country was never at peace concerning the

enslavement of the colored people. It was denounced by Jefferson in

his original draft of the Declaration of Independence, and afterwards

in his “Notes on Virginia.” An effort to abolish slavery was made in

the Convention that framed our Constitution; and strenuous opposition

to that Magna Charta was made in several of the State Conventions

called to ratify it, because the abominable wrong was indirectly and

covertly sanctioned therein. Soon after we became a nation plans were

proposed and associations formed for the improvement of the condition

of the colored population; and the General Government was earnestly

entreated, in a petition headed by Dr. Franklin, “to go to the utmost

limits of its power” to eradicate the great evil from the land. But the

doctrine was industriously taught by our statesmen that the status of

that class of the people was left, in the Constitution of the Union,

to be determined by the government of each of the States in which they

may be found. And still greater pains were taken, by those who were

bent on the perpetuation of slavery, to make it generally believed

throughout the country that negroes were naturally a very inferior

race of men; utterly incapable of much mental or moral culture, and

better off in domestic servitude on our continent than in their native

state in Africa. Notwithstanding this disparagement of them, and the

other inducements pressed upon the white people everywhere to acquiesce

in their enslavement, many colored persons emancipated themselves,

especially in Maryland, Virginia, Kentucky, and Louisiana; and many

more were set free by the workings of the consciences of their owners,

or in gratitude for their services to individuals or the public. Thus,

considerable bodies of freedmen were found almost everywhere in the

midst of the slaves. Not without reason, these persons became objects

of distrust to slaveholders. Devices were therefore sought to get rid

of their disturbing influence, and to prevent the increase of the

number of such persons.

In 1816 the grand scheme was proposed, and readily adopted in most of

the slaveholding States, for colonizing on the coast of Africa the free

colored people of the United States, and prohibiting the emancipation

of any more of the enslaved, excepting upon the condition of their

removal to Liberia.

To carry this great undertaking into complete effect it was necessary

to secure the patronage of the Federal Government. This obviously could

not be done, without first conciliating to the project the approval and

co-operation of the people of the non-slaveholding States. Accordingly,

agents, eloquent and cunning, were sent north, east, and west, to

summon the benevolent and patriotic everywhere to aid in an enterprise

which, it was claimed, would result in the safe but entire abolition of

American slavery.

The dreadful wrongs and cruelties inflicted upon our bondmen were

not kept out of sight by these agents, but sometimes glowingly

depicted. The participation of the Northern States in the original

sin of the enslavement of Africans was pertinently urged. The utter

impracticability and danger of setting free such hordes of ignorant,

degraded people were insisted on with particular emphasis. The

immense good that would be done to benighted Africa was eloquently

portrayed,--how the slave-trade might be stopped, and the knowledge

of the arts of civilized America, and the blessings of our Christian

religion, might be spread throughout that dark region of the earth,

from the basis of colonies planted at Liberia and elsewhere along those

coasts, hitherto visited only by mercenary and cruel white men. All

these considerations were so pressed upon the churches and ministers

and kind-hearted people of the Northern States, that erelong an

enthusiasm was awakened everywhere in favor of colonizing the colored

people of our country “in their native land,” and thus, at the same

time, evangelizing Africa and wiping out the shame of the American

Republic. Without stopping to consider the glaring inconsistencies of

the scheme, it was taken for granted to be the only feasible way of

doing what we all longed to have done,--abolishing slavery. So the

colonization of our colored population became the favorite enterprise

at the North, even more than at the South. Thousands who were so

prejudiced against them that they would never consent to admit them

to the enjoyment of the rights, and the exercise of the prerogatives,

of men in our country were ready to give liberally to have them

transported across the Atlantic, and were deluded into the belief that

it was a benevolent, yes, a Christian enterprise. The very elect were

deceived. The men who have since been most distinguished among the

Abolitionists--Mr. Garrison, Arthur Tappan, Gerrit Smith, James G.

Birney, and hundreds more--were for a while zealous Colonizationists.

Not until Mr. Garrison had been some time resident in Baltimore

as co-editor, with Benjamin Lundy, of the _Genius of Universal

Emancipation_, were the true purpose and spirit of Colonization

discovered. He there found out, as he afterwards made it plainly

appear, that the _intention_ of the originators, and of the Southern

promoters of the scheme, really was, “to rivet still closer the fetters

of the slaves, and to deepen the prejudice against the free people of

color.”

So different had been the representations of its purpose by the

agents of the Colonization Society who had labored in its behalf

throughout the free States, and so utterly unconscious were most of the

Colonizationists on this side of Mason and Dixon’s line of harboring

any such designs, that Mr. Garrison’s accusations fired them with

indignation and wrath. They would not give heed to his incontrovertible

evidence. Though his witnesses were numerous and could not be

impeached, yet were they spurned by most of the persons in the free

States who had espoused the cause. It was enough that Mr. Garrison had

come out in opposition to the plan of Colonization. He was denounced as

an infidel, set upon as an enemy of his country. The churches were all

closed against him. Few ministers ventured to give him any countenance,

and the politicians heaped upon him unmeasured abuse. All this made the

more plain to the young Reformer and his co-laborers how thoroughly

the virus of slavery had poisoned the American body ecclesiastic, as

well as the body politic. It was seen that the church was becoming the

bulwark of slaveholders. Mr. Garrison felt that the first thing to be

done, therefore, was to batter down the confidence of the humane in

the Colonization plan. Against this he drove his sharpest points, at

this he aimed his heaviest artillery. So when it became known to us

that the agents of that plan had labored, with sad effect, in Great

Britain; that they had suborned to their purpose the aid of the English

philanthropists, we all felt, with Mr. Garrison, that those friends of

the oppressed must be undeceived without delay. No one was competent

to do this work so thoroughly as Mr. Garrison himself. Accordingly, it

was determined, in the spring of 1833, that he must see personally the

prominent Abolitionists of Great Britain.

In pursuance of this object he sailed from New York on the first day

of this month, thirty-four years ago. He went with the execrations

of the leading Colonizationists, and all the proslavery partisans of

our country upon his head. He was received in England with the utmost

cordiality and respectful confidence by all the friends of liberty; for

although, as he found, many of them had been persuaded by the agents of

the Colonization Society to give their approval and aid to that scheme,

they had done so because they had been made to believe that it was

intended and adapted to effect the entire abolition of slavery in the

United States.

Nothing could have been more opportune than was his arrival in London.

He found there most of the leading Abolitionists of the United Kingdom

watching and aiding the measures in Parliament about to issue in the

emancipation of the enslaved in the British West India Islands. He was

invited to their councils, and interchanged opinions freely and fully

with them on the great questions, which were essentially the same in

that country and our own. It was especially his privilege to become

acquainted with William Wilberforce and Thomas Clarkson and Fowell

Buxton and George Thompson, to name no more of the noble host that had

fought the battles and won the victory of freedom for eight hundred

thousand slaves. He was there when William Wilberforce was summoned to

lay aside his earthly life, with his antislavery armor, and ascend, we

trust, to the right hand of God. How appropriate that the young leader

of the Abolitionists of America, whose work had just begun, should

be present, as he was, at the obsequies of the veteran leader of the

British Abolitionists just as their work was done!

Mr. Garrison remained in England three or four months, long enough to

accomplish fully the object of his mission. He reached New York on

the 30th of the following September, bringing with him this emphatic

protest, signed by the most distinguished philanthropists, and several

of the most distinguished statesmen of Great Britain:--

“We, the undersigned, having observed with regret that the American

Colonization Society appears to be gaining some adherents in this

country, are desirous to express our opinions respecting it. Our

motive and excuse for thus coming forward are the claims which

that Society has put forth to _Antislavery_ support. These claims

are, in our opinion, wholly groundless; and we feel bound to

affirm that our deliberate judgment and conviction are that the

professions made by the Colonization Society of promoting the

abolition of slavery are delusive....

“While we believe its precepts to be delusive we are convinced that

its _real_ effects are of the most dangerous nature. It takes its

root from a cruel prejudice and alienation in the whites of America

against the colored people, slave or free. This being its source,

its effects are what might be expected....

“On these grounds, therefore, and while we acknowledge the colony

of Liberia, or any other colony on the coast of Africa, to be _in

itself_ a good thing, we must be understood utterly to repudiate

the principles of the American Colonization Society. That Society

is, in our estimation, not deserving of the countenance of the

British public.

(Signed)

“WM. WILBERFORCE,

ZACHARY MACAULAY,

WILLIAM EVANS, M. P.,

SAMUEL GURNEY,

S. LUSHINGTON, M. P.,

T. FOWELL BUXTON, M. P.,

JAMES CROPPER,

DANIEL O’CONNELL, M. P.,”

and others.

Nothing could have maddened the slaveholders and their Northern

abettors more than Mr. Garrison’s success in England, and their

malignant, ferocious hatred of him broke out on his return. It so

happened that, without any expectation of his arrival at the time, a

meeting of those desirous of the abolition of slavery was called, on

the evening of October 2, in Clinton Hall, to organize a city society.

When it was known that Mr. Garrison would be present, most of the New

York newspapers teemed with exciting articles, and an advertisement,

signed “Many Southerners,” summoned “all persons interested in the

subject” to be present at the same time and place. The Abolitionists,

aware that a meeting at Clinton Hall would be broken up, quietly

withdrew to Chatham Street Chapel, and had nearly completed the

organization of the “New York City Antislavery Society,” when the mob

of _slaveholding patriots_, disappointed of their prey at Clinton

Hall, and finding out the retreat of the Abolitionists, rushed upon

and dispersed them from Chatham Street Chapel, with horrid cries of

detestation and threats of utmost violence, especially aimed at Mr.

Garrison, of whom they went in search from place to place, declaring

their determination to wreak upon him their utmost vengeance. Mr.

Garrison, secure in their ignorance of his person, and curious to learn

all he might of the mistaken notions and corrupt principles by which

they were misled and driven to such excesses, went around with them in

their bootless pursuit until he was tired, and the fire of their fury

had cooled.

The New York newspapers, especially the _Courier and Inquirer_,

the _Gazette_, _Evening Post_, and _Commercial Advertiser_, by

their half-way condemnation of this outrage, and their gross

misrepresentations of the sentiments and purposes of Mr. Garrison and

his fellow-laborers, virtually justified that fearful assault upon “the

liberty of speech,” and inauguration of “the Reign of Terror,” of which

I shall hereafter give my readers some account.

Some Recollections of Our Antislavery Conflict · 第 16 / 79 题