XI.

XI. 1. It has been objected to our author's work on the Lives of the

Saints, _that the system of devotion which is recommended by it, is, at

best, suited to the cloister_. But no work has ever appeared, in which

the difference between the duties of a man of the world and the duties

of a religious is more strongly pointed out. Whenever the author has

occasion to mention any action of any saint, which is extraordinary or

singular in its nature he always observes, that it is of a kind rather

to be admired than imitated.

XI. 2. It has been objected, _that the piety which it inculcates is of

the ascetic kind_, and that the spirit of penance, voluntary

mortification, and contempt of the world, which it breathes everywhere,

is neither required nor recommended by the gospel. But no difference can

be found between the spirit of piety inculcated by our author, and that

inculcated by the most approved authors of the Roman Catholic church.

Less of penance, of voluntary mortification, or of contempt of the

world, is not recommended by Rodriguez, by Thomas of Kempis, by St.

Francis of Sales, by Bourdaloue, or Massillon, than is recommended by

our author. Speaking of those "who confound nature with grace, and who

look on the cross of Jesus Christ as an object foreign to faith and

piety;--It was not thus," says Massillon, in his sermon on the

Incarnation, "it was not thus that the apostles announced the gospel to

our ancestors. _The spirit of the gospel is a holy eagerness of

suffering, an incessant attention to mortify self-love, to do violence

to the will, to restrain the desires, to deprive the senses of useless

gratifications; this is the essence of Christianity, the soul of piety_.

If you have not this spirit, you belong not, says the apostle, to Jesus

Christ; it is of no consequence that you are not of the number of the

impure or sacrilegious of whom the apostle speaks, and who will not be

admitted into the kingdom of Christ. You are equally strangers to him;

your sentiments are not his; you still live according to nature; you

belong not to the grace of our Saviour; you will therefore perish, for

it is on him alone, says the apostle, that the Father has placed our

salvation. A complaint is sometimes made that we render piety disgusting

and impracticable, by prohibiting many pleasures which the world

authorizes. But, my brethren, what is it we tell you? allow yourselves

all the pleasures which Christ would have allowed himself; faith allows

you no other; mix with your piety all the gratifications which Jesus

Christ would have mixed in his; the gospel allows no greater

indulgence--O my God, how the decisions of the world will one day be

strangely reversed! when worldly probity and worldly regularity, which,

by a false appearance of virtue, give a deceitful confidence to so many

souls, will be placed by the side of the crucified Jesus, and will be

judged by that model! To be always renouncing yourselves, rejecting what

pleases, regulating the most innocent wishes of the heart by the

rigorous rules of the spirit of the gospel, is difficult, is a state of

violence. But if the pleasures of the senses leave the soul sorrowful,

empty, and uneasy, the rigors of the cross make her happy. Penance heals

the wounds made by herself; like the mysterious bush in the scripture,

while man sees only its thorns and briers, the glory of the Lord is

within it, and the soul that possesses him possesses all. Sweet tears

of penance! divine secret of grace! O that you were better known to the

sinner!" "The pretended esprits forts," says Bourdaloue, in his sermon

on the scandal of the cross, and the humiliations of Jesus Christ, the

noblest of all his sermons, in the opinion of the cardinal de Maury, "do

not relish the rigorous doctrines announced by the Son of God in his

gospel; self-hatred, self-denial, severity to one's self. But when

Christ established a religion for men, who were to acknowledge

themselves sinners and criminals, ought he, as St. Jerome asks, to have

published other laws? What is so proper for sin as penance? what is more

of the nature of penance, than the sinner's harshness and severity to

himself? Is there any thing in this contrary to reason? They are

astonished at his ranking poverty among the beatitudes; that he held up

the cross as an attraction to his disciples to follow him; that he

declared a love of {032} contempt was preferable to the honors of the

world. In all this I see the depth of his divine counsels." Such is the

language of Bourdaloue and Massillon, preaching before a luxurious

court, to the best-informed and most polished audience in the Christian

world. It is apprehended that no other language is found in our author's

Lives of the Saints.

XI. 3. Some (but their number is small) have imputed to our author _too

much credulity respecting miracles_. A chain of agiographists might be

supposed: on the first link of it we might place Surius, as possessing

the utmost degree of the belief of miracles, consistent with any degree

of judgment; on the last we might place Baillet and Launoy, as

possessing the utmost degree of the belief of miracles, consistent with

any degree of deference to the general opinions of pious Catholics.

Between them we might place in succession, according to their respective

degrees of supposed belief, Ribadeneira, Baronius, the Bollandists,

Tillemont, and Fleury. With which of these writers shall we class our

author? certainly neither with Surius, nor with Baillet or Launoy. The

middle links represent those to whom the most liberal Roman Catholic

will not impute too much credulity, or the most credulous too much

freedom. Perhaps our author should rank with the Bollandists, the first

of this middle class; and generally he who thinks with father Papebroke

on any subject of ecclesiastical literature, may be sure of thinking

right. To those who wholly deny the existence of miracles these sheets

are not addressed; but the Roman Catholic may be asked on what principle

he admits the evidence for the miracles of the three first centuries,

and rejects the evidence for the miracles of the middle age; why he

denies to St. Austin, St. Gregory, the venerable Bede, or St. Bernard,

the confidence he places in St. Justin, St. Irenaeus, or Eusebius.

The Lives of the Fathers, Martyrs, and Other Principal Saints. January, February, March · 第 15 / 739 题