Come we now to the next recorded atrocity:--

"There jumped now upon the stage _a red-haired, laughing-hyena

faced, fustian-coated biped_, exclaiming--'My name is Wall! I have

a substantive amendment to move to the resolution now

proposed--('Go off, off! ooh, ooh, ooh! turn him out, out, out!')

We are met in a place where religion is taught (groans). Well,

then, we are met where they "teach the young idea how to

shoot"'--(laughter, groans, and 'Go on, Wall.') Turning to the

young _gents_ on the platform, 'You,' quoth Mr. Wall, 'have not

read history: you clerks at 16s. a week, with your gold chains and

pins.'"

Red hair was first made infamous by JUDAS ISCARIOT; hence the reporter not

only shows the intensity of his Christianity, but his delicate knowledge

of human character, by the fine contempt cast upon the felon locks of the

speaker. Red hair is doubtless the brand of Providence; the mark set upon

guilty man to give note and warning to his unsuspicious fellow-creatures.

Like the scarlet light at the North Foreland, it speaks of shoals, and

sands, and flats. The emperor Commodus, who had all his previous life

rejoiced in flaxen locks, woke, the morning after his first contest in the

arena, a red-haired man! But then, with a fine knowledge of the wholesome

prejudices of the world, he turned the curse upon his head into a beauty;

for he--powdered it with gold-dust. Could Mr. WALL, of the penny theatre,

induce the Master of the Mint to play his _coiffeur_, how would the

reporter fall on his knees and worship the divinity!

Mr. WALL, being of the opposite faction, in addition to the unpowdered

ignominy of his hair, has also the face of a hyena! This fact opens a

question too vast for our one solitary page. We lack at least the

amplitude of a quarto to prove that all men are fashioned, even in the

womb, with features that shall hereafter beautifully harmonise with the

politics of the grown creature. Now WALL, being ordained a poor man and a

Chartist, is endowed with a "laughing hyena" countenance. He even loses

the vantage ground of our common humanity, and is sunk by his poverty and

his politics to the condition of a beast, and of a most unamiable beast

into the bargain. However, the vast enfolding iniquity is yet to be

displayed and duly shuddered at; for _WALL_, the biped hyena, wears--a

fustian coat!

As journalists, we trust we have our common share--which is no little--of

human vanity. Nevertheless, with the highest private opinion of our own

powers, we feel we can add nothing to the picture drawn by the reporter.

The fustian coat, with a tongue in every button-hole, discourses on its

own inwoven infamy.

We recognise with great pleasure a growing custom on the part of political

reporters to merge the orators and listeners at public meetings in their

several articles of dress. This practice has doubtless originated in a

most philosophical consideration of the sympathies between the outer and

the inner man, and has its source in the earliest records of human life.

The patriarchs rent their garments in token of the misery that lacerated

their souls: then rags and tatters were ennobled by sorrow--there was a

deep sentiment in sackcloth and ashes. We have, however, improved upon the

ignorance of primitive days; and though we still admit the covering of man

to be typical of his condition of mind, we wisely keep our respect for

super-Saxony, and expend contempt and ridicule on corduroy and fustian. We

yet hope to see the day when certain political meetings will be briefly

reported as follow:--

"Faded Blue Coat, with tarnished Brass Buttons, took the chair.

"Velveteen Jacket moved the first resolution, which was seconded

by Check Shirt and Ankle-jacks.

"Brown Great Coat, with holes in elbows, moved the second

resolution--seconded by Greasy Drab Breeches and Dirty Leather

Gaiters.

"After thanks to Blue Coat had been moved by Brown Surtout and

Crack under both Arms, the Fustian Jackets departed."

Would not this be quite sufficient? Knowing the philosophy of appearance

in England, might we not by our imagination supply a truer speech to every

orator than could be taken down by the most faithful reporter?

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 1, October 30, 1841 · 第 20 / 49 题