II. The Schools of Tea.

Tea is a work of art and needs a master hand to bring out its

noblest qualities. We have good and bad tea, as we have good and bad

paintings--generally the latter. There is no single recipe for making

the perfect tea, as there are no rules for producing a Titian or a

Sesson. Each preparation of the leaves has its individuality, its

special affinity with water and heat, its own method of telling a story.

The truly beautiful must always be in it. How much do we not suffer

through the constant failure of society to recognise this simple and

fundamental law of art and life; Lichilai, a Sung poet, has sadly

remarked that there were three most deplorable things in the world: the

spoiling of fine youths through false education, the degradation of fine

art through vulgar admiration, and the utter waste of fine tea through

incompetent manipulation.

Like Art, Tea has its periods and its schools. Its evolution may be

roughly divided into three main stages: the Boiled Tea, the Whipped Tea,

and the Steeped Tea. We moderns belong to the last school. These several

methods of appreciating the beverage are indicative of the spirit of the

age in which they prevailed. For life is an expression, our unconscious

actions the constant betrayal of our innermost thought. Confucius said

that "man hideth not." Perhaps we reveal ourselves too much in small

things because we have so little of the great to conceal. The tiny

incidents of daily routine are as much a commentary of racial ideals as

the highest flight of philosophy or poetry. Even as the difference in

favorite vintage marks the separate idiosyncrasies of different periods

and nationalities of Europe, so the Tea-ideals characterise the

various moods of Oriental culture. The Cake-tea which was boiled, the

Powdered-tea which was whipped, the Leaf-tea which was steeped, mark

the distinct emotional impulses of the Tang, the Sung, and the Ming

dynasties of China. If we were inclined to borrow the much-abused

terminology of art-classification, we might designate them respectively,

the Classic, the Romantic, and the Naturalistic schools of Tea.

The tea-plant, a native of southern China, was known from very early

times to Chinese botany and medicine. It is alluded to in the classics

under the various names of Tou, Tseh, Chung, Kha, and Ming, and

was highly prized for possessing the virtues of relieving fatigue,

delighting the soul, strengthening the will, and repairing the eyesight.

It was not only administered as an internal dose, but often applied

externally in form of paste to alleviate rheumatic pains. The Taoists

claimed it as an important ingredient of the elixir of immortality. The

Buddhists used it extensively to prevent drowsiness during their long

hours of meditation.

By the fourth and fifth centuries Tea became a favourite beverage among

the inhabitants of the Yangtse-Kiang valley. It was about this time that

modern ideograph Cha was coined, evidently a corruption of the classic

Tou. The poets of the southern dynasties have left some fragments of

their fervent adoration of the "froth of the liquid jade." Then emperors

used to bestow some rare preparation of the leaves on their high

ministers as a reward for eminent services. Yet the method of drinking

tea at this stage was primitive in the extreme. The leaves were steamed,

crushed in a mortar, made into a cake, and boiled together with rice,

ginger, salt, orange peel, spices, milk, and sometimes with onions!

The custom obtains at the present day among the Thibetans and various

Mongolian tribes, who make a curious syrup of these ingredients. The

use of lemon slices by the Russians, who learned to take tea from the

Chinese caravansaries, points to the survival of the ancient method.

It needed the genius of the Tang dynasty to emancipate Tea from its

crude state and lead to its final idealization. With Luwuh in the middle

of the eighth century we have our first apostle of tea. He was born

in an age when Buddhism, Taoism, and Confucianism were seeking mutual

synthesis. The pantheistic symbolism of the time was urging one to

mirror the Universal in the Particular. Luwuh, a poet, saw in the

Tea-service the same harmony and order which reigned through all things.

In his celebrated work, the "Chaking" (The Holy Scripture of Tea) he

formulated the Code of Tea. He has since been worshipped as the tutelary

god of the Chinese tea merchants.

The "Chaking" consists of three volumes and ten chapters. In the first

chapter Luwuh treats of the nature of the tea-plant, in the second of

the implements for gathering the leaves, in the third of the selection

of the leaves. According to him the best quality of the leaves must have

"creases like the leathern boot of Tartar horsemen, curl like the dewlap

of a mighty bullock, unfold like a mist rising out of a ravine, gleam

like a lake touched by a zephyr, and be wet and soft like fine earth

newly swept by rain."

The fourth chapter is devoted to the enumeration and description of

the twenty-four members of the tea-equipage, beginning with the tripod

brazier and ending with the bamboo cabinet for containing all these

utensils. Here we notice Luwuh's predilection for Taoist symbolism. Also

it is interesting to observe in this connection the influence of tea

on Chinese ceramics. The Celestial porcelain, as is well known, had

its origin in an attempt to reproduce the exquisite shade of jade,

resulting, in the Tang dynasty, in the blue glaze of the south, and the

white glaze of the north. Luwuh considered the blue as the ideal colour

for the tea-cup, as it lent additional greenness to the beverage,

whereas the white made it look pinkish and distasteful. It was because

he used cake-tea. Later on, when the tea masters of Sung took to the

powdered tea, they preferred heavy bowls of blue-black and dark brown.

The Mings, with their steeped tea, rejoiced in light ware of white

porcelain.

In the fifth chapter Luwuh describes the method of making tea.

He eliminates all ingredients except salt. He dwells also on the

much-discussed question of the choice of water and the degree of boiling

it. According to him, the mountain spring is the best, the river water

and the spring water come next in the order of excellence. There are

three stages of boiling: the first boil is when the little bubbles

like the eye of fishes swim on the surface; the second boil is when the

bubbles are like crystal beads rolling in a fountain; the third boil

is when the billows surge wildly in the kettle. The Cake-tea is roasted

before the fire until it becomes soft like a baby's arm and is shredded

into powder between pieces of fine paper. Salt is put in the first boil,

the tea in the second. At the third boil, a dipperful of cold water is

poured into the kettle to settle the tea and revive the "youth of the

water." Then the beverage was poured into cups and drunk. O nectar! The

filmy leaflet hung like scaly clouds in a serene sky or floated like

waterlilies on emerald streams. It was of such a beverage that Lotung, a

Tang poet, wrote: "The first cup moistens my lips and throat, the second

cup breaks my loneliness, the third cup searches my barren entrail but

to find therein some five thousand volumes of odd ideographs. The fourth

cup raises a slight perspiration,--all the wrong of life passes away

through my pores. At the fifth cup I am purified; the sixth cup calls me

to the realms of the immortals. The seventh cup--ah, but I could take

no more! I only feel the breath of cool wind that rises in my sleeves.

Where is Horaisan? Let me ride on this sweet breeze and waft away

thither."

The remaining chapters of the "Chaking" treat of the vulgarity of the

ordinary methods of tea-drinking, a historical summary of illustrious

tea-drinkers, the famous tea plantations of China, the possible

variations of the tea-service and illustrations of the tea-utensils. The

last is unfortunately lost.

The appearance of the "Chaking" must have created considerable sensation

at the time. Luwuh was befriended by the Emperor Taisung (763-779), and

his fame attracted many followers. Some exquisites were said to have

been able to detect the tea made by Luwuh from that of his disciples.

One mandarin has his name immortalised by his failure to appreciate the

tea of this great master.

In the Sung dynasty the whipped tea came into fashion and created the

second school of Tea. The leaves were ground to fine powder in a small

stone mill, and the preparation was whipped in hot water by a delicate

whisk made of split bamboo. The new process led to some change in the

tea-equipage of Luwuh, as well as in the choice of leaves. Salt was

discarded forever. The enthusiasm of the Sung people for tea knew no

bounds. Epicures vied with each other in discovering new varieties, and

regular tournaments were held to decide their superiority. The Emperor

Kiasung (1101-1124), who was too great an artist to be a well-behaved

monarch, lavished his treasures on the attainment of rare species. He

himself wrote a dissertation on the twenty kinds of tea, among which he

prizes the "white tea" as of the rarest and finest quality.

The tea-ideal of the Sungs differed from the Tangs even as their notion

of life differed. They sought to actualize what their predecessors tried

to symbolise. To the Neo-Confucian mind the cosmic law was not reflected

in the phenomenal world, but the phenomenal world was the cosmic law

itself. Aeons were but moments--Nirvana always within grasp. The Taoist

conception that immortality lay in the eternal change permeated all

their modes of thought. It was the process, not the deed, which was

interesting. It was the completing, not the completion, which was really

vital. Man came thus at once face to face with nature. A new meaning

grew into the art of life. The tea began to be not a poetical pastime,

but one of the methods of self-realisation. Wangyucheng eulogised tea

as "flooding his soul like a direct appeal, that its delicate bitterness

reminded him of the aftertaste of a good counsel." Sotumpa wrote of the

strength of the immaculate purity in tea which defied corruption as a

truly virtuous man. Among the Buddhists, the southern Zen sect, which

incorporated so much of Taoist doctrines, formulated an elaborate ritual

of tea. The monks gathered before the image of Bodhi Dharma and

drank tea out of a single bowl with the profound formality of a holy

sacrament. It was this Zen ritual which finally developed into the

Tea-ceremony of Japan in the fifteenth century.

Unfortunately the sudden outburst of the Mongol tribes in the thirteenth

century which resulted in the devastation and conquest of China under

the barbaric rule of the Yuen Emperors, destroyed all the fruits of

Sung culture. The native dynasty of the Mings which attempted

re-nationalisation in the middle of the fifteenth century was harassed

by internal troubles, and China again fell under the alien rule of the

Manchus in the seventeenth century. Manners and customs changed to leave

no vestige of the former times. The powdered tea is entirely forgotten.

We find a Ming commentator at loss to recall the shape of the tea whisk

mentioned in one of the Sung classics. Tea is now taken by steeping the

leaves in hot water in a bowl or cup. The reason why the Western world

is innocent of the older method of drinking tea is explained by the fact

that Europe knew it only at the close of the Ming dynasty.

To the latter-day Chinese tea is a delicious beverage, but not an ideal.

The long woes of his country have robbed him of the zest for the meaning

of life. He has become modern, that is to say, old and disenchanted. He

has lost that sublime faith in illusions which constitutes the eternal

youth and vigour of the poets and ancients. He is an eclectic and

politely accepts the traditions of the universe. He toys with Nature,

but does not condescend to conquer or worship her. His Leaf-tea is often

wonderful with its flower-like aroma, but the romance of the Tang and

Sung ceremonials are not to be found in his cup.

Japan, which followed closely on the footsteps of Chinese civilisation,

has known the tea in all its three stages. As early as the year 729 we

read of the Emperor Shomu giving tea to one hundred monks at his palace

in Nara. The leaves were probably imported by our ambassadors to the

Tang Court and prepared in the way then in fashion. In 801 the monk

Saicho brought back some seeds and planted them in Yeisan. Many

tea-gardens are heard of in succeeding centuries, as well as the delight

of the aristocracy and priesthood in the beverage. The Sung tea reached

us in 1191 with the return of Yeisai-zenji, who went there to study

the southern Zen school. The new seeds which he carried home were

successfully planted in three places, one of which, the Uji district

near Kioto, bears still the name of producing the best tea in the

world. The southern Zen spread with marvelous rapidity, and with it

the tea-ritual and the tea-ideal of the Sung. By the fifteenth century,

under the patronage of the Shogun, Ashikaga-Voshinasa, the tea

ceremony is fully constituted and made into an independent and secular

performance. Since then Teaism is fully established in Japan. The use

of the steeped tea of the later China is comparatively recent among us,

being only known since the middle of the seventeenth century. It has

replaced the powdered tea in ordinary consumption, though the latter

still continues to hold its place as the tea of teas.

It is in the Japanese tea ceremony that we see the culmination of

tea-ideals. Our successful resistance of the Mongol invasion in 1281

had enabled us to carry on the Sung movement so disastrously cut off in

China itself through the nomadic inroad. Tea with us became more than

an idealisation of the form of drinking; it is a religion of the art of

life. The beverage grew to be an excuse for the worship of purity and

refinement, a sacred function at which the host and guest joined to

produce for that occasion the utmost beatitude of the mundane. The

tea-room was an oasis in the dreary waste of existence where

weary travellers could meet to drink from the common spring of

art-appreciation. The ceremony was an improvised drama whose plot was

woven about the tea, the flowers, and the paintings. Not a colour to

disturb the tone of the room, not a sound to mar the rhythm of things,

not a gesture to obtrude on the harmony, not a word to break the

unity of the surroundings, all movements to be performed simply and

naturally--such were the aims of the tea-ceremony. And strangely enough

it was often successful. A subtle philosophy lay behind it all. Teaism

was Taoism in disguise.

The Book of Tea · 第 5 / 10 题