Biographical

Mary Estes Peters was born a slave January 30, 1860 in Missouri

somewhere. Her mother was colored and her father white, the white

parentage being very evident in her color and features and hair. She is

very reticent about the facts of her birth. The subject had to be

approached from many angles and in many ways and by two different

persons before that part of the story could be gotten.

Although she was born in Missouri, she was "refugeed" first to

Mississippi and then here, Arkansas. She is convinced that her mother

was sold at least twice after freedom,--once into Mississippi, one into

Helena, and probably once more after reaching Arkansas, Mary herself

being still a very small child.

I think she is mistaken on this point. I did not debate with her but I

cross-examined her carefully and it appears to me that there was

probably in her mother's mind a confused knowledge of the issuance of

the Emancipation Proclamation in 1862. Lincoln's Compensation

Emancipation plan advocated in March 1863, the Abolition in the District

of Columbia in 1862 in April, the announcement of Lincoln's Emancipation

intention in July 1862, the prohibition of slavery in present and future

territories, June 19, 1862, together with the actual issuance of the

Emancipation in September 1862, and the effectiveness of the

proclamation in January 1, 1863, would well give rise to an impression

among many slaves that emancipation had been completed.

As a matter of fact, Missouri did not secede; the Civil War which

nevertheless ensued would find some slaveholders exposed to the full

force of the 1862 proclamation in 1863 at the time of its first

effectiveness. Naturally it did not become effective in many other

places till 1865. It would very naturally happen then that a sale in

Missouri in the latter part of 1862 or any time thereafter might be well

construed by ex-slaves as a sale after emancipation, especially since

they do not as a rule pay as much attention to the dates of occurrences

as to their sequence. This interpretation accords with the story. Only

such an explanation could make probable a narrative which places the

subject as a newborn babe in 1860 and sold after slavery had ceased

while still too young to remember. Her earliest recollections are

recollections of Arkansas.

She has lived in Arkansas ever since the Civil War and in Little Rock

ever since 1879. She made a living as a seamstress for awhile but is now

unable to sew because of fading eyesight. She married in 1879 and led a

long and contented married life until the recent death of her husband.

She lives with her husband's nephew and ekes out a living by fragmentary

jobs. She has a good memory and a clear mind for her age.

Slave Narratives: A Folk History of Slavery in the United States from Interviews with Former Slaves, Volume II, Arkansas Narratives, Part 5 · 第 170 / 185 题