[186] Dr. Percy, in the notes to the Northumberland Household Book, has

adduced a very curious extract from one of the letters of this Earl of

Northumberland, which he thinks affords a "full vindication of the earl

from the charge of ingratitude in being the person employed to arrest

the cardinal." However this may be, the earl appears to have felt the

embarrassment of his situation; he trembled, and with a faltering voice

could hardly utter the ungracious purport of his mission. To a mind

of any delicacy the office must have been peculiarly distressing, and

even supposing the earl to have been formerly treated in an arbitrary

and imperious manner by the cardinal, it is one which he should have

avoided. As the letter gives a very curious picture of the manners as

well as the literature of our first nobility at that time, I shall

place it in my appendix; the very curious volume in which it is to be

found being of great rarity and value.

[187] "In the houses of our ancient nobility they dined at long tables.

The Lord and his principal guests sate at the upper end of the first

table, in the Great Chamber, which was therefore called the Lord's

Board-end. The officers of his household, and inferior guests, at long

tables below in the hall. In the middle of each table stood a great

salt cellar; and as particular care was taken to place the guests

according to their rank, it became a mark of distinction, whether a

person sate above or below the salt."--_Notes on the Northumberland

Household Book_, p. 419.

[188] The enemies of Archbishop Laud, particularly in the time of

his troubles, were fond of comparing him with Cardinal Wolsey: and a

garbled edition of this life was first printed in the year 1641, for

the purpose of prejudicing that great prelate in the minds of the

people, by insinuating a parallel between him and the cardinal. It is

not generally known that, beside the edition of this life then put

forth, a small pamphlet was also printed with the following title,

"A true Description or rather Parallel betweene Cardinall Wolsey,

Archbishop of York, and William Laud, Archbishop of Canterbury, 1641."

As it is brief, and of extreme rarity, I shall give it a place in the

Appendix.

[189] "But what he did there, I know not." The more recent MS. and Dr.

Wordsworth's edition have this reading.

[190] The words which follow, I apprehend, are part of some

ecclesiastical hymn. It was not unusual to attribute the name of

_Scripture_ to all such compositions; and to whatever was read in

churches. "Also I said and affirmed" (the words are part of the

recantation of a Wickliffite), "that I held no _Scripture_ catholike

nor holy, but onely that is contained in the Bible. For the legends and

lives of saints I held hem nought; and the miracles written of hem, I

held untrue." Fox's _Acts_, p. 591. _W._

[191] "I know not whether or no it be worth the mentioning here

(however we will put it on the adventure), but Cardinal Wolsey, in

his life time was informed by some fortune-tellers, _that he should

have his end at Kingston_. This, his credulity interpreted of Kingston

on Thames; which made him alwayes to avoid the riding through that

town, though the nearest way from his house to the court. Afterwards,

understanding that he was to be committed by the king's express order

to the charge of Sir Anthony [William] Kingston (see Henry Lord Howard

in his Book against Prophecies, chap. 28, fol. 130), it struck to his

heart; too late perceiving himself deceived by that father of lies in

his homonymous prediction." Fuller's _Church History_. Book v. p. 178.

_W._

[192] _where_ for _whereas_.

[193] In the old garbled editions the passage stands thus: "But alas! I

am a diseased man, having a fluxe (at which time it was apparent that

_he had poisoned himself_); it hath made me very weak," p. 108, edit.

1641. This is a most barefaced and unwarranted interpolation. The words

do not occur in any of the MSS. Yet the charge of his having poisoned

himself was repeated by many writers among the reformers without

scruple. See Tindall's _Works_, p. 404. _Supplications to the Queen's

Majesty_, fol. 7. A. D. 1555. Fox's _Acts_, p. 959.

[194] "This is an affecting picture," says a late elegant writer.

"Shakspeare had undoubtedly seen these words, his portrait of the

sick and dying Cardinal so closely resembling this. But in these

words is this chronological difficulty. How is it that Hardwick Hall

is spoken of as a house of the Earl of Shrewsbury's in the reign of

Henry VIII, when it is well known that the house of this name between

Sheffield and Nottingham, in which the Countess of Shrewsbury spent

her widowhood, a house described in the Anecdotes of Painting, and

seen and admired by every curious traveller in Derbyshire, did not

accrue to the possessions of any part of the Shrewsbury family till

the marriage of an earl, who was grandson to the cardinal's host, with

Elizabeth Hardwick, the widow of Sir William Cavendish, in the time of

Queen Elizabeth?--The truth however is, that though the story is told

to every visitor of Hardwick Hall, that "the great child of honour,

Cardinal Wolsey," slept there a few nights before his death; as is

also the story, perhaps equally unfounded, that Mary Queen of Scots

was confined there; it was _another_ Hardwick which received the weary

traveller for a night in this his last melancholy pilgrimage. This

was Hardwick-upon-Line in Nottinghamshire, a place about as far to

the south of Mansfield as the Hardwick in Derbyshire, so much better

known, is to the north-west. It is now gone to much decay, and is

consequently omitted in many maps of the county. It is found in Speed.

Here the Earl of Shrewsbury had a house in the time of Wolsey. Leland

expressly mentions it. "The Erle [of Shrewsbury] hath a parke and

manner place or lodge in it called Hardewike-upon-Line, a four miles

from Newstede Abbey." Itin. vol. v. fol. 94, p. 108. Both the Hardwicks

became afterwards the property of the Cavendishes. Thoroton tells us

that Sir Charles Cavendish, youngest son of Sir William, and father of

William Duke of Newcastle, "had begun to build a great house in this

lordship, on a hill by the forest side, near Annesly-wood-House, when

he was assaulted and wounded by Sir John Stanhope and his men, as he

was viewing the work, which was therefore thought fit to be left off,

some blood being spilt in the quarrel, then very hot between the two

families.--_Thoresby's Edit. of Thoroton_, vol. ii. p. 294."--WHO WROTE

CAVENDISH'S LIFE OF WOLSEY? p. 18.

[195] Mr. Douce has pointed out a remarkable passage in Pittscottie's

History of Scotland (p. 261, edit. 1788,) in which there is a great

resemblance to these pathetic words of the cardinal. James V. imagined

that Sir James Hamilton addressed him thus in a dream. "Though I was a

sinner against God, I failed not to thee. Had I been as good a servant

to the Lord my God as I was to thee, I had not died that death."

[196] In the yeare 1521, the cardinal, by virtue of his legatine

authority, issued a mandate to all the bishops in the realme, to take

the necessary means for calling in and destroying all books, printed

or written, containing any of the errors of Martin Luther: and further

directing processes to be instituted against all the possessors and

favourers of such books, heresies, &c. The mandate contained also a

list of forty-two errors of Luther. See Wilkins's _Concilia_, vol. iii.

p. 690-693; and Strype's _Ecclesiastical Memorials_, vol. i. p. 36-40.

_W._

[197] To administer the _extreme unction_. "The _fyfth sacrament_ is

anoyntynge of seke men, the whiche oyle is halowed of the bysshop, and

mynystred by preestes to them that ben of lawfull age, in grete peryll

of dethe: in lyghtnes and abatynge of theyr sikenes, yf God wyll that

they lyve; and in forgyvynge of theyr venyal synnes, and releasynge of

theyr payne, yf they shal deye." _Festival_, fol. 171. _W._

[198] He died Nov. 29, 1530. Le Neve's _Fasti_, p. 310.

According to the superstitious credulity of that age, the death of

Wolsey was said to have been preceded by a portentous storm. See

LETTERS FROM THE BODLEIAN, Vol. ii. page 17. In a letter from Dr.

Tanner to Dr. Charlett, dated Norwich, Aug. 10, 1709, is the following

passage:

"On the other side is a coeval note at the end of an old MS.

belonging to our cathedral, of the odd exit of the great Cardinal

Wolsey, not mentioned, I think, in Cavendish, or any of the ordinary

historians,--much like Oliver's wind.

"Anno Xti, 1530, nocte immediate sequente quartum diem Novemb. vehemens

ventus quasi per totam Angliam accidebat, et die proximè sequente

quinto sc. die ejusdem mensis circa horam primam post meridiem

captus erat Dūus Thomas Wulsye Cardinalis in ædibus suis de Cahow

[Cawood] infra Diocesam suam Eboracensem; et postea in itinere ejus

versus Londoniam vigilia St. Andreæ prox. sequente apud Leycestriam

moriebatur, quo die ventus quasi Gehennalis tunc fere per totam Angliam

accidebat, cujus vehementia apud Leystoft infra Dioc. Norwicensem et

alibi in diversis locis infra Regnum Angliæ multæ naves perierunt."

_Ad finem Annalium Bartholomæi Cotton. MS. in Biblioth. Eccl. Cath.

Norwic. habetur hæc notata._

[199] The excellent author of the dissertation on this life doubted

whether this passage was not an interpolation, because "Wolsey is

spoken of in terms so different from those used in other parts of the

book." But it is only a proof of the integrity of the biographer, whose

upright heart and devout catholic spirit would not conceal the truth.

[200] This passage follows in the more recent MSS. "riding that same

day, being Wednesday, to Northampton; and the next day to Dunstable;

and the next day to London; where we tarried untill St. Nicholas Even,

and then we rode to Hampton Court."

[201] Here is another addition, in the more recent MSS. to the

following effect: "Who hath gotten diverse other rich ornaments into

his hands, the which be not rehersed or registered in any of my lords

books of inventory, or other writings, whereby any man is able to

charge him therewith, but only I."

ADDITIONAL NOTES TO THE LIFE OF WOLSEY.

PAGE 95. The Letter of Anstis, referred to in the note, is addressed

to Fiddes, and is printed in his Collections. It relates to a rude

representation of the House of Lords in the reign of King Henry VIII.

but that learned herald and antiquary has made it the vehicle of some

observations, which may not be misplaced here.

"Almost every action of Wolsey hath been interpreted as an instance of

pomp, ambition, or insolence; notwithstanding, probably, upon a strict

examination, most of them will be found to be strictly precedented.

This particular of _two crosses_ gave Polydore Virgil an opportunity

of making an uncharitable reflection: "Non contentus unâ cruce, qua

utebatur, quod Archiepiscopus esset Eboracensis, alteram præ se

ferri voluit, per duos sacerdotes statura elegantes, et equis magnis

insidentes, qui aperto capite, quocunque anni tempore incederent. Nunc

plane constat Wolsæum suæ sibi conscium esse culpæ, qui propterea

binas in pompa habet cruces, quod una non satis foret ad ejus expianda

commissa." Anstis then cites the passage from Roy's satire, which he

mistakingly attributes to Skelton; and proceeds thus: "Here is a long

catalogue, and yet possibly not one particular is singular to the

cardinal. For the same honours, according to the known customs of Rome,

were to be paid to every Legate _de Latere_ as to the sovereign pontiff

himself: Nay, he might of right use all papal ensigns and ornaments,

for which Parisius (De Resignat. L. 7. qu. 13. n. 6 et 7) produces the

vouchers."

"I know not what was the figure of the _pillars_ here mentioned; but it

was not an unusual ensign, because Chaucer, in the Plowman's Tale, v.

2044, setting forth the duty of a clergyman, says thus:

And usin none yerthly honours,

Ne croune, ne curious covertours,

Ne _pillar_, ne other proud pall, &c.

According to the present customs in this country, no one will charge

the cardinal's riding on a mule to be a mark of his insolence or

haughtiness, neither was it any testimony of his humility, but a usage

of his age, in correspondence to the ancient practice of clergymen, who

esteemed it unbecoming them to ride upon a horse, when our Saviour rode

on the foal of an ass. Thus St. Basil on Psalm 32, _Exclusus est ab usu

sanctorum equus_. And here I cannot forbear from diverting you with the

odd simplicity of the style wherein Peraldus (Summæ de Superbia, tom.

2) expresses himself on this occasion: "Christus nunquam equitavit,

tantum semel asinavit, atque adeo neque mulavit, neque palafredavit,

neque dromedariavit." His sentiment was as of some other rigid

disciplinarians at that time, that the clergy should travel on foot.

It is well known that our judges, till the first year of Queen Mary,

rode always to Westminster on mules, (v. Dugdal. Orig. Juridic. p. 38).

Christopher Urswicke, who had been Dean of Windsor, in his will made

10 Oct. 1521, devises to Mr. Cuthbert Tunstall, Maister of the Rolls,

"his gowne of blacke furred with martron, his typpet of sarcenet furred

with sables, and his little _mule_ with saddle and bridle and all hir

harneys." (Lib. Mainwaryng, in Cur. Prærog.) And upon the motive of

an affected humility it doubtless was that John de Beverle, in his

will dated 1380, "Volo quod corpus meum sit ductum ab hospitio meo

per duos asinos, si possint inveniri." (Registr. Beckingham Episcopi

Lincoln.) The sumptuary law for apparel, 24 Hen. 8. c. 13, prohibits

all persons to wear upon their horse, _mule_, or other beast, any silk

of purpure, &c. Of the custom of the clergy, see Bede Eccles. Hist. 1.

3, c. 14, and 1. 4, c. 3: and that they first began to ride on mares,

1. 2, c. 13, unless there be some error in the print. As to Cardinals,

David Chambre, in his History of the Popes abridged, acquaints us that

Innocent IV. gave them liberty to ride on horseback, and that Pope

Clement V. ordained they should ride upon asses, according to the

example of our Saviour.

But these rich trappings and housings of the cardinal's mule may give

offence; herein he could justify himself by an especial privilege to

those of his degree:--_Equitare mulas phaleratas, et clavam argenteam

ante se deferre_ (Cohelii Notitia Cardinalatus, p. 28). Here then is

a poleaxe or mace also, and the same author, p. 30, acquaints us that

in the Roman court the cardinals "dum equitant _mulas_, præmittunt

apparitores cum argenteis _clavis_ et _bulgis_ ab acupictoribus

gentilitiis insignibus auro et argento redimitis, necnon famulos duos

pedissequos (parafrænarios vocant) baculis duobus innixos."

Page 137. The circumstances attending the interception of De Praet's

dispatches, mentioned in the note, are thus related in a letter of

Wolsey's to Mr. Sampson, printed in the Appendix to Galt's Life of

Wolsey, p. clv. No. vi. 4to. 1812.

"It hath bene of a long season, and from sundry parts, reported unto

the king's hignes and to me at divers times, that Mon^{sr} de Praet,

who resideth here ambassador for the emperor, hath continually bene a

man disposed and inclined to make, in his letters and writings, both

to the emperor and the Lady Margaret, seditious and sinister reports;

saying many times, upon his own fantasie, suspicion, and conjecture,

things clearly untrue, and compassing at other times, when things have

been done, sayd, or set forth, frendly, kindlie, and lovinglie, soe

to cowch his reports, and the circumstances of the doings thereof, as

though the gratuities shewed by the king's highnes, have from time to

time been conduced by the industrie, pollicy, and labour of the sayd

ambassadors; ascribing, therefore, the laude and thank therof unto

himself, wherby he might acquire the more grace and favor of the sayd

emperor and Lady Margaret. To these things the kings highnes and I

were not over hasty to give soone creddence; but supposing the sayd

ambassador to be a p^rsonage of more vertue and inclinacion to good

then now he proveth to be, I would some times admonish him, in general

words of such advertisement; exhorting and advising him to be well

ware how he, being a minister betwene two princes so neerly conjoined

in intelligence, should attempt or doe any thing to the hinderance

thereof; but rather, regarding the office of a good ambassador to doe

that in him is for the nourishing and increase of the same. Wherein he

alwayes made me such answere that I conceaved noe further suspicion or

jealousy towards him in that behalfe; being therefore the more franke

and plaine with him in all my conferences, as he, that for the singuler

good mind which I have alwayes borne unto the emperors honor, weale,

and suretie, would procede with his majestie, sincerelie, plainely,

and truelie. And as familiarly, kindly, and lovinglie hath the kings

highnes and I admitted, entertayned, and used the sayd de Praet at

all times, as the most hearty love betwene the kings highnes and his

majestie doth require, making him privie, and having him present,

at all such comunicacions and accesses have bene of other princes

ambassadors, or of any matter worthy advertisement or knowledge, to the

intent that he should make most credible and plaine relacion thereof

unto th'emperor and other to whom it appertained."

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * He then relates, that upon one occasion he

sent for the ambassador "to make him participant of such newes as

the kings highnes and I had received, as also to understand whether

he had any good newes in confirmation of the same." And after a long

communication, he "seeming to be joyous and well contented, giving me

thanks on the emperors behalfe, departed."

"Three days before that, as many times is here accustomed, it was

appointed that, as that night following, which was the xj^{th} day

at night, a privie watch should be made in London, and by a certaine

cercoute and space about it: in the which watch was taken, passing

between London and Brainford, by certaine of the watch appointed to

that quarter, one ryding towards the said Brainford; who, examined

by the watch, answered soe closely, that upon suspicion thereof they

searched him, and found seacretly hid about him a little pacquet of

letters, subscribed in French, which the sayd watch p^rceaving, brought

the letters unto a man of lawes clarke, being of the same company;

who, supposing the bearer of them to be either a spie or a messenger

from some merchant, stranger, or other, intendinge to disclose things

unto the emperor, and p^rceaving the sayd pacquet to be in the taking

of it, by the unlearned men of the watch, broken and evil handled,

looked in the letters. And thinking the same, by reason of the ciphers,

more suspect, brought it unto the king's solicitor, being in the same

watch; who not acquainted with the name of the sayd de Praet, brought

the letters soe opened unto Sir Thomas Moore, being in another watch

neere unto the same; and he presented them, in the morning following,

unto me, being in the chancery at Westminster; which, when I had read,

knowing how farr the effect of them was discrepant from the truth, anon

I conceived the former adv^rtisements made unto me touching the said

ambassadors accustomed usage in making sinister reports, to be true.

And p^rceyving by the sayd letters, that albeit the usage is not here

that strangers should passe through the realme without a passport,

yet one of the foulkes was depeched by the sayd ambassador the day

before with letters towards Spaine,--wherin it was like there might be

as evill or worse report then in these, I with all diligence sent to

countermande the sayd former letters, or any other depeched at that

time by the sayd ambassador. And soe was taken also a pacquet of his

letters directed to my Lady Margaret, which original letters directed

unto th'emperor, with copies of those addressed unto my Lady Margaret,

viewed and overlooked, and the untruth mencioned in them deprehended,

I send unto your hands herewith, as well because th'emperor may know

such things as his folkes on this side doe advertise his majestie of,

which may conferr to the furtherance of his affaires; as also, because

the same may hereby the more assuredlie and p^rfectlie understand

and p^rceave that the sayd de Praet hath of lykelyhood contrived noe

few matters untrue and fayned in his letters sent of a long season,

as well into Spayne as into Flanders. Wherof there is much apparance,

by reason of such proceeding, strange demeanour, and suspicion, as

hath seemed to have bene had towards the kings grace, both on that

side and in Flanders of a good season, soe that it is evident to be

conjectured that the sayd de Praet hath done more hurt, detriment, and

damage, by his evil reports in the comon affaires, then ever he can

be able to reduble or amend; and surely has by the same deserved much

more blame than I will reherse." He then enters into detail of the

misrepresentations of De Praet, who, he says, would have long since

been denounced to the emperor as "a man of insufficient qualities,

inexpert and far unmeet to be ambassador from so great a prince," had

it not been out of courtesy to that potentate and his council. And

further, that "De Praet being not a little abashed, ne without cause,

made first exception at the intercepting of his letters, as he would

not give credence to the manner of their interception, and the opening

of them by a fortunate error, as is aforesayd, saying that ambassadors

doe write unto their princes that which in their conceipt is thought

good, referring the judgment unto others. He affirmed also, that till

this time it could not ne should be ever found in any of his letters,

that he hath made evill report either of the king's highnes or of me,

as by his original letters, which he sayd he desired and would be gladd

should and might be showed, he would be judged, and that the cause and

occasion moving him thus to write at this time, was only the being here

of John Joachym by viij moneths, the difficulty made to condescend unto

the truce proposed at Rome, the not advancing of an army on this side,

as was spoken of, and the refusal of the kings highnes to contribute

any thing to the defence of Italy."

To this Wolsey states the long and circumstantial answer he gave, in

which he asserts that he was not privy to Joachinos coming, and that

it was some time after his arrival that he disclosed to him what he

was, and that as soon as he discovered himself to be sent from the Lady

Regent, he made de Praet privy thereto, praying him to advertise the

Lady Margaret and the emperor, as he also would do and did.

To this he states 'that De Praet could make no other answer than that

he wrote his fantasy, and remitted the judgment to wiser men.' The

whole letter is well worth attention as an example of Wolsey's talent

in diplomacy; and though his apology is not very convincing, it must be

confessed to be very skilful and ingenious.

FINIS.

APPENDIX.

EXTRACTS FROM THE LIFE

OF

THE VIRTUOUS CHRISTIAN AND RENOWNED

QUEEN ANNE BOLEIGNE.

BY GEORGE WYATT, ESQ.

WRITTEN AT THE CLOSE OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY.

FROM THE MANUSCRIPT COLLECTIONS OF THE REV. JOHN LEWIS.

Great princes favourites their fair leaves spread,

But as the marigold at the sun's eye;

And in themselves their pride lies buried,

For at a frown they in their glory die.

SHAKSPEARE.

The Life of Cardinal Wolsey · 第 24 / 32 段