produced anaesthetic effects similar to those of nitrous oxide; and
this property of ether was also shown by the American physicians,
John D. Godman (1822), James Jackson (1833), Wood and Bache (1834).
These observations, however, appear to have been regarded
in the light of mere scientific curiosities and subjects for
lecture- room experiment, rather than as facts capable of
being applied practically in the treatment of disease, till
December 1844, when Dr Horace Wells, a dentist of Hartford,
Connecticut, underwent in his own person the operation
of tooth-extraction while rendered insensible by nitrous
oxide. Satisfied, from further experience, that teeth could
be extracted in this way without pain, Dr Wells proposed
to establish the practice of painless dentistry under the
influence of the gas; but in consequence of an unfortunate
failure in an experiment at Boston he abandoned the project.
On the 30th of September 1846 Dr W. T. G. Morton, a dentist
of Boston, employed the vapour of ether to procure general
anaesthesia in a case of tooth-extraction, and thereafter
administered it in cases requiring surgical operation with
complete success. This great achievement marked a new era in
surgery. Operations were performed in America in numerous
instances under ether inhalation, the result being only to
establish more firmly its value as a successful anaesthetic.
The news of the discovery reached England on the 17th of December
1840. On the 19th of December Mr Robinson, a dentist in
London, and on the 21st Robert Liston, the eminent surgeon,
operated on patients anaesthetized by ether; and the practice
soon became general both in Great Britain and on the continent.
Sir James Simpson was the first to apply anaesthesia by
ether to midwifery practice; this he did in 1847, and
found that the pains of labour could be abolished without
interference with uterine contractions or injury to the
child. On the 8th of March 1847 M. J. P. Flourens read a
paper before the Academie des Sciences on the effect of
chloroform on the lower animals, but no notice was taken
of what has since proved to be a discovery of epoch-making
importance. In November of the same year Simpson announced
his discovery of the anaesthetic properties of chloroform, the
trial of which had been suggested to him by Waldie, a chemist of
Liverpool. As the result, chloroform came to be widely used
instead of ether, though it was found by several casualties
that it was not the absolutely safe anaesthetic that had
at first been hoped. It, however, remained the drug that
was chiefly used till Dr J. T. Clover (1825-1882) of London
introduced his regulating ether-inhaler in 1876, embodying
a new principle--that of limiting the quantity of air during
etherization and regulating the strength of the vapour.
During the intervening period, as the results of the labours of
John Snow, Sir Benjamin Ward Richardson, Thomas Nunnely, and Colton
amongst others, several drugs were found to possess anaesthetic
properties. Of these one, ethyl chloride, which was speedily
given up, has come into deserved prominence at the present time;
and another, nitrous oxide, which had been lost sight of since
Wells's failure at Boston, was reintroduced, and it became and
has remained the most popular anaesthetic in dental practice.
Since 1876 no new drugs have been introduced; the progress
has been in the direction of improvements in the technique of
anaesthetization. The most important of these is the
administration of oxygen with nitrous oxide, resulting from
the recognition of the fact that this drug does not owe its
anaesthetic properties to partial asphyxia, as was thought
till the contrary was shown by Edmund Andrews of Chicago in
1868. It was not till twenty years later that this knowledge
was put to practical use, when F. W. Hewett introduced
his regulating stopcock, which enabled the anaesthetist to
exhibit the nitrous oxide and oxygen in such proportions as
were demanded by the patient's condition. At the present
time the anaesthetics in common use are the following:--
(1) Nitrous oxide gas, or laughing gas, N2O. This is a
colourless, odourless gas, which for convenience is carried
about in liquid form in iron cylinders. When about to be used,
it is allowed to escape into a large rubber bag, connected
with a closely- fitting face-piece, which covers up the nose
and mouth, and allows of inspiration only from the bag of
gas, expiration being into the air. When thus given the
patient is exposed to a certain degree of asphyxia. This
asphyxia is not only not necessary but is harmful, and may
be obviated by giving oxygen in small amounts simultaneously
by means of Hewett's regulating stopcock. This drug is used
chiefly for dental operations, and for minor surgery where
absolute muscular relaxation is not required. When mixed
with oxygen, it can he given if necessary for an hour or
longer. It has an induction period of a few breaths only,
and the recovery is as a rule unaccompanied by excitement or
nausea. It is also used as a preliminary to ether; the gas
is given till unconsciousness is reached, the unpleasant
taste of the ether being thus avoided and the induction
period shortened. The mortality from nitrous oxide is
small, and from the gas and oxygen in expert hands nil.
(2) Ethyl chloride, C2H5Cl, a colourless liquid of a pleasant
odour, boiling at 12.5 deg. C. It is used in the same class
of operations as the last anaesthetic. It is best given in
an apparatus that consists of a mask closely adapted to the
face, and a rubber bag of small capacity, with which is
connected the bottle containing the ethyl chloride. The vapour
supplied from the bottle is breathed backwards and forwards
from the bag, fresh air being admitted in small quantities
only. The period of induction is shorter than in the case of
nitrous oxide, the patient losing consciousness in two or three
breaths; the stage of recovery is not so uniformly pleasant,
headache, nausea and vomiting occurring not infrequently.
It is difficult at present to estimate the mortality, as
it has only recently come into general use, but it seems to
occupy an intermediate position between ether and chloroform.
(3) Ether, or ethyl oxide, (C2H5)2O, a colourless, volatile
liquid, boiling at 36.5 deg. C. It has a pungent odour. It is best
administered, as in the case of ethyl chloride, by limiting the
amount of air during inhalation. The induction is much slower
than in the case of the last two drugs, and it is accompanied
by a feeling of suffocation, owing to the pungent odour of the
ether. On that account the anaesthetic is best started with
nitrous oxide or ethyl chloride. The recovery is always
marked by some nausea and very frequently by vomiting. The
mortality is small during the actual operation, but fatalities
from respiratory complications later on are not uncommon.
(4) Chloroform, CHCl3, a colourless liquid of a penetrating
odour, boiling at 63 deg. C. It is administered in such a way
as to ensure the free admixture of air. To secure this
the face-piece must be loosely-fitting, and the strength of
the vapour so gradually increased that the patient is never
inconvenienced or impelled to hold the breath. The induction
is slow, occupying two or more minutes, but it is not at all
unpleasant; nausea and vomiting during recovery are rarer
than in the case of ether, but if they do occur they last
longer. The mortality on the table is about 1 in 2500.
The question as to which is the better anaesthetic, ether
or chloroform, for long operations, is a moot point. In
the hands of an experienced anaesthetist there is probably
nothing to choose as regards safety, and the anaesthetic
advantages of the latter are incontestable. In the hands of
the less-experienced anaesthetist, ether is the more suitable
drug. At the extremes of life, chloroform is well taken,
as it is also by women in labour, and it is indicated where
there has been recent inflammation of the air passages. In
operations, too, about the mouth, chloroform must be the drug
used, as a closely-fitting mask is obviously impossible.
The introduction by inhalation of any of the above drugs into
the organism produces an anaesthesia, the degree of which at
any moment varies directly as the amount or tension of the
vapour in the blood, and therefore also as the tension of
the vapour in the inspired air. The organism in this case
may be compared to an electric lamp, of which the voltage
is, say 100; a current of any less voltage will only produce
a red heat, however many amperes are forced through; with
the voltage at 100 the filament will be white hot, at over
100 the filament will fuse. So with these drugs: with the
vapour at a low tension a certain low depth of anaesthesia
is obtained; if the administrator increases the tension,
true surgical anaesthesia is produced; if he increases it
again, the filament fuses and the patient dies. This is the
principle which guides the anaesthetist; it is the quality of
the vapour that decides the depth of the anaesthesia, not the
quantity. An infinite quantity of chloroform may be absorbed
with impunity if the tension be low, but a few drops will
kill if the tension be high. For practical purposes four
degrees of anaesthesia are described, through which a patient
passes from unconsciousness to (in the last resort) death:--
(1) A state of disordered consciousness, with analgesia;
the patient's ideas are confused, the special senses are
disturbed, and though the application of stimuli to the
skin causes no mental impression, yet in response to
them there may be what look like purposeful movements.
(2) In the second stage there is complete loss of consciousness;
and though the reflexes persist, the movements in response to
the stimuli are purposeless. The muscles generally act strongly.
(3) The stage of surgical anaesthesia; there is a
general muscular relaxation, with the loss of many of the
reflexes, i.e. an operation may be performed without
evoking any movement on the part of the patient, while
the vital reflexes and the vital centres in the medulla
are still active, and the heart muscle is not paralysed.
(4) Finally, the stage of paralysis of the medulla, when
the respiratory and circulatory centres are paralysed,
and the heart muscle itself is poisoned and death ensues.
The aim of the anaesthetist is to keep the patient in the
third degree of anaesthesia, thus avoiding the movements
of the second and the dangers of the fourth; he therefore
keeps the patient under close observation, and by watching
the respiration, pulse and facial aspect, is able to judge
the condition of the respiration and circulation. He has
a further guide in the lid- reflex, i.e. the movement of
the eyelid when the globe is touched; this and the size of
the pupil tell him to what extent the central nervous system
is depressed and complete the information he requires.
It will have been observed that the administration of
the above drugs is by inhalation, and has to be continued
throughout the operation, the reason being that all the drugs
are as rapidly excreted as they are absorbed, especially
by the lungs, and therefore no other method would be of any
avail. That there are drugs which are sufficiently slowly
eliminated to allow of an operation being performed between
the moment of induction and that of recovery, cannot be
doubted, and their discovery and use can only be a matter of
time. Even at the present time there is one, urethane,
which, if injected with a hypodermic needle, soon produces
a profound general anaesthesia. It has only been used
on the lower animals, as its depressing effect on the
respiratory centre contra-indicates its use in human beings.
Local Anaesthesia.--Much attention has recently been devoted
to the discovery of methods by which the insensibility may be
confined to the area of operation and the loss of consciousness
avoided. Such a procedure has been common for many years
for small operations, but it is only lately that it has
been successfully applied to the severer ones. It is very
doubtful whether local anaesthesia will ever replace general
in the latter class. Though the preliminary starvation is
avoided, and the patient has the shock of operation alone to
recover from, without the cardiac depression resulting from
the anaesthetic during the operation, the patient, unless
of a very apathetic temperament, is in that state of severe
nervous strain, when any unexpected movement or remark, or
sight of a soiled instrument, may produce an alarming or fatal
syncope. The earliest local anaesthetic was cold, produced
by a mixture of ice and salt. In place of this cumbersome
method, the skin is now frozen by means of a fine spray of
ether or ethyl chloride directed upon it. The spraying is
discontinued when the skin becomes white, and it is then
allowed to regain its colour. The moment this occurs the
incision is made and will be quite painless. The recovery,
like that from any other frost-bite, is very painful, and
the time during which an operation can be done is very short;
consequently this method has been very largely superseded by
the use of drugs. The drugs chiefly used are cocaine and its
derivatives. Cocaine has by far the highest anaesthetic
properties; it is, however, in certain individuals a most
powerful cardiac depressant and has caused numerous fatalities,
and further, it cannot be sterilized by heat, as it undergoes
decomposition. Eucaine has now largely taken its place,
though its anaesthetic properties are less; it is, however,
less toxic, and can be sterilized by heat. In combination
with these drugs there is usually given some of the extract
of the suprarenal body of the sheep; this substance increases
and prolongs the anaesthetic effect by constricting the
blood-vessels, the result of which is to reduce the haemorrhage,
and also to prevent the too rapid absorption of the drug into
the general system, confining it to the area of operation.
The chief methods of bringing about local anaesthesia are as follows:--
(1) Painting or spraying a solution of the drugs
on to the area on which it is proposed to operate.
(2) Injection by means of a needle of the
solution into the skin and the deeper structures.
(3) Spinal analgesia. The method of inducing analgesia by injecting
solutions into the sheath surrounding the spinal cord was devised
by Bier in 1898, and for the purpose he employed a solution of
cocaine. It was found, however, that there was considerable
danger with this drug, so the method was not adopted to any
great extent, until Fourneau discovered stovaine in 1904.
The principle involved in spinal anaesthesia is this: that a
substance in solution is injected into the sac containing the
spinal cord in the lumbar region. The spinal cord as such
ends at the level of the first lumbar vertebra in a leash of
nerves termed the cauda equina. When giving an injection
there is little danger of injuring these nerves because in
this situation there is a space filled with fluid between the
wall of the sac and the nerves. The substances injected, by
virtue of their specific action on nervous tissues, cause loss
of painful sensations in the lower limbs and for a variable
distance up the trunk. It has been found that the specific
gravity of the solution injected has some influence on the
height to which the analgesia will extend up the trunk, and this
distance can also be controlled by altering the position of the
patient. The canal in which the cord is situated is not a
straight tube, but is curved backwards in the sacral and upper
dorsal regions, and forwards in the lower dorsal and lumbar
regions. Therefore with the patient lying on his back, any
solution injected that has a greater specific gravity than
that of the cerebrospinal fluid which bathes the cord, tends
to gravitate towards the sacral and upper dorsal regions;
and, conversely, any solution of lower specific gravity than
that of the cerebrospinal fluid tends to rise and produce
analgesia at a still higher level. In this way the situation
of the fluid producing analgesia can be controlled to some
extent. It has been found that a very serious danger exists
if the solution passes up to the brain, or even if it passes
higher than the sixth cervical nerve. It is important that
the osmotic pressure of the solutions employed should be as
nearly as possible that of the cerebrospinal fluid, that is to
say, the nearer the solution is isotonic with the cerebrospinal
fluid, the better will be the analgesia, and the less will
be the harmful effects. At present it has not been found
possible to separate in any of the substances employed the
radicle which produces motor effects from that which blocks
the advent of sensory stimuli. Although both effects last
only a short time there seems to be a certain risk due to
the temporary muscular paralysis, and in a patient with a
tendency to bronchitis this is a matter of considerable moment.
The fluid is injected in the following manner. A puncture
is made with a special trocar and canula in the lumbar region
between the second and third or third and fourth lumbar
spines. The sheath of the sac having been entered, as is
evidenced by the loss of resistance to the point of the
trocar, and by the fact that cerebrospinal fluid escapes
when the trocar is withdrawn, the dose of the fluid selected
is injected through the canula, which is then withdrawn.
An important point is that the operation must be absolutely
aseptic; great care is taken to sterilize thoroughly the
instruments, site of operation and fluid used. The patient
is placed in that position which will yield the best and
safest analgesia for the operation; it is essential, however,
that the patient's head be raised well above the level of the
spine. The injection is followed very quickly, generally
within three to five minutes, by the production of analgesia,
which lasts for a period varying from half an hour to two
hours. Various substances have been used for the injection,
of which the following are the chief --tropacocaine, stovaine,
novocaine, cocaine, eucaine and alypin. All of these have
been combined with adrenalin hydrochloride with a view to
limiting their action in one degree or another; and also
with other inert substances in such quantity as will produce
isotonic solutions of relatively high specific gravity.
The points in favour of this method of producing analgesia are
as follows: (a) The patient is not rendered unconscious, and
is often able to assist at his own operation, such as by coughing
or moving his limbs in any way as may be desired. (b) There
are no troublesome after-effects, such as nausea, vomiting and
thirst. (c) The formation of haematoma is less frequent. (d)
Surgical shock is considerably lessened, especially in such
operations as amputations and severe abdominal emergencies.
(e) The risk attending a general anaesthetic is avoided.
The disadvantages at present attending the method are:
(a) A severe form of headache may sometimes follow, but
this has seemed to depend on the kind of fluid injected,
and in the recent cases has not been so frequent as in the
early ones. (b) The paralysis of muscles. In a very few
cases this has been permanent. The temporary paralysis of
the muscles of respiration is apt to be a serious matter.
(c) Occasionally incontinence of urine and faeces occurs;
this, however, has not been permanent except in a few of the
earlier cases. (d) The uncertainty of the method, so that
the analgesia is not always as complete as is desirable.
(e) The analgesia for safety must be limited to a line
below the level of the second rib in front. (f) The use of
the Trendelenburgh position is impossible, or indeed the use
of any position which involves lowering the patient's head.
It would appear that the method undoubtedly has its uses, and that
it will take its place in surgery and find its proper level. A
large amount of work is being done on the subject, with a view
of determining the limitations and possibilities of the method,
the best kind of substance to use and the proper dose to employ.
Finally, a large number of operations have been performed under
a local anaesthesia produced by hypnotism (q.v.), but this
is a method that can only be used on selected cases. (H. C. C.)
ANAGNIA [mod. Anagni; pop. (1901) 10,059], an ancient
town of the Hernici, situated on a hill (1558 ft.) above the
valley of the Trerus and the Via Labicana (the post-station
3 m. below the town, from which a branch road ascended to
it, was Compitum Anagninum, which was 40 m. E.S.E. of Rome:
see T. Ashby, in Papers of the British School at Rome, i.
215). In 1880 a pre-Aryan grave was found between the town
and the river, with a skeleton painted red, stone implements
and a bronze dagger. After the Italian immigration, its
position in a fertile district soon gave it importance,
and it became the seat of the assembly of the Hernican
towns. In the War of 306 B.C. it was conquered by Q.
Marcius Tremulus and lost its independence. Its inhabitants
had certainly acquired Roman citizenship before the Social
War and it continued to be a municipium throughout the Roman
period. It was besieged by the Saracens in 877, but in the
11th century was a place of considerable importance, the
Conti and Gaetani being the chief families; Pope Boniface
VIII., a member of the latter, was there made prisoner in
1303. The ancient city walls are in some points still
existing, in others they have been much restored; they are
built of rectangular blocks of porous limestone about 1 1/2ft.
high. On the north of the town they are especially
well-preserved, and at one point the area within them is
slightly extended by a terrace supported by three lofty
pillars. Within the city there are no ancient remains, except
some massive substruction walls which supported buildings on the
hillside. The present town still preserves in parts its
medieval aspect. The cathedral, constructed in 1074 at the
summit of the hill, is externally plain; it has a fine Gothic
interior, somewhat spoilt by restoration, with a good Cosmati
pavement, and a canopy and paschal candlestick in the same
style. The crypt contains frescoes of the 13th century,
and in the treasury are valuable vestments. Lower down
is the Palazzo Civico, belonging to the 11th or early 12th
century, which is supported on arches of a single span, under
which the road passes. Its posterior facade is fine. Pope
Adrian IV. (Nicholas Breakspeare) died here, and there is
a chapel of St Thomas Becket in the crypt of the cathedral.
See L. Pigorini, in Bullettino di Paletnologia Italiana (1880,
8 seq.); J. Kulakowski, in Atti del Congresso Internazionale
di Scienze Storiche (Rome, 1904), v. 673 seq. (T. As.)
ANAGRAM (Gr. ana, back, and grafein, to write), the
result of transposing the letters of a word or words in such
a manner as to produce other words that possess meaning. The
construction of anagrams is an amusement of great antiquity,
its invention being ascribed without authority to the Jews,
probably because the later Hebrew writers, particularly the
Kabbalists, were fond of it, asserting that ``secret mysteries
are woven in the numbers of letters.'' Anagrams were known to
the Greeks and also to the Romans, although the known Latin
examples of words of more than one syllable are nearly all
imperfect. They were popular throughout Europe during the
middle ages and later, particularly in France, where a certain
Thomas Billon was appointed ``anagrammatist to the king''
by Louis XIII. W. Camden (Remains, 7th ed., 1674) defines
``Anagrammatisme'' as ``a dissolution of a name truly written
into his letters, as his elements, and a new connection of it
by artificial transposition, without addition, subtraction or
change of any letter, into different words, making some perfect
sence applyable to the person named.'' Dryden disdainfully
called the pastime the ``torturing of one poor word ten
thousand ways,'' but many men and women of note have found
amusement in it. A well-known anagram is the change of Ave
Maria, gratia plena, Dominus tecum into Virgo serena, pia,
munda et immaculata. Among others are the anagrammatic
answer to Pilate's question, ``Quid est veritas''--namely,
``Est vir qui adest''; and the transposition of ``Horatio
Nelson'' into ``Honor est a Nilo''; and of ``Florence
Nightingale'' into ``Flit on, cheering angel.'' James I.'s
courtiers discovered in ``James Stuart'' ``A just master,''
and converted ``Charles James Stuart'' into ``Claimes Arthur's
seat.'' ``Eleanor Audeley,'' wife of Sir John Davies, is said
to have been brought before the High Commission in 1634 for
extravagances, stimulated by the discovery that her name could
be transposed to ``Reveale, O Daniel,'' and to have been laughed
out of court by another anagram submitted by the dean of the
Arches, ``Dame Eleanor Davies,'' ``Never soe mad a ladie.''
There must be few names that could furnish so many anagrams
as that of ``Augustus de Morgan,'' who tells that a friend
had constructed about 800 on his name, specimens of which
are given in his Budget of Paradoxes, P. 82. The pseudonyms
adopted by authors are often transposed forms, more or less
exact, of their names; thus ``Calvinus'' becomes ``Alcuinus'';
``Francois Rabelais,'' ``Alcofribas Nasier''; ``Bryan Waller
Proctor,'' ``Barry Cornwall, poet''; ``Henry Rogers,'' ``R.
E. H. Greyson,'' &c. It is to be noted that the last two
are impure anagrams, an ``r'' being left out in both cases.
``Telliamed,'' a simple reversal, is the title of a well
known work by ``De Maillet.'' The most remarkable pseudonym
of this class is the name ``Voltaire,'' which the celebrated
philosopher assumed instead of his family name, ``Francois
Marie Arouet,'' and which is now generally allowed to be an
anagram of ``Arouet, l.j.,'' that is, Arouet the younger.
Perhaps the only practical use to which anagrams have been
turned is to be found in the transpositions in which some of
the astronomers of the 17th century embodied their discoveries
with the design apparently of avoiding the risk that, while
they were engaged in further verification, the credit of what
they had found out might be claimed by others. Thus Galileo
announced his discovery that Venus had phases like the moon in
the form, ``Haec immatura a me jam feustra leguntur--oy,''
that is, ``Cynthiae figuras aemulatur Mater Amorum.''
Another species of anagram, called ``palindrome'' (Cr. palin,
back, and dromos, running), is a word or sentence which
may be read backwards as well as forwards, letter by letter,
while preserving the same meaning; for example, the words
``Anna,'' ``noon,'' ``tenet,'' or the sentence with which Adam
is humorously supposed to have greeted Eve: ``Madam, I'm Adam!''
A still more complicated variety is the ``logogram'' (Gr.
logos, word), a versified puzzle containing several
words derived from recombining the letters of the original
word, the difficulty lying in the fact that synonyms of the
derived words may be used. Thus, if the original word be
``curtain,'' the word ``dog'' may be used instead of ``cur.''
ANAH, or `ANA, a town on the Euphrates, about mid-way
between the Gulf of Alexandretta and the Persian Gulf. It
is called Hanat in a Babylonian letter (about 2200 B.C.),
and An-at by the scribe of Assur-nasir-pal (879 B.C.),
'Anatho (Isidore Charax), Anatha (Ammianus Marcellinus) by
Greek and Latin writers in the early Christian centuries,
`ANA (sometimes, as if plural, `Anat) by Arabic
writers. The name has been connected with that of the deity
Anat. Whilst `Ana has thus retained its name for forty-one
centuries the site is variously described. Most early writers
concur in placing it on an island; so Assurnasir-pal, Isidore,
Ammianus Marcellinus, Ibn Serapion, al- Istakri, Abulfeda and
al-Karamani. Ammianus (lib. 24, c. 2) calls it a
munimentum, Theophylactus Simocatta (iv. 10, v. 1, 2) to
'Anathon frourion, Zosimus (iii. 14) a frourion, opp.
Fathusai, which may be the Beth(th)ina of Ptolemy (v. 19).1
Leonhart Rauwolff, in A.D. 1574, found it ``divided . .
. into two towns,'' the one ``Turkish,'' ``so surrounded by
the river, that you cannot go into it but by boats,'' the
other, much larger, on the Arabian side of the river.2 G.
A. Olivier in the beginning of the 19th century describes
it as a long street (5 or 6 m. long), parallel to the right
bank of the Euphrates--some 100 yards from the water's edge
and 300 to 400 paces from the rocky barrier of the Arabian
desert--with, over against its lower part, an island
bearing at its north end the ruins of a fortress (p. 451).
This southernmost town of Mesopotamia proper (Gezira)
must have shared the chequered history of that land (see
MESOPOTAMIA.) Of `Ana's fortunes under the early Babylonian
empire the records have not yet been unearthed; but in a letter
dating from the third millennium B.C., six men of Hanat
(Ha-na-atK1) are mentioned in a statement as to certain
disturbances which had occurred in the sphere of the Babylonian
Resident of Suhi, which would include the district of `Ana.
How `Ana fared at the hands of the Mitanni and others is
unknown. The suggestion that Amenophis (Amenhotep) I.
(16th century B.C.) refers to it is improbable; but we
seem to be justified in holding `Ana to be the town ``in
the middle of the Euphrates'' opposite (ina put) to which
Assur-nasir-pal halted in his campaign of 879 B.C. The
supposed reference to `Ana in the speech put into the mouth
of Sennacherib's messengers to Hezekiah (2 Kings xix. 13,
Is. xxxvii. 13) is exceedingly improbable. The town may be
mentioned, however, in four 7th century documents edited by C.
H. W. Johns.3 It was at'Ana that the emperor Julian met the
first opposition on his disastrous expedition against Persia
(363), when he got possession of the place and transported
the people; and there that Ziyad and Shureih with the
advanced guard of `Ali's army were refused passage across
the Euphrates (36/657) to join `Ali in Mesopotamia (Tabari i.
3261). Later `Ana was the place of exile of the caliph
Qaim (al-qaim bi-amr-illah) when Basisiri was in power
(450/1058.) In the 14th century `Ana was the seat of a
Catholicos, primate of the Persians (Marin Sanuto). In
1610 Della Valle found a Scot, George Strachan, resident
at `Ana (to study Arabic) as physician to the amir (i.
671-681). In 1835 the steamer ``Tigris'' of the English
Euphrates expedition went down in a hurricane just above
`Ana, near where Julian's force had suffered from a similar
storm. Della Valle described `Ana as the chief Arab town on the
Euphrates, an importance which it owes to its position on one
of the routes from the west to Bagdad; Texeira said that the
power of its amir extended to Palmyra (early 17th century);
but Olivier found the ruling prince with only twenty-five
men in his service, the town becoming more depopulated every
day from lack of protection from the Arabs of the desert.
Von Oppenheim (1893) reported that Turkish troops having
been recently stationed at the place, it had no longer to pay
blackmail (huwwa) to the Arabs. F. R. Chesney reported some
1800 houses, 2 mosques and 16 water-wheels; W. F. Ainsworth
(1835) reported the Arabs as inhabiting the N.W. part of the
town, the Christians the centre, and the Jews the S.E.;
Della Valle (1610) found some sun-worshippers still there.
Modern `Ana lies from W. to E. on the right bank along
a bend of the river just before it turns S. towards Hit,
and presents an attractive appearance. It extends, chiefly
as a single street, for several miles along a narrow strip
of land between the river and a ridge of rocky hills. The
houses are separated from one another by fruit gardens.
`Ana marks the boundary between the olive (N.) and the date
(S.). Arab poets celebrated its wine (Yuqut, iii. 593
f.), and Mustaufi (8/14th century) tells of the fame of its
palm-groves. In the river, facing the town, is a succession
of equally productive islands. The most easterly contains
the ruins of the old castle, whilst the remains of the
ancient Anatho extend from this island for about 2 m. down
the left bank. Coarse cloth is almost the only manufacture.
BIBLIOGRAPHY.--in addition to the authorities cited above
may be mentioned: G. A. Olivier, Voyage dans l'empire
othoman, &c., iii. 450-459 (1807); Carl Ritter, Erdkunde
von Asien, vii. b., pp. 716- 726 (1844); W. F. Ainsworth,
Euphrates Expedition, i. 401-418 (1888). For a map see
sheet 5 of the atlas accompanying Chesney's work. (H. W. H.)
1 Steph. Byz. (sub Turos) says that Arrian calls Anatha Turos.
2 Texeira (1610) says that ``Anna'' lay on both
banks of the river, and so Della Valle (i. 671).
3 Ass. Deeds and Doc. nos. 23, 168, 228, 385.The
characters used are DIS TU, which may mean Ana-tu.
ANAHEIM, a city of Orange county, California, U.S.A., about 14
m. S.E. of Los Angeles, about 12 m. from the Pacific Ocean,
and about 3 m. from the Santa Ana river. (1900) 1456; (1910)
2628. It is served by the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe, and
the Southern Pacific railways. It lies in a fine fruit region,
in which oranges, lemons, apricots, grapes and walnuts are
raised. The plain on which it is laid out, now fertile and
well-watered, was originally an arid waste. Water for irrigation
is obtained from the Santa Ana river, about 15 m. above the
nearest point along the river to the city. The city itself
has an area of only 1 1/2 sq. m., and in 1908 the population
of the district, including that of the city, was estimated at
5000. The principal manufactures are dried and canned fruits,
wine, beer, and agricultural implements. Anaheim is of
particular interest as the earliest of various settlements in
southern California in which co-operation has made possible
the establishment of intensive fruit culture in semi-desert
regions. In 1857 fifty Germans (mostly mechanics) organized
in San Francisco the Los Angeles Vineyard Association and
bought 1165 acres of land here which could be irrigated from
the Santa Ana river; each member took possession of a 20
acre share only when gradual improvement had made everything
ready for occupancy and the tracts had been distributed by
lot, with bonuses or rebates to equalize them in value to
the drawers. This ended the co-operative feature of the
enterprise, which was never communistic except that its
irrigating canal remained common property. The settlement was
uninterruptedly successful, and was influential as a pioneer
experiment. Anaheim was incorporated as a town in 1870;
this incorporation was revoked in 1872; in 1878 the town was
incorporated again; and in 1888 Anaheim received a city charter.
ANAHUAC, a geographical district of Mexico, limited by the
traditional and vaguely defined boundaries of an ancient Indian
empire or confederation of that name previous to the Spanish
conquest. The word is said to signify ``country by the
waters'' in the old Aztec language; hence the theory that
Anahuac was located on the sea coast. One of the theories
relating to the location of Anahuac describes it as all the
plateau region of Mexico, with an area equal to three-fourths
of the republic, and extending between the eastern and
western coast ranges from Rio Grande to the isthmus of
Tehuantepec. A more exact description, however, limits it
to the great plateau valley in which the city of Mexico is
located, between 18 deg. 40' and 20 deg. 30' N. lat., about 200 m.
long by 75 m. wide, with an average elevation of 7500 ft.,
and a mean temperature of 62 deg. . The accepted meaning of the
name fits this region as well as any on the sea coast, as
the lakes of this valley formerly covered one-tenth of its
area. The existence of the name in southern Utah, United States,
and on the gulf coast of Mexico, has given rise to theories
of other locations and wider bounds for the old Indian empire.
ANALCITE, a commonly occurring mineral of the zeolite
group. It crystallizes in the cubic system, the common form
being the icositetrahedron (211), either alone (fig. 1) or in
combination with the cube (100); sometimes the faces of the
cube predominate in size, and its corners are each replaced by
three small triangular faces representing the icositetrahedron
(fig. 2). Although cubic in form, analcite usually shows
feeble double refraction, and is thus optically anomalous.
This feature of analcite has been much studied, Sir David
Brewster in 1826 being the earliest investigator. Crystals of
analcite are often perfectly colourless and transparent with
a brilliant glassy lustre, but some are opaque and white or
pinkish-white. The hardness of the mineral is 5 to 5 1/2,
and its specific gravity is 2.25. Chemically, analcite
is a hydrated sodium and aluminium silicate, NaAlSi2O6 +
H2O; small amounts of the sodium being sometimes replaced
by calcium or by potassium. The water of crystallization is
readily expelled by heat, with modification of the optical
characters of the crystals. Before the blowpipe the mineral
readily fuses with intumescence to a colourless glass. It
is decomposed by acids with separation of gelatinous silica.
FIG. 1. FIG. 2.
Analcite usually occurs, associated with other zeolitic
minerals, lining amygdaloidal cavities in basic volcanic
rocks such as basalt and melaphyre, and especially in such as
have undergone alteration by weathering; the Tertiary basalts
of the north of Ireland frequently contain cavities lined
with small brilliant crystals of analcite. Larger crystals
of the same kind are found in the basalt of the Cyclopean
Islands (Scogli de' Ciclopi or Faraglioni) N.E. of Catania,
Sicily. Large opaque crystals of the pinkish-white colour
are found in cavities in melaphyre at the Seisser Alpe near
Schlern in southern Tirol. In all such cases the mineral
is clearly of secondary origin, but of late years another
mode of occurrence has been recognized, analcite having been
found as a primary constituent of certain igneous rocks such
as monchiquite and some basalts. The irregular grains, of
which it has the form, had previously been mistaken for glass.
Owing to the fact that analcite often crystallizes in cubes,
it was long known as cubic zeolite or as cuboite. The name
now in use was proposed in 1797 in the form analcime, by R. J.
Hauy, in allusion to the weak (analkis) electrification
of the mineral produced by friction. Euthallite is a compact,
greenish analcite, produced by the alteration of elaeolite at
various localities in the Langesund-fjord in southern Norway.
Eudnophite, from the same region, was originally described as
an orthorhombic mineral dimorphous with analcite, but has since
been found to be identical with it. Cluthalite, from the Clyde
(Clutha) valley, is an altered form of the mineral. (L. J. S.)
ANALOGY (Gr. analogia, proportion), a term signifying,
(1) in general, resemblance which falls short of absolute
similarity or identity. Thus by analogy, the word ``loud,''
originally applied to sounds, is used of garments which obtrude
themselves on the attention; all metaphor is thus a kind of
analogy. (2) Euclid used the term for proportionate equality;
but in mathematics it is now obsolete except in the phrase,
``Napier's Analogies'' in spherical trigonometry (see NAPIER,
JOHN.) (3) In grammar, it signifies similarity in the dominant
characteristics of a language, derivation, orthography and so
on. (4) In logic, it is used of arguments by inference from
resemblances between known particulars to other particulars
which are not observed. Under the name of ``example''
(paradeigma) the process is explained by Aristotle (Prior
Anal. ii. 4) as an inference which differs from induction
(q.v.) in havinga particular, not a general, conclusion;
i.e. if A is demonstrably like B in certain respects, it may
be assumed to be like it in another, though the latter is not
demonstrated. Kant and his followers state the distinction
otherwise, i.e. induction argues from the possession of an
attribute by many members of a class that all members of the
class possess it, while analogy argues that, because A has
some of B's qualities, it must have them all (cf. Sir Wm.
Hamilton, Lectures on Logic, ii. 165-174, for a slight
modification of this view). J. S. Mill very properly rejects
this artificial distinction, which is in practice no distinction
at all; he regards induction and analogy as generically the
same, though differing in the demonstrative validity of
their evidence, i.e. induction proceeds on the basis of
scientific, causal connexion, while analogy, in absence of
proof, temporarily accepts a probable hypothesis. In this
sense, analogy may obviously have a universal conclusion.
This type of inference is of the greatest value in physical
science, which has frequently and quite legitimately used
such conclusions until a negative instance has disproved or
further evidence confirmed them (for a list of typical cases
see T. Fowler's edition of Bacon's Nov. Org. Aph. ii. 27
note). The value of such inferences depends on the nature
of the resemblances on which they are based and on that of
the differences which they disregard. If the resemblances
are small and unimportant and the differences great and
fundamental, the argument is known as ``False Analogy.'' The
subject is dealt with in Francis Bacon's Novum Organum,
especially ii. 27 (see T. H. Fowler's notes) under the head
of Instantiae conformes sive proportionatae. Strictly
the argument by analogy is based on similarity of relations
between things, not on the similarity of things, though it
is, in general, extended to cover the latter. See works on
Logic, e.g. J. S. Mill, T. H. Fowler, W. S. Jevons. For
Butler's Analogy and its method see BUTLER, JOSEPH.
The term was used in a special sense by Kant in his phrase,
``Analogies of Experience,'' the third and most important group
in his classification of the a priori elements of knowledge.
By it he understood the fundamental laws of pure natural science
under the three heads, substantiality, causality, reciprocity
(see F. Paulsen, I. Kant, Eng. trans. 1902, pp. 188 ff.).
ANALYSIS (Gr. ana and luein, to break up into parts), in
general, the resolution of a whole into its component elements;
opposed to synthesis, the combining of separate elements or
minor wholes into an inclusive unity. It differs from mere
``disintegration', in proceeding on a definite scientific
plan. In grammar, analysis is the breaking up of a sentence
into subject, predicate, object, &c. (an exercise introduced
into English schools by J. D. Morell about 1852); so the
analysis of a book or a lecture is a synopsis of the main
points. The chief technical uses of the word, which
retains practically the same meaning in all the sciences,
are in (1) philosophy, (2) mathematics, (3) chemistry.
(1) Logical analysis is the process of examining into the
connotation of a concept or idea, and separating the attributes
from the whole and each other. It, therefore, does not increase
knowledge, but merely clarifies and tests it. In this sense
Kant distinguished an analytic from a synthetic judgment, as
one in which the predicate is involved in the essence of the
subject. Such judgments are also known as verbal, as
opposed to real or ampliative judgments. The processes of
synthesis and analysis though formally contradictory are
practically supplementary; thus to analyse the connotation is
to synthesize the denotation of a term, and vice versa; the
process of knowledge involves the two methods, analysis being
the corrective of synthetic empiricism. In a wider sense the
whole of formal logic is precisely the analysis of the laws of
thought. Analytical psychology is distinguished from genetic
and empirical psychology inasmuch as it proceeds by the method
of introspective investigation of mental phenomena instead
of by physiological or psycho-physical experiment. For the
relation between analysis and synthesis on the one hand,
and deduction and induction on the other, see INDUCTION.
(2) In mathematics, analysis has two distinct meanings, conveniently
termed ancient and modern. Ancient analysis, as described by
Pappus, related chiefly to geometrical problems, and is the
method of reasoning from the solution, as taken for granted,
to consequences which are known to be true, whereas synthesis
reasons from known data to the solution. (See GEOMETRY.)
Modern analysis is practically coeval with Descartes, the
founder of ``analytical geometry,'' although the calculus of
general quantities had previously been termed analysis. Many
mathematical subjects are now included under this name, and
are treated in the following articles:--GEOMETRY, ANALYTICAL;
INFINITESIMAL CALCULUS; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION; VARIATIONS,
CALCULUS OF; CURVE; SURFACE; FUNCTION; SPHERICAL HARMONICS;
SERIES; FOURIER'S SERIES; GROUPS, THEORY OF; PROBABILITY.
(3) In Chemistry, the word analysis was introduced
by Robert Boyle to denote the determination of the
composition of substances. (See CHEMISTRY, Analytical.)
ANALYST, in modern times, a person professionally skilled in
chemical analysis. He may be called upon, in the discharge of his
profession, to analyse a wide range of substances. Apart from
private practitioners and those engaged in large manufacturing
concerns, analysts employed by public bodies are termed public
analysts. In most large manufacturing establishments there
is usually a staff of analysts, whose duty it is primarily
to exercise constant watchfulness over the processes of
manufacture, to test the purity of the substances used, as
well as that of the final products. The services of analysts
are constantly required in judicial enquiries, sometimes
in purely criminal cases, sometimes in civil proceedings,
such as offences against the customs or excise or under the
various British Food and Drugs Acts. In the case of criminal
proceedings, the services of the official analyst attached
to the British Home Office are employed. The inland revenue
department has a laboratory at Somerset House, with a staff of
analysts, who are engaged in analysing for excise and other
purposes. Under the Fertilizers and Feeding Stuffs Act 1893,
the Board of Agriculture employs an agricultural chemist,
whose duty is the analysis of fertilizers and feeding stuffs.
A ``public analyst'' is an analyst appointed by a local authority
for the purposes of the Sale of Food and Drugs Acts. He must be
possessed of competent medical, chemical and microscopical knowledge
to analyse all articles of food and drink (see ADULTERATION).
ANALYTIC (the adjective of ``analysis''' q.v.), according
with, or consisting in, the method of separating a whole
into its parts, the opposite of synthetic. For analytic
chemistry, analytic language, &c., see the articles
under the noun-headings. The title of analutika or
Analytics was given by Aristotle to his treatises on logic.
ANAMALAI HILLS, a range of mountains in southern India,
in the Coimbatore district of Madras, lying between 10 deg. 13'
and 10 deg. 31' N. lat., and between 76 deg. 52' and 77 deg. 23' E.
long., forming a portion of the Western Ghats, after this
range has been broken by the Palghat Pass, south of the
Nilgiris. They really consist of a forest-clad and grassy
tableland, with summits rising about 8000 ft.; the Anaimudi
mountain, which is the highest in southern India, having an
altitude of 8850 ft. Their geological formation is metamorphic
gneiss, veined with felspar and quartz, and interspersed
with reddish porphyrite. The lower slopes yield valuable
teak and other timber; and some land has been taken up
for coffee planting. The only inhabitants are a few wild
tribes who live by hunting and collecting jungle produce.
ANAMORPHOSIS (a Gr. word, derived from ana, back,
and morpe, form: the second o in the Greek is long,
but in English the Pronunciation varies), a deformation or
distortion of appearance; in drawing, the representation of
an object as seen, for instance, altered by reflexion in a
mirror; in botany, e.g. in the case of fungi or lichens, an
abnormal change giving the appearance of a different species.
`ANAN BEN DAVID, a Persian Jew of the 8th century, and founder
within Judaism of the sect of Qaraites (Karaites) which set
itself in opposition to the rabbinic tradition. `Anan was an
unsuccessful candidate for the dignity of Exilarch, and thus
his opposition to the rabbanite Jews was political as well as
theological. His secession occurred at a moment when the time
was ripe for a reaction against rabbinism, and `Anan became the
rallying point for many opponents of tradition. (See QARAITES.)
ANANDA, one of the principal disciples of the Buddha
(q.v..) He has been called the beloved disciple of the
Buddhist story. He was the first cousin of the Buddha, and
was devotedly attached to him. Ananda entered the Order
in the second year of the Buddha's ministry, and became one
of his personal attendants, accompanying him on most of his
wanderings and being the interlocutor in many of the recorded
dialogues. He is the subject of a special panegyric delivered
by the Buddha just before his death (Book of the Great
Decease, v. 38); but it is the panegyric of an unselfish
man, kindly, thoughtful for others and popular; not of the
intellectual man, versed in the theory and practice of the
Buddhist system of self-culture. So in the long list of
the disciples given in the Anguttara (i. xiv.) where each
of them is declared to be the chief in some gift, Ananda is
mentioned five times (which is more often than any other),
but it is as chief in conduct and in service to others and
in power of memory, not in any of the intellectual powers
so highly prized in the community. This explains why he had
not attained to arahatship; and in the earliest account of
the convocation said to have been held by five hundred of
the principal disciples immediately after the Buddha's death,
he was the only one who was not an arahat (Cullavagga,
book xi.). In later accounts this incident is explained
away. Thirty-three verses ascribed to Ananda are preserved
in a collection of lyrics by the principal male and female
members of the order (Thera Gatha, 1017-1050). They
show a gentle and reverent but simple spirit. (T. W. R. D.)
ANANIAS, the Gr. form of Hananiah, or Ananiah, a name
occurring several times in the Old Testament and Apocrypha
(Neh. iii. 23, 1 Ch. xxv. 23, Tob. v. 12. &c.), and three
times in the New Testament. Special mention need be made
only of the bearers of the name in the New Testament. (1) A
member of the first Christian community, who, with his wife
Sapphira, was miraculously punished by Peter with sudden death
for hypocrisy and falsehood (Acts v. 1-10; cf. Josh. vii.
1 ff.). (2) A disciple at Damascus who figures in the story
of the conversion and baptism of Paul (Acts ix. 10-17, xxh.
12-16.) (3) Son of Nedebaios (Jos. Ant. xx. 5. 2), a high
priest who presided during the trial of Paul at Jerusalem and
Caesarea (Acts xxiii. 2, xxiv. 1-5). He officiated as high
priest from about A.D. 47 to 59. Quadratus, governor of
Syria, accused him of being responsible for acts of violence.
He was sent to Rome for trial (A.D. 52), but was acquitted
by the emperor Claudius. Being a friend of the Romans, he
was murdered by the people at the beginning of the Jewish war.
ANANTAPUR, a town and district of India, in the Madras
presidency. The town has a station on the Madras
railway, 62 m. S.E. from Bellary. Pop. (1901) 7938.
The district of Anantapur was constituted in 1882 out of
the unwieldy district of Bellary. It has an area of 5557
sq. m., and in its northern and central portions is a high
plateau, generally undulating, with large granite rocks or
low hill ranges rising here and there above its surface.
In the southern portion of the district the surface is
more hilly, the plateau there rising to 2600 ft. above the
sea. There is a remarkable fortress rock at Gooty, 2171 ft.
above the sea, and a similar but larger rock at Penukonda,
with an elevation equal to that of Bangalore, about 3100
ft. Gooty fortress was a stronghold of the Mahrattas,
but was taken from them by Hyder Ali. In 1789 it was ceded
by Tippoo to the nizam, and in 1800 the nizam ceded the
district of Anantapur with others to the British in payment
for a subsidiary British force. The population in 1901 was
788,254, showing an increase of 8% in the decade. The
principal crops are millet, rice, other food grains, pulse,
oil seeds and cotton. There are several steam factories
for pressing cotton. Two railways traverse the district.
ANAPA, a seaport town of Russia, in the government of Kuban,
on the N. coast of the Black Sea, 45 m. S.E. from the Strait
of Yenikale or Kerch, giving access to the Sea of Azov. It was
originally built in 1781 as a frontier fortress of the Turks
against Russia. Three times captured by the Russians, in 1791,
1807 and 1828, and twice restored by them, in 1792 and 1812,
it was finally left in their hands by the treaty of Adrianople
in 1829. During the Crimean War its fortifications were
destroyed (1855) by the Russians themselves. Pop. (1897) 6676.
ANAPAEST (from Gr. anapaistos, reversed), a metrical
foot consisting of three syllables, the first two short
and the third long and accented; so called as the reverse
of a dactyl, which has the first a long syllable, followed
by two short ones. An anapaestic verse is one which
only contains, or is mostly made up of, anapaestic feet.
ANARCHISM (from the Gr. an-, and arche, contrary
to authority), the name given to a principle or theory of
life and conduct under which society is conceived without
government --harmony in such a society being obtained, not
by submission to law, or by obedience to any authority, but
by free agreements concluded between the various groups,
territorial and professional, freely constituted for the sake
of production and consumption, as also for the satisfaction of
the infinite variety of needs and aspirations of a civilized
being. In a society developed on these lines, the voluntary
associations which already now begin to cover all the fields
of human activity would take a still greater extension
so as to substitute themselves for the state in all its
functions. They would represent an interwoven network,
composed of an infinite variety of groups and federations
of all sizes and degrees, local, regional, national and
international-- temporary or more or less permanent--for
all possible purposes: production, consumption and exchange,
communications, sanitary arrangements, education, mutual
protection, defence of the territory, and so on; and, on
the other side, for the satisfaction of an ever-increasing
number of scientific, artistic, literary and sociable
needs. Moreover, such a society would represent nothing
immutable. On the contrary--as is seen in organic life
at large--harmony would (it is contended) result from an
ever-changing adjustment and readjustment of equilibrium
between the multitudes of forces and influences, and this
adjustment would be the easier to obtain as none of the
forces would enjoy a special protection from the state.
If, it is contended, society were organized on these principles,
man would not be limited in the free exercise of his powers
in productive work by a capitalist monopoly, maintained
by the state; nor would he be limited in the exercise of
his will by a fear of punishment, or by obedience towards
individuals or metaphysical entities, which both lead to
depression of initiative and servility of mind. He would
be guided in his actions by his own understanding, which
necessarily would bear the impression of a free action and
reaction between his own self and the ethical conceptions
of his surroundings. Man would thus be enabled to obtain
the full development of all his faculties, intellectual,
artistic and moral, without being hampered by overwork for
the monopolists, or by the servility and inertia of mind
of the great number. He would thus be able to reach full
individualization, which is not possible either under the
present system of individualism, or under any system of
state- socialism in the so-called Volkstaat (popular state).
The Anarchist writers consider, moreover, that their conception
is not a Utopia, constructed on the a priori method,
after a few desiderata have been taken as postulates. It is
derived, they maintain, from an analysis of tendencies that
are at work already, even though state socialism may find a
temporary favour with the reformers. The progress of modern
technics, which wonderfully simplifies the production of all
the necessaries of life; the growing spirit of independence,
and the rapid spread of free initiative and free understanding
in all branches of activity--including those which formerly
were considered as the proper attribution of church and
state--are steadily reinforcing the no-government tendency.
As to their economical conceptions, the Anarchists, in common
with all Socialists, of whom they constitute the left wing,
maintain that the now prevailing system of private ownership in
land, and our capitalist production for the sake of profits,
represent a monopoly which runs against both the principles
of justice and the dictates of utility. They are the main
obstacle which prevents the successes of modern technics from
being brought into the service of all, so as to produce general
well-being. The Anarchists consider the wage-system and
capitalist production altogether as an obstacle to progress.
But they point out also that the state was, and continues to
be, the chief instrument for permitting the few to monopolize
the land, and the capitalists to appropriate for themselves
a quite disproportionate share of the yearly accumulated
surplus of production. Consequently, while combating the
present monopolization of land, and capitalism altogether,
the Anarchists combat with the same energy the state, as
the main support of that system. Not this or that special
form, but the state altogether, whether it be a monarchy
or even a republic governed by means of the referendum.
The state organization, having always been, both in ancient and
modern history (Macedonian empire, Roman empire, modern European
states grown up on the ruins of the autonomous cities), the
instrument for establishing monopolies in favour of the ruling
minorities, cannot be made to work for the destruction of these
monopolies. The Anarchists consider, therefore, that to hand
over to the state all the main sources of economical life--the
land, the mines, the railways, banking, insurance, and so
on--as also the management of all the main branches of industry,
in addition to all the functions already accumulated in its
hands (education, state-supported religions, defence of the
territory, &c.), would mean to create a new instrument of
tyranny. State capitalism would only increase the powers of
bureaucracy and capitalism. True progress lies in the direction
of decentralization, both territorial and functional, in
the development of the spirit of local and personal initiative,
and of free federation from the simple to the compound, in
lieu of the present hierarchy from the centre to the periphery.
In common with most Socialists, the Anarchists recognize
that, like all evolution in nature, the slow evolution of
society is followed from time to time by periods of accelerated
evolution which are called revolutions; and they think that
the era of revolutions is not yet closed. Periods of rapid
changes will follow the periods of slow evolution, and these
periods must be taken advantage of--not for increasing and
widening the powers of the state, but for reducing them,
through the organization in every township or commune of the
local groups of producers and consumers, as also the regional,
and eventually the international, federations of these groups.
In virtue of the above principles the Anarchists refuse to
be party to the present state organization and to support
it by infusing fresh blood into it. They do not seek to
constitute, and invite the working men not to constitute,
political parties in the parliaments. Accordingly,
since the foundation of the International Working Men's
Association in 1864-1866, they have endeavoured to promote
their ideas directly amongst the labour organizations and
to induce those unions to a direct struggle against capital,
without placing their faith in parliamentary legislation.
The Historical Development of Anarchism.--The conception of
society just sketched, and the tendency which is its dynamic
expression, have always existed in mankind, in opposition to
the governing hierarchic conception and tendency--now the one
and now the other taking the upper hand at different periods of
history. To the former tendency we owe the evolution, by
the masses themselves, of those institutions--the clan,
the village community, the gild, the free medieval city--by
means of which the masses resisted the encroachments of
the conquerors and the power-seeking minorities. The same
tendency asserted itself with great energy in the great
religious movements of medieval times, especially in the early
movements of the reform and its forerunners. At the same
time it evidently found its expression in the writings of
some thinkers, since the times of Lao-tsze, although, owing
to its non-scholastic and popular origin, it obviously found
less sympathy among the scholars than the opposed tendency.
As has been pointed out by Prof. Adler in his Geschichte
der Sozialismus und Kommunismus, Aristippus (b. c. 430
B.C.), one of the founders of the Cyrenaic school, already
taught that the wise must not give up their liberty to the
state, and in reply to a question by Socrates he said that he
did not desire to belong either to the governing or the governed
class. Such an attitude, however, seems to have been dictated
merely by an Epicurean attitude towards the life of the masses.
The best exponent of Anarchist philosophy in ancient Greece
was Zeno (342-267 or 270 B.C.), from Crete, the founder of
the Stoic philosophy, who distinctly opposed his conception
of a free community without government to the state-Utopia of
Plato. He repudiated the omnipotence of the state, its
intervention and regimentation, and proclaimed the sovereignty
of the moral law of the individual--remarking already that,
while the necessary instinct of self-preservation leads man to
egotism, nature has supplied a corrective to it by providing
man with another instinct--that of sociability. When men are
reasonable enough to follow their natural instincts, they will
unite across the frontiers and constitute the Cosmos. They
will have no need of law-courts or police, will have no temples
and no public worship, and use no money--free gifts taking the
place of the exchanges. Unfortunately, the writings of Zeno
have not reached us and are only known through fragmentary
quotations. However, the fact that his very wording is
similar to the wording now in use, shows how deeply is laid
the tendency of human nature of which he was the mouth-piece.
In medieval times we find the same views on the state expressed
by the illustrious bishop of Alba, Marco Girolamo Vida, in his
first dialogue De dignitate reipublicae (Ferd. Cavalli, in
Mem. dell' Istituto Veneto, xiii.; Dr E. Nys, Researches in
the History of Economics.) But it is especially in several
early Christian movements, beginning with the 9th century
in Armenia, and in the preachings of the early Hussites,
particularly Chojecki, and the early Anabaptists, especially
Hans Denk (cf. Keller, Ein Apostel der Wiedertaufer),
that one finds the same ideas forcibly expressed--special
stress being laid of course on their moral aspects.
Rabelais and Fenelon, in their Utopias, have also expressed
similar ideas, and they were also current in the 18th
century amongst the French Encyclopaedists, as may be
concluded from separate expressions occasionally met with
in the writings of Rousseau, from Diderot's Preface to
the Voyage of Bougainville, and so on. However, in all
probability such ideas could not be developed then, owing
to the rigorous censorship of the Roman Catholic Church.
These ideas found their expression later during the great French
Revolution. While the Jacobins did all in their power to
centralize everything in the hands of the government, it appears
now, from recently published documents, that the masses of the
people, in their municipalities and ``sections,'' accomplished
a considerable constructive work. They appropriated for
themselves the election of the judges, the organization
of supplies and equipment for the army, as also for the
large cities, work for the unemployed, the management of
charities, and so on. They even tried to establish a direct
correspondence between the 36,000 communes of France through
the intermediary of a special board, outside the National
Assembly (cf. Sigismund Lacroix, Actes de la commune de Paris.)
It was Godwin, in his Enquiry concerning Political Justice
(2 vols., 1793), who was the first to formulate the political
and economical conceptions of Anarchism, even though he did
not give that name to the ideas developed in his remarkable
work. Laws, he wrote, are not a product of the wisdom
of our ancestors: they are the product of their passions,
their timidity, their jealousies and their ambition. The
remedy they offer is worse than the evils they pretend to
cure. If and only if all laws and courts were abolished, and
the decisions in the arising contests were left to reasonable
men chosen for that purpose, real justice would gradually be
evolved. As to the state, Godwin frankly claimed its abolition.
A society, he wrote, can perfectly well exist without any
government: only the communities should be small and perfectly
autonomous. Speaking of property, he stated that the rights
of every one ``to every substance capable of contributing to
the benefit of a human being'' must be regulated by justice
alone: the substance must go ``to him who most wants it.''
His conclusion was Communism. Godwin, however, had not the
courage to maintain his opinions. He entirely rewrote later
on his chapter on property and mitigated his Communist views
in the second edition of Political Justice (8vo, 1796).
Proudhon was the first to use, in 1840 (Qu'est-ce que
la propriete? first memoir), the name of Anarchy with
application to the no-government state of society. The name
of ``Anarchists'' had been freely applied during the French
Revolution by the Girondists to those revolutionaries who did
not consider that the task of the Revolution was accomplished
with the overthrow of Louis XVI., and insisted upon a series of
economical measures being taken (the abolition of feudal rights
without redemption, the return to the village communities of
the communal lands enclosed since 1669, the limitation of landed
property to 120 acres, progressive income-tax, the national
organization of exchanges on a just value basis, which already
received a beginning of practical realization, and so on).
Now Proudhon advocated a society without government, and used
the word Anarchy to describe it. Proudhon repudiated, as is
known, all schemes of Communism, according to which mankind
would be driven into communistic monasteries or barracks, as
also all the schemes of state or state-aided Socialism which
were advocated by Louis Blanc and the Collectivists. When
he proclaimed in his first memoir on property that ``Property
is theft,'' he meant only property in its present, Roman-law,
sense of ``right of use and abuse''; in property-rights, on the
other hand, understood in the limited sense of possession,
he saw the best protection against the encroachments of the
state. At the same time he did not want violently to dispossess
the present owners of land, dwelling-houses, mines, factories
and so on. He preferred to attain the same end by rendering
capital incapable of earning interest; and this he proposed
to obtain by means of a national bank, based on the mutual
confidence of all those who are engaged in production, who
would agree to exchange among themselves their produces at
cost-value, by means of labour cheques representing the hours
of labour required to produce every given commodity. Under
such a system, which Proudhon described as ``Mutuellisme,''
all the exchanges of services would be strictly equivalent.
Besides, such a bank would be enabled to lend money without
interest, levying only something like 1%, or even less, for
covering the cost of administration. Every one being thus
enabled to borrow the money that would be required to buy a
house, nobody would agree to pay any more a yearly rent
for the use of it. A general ``social liquidation'' would
thus be rendered easy, without violent expropriation.
The same applied to mines, railways, factories and so on.
In a society of this type the state would be useless. The chief
relations between citizens would be based on free agreement and
regulated by mere account keeping. The contests might be settled
by arbitration. A penetrating criticism of the state and all
possible forms of government, and a deep insight into all economic
problems, were well-known characteristics of Proudhon's work.
It is worth noticing that French mutualism had its precursor
in England, in William Thompson, who began by mutualism
before he became a Communist, and in his followers John
Gray (A Lecture on Human Happiness, 1825; The Social
System, 1831) and J. F. Bray (Labour's Wrongs and
Labour's Remedy, 1839). It had also its precursor in
America. Josiah Warren, who was born in 1708 (cf. W. Bailie,
Josiah Warren, the First American Anarchist, Boston,
1900), and belonged to Owen's ``New Harmony,'' considered
that the failure of this enterprise was chiefly due to the
suppression of individuality and the lack of initiative and
responsibility. These defects, he taught, were inherent
to every scheme based upon authority and the community of
goods. He advocated, therefore, complete individual liberty.
In 1827 he opened in Cincinnati a little country store which
was the first ``Equity Store,'' and which the people called
``Time Store,'' because it was based on labour being exchanged
hour for hour in all sorts of produce. ``Cost--the limit of
price,'' and consequently ``no interest,'' was the motto of his
store, and later on of his ``Equity Village,'' near New York,
which was still in existence in 1865. Mr Keith's ``House of
Equity'' at Boston, founded in 1855, is also worthy of notice.
While the economical, and especially the mutual-banking,
ideas of Proudhon found supporters and even a practical
application in the United States, his political conception of
Anarchy found but little echo in France, where the Christian
Socialism of Lamennais and the Fourierists, and the State
Socialism of Louis Blanc and the followers of Saint-Simon, were
dominating. These ideas found, however, some temporary
support among the left-wing Hegelians in Germany, Moses Hess
in 1843, and Karl Grun in 1845, who advocated Anarchism.
Besides, the authoritarian Communism of Wilhelm Weitling
having given origin to opposition amongst the Swiss working
men, Wilhelm Marr gave expression to it in the 'forties.
On the other side, Individualist Anarchism found, also in Germany,
its fullest expression in Max Stirner (Kaspar Schmidt), whose
remarkable works (Der Einzige und sein Eigenthum and articles
contributed to the Rheinische Zeitung) remained quite overlooked
until they were brought into prominence by John Henry Mackay.
Prof. V. Basch, in a very able introduction to his interesting
book, L'Individualisme anarchiste: Max Stirner (1904), has
shown how the development of the German philosophy from Kant to
Hegel, and ``the absolute'' of Schelling and the Geist of
Hegel, necessarily provoked, when the anti-Hegelian revolt
began, the preaching of the same ``absolute'' in the camp
of the rebels. This was done by Stirner, who advocated,
not only a complete revolt against the state and against the
servitude which authoritarian Communism would impose upon
men, but also the full liberation of the individual from all
social and moral bonds--the rehabilitation of the ``I,'' the
supremacy of the individual, complete ``a-moralism,'' and the
``association of the egotists.'' The final conclusion of that
sort of Individual Anarchism has been indicated by Prof.
Basch. It maintains that the aim of all superior civilization
is, not to permit all members of the community to develop in
a normal way, but to permit certain better endowed individuals
``fully to develop,'' even at the cost of the happiness and
the very existence of the mass of mankind. It is thus a
return towards the most common individualism, advocated by
all the would-be superior minorities, to which indeed man
owes in his history precisely the state and the rest, which
these individualists combat. Their individualism goes so far
as to end in a negation of their own starting-point,--to say
nothing of the impossibility for the individual to attain a
really full development in the conditions of oppression of
the masses by the ``beautiful aristocracies.'' His development
would remain uni-lateral. This is why this direction of
thought, notwithstanding its undoubtedly correct and useful
advocacy of the full development of each individuality, finds
a hearing only in limited artistic and literary circles.
Anarchism in the International Working Men's Association.--A
general depression in the propaganda of all fractions of
Socialism followed, as is known, after the defeat of the uprising
of the Paris working men in June 1848 and the fall of the
Republic. All the Socialist press was gagged during the reaction
period, which lasted fully twenty years. Nevertheless, even
Anarchist thought began to make some progress, namely in
the writings of Bellegarrique (Coeurderoy), and especially
Joseph Dejacque (Les Lazareennes, L'Humanisphere,
an Anarchist-Communist Utopia, lately discovered and
reprinted). The Socialist movement revived only after 1864,
when some French working men, all ``mutualists,'' meeting in
London during the Universal Exhibition with English followers
of Robert Owen, founded the International Working Men's
Association. This association developed very rapidly and
adopted a policy of direct economical struggle against
capitalism, without interfering in the political parliamentary
agitation, and this policy was followed until 1871. However,
after the Franco-German War, when the International Association
was prohibited in France after the uprising of the Commune,
the German working men, who had received manhood suffrage for
elections to the newly constituted imperial parliament, insisted
upon modifying the tactics of the International, and began to
build up a Social-Democratic political party. This soon led
to a division in the Working Men's Association, and the Latin
federations, Spanish, Italian, Belgian and Jurassic (France
could not be represented), constituted among themselves a
Federal union which broke entirely with the Marxist general
council of the International. Within these federations
developed now what may be described as modern Anarchism.
After the names of ``Federalists'' and ``Anti-authoritarians''
had been used for some time by these federations the name
of ``Anarchists,'' which their adversaries insisted upon
applying to them, prevailed, and finally it was revindicated.
Bakunin (q.v.) soon became the leading spirit among these
Latin federations for the development of the principles of
Anarchism, which he did in a number of writings, pamphlets and
letters. He demanded the complete abolition of the state,
which--he wrote--is a product of religion, belongs to a lower
state of civilization, represents the negation of liberty, and
spoils even that which it undertakes to do for the sake of general
well-being. The state was an historically necessary evil,
but its complete extinction will be, sooner or later, equally
necessary. Repudiating all legislation, even when issuing
from universal suffrage, Bakunin claimed for each nation,
each region and each commune, full autonomy, so long as it
is not a menace to its neighbours, and full independence
for the individual, adding that one becomes really free
only when, and in proportion as, all others are free. Free
federations of the communes would constitute free nations.
As to his economical conceptions, Bakunin described himself,
in common with his Federalist comrades of the International
(Cesar De Paepe, James Guillaume Schwitzguebel), a
``Collectivist Anarchist''--not in the sense of Vidal and
Pecqueur in the 'forties, or of their modern Social-Democratic
followers, but to express a state of things in which all
necessaries for production are owned in common by the Labour
groups and the free communes, while the ways of retribution
of labour, Communist or otherwise, would be settled by each
group for itself. Social revolution, the near approach of
which was foretold at that time by all Socialists, would
be the means of bringing into life the new conditions.
The Jurassic, the Spanish, and the Italian federations and
sections of the International Working Men's Association, as
also the French, the German and the American Anarchist groups,
were for the next years the chief centres of Anarchist thought
and propaganda. They refrained from any participation in
parliamentary politics, and always kept in close contact with
the Labour organizations. However, in the second half of the
'eighties and the early 'nineties of the 19th century, when
the influence of the Anarchists began to be felt in strikes,
in the 1st of May demonstrations, where they promoted the
idea of a general strike for an eight hours' day, and in the
anti-militarist propaganda in the army, violent prosecutions
were directed against them, especially in the Latin countries
(including physical torture in the Barcelona Castle) and the
United States (the execution of five Chicago Anarchists in
1887). Against these prosecutions the Anarchists retaliated
by acts of violence which in their turn were followed by
more executions from above, and new acts of revenge from
below. This created in the general public the impression
that violence is the substance of Anarchism, a view repudiated
by its supporters, who hold that in reality violence is
resorted to by all parties in proportion as their open
action is obstructed by repression, and exceptional laws
render them outlaws. (Cf. Anarchism and Outrage, by C. M.
Wilson, and Report of the Spanish Atrocities Committee,
in ``Freedom Pamphlets''; A Concise History of the Great
Trial of the Chicago Anarchists, by Dyer Lum (New
York, 1886); The Chicago Martyrs: Speeches, &c.).1
Anarchism continued to develop, partly in the direction
of Proudhonian ``Mutuellisme,'' but chiefly as Communist-
Anarchism, to which a third direction, Christian-Anarchism, was
added by Leo Tolstoy, and a fourth, which might be ascribed as
literary-Anarchism, began amongst some prominent modern writers.
The ideas of Proudhon, especially as regards mutual
banking, corresponding with those of Josiah Warren, found
a considerable following in the United States, creating
quite a school, of which the main writers are Stephen Pearl
Andrews, William Grene, Lysander Spooner (who began to
write in 1850, and whose unfinished work, Natural Law,
was full of promise), and several others, whose names will
be found in Dr Nettlan's Bibliographie de l'anarchie.
A prominent position among the Individualist Anarchists
in America has been occupied by Benjamin R. Tucker, whose
journal Liberty was started in 1881 and whose conceptions
are a combination of those of Proudhon with those of Herbert
Spencer. Starting from the statement that Anarchists are
egotists, strictly speaking, and that every group of
individuals, be it a secret league of a few persons, or the
Congress of the United States, has the right to oppress all
mankind, provided it has the power to do so, that equal liberty
for all and absolute equality ought to be the law, and ``mind
every one your own business'' is the unique moral law of
Anarchism, Tucker goes on to prove that a general and thorough
application of these principles would be beneficial and would
offer no danger, because the powers of every individual would
be limited by the exercise of the equal rights of all others.
He further indicated (following H. Spencer) the difference
which exists between the encroachment on somebody's rights
and resistance to such an encroachment; between domination
and defence: the former being equally condemnable, whether
it be encroachment of a criminal upon an individual, or the
encroachment of one upon all others, or of all others upon one;
while resistance to encroachment is defensible and necessary.
For their self-defence, both the citizen and the group have
the right to any violence, including capital punishment.
Violence is also justified for enforcing the duty of keeping an
agreement. Tucker thus follows Spencer, and, like him, opens
(in the present writer's opinion) the way for reconstituting
under the heading of ``defence'' all the functions of the
state. His criticism of the present state is very searching,
and his defence of the rights of the individual very powerful.
As regards his economical views B. R. Tucker follows Proudhon.
The Individualist Anarchism of the American Proudhonians finds,
however, but little sympathy amongst the working masses.
Those who profess it--they are chiefly ``intellectuals''--soon
realize that the individualization they so highly praise
is not attainable by individual efforts, and either abandon
the ranks of the Anarchists, and are driven into the Liberal
individualism of the classical economists, or they retire
into a sort of Epicurean a-moralism, or super-man-theory,
similar to that of Stirner and Nietzsche. The great bulk of
the Anarchist working men prefer the Anarchist-Communist ideas
which have gradually evolved out of the Anarchist Collectivism
of the International Working Men's Association. To this
direction belong--to name only the better known exponents of
Anarchism--Elisee Reclus, Jean Grave, Sebastien Faure, Emile
Pouget in France; Enrico Malatesta and Covelli in Italy; R.
Mella, A. Lorenzo, and the mostly unknown authors of many
excellent manifestos in Spain; John Most amongst the Germans;
Spies, Parsons and their followers in the United States,
and so on; while Domela Nieuwenhuis occupies an intermediate
position in Holland. The chief Anarchist papers which have
been published since 1880 also belong to that direction;
while a number of Anarchists of this direction have joined
the so-called Syndicalist movement--the French name for the
non-political Labour movement, devoted to direct struggle with
capitalism, which has lately become so prominent in Europe.
As one of the Anarchist-Communist direction, the present
writer for many years endeavoured to develop the following
ideas: to show the intimate, logical connexion which exists
between the modern philosophy of natural sciences and
anarchism; to put Anarchism on a scientific basis by the
study of the tendencies that are apparent now in society and
may indicate its further evolution; and to work out the basis
of Anarchist ethics. As regards the substance of Anarchism
itself, it was Kropotkin's aim to prove that Communism--at
least partial--has more chances of being established than
Collectivism, especially in communes taking the lead, and that
Free, or Anarchist- Communism is the only form of Communism
that has any chance of being accepted in civilized societies;
Communism and Anarchy are therefore two terms of evolution which
complete each other, the one rendering the other possible and
acceptable. He has tried, moreover, to indicate how, during
a revolutionary period, a large city--if its inhabitants
have accepted the idea--could organize itself on the lines
of Free Communism; the city guaranteeing to every inhabitant
dwelling, food and clothing to an extent corresponding to
the comfort now available to the middle classes only, in
exchange for a half-day's, or a five-hours' work; and how
all those things which would be considered as luxuries might
be obtained by every one if he joins for the other half of
the day all sorts of free associations pursuing all possible
aims--educational, literary, scientific, artistic, sports and so
on. In order to prove the first of these assertions he has
analysed the possibilities of agriculture and industrial
work, both being combined with brain work. And in order
to elucidate the main factors of human evolution, he has
analysed the part played in history by the popular constructive
agencies of mutual aid and the historical role of the state.
Without naming himself an Anarchist, Leo Tolstoy, like his
predecessors in the popular religious movements of the 15th
and 16th centuries, Chojecki, Denk and many others, took
the Anarchist position as regards the state and property
rights, deducing his conclusions from the general spirit of
the teachings of the Christ and from the necessary dictates of
reason. With all the might of his talent he made (especially
in The Kingdom of God in Yourselves) a powerful criticism
of the church, the state and law altogether, and especially
of the present property laws. He describes the state as the
domination of the wicked ones, supported by brutal force.
Robbers, he says, are far less dangerous than a well-organized
government. He makes a searching criticism of the prejudices
which are current now concerning the benefits conferred upon
men by the church, the state and the existing distribution of
property, and from the teachings of the Christ he deduces the
rule of non-resistance and the absolute condemnation of all
wars. His religious arguments are, however, so well combined
with arguments borrowed from a dispassionate observation of
the present evils, that the anarchist portions of his works
appeal to the religious and the non-religious reader alike.
It would be impossible to represent here, in a short sketch,
the penetration, on the one hand, of Anarchist ideas into
modern literature, and the influence, on the other hand, which
the libertarian ideas of the best comtemporary writers have
exercised upon the development of Anarchism. One ought to
consult the ten big volumes of the Supplement litteraire
to the paper La revolte and later the Temps nouveaux,
which contain reproductions from the works of hundreds of
modern authors expressing Anarchist ideas, in order to realize
how closely Anarchism is connected with all the intellectual
movement of our own times. J. S. Mill's Liberty, Spencer's
Individual versus The State, Marc Guyau's Morality
without Obligation or Sanction, and Fouillee's La morale,
l'art et la religion, the works of Multatuli (E. Douwes
Dekker), Richard Wagner's Art and Revolution, the works of
Nietzsche, Emerson, W. Lloyd Garrison, Thoreau, Alexander
Herzen, Edward Carpenter and so on; and in the domain of
fiction, the dramas of Ibsen, the poetry of Walt Whitman,
Tolstoy's War and Peace, Zola's Paris and Le travail,
the latest works of Merezhkovsky, and an infinity of works of
less known authors,--are full of ideas which show how closely
Anarchism is interwoven with the work that is going on in modern
thought in the same direction of enfranchisement of man from
the bonds of the state as well as from those of capitalism.
BIBLIOGRAPHY.--William Godwin, An Enquiry concerning
Political Justice and its Influence on General Virtue and
Happiness, 1st edition, 2 vols. (1793). Mutualism:--John
Gray, A Lecture on Human Happiness (1825); The Social
System, a Treatise on the Principles of Exchange (1831);
Proudhon, Qu'est-ce que la propriete 11er memoire
(1840) (Eng. trans. by B. Tucker); Idee generale sur
la revolution (1851);. Confession d'un revolutionnaire
(1849); Contradictions economiques (1846); Josiah
Warren, Practicable Details of Equitable Commerce (New
York, 1852); True Civilizaltion (Boston, 1863); Stephen
Pearl Andrews, The Science of Society (1851); Cost, the
Limit of Price; Moses Hess, ``Sozialismus und Communismus,
Philosophie der That'' (on Herwegh's Ein-und-Zwanzip Bogen
aus der Schweiz, 1843); Karl Grun, Die soziale Bewegung
in Frankreich und Belgien (1845); W. Marr, Das junge
Deutschland (1845). Anarchist Individualism:--Max Stirner
(J. K. Schmidt), Der Einzige und sein Eigenthum (1845) (Fr.
trans., 1900); J. H. Mackay, Max Stirner, sein Leben und
sein Werk (1898): V. Basch, L'Individualisme anarchists
(1904). Transition period:--J. Dejacque, Les Lazareennes
rj85I); Le Libertaire, weekly, New York, 1858--1861,
containing Anarchist Collectivism of the International:--The
papers Egalite, Progres (Locle), Solidaritet; James
Guillaume, Idees sur l'organisation seciale (1876);
Bulletin de la .federation jurassienne (1872-1879); A.
Schwitzguebel, OEuvres; Paul Brousse, Le Suffrage
universel (1874); L'Etat a Versailles et dans l'association
internationale (1874); newspaper L'Avant-garde (suppressed
1878); Arthur Arnould, L'Etat et la revolution (1877);
Histoire populaire de la commune (3 vols., 1878); Cesar de
Paepe, in Rive gauche and La liberte (1867-1883). Many
others are in the Comptes rendus of the congresses of the
International Working Men's Association. All these ideas,
conceived as a whole, may be found in Bakunin's Federalisme,
socialisme et anti-theologisme, published first in portions
under the names of L'Empire knouto-germanique, Dieu et
l'etat, The State-Idea and Anarchy (Russian), and only
now reproduced in full in his OEuvres (Paris, 1905 and
seq.); Sozialpolitischer Briefwechsel (1894); Statuts de
l'alliance internationale (1868); Proposition motivee au
comite central de la ligue de la paix et de la llberte
(1868.) The famous Revolutionary Catechism attributed to
Bakunin, was not his work. Biographie von Michael Bakunin,
by Dr M. Nettlan, 3 large vols., contains masses of letters,
&c. (hectographed in 50 copies; in all chief libraries).
MODERN ANARCHISM.--The best sources are the collections of
newspapers which, although compelled sometimes to change their
names, were run for considerable lengths of time and are appearing
still: J. Most, Freiheit, since 1878; Le Revolte--La
Revolte--Temps nouveaux, since 1878; Domela Nieuwenhuis,
Recht voor Allen, since 1878; Freedom, since 1886; Le
Libertaire; Pouget's Pere Pesuard; Reveil-Risveglio;
see Nettlan's Bibliographie. These papers and a great
number of pamphlets are indispensable for those who intend to
know anarchism, as the works published in book form are not
numerous. Of the latter only a few will be mentioned:--Elisee
Reclus, Evolution and Revolution, many editions in all
languages; ``Anarchy by an Anarchist,'' in Contemp. Review
(May, 1884); The Ideal and Youth (1895); Jean Grave, La
Societe au lendemain de la revolution, many editions
since 1882; La Societe mourante et l'anarchie (1893);
L'Autonomie selon la science (1882); La Societe future
(1895); L'Anarchie, son but, ses moyens; Sebastien Faure,
La Douleur universelle (1892); A. Hamon, Les Hemmes
et les theories de l'anarchie (1893); Psychologie de
l'anarchiste-socialiste (1895); Enrico Malatesta, Fra
Contadini, transl. in all languages--Eng. trans. A Talk
about Anarchist Communism, in ``Freedom Pamphlets'' (1891);
Anarchy (do. 1892); Au cafe; and many other Italian
pamphlets, as also several papers started at various times
in Italy under different names: F. S. Merlino, Socialismo
o Menopolismo (1887). Pamphlets, reviews and papers by
P. Gori, L. Molinari, E. Covelli, &c. The manifestos of the
Spanish Federations contain excellent expositions of Anarchism;
cf. also many books, pamphlets and papers by J. Llunas y
Pujals, J. Serrano y Oteiza, Ricardo Mella, A. Lorenzo, &c.
John Most, the paper Freiheit, of which a few articles
only have been reprinted as pamphlets in the Internationale
Bibliothek (``The Deistic Pestilence,'' ``The Beast of
Property'' in English); Memoiren, 3 fascicules. F. Domela
Nieuwenhuis, Le Socialisme en danger (1895); C. Malato,
Philosophie de l'anarchie (1890); Charlotte Wilson, Anarchism
(``Fabian Tracts,'' 4); Anarchism and Violence (``Freedom
Pamphlets''); Albert Parsons, Anarchism, its Philosophy and
Scientific Basis (Chicago, 1888); The Chicago Martyrs:
Speeches in Court; P. Kropotkin, Paroles d'un revolte
(1884); Conquest of Bread (1906) (1st French ed. in 1890);
Anarchist Morality; Anarchy, its Philosophy and Ideals;
Anarchist Communism; The State, its Historic Role; and other
``Freedom Pamphlets''; Fields, Factories and Workshops (5th
popular edition, 1807); Mutual Aid: a Factor of Evolution
(1904). Modern Individualist Anarchists:--B. Tucker, the
paper Liberty (1892 sqq.); Instead of a Book, by one too
busy to write one (Boston, 1893); Dyer Lum, Social Problems
(1883); Lysander Spooner, Natural Law, or the Science of
Justice (Boston, 1891). Religious Anarchists:--Leo Tolstoy,
The Kingdom of God in Yourselves; My Faith; Confession; &c.
The best work on Anarchism, and in fact the only one
written with full knowledge of the Anarchist literature,
and quite fairly, is by a German judge Dr Paul Eltzbacher,
Anarchismus (transl. in all chief European languages,
except English). Prof. Adler's article ``Anarchismus'' in
Conrad's Handworterbuch der Staatswissenschaften, vol.
i., is less accurate for modern times than for the earlier
periods. G. v. Zenker, Der Anarchismus (1895); and
Prof. Edmund Bernatzik, ``Der Anarchismus,'' in Schmoller's
Jahrbuch, may also be mentioned--the remainder being
written with absolute want of knowledge of the subject.
A most important work is the reasoned Bibliographie de l'anarchie,
by Dr M. Nettlan (Brussels, 1897, 8vo, 294 ff.), written with a
full knowledge of the subject and its immense literature. (P. A. K.)
1 It is imoortant to remember that the term ``Anarchist', is
inevitably rather loosely used in public, in connexion with
the authors of a certain class of murderous outrages, and
that the same looseness of definition often applies to the
professions of ``Anarchism'' made by such persons. As stated
above, a philosophic Anarchist would repudiate the connexion.
And the general public view which regards Anarchist doctrines
indiscriminately is to that extent a confusion of terms. But the
following resume of the chief modern so-called ``Anarchist''
incidents is appended for convenience in stating the facts
under the heading where a reader would expect to find them.
Between 1852 and 1886, in France, Prince Kropotkin, Louise
Michel and others were imprisoned. In England, Most, one of
the German Anarchist leaders, founded Die Freiheit, and,
for defending in it the assassination of Alexander II. at St
Petersburg, was sentenced to eighteen months' imprisonment
with hard labour. After this he moved to the United States,
and re-established his paper there in New York, in May
1886. During this period there were several Anarchist
congresses in the United States. In one at Albany, in 1878,
the revolutionary element, led by Justus Schwab, broke away
from the others; at Allegheny City, in 1879, again there
was a rupture between the peaceful and the revolutionary
sections. The Voice of the People at St Louis, the
Arbeiter Zeitung at Chicago, and the Anarchist at Boston,
were the organs of the revolutionary element. In 1883, at
Pittsburg, a congress of twenty-eight delegates, representing
twenty-two towns, drew up an address to the working men of
America. The programme it proposed was as follows:--
First, Destruction of the existing class rule by all means, i.e.
energetic, relentless, revolutionary and international action.
Second, Establishment of a free society, based
upon co-operative organization of production.
Third, Free exchange of equivalent products by and between the
productive organizations, without commerce and profit-mongery.
Fourth, Organization of education on a secular,
scientific and equal basis for both sexes.
Fifth, Equal rights for all, without distinction
of sex or race. the autonomous (independent) communes
and associations, resting on a federalistic basis.
This, together with an appeal to the working men to organize,
was published in Chicago, November 1883, by a local committee
of four, representing French, Bohemian, German and English
sections, the head of the last being August Spies, who was
hanged in 1887 for participation in the Haymarket affair in
Chicago, 4th May 1886. This affair was the culmination of a
series of encounters between the Chicago working men and the
police, which had covered several years. The meeting of 4th
May was called by Spies and others to protest against the
action of the police, by whom several working men had been
killed in collisions growing out of the efforts to introduce
the eight hours' day. The mayor of the city attended the
meeting, but, finding it peaceful, went home. The meeting was
subsequently entered by the police and commanded to disperse.
A bomb was thrown, several policemen being killed and a number
wounded. For this crime eight men were tried in one panel and
condemned, seven--Spies, Parsons, Engel, Fischer, Fielden,
Schwab, and Ling--to death, and one--Neebe--to imprisonment
for fifteen years. The sentences on Fielden and Schwab were
commuted by Governor Oglesby to imprisonment for life, on
the recommendation of the presiding judge and the prosecuting
attorney. Ling committed suicide in jail, and Spies, Parsons,
Engel and Fischer were hanged, 11th November 1887. On 26th
June 1893 an unconditional pardon was granted the survivors,
Fielden, Schwab and Neebe, by Governor Altgeld. The reasons
for the pardon were stated by the governor to be that, upon
an examination of the records he found that the jury had not
been drawn in the usual manner, but by a special bailiff, who
made his own selection and had summoned a ``prejudiced jury'';
that the ``state had never discovered who it was that threw
ihe bomb which killed the policemen, and the evidence does
not show any connexion whatever between the defendants and the
man who did throw it,'' . . . or that this man ``ever heard
or read a word coming from the defendants, and consequently
fails to show that he acted on any advice given by them.''
Judge Gary, the judge at the trial, published a defence of
its procedure in the Century Magazine, vol. xxiii p. 803.
A number of outbreaks in later years were attributed to the
propaganda of reform by revolution, like those in Spain and
France in 1892, in which Ravachol was a prominent figure. In
1893 a bomb was exploded in the French Chamber of Deputies by
Vaillant. The spirit of these men is well illustrated by the
reply which Vaillant made to the judge who reproached him for
endangering the lives of innocent men and women: ``There can
be no innocent bourgeois.'' In 1894 there was an explosion in
a Parisian cafe, and another in a theatre at Barcelona. For
the latter outrage six men were executed. President Carnot
of the French Republic was assassinated by an Italian at
Lyons in the same year. The empress Elizabeth of Austria was
assassinated in September 1898. These events, all associated
by the public with ``Anarchism,'' led to the passage by the
Uniied States Congress of a law, in 1894, to keep out foreign
Anarchists, and to deport any who might be found in the country,
and also to the assemblage of an international conference in
Rome, in 1898, to agree upon some plan for dealing with these
revolutionists. It was proposed that their offences should
no longer be classed as political, but as common-law crimes,
and be made subject to extradition. The suppression of the
revolutionary press and the international co-operation of the
police were also suggested. The results of the conference
were not, however, published; and the question of how to
deal with the campaign against society fell for a while into
abeyance. The attempt made by the youth Sipido on the (then)
prince of Wales at Brussels in 1900 recalled attention to the
subject. The acquittal of Sipido, and the failure of the
Belgian government to see that justice was done in an affair of
such international importance, excited considerable feeling in
England, and was the occasion of a strongly-worded note from
the British to the Belgian government. The murder of King
Humbert of Italy in July 1900 renewed the outcry against Italian
Anarchists. Even greater horror and indignation were excited
by the assassination of President McKinley by Czolgoscz on the
6th of September 1901, at Buffalo, U.S.A. And a particularly
dastardly attempt was made to blow up the young king and
queen of Spain on their wedding-day in 1906. (ED. E.B.)
ANASTASIUS, the name of four popes. ANASTASIUS I.,
pope from 399-401. He it was who condemned the writings
of Origen shortly after their translation into Latin.
ANASTASIUS II., pope from 496-498. He lived in the time of
the schism of Acacius of Constantinople. He showed some tendency
towards conciliation, and thus brought upon himself the lively
reproaches of the author of the Liber pontificalis. On the
strength of this tradition, Dante has placed this pope in hell.
ANASTASIUS III., pope from 911-913, was a Roman by birth.
Practically nothing is recorded of him, his pontificate falling
in the period when Rome was in the power of the Roman nobles.
ANASTASIUS IV. was pope from 1153 to 1154. He was a Roman
named Conrad, son of Benedictus, and at the time of his
election, on the 9th of July 1153, was cardinal bishop of
Sabina. He had taken part in the double election of 1130,
had been one of the most determined opponents of Anacletus II.
and, when Innocent II. fled to France, had been left behind
as his vicar in Italy. During his short pontificate, however,
he played the part of a peacemaker; he came to terms with the
emperor Frederick I. in the vexed question of the appointment
to the see of Magdeburg and closed the long quarrel, which
had raged through four pontificates, about the appointment of
William Fitzherbert (d. 1154)--commonly known as St William
of York--to the see of York, by sending him the pallium, in
spite of the continued opposition of the powerful Cistercian
order. Anastasius died on the 3rd of December 1154, and
was succeeded by Cardinal Nicholas of Albano as Adrian IV.
ANASTASIUS I. (c. 430-518), Roman emperor, was born at
Dyrrhachium not later than A.D. 430. At the time of the death
of Zeno (491), Anastasius, a palace official (silentiarius),
held a very high character, and was raised to the throne
of the Roman empire of the East, through the choice of
Ariadne, Zeno's widow, who married him shortly after his
accession. His reign, though afterwards disturbed by foreign
and intestine wars and religious distractions, commenced
auspiciously. He gained the popular favour by a judicious
remission of taxation, and displayed great vigour and energy
in administering the affairs of the empire. The principal
wars in which Anastasius was engaged were those known as
the Isaurian and the Persian. The former (492-496) was
stirred up by the supporters of Longinus, the brother of
Zeno. The victory of Cotyaeum in 493 ``broke the back'' of
the revolt, but a guerilla warfare continued in the Isaurian
mountains for some years longer. In the war with Persia
(502-505), Theodosiopolis and Amida were captured by the
enemy, but the Persian provinces also suffered severely
and the Romans recovered Amida. Both adversaries were
exhausted when peace was made (506) on the basis of status
quo. Anastasius afterwards built the strong fortress of
Daras to hold Nisibis in check. The Balkan provinces were
devastated by invasions of Slavs and Bulgarians; to protect
Constantinople and its vicinity against them he built the
``Anastasian wall,'' extending from the Propontis to the
Euxine. The emperor was a convinced Monophysite, but his
ecclesiastical policy was moderate; he endeavoured to maintain
the principle of the Henotikon of Zeno and the peace of the
church. It was the uncompromising attitude of the orthodox
extremists, and the rebellious demonstrations of the Byzantine
populace, that drove him in 512 to abandon this policy and
adopt a monophysitic programme. His consequent unpopularity
in the European provinces was utilized by an ambitious
man, named Vitalian, to organize a dangerous rebellion, in
which he was assisted by a horde of ``Huns'' (514-515); it
was finally suppressed by a naval victory won by the general
Marinus. The financial policy of Anastasius was so prudent
and economical that it gained him a reputation for avarice
and contributed to his unpopularity. He died in 518.
AUTHORITIES.--Sources: Joshua the Stylite, Chronicle,
ed. Wright, with English translation, Cambridge, 1882;
Marcellinus, Chronicle; Zachariah of Mytilene, Chronicle
(Eng. trans. by Hamilton and Brooks, London, 1899); Evagrius,
Ecclesiastical History; John Lydus, De Magistratibus; John
Malalas, Chronicle. Modern works: Gibbon, Decline and Fall,
vol. iv. (ed. Bury); Bury, Later Roman Empire, vol. i.
ANASTASIUS II. (d. 721), Roman emperor in the East, whose
original name was Artemius, was raised to the throne of
Constantinople by the voice of the senate and people in A.D.
713, on the deposition of Philippicus, whom he had served in
the capacity of secretary. The empire was threatened by the
Saracens both by land and sea, and Anastasius sent an army
under Leo the Isaurian, afterwards emperor, to defend Syria;
adopted wise and resolute measures for the defence of his
capital; attempted to reorganize the discipline of the army;
and equipped and despatched to Rhodes a formidable naval
force, with orders not only to resist the approach of the
enemy, but to destroy their naval stores. The troops of the
Opsikian province, resenting the emperor's strict measures,
mutinied, slew the admiral, and proclaimed Theodosius, a
person of low extraction, emperor. After a six months' siege,
Constantinople was taken by Theodosius; and Anastasius, who
had fled to Nicaea, was compelled to submit to the new emperor,
and, retiring to Thessalonica, became a monk (716). In 721
he headed a revolt against Leo, who had succeeded Theodosius,
and receiving a considerable amount of support, laid siege
to Constantinople; but the enterprise failed, and Anastasius,
falling into Leo's hands, was put to death by his orders.
AUTHORITIES.--Sources: Theophanes, Chronicle: Nicephorus
Patriarches, Breviarium. Modern works: Gibbon, Decline and
Fall, vol. v. (ed. Bury); Bury, Later Roman Empire, vol. ii.
ANASTOMOSIS (a Greek word in which the second o is long,
from anastomoun, to furnish with a mouth or outlet),
the intercommunication between two vessels; a word used in
vegetable and animal anatomy for the communication between
channels (arteries and veins) containing fluid, and also for
the crossing between the veins or branches of leaves, trees,
insect-wings or river-connexions, and by analogy in art-design.
ANATASE, one of the three mineral forms of titanium dioxide.
It is always found as small, isolated and sharply developed
crystals, and like rutile, a more commonly occurring modification
of titanium dioxide, it crystallizes in the tetragonal system;
but, although the degree of symmetry is the same for both,
there is no relation between the interfacial angles of the two
minerals, except, of course, in the prism-zone of 45 deg. and
90 deg. . The common pyramid {111} (fig. 1) of anatase,1 parallel
to the faces of which there are perfect cleavages, has an angle
over the polar edge of 82 deg. 9', the corresponding angle (111):
(111) of rutile being 56 deg. 52 1/2'. It was on account of this
steeper pyramid of anatase that the mineral was named, by R.
J. Hauy in 1801, from the Gr. anatasis, ``extension,''
the vertical axis of the crystals being longer than in rutile.
There are also important differences between the physical
characters of anatase and rutile; the former is not quite
so hard (H= 5 1/2-6) or dense (sp. gr. = 3.9); it is optically
negative, rutile being positive; and its lustre is even more
strongly adamantine or metallic-adamantine than that of rutile.
Two types or habits of anatase crystals may be distinguished.
The commoner occurs as simple acute double pyramids {111}
(fig. 1) with an indigo-blue to black colour and steely
lustre. Crystals of this kind are abundant at Le Bourg
d'Oisans in Dauphine, where they are associated with
rock-crystal, felspar and axinite in crevices in granite and
mica-schist. Similar crystals, but of microscopic size,
are widely distributed in sedimentary rocks, such as
sandstones, clays and slates, from which they may be separated
by washing away the lighter constituents of the powdered
rock. Crystals of the second type have numerous pyramidal
faces developed, and they are usually flatter or sometimes
prismatic in habit (fig. 2); the colour is honey-yellow to
FIG. 1. FIG. 2.
brown. Such crystals closely resemble xenotine in appearance
and, indeed, were for a long time supposed to belong to
this species, the special name wiserine being applied to
them. They occur attached to the walls of crevices in
the gneisses of the Alps, the Binnenthal near Brieg in
canton Valais, Switzerland, being a well-known locality.
When strongly heated, anatase is converted into rutile, changing
in specific gravity to 4.1; naturally occurring pseudomorphs of
rutile after anatase are also known. Crystals of anatase have
been artificially prepared by several methods; for instance,
by the interaction of steam and titanium chloride or fluoride.
Another name commonly in use for this mineral is octahedrite,
a name which, indeed, is earlier than anatase, and given
because of the common (acute) octahedral habit of the
crystals. Other names, now obsolete, are oisanite and
dauphinite, from the well-known French locality. (L. J. S.)
1 For the notation see CRYSTALLOGRAPHY.
ANATHEMA (from Gr. anatithenai, to lift up), literally
an offering, a thing set aside. The classical Greek form
anathema (Lat. anathema) was the technical term for
a gift (cf. donarium, oblatio) made to a god either in
gratitude or with a view to propitiation. Thus at Athens
the Thesmothetae (perhaps all the archons) made a vow that,
should they break any law, they would dedicate a life-size
gilt statue in the temple at Delphi. Similarly, of spoils
taken in war, a part, generally a tenth, was dedicated to the
god of the city (e.g. to Athena); to this class probably
belong the trophies erected by the victors on the field of
battle; sometimes a captured ship was placed upon a hill as
an offering to Poseidon (Neptune). Persons who had recovered
from an illness offered anathemata in the temples of
Asclepius (Aesculapius); those who had escaped from shipwreck
offered their clothes, or, if these had been lost, a lock of
hair, to Neptune (Hor. Odes, i. 5. 13; Virg. Aeneid, xii.
768). The latter offering was very commonly made by young
men and girls, especially young brides. Works of art of
all kinds and the implements of a craftsman giving up his
work were likewise dedicated. Such presents were far more
common, as also more valuable, among the Greeks than among the
Romans. Similar practices were prevalent, to an extent hardly
realized, among the Christians up to the middle ages and even
later. Just as the ancients hung their offerings on trees,
temple columns and the images of the gods, so offerings were
made to the Cross, to the Virgin Mary and on altars generally.
In the form anathema, the word is used in the Septuagint,
the New Testament and ecclesiastical writers as the equivalent
of the Hebrew herem, which is commonly translated
``accursed thing'' (A.V.) or ``devoted thing'' (R.V.; cf.
the Roman devotio.) In Hebrew the root h-r-m means
to ``set apart,'' ``devote to Yahweh,'' for destruction;
but in Arabic it means simply to separate or seclude (cf.
``harem''). The idea of destruction or perdition is thus
a secondary meaning of the Word, which gradually lost its
primary sense of consecration. In the New Testament, though
it is used in the sense of ``offering'' (Luke xxi. 5), it
generally signifies ``separated'' from the church, i.e.
``accursed'' (cf. Gal. i. 8 ff.; 1 Cor. xvi. 22), and it became
the regular formula of excommunication from the time of the
council of Chalcedon in 451, especially against heretics,
e.g. in the canons of the council of Trent and those of
the Vatican council of 1870. See EXCOMMUNICATION; PENANCE.
The expression maranatha (``the Lord cometh''), which
follows anathema in 1 Cor. xvi. 22, is often erroneously
quoted as though it were an amplification of the curse.
ANATOLI, JACOB (c. 1194-1256), Hebrew translator from the
Arabic. He was invited to Naples by the enlightened ruler Frederick
II., and under this royal patronage and in association with Michael
Scot, made Arabic learning accessible to Western readers. Among
his most important services were translations of works by Averroes.
ANATOLIA (Gr. anatole, sunrise, i.e. eastern land), in
ancient geography, the country east of the Aegean, i.e. Asia
Minor. It was the name of one of the three themes (provinces)
into which Phrygia was divided in the military reorganization
of the East Roman empire. It is now used (by the Turks in
the form (Anadoli) to denote a division of the Turkish
empire, practically coincident with Asia Minor (q.v..)
ANATOMY (Gr. anatome, from ana-temnein, to cut up),
literally dissection or cutting asunder, a term always used
to denote the study of the structure of living things; thus
there is animal anatomy (zootomy) and vegetable anatomy
(phytotomy). Animal anatomy may include the study of the
structure of different animals, when it is called comparative
anatomy or animal morphology, or it may be limited to
one animal only, in which case it is spoken of as special
anatomy. From a utilitarian point of view the study of Man
is the most important division of special anatomy, and this
human anatomy may be approached from different points of
view. From that of the medical man it consists of a knowledge
of the exact form, position, size and relationship of the various
structures of the human body in health, and to this study the
term descriptive or topographical human anatomy is given,
though it is often, less happily, spoken of as Anthropotomy.
An accurate knowledge of all the details of the human body takes
years of patient observation to gain and is possessed by only a
few. So intricate is man's body that only a small number of
professional human anatomists are complete masters of all its
details, and most of them specialize on certain parts, such
as the brain, viscera, &c.; contenting themselves with a
good working knowledge of the rest. Topographical anatomy
must be learned by each person for himself by the repeated
dissection and inspection of the dead human body. It is no
more a science than a pilot's knowledge is, and, like that
knowledge, must be exact and available in moments of emergency.
From the morphological point of view, however, human anatomy
is a scientific and fascinating study, having for its object
the discovery of the causes which have brought about the
existing structure of Man, and needing a knowledge of the allied
sciences of embryology or ontogeny, phylogeny and histology.
Pathological or morbid anatomy is the study of diseased
organs, while sections of normal anatomy, applied to various
purposes, receive special names such as medical, surgical,
gynaecological, artistic and superficial anatomy. The
comparison of the anatomy of different races of mankind is
part of the science of physical anthropology or anthropological
anatomy. In the present edition of this work the subject of
anatomy is treated systematically rather than topographically.
Each anatomical article contains first a description of the
structures of an organ or system (such as nerves, arteries,
heart, &c.), as it is found in Man; and this is followed by
an account of the development or embryology and comparative
anatomy or morphology, as far as vertebrate animals are
concerned; but only those parts of the lower animals which
are of interest in explaining Man's structure are here dealt
with. The articles have a twofold purpose; first, to give
enough details of man's structure to make the articles on
physiology, surgery, medicine and pathology intelligible;
and, secondly, to give the non-expert inquirer, or the
worker in some other branch of science, the chief theories on
which the modern scientific groundwork of anatomy is built.
The following separate anatomical articles
will be found under their own headings:--
Alimentary canal. Nervous system.
Arteries. Nerve.
Brain. Olfactory system.
Coelom and serous membranes. Pharynx.
Connective tissues. Pancreas.
Diaphragm. Placenta.
Ductless glands. Reproductive system.
Ear. Respiratory system.
Epithelial, endothelial and Scalp.
glandular tissues. Skeleton.
Eye. Skin and Exoskeleton.
Heart. Skull.
Joints. Spinal cord.
Liver. Teeth.
Lymphatic system. Tongue.
Mammary gland. Urinary system.
Mouth and salivary glands. Vascular system.
Muscular system. Veins.
HISTORY OF ANATOMY1 In tracing the history of the origin
of anatomy, it may be justly said that more learning than
judgment has been displayed. Some writers claim for it the
highest antiquity, and pretend to find its first rudiments
alternately in the animal sacrifices of the shepherd kings,
the Jews and other ancient nations, and in the art of embalming
as practised by the Egyptian priests.2 Even the descriptions
of wounds in the Iliad have been supposed adequate to
prove that in the time of Homer mankind had distinct notions
of the structure of the human body. Of the first it may
be said that the rude information obtained by the slaughter
of animals for sacrifice does not imply profound anatomical
knowledge; and those who adduce the second as evidence are
deceived by the language of the poet of the Trojan War, which,
distinguishing certain parts by their ordinary Greek epithets,
as afterwards used by Hippocrates, Galen and all anatomists,
has been rather too easily supposed to prove that the poet
had studied systematically the structure of the human frame.
Hippocrates.