“Yes, sir,” answered the collier gravely. “I had a bit of difficulty

with him to-day; he shovelled about half a ton of coals into his mouth,

and Ebenezer Llewellyn and I had a sight of trouble in getting him to

disgorge.”

“You take my advice as a sensible man,” said the surgeon. “It is, first,

if you value the child, to give it more sun and air; it wants it. Sun and

air are more than beef and bread. If the little chap were not as black as

a hedgehog, curled up there at your back, I should say it was bleached

like sea-kale. It won’t do, Shone. The child now must be brought up upon

another system; that is, if you desire it to live and be healthy and

happy—unless you have insured its life, and want to get it under ground

altogether, so as to pocket the insurance money.”

Evans turned as blank as he could, considering the grime on his face. His

jaw dropped.

“But wherever am I to put him?” he asked.

“Now, I have been wanting to see you about this for some while,” said

the surgeon, who was a thoroughly good-hearted man, and who valued and

admired Shone. “There is Shian Thomas, the dressmaker, as good and steady

a wench as I know. She is very badly off. She has been caring for her

poor little crippled sister for several years. Now the child is dead, and

she has had heavy expenses, what with doctor’s bill—mine, you know——”

“Ah!” said Evans, “I know better than that. You were never hard on the

widow or the orphan. What is hard, is to get you to take anything for

your trouble when folks are in need themselves.”

“Well, well! there was the funeral and the mourning,” said the doctor,

laughing and colouring at the same time. “Now Shian [Jane] mopes for

the loss of her sister, and I am sure—I am as sure of this as of

anything—that if you confided the young shaver to her, it would be good

for her, good for the child, and”—he said the last words as he turned

away—“in the end might be good for you.”

Evans walked on his way meditatively. He did not act at once. He waited

a day or two. But as the acquisitiveness of the babe became more

pronounced, he resolved to put it beyond temptation, where it could not

devour coals; and so he arranged with Shian Thomas that she should look

after his child at such time, day and night, as he was at work. But as

soon as ever he returned from the pit, whether in the very early morning

before dawn, or whether in the afternoon, he was to reclaim the child

and carry it home with him. He would not be in the house without it; but

he brought himself to admit that now it was advisable, if not necessary,

that it should no longer go down the pit with him till, as he said, “he

comes of age and takes it upon himself.”

He undertook to make a small payment to Shian for her trouble, which was

of assistance to her in her then straitened circumstances.

“And you may reckon on this, Shone,” said she, “I’ll take every bit as

much care of him as if he were my own. There is an empty place in my

house, and in my heart, since I have lost Bessie, and I will put the

little man there.”

A couple of weeks under the care of Shian told on the child. He put on

fat, became more merry, crowed, chirped, and waxed rosy.

It was a delight to his father to see him, and he did not always return

from the pit alone. One day he brought with him Ebenezer Llewellyn

to criticise the babe and judge whether the improvement was real or

fictitious. He, a father of fourteen children, ten of whom he had reared,

after weighing the little one and turning down his lips to see if the

colour were red, gave verdict that was favourable. Then came what Shian

called “the committee,” a body of workmen on the shift with Shone, to

see with their own eyes that all was going on well with the “shaver.” He

belonged to the pit, and all the men felt an interest in him, and all

wanted to be satisfied that the child was flourishing. All wished to have

their say about him, and to give Shian advice as to how he was to be

dieted and clothed.

More critical than the rest was Shone, and the dressmaker was obliged to

be forbearing with him, for his criticism became at times captious. As,

for instance, on one occasion when he came to resume the child and found

she had cut out for its amusement a score of dancing men and women, the

latter with tall Welsh hats, holding hands, capering vigorously—she had

cut them with her scissors out of a sheet of folded paper—Shone put on a

grave face.

“I think you should not have encouraged levity in the boy,” said he. “I

wouldn’t have the idea put into his head that men and women are created

to dance.”

“But, Shone, they are only paper.”

“Paper or flesh and blood is all the same. They are dancing. I don’t

like it. You can’t be too careful with a child. It’s just when they’re

young that they take in ideas, as they do nourishment—they suck it in in

buckets.”

“How would you have me cut them out?—walking to chapel?”

“That would be better.”

“Shone, if I do that, I must make them prance. One cannot cut out these

paper men and women without giving them high action. You would not have a

whole train of them prancing to church like war-horses!”

The fact of the case was that Shone was slightly jealous. His child

had taken to Shian, he clung to her, dabbed his little mouth over her

cheek—in kisses, and was distinctly more happy with her than with his

father.

Shone was conscious of it, and fought against it. He reasoned with

himself; but could not reason himself out of his jealousy.

Had his child not put on fat, not gained in colour—had it become peevish,

he would have blamed the young woman, and taken it away. But when not

only Ebenezer, but also the “committee,” and his own consciousness

assured him that all was well with the infant—better than it had been

when it lived half its time underground—then he could not withdraw it

from Shian, save for those hours when he was free from work.

So matters went on for a while, and then the situation became aggravated,

for the child began to cry when he took it in his arms to remove it, and

stretched forth its little hands to Shian, and sobbed, and would not be

comforted by the father. It fretted when at home, it screamed, moaned,

was restless. Shone thought it must be ill, and consulted a doctor; he

battled against the assurance that nothing ailed the child, save its

temporary separation from the woman who was as a mother to it.

He worked himself into excitement against Shian; she was stealing

his child’s heart from him. But his good sense returned. She was not

willingly doing this. It was due to the irresistible. The natural nurse

of a babe is a woman, and not a man, and the child instinctively clings

to the nurse.

“I pay her six shillings for it,” grumbled Shone. “He ought to understand

that she is a hireling and not his mother.”

This he said to the doctor, to whom, perhaps unguardedly, he had let out

what embittered his heart.

“Quite so, Evans,” answered the surgeon. “But as the child has not as

yet reached the age of reason in which it can draw such distinctions, why

do you not make Shian its mother?”

Shone opened his eyes, stared at his adviser, turned his back, and walked

away.

But the advice stuck.

Here was a solution to the difficulty, yet not one very pleasing to the

collier. He brooded over his wrong, and also over the redress that lay

open to him. Not a word could be said against Shian. She was a quiet,

hard-working, steady girl.

Shone had taken to her stockings to be darned, garments to be mended, and

had paid her for her work. He was obliged occasionally to call in the

aid of a charwoman to do his washing, and also to clean up his house.

As to his bit of cooking, he did that himself, but was not skilful at

the fire and oven. He fared poorly, and was not infrequently out of

sorts—the cause, his own bad cooking. Now all these inconveniences would

be rectified had he a wife—and yet—and yet——Shone shook his head.

Then an epidemic of scarlet fever broke out in the Dulais Valley. Shone

was frightened. For the sake of his child he considered what was to be

done. Some provision must be made. If the little one sickened, who was

to attend to it?—and attention it would need day and night. The proper

person would be Shian—a stranger would never do. But Shian—he could not

bid her nurse the child in his house, and to have it throughout the long

sickness in hers, and he not with it—that would never do. Besides, she

was a dressmaker. She could not take in needlework when there was risk of

infection in her house. Shone stamped. What was to be done?

“How is it?” he asked, as he came back from the pit.

“Very well, Shone. As usual, very cheerful.”

“No signs of a sore throat? Have you looked?”

“None at all.”

“But suppose he were to get it?”

“Get what?”

“The scarlatina.”

“You need not suppose it. He is quite well.”

“We must provide against the worst.”

“The worst, Shone!”

“Oh!” with a shiver, “I do not mean the worst at all—God forbid; but

against his catching the fever.”

“Well, what will you do?”

“Do, Shian? There is nothing else to be done but for you to marry me. You

see—I do it for the babe’s sake, and because of the infection.”

She was surprised—a little amused.

“And,” put in Shone, a little apologetically, “there are my stockings

want mending. But, really, for the child’s sake, I wish it.”

“I suppose, Shone, if the poor little chap were to be taken ill, he’d be

removed from here?”

“No doubt of it. The sanitary officer wouldn’t allow it here.”

“Nor could I nurse it?”

“Certainly not.”

“Well, then, Shone, for the scarlatina’s sake I don’t mind if I do take

you.”

“Then,” said Shone, “we must look sharp. Let me see his throat. He might

have it come on sudden. I’ll get a license.”

It was certainly an odd proposal and a queer acceptance, and no expense

was spared.

“Bless me,” said Shone, “for the child’s sake, and because of the scarlet

fever, I will stump up a guinea for the license.”

So Shone and Shian were married; and the child did not get scarlatina—so

that all this trouble and expense were, in Shone’s eyes, thrown away.

“Might just as well have chucked it all down a disused coalpit!” said he.

Positively he became grumpy and querulous because his child showed no

signs of drowsiness, sore throat, and eruption. Not that he wished it to

be ill, but he wanted a justification of his marriage.

Shian did her utmost to make him comfortable. She brought the cottage to

a condition of scrupulous cleanliness; she took in hand all his clothes,

she mended them, and made some that he had discarded as neat as new. She

did the washing in a manner very different from that of the charwoman.

Above all, she cooked really-appetising meals that made Shone’s face

relax.

No sooner did he return from the pit than at once she put the child in

his arms. She made no attempt to stand between it and the father. On

the contrary, she talked to the little creature of its daddy when he

was away, and encouraged it to look out for his return. Indeed, as he

came up the street every day, he could see Shian at the door holding up

the child; he could see its arms extended, and the hands clapping with

pleasure at his appearance.

Shian felt that she was an accessory, not a prime factor in the house and

in the well-being of Shone—the baby was the monarch, engrossing all his

affection, occupying all his thoughts. She was accepted as a necessity,

as conducing to the health and happiness of the child—one who could be

and would be dispensed with unless needed for the child’s sake. But she

was a patient, sweet, and uncomplaining woman. She was not a little sad

at heart, and the tears often filled her eyes. She coveted some of the

kisses, some of the endearing terms lavished on the child—some, also,

of the glow of love that lit up the father’s eyes as he watched his

babe. Oh, if only, as he returned from the pit, he had looked at her a

little—just a little—instead of fixing his eyes, from the first moment he

saw it till he had it in his arms, on the child. But she had been taken

into the house, had become Shone’s wife, for the sake of the child; and

she submitted to be regarded with just so much consideration as behoved a

dutiful servant to the little one.

Time went on. Shone began to mend in spirits. He looked more respectable

on Sundays; his digestion was better; he had no more unpleasant attacks

after a meal of what might have been beef, but was leather, which had

troubled him at one time. He had now Yorkshire pudding dipped in gravy;

he had not that in the days of his widowership.

He began to have words for Shian relative to other topics than the baby.

She caught him, by the firelight—as he smoked in the evening and she

knitted—observing her attentively.

Then came Christmas Day.

Now there were sprigs of holly stuck in the windows and about the

mantelpiece. The fire blazed, and was reflected in the burnished Bristol

ware that shone on the dresser as though real copper. And there was a

savoury smell in the house.

“Goose!” exclaimed Shone. “By the powers—goose! And sage and onions,”

said he, after a pause—“I smell them. Goodness me, I wish the boy were

old enough to enjoy it all.”

“Here, father,” said Shian, as she laid the dinner—“here you are—goose,

yes; onion and sage—yes. You would not have goose alone, surely?”

“Well,” said Shone, and his face beamed with peace and goodwill,

“well—to—be—sure.”

“And”—when the first course was over—“I have another pleasure in store

for you.”

“That is——”

“See!” Shian introduced a little Christmas tree, manufactured out of a

branch of fir, and to it were hung two—just two—articles: a cap lined

with swansdown, and trimmed with cherry ribbons, and a long pair of

newly-knitted stockings. “There,” said Shian, “for baby and you—your

Christmas presents. I bring it now, whilst he is awake, that he may enjoy

it with us.”

“Well,” gasped Shone, “this is delightful! How lovely the child will

look in such a glorious bonnet. And how warm my legs will be in these

beautiful stockings.”

“That is not all,” said Shian.

“What more can there be?”

“This!” And she dished up a real Christmas plum-pudding.

When Shone saw this the tears came into his eyes.

“Why, Shian!” he said, and felt a pinch of the heart, “you have thought

for every one but yourself!”

“No, no, father,” said she. “I have had some of the goose, and shall of

the plum-pudding.”

“Some—some!” said he impatiently. “But there is nothing for yourself

particularly.”

Then he jumped up, ran behind her at table, caught her head in his arms,

pressed her face to his heart, and covered brow and lips with kisses.

“O Shian! You have my love—my very heart!”

“Because of—baby?”

“No, not only; because——”

“Of the goose?”

“No—no, not only; because——”

“Of the plum-pudding?”

“No—no; I mean——”

“Because of the long stockings?”

“No, Shian; because of yourself, your own dear, sweet self—the best in

the world!”

“That is my Christmas box, Shone! You could not have given me a better.”

HENRY FROST

HENRY FROST

There is no myth relative to the manners and customs of the English that

in my experience is more tenaciously held by the ordinary Frenchman,

than that the sale of a wife in the market-place is an habitual and an

accepted fact in English life.

It is—so far as my experience goes—quite useless to assure a Frenchman

that such transfer of wives is not a matter of every-day occurrence and

is not legal; he replies, with an expression of incredulity, that of

course English people endeavour to make light of, or deny a fact that is

“notorious.”

In a book by the antiquary Colin de Plancy, on Legends and Superstitions

connected with the Sacraments, he gives up some pages to an account of

the prevalent English custom.

When I was in France a few years ago, in a town church in the south, I

heard an abbé once preach on marriage, and contrast its indissolubility

in Catholic France with the laxity in Protestant England, where “any

one, when tired of his wife, puts a halter round her neck, takes her to

the next market town and sells her for what she will fetch.” I ventured

to call on this abbé and remonstrate, but he answered me he had seen

the fact stated in books of the highest authority, and that my disputing

the statement did not prove that his authorities were wrong, but that my

experience was limited, and he asked me point-blank whether I had never

known such cases. There, unhappily, he had me on the hip. And when I was

obliged to confess that I _did_ know of one such case, “Mais, voilà, mon

Dieu,” said he, and shrugged his shoulders with a triumphant smile.

Now it must be allowed that such sales have taken place, and that this is

so is due to rooted conviction in the rustic mind that such a transaction

is legal and morally permissible.

The case I knew was this.

There lived a tall, thin man in the parish when I was a boy, who was the

village poet. Whenever an event of any consequence took place within the

confines of the parish, such as the marriage of the squire’s daughter,

he came down to the manor-house with a copy of verses he had composed on

the occasion, and was then given his dinner and a crown. Now this man had

actually bought his wife for half-a-crown. Her husband had led her into

Okehampton and had sold her there in the market. The poet purchased her

for half the sum he had received for one of his poems, and led her home

with him, a distance of twelve miles, by the halter, he holding it in his

hand, she placidly, contentedly, wearing the loop about her neck.

The report that Henry Frost was leading home his half-crown wife preceded

the arrival of the couple, and when they entered the village all the

inhabitants turned out to see the spectacle.

Now this arrangement was not very satisfactory to either squire or

rector, and both intervened. Henry Frost maintained that Anne was his

legitimate wife, for “he had not only bought her in the market, but had

led her home, with the halter in his hand, and he’d take his Bible oath

that he never took the halter off her till she had crossed his doorstep

and he had shut the door.”

The parson took down the Bible, the squire “Burn’s Justice of Peace,”

and strove to convince Harry that his conduct was warranted by neither

Scripture nor the law of the land. “I don’t care,” he said, “her’s my

wife, as sure as if we was spliced at the altar, for and because I paid

half-a-crown, and I never took off the halter till her was in my house;

lor’ bless yer honours, you may ask any one if that ain’t marriage, good,

sound, and Christian, and every one will tell you it is.”

Mr. Henry Frost lived in a cottage that was on lives, so the squire was

unable to bring compulsion to bear on him.

When I call the man Frost, I am not employing his real name, because his

relatives are alive, and I know them very well.

Frost, as already intimated, was village bard or poet. I remember well

his coming down to the house with a poem on a transaction of my father’s,

the advisability of which I now greatly doubt.

In our village, the “revel” was kept up every year on the first Sunday

after Trinity Sunday, and the week following. A revel in Devonshire

is the equivalent of the wake in other parts of England, and of the

feast in Cornwall. It used to be celebrated on the day of the saint

to whom the parish church is dedicated. But when the new style came

into use, the conservative rustic mind resisted the change and adhered

to the computation according to the unrevised calendar. Accordingly,

in most places the feast or revel is eleven days after the day of the

patron saint. In some places, however, it is movable. Now our church is

dedicated to St. Peter, accordingly our revel ought to be on the nearest

Sunday after June 29. It is rare indeed that the first Sunday after

Trinity should fall so late, and impossible, I believe, that it could

synchronise with old-style St. Peter’s Day. In 1899 the first Sunday

after Trinity was on June 4—twenty-five days before new-style St. Peter’s

Day, and thirty-six before the feast reckoned by the old style.

There is, however, some reason to believe that the earlier dedication was

to St. Petrock, whose day is June 4, and that the title of the church

was altered in 1261, when reconsecrated. The bishops of Exeter always

endeavoured to get rid of the patron saints when belonging to the Celtic

Church, and substitute for them some who were in the Roman calendar.

The revel at Lew Trenchard agreed much more closely with St. Petrock’s

Day than with that of St. Peter the Apostle.

However, this is neither here nor there. The revel was kept up with

shows, a fair, and horse-races, and it must be allowed there was some

drunkenness.

My father, as squire, and in those days an autocrat, disapproved of the

revel and abolished it, and substituted for it a cottage garden show, on

no very determined date. The revel has never recovered, and the flower

show, after living for two years, died a natural death.

I do not myself believe in the destruction of any ancient institution.

Let it be reformed, but never abolished.

Well, now to the point.

Henry Frost appeared on the occasion of the first flower show with a poem

composed to celebrate the birth of the cottage garden exhibition and the

burial of the revel. It was very laudatory of my father, and every verse

concluded with the refrain—

“For he had a most expansive mind.”

He had used incredible effort to obtain suitable rhymes. In one verse he

had—

“In laudable efforts he was not behind,

For, &c.”

Another ran—

“To drunken abuses never was blind,

For, &c.

Another, in doubtful grammar, ran—

“Among his comperes greatly he shined,

For, &c.”

“Ah,” said my father, “all Henry Frost thinks of in his innermost mind

is that I should have a most expansive pocket, and that he may be able to

get drunk on what he draws from it in reward for his poem.”

When Anne died, then a difficulty arose: under what name was she to be

entered in the register? The parson insisted that he could not and he

would not enter her as Anne Frost, for that was not her legal name. Then

Henry was angry, and carried her off to be buried in another parish,

where the parson was unacquainted with the circumstances. I must say that

Anne proved an excellent “wife.” She was thrifty, clean, and managed a

rough-tempered and rough-tongued man with great tact, and was generally

respected. She died in or about 1843.

Much later than that there lived a publican some miles off, whom I knew

very well; indeed he was the namesake of and first cousin to a carpenter

in my constant employ. He bought his wife for a stone two-gallon jar

of Plymouth gin, if I was informed aright. She had belonged to a

stonecutter, but as he was dissatisfied with her, he put up a written

notice in several public places to this effect—

NOTICE.

This here be to hinform the publick as how G⸺ C⸺ be dispozed to

sell his wife by Auction. Her be a dacent, clanely woman, and

be of age twenty-five ears. The sale be to take place in the ⸺

Inn, Thursday next at seven o’clock.

In this case also I do not give the names, as the woman is, I believe,

still alive. I believe—as I was told—that the foreman of the works

remonstrated, and insisted that such a sale would be illegal. He was

not, however, clear as to the points of law, and he asserted that it

would be illegal unless the husband held an auctioneer’s license, and

if money passed. This was rather a damper. However, the husband was

very desirous to be freed from his wife, and he held the sale as he had

advertised, making the woman stand on a table, and he armed himself with

a little hammer. The biddings were to be in kind and not in money. One

man offered a coat, but as he was a small man and the seller was stout,

when he found that the coat would not fit him he refused it. Another

offered a “phisgie,” _i.e._ a pick, but this also was refused, as the

husband possessed a “phisgie” of his own. Finally the landlord offered a

two-gallon jar of gin, and down fell the hammer with “gone.”

I knew the woman; she was not bad looking. The new husband drank, and

treated her very roughly, and on one occasion when I was lunching at

the inn she had a black eye. I asked her how she had hurt herself. She

replied that she had knocked her face against the door, but I was told

that this was a result of a domestic brawl. Now, the remarkable feature

in these cases is that it is impossible to drive the idea out of the

heads of those who thus deal in wives that such a transaction is not

sanctioned by law and religion. In a parish register in my neighbourhood

is the following entry—

1756. Robert Elford was baptized, child of Susanna Elford by

her sister’s husband; she was married with the consent of her

sister, the wife, who was at the wedding.

In a Quiet Village · 第 5 / 14 段