FAIRIES.—Among the various spiritual beings to whom the credulity of

mankind has given an imaginary existence, the fairies occupy a prominent

place, and are specially worthy of notice. The fairy is distinguished

by one peculiarity from every other being of a similar order. Other

spirits, such as dwarfs, brownies, elves, and such like, are represented

as deformed creatures, whereas the fairy is a beautiful miniature of

“the human form divine”. It is perfect in face, delightful in figure,

and more of angelic than human appearance. These points of distinction,

with generally a dress of bright green, mark the personal individuality

of the fairy. The origin of the fairy superstition is ascribed to the

Celtic race; hence in Ireland, the Highlands and Islands of Scotland,

and Wales, the fairies are even to this day believed by some to exist.

They were usually called “good neighbours,” “Daoine-sithe,” men of peace,

and yet, if offended, they became very inveterate in their spite. They

readily kidnapped unbaptised children, and even adult men and women,

particularly young married females, to become nurses to the fairy

children. They lived under ground, or in little green hills, where the

royal fairies held their courts. In their places all was beauty and

splendour. Their pageants and processions were far more magnificent than

any that Eastern sovereigns could get up or poets devise. They rode

upon milk-white steeds. Their dresses were brilliant beyond conception,

and when they mingled in the dance, their music was more sublime by far

than mortal lips or hands could ever produce. The fairy legends are

numerous and various. From an early period every fairy annalist concurred

in giving to the king and queen of the fairies the name of Oberon and

Titania. Titania, though not under this name, figures in the tale of

Thomas Lermont, commonly called Thomas the Rhymer, one of the earliest

traditions relative to the fairy tribe. Thomas was a distinguished poet

and prophet, who lived near Melrose, and was proprietor of Ercildoune.

The year of his birth is uncertain, but he was an old man when Edward

I. was carrying on war in Scotland. His predictions have long excited

interest in his native country. The following adventure, handed down in

the words of an ancient ballad, befell this individual on the Eildon

hills, in Roxburghshire:—

True Thomas lay on Huntly bank,

A ferlie spied he with his e’e;

For there he saw a ladye bright

Come riding down by Eildon tree.

Her shirt was o’ the grass-green silk,

Her mantle o’ the velvet fyne;

At ilka telt o’ her horse’s mane

Hung fifty siller bells and nine.

The saddle of this visionary beauty’s steed was of ivory, inlaid with

gold. She had a quiver of arrows at her back, with a bow in one hand, and

the other led three beautiful hounds in a leash.

True Thomas he pull’d off his cap,

And louted low down to his knee;

“All hail! thou mighty queen of heaven,

For thy peer on earth I ne’er did see!”

“O no! O no! Thomas,” she said,

“That name does not belang to me;

I am but the queen of fair Elfland,

That am hither come to visit thee.”

By some spell this fairy queen made Thomas her slave. She became changed

into a hideous hag, yet he was compelled to follow her. They entered a

cavern, and after wading through pools of blood, in pitchy darkness for

three days, they reached a beautiful orchard, where the lady resumed her

former dignity and stateliness. She took him to a gorgeous castle, where

he joined with lords, and knights, and ladies in dancing to the most

exquisite music. At the end of what he thought a short time, the queen

told him that he had been seven years in the castle, and that he might

return home. On parting, she gifted him “with a tongue that could never

lie”. There are numberless such fairy legends, but one is enough for a

specimen. Some of the poor creatures arraigned in Scotland for witchcraft

admitted having had correspondence with the fairies. The trials of Bessie

Dunlop in 1576, and of Alison Pearson in 1588, illustrate this statement.

Bessie Dunlop avowed that the ghost of one Thomas Reid appeared to her—a

soldier slain at Pinkie in 1547—that he took her to fairyland, and

introduced her to the queen. Alison Pearson also admitted her familiarity

with the fairies, from whom she had received herbs for the cure of

diseases. It is remarkable that Patrick Adamson, an able scholar and

divine, who was created Archbishop of St. Andrews by James VI., actually

took the medicines prescribed by this poor woman, in the hope that they

would transfer an illness with which he was seized to the body of one of

his horses. These poor women were both convicted, and both were put to

death at the stake. No doubt there are some in the Highlands and Islands

who still believe in the existence of the fairy race. The “sithiche,”

or fairy, is the most active sprite in Highland mythology. It is a

dexterous child-stealer, and must be carefully guarded against. At birth

many covert and cunning ceremonies are still used to baffle the fairy’s

power, otherwise the new-born child would be taken off to fairyland, and

a withered, little, living skeleton of a child laid in its stead. If

offended, they are wantonly mischievous, and hurt severely, and perhaps

kill with their arrows, such as annoy them. These arrows are of stone,

like a yellow flint, and shaped like a barbed arrow-head. They are called

“saighdean sithe,” or fairy arrows. These arrow-heads must have been

extensively used in their warfare by the aboriginal people of the Isles

(and not, of course, by the fairies), as they are still picked up here

and there in the fields, and are all much of the same size and shape. In

Skye, and in the Hebrides in general, the fairies dwelt in green knolls

or hillocks, called “sitheanan,” and there is hardly a parish or district

which has not its “sithean,” or fairy-hill. I knew an old man in Skye

who died about thirty years ago, at the age of about 100, whose name was

Farquhar Beaton. He so firmly believed in fairies and other superstitions

that in his “grace before meat” he prayed thus:—

O Thi bheannuichte, cum ruinn, agus cuidich leinn, agus na

tuiteadh do ghras oirn mar an t-uisge air druim a’ gheoidh.

An uair a bhios fear ’na eigin air gob rutha, cuidich fein

leis; agus bi mu’n cuairt duinn air tir, agus maille ruinn.

Gleidh an t-aosda agus an t-oga, ar mnathan agus ar paisdean,

ar spreidh agus ar feudal, o chumhachd agus o cheannas nan

sithichean, agus o mhi-run gach droch-shula. Bitheadh slighe

reidh romhainn, agus crioch shona aig ar turas.

Which may be translated thus:—

O Blessed One, provide for us and help us, and let not thy

grace fall on us like the rain-drops on the back of a goose.

When a man is in danger on the point of a promontory at sea,

do thou succour him; and be about us and with us on dry land.

Preserve the aged and the young, our wives and our children,

our sheep and our cattle, from the power and dominion of the

fairies, and from the malicious effects of every evil eye. Let

a straight path be before us, and a happy end to our journey.

Many throughout the Highlands and Islands entertained the same firm

belief in the existence of fairies as poor old Farquhar Beaton did. They

were generally deemed harmless sprites—“Daoine-sithe,”—beings that loved

kindness and peace, yet they had their differences and quarrels; and

desperate were their disputes when they took place. Old Farquhar spoke

of many occasions when the fairy fights became fast and furious. The

Macleods of Dunvegan, and the Macdonalds (commonly called the Lords of

the Isles) at Duntulm, had their particular pipers, and their pipe-music

colleges. The Macleods had the distinguished race of MacCrimmons for

centuries, as family pipers, and they had their college at Boreraig,

a tenement near Dunvegan, which they held free. In the same way, the

Macdonalds had the famed MacArthurs as pipers, with the free possession

of Peingowen for their college. A continued rivalry existed between the

MacCrimmons and MacArthurs for supremacy in the musical art, and both

had their particular fairy friends, who were said to supply them with

reeds, and even, at times, with sets of bagpipes. As the famed Muses

of Parnassus inspired their favourite bards with poetic powers, so the

fairies conferred the requisite power on these family pipers to progress

in the proficiency of their art. But at times, so keen were these gay

coadjutors for the success of their particular musical protegés, that

they disputed, and actually fought for the victory, thereby causing their

“sian” dwellings to ring with the din of the conflict. Old Farquhar,

when questioned as to his belief in these things, would raise his hands,

and say, “Mo dha shuil fein a chunnaic iad; mo dha chluas fein a chual

iad.” (My own two eyes beheld them; my two ears heard them.) Farquhar

was a thin, spare, hard-featured, little man, who prided himself on his

ancestry, as a race distinguished for their knowledge of medicinal herbs.

He could trace his genealogy from son to sire, back to ten or twelve

generations, as many others in Skye could do in regard to themselves.

Poor Farquhar had a superstitious dislike to bacon or pork. For many

years before his death he had dinner at the Manse every Sabbath by the

minister’s special request, when he invariably said the above grace

before commencing his meal. It frequently happened that the servants’

dinner consisted of pork or bacon, the look of which Farquhar could not

bear, and yet he often dined on it. The servants, knowing his prejudices,

had beforehand prepared a quantity of the lean parts of the meat for the

old man, which they passed off as mutton, and which he never suspected.

While partaking of it, however, he frequently said, to the no small

amusement and tittering of the domestics—“Bu tu fein an fheoil mhaith,

cheart, agus cha b’i a’ mhuc ghrannda, shalach”; (Thou art the good,

right meat, and not the filthy, unclean pig).

The fairies were said to be very fierce and vindictive when altercations

and differences took place among themselves, and particularly so, when

enemies injured or assailed those with whom they were on friendly terms.

The Jameses, who were jolly monarchs, were in general most auspicious

partisans of these fantastic tribes; at least they considered those

royal personages as such. Perthshire was of old a noted district for the

intrigues of the fairies. The Clan Donnachaidh, or Robertson of Struan,

were not generally favourites with them. During the minority of James V.,

this powerful clan committed bloody outrages over the district of Athole,

at which the fairies were so enraged, that they contrived means whereby

the enemy waylaid the laird of Struan, while visiting his uncle, and

basely assassinated him in the presence of his relative.[8]

In ancient times, the residence of the Athole family was a lofty,

turreted mansion, possessing an air of grandeur characteristic of

feudal times. It is said that it was within this lordly mansion that

the cruel assassin of our first James meditated his bloody purpose. If

credit can be given to Lindsay, the historian, it was here also, about

a century afterwards, that an Earl of Athole entertained, in the most

sumptuous manner, King James V. On that occasion, his Majesty entered

the district of Athole with a numerous retinue, to hunt the deer of the

Grampian hills. A banquet of extraordinary magnificence and splendour

was furnished for the Scottish Monarch. A separate banquetting-hall was

prepared, at a vast expense, for the entertainment of his Majesty and

his retainers. Lindsay says, “That there was no want of meates, drinkes,

and delicacies, that were to be gotten at that time in Scotland, either

in brugh or land. So that he (the King) wanted none of his orders mare

than he had been at home in his own palace. The King remained in this

wilderness (i.e., Athole) at the hunting the space of three days and

three nights, as I have shewn. I heard men say it cost the Earl of Athole

every day in expenses a thousand pounds.” No sooner had the royal visitor

taken his departure than Athole, instigated, as was said, by the fairies,

caused his Highlandmen to set fire to the temporary palace and huts which

had been reared for the occasion, “that the King and the ambassadors

might see them on fire”. Then the ambassador said to the King, “I marvel,

Sir, that you should thole your fair palace to be burnt, that your grace

has been so well lodged in.” Then the King answered,—“It is the use

of our Highlandmen, though they be never so well lodged, to burn the

lodgings when they depart.”

“It would seem,” says Lindsay, “the next visit the King paid to his

Highlandmen, was not marked with so much merriment and banquetting as the

former, for when the King passed into the isles, and there held justice

courts, and punished both thief and traitor, according to their demerits,

syne brought many of the great men of the isles captive with him; such

as Mudyart, Maconnel, Macloyd, Mackay, Macloyd of the Lewis, MacNeil,

Maclane, Macintosh, John Mudyard, Mackenzie, with many others that I

cannot rehearse at this time. Some of them he put in ward, and some bade

in court, and some he took pledges for good rule in time coming. So he

brought the isles, both north and south, in good rule and peace.”

It was believed by the natives in these times, that the King had acquired

power over these chieftains through the influence of the fairies, or some

other evil spirits that had not been on friendly terms with the natives

of the Isles, on account of some injuries received at their hands.

Superstition in those days was at no loss to find a cause for every

revolution and change.

Speaking of the fairies in olden times, they seem to have exercised their

various pranks in different localities, still pointed out in the shires

of Fife and Forfar, as well as in the counties around. The old Castle of

Glammis, a venerable and majestic pile of building, has several fairy

legends connected with it. In an underground part of this old edifice,

there was a secret room, which was only known to two, or at most three

individuals, at the same time, and these were bound not to reveal it, but

to their successors in the secret. It is said to have been haunted, and

at times taken possession of by ghosts and fairies. It has frequently

been the object of search with the inquisitive, but the search has been

in vain. Tradition gives one account, that Malcolm II. was murdered in

this room in 1034, and that the murderers lost their way in the darkness

of the night, and by the breaking of the ice were drowned in the loch of

Forfar. Fordun gives a different account, and states that the King was

mortally wounded in a skirmish near the Castle, and that an obelisk or

large stone of rude design was erected to commemorate the murder, and not

to represent the King’s gravestone, as he was buried at Iona.

Near the summit of Carmylie hill is a large burrow or tumulus, which

was believed at one time by the natives to be a favourite haunt of the

fairies, where, with much splendour, they held their nightly revels. It

still bears the name of “Fairy-folk hillock”.

In the parish of Lunan, in Forfarshire, there is an immense variety of

“knaps” or round hillocks, in different places. Very probably the knaps

had been used as beacons in ancient times, to give notice of alarm on

the approach of an enemy, by means of fires lighted upon them. It is,

however, the case, that various fairy superstitions were connected with

these “sians” or tumuli, of which mention is made to this day. One

ancient practice existed, that the relatives of the dead, the day after

the funeral, carried the chaff and bed-straw on which the body had lain

to the knap nearest to the house, and there consumed them by fire. This

superstition was prevalent in several parts of Scotland.

WITCHCRAFT.—This superstition took its rise in the East, and at an

early period of the world’s history. It was regarded as the power of

magical incantation through the agency of evil spirits. From an early

era, it was pursued as a trade by crafty wretches, who played upon the

weakness of their fellow-creatures. Laws were passed against it. Many

wretches were tortured in order to confess to it; and, to avoid these

preliminary horrors, hundreds confessed all that they were accused of,

and were forthwith led to execution. It has been calculated that, from

the date of Pope Innocent’s bull in 1484 to the final extinction of

these persecutions, no fewer than 100,000 were put to death in Germany

alone. Witchcraft was first denounced in England in 1541, in the reign

of Henry VIII. Previous to that time, however, many witch trials had

taken place, and severe punishments were inflicted. We are all familiar

with the fearful account of the witches near Forres, in the tragedy of

Macbeth. Queen Elizabeth, in 1562, directed a statute exclusively against

witchcraft. Many sad incidents are on record of the effects of this

statute.[9]

The mind of King James VI. was deeply impressed with the flagrant nature

of the crime of witchcraft. Soon after his arrival from Denmark in

1590, to conduct his bride home, the Princess Anne, a tremendous witch

conspiracy was formed against his Majesty’s prosperity. One Mrs. Agnes

Sampson, commonly called “the wise wife of Keith” (a village of East

Lothian), was the principal agent in this horrible work. She was summoned

before the King, and in the words of her trial it is recorded:—“The said

Agnes Sampson was after brought again before the King’s Majestie and

his Council, and being examined of the meetings and detestable dealings

of these witches, she confessed that upon the night of All Hallowe’en

she was accompanied with a great many other witches, to the number of

two hundred, and that all they together went to the sea, each one in a

riddle or sieve, and went in the same, very substantially, with flaggons

of wine, making merry and drinking by the way in the same riddles, or

sieves, to the Kirk of North Berwick, in Lothian, and that after they had

landed, took hands on the land, and danced this reil, or short dance,

singing all with one voice—

Cummer, goe ye before, Cummer goe ye;

Giff ye will not go before, Cummer, let me.

One Geillis Duncan did go before them, playing this reil upon a small

trump until they entered the Kirk of North Berwick. These made the King

in a wonderful admiration, and he sent for the said Geillis Duncan, who

upon the like trump did play the said reill before the King’s Majestie.

Agnes Sampson declared that one great object with Satan and his agents

was to destroy the King by raising a storm at sea when James came across

from Denmark,” and that “the witches demanded of the Divell, why he beare

sic hatred to the King? who answered, by reason the King is the greatest

enemie hee hath in the world.” Such an eulogy, from such a quarter, could

not but pamper the conceit of the easily flattered Scottish monarch!

But we had some cases in the north, which showed that witchcraft was

not confined to the lower classes. Catherine Ross, or Lady Fowlis, was

indicted by the King’s advocate for the practice of witchcraft. She was

anxious to make young Lady Fowlis possessor of the property of Fowlis,

and to have her married to the Laird of Balnagown. Before this could be

effected, she had to cut off her sons in-law, Robert and Hector Munro,

and the young wife of Balnagown. She proceeded to her deadly work by

consulting with witches, making effigies of her intended victims in clay,

and shooting at them with arrows, shod with elf-arrowheads.

The nature of these effigies of clay may be explained. Such as were

intended to be doomed, or destroyed, were formed of clay into hideous

figures, or rude statues larger than life-size. These were called

“cuirp-creadha,” or bodies of clay. Once formed, incantations and

spells were uttered over them. Pins, nails, and feathers were pierced

into them, and fairy arrows darted against them, with fearful oaths and

imprecations. Such things Lady Fowlis resorted to for destroying her

relatives; but when all failed, this abandoned woman had recourse to the

poisoning of ales and certain dishes, by which she put several persons

to death, though not the intended victims. By the confession of some of

the assistant hags, the purposes of Lady Fowlis were disclosed; she was

brought to trial, but was acquitted by a local jury.

These disgraceful proceedings were not without parallel in other

distinguished families of the day. Euphemia Macalzean, daughter of an

eminent judge, Lord Cliftonhall, was burned at the stake for witchcraft

in 1591. This abandoned woman was found guilty by a jury for murdering

her own godfather, as also her husband’s nephew, and others, for which

she was “burnt in assis, quick to the death”.

In the beginning of the reign of Charles II., Morayshire became the

scene of a violent fit of the great moral frenzy, and some of the most

remarkable trials in the course of Scottish witchcraft took place there.

The last justiciary trial for witchcraft in Scotland was that of Elspeth

Rule, who was convicted in 1708, and banished. The last regular execution

for this crime took place in Dornoch in 1722, when an old woman was

condemned to death by David Ross, Sheriff of Caithness. It is difficult

to compute the number of the victims of witchcraft in Scotland, but

attentive inquirers make out that the black list would include upwards

of four thousand persons! And by what a fate did they perish? Cruelly

tortured while living, and dismissed from life by a living death amidst

the flames! And for what? For an impossible crime. And who were the

victims, and who were the executioners! The victims in most cases, were

the aged, the weak, the deformed, the lame, and the blind—those, indeed,

whom years and infirmities had doomed to poverty and wretchedness; yes,

exactly that class of miserable beings for whom Acts of Parliament have

now made comfortable provision—those unfortunate creatures for whose

benefit our more enlightened rulers now provide houses of refuge, erect

poorhouses like palaces, build large asylums, and endow charitable

institutions of every kind. But who were the executioners? The wisest,

the greatest, and the most learned of their time—men distinguished above

their fellows for knowledge and intelligence—ministers of religion and of

the law, kings, princes, and nobles.

It is rather remarkable that, as late as January, 1871, a trial in regard

to witchcraft took place in Newtonwards Quarter Sessions, in County Down.

Hugh Kennedy sued his brother John for payment of a sum alleged to be

due to him for wages and other services. He stated that his brother’s

house and land were frequented by witches, and that he had been employed

to banish them. The witches did not belong to the “good people,” and

were maliciously inclined towards his brother—his land got into a bad

condition, and his cows into a state of settled melancholy. There was

a certain charm of great repute in the neighbourhood for putting to

flight these unwelcome visitors; but it was only useful when properly

applied and performed, and no other person but plaintiff could be got to

undertake the task. The method pursued was thus:—The plaintiff locked

himself in the house alone; he stopped up the keyholes, closed up the

windows, stuffed up the chimney, and, in fact, left no mode of egress to

the unfortunate witches whom he was to summons into his presence. He then

lit a fire and put a pot of milk on it, and into the pot he put three

rows of pins and needles, which had never been sullied or contaminated

by use. These he boiled together for half-an-hour, during which time the

witches were supposed to be suffering the most excruciating tortures,

and had at last to take to flight. They had never been seen or heard of

since. The cows resumed their former healthy condition, and the land its

wonted fertility. The case being of a rather “complicated” nature, it was

left to arbitration. Subsequently, it was announced in court, that the

sum of 10s had been awarded to the plaintiff.

The Prophecies of the Brahan Seer (Coinneach Odhar Fiosaiche) · 第 7 / 11 段