Civility comprehends harmony, system, method, complacency, urbanity,

refinement, politeness, courtesy, justice, culture, general

enlightenment and protection of life and person to any man, regardless

of his color or nationality. It is enough for a civilized community to

know that you are a human being, to pledge surety of physical and

political safety to you, and this has been the sequence in all ages

among civilized people. But such is not the condition of things as

they apply to this country, I mean the United States. True, we have a

National Congress, State Legislature, Subordinate and Supreme Courts,

and almost every form of government, necessary to regulate the affairs

of a civilized country. But above these, and above law and order,

which these legislative and judicial bodies have been organized to

observe, and execute justice in the land, we are often confronted

through the public press with reports of the most barbarous and cruel

outrages, that can be perpetrated upon human beings, known in the

history of the world. No savage nation can exceed the atrocities which

are often heralded through the country and accepted by many as an

incidental consequence. Men are hung, shot and burnt by bands of

murderers who are almost invariably represented as the most

influential and respectable citizens in the community, while the

evidences of guilt of what is charged against the victims, who are so

inhumanly outraged, are never established by proof in any court, and

all we can learn about the guilt and horrible deeds charged upon the

murdered victims comes from the mouth of the bloody handed wretches

who perpetrate the murders, yet they are not known according to

published accounts. But enough is known to get from their mouths same

horrible statements as to why this and that brutal murder was done,

and invariably, it is told with such oily tongues, and the whole

narrative is polished over and glossed with such skillfully

constructed lies, that the ruling millions lift up their hands in holy

horror and exclaim "they done him right."

Why, the very judges surrounded with court officers are powerless

before these bloody mobs. Prisoners are cruelly, fiendishly and

inhumanly dragged from their very custody. Sheriffs are as helpless as

new-born babes. I do not pretend to say that in no instance have the

victims been guilty as a whole or in part of some blood-curdling

crime, for men perpetrate lawless acts, revolting deeds, disgraceful

and brutal crimes, regardless of nationality, language or color, at

times. But civilization presurmises legal adjudication and the

intervention of that judicial authority which civilized legislation

produces. And when properly administered the accused is innocent till

he gets a fair trial; no verdict of guilt from a drunken lawless mob

should be accepted by a civilized country; and when they do accept it

they become a barbarous people. And a barbarous people make a

barbarous nation. Civilization knows no marauders, mobs or lynchers

and any one adjudged guilty by a drunken band of freebooters is not

guilty in the eyes of a civilized people. For the ruthless and violent

perpetrators of lawless deeds, especially when they are incarnate, are

murderers to all intents and purposes, and popular approval does not

diminish the magnitude of the crime. Millions may say, "Well done,"

but God, reason and civilization stamp them as culprits.

I confess that the United States has the highest form of civilized

institutions that any nation has had. Let us take a cursory glance at

the institutions in this country. It has common schools by the tens of

thousands; colleges and universities of every grade by the hundred;

millions of daily newspapers are flying from the press, and weekly

papers and monthly magazines on all imaginary subjects; it has a

Congress and President, Governors and State Legislatures without end,

judges, various courts and law officers in countless numbers. Hundreds

of thousands of school teachers, professors, and college presidents,

and Doctors of Divinity, thousands of lecturers and public declaimers

on all subjects, railroads, telegraphs and telephones in such vast

numbers as stagger imagination itself, churches and pulpits that are

filled by at least a hundred and twenty-five thousand ministers of the

gospel, and Bibles enough to build a pyramid that would almost reach

to heaven; a land of books upon every subject scattered among the

people by the billions, and in short, we have all the forms and

paraphernalia of civilization. But no one can say, who has any respect

for truth, that the United States is a civilized nation, especially if

we will take the daily papers and inspect them for a few moments, and

see the deeds of horror that the ruling powers of the nation say "well

done" to.

I know that thousands, yea millions and tens of millions would not

plead guilty of having a part in the violent and gory outrages which

are often perpetrated in this country upon human beings, chiefly

because they are of African descent, and are not numerically strong

enough to contend with the powers in governmental control. But that is

no virtue that calls for admiration. As long as they keep silent and

fail to lift up their voices in protestation and declaim against it,

their very silence is a world-wide acquiescence. It is practically

saying, well done. There are millions of people in the country who

could not stand to kill a brute, such is their nervous sensitiveness,

and I have heard of persons who would not kill a snake or a bug. But

they are guilty of everything the drunken mobs do, as long as they

hold their silence. Men may be ever so free from the perpetration of

bloody deeds, personally, but their failure to object to any

outrageous crime makes them particeps crimines.

I forgot to say in cataloguing the crimes committed in the United

States that persons for the simple color of their skin are thrust

into what are called Jim Crow cars on the public highways and charged

as much as those who are riding in rolling palaces with every comfort

that it is possible for man to enjoy. This is simple robbery on the

public highways and the nine United States judges have approved of

this robbery and said, "well done," by their verdict.

Such being the barbarous condition of the United States, and the low

order of civilization which controls its institutions where right and

justice should sit enthroned, I see nothing for the Negro to attain

unto in this country. I have already admitted that this country has

books and schools, and the younger members of the Negro race, like the

younger members of the white race, should attend them and profit by

them. But for the Negro as a whole, I see nothing here for him to

aspire after. He can return to Africa, especially to Liberia where a

Negro government is already in existence, and learn the elements of

civilization in fact; for human life is there sacred, and no man is

deprived of it or any other thing that involves his manhood, without

due process of law. So my decision is that there is nothing in the

United States for the Negro to learn or try to attain to.

SECOND PAPER.

WILL IT BE POSSIBLE FOR THE NEGRO TO ATTAIN, IN THIS COUNTRY, UNTO THE

AMERICAN TYPE OF CIVILIZATION?

BY BISHOP L. H. HOLSEY.

[Illustration: Bishop L. H. Holsey]

BISHOP L. H. HOLSEY.

Bishop Holsey was born a slave near Columbus, Ga., July 3,

1842. In 1862 he was married to Miss Harriet Turner, a young

girl who belonged to Bishop Geo. F. Pierce, of the M. E.

Church South, who performed the marriage ceremony in his own

house. His early life was spent in Sparta, La. He was

licensed to preach in 1868 in the M. E. Church South, and

served the Hancock circuit for nearly two years. In 1870 he

pastored the church in Savannah, Ga. Early in 1869 he became

a member of the colored conference which belonged to the M.

E. Church South. This conference was composed entirely of

colored ministers. At this conference Bishop Holsey was

ordained deacon by Bishop Pierce and a year later he was

ordained elder. In the fall of 1870 his conference elected

him a delegate to the first General Conference of the

Colored Methodist Episcopal Church, held in America. This

conference was held in Jackson, Tenn., where the first C. M.

E. Church in America was organized. In 1871 he was sent to

Augusta, Ga., as pastor of Trinity Church and served there

until in 1873 he was elected Bishop of the C. M. E. Church.

In 1881 he was sent to London, England, to represent the C.

M. E. Church in the first ecumenical council. In that

council Bishop Holsey represented his church well. He was

also sent as delegate to the same council, which met in

Washington, D. C., in 1897. He is the founder of Paine

College in Augusta, Ga., which is now in a flourishing

condition. Bishop Holsey has always taken an active part in

all that concerns the C. M. E. Church. He has written all

the messages but one to the General Conferences and has

suggested its entire legislation up-to-date. He also wrote

the Manual of Discipline, and composed the hymnal of the

church, and he is the author of a book of Drawings and

Lectures, containing an autobiography. He has written much

for his church and done many other good things, too numerous

to mention here.

This question is one of pre-eminent importance and interesting alike

to both races. Civilization means culture and refinement. The American

type of civilization is somewhat different from the European and

Asiatic; but, in the main features or characteristics, the world's

great civilizations have always been the same in tone and design.

Patriotism, religion, and a thirst for power are the most prominent

features of all civilizations. All civilizations have their

imperfections. One of the strong features of the American type of

civilization is the widespread and terrible social prejudice, which

seems to be greatly increasing.

In this country the negro is despised and rejected, simply because he

has a black skin, and social traits that distinguish him from other

races. We cannot see, neither do we believe, that it is possible for

the Negro to attain unto the American type of civilization, while he

lives in the same territory and in immediate contact with the white

people. This, however, applies especially to the former slave states.

Eight-tenths of the Negroes are at present in the old slave states,

and if they remain there, which is very questionable, they will never

be brought into the political, religious and social fabrics. They can

never become full-fledged and free citizens like the white people. As

a race, the Negro cannot enjoy in this country, like the Anglo-Saxon,

the immunities and privileges guaranteed to him by the Constitution.

The civil rights, the ample protection and the broad and liberal

sentiment that protect and inspire the white people, are nowhere in

America accorded to the black man. He is everywhere proscribed,

because he is a Negro. No matter how much culture and refinement he

may possess, he does not receive at the hands of the prejudiced whites

that respectful consideration to which his culture entitles him. If we

enter the field of legislative enactments by the Southern people, we

find the prejudice still more pronounced.

Every enactment that has found its way to the statutory documents of

the Southern States, where the rights and privileges of the two races

are involved, shows race prejudice; then this thing is getting no

better, but worse. As the Negro rises from the darkness of the past

and approximates the American standard of civilization, the feeling

against him becomes more intense, bitter and decisive, which does not

speak well for the American civilization.

No Negro, however highly accomplished, can be brought into the social

fabric. The lowest Greek, the dirtiest Jew, the vilest Russian, and

the most treacherous Spaniard can be absorbed and assimilated into the

social compact, but the Negro, because he is black, cannot enter into

this compact.

Unless the Negro can enter the political and social compacts in some

part of this country, there is no way for him to attain unto the

American type of civilization. Can this be done? We think not, because

as the Negro migrates to the North or to the Northwest, the process by

which he enters the arena of full citizenship annuls and destroys his

social characteristics in a greater or less degree.

There is, at present, among the majority of Negroes in the South, an

unrest. Millions of them are waiting and wishing for somebody to lead

them from the land of oppression and proscription to some more

congenial clime, outside of the land of their nativity, but they do

not want to depart, unless they can be assured that by so doing, they

can better their condition. As it is, many are going to the North,

East and West, and the time is fast approaching when the Black Belts

of the South will be things of the past, unless the white people

change their way of treating a Negro. The cotton fields and sugar

farms now maintained by the Negroes will eventually be deserted by

them, if the whites continue to oppress them. This, perhaps, would be

beneficial to the South, as it would relieve them of the perplexing

Race Problem. Now, if the Negroes were as free and as safe in their

homes; if they had the same feeling of security of life and property;

if they had the same treatment before the courts and had all the

rights and privileges of a full citizen, as the white man, he would

not be long in attaining to the American type of civilization. All

Southern people, and many Northern people, for that matter, do not

believe that the Negro is capable of as high a degree of civilization

as the Anglo-Saxon. They believe him to be by nature inferior to the

white man. But I contend that the Negro is not by nature inferior to

the white man, but that he is as capable of reaching the American type

of civilization as the white man. This is obvious from the phenomenal

strides made by him within the past thirty-six years along material,

moral and educational lines.

No one seems to take on and absorb the American civilization more

readily than the American Negro, and if he has the same advantages and

was allowed to enjoy the same full and free citizenship along with his

white neighbor, his advancement in civilization would be as rapid as

that of the white man.

There are to be found now not a few Negro men and women whose culture

and refinement would not suffer by comparison with that of the best

white people of this country. It is not native incapacity and the want

of vital manhood that limit the Negro's progress in civilization, but

it is the fight made against him on the ground of his previous

condition. Remove this and give the Negro the white man's chance and

he will keep pace with the white man in his march toward civilization.

THIRD PAPER.

WILL IT BE POSSIBLE FOR THE NEGRO TO ATTAIN, IN THIS COUNTRY, UNTO THE

AMERICAN TYPE OF CIVILIZATION?

BY R. S. LOVINGGOOD, A. M.

[Illustration: R. S. Lovinggood, A. M.]

PROF. R. S. LOVINGGOOD, A. M.

Prof. R. S. Lovinggood was born in Walhalla, S. C., in 1864.

He came to Clark University, Atlanta, Ga., in 1881, and

remained in school nine years, completing the college course

and taking a course in carpentry. Immediately after

graduating, he began to publish the "Atlanta Times," a

weekly paper, which he continued for two years. He sold out

his interest in the paper, and was elected principal of a

city school in Birmingham, Ala., where he taught with great

success for three years. Here he was married to Miss Lillie

G. England, in 1894. In the fall of 1895, he was elected to

the chair of Greek and Latin at Wiley University, Marshall,

Texas, and entered upon his work with enthusiasm. His wife

died in January, 1896, leaving him a boy only ten days old.

He continued his work at Wiley University for five

consecutive years. His success was notable in this position.

He wrote a work which has received favorable mention in

several papers of high grade. The title of the work is "Why

Hic, Halc, Hoc for the Negro?"

He was married a second time on April 25, 1900, to Miss

Mattie A. Townsend of Birmingham, Ala. In the fall of 1900,

he was elected to the presidency of Samuel Houston College,

Austin, Texas. His success here has been notable. Though

this is a new school, he enrolled 205 the first year. This

is its second year, and the enrollment will doubtless reach

300.

Prof. Lovinggood is a good scholar, a fluent speaker, and an

earnest Christian. He was a delegate to the General

Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church in Chicago in

1900. He is quite popular with the preachers and the people

wherever he goes. A bright future is before him and the

young school of which he is president.

I presume it is not necessary to show in detail what the American type

of civilization is, or will be. Whatever that type is, or may be; will

the Negro attain unto it in this country? Of the American type of

civilization this much may be said, that this is a "government of the

people, for the people and by the people; that all men are created

with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty

and the pursuit of happiness;" that governments derive "their just

power from the consent of the governed;" that in such governments each

individual is entitled to all the rights vouchsafed to any other

individual in that government; that every one is entitled to stand on

his merits as a citizen of the government.

Taking this view of the American type of civilization, will it be

possible for the Negro to attain unto it? Will the time ever come when

the Negro will stand on his merits in our government? Will it ever be

that the Negro will stand the same chance to be Mayor, Congressman,

Senator, Governor, President? That he will be tried for crimes as

other men are tried? No one who believes in the innate capacity of the

Negro to achieve as high a type of civilization as any other race,

will question that it will be possible for him to achieve the

American type of civilization along the lines of invention, commerce,

philanthropy, scholarship, etc. The Negro _can be_ industrious,

patriotic, courageous. He can be useful in the community in which he

lives. He can be as good as anybody else. No one doubts that he can be

as meritorious as any other. Geographical lines cannot prevent the

Negro from being meritorious. Now, if he is meritorious, will he be

treated according to his merits in both church and state? Is it

possible in this country that he will be treated according to his

deserts? I take this to be the gist of the question, and it is a hard

one to answer. The prejudice against the Negro is more severe than

that against any other people, and the prejudice grows stronger. Even

the Christian churches are yielding to it. I remember that the

Plebeians in the Roman Empire, though of the same blood as the

Patricians, were excluded from the Comitia, the Senate and all civil

and priestly offices of the state for several hundred years. Though of

the same color, the statute of Kilkenny prohibited the Irish and

English from intermarrying in the fourteenth century. Prejudice ran

high, and has not ended yet. The wail of sorrowful Ireland continues

to go up before England for justice. I remember the sad story of

Kosciusko and the Poles. The Poles were white.

Here we are of a different color, ex-slaves, poor, beaten back by

prejudice. Who can tell our future? We can only hope and give the

reason for the hope that is in us.

I believe it is _possible_ for us to succeed in America. I should

despair if I did not believe this. Why do I believe it? Here is my

ground for hope: First, the Negro is the only race that has ever

looked into the face of the blue-eyed Anglo-Saxon without being swept

from the face of the earth. There is that docility, that perseverance,

that endurance, long-suffering patience and that kindness in the Negro

which rob the pangs of the hatred of the white man of much of their

deadly poison. The Negro thrives on persecution. He never loses faith.

Individuals may lose hope, but the race will never. The Negro does not

run against the buzz-saw of destruction, and this fact should be put

down to his credit. The saw will not whirl forever.

Second: The success of the last thirty-seven years gives hope of

ultimate triumph. The Negro has increased in intelligence, in wealth,

in moral worth, in population, etc. It is useless to give figures. All

right-thinking men admit this.

I take no part in that view of a few pessimists, that the Negro race

grows worse; that the "old time Negro" is better than the young "new

Negro." The old Negro was submissive because he was not allowed to be

otherwise. There is no character in slavish goodness. Character must

be developed in freedom of action. Under freedom, a few young Negroes

have gone to excess, but, thank God, under freedom, hundreds of

thousands of young Negroes, in schools and out of schools, are

struggling up the hill of virtue, of industry, of learning, not goaded

on by the lash of the master, but impelled by a holy ambition that

does not halt at temporary defeats.

Third: So I believe the Negro will be as good as any. He will produce

his poets, historians, philosophers, inventors, his men of commerce,

his humanitarians. His present disenfranchisement will keep him along

these lines. The best people in America are helping him. Besides the

Negro's own efforts in such organizations as the A. M. E. Church, the

American Missionary Association of the Congregational Church, the

Freedmen's Aid and Southern Educational Society of the Methodist

Episcopal Church, the Home Mission Society of the Baptist Church, and

many other organizations are behind him with millions of dollars, with

prayers and with the souls and the flesh and blood of the best men and

women of the world. There are good men North and South--white men--who

desire the Negro's success. Their number will grow. With these helps

the Negro can become noble in character. He can merit the best at the

hands of the American people. If he is as good and useful as any other

class of people, will he be treated as any other class?

Fourth: Now, I will go a little further and say I know it is

"possible" for the Negro to attain unto the American type of

civilization; but, is it "probable"? I even believe it is probable.

The Negro is included in the "all men are created with certain

inalienable rights." He is included in the "Our Father." He is

included in the "Whatsoever ye would that men should do unto you, do

you even so unto them." Now, if the nation adopts some separate and

unjust manner of treatment of the Negro, it must repudiate the

Declaration of Independence. It must repudiate the Lord's Prayer. It

must repudiate the Golden Rule. Can it do that and survive? Can it

practice injustice upon the Negro and survive? Sin recoils upon the

sinner. Injustice to the Negro will destroy the Nation. For that

reason good white men and women are striving to bring the Nation up to

that high plane of righteousness where justice is meted out to all

alike. These good white men and women ought to conquer. I believe they

will. Not to-day, but to-morrow. Thus the Negro, striving to be the

best in the community, the white men, striving to reduce to practice

the Golden Rule, may it not come to pass that "They shall beat their

swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks," and that

the country of Lincoln shall thus become the "land of the free and the

home of the brave," where all men of all races shall be treated in all

departments of life according to their worth?

FOURTH PAPER.

WILL IT BE POSSIBLE FOR THE NEGRO TO ATTAIN, IN THIS COUNTRY, UNTO THE

AMERICAN TYPE OF CIVILIZATION?

BY BISHOP J. W. HOOD, D. D., LL. D.

[Illustration: Bishop J. W. Hood, D. D.]

BISHOP J. W. HOOD, D. D., LL. D.

The subject of this sketch was born in Kennett Township,

Chester County, Pa., May 30, 1831. His father's house being

near the line between freedom and slavery was a station of

the Underground Railroad. Hence, the boy was very early

impressed with the evils of slavery and imbibed an intense

hatred toward that institution, and an intense love for his

afflicted race. This sentiment has been a great factor in

shaping his conduct through life. His moral and religious

convictions were fixed in early life. He was sensible of a

call to the ministry, but hesitated a long time because he

felt a lack of necessary qualification. He was licensed to

preach in 1856; ordained a deacon in 1860; elder in 1862,

and bishop in 1872. He entered upon a course of studies soon

after he was licensed, and has been a hard student ever

since.

His first appointment was to a mission in Nova Scotia. In

December, 1861, he was appointed to missionary work in the

South. Following the army, he reached New Berne, N. C.,

January 20, 1864. As a traveling minister he always had

encouraging success, especially in North Carolina, in which

State his denomination has a larger following than in any

other. Two of its most important institutions are located

there, namely, the Publication House at Charlotte and

Livingstone College at Salisbury. Bishop Hood is one of the

founders of the college, and has been President of the Board

of Trustees during its entire history.

He has been married three times, and has six living

children, all of whom have been mainly educated at this

institution. The Bishop is an untiring worker, and has

traveled as much as 20,000 miles a year. He once preached

forty-five sermons in thirty-one days, driving from five to

twenty-five miles a day. He is a natural presiding officer

and governs his conferences with an ease and quietness that

is astonishing.

Twentieth century Negro literature · 第 5 / 56 段