CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RUINS OF SYNAGOGUES.

Haifa, Feb. 16.—I described in my last letter the discovery of the ruins

of an ancient Jewish synagogue at a spot on the east bank of the Jordan,

about three miles north of the upper end of the Lake of Tiberias. As the

question of ancient Jewish synagogues is one of great interest, in

regard to which considerable misapprehension prevails even among

archæologists, I may be excused for entering upon a short disquisition

upon the subject, as I am not aware that the great light which has been

thrown upon it by recent Palestinian research has yet been distributed

in a popular form to the general public, and the old and recognized

authorities are often misleading. For example, “Smith's Dictionary of

the Bible” contains a long article on Jewish synagogues which has

hitherto been considered the great authority on the subject, in which I

observe that it states under the sub-head “Structure:”

“Its position, however, was determined. It stood, if possible, on the

highest ground in or near the city to which it belonged. Its direction,

too, was fixed. Jerusalem was the Kibleh of Jewish devotion. The

synagogue was so constructed that the worshippers, as they entered and

as they prayed, looked towards it.”

This may have been the case in respect of the earlier synagogues, long

anterior to the time of Christ, the traces of which have been lost, but

in the case of eleven which have been discovered by the officers of the

Palestine Exploration Fund, since the above was written, no such rules

have been adhered to. These all date either from the time of Christ, or

shortly before it, to three centuries after it. We know they were

synagogues, and can approximately calculate their dates, from the Hebrew

inscriptions found on some of them, and from the emblems with which they

were ornamented, such as the pot of manna, the seven-branched

candlestick, and other purely Jewish devices. In the cases of these

synagogues, many of which I have seen, the builders have by no means

selected the most prominent positions; the existing remains have, with

two exceptions—at Irbid and at ed-Dikkeh, where the ground would not

admit of such an arrangement—their doors on the southern side, so that

every Jew entering would have to turn his back on Jerusalem. The ark, if

there was one in these synagogues, would necessarily, in that case, be

placed at the northern end, and the worshippers would therefore have to

pray with their backs to Jerusalem.

We know, besides, how abhorrent to the Jews were the figures of animals,

and the popular impression has been that none such were permitted to

decorate their synagogues; yet in these synagogues we find them

prominently carved in stone in six out of the eleven. The carved figure

I found at ed-Dikkeh makes a seventh, and they probably existed in the

others and in greater quantities than those already noted, but have been

destroyed by the Mohammedans as contrary to their religion. As may be

supposed, as they were all built at nearly the same period, there is a

great similarity in the architecture of the synagogues recently

discovered. It is of an extremely florid and somewhat debased Roman

type. In all of them the same class of mouldings is observable. There is

a great resemblance in the niches and cornices, while the capitals show

some variation, being Corinthian, Doric, and Ionic. There is also a

great similarity in the ground plan and in the position of the columns.

In the case of a Roman temple these are all in colonnades outside the

building, in cases of synagogues they are all within it. There should be

no possibility, therefore, of confusing a synagogue with a Roman temple,

even though it abounds with Roman architecture; but it is not always so

easy to distinguish it from an early Christian church, or basilica,

where the columns were also inside. The reason that the architecture of

these latter synagogues was so purely Roman in character is to be found

in the conditions under which they were built. Shortly after the

destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans, the Jewish Sanhedrim was

established at Tiberias, under a patriarchate whose authority was

recognized by the foreign communities at Rome and in Asia Minor, and

large numbers of these came to live in the district, while alms poured

into the treasury at Tiberias from all directions. It thus became very

wealthy, and the centre of a great Jewish population. It was recognized

by the Romans, and by them granted many indulgences, and, during the

reign of Antoninus Pius, A.D. 138–161, increased in power and influence.

At the beginning of the third century the Jews were in high favor with

the Emperor Alexander Severus, who was even called the Father of the

Synagogue, and this name may have been given him from his influence over

the erection and architecture of these buildings. It seems, therefore,

almost a certainty that the Roman emperors aided and inspired the

erection of these synagogues. They were built by Roman labor, for the

Jews, being immersed in commercial pursuits, by using Roman workmen,

obtained much finer results than we are led to think they would

themselves have been capable of. No synagogues of the kind have been

found in other countries, though there were many in Babylon and in the

colonies of the Jews, and this type has never been perpetuated in later

works, while we have seen how many points in their religion were

disregarded in their design and ornamentation. We may therefore suppose

that they were forced upon the people by their Roman rulers at a time

when they were completely submissive to their power, and directly they

were able they deserted such pagan buildings as a disloyalty to their

religion. It is stated that Rabbi Simon, son of Jochai, is the founder

of many of these buildings. Indeed, it is related that he built with his

own money twenty-four synagogues in this part of the country. As he was

a most fanatical teacher of the law, it is evident that if he erected so

many buildings in such violent contradiction to many points of his own

religion, he must have done it under great pressure. These synagogues

built under Roman auspices were probably only an alternative evil; they

had to choose between having them or none at all. With the exception of

one on Carmel, and a problematical one at Shefr-Amr, about six miles

from Haifa, all the synagogues hitherto found have been within the

immediate limits of what was formerly the patriarchate of Tiberias. The

fact that the building at ed-Dikkeh would be included in this district

is an additional reason for assuming it to have been one of this class

of synagogues, and, if so, we should probably be accurate in fixing its

date at somewhere in the first or second century after Christ.

From ed-Dikkeh I proceeded under the guidance of the old sheik, who was

much pleased at the satisfaction which I evinced at his successful

leadership thus far, in an easterly direction to another place, where he

assured me that the villagers had also been at work getting out stone

during the summer, and had unearthed some more old ruins. Our way led us

along the flank of the Jaulan hills, with the plain of the Butêha on our

right, and, after a ride of about an hour, we reached a village of huts,

in the midst of which was the anticipated excavation. I could not quite

expect such another stroke of luck as that which had befallen me at

ed-Dikkeh, but yet I had no reason to be dissatisfied. Here, upon a

terrace built of large blocks of basalt about five inches in height, I

found a curious condition of things. The villagers had laid bare,

eighteen inches below the surface of the earth, the cement floor of an

old chamber about twenty feet in one direction. I could not tell how far

it went in the other, as it was still covered with earth, but where it

abruptly terminated it revealed, about eighteen inches beneath, another

floor of some building of much older date, across which it had been

built diagonally. This floor was of stone. It, too, had been cleared for

some distance by the natives, and upon it was standing, at intervals of

six feet apart, five solid cubes of stone, measuring two feet each way,

which had probably been the foundations or lower stones on which had

been placed the pedestals of columns. As this lowest floor was three

feet below the present surface of the ground, the top of these stones

was one foot below it, and the line of them may have continued, though

only five had been uncovered. I have no means of conjecturing what the

building may have been. I found many fragments of columns and capitals

strewn around among the ruins, which covered a larger area than those at

ed-Dikkeh, and which, like them, are a new discovery, though what its

results may be must depend very much upon further excavation. I

impressed upon the villagers here, as I had already done at ed-Dikkeh,

if, in the course of their excavating for stone, they came upon any with

inscriptions or pictorial representations, to preserve them; but I felt,

as I did so, that my words fell upon deaf or rather unwilling ears. They

gazed at me with alarmed stolidity, either not understanding or not

caring to understand, and evidently dominated by the fixed impression

that my proceedings implied in some way the future ownership of the

soil. I looked from here wistfully up a valley, at the mouth of which

this ruin was situated, and at the head of which others were reported to

exist, but circumstances prevented me at the time from pushing my

explorations in this direction. Indeed, travel in this part of the

country is attended with many difficulties, some political and some

material, among the latter the chief one being, if one is unprovided

with a tent, the question of where one is to spend the night. If, on the

other hand, one is provided with a tent, it involves a much larger

retinue, increased expense, excites even more distrust among the

natives, and becomes sometimes dangerous from arousing their cupidity,

and this necessitates having guards and escorts, which are the cause of

endless quarrels and annoyance, as the more people you have with you the

less are you your own master to go where you like, and the more

difficult it is to provide for man and beast. It is a choice of evils at

best of times, and the worry and discomfort can only be compensated for

by good luck in obtaining results, and this is by no means always to be

secured, though thus far on this particular journey I had had no reason

to complain. I now propose to tempt fate on the highlands to the east of

Lake Tiberias, with what success remains to be seen.

Haifa; or, Life in modern Palestine · 第 57 / 85 题