CHAPTER XXVI

DEATH OF DR. MITFORD

The terrible calamity which marred Miss Barrett’s health-seeking

sojourn in Torquay so unnerved her that it was feared her reason

would give way and that she would succumb to her grief. Under these

circumstances it was decided to remove her without delay back to

Wimpole Street, the long journey, by road, being undertaken in a

specially-constructed carriage in which a number of contrivances had

been embodied in order to avoid any jarring or other inconvenience to

the invalid. From that date onward numberless letters passed between

the two friends—Miss Barrett with her burden of sorrow and Miss

Mitford with her load of care and poverty.

The friendship was of such a character that each wrote to the other

with the greatest freedom and there can be no doubt that this

interchange of ideas and outpouring of heart afforded a blessed

relief to both, and especially to Miss Mitford, who had so few

intimates among women. Indeed we may safely affirm that it was to

only two people—William Harness and Miss Barrett—that Miss Mitford

ever really laid bare her true self. Thus in the letters of 1842, a

year destined to rank as the most trying and painful in the whole of

Miss Mitford’s life, we find her telling out frankly the full tale of

her miseries.

“It will help you to understand how impossible it is for me to earn

money as I ought to do, when I tell you that this very day I received

your dear letter, and sixteen others; that then my father brought

the newspaper to hear the ten or twelve columns of news from India.

By that time there were three parties of people in the garden; eight

others arrived soon after—some friends, some acquaintances, some

strangers. My father sees me greatly fatigued—much worn—losing

my voice even in common conversation; and he lays it all to the

last walk or drive—the only thing that keeps me alive—and tells

everybody he sees that I am killing myself by walking or driving; and

he hopes that I shall at last take some little care of myself and not

stir beyond the garden. Is not this the perfection of self-deception?

And yet I would not awaken him from this dream—no, not for all the

world—so strong a hold sometimes does a light word take of his

memory and his heart—he broods over it—cries over it!” This was

written to excuse herself from accepting an invitation to town.

Later she details how, when her father was at last got to sleep,

she stole out of the house at night with Flush, the spaniel, and

the puppies, for a scamper round the meadows. “How grateful I am,”

she added, “to that great, gracious Providence who makes the most

intense enjoyment the cheapest and the commonest!”—truly she was

thankful for the small mercies—“And my father tells me I am killing

myself—as if that which is balm and renovation were poison and

suicide.

“It is now half-past one and my father has only this very moment gone

into his room to bed. He sleeps all the afternoon in the garden,

and then would sit up all night to be read to.” Then, as if the

cares of the household were not enough, the Doctor invited “that

gander feast, the Reading Whist Club, out to dine; and then, between

helping to cook, and talking and waiting upon the good folks, we

got the stiffness rubbed out of our bones in a wonderful manner.”

The stiffness alluded to was occasioned by being caught in a storm

while out driving, but it will be noticed there is no mention of

the expense of this “gander feast,” arranged, as it was, simply in

order to satisfy that father, whom to cross might result in his

prostration and tears! “I am content to die,” she wrote, “if only

preserved from the far bitterer misery of seeing my dear, dear father

want his accustomed comforts; content, ay, happy, if that far deeper

wretchedness be spared.” It was indeed fortunate, in a sense, that

Miss Barrett was willing to read all this and never question the

attitude adopted by her friend to this selfish father. Possibly it

was patent to all who knew Miss Mitford intimately that to attempt

to question the wisdom of her self-sacrifice could only result in

adding pain to a heart already over-full with grief. Happily, too,

there were occasional breaks to this almost incessant gloom. In July

she wrote to say how gratified she had been at learning from a friend

that, while travelling in Spain, and being laid up with illness,

longing for “some English or English-like book, he received a Spanish

translation of _Our Village_. A real compliment, and I tell you of

it, just as I told my father, because I know that it will please your

dear heart.”

Then in September she was greatly gratified by receiving a respectful

invitation to lay the foundation stone of a new reading-room in

Reading. The invitation was accepted and the pleasure enhanced by the

insistence of the “dear papa” that he should make one of the party.

The arrival of the Mitfords was not less imposing than the ceremony

itself, the four persons absolutely necessary to help the Doctor in

and out of his very low carriage being sent on beforehand to await

his arrival, amid the cheers of the assembled crowd. The function was

followed by a tea-party and concert, to which the visitors stayed.

“If ever I am ungrateful enough to bemoan my isolated position, I

ought to think over the assemblage in order to feel the thankfulness

that thrilled through my very heart at the true and honest kindness

with which I was received. It was an enthusiasm of man, woman, and

child—hundreds—thousands—such as I can hardly venture to describe,

and it lasted all the time I stayed. Indeed, the pleasure amounted

to pain, so confusing was it to hear the over-praise of which I felt

myself unworthy. But it was not the praise that was so touching,

it was the kindness, the affection. My father cried, K——[29]

cried, Dora Smith cried, I think more than all, at the true, honest,

generous heartiness of the people.”

And there was yet another event to be recorded, something so

wonderful that news of it must, perforce, be sent to the friend in

London. The Doctor, dining with a friend off a brace of grouse sent

by another friend, “took three glasses of claret, and afterwards two

glasses more; enjoying them, not taking them, as he does the gravy,

medicinally; but feeling the pleasure, the strange pleasure, that

gentlemen do feel in the scent and taste of fine wine, especially

when shared with a friend. _And he called me again, ‘my treasure,’_

always his favourite word for his poor daughter. It rejoices my

heart. _Of course its previous omission was accidental._ I feel sure

now that he was not angry; but before, I had _so_ feared it; and it

had _so_ grieved me—grieved me to the very bottom of my heart. So

that, if it had pleased God to take him _then_, I do believe that

I should have died of very grief. I thought that I must have said

something, or done something, or left something unsaid or undone,

that had displeased him. _Now_, so far as that goes, my heart is at

ease, and it is the taking off of a great load.”

This was written on November 20. A day or two afterwards the Doctor

grew suddenly worse, so bad indeed that his daughter feared for his

life. The days were spent in watching and praying by his bedside,

with reading from St. John’s Gospel, “which he and I both prefer,”

and with frequent visits from the Shinfield clergyman, who must have

noted what was, possibly, hidden from the daughter’s eyes, that the

old man was sinking fast. By the last day of November his condition

was most alarming, so much so that as Dr. May from Reading had

not arrived, Miss Mitford set off with Ben, the gardener, in the

pony-chaise to fetch him. It was a Sunday evening, pitch-dark, and

they had to trust to the pony’s instinct to find their way. Dr. May

was not at home when they arrived, and, after a fruitless wait for

him, and receiving some advice from the physician’s partner, they

set off home again at seven o’clock. The darkness was still intense,

so that they could see little before them, and they had just reached

a spot half-way to home when two footpads sprung at them from the

hedge on either side the road. One wrenched the reins from Ben, the

other seized Miss Mitford’s umbrella; the pony, plunging from the

tug at the reins, caused one of the miscreants to swerve in the act

of aiming a blow with a bludgeon at Ben. The blow descended on the

pony’s flanks, making it dart forward with a terrific plunge and then

tear madly off home. The suddenness of the whole thing threw off both

the men, one of whom fell beneath the chaise and was run over. By a

merciful Providence no vehicle or other person was met on the road,

for Ben could not control the pony until the cottage was neared,

when the sagacious creature slowed up of its own accord and stopped

quietly at the door.

No hint of this adventure reached Dr. Mitford, lest the shock should

make him worse, although, naturally enough, Miss Mitford would gladly

have told him, so shaken and unnerved was she. Weak and ill, the

brave and unselfish woman watched by her parent, tending and nursing

him, allowing no one to take the principal duties from her; rarely

sleeping, and then only when forced to do so from sheer exhaustion,

until at last, early on the morning of December 11, the death of her

father released her from the long vigil.

“All friends are kind and very soothing,” wrote the stricken woman

to Miss Barrett, “but not half so soothing as your sweet kindness,

my dearest. Oh! let me think of you as a most dear friend—almost

a daughter, for such you have been to me.... Everybody is so kind!

The principal farmers are striving who shall carry the coffin.

Surely this is not common—to an impoverished man—one long

impoverished—one whose successor is utterly powerless! This is

disinterested, if anything were so, and therefore very touching,

very dear. Perhaps I have shed more tears for the gratitude caused

by this kindness and other kindnesses than for the great, great

grief! That seems to lock up the fountain; this to unseal it.

Bless you, my beloved, for all your inimitable kindness! Oh! how

_he_ loved to bless you! He seldom spoke the dear name without the

benediction—‘Miss Barrett! dear Miss Barrett! Heaven bless her!’ How

often has he said that! I seem to love the name the better for that

recollection.... I am resigned—indeed I am. I know that it is right,

and that it is His will.”

The funeral was an imposing affair; “the chief gentry of the country

sent to request to follow his remains to the grave; the six principal

farmers of the parish begged to officiate as his bearers; they came

in new suits of mourning, and were so deeply affected that they

could hardly lift the coffin. Every house in our village street was

shut up; the highway was lined with farmers and tradesmen, in deep

mourning, on horseback and in phaetons, who followed the procession;

they again were followed by poor people on foot. The church and

churchyard were crowded, and the building resounded with tears and

sobs when the coffin was lowered into the vault. The same scene

recurred on the ensuing Sunday, when every creature in the crowded

congregation appeared in black to hear the sermon—even the very

poorest wearing some sign of the mourning that was so truly felt.”

This was, as may be easily inferred, Miss Mitford’s own account

of the proceedings, but, as Mr. H. F. Chorley pointed out in his

published volume of her letters, although one cannot doubt the

sincerity of the report, it was one “utterly baseless on anything

like fact, or the feelings of those who knew the whole story. Dr.

Mitford was tolerated because she was beloved. The respect paid to

his remains was not so much to them as to her.”

When all was over, there came the inevitable day of reckoning, and

Miss Mitford had to face an appalling list of debts accumulated

by her father’s extravagance, liabilities amounting to close upon

£1,000. The sum seems incredible in view of Miss Mitford’s earnings

and of the help which had been periodically obtained from William

Harness in addition to the State pension. How can such a condition

of affairs be accounted for? A clue is, we think, to be found in a

letter which Miss Mitford wrote to a friend some six months before

her father died. “At eighty, my father is privileged to dislike

being put out of his way in the smallest degree, as company always

does, so that I make it as unfrequent as possible, and the things

that weigh upon me are not an occasional bottle or two of port or

claret or champagne, but the keeping two horses instead of one, the

turning half a dozen people for months into the garden, which ought

to be cultivated by one person, and even the building—as I see he

is now meditating—a new carriage, when we have already two, but

too expensive. These _are_ trials, when upon my sinking health and

overburdened strength lies the task of providing for them;—when,

in short, I have to provide for expenses over which I have no more

control than my own dog, Flush.... It is too late now for the

slightest hope of change; and his affection for me is so great, that

to hint at the subject would not only shock him, but perhaps endanger

his health.”

Thus, with a heritage of liabilities, Miss Mitford came back from her

father’s funeral to think out some scheme of personal effort which

would not only give her something upon which to exist but remove the

stigma attaching to her father’s name. When the true state of affairs

became public property her friends decided to raise a subscription

in the hope of clearing the whole amount. Nothing short of complete

satisfaction to all creditors would content Miss Mitford, who

determined that “everybody shall be paid, if I have to sell the gown

off my back, or pledge my little pension.”

The subscription project was taken up very heartily, appeals, signed

by many influential people, being printed in the _Times_ and _Morning

Chronicle_, and by the following March nearly a thousand pounds had

been received, with a promise of further donations amounting to

some hundreds, the final idea of the promoters being that not only

should the debts be paid but that a goodly amount should be handed

over to Miss Mitford wherewith to make a fresh start and to provide

an annuity. Writing on the subject to Miss Jephson, Miss Mitford

intimated that the Queen was among the subscribers, but desired that

her name be not mentioned, “as she gives from her private income, and

fears being subjected to solicitation (this adds to the compliment,

as it proves it is not a matter of form).” In addition to this there

were contributions from many of the nobility and notables in the

literary and artistic world, thus testifying to the great esteem in

which Miss Mitford was held. It must have been very gratifying to

her to be thus remembered in this her bitterest hour of need. Nor

was this the only evidence of goodwill, for many of the neighbouring

gentry vied with each other in paying little attentions to the

lone woman, in offers of hospitality and in a hundred small and

unostentatious ways, which touched her deeply. “I never before had

an idea of my own popularity, and I have on two or three occasions

shed tears of pure thankfulness at reading the letters which have

been written to, or about, me.... I only pray God that I may deserve

half that has been said of me. So far as the truest and humblest

thankfulness may merit such kindness, I am, perhaps, not wholly

undeserving, for praise always makes me humble. I always feel that I

am over-valued; and such is, I suppose, its effect on every mind not

exceedingly vainglorious.”

Perhaps the most touching of the many kindnesses now showered upon

her was that of Mr. George Lovejoy, the famous bookseller of Reading,

who made her free of his large and very complete circulating library

and afforded her a most lavish supply of books. The Library was

founded in the year 1832 by Mr. Lovejoy and came to be regarded as

the finest of its kind in the Provinces. He was, himself, a man of

considerable learning and possessed amiable characteristics which

endeared him to all and sundry, especially to the children, who were

in the habit of appealing to him to solve any problems which might

be bothering their small heads, whilst he was frequently besieged by

them for pieces of string in the peg-top season. And not only did the

children consult him, for he gathered about him quite a number of

literary people to whom he was indeed a counsellor and friend. His

shop was the rendezvous for the County, among the most frequent

visitors being Charles Kingsley—Eversley being but fourteen miles

distant—and Miss Mitford, with any literary friends who happened to

be calling on her at the time. “In general we can get any books we

wish at the excellent Reading library (Lovejoy’s); he, or I, have

all you mention,” wrote Miss Mitford to a friend who had suggested

certain books for perusal.

[Illustration: Mr. George Lovejoy, Bookseller, of Reading.]

“I have been too much spoiled,” she wrote later; “at this moment

I have eight sets of books belonging to Mr. Lovejoy. I have every

periodical within a week, and generally cut open every interesting

new publication—getting them literally the day before publication.”

The Lovejoy Library was noted from its earliest days for the very

fine collection of Foreign works which it contained, and this alone

would have made it invaluable to Miss Mitford, whose love for French

and Italian literature was remarkable.

Then, too, Mr. Lovejoy undertook little commissions for his friend

when she required anything obtained specially in London, getting

his London agents to enclose the goods in his book parcel and, when

received, despatching it by special messenger to the cottage at Three

Mile Cross. Throughout the letters he is frequently referred to as

“Dear Mr. Lovejoy,” or “My dear friend, Mr. Lovejoy. Nobody certainly

ever had such a friend as he is to me, and all his servants and

people are as kind as he is himself.”

So, with kind friends about her, Miss Mitford strove to forget

her sorrow and to devote herself once more to literary work.

Unfortunately, however, the cottage was once again showing itself the

worse for wear, and it was a question as to whether it should not be

given up in favour of some other habitation near at hand. It was at

length decided, at the suggestion of Mr. Blandy, of Reading—who was

at that time managing Miss Mitford’s affairs under instructions from

William Harness—that, if the rent could be adjusted to suit Miss

Mitford’s purse, the cottage should be renovated and she stay on.

This was all agreed to, and while the painters and decorators were in

possession, Miss Mitford departed to Bath for a fortnight’s holiday.

Returning somewhat unexpectedly, she found the workmen dawdling and

the maid, who had been left in charge, absent at the theatre, a state

of things which stirred her to great activity and indignation, “and

the scolding which I found it my duty to administer, quite took the

edge off my sadness.”

FOOTNOTES:

[29] Kerenhappuck, her companion.

Mary Russell Mitford · 第 26 / 28 章