The following are the more common digraphs of H:—

=CH=, =GH=, =PH=, =SH=, =TH=,

=BH=, =DH=, =KH=, =LH=, =NH=, =RH=, =ZH=,

=WH=.

The first five are perfect digraphs, a phonic union of parts is

effected, and a new sound produced; thus, neither “hat,” with the sound

of c before it, nor “cat,” with its vowel aspirated, will give the sound

heard in “_ch_at” ∴ C + H is not = CH.

=CH= has three sounds:—_k_, (_ch_aos); _sh_, (ben_ch_); and a third,

compound, tsh (_ch_ur_ch_).

=GH= is a digraph to perpetuate the memory of English orthographical

anomalies.[11] It is used in writing seventy-five words, and in

sixty-three of them its presence is ignored entirely; in nine it is

equivalent to _ff_, and in three it represents a _g_. It signifies

nothing in “hi_gh_,” “Hu_gh_,” &c.; and in “flight,” “night,” &c., it

retains the same signification. In Old Saxon, and in Anglo-Saxon, “high”

was written _hea_, _heag_, _hig_, _heah_, _heh_, _hih_, &c. A spirit of

impartial justice instigated later writers to take in both the _g_ and

the _h_. Professor Meiklejohn (St. Andrews) mentions the opinion held by

some, that the Normans would not pronounce gutturals, and disregarded

the Saxon terminal _h_’s, wherefore the scribes attempted coercion by

strengthening their Aspirates with a _g_. The result must have been a

failure, since both the _h_’s and their g-prefixes became lost to the

pronunciation of most words. The English words in which GH is an initial

digraph are _ghastly_, _ghost_, and _gherkin_; in the two former the H

is altogether adventitious. There exists a proneness to transpose the

_h_ and the _t_ of height, (Saxon, _heath_, _hihth_, &c.), in

consequence of which, and with a superfluous _d_, it becomes “heidth.”

This mispronunciation is recorded by Jones as early as 1701. The

practice will arise from a natural tendency of the mind to bring into

conformity the sounds of words that are associated in their

meanings—leng_th_, dep_th_, bread_th_, wid_th_ _ergo_: “heidth”!

=PH= has the sound of _f_ (s_ph_ere). In Ste_ph_en and ne_ph_ew it

stands for _v_.

=SH= is the French _j_ (_j_oli), unvocalised. The Anglo-Saxons had not

this digraph, but it appeared some centuries after the conquest, which

suggests the possibility of its having been introduced by Norman

influences. Some curious philologist may perhaps undertake to

substantiate or demolish the theory that the Anglo-Saxons learnt to

pronounce SH by attempting to utter the French _j_. Certain it is that

the words _Je me jette à genoux_ would become changed into “Sheh me

shett ah sheenoo” by the average German of to-day. The substitution of

SH for _ss_ in the word _assume_ produces an odd-sounding archaism, yet

one that is occasionally met with in otherwise good speakers. According

to Jones, “a_sh_ume” was correct speech in the seventeenth century.

=TH= of _thin_ and =TH= of _then_ are elementary sounds represented

now-a-days by two letters each. The former is produced by passing

unvocalized breath through a narrow aperture left between the fore-part

of the tongue and the edge of the upper teeth (the central incisors);

the second by the same position of the speech-organs, but with breath

that is vocalized.[12] Common errors are, to confound the TH of _bath_,

_path_, _wreath_, &c., with that of _bathe_, _paths_, _wreathe_, &c. The

former are unvocalized, as in _thin_.

Of the digraphs of the second row little need be said. With one

exception they are rarely used. =BH=, =DH=, =KH=, and =ZH= are English

renderings of the aspirated consonants of Asiatic languages. =LH= is a

legacy from the Anglo-Saxon. =NH= is Portuguese. In =RH= the H is

excessively useless; it is disregarded, and the R remains unchanged.

That man deserved to have his name recorded who first invented the _h_

of “rhyme.” He will have traced a technical connection between _rime_

and “rhythm;” and will have followed the latter to its Greek source

(ῥυθμος). His next act, the insertion of _rime’s_ apparently lost _h_,

will have seemed to him one only of mere reparative justice. His

excellent motives and his perspicacity might have met the admiration of

posterity, had not his etymology been so egregiously faulty, and the

word _rime_, a direct descendant of the Saxon _rim_, and as independent

of a Greek as of a Cherokee origin. But the _h_ he inserted is there

still, and cannot be cast off by any daring iconoclast without an outcry

being raised in its behalf by alarmed traditionists: for our

orthographical creed is derived from our forefathers, impressed with the

accumulated evidences of their quaint blunders, their venerable

ignorance, and admirable errors of judgment, all to be assiduously

copied by each of us their descendants, as an alternative to being

scouted for bad spellers. Thus it is that things originating in a

weakness or perverse use of the reasoning faculties of an ancestor, may

grow to be regarded as a virtue in a descendant.

The letter H, past, present, and future · 第 17 / 23 题