[237] The funeral was fixed for October 10, by a curious coincidence

the anniversary of his first election for Westminster.

[238] The new appointments were, Lord Howick, Secretary of State

for Foreign Affairs; Mr. T. Grenville, Admiralty, in place of Lord

Howick; Mr. Tierney, President of Board of Control, in succession to

Mr. Grenville; Lord Sidmouth, President of the Council, in place of

Lord Fitzwilliam; and Lord Holland, Lord Privy Seal, in place of Lord

Sidmouth.

[239] Lord Holland states fully his reasons for accepting office in

a letter to Lord Lauderdale, dated September 22. It is published in

_Memoirs of the Whig Party_, ii. 53.

[240] Early in March Murat was given the Duchy of Berg and Cleves,

ceded to Napoleon by Bavaria, and other territories claimed by Prussia

were occupied by French troops a month later--this without any

communication to the Prussian Cabinet.

These and other arbitrary actions, following closely on the formation

of the Confederation of the Rhine, opened the eyes of the Prussians

to the true policy of the French Emperor, but the final blow to their

_amour propre_ was the discovery of their Ambassador in France,

Lucchesini, that Napoleon had cheated them over Hanover, by his

willingness to restore it to England, and that he threw no obstacles in

the way of the immediate re-establishment of the Kingdom of Poland.

[241] Prince Louis Ferdinand, nephew of Frederick the Great, was born

in 1772. He served with distinction against Napoleon and was killed at

Saalfeld in 1806 in command of the advance guard.

[242] ‘They want ordnance, and yet would begin by spiking one of their

great guns.’ Lord Holland relates this as another remark of Windham’s

upon the proposal.

[243] Sir Home Popham’s expedition to South America, where he effected

the capture of Buenos Ayres on June 28. He had been originally

despatched to the Cape of Good Hope, where he met with complete success

and annexed that colony to the British Empire. Fired with this triumph

he made his way to the Rio Plate, without any instructions from

Government, who on hearing of his destination took steps to stop him,

but their orders arrived too late. Buenos Ayres remained in his hands

until August 4, when it was retaken by the Spaniards, with severe loss

to the British.

[244] Lord Morpeth was sent to Berlin to offer the assistance of

England conditionally upon the immediate restoration of Hanover. He

arrived at headquarters two days before the battle of Jena, and found

Haugwitz, with whom he was to negotiate, unwilling to meet him in

any way. The intriguing Prussian still hoped to retain Hanover, and

expected after the battle to be able to say so. The result, however,

was contrary to his expectations, and as no diplomatic negotiations

were possible in the confusion after the battle Lord Morpeth returned

to London.

[245] Bartholomew Frere (1778–1851), a younger brother of John Hockham

Frere, and son of John Frere, M.P. for Norwich. He was Secretary of

Legation to his brother in Spain and held various minor diplomatic

posts.

[246] M. Jacobi, the Prussian Minister, had left England when

diplomatic relations between the two countries were broken off in the

spring. He passed Lord Morpeth on the sea, and reached England early in

October.

[247] In the interval which elapsed since Lady Holland’s last entry

in her journal the whole position of Europe had again changed. The

Prussian army, decimated in one day at Jena and Auerstadt, had

practically ceased to exist; Frederick William was a fugitive at the

eastern end of his dominions in Königsberg. Napoleon had occupied

Berlin, and in two months had become master of many of the Prussian

fortresses, which it should have taken him years to reduce. Lucchesini

in the course of his negotiations for peace in Berlin was even ready to

give up those strongholds which had not surrendered, but the patriotic

party were too strong to allow the King to consent to further ignominy.

Russia was prepared to give her assistance, and this nerved Frederick

William to continue the war. Haugwitz resigned, but the King rendered

this lucky event ineffective by also dismissing Count Stein, the only

really able man in his councils.

[248] War was formally declared between Russia and the Porte towards

the end of December.

[249] Gustavus IV. succeeded, at the age of fourteen, to the crown of

Sweden after his father’s assassination in 1792. His hatred of Napoleon

and inclination towards an English alliance were the leading features

of his reign--features to which he so obstinately adhered as to cause

his country much unrest and suffering, and his own downfall. He was

deposed in 1809 in favour of his uncle.

[250] The dissolution took place in October, and the new Parliament met

on December 15. Tierney was defeated at Southwark by Sir Thomas Turton.

He obtained a seat, however, at Athlone.

[251] Sir Samuel Auchmuty (1756–1822), born in New York, of Scotch

descent. He served the crown in America as a volunteer, obtaining

a commission. He went to India, where he saw much service. He took

Monte Video, and showed considerable skill on this expedition

until superseded by General Whitelocke, who arrived with further

reinforcements. He later returned to India, and was also employed in

the East Indian islands.

Sir Home Popham, who was court-martialled in March, and reprimanded for

his share in the unauthorised expedition to Buenos Ayres, remained with

his fleet off the Rio Plate after the loss of the town. The Government

were much disconcerted by the whole affair, but the enthusiasm of the

public forced them to send reinforcements instead of orders of recall.

Three thousand men were despatched with Sir Samuel.

[252] General Robert Craufurd (1764–1812). He served under Lord

Cornwallis in India, and was Quartermaster-General in Ireland during

the insurrection of 1798. His force was joined to General Whitelocke’s.

He commanded a light brigade in the Peninsula and was killed at the

storming of Ciudad Rodrigo. This expedition was intended for the

conquest of Chili, but was diverted to Buenos Ayres.

[253] Aaron Burr’s (1756–1836) conspiracy was a sequel to his defeat

for the Presidency of the United States by Jefferson in 1801. This was

mainly brought about by General Hamilton’s influence, which was again

brought to bear against him in 1804 when he stood for the Governorship

of New York. A duel took place in which General Hamilton was shot

dead. Burr after this went to the West and established himself on the

Mississippi. He gained over General Wilkinson, the commander of the

United States army at New Orleans, to assist him in his schemes, though

nobody appeared to know their exact trend. Jefferson, however, grew

alarmed, Wilkinson recanted, Burr was arrested, and the whole plot

fell to the ground. Burr was acquitted of actual treason, and went to

Europe. There he remained, first in one country, then in another, till

1812, when he returned to America. He took no further active part in

politics, and died in extreme poverty.

[254] Lord Mulgrave was Secretary for Foreign Affairs, 1805–6.

[255] Preparations for this expedition ceased with the fall of the

Ministry. Their successors again took the project into consideration,

but the troops destined to take part in it under Sir Arthur Wellesley

were sent instead to Portugal.

[256] Charles, third Duke of Richmond; born in 1735, died on December

29, 1806. He was succeeded by his nephew, Colonel Lennox.

[257] The charges of immorality raised against the Princess of Wales by

Sir John and Lady Douglas were laid before a Committee of the Cabinet

in 1806 for investigation. It was composed of four members, the Lord

Chancellor, the Lord Chief Justice (Lord Ellenborough), and Lords

Grenville and Spencer, with Sir Samuel Romilly, the Solicitor-General,

as legal adviser. Their report acquitted her of the more serious

charges, but animadverted with severity on the levity of her conduct.

The Princess replied with a letter to the King ‘the joint composition

of Lord Eldon, Mr. Perceval, and Mr. Plomer; the first furnishing the

law, the second the argument, and the third the prolixity. It concluded

with a request to be restored to the comfort and honour of his

Majesty’s royal presence’ (_Memoirs of the Whig Party_, ii. 151).

This the King referred to the Cabinet, and after many deliberations,

with the exception of Mr. Windham, they concurred in the report.

It is curious that Lord Eldon, who it is here suggested was the secret

adviser of George III., was also the confidential adviser of George IV.

at the time of the trial in 1820.

[258] This incident is fully described in _Coke of Norfolk_, ii.

69–73. Mrs. Berney and her friend were in the habit of parading the

town every day in a carriage decked in Colonel Wodehouse’s (the Tory

candidate) colours. One day, however, the Whigs produced a carriage

arranged to closely resemble theirs in every particular, but flaunting

the rival hue. A riot ensued, for which the Berney family held Coke and

Windham responsible, though they had in no way countenanced the trick.

All three candidates were convicted of treating, but as no petition was

brought against Colonel Wodehouse, he retained the seat. Mr. Coke’s

brother, Edward Coke, resigned his seat for Derby, for which the former

was elected; while the latter took the vacant seat at Norwich. Mr.

Windham was returned for Higham Ferrers by Lord Fitzwilliam.

[259] ‘A clear and precise rule was laid down for the regulation of

the circuitous trade by the enemy to the colonies, which defined the

difference between a continuous and intercepted voyage’ (Alison,

_History of Europe_, v. 677). The discussion of the question

of impressment of seamen was postponed till some future occasion,

owing to the difficulties which surrounded it. The British Government

pledged themselves in the meantime to use their powers with the utmost

moderation. President Jefferson, however, refused to ratify the treaty.

[260] At the rupture of the Treaty of Amiens.

[261] Lord Minto had been appointed Governor-General of India. He at

first refused to accept office, and only did so at the earnest desire

of Lord Grenville. That he was loath to do so is shown by letters,

published in vol. iii. of his _Life and Letters_, to Lady Minto,

who on the score of health was precluded from accompanying him. Fox

first offered the appointment to Lord Lauderdale, but the Court of

Directors refused to receive him. He therefore consented to waive his

claim to the dignity.

[262] In answer to Lord Howick Mr. Perceval explained that the word

‘attached’ was taken from a letter of Mr. Fox to Talleyrand published

in the Correspondence, in which he had ‘subscribed himself “with the

most perfect attachment”’ (_Hansard_).

[263] William Roscoe (1753–1831), the author of the _Lives_ of

_Lorenzo de’ Medici_ and _Leo X._ He was elected in the Whig

interest as member for Liverpool in 1806, but was defeated at the

succeeding election.

[264] William Frederick, second Duke of Gloucester (1776–1834), son of

William Henry, Duke of Gloucester, and Maria, Countess of Waldegrave.

He married, in 1816, Princess Mary, George III.’s daughter.

[265] Adolphus Frederick, Duke of Cambridge (1774–1850), seventh son of

George III.

[266] This is probably the paper printed in _Memorials and

Correspondence of C. J. Fox_, ii. 340, &c. It was to be delivered

to the King in 1789, with the memorial, also drawn up by Minto and

Burke, containing a justification of the Prince’s and Duke of York’s

conduct during their father’s illness. Both documents were discussed at

a meeting of the Whig leaders held at Carlton House, and it was decided

not to present the memorial with this paper, but to accompany it only

with a short explanatory letter.

[267] Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland.

When the Grenville Ministry first took office on Mr. Pitt’s death no

stipulation was made to the King regarding the Catholic question. The

Irish Catholics, seeing Ministers in power most of whom they knew to

be favourably inclined to their claims, began at once to agitate for

the removal of disadvantages under which they laboured. The greatest

anomaly was, that by the Act of 1793 Irish Catholics could become

officers in the army there (though still unable to rise to certain

staff appointments), but could not hold that rank in England. A

promise, however, had been made at the time that matters would be

speedily readjusted. This and other points were brought to Mr. Fox’s

notice soon after he had taken office, but he advised a postponement

of the suggested petition to Parliament, as likely for the present to

be of no permanent advantage. He stated, however, that he was quite

willing to risk a dissolution of the Ministry on the question, if they

so wished it. Better counsels prevailed; but after Mr. Fox’s death

the matter again came to the front. Ministers were in a dilemma. On

one side they risked the King’s displeasure, on the other they would

be obliged to proclaim certain parts of Ireland where agitation was

breaking out, on a question with which they themselves sympathised. The

former evil was considered the least, and it was decided by a clause

in the Mutiny Act to allow Irish Catholics and Dissenters to serve in

the English army. To this the King was agreeable; but Ministers desired

to go further. It was found easier to bring forward the matter in the

form of a Bill, and one was drafted which opened the staff appointments

to the Catholics, and also allowed English Dissenters to serve in the

army and navy. Lord Howick thought he had received the King’s consent

to this, but subsequently the latter flatly refused to confirm it. The

Bill was dropped, but the Ministers reserved for themselves the right

to bring forward the question again, should circumstances so demand.

This the King requested them to withdraw; they refused, and were at

once dismissed.

The Correspondence and Minutes of the Cabinet, referred to here and

subsequently, are printed in the Appendix to Lord Holland’s _Memoirs

of the Whig Party_.

[268] Lieut.-General Whitelocke (1757–1833). He distinguished himself

in St. Domingo in 1793–4, but failed signally before Buenos Ayres. In

his attack on the town he showed himself incompetent to deal with an

unexpectedly determined resistance, and agreed to a convention whereby

the English troops were obliged to withdraw. On his return to England

he was tried by court martial and cashiered. Lord Holland states in

the _Memoirs of the Whig Party_ that this appointment was due

to Windham’s dislike of General Whitelocke (who held the post of

Inspector-General) and his desire to appoint someone as his successor

who would be more willing to carry out his schemes.

[269] Elizabeth, Countess of Sutherland in her own right, Lord

Granville Leveson-Gower’s sister-in-law, only daughter of William,

eighteenth Earl of Sutherland. She was born in 1765, and married, in

1785, George Granville, Earl Gower, who succeeded his father as second

Marquess of Stafford in 1803, and was raised to a Dukedom in 1833. The

Duchess died in 1839.

[270] This was in accordance with the resolution which Mr. Rose says

in his Diary he had taken never to say a word or give a vote on the

subject. He disapproved not of the abolition of the Slave Trade itself,

but of the methods pursued in putting it down, which he considered were

unfair to the colonists.

[271] Arthur James, eighth Earl of Fingall (1759–1836), who succeeded

his father in the titles in 1793. He was one of the leaders of the

Catholic movement at this time.

[272] John, second Baron Ponsonby, of Imokilly (1770?–1855), son of

William Brabazon Ponsonby, first Baron Ponsonby, who died in 1806. He

was Ambassador in Constantinople and Vienna and was created a viscount

in 1839. His only sister married Lord Howick.

[273] William Elliot, of Wells, the Chief Secretary. He died in 1818.

[274] William Conyngham Plunket (1764–1854), created Baron Plunket in

1827. He was appointed Attorney-General for Ireland in 1805 by Pitt,

and retained this office under the Whig Government.

[275] Mr. Charles Kendal Bushe.

[276] See _ante_, ii. 174. Mr. Eden was Secretary to the American

Commission and Mr. Allen Assistant-Secretary.

[277] A Committee was appointed on February 10, on the motion of

Mr. Biddulph, member for Denbigh Borough, to examine the efficiency

of regulations and checks, already introduced, to control public

expenditure; to consider what further steps were advisable for the same

object, and to diminish ‘the amount of salaries and emoluments without

detriment to the public service.’

[278] William Garrow (1760–1840), barrister, who sat in several

Parliaments in the Whig interest. He was knighted in 1812; made

Attorney-General in 1813, and Baron of the Exchequer 1817–32.

[279] This was the pamphlet drawn up by Perceval, and known as ‘the

Book.’ It was never given to the world, for just as the Princess’s

friends resolved upon its circulation, the Ministry was dismissed and

the Tories returned to power. A few copies escaped from the printers’

hands, and were bought back for large sums by the Government.

[280] Owing to the infraction of treaty obligations in Moldavia and

Wallachia by Turkey, largely instigated by Sebastiani the French

Ambassador at Constantinople, Russia thought fit to declare war with

the Porte late in 1806. Alexander, however, had need of all his forces

to meet the French in Central Europe, and he suggested to the English

Government that a fleet should be sent to Constantinople to secure

their joint interests, and to demand the dismissal of Sebastiani. This

was done, and Arbuthnot, the British Minister, was ordered to insist

on the latter point, on the pain of instant bombardment. Unfortunately

Arbuthnot had to leave owing to ill health, and Sir Thomas Duckworth,

the British Admiral, allowed himself to be drawn into fruitless

negotiations, and finally withdrew without accomplishing his object.

The force sent to Egypt under General Mackenzie captured Alexandria,

but lost a large number of prisoners in an attack on Rosetta. Nothing

further was effected, and the troops were removed in the autumn.

[281] John Armstrong (1758–1843), American Minister in France and Spain

1804–10.

[282] The Right Hon. Charles Long (1761–1838), afterwards created Lord

Farnborough (1820), Secretary of State for Ireland 1806, and Paymaster

of the Forces for many years.

[283] George Rose (1744–1818), a devoted adherent of Pitt. He was for

many years Secretary of the Treasury, and held various minor offices

under the Tories.

[284] This is amusing and interesting, in light of Lord Malmesbury’s

conversation with Canning, which he quotes in his diary as having taken

place on March 14. Canning ‘said, what he had told me before, that he

had received and rejected overtures from Lord Grenville.... He declared

with a threat that he never would sit in the same Cabinet as Addington.’

[285] Sir William Drummond, born about 1770; died in 1828. He was

appointed Minister at the Court of Naples in 1801, and again in 1806,

and Ambassador to the Porte in 1803.

[286] No action was taken in these matters owing to the fall of the

Ministry, and Canning allowed the question to lapse.

[287] Alexander Hamilton, Marquess of Douglas (1767–1852), British

Ambassador at St. Petersburg. He succeeded his father as tenth Duke of

Hamilton in 1819.

[288] He stated in a letter to Lord Holland, dated April 27, that he

wished to attach himself completely to the Prince.

[289] Right Hon. Charles Bragge, who married Lord Sidmouth’s sister,

and took the additional surname of Bathurst in 1804. He sat in the

House of Commons 1790–1823, and died in 1831.

[290] Philip, third Earl of Hardwicke (1757–1834), son of the

Right Hon. Charles Yorke. He succeeded his uncle in 1790, and was

Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland from 1801 to 1806.

[291] Lord Hardwicke’s half-brother, Charles Philip Yorke (1764–1834).

He was Secretary at War, 1801–3; Home Secretary, 1803–4; and First Lord

of the Admiralty, 1810–11.

[292] March 18.

[293] Charles Manners-Sutton (1755–1828), raised to the See of

Canterbury in 1805, and father of Viscount Canterbury (for many years

Speaker of the House of Commons).

[294] Lord Auckland was President of the Board of Trade. His letter is

printed in _Lord Auckland’s Journal and Correspondence_, iv. 300.

[295] Charles William, Viscount Milton (1786–1857), only son of

William, fourth Earl Fitzwilliam, on whose death in 1833 Lord Milton

succeeded to the titles. He remained member for Yorkshire until 1831.

[296] The figures were: Wilberforce 11,806, Milton 11,177, Lascelles

10,989, the two first being therefore returned. Wilberforce’s

expenses, after many of his supporters had paid their own, amounted

to 28,600_l._, while those of his opponents were reckoned to be

200,000_l._ (_Dictionary of Nat. Biog._).

[297] Mary Elizabeth, born in 1806. She married, in 1830, Thomas

Atherton, third Baron Lilford, and died in 1891.

[298] Peter Leopold Louis Francis Nassau, fifth Earl Cowper

(1778–1837), who succeeded his brother in 1799. He married, in 1805,

Amelia, daughter of Peniston, first Viscount Melbourne. After Lord

Cowper’s death she married Lord Palmerston in 1839.

[299] The Hon. Sir Arthur Paget (1771–1840), second son of Henry, first

Earl of Uxbridge. He held various diplomatic posts, and was appointed,

in 1807, Ambassador to the Porte. He retired from the service two years

later.

[300] David Richard Morier (1784–1877), son of Isaac Morier,

Consul-General of the Levant Company at Constantinople. Commencing at

the age of twenty, he held various diplomatic posts in the East, was

secretary to Lord Castlereagh at Châtillon, &c., and was for many years

Minister at Berne.

[301] Mr. Adam brought a motion in the House of Commons on July 2,

1807, in defence of the warrant for a pension to the Scotch Judge,

Lord Cullen, of 400_l._ a year, with a reversion of 200_l._

for life to his wife. He argued that it was fair, if a judge was not

sufficiently well off to keep up his position. Lord Cullen was devoting

two-thirds of his income to pay his father’s debts.

[302] It was burnt in 1831 by the mob, on account of the opposition of

its owner to the Reform Act.

[303] ‘Conversation’ Sharp.

[304] The _History of Brazil_ was the only part published.

[305] George William, sixth Duke of Argyll (1766–1839), who succeeded

his father in 1806. He married, in 1810, Caroline Elizabeth, daughter

of George, fourth Earl of Jersey, and previously wife of the Earl of

Uxbridge (afterwards Marquess of Anglesey), whom she divorced.

[306] Lord John Russell.

[307] Lewis, describing this visit in a letter to his mother, says,

‘I happened to wake about six o’clock, and hearing the billiard balls

in motion, I put on my dressing-gown and went into the gallery, from

whence looking down into the great hall, I descried Tom Sheridan and

Mr. Chester (who had not been to bed all night) playing with great

eagerness. Fortunately, Tom was in the act of making a stroke on

which the fate of the whole game depended; when I shouted to him over

the balustrade, “Shame! Shame! A married man!” on which he started

back in a fright, missed his stroke, and lost the game’ (_Life and

Correspondence of M. G. Lewis_, ii. 5).

[308] Hon. Henry Edward Fox (1802–59), afterwards fourth Lord Holland;

always a weakly child from birth. He was afflicted with a form of hip

disease, which gave him much trouble all his life.

[309] Lord Holland says in the _Memoirs of the Whig Party_: ‘Mr.

Ponsonby was brought into Parliament at the beginning of the session

for the purpose of assuming an ascendency over a large, intelligent,

and independent body of gentlemen with scarcely twenty of whom he was

personally acquainted. A preposterous scheme!’

[310] William Belsham (1752–1827), author of a series of works, which

he combined to form a _History of Great Britain to the Conclusion of

the Peace of Amiens_.

The journal of Elizabeth Lady Holland (1791-1811) Volume 2 (of 2) · 第 24 / 25 段