IV

But I recouped myself, as they say, by stopping afterwards at

Chichester. In this dense and various old England two places may be

very near together and yet strike a very different note. I knew in

a general way that this one had for its main sign a cathedral, and

indeed had caught the sign, in the form of a beautiful spire, from the

window of the train. I had always regarded an afternoon in a small

cathedral-town as a high order of entertainment, and a morning at

Portsmouth had left me in the mood for not missing such an exhibition.

The spire of Chichester at a little distance greatly resembles that

of Salisbury. It is on a smaller scale, but it tapers upward with

a delicate slimness which, like that of its famous rival, makes a

picture of the level landscape in which it stands. Unlike the spire

of Salisbury, however, it has not at present the charm of antiquity.

A few years ago the old steeple collapsed and tumbled into the church,

and the present structure is but a modern facsimile. The cathedral is

not of the highest interest; it is rather inexpressive, and, except

for a curious old detached bell-tower which stands beside it, has

no particular element of unexpectedness. But an English cathedral of

restricted grandeur may yet be a very charming affair; and I spent an

hour or so circling round this highly respectable edifice, with the

spell of contemplation unbroken by satiety. I approached it, from the

station, by the usual quiet red-brick street of the usual cathedral

town—a street of small, excellent shops, before which, here and there,

one of the vehicles of the neighbouring gentry was drawn up beside

the curbstone while the grocer or the bookseller, who had hurried out

obsequiously, was waiting upon the comfortable occupant. I went into

a bookseller’s to buy a Chichester guide, which I perceived in the

window; I found the shopkeeper talking to a young curate in a soft

hat. The guide seemed very desirable, though it appeared to have been

but scantily desired; it had been published in the year 1841, and a

very large remnant of the edition, with a muslin back and a little

white label and paper-covered boards, was piled up on the counter.

It was dedicated, with terrible humility, to the Duke of Richmond,

and ornamented with primitive woodcuts and steel plates; the ink

had turned brown and the page musty; and the style itself—that of a

provincial antiquary of upwards of forty years ago penetrated with the

grandeur of the aristocracy—had grown rather sallow and stale. Nothing

could have been more mellifluous and urbane than the young curate: he

was arranging to have the “Times” newspaper sent him every morning

for perusal. “So it will be a penny if it is fetched away at noon?”

he said, smiling very sweetly and with the most gentlemanly voice

possible; “and it will be three halfpence if it is fetched away at four

o’clock?” At the top of the street, into which, with my guide-book, I

relapsed, was an old market-cross of the fifteenth century—a florid,

romantic little structure. It consists of a stone pavilion, with open

sides and a number of pinnacles and crockets and buttresses, besides

a goodly medallion of the high-nosed visage of Charles I, which was

placed above one of the arches, at the Restoration, in compensation

for the violent havoc wrought upon the little town by the Parliamentary

soldiers, who had wrested the place from the Royalists and who amused

themselves, in their grim fashion, with infinite hacking and hewing

in the cathedral. Here, to the left, the cathedral discloses itself,

lifting its smart grey steeple out of a pleasant garden. Opposite to

the garden was the Dolphin or the Dragon—in fine the most eligible

inn. I must confess that for a time it divided my attention with the

cathedral, in virtue of an ancient, musty parlour on the second floor,

with hunting-pictures hung above haircloth sofas; of a red-faced

waiter, in evening dress; of a big round of cold beef and a tankard of

ale. The prettiest thing at Chichester is a charming little three-sided

cloister, attached to the cathedral, where, as is usual in such places,

you may sit upon a gravestone amid the deep grass in the middle and

measure the great central mass of the church—the large grey sides, the

high foundations of the spire, the parting of the nave and transept.

From this point the greatness of a cathedral seems more complex and

impressive. You watch the big shadows slowly change their relations;

you listen to the cawing of rooks and the twittering of swallows; you

hear a slow footstep echoing in the cloisters.

[Illustration: CHICHESTER CROSS]

V

If Oxford were not the finest thing in England the case would be

clearer for Cambridge. It was clear enough there, for that matter, to

my imagination, for thirty-six hours. To the barbaric mind, ambitious

of culture, Oxford is the usual image of the happy reconciliation

between research and acceptance. It typifies to an American the union

of science and sense—of aspiration and ease. A German university

gives a greater impression of science and an English country-house

or an Italian villa a greater impression of idle enjoyment; but in

these cases, on one side, knowledge is too rugged, and on the other

satisfaction is too trivial. Oxford lends sweetness to labour and

dignity to leisure. When I say Oxford I mean Cambridge, for a stray

savage is not the least obliged to know the difference, and it suddenly

strikes me as being both very pedantic and very good-natured in him

to pretend to know it. What institution is more majestic than Trinity

College? what can affect more a stray savage than the hospitality

of such an institution? The first quadrangle is of immense extent,

and the buildings that surround it, with their long, rich fronts of

time-deepened grey, are the stateliest in the world. In the centre

of the court are two or three acres of close-shaven lawn, out of the

midst of which rises a grand gothic fountain, where the serving-men

fill up their buckets. There are towers and battlements and statues,

and besides these things there are cloisters and gardens and bridges.

There are charming rooms in a kind of stately gate-tower, and the

rooms, occupying the thickness of the building, have windows looking

out on one side over the magnificent quadrangle, with half a mile or

so of Decorated architecture, and on the other into deep-bosomed trees.

And in the rooms is the best company conceivable—distinguished men who

are thoroughly conversible, intimately affable. I spent a beautiful

Sunday morning walking about the place with one of these gentlemen and

attempting to _débrouiller_ its charms. These are a very complicated

tangle, and I do not pretend, in memory, to keep the colleges apart.

There are none the less half a dozen points that make ineffaceable

pictures. Six or eight of the colleges stand in a row, turning their

backs to the river; and hereupon ensues the loveliest confusion

of gothic windows and ancient trees, of grassy banks and mossy

balustrades, of sun-chequered avenues and groves, of lawns and gardens

and terraces, of single-arched bridges spanning the little stream,

which is small and shallow and looks as if it had been turned on for

ornamental purposes. The thin-flowing Cam appears to exist simply as an

occasion for these brave little bridges—the beautiful covered gallery

of John’s or the slightly collapsing arch of Clare. In the way of

college-courts and quiet scholastic porticoes, of grey-walled gardens

and ivied nooks of study, in all the pictorial accidents of a great

English university, Cambridge is delightfully and inexhaustibly rich.

I looked at these one by one and said to myself always that the last

was the best. If I were called upon, however, to mention the prettiest

corner of the world, I should draw out a thoughtful sigh and point the

way to the garden of Trinity Hall. My companion, who was very competent

to judge (but who spoke indeed with the partiality of a son of the

house), declared, as he ushered me into it, that it was, to his mind,

the most beautiful _small_ garden in Europe. I freely accepted, and

I promptly repeat, an affirmation so magnanimously conditioned. The

little garden at Trinity Hall is narrow and crooked; it leans upon the

river, from which a low parapet, all muffled in ivy, divides it; it has

an ancient wall adorned with a thousand matted creepers on one side,

and on the other a group of extraordinary horse-chestnuts. The trees

are of prodigious size; they occupy half the garden, and are remarkable

for the fact that their giant limbs strike down into the earth, take

root again and emulate, as they rise, the majesty of the parent stem.

The manner in which this magnificent group of horse-chestnuts sprawls

about over the grass, out into the middle of the lawn, is one of the

most heart-shaking features of the garden of Trinity Hall. Of course

the single object at Cambridge that makes the most abiding impression

is the famous chapel of King’s College—the most beautiful chapel in

England. The effect it attempts to produce within is all in the sphere

of the sublime. The attempt succeeds, and the success is attained by a

design so light and elegant that at first it almost defeats itself. The

sublime usually has more of a frown and straddle, and it is not until

after you have looked about you for ten minutes that you perceive the

chapel to be saved from being the prettiest church in England by the

accident of its being one of the noblest. It is a cathedral without

aisles or columns or transepts, but (as a compensation) with such a

beautiful slimness of clustered tracery soaring along the walls and

spreading, bending, and commingling in the roof, that its simplicity

seems only a richness the more. I stood there for a quarter of an hour

on a Sunday morning; there was no service, but in the choir behind the

great screen which divides the chapel in half the young choristers

were rehearsing for the afternoon. The beautiful boy voices rose

together and touched the splendid vault; they hung there, expanding

and resounding, and then, like a rocket that spends itself, they faded

and melted toward the end of the building. It was positively a choir of

angels.

[Illustration: ABBEY GATEWAY, BURY ST. EDMUNDS]

English Hours · 第 51 / 59 题