I shall begin naturally with Mr. LLOYD GEORGE.

There is probably no statesman of whom such widely different estimates

have been formed as the present Prime Minister of Great Britain. I

have heard him compared with THEMISTOCLES, with MACCHIAVELLI, with

MIRABEAU (I think it was MIRABEAU, but it may have been one of those

other people beginning with "M" in French history. Almost everybody in

French history began with an "M," like the things that were drawn by

the three little girls in the well), and even with the younger PITT.

I have heard him spoken of as a charlatan, as a chameleon, as a

chatterbox, and, by a man who had hoped that the KAISER would be

hanged in Piccadilly Circus, as a chouser. Almost all of these

estimates are thoroughly fallacious. Let us take, for instance,

MACCHIAVELLI. It was the declared opinion of MACCHIAVELLI that for the

establishment and maintenance of authority all means may be resorted

to and that the worst and most treacherous acts of the ruler, however

unlawful in themselves, are justified by the wickedness and treachery

of the governed. Has Mr. LLOYD GEORGE ever said this? He may have

thought it, of course, but has he ever said it? No. When one considers

that besides this dictum MACCHIAVELLI wrote seven books on the art

of war, a highly improper comedy, a life of CASTRUCCIO CASTRACANI

(unfinished, and can you wonder?), and was very naturally put to the

torture in 1513, it will be seen how hopelessly the parallel with Mr.

LLOYD GEORGE breaks down.

Let us turn then to the younger PITT. I have read somewhere of the

younger PITT that he cared more for power than for measures, and

was ready to sacrifice great causes with which he had sincerely

sympathised rather than raise an opposition that might imperil his

ascendency. That is just the kind of nasty and long-winded thing that

anybody might say about anybody. It was by disregarding this kind of

criticism that the younger PITT kept on being younger. But apart from

this, does Mr. LLOYD GEORGE quote HORACE in the House? Never, thank

goodness. How many times did WILLIAM PITT cross the English Channel?

Only once in his whole life. That settles it.

The predominant note--I may almost say the keynote--of the PRIME

MINISTER'S character is rather a personal magnetism such as has never

been exercised by any statesman before or after. When he rises to

speak in the House all eyes are riveted on him as though with a

vice until he has finished speaking. Even when he has finished they

sometimes have to be removed by the Serjeant-at-Arms with a chisel.

His speeches have the moral fervour and intensity of one of the Minor

Prophets--NAHUM or AMOS, in the opinion of some critics, though I

personally incline to MALACHI or HABAKKUK. This personal magnetism

which Mr. LLOYD GEORGE radiates in the House he radiates no less in

10, Downing Street, where a special radiatorium has been added to the

breakfast-room to radiate it. Imagine an April morning, a kingfisher

on a woody stream, poplar-leaves in the wind, a shower of sugar shaken

suddenly from a sifter, and you have the man.

It has been said that Mr. LLOYD GEORGE has quarrelled with some of

his nearest friends; but this again is a thing that might happen to

anybody. Mr. LLOYD GEORGE may have had certain slight differences of

opinion with Lord NORTHCLIFFE, but what about HENRY VIII. and WOLSEY?

and HENRY V. and _Falstaff_? and HENRY II. and THOMAS À BECKET?

Talking of THOMAS À BECKET, rather a curious story has been told to

me, which I give for what it is worth. It is stated that some time ago

Mr. LLOYD GEORGE was so enraged by attacks in a certain section of the

Press that he shouted suddenly, after breakfast one morning in Downing

Street, "Will no one rid me of this turbulent scribe?" Whereupon

four knights in his secretarial retinue drew their swords and set out

immediately for Printing House Square. Fortunately there happened to

be a breakdown on the Metropolitan Railway that day, so that nothing

untoward occurred.

I sometimes think that if one can imagine the eloquence of SAVONAROLA

blended with the wiliness of ULYSSES and grafted on to the strength

and firmness of OLIVER CROMWELL, we have the best historical parallel

for Mr. LLOYD GEORGE. It ought to be remembered that the grandfather

of OLIVER CROMWELL came from Wales and that the PROTECTOR is somewhere

described as "Oliver Cromwell _alias_ Williams." Something of that old

power of dispensing with stupid Parliamentary opinion seems to have

descended to our present PRIME MINISTER. There is one difference,

however. OLIVER CROMWELL'S famous advice to his followers was to trust

in Divine Providence "and keep your powder dry." Mr. LLOYD GEORGE puts

his powder in jam.

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 159, November 10, 1920 · 第 9 / 31 题