WEDNESDAY JULY 11. IN CONVENTION.

M^r Randolph's motion requiring the Legisl^{re} to take a periodical

census for the purpose of redressing inequalities in the Representation

was resumed.

M^r Sherman was ag^{st}. Shackling the Legislature too much. We ought to

choose wise & good men, and then confide in them.

M^r Mason. The greater the difficulty we find in fixing a proper rule of

Representation, the more unwilling ought we to be, to throw the task

from ourselves on the Gen^l Legisl^{re}. He did not object to the

conjectural ratio which was to prevail in the outset; but considered a

Revision from time to time according to some permanent & precise

standard as essential to y^e fair representation required in the 1^{st}

branch. According to the present population of America, the North^n part

of it had a right to preponderate, and he could not deny it. But he

wished it not to preponderate hereafter when the reason no longer

continued. From the nature of man we may be sure that those who have

power in their hands will not give it up while they can retain it. On

the contrary we know that they will always when they can rather increase

it. If the S. States therefore should have 3/4 of the people of America

within their limits, the Northern will hold fast the majority of

Representatives. 1/4 will govern the 3/4. The S. States will complain;

but they may complain from generation to generation without redress.

Unless some principle therefore which will do justice to them hereafter

shall be inserted in the Constitution, disagreable as the declaration

was to him, he must declare he could neither vote for the system here,

nor support it, in his State. Strong objections had been drawn from the

danger to the Atlantic interests from new Western States. Ought we to

sacrifice what we know to be right in itself, lest it should prove

favorable to States which are not yet in existence. If the Western

States are to be admitted into the Union, as they arise, they must, he

w^d repeat, be treated as equals, and subjected to no degrading

discriminations. They will have the same pride & other passions which we

have and will either not unite with or will speedily revolt from the

Union, if they are not in all respects placed on an equal footing with

their brethren. It has been said they will be poor, and unable to make

equal contributions to the general Treasury. He did not know but that in

time they would be both more numerous & more wealthy than their Atlantic

brethren. The extent & fertility of their soil, made this probable; and

though Spain might for a time deprive them of the natural outlet for

their productions, yet she will, because she must, finally yield to

their demands. He urged that numbers of inhabitants; though not always a

precise standard of wealth was sufficiently so for every substantial

purpose.

M^r Williamson was for making it a duty of the Legislature to do what

was right & not leaving it at liberty to do or not to do it. He moved

that M^r Randolph's propositions be postpon^d in order to consider the

following "that in order to ascertain the alterations that may happen in

the population & wealth of the several States, a census shall be taken

of the free white inhabitants and 3/5^{ths} of those of other

descriptions on the 1^{st} year after this Government shall have been

adopted and every ---- year thereafter; and that the Representation be

regulated accordingly."

M^r Randolph agreed that M^r Williamson's proposition should stand in

the place of his. He observed that the ratio fixt for the 1^{st} meeting

was a mere conjecture, that it placed the power in the hands of that

part of America, which could not always be entitled to it, that this

power would not be voluntarily renounced; and that it was consequently

the duty of the Convention to secure its renunciation when justice might

so require; by some constitutional provisions. If equality between great

& small States be inadmissible, because in that case unequal numbers of

Constituents w^d be represented by equal number of votes; was it not

equally inadmissible that a larger & more populous district of America

should hereafter have less representation, than a smaller & less

populous district. If a fair representation of the people be not

secured, the injustice of the Gov^t will shake it to its foundations.

What relates to suffrage is justly stated by the celebrated Montesquieu,

as a fundamental article in Republican Gov^t. If the danger suggested by

M^r Gov^r Morris be real, of advantage being taken of the Legislature in

pressing moments, it was an additional reason, for tying their hands in

such a manner that they could not sacrifice their trust to momentary

considerations. Cong^s have pledged the public faith to New States, that

they shall be admitted on equal terms. They never would or ought to

accede on any other. The census must be taken under the direction of the

General Legislature. The States will be too much interested to take an

impartial one for themselves.

M^r Butler & Gen^l Pinkney insisted that blacks be included in the rule

of Representation _equally_ with the whites; and for that purpose moved

that the words "three-fifths" be struck out.

M^r Gerry thought that 3/5 of them was to say the least the full

proportion that could be admitted.

M^r Ghorum. This ratio was fixed by Cong^s as a rule of taxation. Then

it was urged by the Delegates representing the States having slaves that

the blacks were still more inferior to freemen. At present when the

ratio of representation is to be established, we are assured that they

are equal to freemen. The arguments on y^e former occasion convinced him

that 3/5 was pretty near the just proportion and he should vote

according to the same opinion now.

M^r Butler insisted that the labour of a slave in S. Carol^a was as

productive & valuable as that of a freeman in Mass^{ts}, that as wealth

was the great means of defence and utility to the Nation they were

equally valuable to it with freemen; and that consequently an equal

representation ought to be allowed for them in a Government which was

instituted principally for the protection of property, and was itself to

be supported by property.

M^r Mason could not agree to the motion, notwithstanding it was

favorable to Virg^a because he thought it unjust. It was certain that

the slaves were valuable, as they raised the value of land, increased

the exports & imports, and of course the revenue, would supply the means

of feeding & supporting an army, and might in cases of emergency become

themselves soldiers. As in these important respects they were useful to

the Community at large, they ought not to be excluded from the estimate

of Representation. He could not however regard them as equal to freemen

and could not vote for them as such. He added as worthy of remark, that

the Southern States have this peculiar species of property over & above

the other species of property common to all the States.

M^r Williamson reminded M^r Ghorum that if the South^n States contended

for the inferiority of blacks to whites when taxation was in view, the

Eastern States on the same occasion contended for their equality. He did

not however either then or now concur in either extreme, but approved of

the ratio of 3/5.

On M^r Butler's motion for considering blacks as equal to Whites in the

apportionm^t of Representation

Mass^{ts} no. Con^t no. (N. Y. not on floor). N. J. no. P^a no.

Del. ay. M^d no. V^a no. N. C. no. S. C. ay. Geo. ay.

M^r Gov^r Morris said he had several objections to the proposition of

M^r Williamson. 1. It fettered the Legislature too much. 2. it would

exclude some States altogether who would not have a sufficient number to

entitle them to a single Representative. 3. it will not consist with the

Resolution passed on Saturday last authorizing the Legislature to adjust

the Representation from time to time on the principles of population &

wealth or with the principles of equity. If slaves were to be considered

as inhabitants, not as wealth then the s^d Resolution would not be

pursued. If as wealth, then why is no other wealth but slaves included?

These objections may perhaps be removed by amendments. His great

objection was that the number of inhabitants was not a proper standard

of wealth. The amazing difference between the comparative numbers &

wealth of different countries, rendered all reasoning superfluous on the

subject. Numbers might with greater propriety be deemed a measure of

strength, than of wealth, yet the late defence made by G. Britain,

ag^{st} her numerous enemies proved in the clearest manner, that it is

entirely fallacious even in this respect.

M^r King thought there was great force in the objections of M^r Gov^r

Morris: he would however accede to the proposition for the sake of doing

something.

M^r Rutlidge contended for the admission of wealth in the estimate by

which Representation should be regulated. The Western States will not be

able to contribute in proportion to their numbers; they sh^d not

therefore be represented in that proportion. The Atlantic States will

not concur in such a plan. He moved that "at the end of ---- years after

the 1^{st} meeting of the Legislature, and of every ---- years

thereafter, the Legislature shall proportion the Representation

according to the principles of wealth & population."

M^r Sherman thought the number of people alone the best rule for

measuring wealth as well as representation; and that if the Legislature

were to be governed by wealth, they would be obliged to estimate it by

numbers. He was at first for leaving the matter wholly to the discretion

of the Legislature; but he had been convinced by the observation of (M^r

Randolph & M^r Mason), that the _periods_ & the _rule_, of revising the

Representation ought to be fixt by the Constitution.

M^r Reed thought the Legislature ought not to be too much shackled. It

would make the Constitution like Religious Creeds, embarrassing to those

bound to conform to them & more likely to produce dissatisfaction and

scism, than harmony and union.

M^r Mason objected to M^r Rutlidge's motion, as requiring of the

Legislature something too indefinite & impracticable, and leaving them a

pretext for doing nothing.

M^r Wilson had himself no objection to leaving the Legislature entirely

at liberty. But considered wealth as an impracticable rule.

M^r Ghorum. If the Convention who are comparatively so little biassed by

local views are so much perplexed, How can it be expected that the

Legislature hereafter under the full biass of those views, will be able

to settle a standard. He was convinced by the arguments of others & his

own reflections, that the Convention ought to fix some standard or

other.

M^r Gov^r Morris. The arg^{ts} of others & his own reflections had led

him to a very different conclusion. If we can't agree on a rule that

will be just at this time, how can we expect to find one that will be

just in all times to come. Surely those who come after us will judge

better of things present, than we can of things future. He could not

persuade himself that numbers would be a just rule at any time. The

remarks of (M^r Mason) relative to the Western Country had not changed

his opinion on that head. Among other objections it must be apparent

they would not be able to furnish men equally enlightened, to share in

the administration of our common interests. The Busy haunts of men not

the remote wilderness, was the proper school of political Talents. If

the Western people get the power into their hands they will ruin the

Atlantic interests. The Back members are always most averse to the best

measures. He mentioned the case of Pen^a formerly. The lower part of the

State had y^e power in the first instance. They kept it in y^r own hands

& the country was y^e better for it. Another objection with him ag^{st}

admitting the blacks into the census, was that the people of Pen^a would

revolt at the idea of being put on a footing with slaves. They would

reject any plan that was to have such an effect. Two objections had been

raised ag^{st} leaving the adjustment of the Representation from time,

to time, to the discretion of the Legislature. The 1. was, they would be

unwilling to revise it at all. The 2 that by referring to _wealth_ they

would be bound by a rule which if willing, they would be unable to

execute. The 1^{st} obj^n distrusts their fidelity. But if their duty,

their honor & their oaths will not bind them, let us not put into their

hands our liberty, and all our other great interests; let us have no

Gov^t at all. 2. If these ties will bind them, we need not distrust the

practicability of the rule. It was followed in part by the Com^e in the

apportionment of Representatives yesterday reported to the House. The

best course that could be taken would be to leave the interests of the

people to the Representatives of the people.

M^r Madison was not a little surprised to hear this implicit confidence

urged by a member who on all occasions, had inculcated so strongly, the

political depravity of men, and the necessity of checking one vice and

interest by opposing to them another vice & interest. If the

Representatives of the people would be bound by the ties he had

mentioned, what need was there of a Senate? What of a Revisionary power?

But his reasoning was not only inconsistent with his former reasoning,

but with itself. At the same time that he recommended this implicit

confidence to the Southern States in the Northern majority, he was still

more zealous in exhorting all to a jealousy of a Western Majority. To

reconcile the gentl^n with himself, it must be imagined that he

determined the human character by the points of the compass. The truth

was that all men having power ought to be distrusted to a certain

degree. The case of Pen^a had been mentioned where it was admitted that

those who were possessed of the power in the original settlement, never

admitted the new settlem^{ts} to a due share of it. England was a still

more striking example. The power there had long been in the hands of the

boroughs, of the minority; who had opposed & defeated every reform which

had been attempted. Virg^a was in a lesser degree another example. With

regard to the Western States, he was clear & firm in opinion, that no

unfavorable distinctions were admissible either in point of justice or

policy. He thought also that the hope of contributions to the Treas^y

from them had been much underrated. Future contributions it seemed to be

understood on all hands would be principally levied on imports &

exports. The extent and fertility of the Western Soil would for a long

time give to agriculture a preference over manufactures. Trials would be

repeated till some articles could be raised from it that would bear a

transportation to places where they could be exchanged for imported

manufactures. Whenever the Mississippi should be opened to them, which

would of necessity be y^e case as soon as their population would subject

them to any considerable share of the Public burden, imposts on their

trade could be collected with less expence & greater certainty, than on

that of the Atlantic States. In the mean time, as their supplies must

pass through the _Atlantic States_, their contributions would be levied

in the same manner with those of the Atlantic States. He could not agree

that any substantial objection lay ag^{st} fix^g numbers for the

perpetual standard of Representation. It was said that Representation &

taxation were to go together; that taxation and wealth ought to go

together, that population & wealth were not measures of each other. He

admitted that in different climates, under different forms of Gov^t and

in different stages of civilization the inference was perfectly just. He

would admit that in no situation, numbers of inhabitants were an

accurate measure of wealth. He contended however that in the U. States

it was sufficiently so for the object in contemplation. Altho' their

climate varied considerably, yet as the Gov^{ts} the laws, and the

manners of all were nearly the same, and the intercourse between

different parts perfectly free, population, industry, arts, and the

value of labour, would constantly tend to equalize themselves. The value

of labour might be considered as the principal criterion of wealth and

ability to support taxes; and this would find its level in different

places where the intercourse should be easy & free, with as much

certainty as the value of money or any other thing. Wherever labour

would yield most, people would resort, till the competition should

destroy the inequality. Hence it is that the people are constantly

swarming from the more to the less populous places--from Europe to

Am^a--from the North^n & Middle parts of the U. S. to the Southern &

Western. They go where land is cheaper, because there labour is dearer.

If it be true that the same quantity of produce raised on the banks of

the Ohio is of less value, than on the Delaware, it is also true that

the same labor will raise twice or thrice, the quantity in the former,

that it will raise in the latter situation.

Col. Mason. Agreed with M^r Gov^r Morris that we ought to leave the

interests of the people to the Representatives of the people; but the

objection was that the Legislature would cease to be the Representatives

of the people. It would continue so no longer than the States now

containing a majority of the people should retain that majority. As soon

as the Southern & Western population should predominate, which must

happen in a few years, the power w^d be in the hands of the minority,

and would never be yielded to the majority, unless provided for by the

Constitution.

On the Question for postponing M^r Williamson's motion, in order

to consider that of M^r Rutlidge, it passed in the negative,

Mass^{ts} ay. Con^t no. N. J. no. P^a ay. Del. ay. M^d no.

V^a no. N. C. no. S. C. ay. Geo. ay.

On the question on the first clause of M^r Williamson's motion

as to taking a census of the free inhabitants, it passed in the

affirmative; Mass^{ts} ay. Con^t ay. N. J. ay. P^a ay. Del. no.

M^d no. V^a ay. N. C. ay. S. C. no. Geo. no.

the next clause as to 3/5 of the negroes considered.

M^r King being much opposed to fixing numbers as the rule of

representation, was particularly so on account of the blacks. He thought

the admission of them along with Whites at all, would excite great

discontents among the States having no slaves. He had never said as to

any particular point that he would in no event acquiesce in & support

it; but he w^d say that if any in case such a declaration was to be made

by him, it would be in this. He remarked that in the temporary allotment

of Representatives made by the Committee, the Southern States had

received more than the number of their white & Three fifths of their

black inhabitants entitled them to.

M^r Sherman. S. Carol^a had not more beyond her proportion than N. York

& N. Hampshire, nor either of them more than was necessary in order to

avoid fractions or reducing them below their proportions. Georgia had

more; but the rapid growth of that State seemed to justify it. In

general the allotment might not be just, but considering all

circumstances, he was satisfied with it.

M^r Ghorum. supported the propriety of establishing numbers as the rule.

He said that in Mass^{ts} estimates had been taken in the different

towns, and that persons had been curious enough to compare these

estimates with the respective numbers of people; and it had been found

even including Boston, that the most exact proportion prevailed between

numbers & property. He was aware that there might be some weight in what

had fallen from his colleague, as to the umbrage which might be taken by

the people of the Eastern States. But he recollected that when the

proposition of Cong^s for changing the 8^{th} art: of the Confed^n was

before the Legislature of Mass^{ts} the only difficulty then was to

satisfy them that the negroes ought not to have been counted equally

with whites instead of being counted in ratio of three-fifths only.[129]

[129] They were then to have been a rule of taxation only.

Note in Madison's handwriting.

M^r Wilson did not well see on what principle the admission of blacks in

the proportion of three fifths could be explained. Are they admitted as

Citizens? then why are they not admitted on an equality with White

Citizens? are they admitted as property? then why is not other property

admitted into the computation? These were difficulties however which he

thought must be overruled by the necessity of compromise. He had some

apprehensions also from the tendency of the blending of the blacks with

the whites, to give disgust to the people of Pen^a, as had been

intimated by his Colleague (M^r Gov^r Morris). But he differed from him

in thinking numbers of inhab^{ts} so incorrect a measure of wealth. He

had seen the Western settlem^{ts} of P^a and on a comparison of them

with the City of Philad^a could discover little other difference, than

that property was more unequally divided among individuals here than

there. Taking the same number in the aggregate in the two situations he

believed there would be little difference in their wealth and ability to

contribute to the public wants.

M^r Gov^r Morris was compelled to declare himself reduced to the dilemma

of doing injustice to the Southern States or to human nature, and he

must therefore do it to the former. For he could never agree to give

such encouragement to the Slave Trade as would be given by allowing them

a representation for their negroes, and he did not believe those States

would ever confederate on terms that would deprive them of that trade.

On Question for agreeing to include 3/5 of the blacks Mass^{ts}

no. Con^t ay. N. J. no. P^a no. Del. no. M^d[130] no. V^a ay.

N. C. ay. S. C. no. Geo. ay.

[130] (M^r Carrol s^d in explanation of the vote of

M^d that he wished the phraseology to be so altered

as to obviate if possible the danger which had been

expressed of giving umbrage to the Eastern & Middle

States.) Note in Madison's hand.

On the question as to taking census "the first year after the meeting of

the Legislature"

Mass^{ts} ay. Con^t no. N. J. ay. P^a ay. Del. ay. M^d no.

V^a ay. N. C. ay. S. C. ay. Geo. no.

On filling the blank for the periodical census, with 15 years. Agreed to

nem. con.

M^r Madison moved to add, after "15 years," the words "at least" that

the Legislature might anticipate when circumstances were likely to

render a particular year inconvenient.

On this motion for adding "at least," it passed in the negative the

States being equally divided.

Mas. ay. Con^t no. N. J. no. P^a no. Del. no. M^d no. V^a ay.

N. C. ay. S. C. ay. Geo. ay.

A Change of the phraseology of the other clause so as to read, "and the

Legislature shall alter or augment the representation accordingly," was

agreed to nem. con.

On the question on the whole resolution of M^r Williamson as amended,

Mas. no. Con^t no. N. J. no. Del. no. M^d no. V^a no. N. C. no.

S. C. no. Geo. no.

The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 1 · 第 96 / 114 题