THURSDAY JULY 5^{TH} IN CONVENTION

M^r Gerry delivered in from the Committee appointed on Monday last the

following Report.

"The Committee to whom was referred the 8^{th} Resol. of the

Report from the Committee of the Whole House, and so much of the

7^{th} as has not been decided on, submit the following Report:

That the subsequent propositions be recommended to the

Convention on condition that both shall be generally adopted. I.

that in the 1^{st} branch of the Legislature each of the States

now in the Union shall be allowed 1 member for every 40,000

inhabitants of the description reported in the 7^{th} Resolution

of the Com^e of the whole House: that each State not containing

that number shall be allowed 1 member: that all bills for

raising or appropriating money, and for fixing the salaries of

the officers of the Govern^t of the U. States shall originate in

the 1^{st} branch of the Legislature, and shall not be altered

or amended by the 2^d branch; and that no money shall be drawn

from the public Treasury but in pursuance of appropriations to

be originated in the 1^{st} branch. "II. That in the 2^d branch

each State shall have an equal vote."[125]

[125] This report was founded on a motion in the

Co[~m]itte made by D^r Franklin. It was barely

acquiesced in by the members from the States opposed

to an equity of votes in the 2^d branch and was

evidently considered by the members on the other

side, as a gaining of their point. A motion was made

by M^r Sherman. He acted in the place of M^r

Elseworth who was kept away by indisposition, in the

Committee to the following effect "that each State

should have an equal vote in the 2^d branch;

provided that no decision therein should prevail

unless the majority of States concurring should also

comprise a majority of the inhabitants of the U.

States." This motion was not much deliberated on nor

approved in the Committee. A similar proviso had

been proposed in the debates on the articles of

Confederation in 1777, to the articles giving

certain powers to "nine States." See Journals of

Cong^s for 1777, p. 462.--Madison Note.

M^r Ghoram observed that as the report consisted of propositions

mutually conditional he wished to hear some explanations touching the

grounds on which the conditions were estimated.

M^r Gerry. The Committee were of different opinions as well as the

Deputations from which the Com^e were taken, and agreed to the Report

merely in order that some ground of accommodation might be proposed.

Those opposed to the equality of votes have only assented conditionally;

and if the other side do not generally agree will not be under any

obligation to support the Report.

Mr. Wilson thought the Committee had exceeded their powers.

M^r Martin was for taking the question on the whole report.

M^r Wilson was for a division of the question; otherwise it w^d be a

leap in the dark.

M^r Madison could not regard the privilege of originating money bills as

any concession on the side of the small States. Experience proved that

it had no effect. If seven States in the upper branch wished a bill to

be originated, they might surely find some member from some of the same

States in the lower branch who would originate it. The restriction as to

amendments was of as little consequence. Amendments could be handed

privately by the Senate to members in the other house. Bills could be

negatived that they might be sent up in the desired shape. If the Senate

should yield to the obstinacy of the 1^{st} branch the use of that body

as a check would be lost. If the 1^{st} branch should yield to that of

the Senate, the privilege would be nugatory. Experience had also shewn

both in G. B. and the States having a similar regulation that it was a

source of frequent & obstinate altercations. These considerations had

produced a rejection of a like motion on a former occasion when judged

by its own merits. It could not therefore be deemed any concession on

the present, and left in force all the objections which had prevailed

ag^{st} allowing each State an equal voice. He conceived that the

Convention was reduced to the alternative of either departing from

justice in order to conciliate the smaller States, and the minority of

the people of the U. S. or of displeasing these by justly gratifying the

larger States and the majority of the people. He could not himself

hesitate as to the option he ought to make. The Convention with justice

& the majority of the people on their side, had nothing to fear. With

injustice and the minority on their side they had every thing to fear.

It was in vain to purchase concord in the Convention on terms which

would perpetuate discord among their Constituents. The Convention ought

to pursue a plan which would bear the test of examination, which would

be espoused & supported by the enlightened and impartial part of

America, & which they could themselves vindicate and urge. It should be

considered that altho' at first many may judge of the system

reco[~m]ended, by their opinion of the Convention, yet finally all will

judge of the Convention by the System. The merits of the System alone

can finally & effectually obtain the public suffrage. He was not

apprehensive that the people of the small States would obstinately

refuse to accede to a Gov^t founded on just principles, and promising

them substantial protection. He could not suspect that Delaware would

brave the consequences of seeking her fortunes apart from the other

States, rather than submit to such a Gov^t; much less could he suspect

that she would pursue the rash policy of courting foreign support, which

the warmth of one of her representatives (M^r Bedford) had suggested, or

if she sh^d, that any foreign nation w^d be so rash as to hearken to the

overture. As little could he suspect that the people of N. Jersey

notwithstanding the decided tone of the gentlemen from that State, would

choose rather to stand on their own legs, and bid defiance to events,

than to acquiesce under an establishment founded on principles the

justice of which they could not dispute, and absolutely necessary to

redeem them from the exactions levied on them by the co[~m]erce of the

neighbouring States. A review of other States would prove that there was

as little reason to apprehend an inflexible opposition elsewhere.

Harmony in the Convention was no doubt much to be desired. Satisfaction

to all the States, in the first instance still more so. But if the

principal States comprehending a majority of the people of the U. S.

should concur in a just & judicious plan, he had the firmest hopes, that

all the other States would by degrees accede to it.[126]

[126] Yates, and his colleague, Lansing, left the Convention

July 5, despairing of the result of its labors being

satisfactory to them. Madison's speech is the last one

reported by Yates.--Yates, _Secret Proceedings_, etc.

M^r Butler said he could not let down his idea of the people, of America

so far as to believe they would from mere respect to the Convention

adopt a plan evidently unjust. He did not consider the privilege

concerning money bills as of any consequence. He urged that the 2^d

branch ought to represent the States according to their property.

M^r Gov^r Morris, thought the form as well as the matter of the Report

objectionable. It seemed in the first place to render amendments

impracticable. In the next place, it seemed to involve a pledge to agree

to the 2^d part if the 1^{st} sh^d be agreed to. He conceived the whole

aspect of it to be wrong. He came here as a Representative of America;

he flattered himself he came here in some degree as a Representative of

the whole human race; for the whole human race will be affected by the

proceedings of this Convention. He wished gentlemen to extend their

views beyond the present moment of time; beyond the narrow limits of

place from which they derive their political origin. If he were to

believe some things which he had heard, he should suppose that we were

assembled to truck and bargain for our particular States. He can not

descend to think that any gentlemen are really actuated by these views.

We must look forward to the effects of what we do. These alone ought to

guide us. Much has been said of the sentiments of the people. They were

unknown. They could not be known. All that we can infer is that if the

plan we recommend be reasonable & right; all Who have reasonable minds

and sound intentions will embrace it, notwithstanding what had been said

by some gentlemen. Let us suppose that the larger States shall agree;

and that the smaller refuse; and let us trace the consequences. The

opponents of the system in the smaller States will no doubt make a

party, and a noise for a time, but the ties of interest, of kindred & of

common habits which connect them with other States will be too strong to

be easily broken. In N. Jersey particularly he was sure a great many

would follow the sentiments of Pen^a & N. York. This Country must be

united. If persuasion does not unite it, the sword will. He begged that

this consideration might have its due weight. The scenes of horror

attending Civil commotion cannot be described, and the conclusion of

them will be worse than the term of their continuance. The stronger

party will then make traytors of the weaker; and the Gallows & Halter

will finish the work of the sword. How far foreign powers would be ready

to take part in the confusions he would not say. Threats that they will

be invited have it seems been thrown out. He drew the melancholy picture

of foreign intrusions as exhibited in the History of Germany, & urged it

as a standing lesson to other nations. He trusted that the Gentlemen who

may have hazarded such expressions, did not entertain them till they

reached their own lips. But returning to the Report he could not think

it in any respect calculated for the Public good. As the 2^d branch is

now constituted, there will be constant disputes & appeals to the States

which will undermine the Gen^l Government & controul & annihilate the

1^{st} branch. Suppose that the delegates from Mass^{ts} & Rho I. in the

Upper House disagree, and that the former are outvoted. What Results?

they will immediately declare that their State will not abide by the

decision, and make such representations as will produce that effect. The

same may happen as to Virg^a & other States. Of what avail then will be

what is on paper. State attachments, and State importance have been the

bane of this Country. We cannot annihilate; but we may perhaps take out

the teeth of the serpents. He wished our ideas to be enlarged to the

true interest of man, instead of being circumscribed within the narrow

compass of a particular Spot. And after all how little can be the motive

yielded by selfishness for such a policy. Who can say whether he

himself, much less whether his children, will the next year be an

inhabitant of this or that State.

M^r Bedford. He found that what he had said as to the small States being

taken by the hand, had been misunderstood; and he rose to explain. He

did not mean that the small States would court the aid & interposition

of foreign powers. He meant that they would not consider the federal

compact as dissolved untill it should be so by the Acts of the large

States. In this case The consequences of the breach of faith on their

part, and the readiness of the small States to fulfill their

engagements, would be that foreign Nations having demands on this

Country would find it their interest to take the small States by the

hand, in order to do themselves justice. This was what he meant. But no

man can foresee to what extremities the small States may be driven by

oppression. He observed also in apology that some allowance ought to be

made for the habits of his profession in which warmth was natural &

sometimes necessary. But is there not an apology in what was said by

(M^r Gov^r Morris) that the sword is to unite: by M^r Ghorum that

Delaware must be annexed to Penn^a and N. Jersey divided between Pen^a

and N. York. To hear such language without emotion, would be to renounce

the feelings of a man and the duty of a Citizen--As to the propositions

of the Committee, the lesser States have thought it necessary to have a

security somewhere. This has been thought necessary for the Executive

Magistrate of the proposed Gov^t who has a sort of negative on the laws;

and is it not of more importance that the States should be protected,

than that the Executive branch of the Gov^t sh^d be protected. In order

to obtain this, the smaller States have conceded as to the constitution

of the first branch, and as to money bills. If they be not gratified by

correspondent concessions as to the 2^d branch is it to be supposed they

will ever accede to the plan; and what will be the consequence if

nothing should be done? The condition of the U. States requires that

something should be immediately done. It will be better that a defective

plan should be adopted, than that none should be recommended. He saw no

reason why defects might not be supplied with meetings 10, 15, or 20

years hence.

M^r Elseworth said he had not attended the proceedings of the Committee,

but was ready to accede to the compromise they had reported. Some

compromise was necessary; and he saw none more convenient or reasonable.

M^r Williamson hoped that the expressions of individuals would not be

taken for the sense of their colleagues, much less of their States which

was not & could not be known. He hoped also that the meaning of those

expressions would not be misconstrued or exaggerated. He did not

conceive that (M^r Gov^r Morris) meant that the sword ought to be drawn

ag^{st} the smaller States. He only pointed out the probable

consequences of anarchy in the U. S. A similar exposition ought to be

given of the expressions of (M^r Ghorum). He was ready to hear the

Report discussed; but thought the propositions contained in it, the most

objectionable of any he had yet heard.

M^r Patterson said that he had when the Report was agreed to in the

Com^e reserved to himself the right of freely discussing it. He

acknowledged that the warmth complained of was improper; but he thought

the Sword & the Gallows little calculated to produce conviction. He

complained of the manner in which M^r M and M^r Gov^r Morris had treated

the small States.

M^r Gerry. Tho' he had assented to the Report in the Committee, he had

very material objections to it. We were however in a peculiar situation.

We were neither the same Nation nor different Nations. We ought not

therefore to pursue the one or the other of these ideas too closely. If

no compromise should take place what will be the consequence. A

secession he foresaw would take place; for some gentlemen seem decided

on it: two different plans will be proposed; and the result no man could

foresee. If we do not come to some agreement among ourselves some

foreign sword will probably do the work for us.

M^r Mason. The Report was meant not as specific propositions to be

adopted; but merely as a general ground of accommodation. There must be

some accommodation on this point, or we shall make little further

progress in the work. Accommodation was the object of the House in the

appointment of the Committee; and of the Committee in the Report they

had made. And however liable the Report might be to objections, he

thought it preferable to an appeal to the world by the different sides,

as had been talked of by some Gentlemen. It could not be more

inconvenient to any gentleman to remain absent from his private affairs,

than it was for him; but he would bury his bones in this City rather

than expose his Country to the Consequences of a dissolution of the

Convention without any thing being done.

The 1^{st} proposition in the report for fixing the representation in

the 1^{st} branch, "one member for every 40,000 inhabitants," being

taken up.

M^r Gov^r Morris objected to that scale of apportionment. He thought

property ought to be taken into the estimate as well as the number of

inhabitants. Life & liberty were generally said to be of more value than

property. An accurate view of the matter would nevertheless prove that

property was the main object of Society. The Savage State was more

favorable to liberty than the Civilized; and sufficiently so to life. It

was preferred by all men who had not acquired a taste for property; it

was only renounced for the sake of property which could only be secured

by the restraints of regular Government. These ideas might appear to

some new, but they were nevertheless just. If property then was the main

object of Gov^t certainly it ought to be one measure of the influence

due to those who were to be affected by the Govern^t. He looked forward

also to that range of New States which w^d soon be formed in the West.

He thought the rule of representation ought to be so fixed as to secure

to the Atlantic States a prevalence in the National Councils. The new

States will know less of the public interest than these, will have an

interest in many respects different, in particular will be little

scrupulous of involving the Community in wars the burdens & operations

of which would fall chiefly on the maritime States. Provision ought

therefore to be made to prevent the maritime States from being hereafter

outvoted by them. He thought this might be easily done by irrevocably

fixing the number of representatives which the Atlantic States should

respectively have, and the number which each new State will have. This

w^d not be unjust, as the Western settlers w^d previously know the

conditions on which they were to possess their lands. It would be

politic as it would reco[~m]end the plan to the present as well as

future interest of the States which must decide the fate of it.

M^r Rutlidge. The gentleman last up had spoken some of his sentiments

precisely. Property was certainly the principal object of Society. If

numbers should be made the rule of representation, the Atlantic States

will be subjected to the Western. He moved that the first proposition in

the report be postponed in order to take up the following viz "that the

suffrages of the several States be regulated and proportioned according

to the sums to be paid towards the general revenue by the inhabitants of

each State respectively: that an apportionment of suffrages, according

to the ratio aforesaid shall be made and regulated at the end of ----

years from the 1^{st} meeting of the Legislature of the U. S., and at

the end of every ---- years but that for the present, and until the

period above mentioned, the suffrages shall be for N. Hampshire ---- for

Massach^{ts} ---- &c.

Col. Mason said the case of new States was not unnoticed in the

Committee; but it was thought and he was himself decidedly of opinion

that if they made a part of the Union, they ought to be subject to no

unfavorable discriminations. Obvious considerations required it.

M^r Randolph concurred with Col. Mason.

On Question on M^r Rutlidges motion,

Mas^{ts} no. Con^t no. N. Y. no. N. J. no. P^a no. Del. no.

Mary^d no. V^a no. N. C. no. S. C. ay. Geo. not on floor.

The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 1 · 第 84 / 114 题