On the question for y^e election of the 1^{st} branch by the _people_"

Mass^{ts} ay. Con^t ay. N. Y. ay. N. J. no. P^a ay. Del. ay.

M^d div^d. V^a ay. N. C. ay. S. C. ay. Geo. ay.

Election of the 1^{st} branch "for the term of three years," considered.

M^r Randolph moved to strike out, "three years" and insert "two

years"--he was sensible that annual elections were a source of great

mischiefs in the States, yet it was the want of such checks ag^{st} the

popular intemperence as were now proposed, that rendered them so

mischievous. He would have preferred annual to biennial, but for the

extent of the U. S. and the inconveniency which would result from them

to the representatives of the extreme parts of the Empire. The people

were attached to frequency of elections. All the Constitutions of the

States except that of S. Carolina, had established annual elections.

M^r Dickinson. The idea of annual elections was borrowed from the

antient Usage of England, a country much less extensive than ours. He

supposed biennial would be inconvenient. He preferred triennial, and in

order to prevent the inconveniency of an entire change of the whole

number at the same moment, suggested a rotation, by an annual election

of one third.

M^r Elseworth was opposed to three years, supposing that even one year

was preferable to two years. The people were fond of frequent elections

and might be safely indulged in one branch of the Legislature. He moved

for 1 year.

M^r Strong[97] seconded & supported the motion.

[97] "M^r Strong is a Lawyer of some eminence,--he has

received a liberal education, and has good connections to

recommend him. As a speaker he is feeble, and without

confidence. This Gent^n is about thirty five years of age,

and greatly in the esteem of his Colleagues."--Pierce's

Notes, _Amer. Hist. Rev._ iii., 326.

M^r Wilson being for making the 1^{st} branch an effectual

representation of the people at large, preferred an annual election of

it. This frequency was most familiar & pleasing to the people. It would

not be more inconvenient to them, than triennial elections, as the

people in all the States have annual meetings with which the election of

the National representatives might be made to co-incide. He did not

conceive that it would be necessary for the Nat^l Leigsl: to sit

constantly; perhaps not half--perhaps not one fourth of the year.

M^r Madison was persuaded that annual elections would be extremely

inconvenient and apprehensive that biennial would be too much so; he did

not mean inconvenient to the electors; but to the representatives. They

would have to travel seven or eight hundred miles from the distant parts

of the Union; and would probably not be allowed even a reimbursement of

their expences. Besides, none of those who wished to be re-elected would

remain at the seat of Governm^t; confiding that their absence would not

affect them. The members of Cong^s had done this with few instances of

disappointment. But as the choice was here to be made by the people

themselves who would be much less complaisant to individuals, and much

more susceptible of impressions from the presence of a Rival candidate,

it must be supposed that the members from the most distant States would

travel backwards & forwards at least as often as the elections should be

repeated. Much was to be said also on the time requisite for new Members

who would always form a large proportion, to acquire that knowledge of

the affairs of the States in general without which their trust could not

be usefully discharged.

M^r Sherman preferred annual elections, but would be content with

biennial. He thought the Representatives ought to return home and mix

with the people. By remaining at the seat of Gov^t they would acquire

the habits of the place which might differ from those of their

Constituents.

Col. Mason observed that the States being differently situated such a

rule ought to be formed as would put them as nearly as possible on a

level. If elections were annual the middle States would have a great

advantage over the extreme ones. He wished them to be biennial; and the

rather as in that case they would coincide with the periodical elections

of S. Carolina as well of the other States.

Col. Hamilton urged the necessity of 3 years, there ought to be neither

too much nor too little dependence, on the popular sentiments. The

checks in the other branches of the Govern^t would be but feeble, and

would need every auxiliary principle that could be interwoven. The

British House of Commons were elected septennially, yet the democratic

spirit of y^e Constitution had not ceased. Frequency of elections tended

to make the people listless to them; and to facilitate the success of

little cabals. This evil was complained of in all the States. In Virg^a

it had been lately found necessary to force the attendance & voting of

the people by severe regulations.

The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which Framed the Constitution of the United States, May-September 1787. Volume 1 · 第 64 / 114 题