SIR EDWARD GREY'S VIEW

Sir Edward Grey considered that the British proposals were sufficient.

He explained that, if Germany desired to crush France, England might

not be able to sit still, though, if France were aggressive or attacked

Germany, no support would be given by his Majesty's Government or

approved by England. It is obvious that the real object of the German

proposal was to obtain the neutrality of England in all eventualities,

since, should a war break out, Germany would certainly contend that it

had been forced upon her, and would claim that England should remain

neutral. An admirable example of this is the present war, in which,

in spite of the facts, Germany contends that war has been forced upon

her. Even the third member of the Triple Alliance, who had sources of

information not open to us, did not share this view, but regarded it as

an aggressive war.

Sir Edward Grey eventually proposed the following formula:

The two powers being mutually desirous of securing peace and

friendship between them, England declares that she will neither

make nor join in any unprovoked attack upon Germany. Aggression

upon Germany is not the subject, and forms no part of, any treaty,

understanding, or combination to which England is now a party, nor

will she become a party to anything that has such an object.

Sir Edward Grey when he handed this formula to Count Metternich said

that the use of the word "neutrality" would convey the impression that

more was meant than was warranted by the text; he suggested that the

substance of what was required would be obtained and more accurately

expressed by the words "will neither make nor join in any unprovoked

attack."

Count Metternich thereupon received instructions to make it quite

clear that the Chancellor could recommend the Emperor to give up the

essential parts of the Novelle (the bill then pending for the increase

of the German Navy) only if we could conclude an agreement guaranteeing

neutrality of a far-reaching character and leaving no doubt as to any

interpretation. He admitted that the Chancellor's wish amounted to

a guarantee of absolute neutrality, failing which the Novelle must

proceed.

Count Metternich stated that there was no chance of the withdrawal

of the Novelle, but said that it might be modified; it would be

disappointing to the Chancellor if we did not go beyond the formula we

had suggested.

Sir Edward Grey said that he could understand that there would be

disappointment if his Majesty's Government were to state that the

carrying out of the Novelle would put an end to the negotiations and

form an insurmountable obstacle to better relations. His Majesty's

Government did not say this, and it hoped that the formula which it

had suggested might be considered in connection with the discussion

of territorial arrangements, even if it did not prove effective in

preventing the increase of naval expenditure.

Sir Edward Grey added that if some arrangement could be made between

the two Governments it would have a favorable though indirect effect

upon naval expenditure as time went on; it would have, moreover, a

favorable and direct effect upon public opinion in both countries.

A few days afterward Count Metternich communicated to Sir Edward Grey

the substance of a letter from the Chancellor, in which the latter said

that, as the formula suggested by his Majesty's Government was from

the German point of view insufficient, and as his Majesty's Government

could not agree to the larger formula for which he had asked, the

Novelle must proceed on the lines on which it had been presented to the

Federal Council. The negotiations then came to an end, and with them

the hope of a mutual reduction in the expenditure on armaments of the

two countries.

* * * * *

New York Times Current History: The European War, Vol. 8, Pt. 2, No. 1, July 1918 · 第 335 / 346 题