Germany and Great Britain in 1912

Lord Haldane's Official Report of

His Conciliatory Mission Prior to the War

_Lord Haldane, the British Minister for War in 1912, was sent on a

mission to Berlin in that year to confer with the German Chancellor,

Dr. von Bethmann Hollweg, in the hope of reaching some agreement with

Germany for a mutual reduction of armament, and for the establishment

of conditions that would preserve European peace. The hope regarding

armaments was not fulfilled, and the conversations that had taken place

were not made public by either Government; but late in May, 1918,

in view of the revelations of Prince Lichnowsky regarding Germany's

responsibility for the war, the British Government at length published

Lord Haldane's report. It is in the form of a daily record, beginning

Feb. 8, 1912, and is here reproduced in full, with the exception of

parts relating solely to British defensive measures:_

"At the interview with the Chancellor, which took place at 2 o'clock

and lasted for more than an hour and a half, I began by giving him

the message of good wishes for the conversations and for the future

of Anglo-German relations with which the King had intrusted me at the

audience I had before leaving. He was pleased with this message, and

intimated that he would write through the German Ambassador to thank

the King. I then said that perhaps it would be convenient if I defined

the capacity in which I was in Berlin, and there to talk to him; and

I defined it as above intimated. I proceeded to ask whether he wished

to make any observations or desired that I should begin. He wished

me to begin, and I went on at once to speak to him as arranged in a

conversation I had had with Sir Edward Grey before leaving London."

"I told him that I felt there had been a great deal of drifting away

between Germany and England, and that it was important to ask what was

the cause. To ascertain this, events of recent history had to be taken

into account. Germany had built up, and was building up, magnificent

armaments, and with the aid of the Triple Alliance she had become the

centre of a tremendous group. The natural consequence was that other

powers had tended to approximate. I was not questioning for a moment

Germany's policy, but this was the natural and inevitable consequence

in the interests of security. We used to have much the same situation

with France when she was very powerful on the sea that we had with

Germany now. While the fact to which I referred created a difficulty,

the difficulty was not insuperable; for two groups of powers might be

on very friendly relations if there was only an increasing sense of

mutual understanding and confidence. The present seemed to me to be a

favorable moment for a new departure. The Morocco question was now out

of the way, and we had no agreements with France or Russia except those

that were in writing and published to the world.

"The Chancellor interrupted me, and asked me whether this was really

so. I replied that I could give him the assurance that it was so

without reserve, and that in the situation, which now existed I saw no

reason why it should not be possible for us to enter into a new and

cordial friendship, carrying the two old ones into it, perhaps, to the

profit of Russia and France as well as Germany herself. He replied that

he had no reason to differ from this view."

"In connection with my remarks as to the events of last Summer, he

interposed that we had military preparations. I replied that no

preparations had been made which were other than those required to

bring the capacity of the British Army in point of mobilization to

something approaching the standard which Germany had long ago reached,

and which was with her a matter of routine. For this purpose we had

studied our deficiencies and modes of operation * * * We could not be

caught unprepared."

New York Times Current History: The European War, Vol. 8, Pt. 2, No. 1, July 1918 · 第 328 / 346 题