SECT. VI.

XLIII. I have observed, that for the sincere conversion or turning

of mens hearts, benignity and gentle treatment has done miracles, in

cases where rigour has been found ineffectual. Two illustrious examples

of this sort, which in different ages have been exhibited on the

theatre of France, occur to me at present. The first is that of Peter

Abelard, a most subtle logician, and famous broacher of heresies in

the twelfth century. The adventures of this man were extraordinary,

and he for the most part experienced adverse fortune. He suffered

many persecutions, some of which were unjust ones; but neither the

just nor the unjust were capable of subduing his mind, or mitigating

the contentious vivacity of his spirit. His errors, after innumerable

debates, were condemned by the council of Sens, at which St. Bernard

assisted. He appealed from the sentence to Pope innocent the Second,

who confirmed the decision of the council; and added to it, that his

books should be burnt, and the author imprisoned for life. Abelard had

an infinite number of enemies, many of whom were not so from their

zeal to religion, but from many other very different motives. As an

augmentation of his misfortunes, there was scarce any one who did not

exclaim against him, and cry aloud for the execution of the sentence.

In this deplorable situation of Abelard, there was only one man who

had generosity enough to take the favourable side of the question,

and interest himself on his behalf. This was that most pious and wise

person St. Peter the Venerable, abbot of the great monastery of Cluny,

who solicited and obtained of the Pope, Abelard’s pardon. He also

reconciled him with St. Bernard, which amounted to the same thing as

indemnifying him against the public hatred. Besides this, as a remedy

for all his reverses of fortune, he offered him an asylum in his

monastery of Cluny, which monastery received him in its arms like a

loving father, and gave him the habit of a monk.

It will be proper to observe here, that Eloisa, a sensible, beautiful,

and noble French lady, was in her youth in love with, and beloved by

Abelard, to such an excess, that their love broke through all the

fences of honour. Historians relate a very singular circumstance of

this woman, which is, that Abelard being desirous of marrying her,

she, notwithstanding her prodigious fondness for him, rejected the

proposal, and chose rather to continue his concubine than be his wife,

alledging as her motive for this conduct, that she would not, by

her marriage, deprive the church of the great lustre that might be

reflected on it by the sublime genius of Abelard, although in the end,

she, by the importunities and threats of her friends and relations,

was prevailed on to espouse him. She afterwards took the veil, and

became an exemplary religious. She always maintained a very tender and

affectionate correspondence with Abelard, but at the same time in very

chaste terms, and such as were conformable to the rules of virtue and

decorum. As soon as she was informed of Abelard’s death, she begged of

St. Peter the Venerable, that he would let her have his body, that she

might bury it in the convent where she was prelate; and the pious abbot

granted her request. It appears by the epistles of Abelard, that Eloisa

was universally beloved and respected for her virtue and discretion. He

says, the bishops loved her as a daughter, the abbesses as a sister,

and the seculars a mother.

The effect which this generous benignity of St. Peter the Venerable

had upon Abelard, was admirable. He not only became a monk, but a most

exemplary one, and a shining pattern of all kinds of virtues, of which

St. Peter the Venerable gives irrefragable testimony in his letter to

Eloisa on the occasion of his death, which letter is filled with the

highest eulogiums on the virtues of Abelard. He says in one part of

it, that he does not remember to have seen a man so humble as him; and

in another, that it was matter of admiration, to observe a person so

famous and of so great a name, have so lowly an opinion of himself.

In another, he says, his understanding, his tongue, and his works,

were always employed on celestial objects. And in another, he compares

him to the great Gregory in the following words: _Nec (sicut de magno

Gregorio legitur) momentum aliquod præterire sinebat, quin semper aut

oraret, aut legeret, aut scriberet, aut dictaret_. These eulogiums are

confirmed, and if possible exceeded, in the Chronicle of the Monastery

of Cluny, which says, that, from the time of his taking the habit of a

monk, his thoughts, words, and actions, were always divine: _Et deinde

mens ejus, lingua ejus, opus ejus, semper divina fuere_.

XLIV. So that this man, who could not be made to bend to the most

learned men of France, who were engaged in continual controversies

with him; nor to the force of the civil power, exerted against him

various times at the instance of his enemies; nor to the ecclesiastical

prelates, nor to the authority of a council, nor to the zeal and

learning of a St. Bernard: This man, I say, on whom all these

exertions had no influence, submitted to the gentle, compassionate,

and benevolent spirit of St. Peter the Venerable. The estimation and

tenderness, with which this saint always regarded Abelard after his

conversion, was very great, as is evident from two epitaphs he wrote to

grace his tomb. I shall insert a part of each of them here, by which

may be seen the high opinion he entertained of the learning and wisdom

of this eminent man.

First Epitaph.

_Gallorum Socrates, Plato maximus Hesperiarum,_

_Noster Aristoteles, Logicis, quicumque fuerunt,_

_Aut par, aut melior, studiorum cognitus orbi_

_Princeps, ingenio varius, subtilis, & acer._

Second Epitaph.

_Petrus in hac petra latitat, quem mundus Homerum_

_Clamabat, sed jam sidera sidus habent._

_Sol erat hic Gallis, sed eum jam fata tulerunt:_

_Ergo caret Regio Gallica sole sua._

_Ille sciens quidquid fuit ulli scibile, vicit_

_Artifices, artes absque docente docens._

XLV. The second example, which is still more striking and illustrious

than the first, is that of the Huguenots in the reign of Charles the

ninth, in the diocese of Lisieux in Normandy. The learned Dominican

John Henuyer, who had been confessor to Henry the second, was bishop

of that diocese, when orders came from the king to the governor of

Normandy, to put to the sword all the Huguenots of that province. The

venerable prelate opposed the execution of the order as far as it

related to his own diocese efficaciously, by declaring that he would

sooner submit his own throat to the knife, than consent to the death

of those heretics, whom he had always considered as sheep of his

flock, although they had gone astray; and used such other arguments,

as prevailed on the governor to suspend the execution of the orders;

and the king, moved with the firmness and zeal of the pious bishop,

revoked the decree with respect to the Huguenots of that bishopric. The

hand of Omnipotence heaped blessings on the paternal affection which

bishop Henuyer manifested to his flock, and on the pious exertion he

made to save their lives at all events; and (O wonderful to relate!)

in none of the other parts of France, where rivers of Huguenot blood

had been spilt in the execution of the king’s orders, was the heresy

extinguished; but on the diocese of Lisieux only, did God confer this

great blessing. The experience of the paternal bowels and feeling of

their prelate for them, made such an impression on the hearts of the

Huguenots of that district, that they all, without a single exception,

became converts to the catholic faith. Thus does benignity triumph

over the most stubborn hearts, when managed and conducted with a pious

zeal and consummate prudence.

Essays, or discourses, vol. 1 (of 4) · 第 101 / 107 题