I have said enough, however, to show that this earthwork, so much

neglected and so little known, is really a most important structure;

that it has made East London possible, and London itself healthy, while

it has converted miles and miles of barren swamp into smiling meadows

and fertile farms.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

V

THE FACTORY GIRL

------------------------------------------------------------------------

V

THE FACTORY GIRL

EAST LONDON—one cannot repeat it too often—is a city of working bees. As

we linger and loiter among the streets multitudinous, we hear, as from a

hive, the low, contented murmur of continuous and patient work. There

are two millions of working-people in this city. The children work at

school; the girls and boys, and the men and women, work in factory, in

shop, and at home, in dock and in wharf and in warehouse; all day long

and all the year round, these millions work. They are clerks,

accountants, managers, foremen, engineers, stokers, porters, stevedores,

dockers, smiths, craftsmen of all kinds. They are girls who make things,

girls who sew things, girls who sell things. There are among them many

poor, driven, sweated creatures, and the sweaters themselves are poor,

driven, sweated creatures, for sweating once begun is handed on from one

to the other as carefully and as religiously as any holy lamp of

learning. They work from early morning till welcome evening. The music

of this murmur, rightly understood, is like the soft and distant singing

of a hymn of praise. For the curse of labor has been misunderstood;

without work man would be even as the beasts of the field. It is the

necessity of work that makes him human; of necessity he devises and

discovers and invents, because he would die if he did not work; and

because he has to subdue the animal within him. The animal is solitary;

the man must be gregarious. He must make a friend of his brother, he

must obey the stronger, he must make laws, he must fight with nature,

and compel her to give up her secrets. It is only by means of work that

man can rise; it is his ladder; in the sweat of his face he eats his

bread—yea, the bread of life. It is not with any pity that we should

listen to this murmur. It should be with pure contentment and gratitude,

for the murmur, though it speaks partly of the whirr of ten thousand

wheels and partly of those who stand and serve those wheels, speaks also

of this blessed quality of work, that it enables men to use the body for

the sake of the soul. Man must work.

Imagine, if you can, what would follow if you held up your hand and

said: “Listen, all. There will be no more work. You may stop the

engines, or they may run down of their own accord. You may take off your

aprons and wash your hands. You may all sit down for the rest of your

lives. Your food will be waiting for you when you want it. Eat, drink,

and be happy if you can.” If they can! But can they, with nothing to

do—no work to do, only, like the sheep in the field, to browse, or, like

the wolves of the forest, to rend and tear and slay?

If you can use your eyes as well as your ears, look about you. It is

really like looking at a hive of bees, is it not? There are thousands of

them, and they are all alike; they are all doing the same thing; they

are all living the same lives; they wake and work and rest and sleep,

and so life passes by. If you look more closely you will observe

differences. No two human creatures, to begin with, are alike in face.

More closely still, and you will discover that in the greatest crowd,

where the people are, like sheep in a fold, huddled together, every one

is as much for himself—there is as much individuality here—as in the

places where every one stands by himself and has room to move in and a

choice to make.

[Illustration: Wade Street, Limehouse.]

Let us take a single creature out of these millions. Perhaps if we learn

how one lives, how one regards the world, we may understand, in some

degree, this agitated, confused, restless, incoherent, inarticulate

mass.

I introduce you to a baby. Her name is Liz. She has as yet but a few

days of life behind her. She is hardly conscious of hunger, cold, or

uneasiness, or any of the things with which life first makes its

beginning apparent to the half-awakened brain. She opens eyes that

understand nothing—neither form, nor distance, nor color, nor any

differences; she sees men, like trees, walking. When she is hungry she

wails; when she is not hungry she sleeps. We will leave the child with

her mother, and we will stand aside and watch while the springs and

summers pass, and while she grows from an infant to a child, a girl, a

woman.

The room where the baby lies is a first-floor front, in a house of four

rooms and a ruinous garret, belonging to a street which is occupied,

like all the streets in this quarter, wholly by the people of the lower

working-class. This is London Street, Ratcliffe. It is a real street,

with a real name, and it is in a way typical of East London of the lower

kind. The aristocracy of labor, the foremen and engineers of shipyards

and works, live about Stepney Church, half a mile to the north. Their

streets are well kept, their doorsteps are white, their windows are

clean, there are things displayed in the front windows of their houses.

Here you will see a big Bible, here a rosewood desk, here a vase full of

artificial flowers, here a bird-cage with foreign birds,—Avvadavats,

Bengalees, love-birds, or a canary,—here a glass case containing coral

or “Venus’s fingers” from the Philippines, here something from India

carved in fragrant wood, here a piece of brasswork from Benares. There

is always something to show the position and superiority of the tenant.

It is the distinctive mark of the lower grades of labor that they have

none of these ornaments. Indeed, if by any chance such possessions fell

in their way they would next week be in the custody of the pawnbroker;

they would “go in.”

We are, then, in a first-floor front. Look out of the window upon the

street below: meanwhile the baby grows. The street contains forty

houses. Each house has four rooms, two or three have six; most of the

people have two rooms. There are, therefore, roughly speaking, about one

hundred families residing in this street. The door-steps, the pavement,

and the roadway are swarming with children; the street is their only

playground. Here the little girl of six bears about in her arms,

staggering under the weight, but a careful nurse, her little sister,

aged twelve months; here the children take their breakfast and their

dinner; here they run and play in summer and in winter. It seems to be

never too hot or too cold for them. They are ragged, they are

bareheaded, they are barefooted and barelegged, their toys are bits of

wood and bones and oyster-shells, transformed by the imagination of

childhood into heaven knows what of things precious and splendid. Of

what they have not they know nothing; but, then, they mind nothing,

therefore pity would be thrown away upon them. It is the only world they

know; they are happy in their ignorance; they are feeling the first joy

of life. By their ruddy faces and sturdy limbs you can see that the air

they breathe is wholesome, and that they have enough to eat.

The room is furnished sufficiently, according to the standards of the

family. There is a table, with two chairs; there is a chest of drawers

with large glass handles. On this chest stands a structure of artificial

flowers under a glass shade. This is the sacred symbol of

respectability. It is for the tenement what the Bible or the coral in

the window is for the house. So long as we have our glass shade with its

flowers we are in steady work, and beyond the reach of want. On each

side of the glass shade are arranged the cups and saucers, plates and

drinking-glasses, belonging to the family. There are also exhibited with

pride all the bottles of medicine recently taken by the various members.

It is a strange pride, but one has observed it among people of a more

exalted station. There are also set out with the bottles certain

heart-shaped velvet pincushions, made by the sailors, and considered as

decorations of the highest æsthetic value. The chest of drawers is used

for the clothes of the family—the slender supplement of what is on the

family back. It is also the storehouse for everything that belongs to

the daily life. There is a cupboard beside the chimney, with two

shelves. Any food that may be left over, and the small supplies of tea

and sugar, are placed on the upper shelf, coals on the lower. On the

table stands, always ready, a teapot, and beside it a half-cut loaf and

a plate with margarine, the substitute for butter. Margarine is not an

unwholesome compound. It is perhaps better than bad butter; it is made

of beef fat, clarified and colored to resemble butter. I am told that

other people eat it in comfortable assurance that it is butter.

When the child grows old enough to observe things she will remark, from

time to time, the absence of the chest of drawers. At other times she

will discover that the drawers are empty. These vacuities she will

presently connect with times of tightness. When money is scarce and work

is not to be got things “go in” of their own accord; the pawnbroker

receives them.

She will learn more than this; she will learn the great virtue of the

poor, the virtue that redeems so many bad habits—generosity. For the

chest of drawers and the best clothes are more often “in” to oblige a

neighbor in difficulties than to relieve their own embarrassments. The

people of Ratcliffe are all neighbors and all friends; to be sure, they

are frequently enemies, otherwise life would be monotonous. Always some

one is in trouble, always some of the children are hungry, always there

is rent to pay, always there is some one out of work. Liz will learn

that if one can help, one must. She will learn this law without any

formula or written code, not out of books, not in church, not in school;

she will learn it from the daily life around her. Generosity will become

part of her very nature.

You will perceive, however, that this child is not born of the very

poor; her parents are not in destitution; her father is, in fact, a

docker, and, being a big, burly fellow, born and brought up in the

country, he gets tolerably regular employment and very fair wages. If he

would spend less than the third or the half of his wages in drink his

wife might have a four-roomed cottage. But we must take him as he is.

His children suffer no serious privation. They are clothed and fed; they

have the chance of living respectably, and with such decencies as belong

to their ideals and their standards. In a word, Liz will be quite a

commonplace, average girl of the lower working-class.

The first duty of a mother is to “harden” the baby. With this view, Liz

was fed, while still a tiny infant, on rusks soaked in warm water, and

when she was a year old her mother began to give her scraps of

beefsteak, slightly fried, to suck; she also administered fish fried in

oil—the incense and fragrance of this delicacy fills the whole

neighborhood, and hangs about the streets day and night like a cloud.

For drink she gave the baby the water in which whiting had been boiled;

this is considered a sovereign specific for building up a child’s

constitution. Sometimes, it is true, the treatment leads to unforeseen

results. Another child, for instance, about the same age as Liz, and

belonging to the same street, was fed by its mother on red herring, and,

oddly enough, refused to get any nourishment out of that delightful form

of food. They carried it to the Children’s Hospital, where the doctor

said it was being starved to death, and made the most unkind remarks

about the mother—most unjust as well, for the poor woman had no other

thought or intention than to “harden the inside” of her child, and all

the friends and neighbors were called in to prove that plenty of herring

had been administered.

As soon as Liz was three years of age she had the same food as her

parents and elder sisters. You shall dine with the family presently. For

breakfast and tea and supper, and for any occasional “bever” or snack,

she had a slice of bread and margarine, which she cut for herself when,

like Mrs. Gamp, so disposed. It was indeed terrifying to see the small

child wielding a bread-knife nearly as big as herself. She got plenty of

pennies when work was regular; nobody is so generous with his pennies as

the man who needs them most. She spent these casual windfalls in sweets

and apples, passing the latter round among her friends for friendly

bites, and dividing the former in equal portions. This cheap

confectionery for the children of the kerb and the door-step supplies

the place of sweet puddings, for the mystery of the pudding is

unfortunately little known or understood by the mothers of Ratcliffe.

In the matter of beer, Liz became very early in life acquainted with its

taste. There is a kind of cheap porter, sold at three farthings a pint,

considered grateful and comforting by the feminine mind of Ratcliffe.

What more natural than that the child should be invited to finish what

her mother has left of the pint? It would not be much. What more

motherly, when one is taking a little refreshment in a public house,

than to give a taste to the children playing on the pavement outside?

And what more natural than for the children to look for these windfalls,

and to gather round the public house expectant? It seems rough on the

little ones to begin so early; it is contrary to modern use and custom,

but we need not suppose that much harm is done to a child by giving it

beer occasionally. Formerly all children had beer for breakfast, beer

for dinner, and beer for supper. In Belgium very little children have

their bock for dinner. The mischief in the case of our Liz and her

friends was that she got into the habit of looking for drink more

stimulating than tea, and that the habit remained with her and grew with

her.

At three years of age Liz passed, so to speak, out of the nursery, which

was the door-step and the kerb, into the school-room. She was sent to

the nearest Board-school, where she remained under instruction for

eleven long years. She began by learning certain highly important

lessons; first, that she had to obey; next, that she had to be quiet;

and, thirdly, that she had to be clean. As regards the first and second,

obedience and order were not enforced in the nursery of London Street.

They were, it is true, sometimes enjoined with accompaniment of a cuff

and a slap, not unkindly meant, in the home. As for cleanliness, one

wash a week, namely, on Sunday morning, had hitherto been considered

sufficient. It was, however, a thorough wash. The unkempt locks, brown

with the dust and grime of a week’s street play, came out of the tub a

lovely mass of light-brown, silky curls; the child’s fair skin emerged

from its coating of mud; her rosy cheeks showed their natural color; her

round, white arms fairly shone and glowed in the sunshine. On Sunday

morning Liz presented the appearance of a very pretty child, clean and

fair and winsome. As soon as she went to school, however, she had to

undergo the same process every morning except Saturday. If she appeared

in school unwashed she had to go home again; not only that, but there

was often unpleasantness in the matter of pinafore. Saturday is a school

holiday, therefore no one washes on Saturday, and face and hands and

pinafore may all go grimy together.

[Illustration: In an East-End Gin-Shop.]

Liz remained at school from three to fourteen years of age. What she

learned I do not exactly know. Some years ago I looked through some

“readers” for Board-schools, and came to the conclusion that nothing at

all could be learned from them, counting scraps as worth nothing. But I

hear that they have altered their “readers.” Still, if you remember that

no one has any books at all in London Street, that even a halfpenny

paper is not often seen there, that no talk goes on which can instruct a

child in anything, you will own that a child may be at school even for

eleven years and yet learn very little. And since she found no means of

carrying on her education after she left school, no free libraries, no

encouragement from her companions, you will not be surprised to hear

that all she had learned from books presently dropped from her like a

cloak or wrapper for which she had no further use. Let us be reasonable.

The Board-school taught her, besides a certain small amount of temporary

and short-lived book-lore, some kind of elementary manners—a respect, at

least, for manners; the knowledge of what manners may mean. The clergy

and the machinery of the parish cannot teach these things. It can be

done only at the Board-school. It is the school, and not the church,

which softens manners and banishes some of the old brutality, because,

you see, they do not go to church, and they must go to school. How

rough, how rude, the average girl of Ratcliffe was before the

Board-schools were opened, Liz herself neither knows nor comprehends.

These schools have caused the disappearance of old characteristics once

thought to be ingrained habits. Their civilizing influence during the

last thirty years has been enormous. They have not only added millions

to the numbers of those who read a great deal and perhaps—but this is

doubtful—think a little, but they have abolished much of the old

savagery. I declare that the life of this street as it was thirty or

forty years ago simply could not be written down with any approach to

truth in these pages.

Let me only quote the words of Professor Huxley, who began life by

practising as a medical man in this quarter. “I have seen the Polynesian

savage,” I once heard him say in a speech, “in his primitive condition,

before the missionary or the blackbirder or the beach-comber got at him.

With all his savagery, he was not half so savage, so unclean, so

irreclaimable, as the tenant of a tenement in an East London slum.”

These words open the door to unbounded flights of imagination. Leave

that vanished world, leave the savage slum of Huxley’s early manhood, to

the region of poetry and fancy, to the unwritten, to the suggested, to

the half-whispered. It exists no longer; it has been improved.

Liz passed through school, then, from one standard to the next. We have

seen that she learned manners, order, obedience, and the duty of cleanly

clothes and cleanly language. She learned also to love teacher and

school. Teacher came to see her when she was ill, and brought her nice

things. Teacher kissed her. There were others, however, who took a mean

advantage of her affectionate nature, and used it as a means of keeping

her out of mischief—ladies who went in and out of the streets and

houses, not afraid of anything; who gathered the children together on

Sundays, and sang with them and talked to them, and gave them oranges.

These ladies knew all the children. When they walked down the streets

the very little ones ran after them, clinging to their skirts, catching

at their hands, in the hope of a word and a kiss. Liz, among the rest,

was easily softened by kindness. She had two schools,—that provided by

the country and that provided by these ladies, who taught her more than

books can teach,—and both schools, if you please, were provided for

nothing. Whatever may happen to Liz in after life, her respect for

manners and for the life of order will remain. And sometimes, when

things look very black and there is real cause for sadness and

repentance, this respect may be the poor girl’s most valuable asset.

At the age of fourteen, when she had to leave school, she was a sturdy,

well-built girl, square-shouldered, rather short, but of a better frame

than most of her companions, because her father was country-born; her

features were sharp, her face was plain, but not unpleasing; her gray

eyes were quick and restless, her lips were mobile; her cheek was

somewhat pale, but not worn and sunken. She looked abounding in life and

health; she was full of fun, and quick to laugh on the smallest

provocation; she was ready-witted and prompt with repartee and retort;

she danced as she went along the street, because she could not walk

sedately; if a barrel-organ came that way she danced in the road,

knowing half a dozen really pretty steps and figures. She had something

in her quick movements, in the restlessness of her eyes, in the

half-suspicious turn of the head, of the street sparrow, the only bird

which she knew. If you grow up among street sparrows there is every

reason for the adoption of some of their manners; the same resemblance

to the sparrow, which is an impudent, saucy bird, always hungry, always

on the lookout for something more, may be observed in other street

children. She was affectionate with her companions, but always watchful

for her own chance.

In her views of the conduct of life she was no strict moralist. She was

ready to condone some things which more rigid maidens condemn. She would

not, for instance, bear malice because her brother, for one of the

smaller crimes, such as gambling on the pavement, got into trouble; nor

would she judge him harshly if he was found in the possession of things

“picked up”—unconsidered trifles; nor would she resent being knocked

down by her brother when in drink. She had too often seen her mother

cuffed by her father when he came home drunk to feel any resentment

about such a trifle. In sober moments her brother did not use his fist

upon her, nor did her father, except under the provocation of drink,

drive the whole family flying into the street by “taking the strap” to

everybody.

What did she know about the outer world? From her books and her school

little enough. Her own country, like every other country, was to her a

geographical expression. Even of London she knew nothing, though from

the river stairs and foreshore she could see a good deal of it. Once a

year, however, she had been taken for a day in the country, either by

train to the nearest seaside place, or by brakes and wagonettes to

Epping Forest. She was therefore by no means ignorant of green fields.

Why, there was the “Island Garden,” in the Isle of Dogs, close at hand.

But of trees and flowers and birds individually she knew nothing, and

she never would know anything. A bird was a bird, a tree was a tree to

her. On the whole of nature her mind was a blank. About her own country,

its history, its position, its achievements, she had learned something,

but it was rapidly becoming a vague and dim memory; of literature she

knew nothing. She had learned a little singing, and had an ear for

melody. She never read either newspapers or books, not even penny

story-books, therefore she added nothing to her scanty knowledge.

East London · 第 6 / 20 段