CHAPTER CLXX.

THIRTIETH CONGRESS: FIRST SESSION: LIST OF MEMBERS: PRESIDENT'S

MESSAGE.

_Senate._

MAINE.--Hannibal Hamlin, J. W. Bradbury.

NEW HAMPSHIRE.--Charles G. Atherton, John P. Hale.

VERMONT.--William Upham, Samuel S. Phelps.

MASSACHUSETTS.--Daniel Webster, John Davis.

RHODE ISLAND.--Albert C. Greene, John H. Clarke.

CONNECTICUT.--John M. Niles, Roger S. Baldwin.

NEW YORK.--John A. Dix, Daniel S. Dickinson.

NEW JERSEY.--William L. Dayton, Jacob W. Miller.

PENNSYLVANIA.--Simon Cameron, Daniel Sturgeon.

DELAWARE.--John M. Clayton, Presley Spruance.

MARYLAND.--James A. Pearce, Reverdy Johnson.

VIRGINIA.--James M. Mason, R. M. T. Hunter.

NORTH CAROLINA.--George. E. Badger, Willie P. Mangum.

SOUTH CAROLINA.--A. P. Butler, John C. Calhoun.

GEORGIA.--Herschell V. Johnson, John M. Berrien.

ALABAMA.--William R. King, Arthur P. Bagley.

MISSISSIPPI.--Jefferson Davis, Henry Stuart Foote.

LOUISIANA.--Henry Johnson, S. U. Downs.

TENNESSEE.--Hopkins L. Turney, John Bell.

KENTUCKY.--Thomas Metcalfe, Joseph R. Underwood.

OHIO.--William Allen, Thomas Corwin.

INDIANA.--Edward A. Hannegan, Jesse D. Bright.

ILLINOIS.--Sidney Breese, Stephen A. Douglass.

MISSOURI.--David R. Atchison, Thomas H. Benton.

ARKANSAS.--Solon Borland, William K. Sebastian.

MICHIGAN.--Thomas Fitzgerald, Alpheus Felch.

FLORIDA.--J. D. Westcott, Jr., David Yulee.

TEXAS.--Thomas J. Rusk, Samuel Houston.

IOWA.--Augustus C. Dodge, George W. Jones.

WISCONSIN.--Henry Dodge, I. P. Walker.

_House of Representatives._

MAINE.--David Hammonds, Asa W. H. Clapp, Hiram Belcher, Franklin

Clark, E. K. Smart, James S. Wiley, Hezekiah Williams.

NEW HAMPSHIRE.--Amos Tuck, Charles H. Peaslee, James Wilson, James

H. Johnson.

MASSACHUSETTS.--Rob't C. Winthrop, Daniel P. King, Amos Abbott, John

G. Palfrey, Chas. Hudson, George Ashmun, Julius Rockwell, Horace

Mann, Artemas Hale, Joseph Grinnell.

RHODE ISLAND.--R. B. Cranston, B. B. Thurston.

CONNECTICUT.--James Dixon, S. D. Hilliard, J. A. Rockwell, Truman

Smith.

VERMONT.--William Henry, Jacob Collamer, George P. Marsh, Lucius B.

Peck.

NEW YORK.--Frederick W. Lloyd, H. C. Murphy, Henry Nicoll, W. B.

Maclay, Horace Greeley, William Nelson, Cornelius Warren, Daniel B.

St. John, Eliakim Sherrill, P. H. Sylvester, Gideon Reynolds, J.

I. Slingerland, Orlando Kellogg, S. Lawrence, Hugh White, George

Petrie, Joseph Mullin, William Collins, Timothy Jenkins, G. A.

Starkweather, Ausburn Birdsall, William Duer, Daniel Gott, Harmon S.

Conger, William T. Lawrence, Ebon Blackman, Elias B. Holmes, Robert

L. Rose, David Ramsay, Dudly Marvin, Nathan K. Hall, Harvey Putnam,

Washington Hunt.

NEW JERSEY.--James G. Hampton, William A. Newell, Joseph Edsall, J.

Van Dyke, D. S. Gregory.

PENNSYLVANIA.--Lewis C. Levin, J. R. Ingersoll, Charles Brown, C. J.

Ingersoll, John Freedly, Samuel A. Bridges, A. R. McIlvaine, John

Strohm, William Strong, R. Brodhead, Chester Butler, David Wilmot,

James Pollock, George N. Eckert, Henry Nes, Jasper E. Brady, John

Blanchard, Andrew Stewart, Job Mann, John Dickey, Moses Hampton, J.

W. Farrelly, James Thompson, Alexander Irvine.

DELAWARE.--John W. Houston.

MARYLAND.--J. G. Chapman, J. Dixon Roman, T. Watkins Ligon, R. M.

McLane, Alexander Evans, John W. Crisfield.

VIRGINIA.--Archibald Atkinson, Richard K. Meade, Thomas S. Flournoy,

Thomas S. Bocock, William L. Goggin, John M. Botts, Thomas H. Bayly,

R. T. L. Beale, J. S. Pendleton, Henry Bedinger, James McDowell,

William B. Preston, Andrew S. Fulton, R. A. Thompson, William G.

Brown.

NORTH CAROLINA.--Thomas S. Clingman, Nathaniel Boyden, D. M.

Berringer, Aug. H. Shepherd, Abm. W. Venable, James J. McKay, J. R.

J. Daniel, Richard S. Donnell, David Outlaw.

SOUTH CAROLINA.--Daniel Wallace, Richard F. Simpson, J. A. Woodward,

Artemas Burt, Isaac E. Holmes, R. Barnwell Rhett.

GEORGIA.--T. Butler King, Alfred Iverson, John W. Jones, H. A.

Harralson, J. A. Lumpkin, Howell Cobb, A. H. Stephens, Robert

Toombs.

ALABAMA.--John Gayle, H. W. Hilliard, S. W. Harris, William M. Inge,

G. S. Houston, W. R. W. Cobb, F. W. Bowdon.

MISSISSIPPI.--Jacob Thompson, W. S. Featherston, Patrick W.

Tompkins, Albert G. Brown.

LOUISIANA.--Emile La Sere, B. G. Thibodeaux, J. M. Harmansan, Isaac

E. Morse.

FLORIDA.--Edward C. Cabell.

OHIO.--James J. Faran, David Fisher, Robert C. Schenck, Richard

S. Canby, William Sawyer, R. Dickinson, Jonathan D. Morris, J. L.

Taylor, T. O. Edwards, Daniel Duncan, John K. Miller, Samuel F.

Vinton, Thomas Richey, Nathan Evans, William Kennon, Jr., J. D.

Cummins, George Fries, Samuel Lahm, John Crowell, J. R. Giddings,

Joseph M. Root.

INDIANA.--Elisha Embree, Thomas J. Henley, J. L. Robinson, Caleb B.

Smith, William W. Wick, George G. Dunn, R. W. Thompson, John Pettit,

C. W. Cathcart, William Rockhill.

MICHIGAN.--R. McClelland, Cha's E. Stewart, Kinsley S. Bingham.

ILLINOIS.--Robert Smith, J. A. McClernand, O. B. Ficklin, John

Wentworth, W. A. Richardson, Thomas J. Turner, A. Lincoln.

IOWA.--William Thompson, Shepherd Leffler.

KENTUCKY.--Linn Boyd, Samuel O. Peyton, B. L. Clark, Aylett Buckner,

J. B. Thompson, Green Adams, Garnett Duncan, Charles S. Morehead,

Richard French, John P. Gaines.

TENNESSEE.--Andrew Johnson, William M. Cocke, John H. Crozier, H.

L. W. Hill, George W. Jones, James H. Thomas, Meredith P. Gentry,

Washington Barrow, Lucien B. Chase, Frederick P. Stanton, William T.

Haskell.

MISSOURI.--James B. Bowlin, John Jamieson, James S. Green, Willard

P. Hall, John S. Phelps.

ARKANSAS.--Robert W. Johnson.

TEXAS.--David S. Kaufman, Timothy Pillsbury.

WISCONSIN.--Mason C. Darling, William Pitt Lynde.

Robert C. Winthrop, Esq., of Massachusetts, was elected Speaker of

the House, and Benjamin B. French, Esq., clerk, and soon after the

President's message was delivered, a quorum of the Senate having

appeared the first day. The election of Speaker had decided the

question of the political character of the House, and showed the

administration to be in a minority:--a bad omen for the popularity

of the Mexican war. The President had gratifying events to

communicate to Congress--the victories of Cerro Gordo, Contreras

and Churubusco, the storming of Chepultepec, and the capture of the

City of Mexico: and exulted over these exploits with the pride of

an American, although all these advantages had to be gained over the

man whom he handed back into Mexico under the belief that he was to

make peace. He also informed Congress that a commissioner had been

sent to the head-quarters of the American army to take advantage

of events to treat for peace; and that he had carried out with him

the draught of the treaty, already prepared, which contained the

terms on which alone the war was to be terminated. This commissioner

was Nicholas P. Trist, Esq., principal clerk in the Department

of State, a man of mind and integrity, well acquainted with the

state of parties in Mexico, subject to none at home, and anxious

to establish peace between the countries. Upon the capture of the

city, and the downfall of Santa Anna, commissioners were appointed

to meet Mr. Trist; but the Mexican government, far from accepting

the treaty as drawn up and sent to them, submitted other terms still

more objectionable to us than ours to them; and the two parties

remained without prospect of agreement. The American commissioner

was recalled, "_under the belief_," said the message, "_that his

continued presence with the army could do no good_." This recall was

despatched from the United States the 6th of October, immediately

after information had been received of the failure of the attempted

negotiations; but, as will be seen hereafter, the notice of the

recall arriving when negotiations had been resumed with good

prospect of success, Mr. Trist remained at his post to finish his

work.

In the course of the summer a "_female_," fresh from Mexico,

and with a masculine stomach for war and politics, arrived at

Washington, had interviews with members of the administration, and

infected some of them with the contagion of a large project--nothing

less than the absorption into our Union of all Mexico, and the

assumption of all her debts (many tens of millions _in esse_, and

more _in posse_), and all to be assumed at par, though the best were

at 25 cents in the dollar, and the mass ranging down to five cents.

This project was given out, and greatly applauded in some of the

administration papers--condemned by the public feeling, and greatly

denounced in a large opposition meeting in Lexington, Kentucky, at

which Mr. Clay came forth from his retirement to speak wisely and

patriotically against it. The "_female_" had gone back to Mexico,

with high letters from some members of the cabinet to the commanding

general, and to the plenipotentiary negotiator; both of whom,

however, eschewed the proffered aid. A party in Mexico developed

itself for this total absorption, and total assumption of debts, and

the scheme acquired so much notoriety, and gained such consistency

of detail, and stuck so close to some members of the administration,

that the President deemed it necessary to clear himself from the

suspicion; which he did in a decisive paragraph of his message:

"It has never been contemplated by me, as an object of the

war, to make a permanent conquest of the republic of Mexico,

or to annihilate her separate existence as an independent

nation. On the contrary, it has ever been my desire that she

should maintain her nationality, and, under a good government

adapted to her condition, be a free, independent, and prosperous

republic. The United States were the first among the nations

to recognize her independence, and have always desired to be

on terms of amity and good neighborhood with her. This she

would not suffer. By her own conduct we have been compelled

to engage in the present war. In its prosecution, we seek not

her overthrow as a nation, but, in vindicating our national

honor, we seek to obtain redress for the wrongs she has done us,

and indemnity for our just demands against her. We demand an

honorable peace; and that peace must bring with it indemnity for

the past, and security for the future."

While some were for total absorption, others were for half; and for

taking a line (provisionally during the war), preparatory to its

becoming permanent at its close, and giving to the United States

the northern States of Mexico from gulf to gulf. This project the

President also repulsed in a paragraph of his message:

"To retire to a line, and simply hold and defend it, would not

terminate the war. On the contrary, it would encourage Mexico to

persevere, and tend to protract it indefinitely. It is not to be

expected that Mexico, after refusing to establish such a line as

a permanent boundary when our victorious army are in possession

of her capital, and in the heart of her country, would permit us

to hold it without resistance. That she would continue the war,

and in the most harassing and annoying forms, there can be no

doubt. A border warfare of the most savage character, extending

over a long line, would be unceasingly waged. It would require

a large army to be kept constantly in the field stationed at

posts and garrisons along such a line, to protect and defend

it. The enemy, relieved from the pressure of our arms on his

coasts and in the populous parts of the interior, would direct

his attention to this line, and selecting an isolated post for

attack, would concentrate his forces upon it. This would be a

condition of affairs which the Mexicans, pursuing their favorite

system of guerilla warfare, would probably prefer to any other.

Were we to assume a defensive attitude on such a line, all the

advantages of such a state of war would be on the side of the

enemy. We could levy no contributions upon him, or in any other

way make him feel the pressure of the war; but must remain

inactive, and wait his approach, being in constant uncertainty

at what point on the line, or at what time, he might make an

assault. He may assemble and organize an overwhelming force

in the interior, on his own side of the line, and, concealing

his purpose, make a sudden assault on some one of our posts so

distant from any other as to prevent the possibility of timely

succor or reinforcements; and in this way our gallant army would

be exposed to the danger of being cut off in detail; or if by

their unequalled bravery and prowess every where exhibited

during this war, they should repulse the enemy, their number

stationed at any one post may be too small to pursue him. If the

enemy be repulsed in one attack, he would have nothing to do but

to retreat to his own side of the line, and being in no fear of

a pursuing army, may reinforce himself at leisure, for another

attack on the same or some other post. He may, too, cross the

line between our posts, make rapid incursions into the country

which we hold, murder the inhabitants, commit depredations on

them, and then retreat to the interior before a sufficient

force can be concentrated to pursue him. Such would probably be

the harassing character of a mere defensive war on our part.

If our forces, when attacked, or threatened with attack, be

permitted to cross the line, drive back the enemy, and conquer

him, this would be again to invade the enemy's country, after

having lost all the advantages of the conquests we have already

made by having voluntarily abandoned them. To hold such a line

successfully and in security, it is far from being certain that

it would not require as large an army as would be necessary to

hold all the conquests we have already made, and to continue the

prosecution of the war in the heart of the enemy's country. It

is also far from being certain that the expense of the war would

be diminished by such a policy."

These were the same arguments which Senator Benton had addressed to

the President the year before, when the recommendation of this line

of occupation had gone into the draught of his message, as a cabinet

measure, and was with such difficulty got out of it; but without

getting it out of the head of Mr. Calhoun and his political friends.

To return to the argument against such a line, in this subsequent

message, bespoke an adherence to it on the part of some formidable

interest, which required to be authoritatively combated: and such

was the fact. The formidable interest which wished a separation of

the slave from the free States, wished also as an extension of their

Southern territory, to obtain a broad slice from Mexico, embracing

Tampico as a port on the east, Guaymas as a port on the Gulf of

California, and Monterey and Saltillo in the middle. Mr. Polk did

not sympathize with that interest, and publicly repulsed their

plan--without, however, extinguishing their scheme--which survives,

and still labors at its consummation in a different form, and with

more success.

The expenses of the government during that season of war, were the

next interesting head of the message, and were presented, all heads

of expenditure included, at some fifty-eight millions of dollars; or

a quarter less than those same expenses now are in a state of peace

The message says:

"It is estimated that the receipts into the Treasury for the

fiscal year ending on the 30th of June, 1848, including the

balance in the Treasury on the 1st of July last, will amount

to forty-two millions eight hundred and eighty-six thousand

five hundred and forty-five dollars and eighty cents; of which

thirty-one millions, it is estimated, will be derived from

customs; three millions five hundred thousand from the sale of

the public lands; four hundred thousand from incidental sources;

including sales made by the solicitor of the Treasury; and six

millions two hundred and eighty-five thousand two hundred and

ninety-four dollars and fifty-five cents from loans already

authorized by law, which, together with the balance in the

Treasury on the 1st of July last, make the sum estimated. The

expenditures for the same period, if peace with Mexico shall not

be concluded, and the army shall be increased as is proposed,

will amount, including the necessary payments on account of

principal and interest of the public debt and Treasury notes, to

fifty-eight millions six hundred and fifteen thousand and sixty

dollars and seven cents."

An encomium upon the good working of the independent treasury

system, and the perpetual repulse of paper money from the federal

Treasury, concluded the heads of this message which retain a

surviving interest:

"The financial system established by the constitutional Treasury

has been, thus far, eminently successful in its operations; and

I recommend an adherence to all its essential provisions; and

especially to that vital provision, which wholly separates the

government from all connection with banks, and excludes bank

paper from all revenue receipts."

An earnest exhortation to a vigorous prosecution of the war

concluded the message.

Thirty Years' View (Vol. 2 of 2) or, A History of the Working of the American Government for Thirty Years, from 1820 to 1850 · 第 171 / 202 章