CHAPTER CLXVI.

THE WILMOT PROVISO; OR, PROHIBITION OF SLAVERY IN THE TERRITORIES:

ITS INUTILITY AND MISCHIEF.

Scarcely was the war with Mexico commenced when means, different

from those of arms, were put in operation to finish it. One of these

was the return of the exiled Santa Anna (as has been shown) to his

country, and his restoration to power, under the belief that he

was favorable to peace, and for which purpose arrangements began

to be made from the day of the declaration of the war--or before.

In the same session another move was made in the same direction,

that of getting peace by peaceable means, in an application made to

Congress by the President, to place three millions of dollars at

his disposal, to be used in negotiating for a boundary which should

give us additional territory: and that recommendation not having

been acted upon at the war session, was renewed at the commencement

of the next one. It was recommended as an "important measure for

securing a speedy peace;" and as an argument in favor of granting

it, a sum of two millions similarly placed at the disposition of Mr.

Jefferson when about to negotiate for Florida (which ended in the

acquisition of Louisiana), was plead as a precedent; and justly.

Congress, at this second application, granted the appropriation;

but while it was depending, Mr. Wilmot, a member of Congress, from

Pennsylvania, moved a proviso, _that no part of the territory to

be acquired should be open to the introduction of slavery_. It was

a proposition not necessary for the purpose of excluding slavery,

as the only territory to be acquired was that of New Mexico and

California, where slavery was already prohibited by the Mexican laws

and constitution; and where it could not be carried until those

laws should be repealed, and a law for slavery passed. The proviso

was nugatory, and could answer no purpose but that of bringing on

a slavery agitation in the United States; for which purpose it

was immediately seized upon by Mr. Calhoun and his friends, and

treated as the greatest possible outrage and injury to the slave

States. Congress was occupied with this proviso for two sessions,

became excessively heated on the subject, and communicated its

heat to the legislatures of the slave States--by several of which

conditional disunion resolutions were passed. Every where, in the

slave States, the Wilmot Proviso became a Gorgon's head--a chimera

dire--a watchword of party, and the synonyme of civil war and the

dissolution of the Union. Many patriotic members were employed in

resisting the proviso as a _bona fide_ cause of breaking up the

Union, if adopted; many amiable and gentle-tempered members were

employed in devising modes of adjusting and compromising it; a few,

of whom Mr. Benton was one, produced the laws and the constitution

of Mexico to show that New Mexico and California were free from

slavery; and argued that neither party had any thing to fear, or to

hope--the free soil party nothing to fear, because the soil was now

free; the slave soil party nothing to hope, because they could not

take a step to make it slave soil, having just invented the dogma

of "No power in Congress to legislate upon slavery in territories."

Never were two parties so completely at loggerheads about nothing:

never did two parties contend more furiously against the greatest

possible evil. Close observers, who had been watching the progress

of the slavery agitation since its inauguration in Congress in 1835,

knew it to be a game played by the abolitionists on one side and

the disunionists on the other, to accomplish their own purposes.

Many courageous men denounced it as such--as a game to be kept up

for the political benefit of the players; and deplored the blindness

which could not see their determination to keep it agoing to the

last possible moment, and to the production of the greatest possible

degree of national and sectional exasperation. It was while this

contention was thus raging, that Mr. Calhoun wrote a confidential

letter to a member of the Alabama legislature, hugging this

proviso to his bosom as a fortunate event--as a means of "_forcing

the issue_" between the North and the South; and deprecating

any adjustment, compromise, or defeat of it, as a misfortune to

the South: and which letter has since come to light. Gentle and

credulous people, who believed him to be in earnest when he was

sounding the _tocsin_ to rouse the States, instigating them to pass

disunion resolutions, and stirring up both national and village

orators to attack the proviso unto death: such persons must be

amazed to read in that exhumed letter, written during the fiercest

of the strife, these ominous words:

"_With this impression I would regard any compromise or

adjustment of the proviso, or even its defeat, without meeting

the danger in its whole length and breadth, as very unfortunate

for us. It would lull us to sleep again, without removing the

danger, or materially diminishing it._"

This issue to be forced was a separation of the slave and the free

States; the means, a commercial non-intercourse, in shutting the

slave State seaports against the vessels of the free States; the

danger to be met, was in the trial of this issue, by the means

indicated; which were simply high treason when pursued to the

overt act. Mr. Calhoun had flinched from that act in the time

of Jackson, but he being dead, and no more Jacksons at the head

of the government, he rejoiced in another chance of meeting the

danger--meeting it in all its length and breadth; and deprecated the

loss of the proviso as the loss of this chance.

Truly the abolitionists and the nullifiers were necessary to

each other--the two halves of a pair of shears, neither of which

could cut until joined together. Then the map of the Union was in

danger; for in their conjunction, that map was cloth between the

edges of the shears. And this was that Wilmot Proviso, which for

two years convulsed the Union, and prostrated men of firmness

and patriotism--a thing of nothing in itself, but magnified into

a hideous reality, and seized upon to conflagrate the States and

dissolve the Union. The Wilmot Proviso was not passed: that chance

of forcing the issue was lost: another had to be found, or made.

Thirty Years' View (Vol. 2 of 2) or, A History of the Working of the American Government for Thirty Years, from 1820 to 1850 · 第 167 / 202 章