THE COSMOPOLITE.

* * * * *

We love an occasional stroll into the environs of London--_on foot_--and

_alone_. On foot, because we hate the machinery of a coach--and alone,

because we have only our own leisure to consult, and there is no time lost

in "making up minds." On such occasions we have no set object in view, but

we determine to make "good in every thing." A book, great or small, is then

to us a great evil; and putting a map into one's pocket is about as absurd

as Peter Fin's taking Cook's Voyages on his journey to Brighton. We read

the other day of a reviewer who started from Charing Cross with a blue bag

filled with books for his criticship: he read at Camberwell, and he read at

Dulwich--he wrote in the sanded and smoke-dried parlour of the Lion, the

Lamb, or the Fox--and he wrote whilst his steak was grilling at the

_auberge_ at Dulwich--and he went home in a hackney-coach: "Lord how he

went out--Lord how he came in." Another brother talks of rambling in a

secluded village field with Gilbert White's "Natural History of Selborne,"

or the "Journal of a Naturalist," in his hand. All this is very pleasant

and mighty pretty; but it is not true; and we stake our critical character

that neither Gilbert White nor our "Naturalist" did such things, or if they

did, that they were not essential to their writings. Making notes and

comparing them with others, after a long walk, is another matter; but to

walk out into the country to read a book on natural philosophy is not

indicative of a susceptible mind. For our own part, we want no book but the

broad volume of Nature--but to derive profit as well as pleasure, we must

go out with some of the philosophy of Nature in our hearts--for walking is

like travelling, (which is only a long walk,)--"a man must carry knowledge

with him, if he would bring home knowledge." We think Mr. Hazlitt talks of

lying a whole day on Salisbury Plain as one of his greatest enjoyments, and

he is doubtless sincere. When we set out on such a walk as we are about to

take, with the reader's consent, we quote Thomson for our exordium:--

To me be Nature's volume broad display'd;

And to peruse its all instructive page,

* * * * *

My sole delight; as through the falling glooms

Pensive I stray, or with the rising dawn

On Fancy's eagle wing excursive soar;

--and starting from our metropolis, we love to watch the ebbing of

population, the dwindling from groves of chimneys and worlds of bricks and

mortar to tricksy cottages marshalled with the plumb-line, or sprinkled

over "farmy fields" facing Macadamized roads, and collecting more dust in

one month than would have ransomed all the captive kings of history, sacred

or profane. There we love to trace the ramifications of art from the steam

and gas chimneys of the metropolis to the quiet dell, in whose seclusion

you might imagine yourself a hundred miles from town, were it not for the

hum of the great tun that is fretting and working at a distance. On the

road you enjoy scenes that are to be found in no printed book. Nay, every

sign-board is a study. Those near the town would do honour to the

President's pencil; as you advance, they retrograde--and as Art declines,

Nature smiles still sweeter and softer in never-ending successions of woods

and groves, hills and dales, glassy lakes and pebbly streams, with all the

variegated charms of rustic life.

But we are getting too _rural_; for our "Suburban Stroll" extended but to

Dulwich and back, about four miles south of London. Twenty years since, we

remember, the parish of Camberwell (which includes Peckham and Dulwich) was

a pleasant village, with several mansions inhabited by citizens of

property, who retired hither for air and recreation; now the whole district

is crowded with lath and plaster cottages, and sugar-bakers' boxes, which

appear well adapted for twelfth-cake kings and queens.[7] Twenty years ago,

we enjoyed the embowered walk of Camberwell Grove, and above all, _Grove

Hill_, the retreat of Dr. John Coakley Lettsom, till his benevolence

overmuch obliged him to part with this delightful residence. Well do we

remember the picturesque effect of Grove Hill, the unostentatious,

casino-like villa, ornamented with classic figures of Liberality, Plenty,

and Flora--and the sheet of water whose surface was broken by a stream from

a dank and moss-crusted fountain in its centre. Then, the high, overarching

grove, and its summit, traditionally said to be the spot where George

Barnwell murdered his uncle, the incident that gave rise to Lillo's

pathetic tragedy. But the march of improvement has extended hither--the

walk can scarcely be traced: still there is abundance of timber, for the

grove has disappeared, and scores of new houses have sprung up with almost

magical effect--and the whole scene reminds us of one of the change-scenes

of a pantomime. The builder's _share_ has turned over nearly every inch of

the ground, and fresh gravel and loose loam remind the philosophical

pedestrian that all is change beneath as well as on the surface. Of the

mock villas that have been "put up" in this quarter, we must speak with

forbearance. Their little bits of Gothic plastered here and there; their

puny machicolations, square and pointed arches, and stained glass "cut out

into little stars"--are but sorry specimens of taste, and but poor

indications of comfort. They seem to totter like card-houses, and all their

spick-and-span finery vanishes beside a wing of the picturesque--a cottage

in true rustic taste, with rudely-arched virandahs, formed of limbs and

trunks of trees, intermixed with evergreens, and reminding us of the

"gnarled oaks and soft myrtles" of the poet's fancy; and with trimmed

arches of thatch over little casements, with flowers

"Blinding the lower panes."

Now is the little hatch-gate slammed with the wind, contrasting its rude

sound with the rusty creak of the "invisible" iron fence just set up, but

already

So loose that it but wants another push

To leap from off its hinges;

--the milk-white window-sill, or painted flower-pots ranged on bars of

cast-iron, like so many toys of Nature. Such was the contrast when we last

visited the "Grove;" the picturesque cottage was then as we have described

it, and its new-born neighbours were rising fast on every side, and we

would not insure its existence for a week longer; for the slicing, cutting,

and carving of this once beautiful spot, exceeds all credibility. With all

these changes, however, the fine panoramic view of two hundred miles may

still be enjoyed from this spot, and overlooking the meaner glories of the

GREAT CITY at your feet, the eye rests on the "sister hills," Harrow spire,

and where

Majestic Windsor lifts his princely brow;

Shooter's Hill and Greenwich, with tower, dome, and turret; Sydenham and

Norwood on the south; and Chelsea and the _unbridged_ winding Thames on the

west. Art has not yet thrown up her screens, so as to fence in this world

of beauties from our enjoyment. Here we sit down and rest our recreant

limbs, leaving the reader to enjoy the innumerable reflections which our

poor mention has called up. Another fine day, and we may proceed in our

stroll.

The Mirror of Literature, Amusement, and Instruction. Volume 13, No. 363, March 28, 1829 · 第 42 / 55 题