42. Now, according to the orthodox practice in modern architecture, the

most delicate and minute pieces of sculpture on that building are at the

very top of it, just under its gutter. You cannot see them in a dark

day, and perhaps may never, to this hour, have noticed them at all. But

there they are: sixty-six finished heads of lions, all exactly the same;

and, therefore, I suppose, executed on some noble Greek type, too noble

to allow any modest Modern to think of improving upon it. But whether

executed on a Greek type or no, it is to be presumed that, as there are

sixty-six of them alike, and on so important a building as that which is

to contain your school of design, and which is the principal example of

the Athenian style in modern Athens, there must be something especially

admirable in them, and deserving your most attentive contemplation. In

order, therefore, that you might have a fair opportunity of estimating

their beauty, I was desirous of getting a sketch of a real lion's head

to compare with them, and my friend Mr. Millais kindly offered to draw

both the one and the other for me. You have not, however, at present, a

lion in your zoological collection; and it being, as you are probably

aware, the first principle of Pre-Raphaelitism, as well as essential to

my object in the present instance, that no drawing should be made except

from Nature itself, I was obliged to be content with a tiger's head,

which, however, will answer my purpose just as well, in enabling you to

compare a piece of true, faithful, and natural work with modern

architectural sculpture. Here, in the first place, is Mr. Millais'

drawing from the _living_ beast (_fig._ 17, frontispiece). I have not

the least fear but that you will at once acknowledge its truth and feel

its power. Prepare yourselves next for the Grecian sublimity of the

_ideal_ beast, from the cornice of your schools of design. Behold it

(_fig._ 18).

43. Now we call ourselves civilized and refined in matters of art, but I

assure you it is seldom that, in the very basest and coarsest grotesques

of the inferior Gothic workmen, anything so contemptible as this head

can be ever found. _They_ only sink into such a failure accidentally,

and in a single instance; and we, in our civilization, repeat this noble

piece of work threescore and six times over, as not being able to invent

anything else so good! Do not think Mr. Millais has caricatured it. It

is drawn with the strictest fidelity; photograph one of the heads

to-morrow, and you will find the photograph tell you the same tale.

Neither imagine that this is an unusual example of modern work. Your

banks and public offices are covered with ideal lions' heads in every

direction, and you will find them all just as bad as this. And, farther,

note that the admission of such barbarous types of sculpture is not

_merely_ ridiculous; it is seriously harmful to your powers of

perceiving truth or beauty of any kind or at any time. Imagine the

effect on the minds of your children of having such representations of a

lion's head as this thrust upon them perpetually; and consider what a

different effect might be produced upon them if, instead of this barren

and insipid absurdity, every boss on your buildings were, according to

the workman's best ability, a faithful rendering of the form of some

existing animal, so that all their walls were so many pages of natural

history. And, finally, consider the difference, with respect to the mind

of the workman himself, between being kept all his life carving, by

sixties, and forties, and thirties, repetitions of one false and futile

model,--and being sent, for every piece of work he had to execute, to

make a stern and faithful study from some living creature of God.

[Illustration: PLATE XI. (Fig. 17., Fig. 18.)]

44. And this last consideration enables me to press this subject on you

on far higher grounds than I have done yet.

I have hitherto appealed only to your national pride, or to your common

sense; but surely I should treat a Scottish audience with indignity if I

appealed not finally to something higher than either of them,--to their

religious principles.

You know how often it is difficult to be wisely charitable, to do good

without multiplying the sources of evil. You know that to give alms is

nothing unless you give thought also; and that therefore it is written,

not "blessed is he that _feedeth_ the poor," but, "blessed is he that

_considereth_ the poor." And you know that a little thought and a little

kindness are often worth more than a great deal of money.

45. Now this charity of thought is not merely to be exercised towards

the poor; it is to be exercised towards all men. There is assuredly no

action of our social life, however unimportant, which, by kindly

thought, may not be made to have a beneficial influence upon others; and

it is impossible to spend the smallest sum of money, for any not

absolutely necessary purpose, without a grave responsibility attaching

to the manner of spending it. The object we ourselves covet may, indeed,

be desirable and harmless, so far as we are concerned, but the providing

us with it may, perhaps, be a very prejudicial occupation to some one

else. And then it becomes instantly a moral question, whether we are to

indulge ourselves or not. Whatever we wish to buy, we ought first to

consider not only if the thing be fit for us, but if the manufacture of

it be a wholesome and happy one; and if, on the whole, the sum we are

going to spend will do as much good spent in this way as it would if

spent in any other way. It may be said that we have not time to consider

all this before we make a purchase. But no time could be spent in a more

important duty; and God never imposes a duty without giving the time to

do it. Let us, however, only acknowledge the principle;--once make up

your mind to allow the consideration of the _effect_ of your purchases

to regulate the _kind_ of your purchase, and you will soon easily find

grounds enough to decide upon. The plea of ignorance will never take

away our responsibilities. It is written, "If thou sayest, Behold, we

knew it not; doth not He that pondereth the heart consider it? and He

that keepeth thy soul, doth not He know it?"

46. I could press this on you at length, but I hasten to apply the

principle to the subject of art. I will do so broadly at first, and then

come to architecture. Enormous sums are spent annually by this country

in what is called patronage of art, but in what is for the most part

merely buying what strikes our fancies. True and judicious patronage

there is indeed; many a work of art is bought by those who do not care

for its possession, to assist the struggling artist, or relieve the

unsuccessful one. But for the most part, I fear we are too much in the

habit of buying simply what we like best, wholly irrespective of any

good to be done, either to the artist or to the schools of the country.

Now let us remember, that every farthing we spend on objects of art has

influence over men's minds and spirits, far more than over their bodies.

By the purchase of every print which hangs on your walls, of every cup

out of which you drink, and every table off which you eat your bread,

you are educating a mass of men in one way or another. You are either

employing them healthily or unwholesomely; you are making them lead

happy or unhappy lives; you are leading them to look at Nature, and to

love her--to think, to feel, to enjoy,--or you are blinding them to

Nature, and keeping them bound, like beasts of burden, in mechanical and

monotonous employments. We shall all be asked one day, why we did not

think more of this.

47. "Well, but," you will say, "how can we decide what we ought to buy,

but by our likings? You would not have us buy what we don't like?" No,

but I would have you thoroughly sure that there _is_ an absolute right

and wrong in all art, and try to find out the right, and like that; and,

secondly, sometimes to sacrifice a careless preference or fancy, to what

you know is for the good of your fellow-creatures. For instance, when

you spend a guinea upon an engraving, what have you done? You have paid

a man for a certain number of hours to sit at a dirty table, in a dirty

room, inhaling the fumes of nitric acid, stooping over a steel plate, on

which, by the help of a magnifying glass, he is, one by one, laboriously

cutting out certain notches and scratches, of which the effect is to be

the copy of another man's work. You cannot suppose you have done a very

charitable thing in this! On the other hand, whenever you buy a small

water-color drawing, you have employed a man happily and healthily,

working in a clean room (if he likes), or more probably still, out in

the pure country and fresh air, thinking about something, and learning

something every moment; not straining his eyesight, nor breaking his

back, but working in ease and happiness. Therefore if you _can_ like a

modest water-color better than an elaborate engraving, do. There may

indeed be engravings which are worth the suffering it costs to produce

them; but at all events, engravings of public dinners and laying of

foundation-stones, and such things, might be dispensed with. The

engraving ought to be a first-rate picture of a first-rate subject to be

worth buying.

48. Farther, I know that many conscientious persons are desirous of

encouraging art, but feel at the same time that their judgment is not

certain enough to secure their choice of the best kind of art. To such

persons I would now especially address myself, fully admitting the

greatness of their difficulty. It is not an easy thing to acquire a

knowledge of painting; and it is by no means a desirable thing to

encourage bad painting. One bad painter makes another, and one bad

painting will often spoil a great many healthy judgments. I could name

popular painters now living, who have retarded the taste of their

generation by twenty years. Unless, therefore, we are certain not merely

that we like a painting, but that we are _right_ in liking it, we should

never buy it. For there is one way of spending money which is perfectly

safe, and in which we may be absolutely sure of doing good. I mean, by

paying for simple sculpture of natural objects, chiefly flowers and

animals. You are aware that the possibilities of error in sculpture are

much less than in painting; it is altogether an easier and simpler art,

invariably attaining perfection long before painting, in the progress of

a national mind. It may indeed be corrupted by false taste, or thrown

into erroneous forms; but for the most part, the feebleness of a

sculptor is shown in imperfection and rudeness, rather than in definite

error. He does not reach the fineness of the forms of Nature; but he

approaches them truly up to a certain point, or, if not so, at all

events an honest effort will continually improve him: so that if we set

a simple natural form before him, and tell him to copy it, we are sure

we have given him a wholesome and useful piece of education; but if we

told him to paint it, he might, with all the honesty in the world, paint

it wrongly and falsely, to the end of his days.

49. So much for the workman. But the workman is not the only person

concerned. Observe farther, that when you buy a print, the enjoyment of

it is confined to yourself and to your friends. But if you carve a piece

of stone, and put it on the outside of your house, it will give pleasure

to every person who passes along the street--to an innumerable

multitude, instead of a few.

Nay, but, you say, we ourselves shall not be benefited by the sculpture

on the outsides of our houses. Yes, you will, and in an extraordinary

degree; for, observe farther, that architecture differs from painting

peculiarly in being an art of _accumulation_. The prints bought by your

friends, and hung up in their houses, have no collateral effect with

yours: they must be separately examined, and if ever they were hung side

by side, they would rather injure than assist each other's effect. But

the sculpture on your friend's house unites in effect with that on your

own. The two houses form one grand mass--far grander than either

separately; much more if a third be added--and a fourth; much more if

the whole street--if the whole city--join in the solemn harmony of

sculpture. Your separate possessions of pictures and prints are to you

as if you sang pieces of music with your single voices in your own

houses. But your architecture would be as if you all sang together in

one mighty choir. In the separate picture, it is rare that there exists

any very high source of sublime emotion; but the great concerted music

of the streets of the city, when turret rises over turret, and casement

frowns beyond casement, and tower succeeds to tower along the farthest

ridges of the inhabited hills,--this is a sublimity of which you can at

present form no conception; and capable, I believe, of exciting almost

the deepest emotion that art can ever strike from the bosoms of men.

And justly the deepest: for it is a law of God and of Nature, that your

pleasures--as your virtues--shall be enhanced by mutual aid. As, by

joining hand in hand, you can sustain each other best, so, hand in hand,

you can delight each other best. And there is indeed a charm and

sacredness in street architecture which must be wanting even to that of

the temple: it is a little thing for men to unite in the forms of a

religious service, but it is much for them to unite, like true brethren,

in the arts and offices of their daily lives.

50. And now, I can conceive only of one objection as likely still to

arise in your minds, which I must briefly meet. Your pictures, and other

smaller works of art, you can carry with you, wherever you live; your

house must be left behind. Indeed, I believe that the wandering habits

which have now become almost necessary to our existence, lie more at the

root of our bad architecture than any other character of modern times.

We always look upon our houses as mere temporary lodgings. We are always

hoping to get larger and finer ones, or are forced, in some way or

other, to live where we do not choose, and in continual expectation of

changing our place of abode. In the present state of society, this is in

a great measure unavoidable; but let us remember it is an _evil_; and

that so far as it _is_ avoidable, it becomes our duty to check the

impulse. It is not for me to lead you at present into any consideration

of a matter so closely touching your private interests and feelings; but

it surely is a subject for serious thought, whether it might not be

better for many of us, if, on attaining a certain position in life, we

determined, with God's permission, to choose a home in which to live and

die,--a home not to be increased by adding stone to stone and field to

field, but which, being enough for all our wishes at that period, we

should resolve to be satisfied with forever. Consider this; and also,

whether we ought not to be more in the habit of seeking honor from our

descendants than our ancestors; thinking it better to be nobly

remembered than nobly born; and striving so to live, that our sons, and

our sons' sons, for ages to come, might still lead their children

reverently to the doors out of which we had been carried to the grave,

saying, "Look: This was his house: This was his chamber."

51. I believe that you can bring forward no other serious objection to

the principles for which I am pleading. They are so simple, and, it

seems to me, so incontrovertible, that I trust you will not leave this

room, without determining, as you have opportunity, to do something to

advance this long-neglected art of domestic architecture. The reasons I

have laid before you would have weight, even were I to ask you to go to

some considerable expenditure beyond what you at present are accustomed

to devote to such purposes; but nothing more would be needed than the

diversion of expenditures, at present scattered and unconsidered, into a

single and effective channel. Nay, the mere interest of the money which

we are accustomed to keep dormant by us in the form of plate and

jewelry, would alone be enough to sustain a school of magnificent

architecture. And although, in highly wrought plate, and in finely

designed jewelry, noble art may occasionally exist, yet in general both

jewels and services of silver are matters of ostentation, much more than

sources of intellectual pleasure. There are also many evils connected

with them--they are a care to their possessors, a temptation to the

dishonest, and a trouble and bitterness to the poor. So that I cannot

but think that part of the wealth which now lies buried in these

doubtful luxuries, might most wisely and kindly be thrown into a form

which would give perpetual pleasure, not to its possessor only, but to

thousands besides, and neither tempt the unprincipled, nor inflame the

envious, nor mortify the poor; while, supposing that your own dignity

was dear to you, this, you may rely upon it, would be more impressed

upon others by the nobleness of your house-walls than by the glistening

of your sideboards.

[Illustration: PLATE XII. (Fig. 19.)]

52. And even supposing that some additional expenditure _were_ required

for this purpose, are we indeed so much poorer than our ancestors, that

we cannot now, in all the power of Britain, afford to do what was done

by every small republic, by every independent city, in the Middle Ages,

throughout France, Italy, and Germany? I am not aware of a vestige of

domestic architecture, belonging to the great mediaeval periods, which,

according to its material and character, is not richly decorated. But

look here (_fig._ 19), look to what an extent decoration _has_ been

carried in the domestic edifices of a city, I suppose not much superior

in importance, commercially speaking, to Manchester, Liverpool, or

Birmingham--namely, Rouen, in Normandy. This is a _garret_ window, still

existing there,--a garret window built by William de Bourgtheroude in

the early part of the sixteenth century. I show it you, first, as a

proof of what may be made of the features of domestic buildings we are

apt to disdain; and secondly, as another example of a beautiful use of

the pointed arch, filled by the solid shield of stone, and inclosing a

square casement. It is indeed a peculiarly rich and beautiful instance,

but it is a type of which many examples still exist in France, and of

which many once existed in your own Scotland, of ruder work indeed, but

admirable always in the effect upon the outline of the building.[18]

[Footnote 18: One of the most beautiful instances I know of this kind of

window is in the ancient house of the Maxwells, on the estate of Sir

John Maxwell of Polloc. I had not seen it when I gave this lecture, or I

should have preferred it, as an example, to that of Rouen, with

reference to modern possibilities of imitation.]

53. I do not, however, hope that you will often be able to go as far as

this in decoration; in fact I would rather recommend a simpler style to

you, founded on earlier examples; but, if possible, aided by color,

introduced in various kinds of naturally colored stones. I have

observed that your Scottish lapidaries have admirable taste and skill in

the disposition of the pebbles of your brooches and other ornaments of

dress; and I have not the least doubt that the genius of your country

would, if directed to this particular style of architecture, produce

works as beautiful as they would be thoroughly national. The Gothic of

Florence, which owes at least the half of its beauty to the art of

inlaying, would furnish you with exquisite examples; its sculpture is

indeed the most perfect which was ever produced by the Gothic schools;

but, besides this rich sculpture, all its flat surfaces are inlaid with

colored stones, much being done with a green serpentine, which forms the

greater part of the coast of Genoa. You have, I believe, large beds of

this rock in Scotland, and other stones besides, peculiarly Scottish,

calculated to form as noble a school of color as ever existed.[19]

[Footnote 19: A series of four examples of designs for windows was

exhibited at this point of the lecture, but I have not engraved them, as

they were hastily made for the purposes of momentary illustration, and

are not such as I choose to publish or perpetuate.]

54. And, now, I have but two things more to say to you in conclusion.

Most of the lecturers whom you allow to address you, lay before you

views of the sciences they profess, which are either generally received,

or incontrovertible. I come before you at a disadvantage; for I cannot

conscientiously tell you anything about architecture but what is at

variance with all commonly received views upon the subject. I come

before you, professedly to speak of things forgotten or things disputed;

and I lay before you, not accepted principles, but questions at issue.

Of those questions you are to be the judges, and to you I appeal. You

must not, when you leave this room, if you feel doubtful of the truth of

what I have said, refer yourselves to some architect of established

reputation, and ask him whether I am right or not. You might as well,

had you lived in the sixteenth century, have asked a Roman Catholic

archbishop his opinion of the first reformer. I deny his jurisdiction;

I refuse his decision. I call upon you to be Bereans in architecture, as

you are in religion, and to search into these things for yourselves.

Remember that, however candid a man may be, it is too much to expect of

him when his career in life has been successful, to turn suddenly on the

highway, and to declare that all he has learned has been false, and all

he has done, worthless; yet nothing less than such a declaration as this

must be made by nearly every existing architect, before he admitted the

truth of one word that I have said to you this evening. You must be

prepared, therefore, to hear my opinions attacked with all the virulence

of established interest, and all the pertinacity of confirmed prejudice;

you will hear them made the subjects of every species of satire and

invective; but one kind of opposition to them you will never hear; you

will never hear them met by quiet, steady, rational argument; for that

is the one way in which they _cannot_ be met. You will constantly hear

me accused--you yourselves may be the first to accuse me--of presumption

in speaking thus confidently against the established authority of ages.

Presumption! Yes, if I had spoken on my own authority; but I have

appealed to two incontrovertible and irrefragable witnesses--to the

nature that is around you--to the reason that is within you. And if you

are willing in this matter to take the voice of authority _against_ that

of nature and of reason, take it in other things also. Take it in

religion, as you do in architecture. It is not by a Scottish

audience--not by the descendants of the Reformer and the

Covenanter--that I expected to be met with a refusal to believe that the

world might possibly have been wrong for _three_ hundred years, in their

ways of carving stones and setting up of pillars, when they know that

they were wrong for _twelve_ hundred years, in their marking how the

roads divided, that led to Hell and Heaven.

55. You must expect at first that there will be difficulties and

inconsistencies in carrying out the new style; but they will soon be

conquered if you attempt not too much at once. Do not be afraid of

incongruities--do not think of unities of effect. Introduce your Gothic

line by line and stone by stone; never mind mixing it with your present

architecture; your existing houses will be none the worse for having

little bits of better work fitted to them; build a porch, or point a

window, if you can do nothing else; and remember that it is the glory of

Gothic architecture that it can do _anything_. Whatever you really and

seriously want, Gothic will do for you; but it must be an _earnest_

want. It is its pride to accommodate itself to your needs; and the one

general law under which it acts is simply this,--find out what will make

you comfortable, build that in the strongest and boldest way, and then

set your fancy free in the decoration of it. Don't do anything to

imitate this cathedral or that, however beautiful. Do what is

convenient; and if the form be a new one, so much the better; then set

your mason's wits to work, to find out some new way of treating it. Only

be steadily determined that, even if you cannot get the best Gothic, at

least you will have no Greek; and in a few years' time--in less time

than you could learn a new science or a new language thoroughly--the

whole art of your native country will be reanimated.

Lectures on Architecture and Painting, Delivered at Edinburgh in November 1853 · 第 4 / 11 段