BEWICK’S WREN; LONG-TAILED HOUSE WREN.

_Troglodytes bewickii_, AUD. Orn. Biog. I, 1831, 96, pl. xviii.—IB.

Birds Am. II, 1841, 120, pl. cxviii. _Thryothorus bewickii_,

BONAP. List, 1838.—BAIRD, Birds N. Am. 1858, 363. _Telmatodytes

bewickii_, CAB. Mus. Hein. I, 1850, 78. _Thryothorus bewickii_,

var. _bewickii_, BAIRD, Rev. Am. B. 1864, 126.

SP. CHAR. Above dark rufous-brown; rump and middle tail-feathers

sometimes a little paler, and very slightly tinged with gray, and

together with the exposed surface of secondaries distinctly barred

with dusky. Beneath soiled plumbeous-whitish; flanks brown. Crissum

banded; ground-color of quills and tail-feathers brownish-black.

Length, 5.50; wing, 2.25; tail, 2.50. Length from nostril, 39; along

gape, 70.

HAB. Eastern Province of United States.

HABITS. This interesting species of Wren was first met with by Audubon

in Louisiana. A number of individuals were observed at the time, but

nothing of its history was known for several years afterward. In

shape, color, and habits it most resembled the Carolina Wren, but was

less rapid in movement, and not so lively. Fourteen years later Dr.

Bachman again met with birds of this species, in 1835, at the Salt

Sulphur Springs of Virginia. They comprised a family of two parents

and five young, nearly full grown. Their notes were like those of the

Winter Wren, neither louder nor more connected. They seemed of

restless habit, creeping actively among fences, stumps, and logs. One

ascended an oak, nearly to the top, in the manner of a Creeper. This

species proved to be quite common in that locality, and to be the only

Wren abundant among the mountains. Dr. Gibbs detected it near

Columbia, S. C., and Dr. Trudeau afterwards found it quite common in

Louisiana.

It was first observed breeding by Professor Baird in Carlisle, Penn.,

in 1844. In all respects the nests and their location corresponded

with those of the common Wren. Dr. Woodhouse found it very abundant in

the Indian Territory, and describes its habits as similar to those of

other Wrens. Lieutenant Couch observed this Wren at Santa Rosalio in

Mexico, early in March. It was seeking its food among the low

prickly-pears. He was informed that they deposited their eggs wherever

they could do so without making much of a nest, inside the cabins

under the rafters, but in New Leon he found one of its nests quite

elaborately constructed in a thatched roof. He describes the song as

quite varied, and one of the sweetest that he heard in that country.

The late Dr. Gerhardt of Varnell’s Station, Ga., met with this species

among the mountainous portions of Northern Georgia, where it generally

nested in holes in stumps. In one instance the nest was constructed

five inches in length, and four in diameter, with a cavity two inches

in depth, and the walls of great proportionate thickness, made

externally of coarse roots, finer on the inside, and lined with

various kinds of animal fur and with feathers. Both birds worked

together in constructing their nest, beginning on the 11th of April,

and on the 27th of the same month this contained seven eggs. The nest

was not covered at the top, in the manner of the Carolina Wren. In the

following season another pair commenced building their nest in his

bed, in a log-house. Driven from these impossible quarters, they tried

the same experiment in various other parts of the house, but only to

abandon it, and at last finished by making a successful attempt in the

hay-loft. Their visits to that portion of Georgia, he informed me,

were irregular and only occasional. In 1859 he had not met with any

birds of this species for the space of five years.

The eggs measure .67 by .50 of an inch in their average proportions,

resembling somewhat those of the Carolina Wren, but having a lighter

ground, with fewer and finer markings of slate and reddish-brown. The

ground-color is of a pinkish-white.

Mr. A. Boucard obtained specimens of these birds in the winter months,

in the State of Oaxaca, Mexico, probably of the var. _leucogaster_.

We learn from Mr. Ridgway that in Southern Illinois (as far north as

latitude 38° 20′ 20″) this Wren is very abundant, and the most

familiar species of the family. In certain localities (as in the

Valley of the Wabash) it entirely replaces the _Troglodytes ædon_, the

latter being wholly unknown. In its habits it is even more familiar

than that species, always preferring the out-buildings, even in large

towns, to the neighborhood of the woods, and still further increases

its attractions by possessing a charming song, a real _song_, of sweet

notes finely modulated, and uttered, generally, as the bird perches

upon a fence or the stable roof, its head thrown back, and its long

tail pendent as it sings. The confused, gabbling sputter of _T. ædon_,

uttered as it pauses just for an instant in its restless hopping

through the ivy, cannot be compared to the chant of liquid musical

notes of this species, which resembles more nearly, both in modulation

and power, that of the Song Sparrow (_Melospiza melodia_), though far

superior to it. On ordinary occasions the note of Bewick’s Wren is a

soft, low _plit_, uttered as the bird hops about the fence or stable,

its long tail carried upright, and jerked to one side at each hop. In

its movements it is altogether more deliberate and less restless than

the _T. ludovicianus_, or _Troglodytes ædon_, neither of which it much

resembles in motion, and still less in notes. The nest of this Wren is

usually built about the out-houses, a mortise-hole or some

well-concealed corner being generally selected. Old stables and

ash-hoppers are especially frequented as nesting-places. Mr. Ridgway

found one in the bottom of the conical portion of a quail-net which

was hung up in a shed, and another in a piece of stove-pipe which lay

horizontally in the garret of a smoke-house; another rested upon a

flat board over the door of an out-house, while a fourth was placed

behind the weather-boarding of a building. The nest is generally very

bulky, though the bulk is regulated to suit the size of the cavity in

which the nest is placed. Its materials are usually sticks, straws,

coarse feathers, fine chips, etc., exteriorly fastened together with

masses of spider’s-webs, the lining being of finer and more downy

materials, generally soft spider’s-webs, tow, and especially the downy

feathers of barnyard fowls.

Thryothorus bewickii, var. leucogaster, GOULD.

_Troglodytes leucogastra_, GOULD, P. Z. S. 1836, 89 (Tamaulipas).—

BON. Notes Delattre, 1854, 43. ? _Thryothorus bewickii_, SCLATER,

P. Z. S. 1859, 372 (Oaxaca). _Thryothorus bewickii_, var.

_leucogaster_, BAIRD, Rev. Am. B. 127.

SP. CHAR. Above ashy-brown; rump and middle tail-feathers

brownish-ash, the former nearly pure ash; without appreciable bars;

bars on secondaries obsolete. Beneath, including inside of wing, pure

white, with little or no brownish on the sides. Crissum banded;

ground-color of the quills and tail-feathers grayish-brown. Size of

var. _bewickii_.

HAB. Southern borders of United States, into Mexico.

HABITS. Nothing is on record of the habits of this variety as

distinguished from var. _bewickii_.

Thryothorus bewickii, var. spilurus, VIGORS.

_Troglodytes spilurus_, VIGORS, Zoöl. Beechey’s Voyage, 1839, 18,

pl. iv, fig. 1 (California). _Thryothorus spilurus_, COOPER, Orn.

Cal. 1, 1870, 69. _Troglodytes bewickii_, NEWBERRY, P. R. R. Rept.

VI, IV, 1857, 80.—COOPER & SUCKLEY, IB. XII, II, 1860, 190.

_Thryothorus bewickii_, SCLATER, Catal. 1861, 22, no. 141 (in

part). _Thryothorus bewickii_, var. _spilurus_, BAIRD, Rev. 126.

SP. CHAR. Similar to _bewickii_ in color, the bill considerably

longer. Length from nostril, .50, gape, .81, instead of .39 and .70.

HAB. Pacific slope of United States.

Young birds from all the localities differ from adults merely in

having the feathers of the throat and breast very narrowly and

inconspicuously edged with blackish.

HABITS. This variety of Bewick’s Wren is exclusively an inhabitant of

the Western coast. According to Dr. Cooper, they abound throughout the

wooded parts of California and northward, frequenting the densest

forests as well as the open groves. During the winter they were found

in the vicinity of Fort Mojave, but left in April, probably for the

mountains. They also winter throughout the mild regions towards the

coast as far north as Puget Sound. They are known as Mocking-Wrens,

though Dr. Cooper thinks they do not really imitate other birds, but

rather have a great variety of their own notes, some of which resemble

those of other birds and are well calculated to deceive one

unaccustomed to them. He was often led to search in vain for some new

form, which he thought he heard singing, only to find it to be a bird

of this species. Near San Diego, in April, 1862, he discovered one of

its nests built in a low bush, only three feet from the ground. It was

quite open above, formed of twigs, grass, etc., and contained five

eggs just ready to hatch, described as white with brown specks near

the larger end.

Messrs. Nuttall and Townsend observed these birds in the marshy

meadows of the Wahlamet, accompanied by their young, as early as May.

They seemed to have all the habits of Marsh Wrens. Drs. Gambel and

Heermann, who observed them in California, describe them as keeping in

low bushes and piles of brush, as well as about old dead trees and

logs, over and around which they were flitting with the greatest

activity, uttering, when approached, the usual grating scold of the

Wrens.

In Washington Territory Dr. Cooper states that this and the Winter

Wren are among the few birds that enliven the long rainy season with

their songs, which were as constantly heard in the dullest weather as

in the sunny spring. The young broods make their first appearance

there in June. Dr. Suckley found this species very abundant at Puget

Sound, where it is a constant resident throughout the year. On sunny

days in January and in February it was found among low thickets in

company with the smaller species. At this season they were very tame,

allowing a person to approach them without apparent fear. He speaks of

the voice of the male as being harsh and loud during the

breeding-season, and not unlike that of the common House Wren.

A History of North American Birds; Land Birds; Vol. 1 of 3 · 第 163 / 438 题